Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey (2014) User Reviews

My First review

[gannoncannon-944-122285 · 10/10 · 9 March 2014]

i have been watching and loving films and TV shows for years now, and loving the study of the universe for even longer than that.

that being said, this is the first time i have ever felt the need to create an account on IMDb solely to rate something a "10"

this has an absolutely stunning, heartfelt, emotional introduction, and i only anticipate it getting better from here.

i will probably update this review as the series goes on, or i may just review episodes individually. but either way, i firmly suggest that every human being on earth watch this show.

have a good life everyone.

For a program that makes us feel so small, Cosmos has a lot of heart

[willwri14 · 10/10 · 10 March 2014]

Neil deGrasse Tyson's remake of Carl Sagan's original docu-series "Cosmos: A Personal Voyage". Carl Sagan allowed the public to see the wonders of science in an entertaining, thought-provoking and immensely educational way, and Tyson manages to capture the spirit and integrity of the original series, while giving the science and facts of the 1980 original a breath of fresh air. Tyson's narration is full of charm, and the program does the audience an immense favour, and makes "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey" an easily absorbed yet thought-provoking experience.

As an admirer of the universe, I couldn't wait to view Tyson's Cosmos - even as someone who is constantly trying to absorb facts about the universe, I still managed to pick up some facts I wasn't already aware of, and this is merely the beginning. The series has 13 episodes, spread over three months, and I can already tell the program has a huge amount to give. Full of lush imagery and wonderful animation, Cosmos is a pleasure to watch, and makes learning extremely easy, something that is becoming extremely difficult in the age of no attention span. Not only does Tyson allow for lighthearted, absorbable fact, but he also allows us to probe into our own imagination, and explore the universe ourselves. Everything in Cosmos is simplified for easy learning, yet isn't dumbed down so far that the fact is closer to fiction - the visuals alongside Tyson's wonderful commentary are absolutely mind-blowingly beautiful, but allow for visual learners to take something away from Cosmos as well.

Tyson finished the episode with a heartfelt story involving his relationship with Carl Sagan, and his inspirational ways - I hope that many are inspired by Tyson's breath of fresh air in the documentary genre, and allows for the population of the world to reach for the stars. Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey is absolutely worth a watch, it is entertaining, heartfelt, absorbable, and most important, educational. As Sagan once said, "The Cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be", and I hope 'Cosmos' never ends, because all that it is is awe-inspiring and jaw-dropping in its beauty and splendour.

Superb Production Values, Content, and Commentary

[lavatch · 10/10 · 9 March 2014]

This series is a breath of fresh air when compared to the mindless programming typical of network television.

When the original Cosmos series aired on PBS in the early 1980s, the dynamism of Carl Sagan showed how educational television could also be enormously popular. Now, over three decades later, the next edition of "Cosmos" retains the integrity of the original series while providing the latest findings in science and astronomy.

Carl Sagan was a true Renaissance man, who synthesized history, philosophy, art, and science in the Cosmos series and the superb book that accompanied the program. Now, one of our finest scientists, Neil deGrasse Tyson, serves as our guide to the universe with outstanding commentary in the sequel. There was an especially moving moment when Professor Tyson recalled the time when he was warmly greeted by Carl Sagan, who took time out of his busy schedule to provide a personal tour of the Cornell campus when Tyson was about to enter college.

It is impressive that a television personality on the order of Seth MacFarlane would produce this series that includes animated recreations of historical events, such as the trial and execution of the seventeenth century "heretic" Giordano Bruno. The animations are a cut above the generic dramatizations with actors, wherein the bottom drops out of most television documentaries.

In the Academic Awards telecast hosted by MacFarlane, he closed the show with a star turn in singing "Here's to the Losers." But in this truly outstanding series of "Cosmos: A Space Time Odyssey," it is clear that everyone is a winner, especially the viewers who can embark on the voyage of a lifetime when they climb aboard The Ship of the Imagination for thirteen stellar episodes.

An excellent successor to Carl Sagan.

[compcyantist · 10/10 · 13 March 2014]

Neil deGrasse Tyson is a marvelous astrophysicist who really loves his field and you can see this in the way he narrates the series. Cosmos is not only a journey, it also shows how much science has improved since the original series, all the new evidence, technology, and ideas, they encourage the next generation to pursue knowledge and discover something amazing. The visuals are stunning, the animation is unique, and most importantly it is very informative. The way Neil describes the universe is very coherent and easy for everyone to understand. This is an excellent series that shows science isn't just flat rigorous work, it is about discovery, asking questions, wonder, achievement.

A great narration into the vastness of the universe

[brighterside11 · 10/10 · 11 March 2014]

Absolutely blown away by Neil deGrasse Tyson's hosting of Cosmos. You can tell he enjoys telling the story of the Cosmos. What makes the Cosmos remake most exciting to me is that new theories such as the 'Multiverse' theory and new findings are inevitably making its way to the front-line of grand-audience explanations of the universe. Also, now that graphics technology is more advanced than it was years ago during the first Cosmos series, the illustrations are much more telling and mesmerizing; this helps the viewer to visually break down some complexities that Neil alludes to in some of his narrative discussion.

I can't think of anyone better to narrate this story other than Neil. It's obvious he's passionate about this show. Neil's tribute to Carl was touching in explaining how Carl inspired 'just a 17 year old kid from the Bronx' to become one of the most influential scientists of our modern generation.

I'm extremely excited for the rest of the series to evolve and use the previous Cosmos series formula as a sort of foundation to continue captivating and inspiring the audience. After viewing the first episode, it's evident that future episodes will not disappoint.

Excited after watching the first episode

[pvineet131 · 10/10 · 9 March 2014]

Neil really takes the baton from Carl and does a fine job with the show. With Ann co-producing and Seth also involved, I can't wait for the rest of the episodes. All in all, 10/10 for the show. Bringing astronomy and science to everyone, Neil was the most apt person to do this. Tip: watch in 720p or higher only because the visuals are brilliant. They tried to take some elements from the 1980 Cosmos, which is noticeable. Also Seth's influence is noticeable, with a few animations. The music at times was suiting the mood, and felt modern. Seth said in an interview that he wanted to make a difference, and with this, he surely is.

Absolutely cannot wait until the next episode.

[melinazahalka · 10/10 · 11 March 2014]

This was so much fun--and it is so amazing that Carl Sagan's wife, Seth McFarlane, and Tyson Degrasse from NOVA are all together on this! I love the idea of using animation to portray ancient people--it completely avoids the campy feel of actors in strange beards and so-so backgrounds. Genius, Family Guy guy. I love the perspective it gives you, by really squishing enormous concepts into feasible bits of knowledge. It's not so you'll impress your friends--its so that you watch, and understand why you are so amazed by the universe. The computer animation of some of one of the first creatures to walk on land looks pretty darn tootin' real, as well--something that I loved. No strange feelings that their feet were hovering above the sand as they were animated--this is high quality. Additionally, Tyson seems more personable, even more likable, and definitely watchable because of his knowledge and enthusiasm for the subject. This is worth the watch, a wonderful surprise, and I am super excited for episode two. It's getting me to the gym to watch it on the treadmill. :)

Breathtaking and exciting...

[sckioskanderson · 10/10 · 10 March 2014]

This was an absolute blast to watch! I was excited from the moment that I found out that Cosmos would be returning to TV. It was, and still is, one of the shows as a child that really made me feel an overwhelming awe about reality and life as we have come to understand it. I applaud Seth Macfarlane and the FOX Network for taking a chance, and bringing this amazing mini- series to a new generation. Also HUGE kudos to Neil Degrasse Tyson for really taking the reigns, and conveying such amazing topics in thought provoking narrative terms that my daughter, and all children, can now easily understand and enjoy immensely. I really thought that everyone involved handled these topics in an elegant way in which to minimize the offense that a few may try to find with these subjects in which scientific evidence can actually back up. Thank you, to everyone involved, for the beautiful and amazing masterpiece that is... Cosmos...

Great show !

[jetmox-458-423688 · 10/10 · 10 March 2014]

Thank You Seth MacFarlane for having the foresight for bringing this back with your own money. Carl Sagan when I was growing up influenced me with the original Cosmos series to go into science and also gave me the love of science fiction.

Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson is brilliant in continuing in Mr Sagan's footsteps. The the score written by Alan Silvestri also fantastic. I will be introducing this to my young family as the love of Cosmos should be for all generations.

There is updated animation no doubt influenced by Seth's Family Guy roots but this should hold the attention of the kids as the this combined with the special effects should keep them engrossed and learn at the same time.

Look forward to more episodes and questions from kids !

Very true to the original

[hauklanglo · 9/10 · 13 March 2014]

Disclaimer: This review is based exclusively on the first episode.

First things first. Audience of the original by Carl Sagan may be disappointed by this remake. It's almost exactly the same as the original, word by word. But with cheaper production methods, brighter colors and crisper sound. Most importantly, it's without Carl Sagan and Vangelis' excellent music. Also, the stuff covered is not as amusing to the grown up audience who had the pleasure of enjoying the original. You already know this stuff.

However, the qualities Cosmos presented to us in 1980, are still the same. It's a very inspiring series well suited to kickstart a young mind into independent critical thinking, curiosity and appreciation of science. The pace and presentation have been changed to better suit todays young, and older audience may not appreciate this. The pace is however still comfortably relaxed compared to other TV material aimed towards the same audience, making me think they will have a very similar experience to the own we had all those years ago. But this series is for the young, and I'm sure it has all the qualities the original had needed when it comes to trigger their curiosity, fascination and generally change the way they see themselves and the world they live in. Personally I think Tyson does a great job walking in Sagans footsteps.

Adults with much knowledge about our world criticizing the series for being shallow and bring few new details to the original don't impress me at all. They have misunderstood the whole point of this series, which is all about creating enthusiasm for science among the younger. Not updating adult geeks on the very latest on string theory.

Adults may not learn a lot, but you will be entertained. For the younger, this has the potential to be the same amazing ride as it was for us 35 years ago.

The reason I created an IMDb account.

[Defunct_mouse · 10/10 · 11 May 2014]

Being a long time lurker, I decided to register with the site in order to review Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey. As a man with an insatiable appetite for all things science (especially astronomy and anthropology), I can't begin to describe what a delight this program is. My jaw hit the floor when I realized that this is a FOX production, as balanced educational programming is not exactly the company's strong suit. Neil pulls off an eloquent narration of the astrophysical origins of our universe, the development of life as we know it and the countless leaps in science achieved by it's often overlooked contributors (especially the disenfranchised but tenacious females that refused to fold under patriarchal power schemes). The production value is through the roof and enlivens the imagination of viewers young and old alike. I wish that I was exposed to this program as a child in school. I may have paid more attention and become a little more intellectually curious. I agree with the other posters who noted that ALL human beings should give this a watch. There is very little bias towards any speculative theory and a rich appreciation of the historicity of scientific thought. The search for meaning through empirical analysis and the hypothetico-deductive method was contributed to by so many civilizations over a vast period of time. This is the story of humanity. Beautiful, reckless, inquisitive and triumphant. I do also like how typical creationist arguments (some of them straw men perhaps) are dispatched with so quickly, and hope that some of those who rely strictly on ancient textual interpretations of the world open their minds to the truly awesome nature of reality that leaves us with questions instead of answers. The questions are for the brave.

Cosmos: 2014 - Thank You

[metallak · 20 June 2014]

thank you Dr. Tyson for being a well informed scientist and presenting this series in the humble manner it started in way back in the 80's, where most humans could grasp the true meaning. the upgrade is certainly appreciated, and heartfelt in every way. there can be no doubt that the young and old will treasure your "Cosmos" series even more with wide eyed wonder and amazement.

yours, and the entire support staff's hard work on this production has paid off, and will do so for quite some time.

maybe forever. : )

thanks again, Metallak

Rich content with bad construction

[xiandaihanyucidian · 7/10 · 3 April 2018]

US has best resource for such a documentary. Universities, NASA, national labs, Hollywood, I cannot image what is lack of. Frankly, The film is excellent for primary school kids based on my experience. As a adult, I prefer BBC documentaries on the same topic.

Rich in content, best pictures and simulation videos I have ever see, even there are some scientific flaws. However, the isolated stories seems to be less of connection. From quark to atom, then gas, solid material, moon, planet, star, system, galaxy, group, universe. Each of them are connected. However, I get confused while Nile takes me to everywhere. It's a wonderful experience to enjoy the journey, however, I got a "spaceship" sick.

A Disappointing Sequel to Carl Sagan's 1980 "Cosmos"

[csm-24 · 3/10 · 10 March 2014]

In 1980 a highly-praised science series debuted on Public Broadcasting Service television channels: "Cosmos," hosted by Cornell University astronomer Carl Sagan. One of the beauties of the original series was Sagan's grasp of scientific history, which he painted in a balanced and captivating way. The series began with a wonderful description of the great Library of Alexandria, the ancient repository of human knowledge that was finally destroyed in the year 642.

The new "Cosmos" series, which debuted on March 9, 2014, on the Fox Network, is hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York City. Although the promotions for the series tout Tyson as the "successor to Carl Sagan," the debut episode proved that he surely is not. But maybe it is not his fault. The actual writing was done by Ann Druyan, the wife of Carl Sagan, who died in 1996.

Tyson/Druyan select as the focus for the first episode the case of Giordano Bruno, who supposedly first saw the extent of the universe. This is Tyson/Druyan's first historical mistake. The Greek astronomer Aristarchus of Samos (third century B.C.) saw the extent of the universe and was the original author of Copernicus's heliocentric theory, published in 1543 in "De Revolutione Orbium Coelestium." Copernicus is identified as a "priest." This is Tyson/Druyan's second historical mistake. Copernicus remained a canon and was never ordained as a priest.

Tyson/Druyan then proceed to feature the case of Giordano Bruno, a Dominican friar of the 16th century. Although Tyson/Druyan try to make Bruno out as some kind of scientific "martyr," the fact is that Bruno was eventually executed not for his astronomical ideas, but because he strayed into many errors of theology. Galileo also got into trouble not because of his astronomical ideas, but because he strayed into theology, of which he had no knowledge. Historically, heliocentrism was not the issue that got Bruno and Galileo into trouble. Copernicus was the great modern purveyor of that theory, and he was never touched.

Tyson/Druyan present lurid graphics, in cartoon form, of prison cells and instruments of torture. They even stoop to characterize Robert Bellarmine as some kind of ogre set on executing Bruno. In fact, Bellarmine was an avid scientist and patron of science, who even counseled Galileo that his theory of tides was wrong. And the historic fact is that Bellarmine was right, and Galileo was wrong.

The new "Cosmos" relies on cheesy computer graphics to titillate the unscientific crowd rather than to present well-researched scientific history. It is a caricature of the history of science. It is a great disappointment after all the advertising hoopla. Carl Sagan would have been a balanced enough historian of science not to have presented historical fabrications under the guise of history. He would have let the truth speak for itself.

Fly Me To The Moon.

[rmax304823 · 10/10 · 9 March 2014]

You can't help comparing "Cosmos: A Space Time Odyssey" to the original "Cosmos" from thirty years ago, hosted by Carl Sagan. Among the first things you notice about the new show is that the graphics are, well, light years ahead of "Cosmos". The set of the "space craft" -- what there is of it -- looks less like a 2050 suite in a Las Vegas hotel. The music is more dramatic. And Neil DeGrasse Tyson is the host because Sagan is no longer with us.

Tyson is not Sagan. He's pleasant, looks good, sounds convincing, but there are times when his narration acquires a sing-song quality that turns the explanation into an address to a group of kids on a field trip from some nearby middle school. He's not Sagan, but then who is? I liked Sagan a great deal. He was of the moment -- longish hair, cool looking, bell bottom trousers, and he smoked grass once in a while. I also liked him because he was on the faculty when I was in graduate school and he could have chosen to drop in on my comprehensive oral exams and ask me what life would look like on a planet identical to earth except for a complete absence of calcium. (He didn't.)

But that doesn't matter. As host, Tyson may not be as familiar a figure as Sagan was -- God, Sagan was all over the telly -- but he's likable in his own right. And there is no question of his knowing his subject, beginning at the Bronx High School of Science and reaching dazzling heights thereafter.

There is an expectable amount of continuity between this program, which is a sort of up-dated sequel, and the original. One writer, Ann Druyan, had a hand in both. So we have the cosmic calendar which reduces the chronology of the universe to a single year. And even some expressions are carried over -- "star stuff." I can't wait until Tyson gets to Sagan's awesome "holy of holies." I thrilled the first time around.

I do have a problem though, regarding chronology. "Cosmos" appeared in 1980. This show is appearing in 2014. Let's see. Sums were never my forte, but my pocket calculator tells me that 2014 minus 1980 is equal to 34. That means I'm 34 years older than I was when I watched the original. I hope Tyson is all finished dealing with the dimension of time. Let's move on to something else in the next episode -- pronto.

Anyway, if he's so smart I'd have some questions for him. If the universe or universes are expanding, what are they expanding INTO? And if everything that exists started with the Big Bang of 13 billion years ago, what caused that Big Bang in the first place? And where did all those original hydrogen atoms COME from? Who's pulling the wool over whose eyes around here? Of course that gets us into metaphysics and he has nothing to say about it in this introductory episode, the only one I've seen. Judging from his Wikipedia entry, he'll have something to say about it later, and it won't make everyone happy. But, man, we need his messages now more than ever.

When a TV Show should me mandatory.

[gabkoost · 10/10 · 29 April 2014]

What can i say about this remake of an already epic TV/Documentary show? If it is not enough that we are talking about an upgrade of something that was brilliant by itself, it had to be done by one of the greatest communicators of the scientific world; Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson!

Everything about these series is brilliant. To watch the universe at work in HD tanks to wonderful animations, plus the deep and mysterious voice of Dr. Tyson, is a real experience.

Plus, the science behind it as well as the learning experience is something really worth of anyones time. When people talk about having fun while learning this is the best example.

This TV Show should be MANDATORY for everyone. There is something almost mystical about it. The perspective that we get from it about our reality is something that keeps e wondering all day long after the episode.

I would like to thank Dr. Tyson and all the people involved for this piece of Scientific Cinematography! I never saw learning, fun, science and even life lessons, fused together this well before!

An A+ documentary with storyline

[pf-brno1 · 10/10 · 29 June 2014]

Perfect follower of Carl Sagan Cosmos 1980

• gorgeous Hollywood visual effects like from A-rated sci-fi movie

• catchy story lines including cartooned biographies of famous scientists

• passionate narrator Neil DeGrasse Tyson ;)

• definitely a Must-Watch, Enjoy.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson taken a torch of education and science propagation from Carl Sagan and is carrying it proudly in our modern days. As he have a great experience with making documentaries from NOVA Science Now he knows how to bring fascinating facts and not-so-easy concepts right to the viewer in a fun to watch exciting manner. The stories in episodes from 1-13 makes a good sense and some overlapping through the episodes do not allow you to forget on them so quickly. COSMOS as opposite to many descriptive documentaries instead of just explaining facts and concepts, puts you more into the center-line of the overall story and makes it part of yours, therefore making it a really enjoyable experience.

Cosmos makes me joyful to be alive!

[david-jon-jackson · 10/10 · 25 March 2014]

As a high school science teacher, nothing brings me more joy than kids being excited about science, and Cosmos does exactly that. It brings a joy of knowledge and understanding to viewers through stunning visuals and a well-spoken narrative. It encourages a much needed excitement of scientific discovery and pursuit of critical thinking. Cosmos is also filling a gap of knowledge left in the wake of a poorly funded educational institution in America.

In an age when people fill countless hours each week with Honey Boo-Boo, Duck Dynasty, and Kim Kardashian, not to mention once "science channels" like Discovery, History, and PBS dumbing down their programming to appeal to the drooling masses, Cosmos is a serious breathe of fresh air amidst a sea of network miasma.

The greatest Odyssey

[FabledGentleman · 10/10 · 7 June 2014]

After seeing all 13 episodes of this, i can hands down say, that this is the best science program that has ever been aired. From the very first episode the grip tightens, and never lets go.

All humans will greatly benefit watching this series. The depth, details, knowledge, vision and quality is beyond anything else ever made. All this thanks to Ann Druyan which also wrote the story for Contact starring Jodie Foster, and Seth MacFarlane who basically paid for the whole journey. And last but not least, Neil deGrasse Tyson. I bow down before you in awe of this magnificent creation.

I rarely give 10's in my life. 10 is like above and beyond. For me to give something a 10, either if it is a movie, TV series, documentary etc. It must deliver above expectations, i call my 10's the "raise the bar score".

And this show does just that. I am very glad i have seen it, and i will never forget it. It is simply the crown jewel of "space documentary".

I can not recommend this enough.

The Most Fascinating Show on TV

[tmshepp · 10/10 · 28 June 2014]

I have just finished up watching all Season 1 episodes and I am now starting all over again.

There is so much information given in each episode I want to go back through and learn everything I couldn't hold on to from the first go around. This is not burdensome but quite exciting because I am none too happy the season is over.

I have seen Neil deGrasse Tyson on many TV shows and have always found him interesting. He is obviously very intelligent but does not stop there. He is funny, witty and his delivery always sparks my curiosity. I don't think they could have found a better host for this show.

I have not heard yet whether a 2nd season is in the works. If I get a vote I would love nothing less than another 13 episodes. PLEASE!!!! Glad to hear there was some filming in, what I call home, Northern California. If I had known where the filming was I might have set up shop to get an autograph from, my rock star, Neil deGrasse Tyson.

If you have an interest in Science, like I do, you can't miss this show. In my opinion it is the most fascinating show on television.

Inspires a generation of thinkers

[horacejuvenal · 10/10 · 17 March 2014]

The producers of this show have really outdone themselves in this continuation of the Cosmos series. Many television shows of its kind miss the point of being on TV: to teach young people how to love learning. There is a lack of interest in science that needs to exist again for our society to advance as fast as it can. This show teaches not only the basics of science but the desire and hunger for knowledge about the universe. And it achieves this hunger for knowledge without exploring too deeply the petty minutia of science-religion debate. The beauty of our universe and the endless possibilities of scientific endeavor are more than enough for this show to succeed, a fact host Neil DeGrasse Tyson and producers understand.

If I could rate it an 11 out of 10 I would

[joshiebones · 10/10 · 22 April 2014]

I have rated a few shows a 10 before that deserved it (House, e.g.), but this show absolutely deserves an eleven! Neil deGrasse Tyson has certainly done well in continuing his mentor, Carl Sagan, work in educating the public on the wonder of the vast, beautiful, and awe inspiring universe that we call home. The animations are amazing, and they make you feel like you're there experiencing everything as well. His explanations of scientific concepts are unlike any other. He makes you really think about your place in the cosmos like never before; where we came from and how we as a people, as mammals, as life on this planet came to be. All in all it is amazing!

Most Thrilling and knowledgeable media content on universe

[sanjayagrawal-50624 · 10 May 2018]

For me ,no TV show or movie or any other multimedia content given so much thrilling.

Every human should watch, it broadens our view and force us to think how small a human is. Also it allows us it to think whatever big our problems are, how small they are if we compare.

CGI cover-up for massive storytelling blunder

[asterisk-893-146033 · 6/10 · 11 March 2014]

Beside at least one historical inaccuracy, namely that Copernicus discover heliocentrism (instead Aristarchus of Samos in 3. c. BC, as told btw in original Cosmos series), this very first episode doesn't offer you anything which wasn't already shown in any other universe related documentary in last, say, 15 years. For a start, imaginary trip around Solar System + galaxies and obvious repetition of original Sagan "cosmic calendar". I can bet that makers of this hype will continue with massive cgi explosions of a stars, dramatic music fitful for some conspiracy theory documentaries and some other hollywoodian charms in this scientific morass. I really wonder now do producers watch original Cosmos series which Sagan do with minimal CGI and wonderful Vangelis music, and with firm scientific fact instead of adrenalin pumping effort to make us all over-hyped. Only nice thing I can add was Tyson personal memories on Sagan, which reminds me on my personal recollection on reading his book Cosmos back there in late 80. As far as I can remember, this incite my lust for astronomy. Considering more than a year introduction, this was quite a sluggish work.

Super Disappointed

[jenkins-andy · 4/10 · 25 March 2014]

I love Tyson and can tell that there were other influences directing him on how to tell the story of the universe. I know Tyson has an almost childlike wonder of the universe and it shows in all of his other appearances on the Science Channel and others. SOMETHING IS WRONG HERE.

1) number one...they are dumbing down the dialog in Cosmos. I feel that they are doing this because they are trying to teach 4th graders or something. Even if they were targeting 4th graders they don't understand that this is not necessary. Kids are smarter than they think they are. It makes for a boring show.

2) Stop with all the Science Vs. Religion stuff. OK we get it, you hate some Christians. I don't care about Creationism. I'm hear to watch science not to have some politically motivated rant against religion. There not incompatible anyways so way are you so focused on this.

3) The animations are horrible. Again I guess there for the 4th graders that this was made for.

4) This production is boring...It's hard to stay awake through this. Seriously other program such as "Universe Works" and the "The Planets" are way more thought provoking than this mess.

5) I guess my first clue that this would be a disappointment was that Obama gave an intro to this mess and that I noticed Seth McFarlane was the producer.

It sucks because I know that Tyson was bullied into this boring mess.

Carl Sagan deserves better. I loved his shows as a kid. He did not talk down to you but had a certain poetic way about him that spoke to me.