2012's The Woman in Black wasn't a great movie either, but it was one interesting horror that provides a cold atmosphere by its old setting, in spite of still being reliant to jump scares. The Woman in Black 2: Angel of Death is most likely the same, but extends the worst parts of it all. The story doesn't have any connection with the predecessor, other than having the same villain. The subtitle doesn't even make any sense, thus immediately indicates that this sequel is just some bored cash grab that doesn't have any more horror ideas than shocking the audience with loud sound effects and other stuff that calls itself "scary". Since jump scare is a dead horse that still gets beaten in years, the movie gave us an even more annoying trick that instantly kills the terror.
The only interesting part of the movie is the setting, it takes place in a time during war, as it traps the characters into this sudden supernatural situation. The story hints some arc from the main characters, but the interest just keeps getting smaller and smaller when it's starting to become a cliché. It takes really slow to deliver the real horror. Slow burn is usually a good thing to this genre, but somehow it never felt like there is any tension growing at every turn of the story. It just keeps teasing us with jump scares, that are often not the ones that we should be frightened at. Example is some object or kid popping out from nowhere, while the sound effects rise the volume to fool the audience. That trick already stops being clever in a long time, and in this movie, it just keeps doing it, which is rather annoying, and even worse, destroys the momentum. When the loud jump scares finally involve the real monster, it's no longer effective and rather felt like a repetitive noise.
The vagueness of the ghost's attacks also brings an underwhelming effect to the horror. At least the first one manages to be somewhat disturbing at harming its child victims, giving a serious tension to what this entity could actually do. Here, while it applies the same rules, it never had that same feeling when it loses a character, even when the kids have become one of the main characters. And some parts of the horror also involves taking us into dark places that makes it difficult to figure out whether the jump scares in those scenes are meant to be scary, since the filmmakers keep tricking us with loud false scares. And what concludes this journey is the most generic climax you'd ever think of in a horror movie. The production at least looks good, basically just like the first one, except it seemingly has a higher budget. The acting is okay, but their job is even less memorable than what Daniel Radcliffe has done in the last one.
The Woman in Black 2 is rather lazy than creepy. It never goes beyond its historical background and production. And those merits don't even showcase what this movie is suppose to be. There is hardly any terror and yet pulls off the laziest horror tricks of our time. It still attempt a slow burn, but the fake scares just ruins it, making those tricks even more predictable. Apart from that, it's boring. Maybe a visit from Winterrowd or Tekzoned is a lot satisfying. Horror movies that can't provide real terror can still work if it at least tells a decent story, which was almost the result of the first one. But then, this sequel has proved that the studio is just basically not sure what to do with their money. Or franchise.
26 out of 43 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink