Tender movie about coping with loss of father. The end is of course symbolic. Nothing SF about it, as some say.
3 Reviews
Tender movie about coping with loss of father
hapeeski19 January 2021
Mixed
proud_luddite10 November 2019
A woman living in a city (presumably Toronto) moves to a cottage in the wilderness during winter. Her apparent purpose is to help cure a debilitating illness.
This film has the difficult challenge of having no dialogue as the main character lives as a hermit. The first half of this rather short feature length film (one hour and twenty minutes) is beautiful and meditative. The winter scenery in Ontario's cottage country is mystical and beautiful. In this half, the film lives up to the challenge.
The second half begins to lag a bit, though, with an extremely bizarre ending that seems out of place. In this way, the film disappoints considering such a pleasant start. - dbamateurcritic.
This film has the difficult challenge of having no dialogue as the main character lives as a hermit. The first half of this rather short feature length film (one hour and twenty minutes) is beautiful and meditative. The winter scenery in Ontario's cottage country is mystical and beautiful. In this half, the film lives up to the challenge.
The second half begins to lag a bit, though, with an extremely bizarre ending that seems out of place. In this way, the film disappoints considering such a pleasant start. - dbamateurcritic.
Remarkable minimalist film
Burton_Herschel_129 August 2013
What's most remarkable about this film is that it was made at all, let alone in Canada at the current time, when the available sources of funding are both risk- and art-averse, and tend to ruin potentially good concepts with their forced 'creative' input (too many cooks, etc. - especially when those 'cooks' are businesspeople with no real understanding of film). If only more young people, upon graduating from film school, would do what the production team behind this did: collaborate to make something without having to rely on the 'official' sources of funding, and without worrying about whether it would be 'commercial', etc.
As for the film itself: it's far from perfect, but overall it's quite good at what it's trying to do - while not quite there, it's at least trying to do something more along the lines of Tarr, Kiarostami, Akerman and the like rather than taking its cues from American films (whether Hollywood or the 'mumblecore' indies). The acting (by a non-professional, who does a far better job than most 'professional' Canadian actors these days would!) is very good and nicely demonstrates the point about film acting being mostly a matter of re-acting. The use of the camera is probably the film's strongest point - while there are some conventionally 'pretty' shots, there are also quite a few images that are formally striking and effective without being 'beautiful'. The editing is minimal and non-intrusive, and always seems to suit what's being shown; the sound editing, while excellent in some scenes, goes over-the-top or becomes on-the-nose in others - especially in regards to a couple of musical choices that break the otherwise strong mood created by image, editing and non-musical sounds and which just plain don't fit. Furthermore, the plot, which could so easily have fallen into cliché 'Can-lit' territory (and surely would have under the influence of the aforementioned funding agencies!) manages not to, and so becomes a solid addition to the 'canon' of works featuring this Canadian literary trope (isolation in the snowy wilderness) rather than a rip-off or unintentional parody of them.
Given the dire state of Canadian distribution for Canadian-made films, who knows if this will still be playing at the TIFF Lightbox by the time anyone reads this, or whether it will become available on DVD or some format after its theatrical run.
As for the film itself: it's far from perfect, but overall it's quite good at what it's trying to do - while not quite there, it's at least trying to do something more along the lines of Tarr, Kiarostami, Akerman and the like rather than taking its cues from American films (whether Hollywood or the 'mumblecore' indies). The acting (by a non-professional, who does a far better job than most 'professional' Canadian actors these days would!) is very good and nicely demonstrates the point about film acting being mostly a matter of re-acting. The use of the camera is probably the film's strongest point - while there are some conventionally 'pretty' shots, there are also quite a few images that are formally striking and effective without being 'beautiful'. The editing is minimal and non-intrusive, and always seems to suit what's being shown; the sound editing, while excellent in some scenes, goes over-the-top or becomes on-the-nose in others - especially in regards to a couple of musical choices that break the otherwise strong mood created by image, editing and non-musical sounds and which just plain don't fit. Furthermore, the plot, which could so easily have fallen into cliché 'Can-lit' territory (and surely would have under the influence of the aforementioned funding agencies!) manages not to, and so becomes a solid addition to the 'canon' of works featuring this Canadian literary trope (isolation in the snowy wilderness) rather than a rip-off or unintentional parody of them.
Given the dire state of Canadian distribution for Canadian-made films, who knows if this will still be playing at the TIFF Lightbox by the time anyone reads this, or whether it will become available on DVD or some format after its theatrical run.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
