Altered Minds (2013) Poster

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
38 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
It was good....
wildblueyonder28 October 2017
though I don't see the rave reviews for it.

Do generally like Judd Hirsch but kinda felt him unbelievable in the character, in fact none of the acting particualry stood out.

Decent plot, decent premise, decent pace... nothing spectacular but comparatively a solid effort.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Definitely Not a 10, Definitely Not below 5
docm-323045 January 2021
I have to wonder if people who give 10s so gratuitously have any idea what a movie would have to be like to be given a 10/10. The acting in this one is superb, but a slow pace should not be confused with suspense. My wife and I both have backgrounds in mental health care and it held our attention to see how it would play out. however, it's not a film we'd watch again or really recommend as it's just another one of those pieces, that you watch and throw out.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie but ending was not enough
rubyz-6790428 January 2020
I really enjoyed this movie, but was slightly disappointed in the ending. I don't want to give spoilers so I won't say more. I really enjoy a mystery and this movie provided a good one. And that I do appreciate.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
family gets together...
ksf-25 January 2022
Stars Judd Hirsch as Nate Shellner. His family has gathered around for his birthday. He's not doing well. When he asks them to read his obituary out loud, we learn that he is an award winning psychiatrist, who worked for the US government, specializing in PTSD, formerly called shell shock. One of the sons, Tommy, clearly has issues of his own... he keeps asking where the family dog is buried, in spite of the many denails from the family. He has also admitted that he stopped attending therapy. Suspense. Some violence, blood and guts. We finally get the whole story from dad at the end. Co-stars CS Lee from Dexter. Ryan Onan. Pretty freaky. Not for the weak of heart. It's well done.. my one complaint is that the family wouldn't have ignored the violence between families members for so long... i think most people would have either left the house, or maybe called the cops. Written and directed by Michael Wechsler.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Are you kidding?
boowho-2641714 July 2019
Was not going to comment on this until I read one grossly overrated review comparing this film to a Bergman production and another response likened it to that of Hitchcock. This film was nothing at all to be held in such esteem. What insult.

The story was poorly written. Mumbo jumbo of supposed psychoanalysis. It's entire plot failed. Any degree of suspense is predictable. Emotional moments, intending to be poignant, are not qualified by any caliber of acting and in my opinion, forced and cringe-worthy.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent film, don't listen to the jackass in film school
imdb3-313 March 2016
I really enjoyed this movie, which was much better than I thought for a very low budget film. I was curious to read reviews and then caught the one entitled "Beware the hype for a morbid failure" that will probably be above mine that tears up the film - and incorrectly. I felt like it deserved a response from someone who did some acting but didn't take it the full route but has an educated eye.

1) Genre: There is nothing wrong with the genre. Without ruining the film, there is nothing wrong with not being sadly predictable from the moment the reel is in motion.

2) Technique: Shot with the wrong camera. This clown evidently didn't see the budget and the overwhelming majority of people - especially the average movie goer - will never be able to tell the difference. He then says "this monetary decision..." - as if a film is not worth doing at all unless it has a huge budget to be able to get the alleged camera of choice. What a snob, probably a frustrated director.

3) Acting: The clown can't decide whether ONE of the actors was somehow "incompetently played" but fails to say how. What happened was probably intentional because it makes sense in how the film plays out.

4) Deus Ex Machina: Makes you wonder whether this clown was ever truly competent in film. Doesn't know what this is and there is nothing that is pulled out of a Roman Deity's buttocks to save the day. Perhaps he shouldn't be lecturing about film school 101 because you don't need to be a director to understand the term.

5) Pretentious: Seems like someone has a serious bug up his bum, talking about how something may have been subliminally inserted into the credits. And then he rambles on about the film's showing at festivals... well... if you don't have HUGE money to pay for all those fancy cameras then you have to work very hard to get people to see the film, especially the right people. Could this LOR from New York, NY be a bigger turd? Sounds like it's par for the course in the entertainment industry.

6) Signs of the Amateur: This clown had to try to belittle the director even more. My guess... a former employee who was terminated. His complaint is that there were lots of thank yous in the film. Well... when you're a small time film maker on a small budget who is grateful for all the people who contributed to making this tiny budget look MUCH larger than it is, you MUST include them in the credits. That's business and relationships 101.

Overall I really enjoyed the film and didn't look at my watch once. For a low budget film that looks like it was only 6 figures and MAYBE just into 7 figures, it was great. It is SO MUCH better than the shlock I see on Cinemax, Showtime and other cable channels that get rerun over and over. And the bottom line is that it did have an interesting story line and believable ending. And the fact that this impish film student or former employee didn't even bother to discuss the film and just went for unrelated issues that a movie goer couldn't care less about tells you that there really weren't any significant complaints with the movie itself to warrant criticism!

So on that note I enjoyed it. I saw just a handful of things I might have done differently but I thought it was miles better than the shlock you see on low budget films and shaky cam reality movies. Worth the look and no regrets.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wow... Embarrassing
markemaier23 June 2017
Followed this film online as it went through the motions and ultimately changed its name. Waited years to see it, as I was extremely interested in the subject matter, and was seeing a lot of good reviews. Reluctantly talked my wife into watching it with me one Friday night, and unfortunately we ended up laughing at it and questioning the plot twists. Its dialogue is pretty bad, and the human interaction is alienating in its manufactured tension. Overall, it was cringe-inducing watching the actors on-screen. I gave this film an extra star because it wasn't filmed on a hand-held camera. But I would urge people to stay away from this because it is just so remarkably bad.
10 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tense, tight psychological thriller. Surprise sleeper film
amazon-3299424 November 2015
I was able to see a preview of the final cut of this film before it went out to theaters. I didn't have many expectations. Judd Hirsch is a name I recognize and didn't really know anyone else. I figured that it could be interesting with the usual amateurish bits that come with low budget films. Well, this one must have spent a ton of time in editing because each time I was expecting a lull, the film kept you moving and engaged.

Without saying too much, the premise is a birthday party for the dying father, afflicted with terminal cancer. His family consists of his devoted wife, his biological son and three adopted children. His oldest adopted child is acting strangely and complains of nightmares and has become obsessed with finding a buried urn. He's convinced that his adoptive father, a world renowned psychologist, has kept some secrets from the family. And it is about time that Dad confessed to the whole family the real truth about what kind of psychological work he performed with patients - birthday or not.

I half expected the film to become a bit sloppy towards the ending, as most do in this genre, but I was very pleasantly surprised that it is tied up quite neatly and in satisfactory fashion. There shouldn't be any groans from the audience. In fact, I found it an interesting piece on the subject of the human mind. In a world filled with mediocre Hollywood films and independent films that try to hard, this is a hidden sleeper that will keep you engaged.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beware the hype for a morbid failure
lor_26 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I caught this pretentious, wearying film last Saturday and was surprised to read this morning the hyperbolic praise on IMDb so far. Here's my minority report and warning, with the reasons I hated it intensely.

1. Wrong genre: Film is a psychological thriller, but the filmmaker adopts the trappings, many of them over- used and counterproductive, of the supernatural horror film. We have the time-honored cliché "return of the repressed", a spooky house replete with light bulbs flickering and later candlelight, gathering of a family with secrets, relatives with suspicious behavior, loud sound effects and even cornball spooky music. It doesn't fit the filmmaker's supposedly serious message in the Edward Snowden government paranoia vein.

2. Bad technique: Besides the poor choices mentioned above, film was shot with digital Red camera rather than 35mm, immediately apparent with its ugly metallic color scheme, lack of "warmth" always a telltale of TV vs. cinema (watch any cheap Syfy Channel show). This evidently monetary decision gives the film a limited visual palate and one-note look throughout.

3. Poor acting: While name talent like Judd Hirsch and Caroline Lagerfelt provide adequate characterizations, the key red herring character, their natural son who is automatically at odds with the adopted siblings, is incompetently played. I thought this was on purpose (that sounds silly and it is) to make him the Prime Suspect, but it was more likely poor casting and bad direction/acting.

4. Deus ex machina: The entire solution to the film's mystery after endless clues pointing in a different direction is the sudden appearance (via flashbacks) of the story's key missing character, responsible for the key chain of events that are the spine of the story. There is a crudely inserted setup scene early in the film that fails to prepare the viewer for the springing of this key figure on us late in the day and it is a terrible, to be avoided at all costs dramatic element of screen writing 101.

5 Pretentiousness: Right from his opening credit "Produced, Written and Directed by" auteur Michael was suspect because the usual ordering is W, P and D. By listing Written second he betrayed perhaps subconsciously a diminution of that role's importance, almost admitting that "getting the damn thing made" took over from creativity. The fact that it's been in the can since 2013 is a very bad sign, apart from the sycophantic showings at "film festivals" (an anachronistic aspect of the industry that still thrives worldwide for no good reason).

6. Signs of the amateur: Endless end credits betray the pernicious modern trend of "thank yous" according screen credit to hundreds of peripheral figures. The fact that beyond having Hirsch as first choice the director also considered Albert Finney and Maximilian Schell (latter would have really taken the film to an "evil bogeyman" precipice) doesn't mean they should get thank yous at film's end alongside James Earl Jones and even Dr. J - this is patently silly. The only end credit I found amusing is a theme song sung by a group named Hands Off My Sister.
12 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Tries hard to be a drama but it fails hard
stunt-797-756656 January 2018
After half an hour STILL I didn't know what was all about so it's amateurish. Hirsch is miscast heavily & he should stay in comedy genre. Ensemble movies? They are all failures incl. this one BORING piece of cry pseudodrama. Also that's too theatrical for a movie. You'd hate all characters. FAIL.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Masterful Blend of Ingmar Bergman, Eugene O'Neil and Roman Polanski
Alwood23 October 2013
Writer/director Michael Wechsler has fashioned a top-notch psychological thriller, which blends elements of the three above-mentioned masters of their craft into a wholly unique film.

The Shellner family reunites during a cold winter holiday for the last time, as the patriarch (Judd Hirsch) is succumbing to cancer. An internationally-renowned psychologist, Dr. Shellner is most famous for his work with war veterans suffering from PTSD. When horror novelist son Tommy (Ryan O'Nan) arrives at the gathering, his behavior starts out being erratic and escalates into borderline-psychotic rants, hurling accusations at his father of terrible abuse he heaped upon his children as they were growing up. Tommy's siblings (Jamie Ray Newman, C.S. Lee, Joseph Lyle Taylor) and their concerned, caring mother (Caroline Lagerfelt) slowly put the pieces of the twisted puzzle together, building to a shattering climax.

This is the kind of film that proves you don't need a mega-billion dollar budget of special effects, explosions and guys in tights and capes to make for an entertaining, thought-provoking evening at the cinema. There isn't a false note in the entire production. Direction, script, cinematography, and especially the performances are all top-notch. Kudos to all involved.

I shall look forward with great anticipation to more work from Mr. Wechsler in the future. 10/10.
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
masterful mystery
annemei-138-32068820 October 2014
Saw this at Woodstock film festival and it was a well crafted story that I thought was excellent. Stars Judd Hirsch,and the whole cast were great. The camera shots/cinematography were well done and I thought the music score was also very fitting, eerie. There are many twists and turns in the plot/storyline that will keep you wondering through the whole movie. Also liked the allegories they used, interesting additions that added to the mystery. The audience clapped at the conclusion so it seemed it was very well enjoyed by the entire theater. I would recommend this to anyone to see, as I feel they would be thoroughly entertained.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sizzling and Thrilling!
contact-742-5008355 February 2015
Diabolical-Engrossing!-Entertaining!

Director Michael Wechsler weaves a masterful tale that reminds us of how thrillers should be. Judd Hirsch's performance is so powerful you simply cannot take your eyes off the screen.

Caroline Lagerfelt with a class and style rarely scene these days enhances both Mr. Hirsch's performance and Mr. Wechsler's production so much so that you crave her presence when she is absent from the screen.

With the film world flooded at the moment with "independent movies" it is with a breath of pleasure to take The Red Robin Ride. This is a textbook example of what audiences today are looking for from Indeoendent Directors.

The Red Robin Winner of Multiple Awards around the Globe is an incredible "Old School" thriller!

Ramiz Adeeb Azar Artistic Director Oaxaca FilmFest
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A mystery that would make Hitchcock proud
rowishprodco29 July 2015
I am a sucker when it comes to psychological thrillers. I'm also the world's harshest critic when it comes to stories about characters having mental breakdowns so I went into this expecting to see the typical "insanity" clichés. Fortunately, this had none of them. The best thing to say about this film is it's always a few steps ahead of you. Even when you think you have a handle on what's happening, you don't. It straddled the family drama and psychological thriller genre very well, blending elements of both without letting down in either category. In some ways, the mood and tone resembled The Shining and The Sixth Sense....films rich in atmosphere and dread.

This is also the kind of film that bears repeat viewings to see how all the clues layered throughout pay off in the climax.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Few Twists, A Few Turns, and Secrets Uncovered
dougray3015 June 2016
I've seen Altered Minds described as a psychological thriller, which is in part accurate. I prefer to think of it more as a psychological mystery. I went to public school with the Writer and Director and Producer Michael Z. Wechsler, so I already had made a mental note to see this film when it was released. A small crowdfunding campaign for additional production costs let me back it and get an early copy of the DVD.

The film stars Judd Hirsch as Dr. Nathaniel Shellner, a Nobel Prize- winning psychiatrist now 75 years old and slowly dying from cancer. As his family gathers for his birthday celebration, chaos begins to ensue as youngest son Tommy exhibits a worsening mental instability and paranoid accusations directed at his father. Tommy (Ryan O'Nan), who was adopted by the family as a youngster, is joined at the get- together by fellow adopted children Julie (Jaime Ray Newman) and Harry (C.S. Lee, who many will recognize from his role on the Showtime series Dexter). Also in attendance is the Doctor's faithful wife Lillian (Caroline Lagerfelt) and eldest child Leonard (Joseph Lyle Taylor) who is the only natural child.

As you would expect, one has to tread lightly when reviewing a film like this because of the need to avoid any spoilers. The focus of the celebration quickly moves from Nathaniel to Tommy, and even though his rantings and stories sound fantastic they begin to have an effect on his two adopted siblings as well. As Dr. Shellner's work has focused on traumatized patients – especially those from war zones or former military personnel – the adopted children have vague memories of their lives before being rescued and brought to the United States. And there is the usual tension between adopted children and the one natural child. Tommy becomes more and more insistent about his claims, and soon it becomes clear there may be more to the family history than meets the eye.

Shot on a moderate budget, the home and surrounding winter landscape is quite beautiful and captures the isolation the family is experiencing; there is no world but the family itself at that moment, and the microscope can only be turned within. Ryan O'Nan does a rather good turn as the troubled Tommy. His role is one that could have easily succumbed to overacting but I found he managed to walk the tightrope successfully. To my surprise, the acting I was least impressed with was that of my personal favorite Judd Hirsch and of Caroline Lagerfelt. Granted, both characters are quite reserved in personality, but I never was fully convinced by their moments of strong emotion, whether love or anger or despair. I think Mr. Hirsch played his Dr. Shellner a touch too analytically, and perhaps that reflected onto his wife's character.

Wechsler enjoys some clever misdirection in the plot; at least enough to muddy the waters and allow you to focus more on what is happening and less on trying to guess the answers to all the looming questions. Not everything succeeds fully, but there is enough which works to make Altered Minds enjoyable and entertaining.

Overall I think most fans of this genre of film will enjoy Altered Minds, and it is good enough for me to forgive Wechsler for writing a negative review of the Romero/King masterpiece Creepshow back in 8th Grade. Considering how much I love that movie, you should be able to see I give Altered Minds more than a simple passing grade.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very good psychological thriller
samandor-1578129 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is a great psychological thriller, that proves that with a good story and script, a competent director and actors can produce a great flick on a small budget. This one is all about the story - minimal blood, minimal body count (mainly historical flashbacks to war zones), and no nudity. Very well done, and look forward to future work from this director.

Here comes the spoiler alert (watch the flick first):

*** *** ***

MK Ultra is mentioned once. Unlike most conspiracy nonsense, this was real, and involved the kinds of unethical experimentation touched upon here. We know about it now due to the Freedom of Information Act. It also encompassed such nonsensical experimentation as that semi-fictionalized in "The Men Who Stare At Goats."

Remember the films you watched as a youth in PE or health class, about the dangers of drugs, and how LSD might make you think you can fly? One of the few times that actually happened was someone under MK Ultra, dosed on LSD without their knowledge - they didn't think they could fly, they were terrified because of the state they were in, without knowing why, likely expecting that this would be the state they'd be in for the rest of their life.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best indie psychological thrillers!
jillwass22 February 2015
I saw The Red Robin at a screening series in New York City a few weeks ago and it blind-sighted me in the most unnerving but satisfying way. The movie is many things, but first and foremost, a very intense and thought provoking psychological thriller that is heavy on atmosphere and mood, not unlike many of earlier Roman Polanski thrillers. It reminded me of Thomas Vinterberg's THE CELEBRATION in its protagonists relentless pursuit of his father over the course of an evening where a family has gotten together for its dying patriarch(the magnificent Judd Hirsch) final birthday. The skeletons that come out of the closet are anything but predictable and though the movie starts off a slow boil, once it gets cooking, it has you on edge wondering what may have happened to the children who grew up in this house with seemingly loving parents. Beyond the entertainment of the mystery, the film's incredibly timely and the broken/tormented hero, played with raw emotions by Ryan O'Nan, reminded me of another banished American of ill-repute-- Edward Snowden--and his disreputable pursuit to reveal the less than savory dealings of the shadowy US government. One can't help but draw these parallels which makes the movie even more unsettling. This is a terrific film and I really hope that it gets discovered by more than the indie audiences like the one I was in.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Must watch
tikabrewer13 April 2015
I am a thriller and horror film aficionado but this clever, suspenseful movie kept me guessing throughout. The character development, which is often lacking in today's thrillers, is akin to Hitchcock and Christie. The location, on a large estate in the dead of winter, sets the perfect tone for the movie. Excellently cast with stellar performances by Judd Hirsch as the father and Ryan O'Nan who plays Tommy, his troubled adopted son. C.S. Lee fans from Dexter will not want to miss him in this movie. As the film progresses, you begin to wonder if Tommy is crazy or if perhaps, there is truth to his accusations about his father. Caroline Lagerfelt, who plays Tommy's mother is the perfect mix of caring mother and doting wife. She remains neutral for most of the film although there is a pivotal scene where you can see her doubts rise. One by one, the family members begin to unravel. Mr. Wechsler has done a fantastic job developing the storyline, which leads up to an ending you did not see coming.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Must See Thriller
lisaawechsler30 July 2015
I saw this at the Palm Beach International Film Festival" and its one of the most intriguing, suspenseful psychological thrillers I have ever seen. Judd Hirsch is amazing and it's refreshing to see him back in a major role. The rest of the cast do a bang up job portraying a family that is holding on to their wits by a thread as of their own makes damning accusations against the father and turns the house upside down. At the end of the film you are sitting at the edge of your seat as the suspense and mystery steers the way. You think you have it figured out but you find out you are so wrong. The ending wraps up the film leaving you saying - Oh, I never thought of that. I can't recommend this enough
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Man Who Knew Too Much
porter-652043 November 2016
Released on DVD in June 2016, Altered Minds is the much-lauded psychological thriller from Generation X auteur Michael Z. Wechsler, whose 1999 comedy, Slaves of Hollywood, was a sly insider's view of the bottom rung of the film industry, an absurdist Swingers. Mr. Wechsler took a decade to bring us Altered Minds (originally titled Red Robin) and, given the craftsmanship on display in the film, it's obvious why it took Mr. Wechsler, who wrote, directed and produced Altered Minds, so long to bring us such a dark, troubling and carefully-made film. Slaves of Hollywood was a lot of fun, a "piss- take," as the Brits say. To describe Altered Minds as Lord Alfred Tennyson might have, here "gloom the dark, broad seas." The film is a great leap forward for Mr. Wechsler and an award-winner: after its world premiere at the Montreal Film Festival, Altered Minds won a Jury Award for Excellence in Filmmaking at the 2014 Gasparilla International Film Festival and awards for Best Screenplay and Best Cinematography at the Oaxaca Film Festival. It was also an Official Selection at more than 20 festivals worldwide, including Glasgow International Film Festival, Fantasporto Film Festival, Palm Beach International Film Festival and Woodstock Film Festival. We may have found ourselves, luckily, in the midst of Mr. Wechsler's great leap forward.

Dr. Nathan Shellner, as played at perfect pitch by underrated American treasure Judd Hirsch, is the paterfamilias of the Shellner family, longtime residents of a leafy, sleepy enclave in suburban Philadelphia. Dr. Shellner, is a loving husband and father and a renowned psychiatrist, the founder of a clinic, and a treatment method, for American veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, a physician described by LBJ as "a true American patriot." From this coruscation we wade into the darkness (and yes, read on, what I'm about to tell you certainly shades the film, but your knowledge of it won't minimize the suspense Mr. Wechsler has in store for you): Dr. Shellner was also part of a group of doctors who, for reasons best described in our current parlance as "homeland security," performed mind-control experiments on some of the veterans in their care.

Welcome to American cinema (and television) after Abu Graihb. Torture, once a rarity in most films and shows - or played for laughs, as in the Pit of Despair in The Princess Bride - is a dominant theme, from 24 to the remake of Casino Royale (2006), in which arch villain Le Chiffre, played by Mads Mikkelsen, chains Daniel Craig's 007 (already battered and stripped naked) to a chair and whips his testicles again and again with a thick rope. We have eaten a bitter apple, and its aroma and taste have suffused much of our film culture (Deadpool (2016), anyone?).

What decisions did Shellner make when he permitted the use of his patients as guinea pigs? How did a loving father and a patriot come to participate in the torture of his own countrymen, all for the sake of perfecting torture to be used against whomever our current enemy might be? So Altered Minds, in the person of Dr. Nathan Shellner, asks the question we have been forced to ask ourselves since the discovery of what was done to Iraqi prisoners at Abu Graihb: what wrongs are we willing to essay, what sins are we willing to commit, for a greater good and what is that good? If we are each charged with creating our own moral universe with a set of fixed thresholds, thresholds that define who each of us is at the core of his or her being, what makes it possible for us to cross them? Once? Repeatedly? And, regardless of the crimes we may commit against others during travels we swore we'd never embark upon, who are we once we've done so? Every performance in this terrific ensemble piece is carefully measured and pitch-perfect, and none more so than Hirsch's. So Altered Minds is a post-Iraq film because within its narrative torture is a tool and our boundaries, familial and personal in the film and international beyond it, are insecure.

Dr. Shellner has been stricken with lung cancer, and Altered Minds opens on the evening of what may be Dr. Shellner's last birthday party. The cast of characters includes Dr. Shellner's wife, Lillian (Caroline Lagerfelt); the Shellner's one biological child, Leonard (Joseph Lyle Taylor), a psychiatrist who has now runs Dr. Shellner's clinic; Tommy (Ryan O'Nan), a horror writer and Julie (Jaime Ray Newman), a photographer, adopted as siblings by the Shellners, and Harry (C.S. Lee), a concert violinist adopted by the Shellners from Vietnam. Like Almodovar, Mr. Wechsler has a penchant for unique, expressive faces, and much of what's communicated in Altered Minds is done with a shrug or a grimace, with a tear or two but little more, by each member of the film's outstanding ensemble cast.

In a recent review of Alfred Hitchcock: A Brief Life by Peter Ackroyd, Michiko Kakutani of The New York Times writes: "More than a century after his birth, Hitchcock remains our contemporary because the world of menace he conjured embodies our deepest, most existential fears. Fears (especially resonant today) that the universe is irrational, that evil lies around the corner, that ordinary life can be ripped apart at any moment by some random unforeseen event…" This is exactly what Mr. Wechsler accomplishes in Altered Minds, and it's all done without gore, CGI…things go bump in the night, but nothing explodes, arrives from space, races across an Australian desert in a go-kart made out of human skulls…it's a thriller, yes, but a very old school thriller, the way Hitchcock and Roman Polanski used to make them. The story is jarring, repeatedly, but the film itself, as an artistic endeavor, never strays from what might be construed from its opening scenes as its raison d'etre, its mission statement.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Yes to Wow Great
wexwass12 August 2017
The only reason I found out about this film was because it was listed at the top of my Comcast On Demand in the "A's" I am, quite frankly, surprised that this title has flown under the radar because it's that good. I guess with the ridiculous amount of content out there, it's much harder for strong, solid films to stand out especially when they aren't star-studded. But still, Judd Hirsch is a solid name, no? He's amazing in this film and I wonder why more wasn't made of this performance when he's been laying low from cinema and doing mostly sitcoms.

I will say this much - if you love great suspense and mystery and wonderful acting, give this a chance. It starts off a little slow but once it gets cooking, it's under your skin and doesn't let go. With an ending I felt was every bit as satisfying as THE USUAL SUSPECTS, this movie does deliver the goods of a genre bending thriller in the vein of THE CELEBRATION.

PS....There's a WOW...EMBARRASSING REVIEW which is clearly written by someone who has a lack of knowledge when it comes to true cinematic psychological thrillers. I think this person probably would've written the same lame headline for Hitchcock's REAR WINDOW.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
NY Film Critics Series
mehrenkranz13 March 2015
As producer and curator of The NY Film Critics Series I chose to screen TRR for our groups due to its mysterious vibe of the unmanifested. What I mean by that is that it appeared that the filmmaker(s) approached this project with a vision in mind and that the film ended up with exponential layers. It is a known fact that at some point every movie takes on a life of its own, but in this case, it is entirely clear that the director was keenly aware of when to get out of the way.

I strongly recommend that when viewing this film, that one should experience it in the same spirit. When watching it, clear your head with no expectations. Do not try to draw your own conclusions or predict what may happen next. Allow the work to wash over you as a willing vessel, placing your human on vacation for 90 minutes or so.

mark ehrenkranz NYFCS series producer http://nyfilmcriticsseries.com/
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Psychological Thriller That Will Keep You Engaged!
emigdal-2365813 April 2015
This is a compelling story that will keep you on the edge of your seat. I enjoyed all aspects of this film and would highly recommend it. The acting is superb with Judd Hirsch leading a well cast ensemble of actors through an intricate plot. The film is dark and intense without rising to the level of a "horror" movie. The story builds steadily to its climax when all the pieces fit together in a finely crafted manner. I viewed this film twice at the Palm Beach International Film Festival in March 2015 and it was well received by the audience. I hope it goes into wide release so that many movie fans will have an opportunity to experience and appreciate this excellent work.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nail biting suspenseful psychological thriller
williamheller-8777930 July 2015
I saw this film at the Palm Beach film festival. It was truly a psychological thriller. The film had me wondering what path it was going to take. Many twists and turns that will not leave you disappointed. "Nail-biting" had me wondering out loud to the very end trying to solve the puzzle. Was worried it would have an M Night Shamalan ending, but this one was really earned and you did not see it coming at all. And Iguessed the ending of the Sixth Sense, so I consider myself a bit of a die-hard Cinephil that you can't get much passed. The acting and directing was excellent. If you have the opportunity to check this movie out, you will not be disappointed. Director, Michael Wechsler's film was Outstanding.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Psychological thriller about a retired government psychiatrist who may or may not have harmed his children for "the greater good."
dbobley14 January 2014
Film Review: The Red Robin - in my last, more lengthy review, I mentioned the halcyon days of high school.

Now, let me jump a few years ahead to the good ol' days of college at NYU's Tisch School of the Arts, where I classed (with many talented people. Almost everyone was creative, a few were good technicians, and even fewer were those who truly understood drama.

Michael Wechsler, who directed THE RED ROBIN ("TRR"), was one of the very few who got it all.

Wechsler's NYU short thesis film - about a mentally ill man - was decently crafted, especially for a twenty-year-old's first student film, shot on 16 mm, and edited on a Steenbeck (which is not a slight - it just is what it is). The beauty of this short was the fact that it was well aware of its dramatic center, which most films - student or not - are not.

Now - fast forward twenty years to 2010. I'm out of the film business, having lost touch with Mike for a long time. When we re-connect on FB, I learn that he had written and directed a feature film - TRR - and I was delighted to be invited to a screening of a working cut.

As some of you know, I'm notorious for walking out of films early. I often literally leave a theater before the titles end if I don't think they are well done. Why? Because to me, everything - even titles - are symptomatic of the care or lack thereof that went into making the film. And if I don't think the filmmaker cared enough to create good titles, I'm out.

The reason I bring up this point is because I felt so much care went into TRR, that even if I didn't like the film, I would have stayed the whole way through, simply out of respect for the good craftsmanship that went into making it.

But I did like TRR - a lot. I was "in" for the whole ride.

I was so full of pride that my ol' pal finally got to make a feature - and not just any feature, but a damn good one at that - a feature Michael wrote and directed himself (and starring the venerable Judd Hirsch).

It's been two years since I've seen it and I wish I had the good fortune of seeing the final cut. So, I can't (and don't even want to) comment on the details of the plot, and reference the fine crew and cast. So here's the skinny - the direction is self-assured; the editing, seamless; cinematography, rich and beautiful; the musical composition (done my childhood and NYU pal, Ed Choi) is perfect; and the acting all around is 100% believable, 100% of the time (every supporting actor holds their own when in or not in the presence of the charismatic and ultra-experienced Hirsch, which no easy task).

Now, let me comment on the most important part - the script. As Mike had commented on FB earlier this evening - actors should thank writers for their success, for without a good script, they would have nothing. Taking that a step further, anyone who has ever been entertained by anything an actor, director, or cinematographer et al. has ever done should thank a writer.

TRR is a psychological thriller, which, like Mike's student film, is ultimately about MIND and REALITY - how one influences the other. But TRR is his debut as a mature, experienced, filmmaker.

The script unfolds slowly but surely, revealing just enough (but never more than needed) to keep us on our toes. One minute, we are convinced "the big secret" is in our minds; the next, that it's reality, and the next, that it's back only in our minds, which is much more upsetting and interesting than having a guy jump out at us with an ax (or hockey stick… inside joke, folks) for a cheap thrill.

I'm not mentioning what the big question is - you'll have to watch the movie to find out - but it's an intriguing one that, like THE MATRIX, is disturbing on many levels, and has implications far beyond the hour and a half of being in the theater. In fact, a friend of my friend (who's a conspiracy "nut"), couldn't stop talking about it for months, and, in fact, still references the movie two years later.

Oh wait - in my recent review of the THE HOBBIT - I was on a rant about evil. To make a long story short, Mike understands how to portray evil. Evil is only truly powerful when we identify with it. And boy - what a job Mike does with this subject. By the end, I wasn't even sure who I wanted to root for - or what aspect of who I wanted to root for. This is truly scary - when we lose ourselves in what is "right" and "wrong." At any rate, on a personal note, back in the day, Michael's great achievement would have filled me with great envy. But now, I'm too old for petty feelings like that. Now, I only feel pride - knowing that my ol' bud has succeeded where - oh so many have not.

Kudos, Mike.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed