Well, from the score here, more people seemed to have a more favorable view of this film than I. This is just doing that rule 34 for the sake of doing it. Granted, I don't mind seeing a person dressed up as Freddy having sex and this is mainly due to the fact I generally focus on the girls when I watch an adult film. This, however, just seems just too bizarre and quite frankly if you are going to do an adult film based on something like a movie or comic or television show, at least attempt to bring in an actress or two that sort of resembles someone from the thing you are copying. The only thing we have here is Freddy with a glove of vibrators, which sort of works except you never see him use the thing on any of the females present, though one female does pleasure herself with it. Also, it just seems to me that things have gone in a completely opposite direction from the 70's. Back in the 70's an adult film generally did have a plot, a lot of times too much plot and the sex scenes seemed too short and rushed. Now they go on and on and on. I really do not need to see the same girl having sex in the exact same position for over ten minutes, thank you. They also did some thing where they were spitting in each others mouths a couple of times. I realize there is an exchange of spit when you kiss, but I still don't think it is a turn on to watch people spit in each others mouths!
The story, well it is an adult film and it was made later so there really is not much of one. Freddy was a toy salesman and he sold some shoddy toys so they burned him and he is now back to send those that wronged him into a pleasure coma. That is about all there is too it. They miss the boat quite often as another thing you should do is try to recreate scenes from the film or property you are copying. Why not have a bath scene where the hand comes up and starts playing with the girl? Why not a scene where a girl is in bed and Freddy's hands come up and start caressing and getting down and dirty? Instead, the sex scenes are typical and there is really not much story. Which I don't mind, but as I said, most of the sex scenes just go on and on and on!
The actresses are who I want to see in an adult film and if they are not to my liking I am not going to like an adult film. Which is just how it goes, adult films are going to be the hardest film to make because you cannot please everyone and it is going to be hard to tailor something that appeals to a whole lot of guys. The girls here were so so. The best looking one had virtually no lines and is the one who pleasured herself with the glove. They were all dark haired...again, why not a blond to represent Tina? I am not saying you only have the same amount of girls from the movie, just have some that do look like the main ones.
So a pretty much, eh, adult film for me. It had some things going for it, but honestly I thought the delivery of the guys during the story portions of the films were like the highlights as they made a couple of rather funny jokes. The girls all looked to similar and look nothing like any of the girls from the original Nightmare and there are no scenes that really mirror Nightmare either. There was another Wet Dream on Elm Street from 1988, but from the pictures I saw it looks like it has absolutely nothing to really do with said film. Still may check it out, as perhaps the 80's adult films have a better balance of sex and story. I remember them being some of the better ones actually. This one is just a bizarre one, but at least it did not try to get bloody or scary like I've seen a couple of other adult films based on horror films do.
