Populaire (2012) Poster

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
An irresistibly entertaining tribute to the classic 1950s rom-coms that packs wit, humour, romance and a pair of delightful leads
moviexclusive16 May 2013
Following in the footsteps of the Academy Award-winning 'The Artist', 'Populaire' pays loving tribute to the motion pictures from a bygone era. Whereas it was the silent movies of the 1920s in the case of the former, the latter sets its sights on the crowd-pleasing Hollywood comedies of the 1950s and 60s, a fact clearly evident right from its animated opening credits which look like something straight out of a Billy Wilder movie.

Then, movies were much simpler and sweeter, and indeed one should similarly expect the same of 'Populaire'. A classic rom-com that pits the slightly naïve 21-year-old village girl Rose Pamphyle (Deborah Francois) with her dapper city boss Louis (Romain Duris) to whom she is secretary to, it follows a pretty straightforward trajectory built around the world of competitive speed typing, so if you're looking for any surprises in the storytelling, then you're likely to be disappointed.

But what it lacks in novelty, it certainly makes for up in dollops of charm, so much so that we're willing to guarantee that you'll find much truth in its hyperbolic marketing tagline that proclaims it "the most enchanting romantic comedy since Amelie". There is something magical about the fit between actor and character here, a truly entrancing quality about how Francois plays Rose sweet, shy and klutzy and how Duris cuts a suave, dashing and debonair figure in Louis.

Just as, if not more, importantly, is how Rose and Louis make an exceedingly appealing couple, be it in their prickly initial encounters or their subsequent intimate engagements. Francois and Duris share zingy chemistry in their scenes together, the lively manner in which they trade barbs and words of affection bound to keep a smile on your face. Their spirited repartee is also thanks to a witty and engaging script, which pays close and sharp attention to the evolving dynamic between its characters.

Just as well-observed is the sport of competitive speed-typing, which plays a central role in the evolving relationship between Rose and Louis. Rather than give up on the otherwise dreamy and absent-minded Rose, Louis recognises her single uncanny gift of typing very quickly, prompting him to propose an unusual arrangement in which he trains her for competitions in exchange for keeping her job as his secretary. Needless to say, she improves swiftly under his tutelage, progressing from regionals to nationals and finally to internationals, the title of the film a reference to her newfound popularity as well as the name of the typewriter she does a celebrity endorsement for.

We know – you're thinking how a bunch of mostly middle-aged women in thick-rimmed glasses hammering away at ancient typewriters can be anything exciting. Well, that's where you are absolutely wrong. There is pure thrill to be had in each one of these competitions, the combined effect of whirling dolly shots and some sharp editing combining to inject much excitement into the repetition of pounding keystrokes and slamming carriages. Never for once failing to amaze with the intensity and concentration required of participants in such competitions, it suitably jazzes up what one would assume a sedate activity, let alone a sport.

The staging of these contests is but one illustration of how impressive the mise-en-scene of the movie, which is even more amazing for the fact that this is also director Regis Roinsard's feature filmmaking debut. Roinsard, who also co-wrote the script with Daniel Presley and Romain Compingt, combines detailed set and costume design by Sylvie Olive and Charlotte David with a classy score by Rob and Emmanuel d'Orlando and classic French oldies from the likes of Jacqueline Boyer, Jack Ary and Les Chausettes Noires, the effect of all these various elements making for a remarkably rich and authentic period portrait.

Especially as modern-day films revel in greater shades of grey, it is refreshing to see a movie whose pleasures are so elemental and yet deeply enjoyable. "Populaire" harks back to the days of the Doris Day rom-coms – even as it also pays homage to other classic films of the same era, most notably Alfred Hitchcock's "Vertigo" – offering a delightfully buoyant time brimming with wit, humour and passion. Excuse the pun – if you're looking for a movie to lift your spirits, this one strikes all the right keys.
39 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intensely engaging
Gordon-1119 July 2013
This film is about a woman who is a bad secretary, but a super fast typist. Her boss employs her just to enter typing competitions.

"Populaire" tells a story of a girl who is shot down by almost everyone in her life. She treasures her job as a secretary, but she is just not up to it. Her boss trains her intensely for the typing competitions. Along her way to glory, she encounters supportive acquaintances and a complicated love affair. The story is very engaging, and the music during typing competitions are very pleasing to hear as well. Rose is a sweet and hardworking girl, she is a lovable character that connects with the viewers. To see Rose getting all the attention she deserves, and even more, is very satisfying, the ending is so poignant that will surely captivate anyone. Who would have thought, that a film about a machine that is irrelevant in today's society would be so intensely engaging?
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
French romantic comedy
karima429 December 2013
This is a French romantic comedy, I enjoyed watching it but it also has some problems. The good parts: The best part about the movie is the nice set design and the costumes. It's great to see a movie that is not set in a contemporary US city like most other comedy movies. I liked the female lead actor.

What I didn't like: The two actors don't seem to have real chemistry. Both main leads are supposed to have certain features. She is supposed to be a klutz, he is supposed to appear a bit mean but should be a good man on the inside. This characteristics are used to explain why they act the way they do. Unfortunately the director spends about one and a half minute on these characteristics and that's it.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sweet but not too sweet
bloodbathcat20 February 2013
The last time I went to the movies was for Avatar but walking through yet another snowstorm in Montréal I decided I was up for a light and colourful movie, and didn't care much what the story was about. So Populaire was a pleasant surprise as the premise is fresh and interesting. It's the story of a young and pretty typist so fast on her typewriter that her boss challenges her to win a few typing competitions. So it's like every sports film with the bonus of a love story. The third act is a bit unnecessary and repetitive but the movie is quite adept at walking the fine line between stylish and kitsch. Plus, in it's subtle way, Populaire shows us what it was probably like to be a working girl in the late fifties. The movie works best when focusing on the relationship between the two leads. They are quite charming ( if I were a girl I would sure paint my nails the way she does !). Better than the poor box-office in France led me to believe.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
She Looked Very Cute and Fashionable, and That's All, but It's Enough
yagian12 September 2013
Déborah François as the heroin, Rose Pamphyle, looked very cute and fashionable. That's all, but it's enough for me to see this movie for a change. I am guessing that Régis Roinsard, the director of this movie, just wanted to make Déborah look as cute and fashionable as possible in this movie, and he was successful.

Although this movie has many shortcomings that audience can point out, it doesn't matter at all. For example, the plot of this movie is quite stereotyped, but it is better to make audience concentrated in the heroin Déborah.

I love Kabuki, whose plots are usually dubious. The audience of Kabuki mainly wants to be fascinated with the beauty of Kabuki actors, and a deep plot would disturb the entertainment of Kabuki.

Of course, Déborah François herself is very attractive. She shows a variety of expressions, smile, anger, tears, envy, and love, and all of them are charming.

If you thought that she was cute in the trailer, it would be worth seeing this movie.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wonderfully silly and bright and well acted
secondtake7 November 2013
Populaire (2012)

A French comedy, set in the late 1950s, and centering around a typing championship? Yes, bizarre, and warm and funny. I liked it a lot.

The star here is the completely delightful Deborah Francois, who is cast and who acts a bit like an Audrey Hepburn type, which is a total compliment. Not that Francois needs that kind of comparison—she takes on the task of learning to type with enormous focus and humble prowess. With two fingers. And she almost wins a competition that way.

Enter the other star, a bigger name in France, Romain Duris. He's a comic oddball, meant to be very handsome but not a hunk (sorry Romain). He depends on his wry, underplayed humor to win the hearts of the females in each movie—and in the audience. He takes on Francois with the idea of teaching her to use all her fingers and maybe, with some serious athletic training, compete for the big time. At typing.

It's a farce, but overflowing with charm. The sets and colors are wonderful per- 60s "gay" and light. French style. There is an ongoing critique built in (in a watery way) about how women in that era have typing as their ultimate goal. And typing for men. The irony (and falseness) are apparent.

There is inevitably a troubled romance that gets stirred in the mix—and it's a classic mismatch made in heaven.

In all, well done, funny, and smart. And styling right to the end with the big finale—well, I can't say where or why. See it.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Making the incredibly mundane interesting....
planktonrules26 October 2013
My daughter recently saw this film at a festival in Philadelphia and insisted I should see it as well. Fortunately, it's now streaming on Netflix and I got a chance to see it myself today.

The subject matter for this film is incredibly mundane--so mundane and dull that it's a wonder that the film would hold your interest. However, it managed very well. Who would have thought a film about a woman training to be a speed-typing world champion could be so much fun? Plus, while I am not sure about this, I assume there never has been any sort of international speed-typing competition and I KNOW if there had been one, they wouldn't have been celebrities like the folks in this film. However, I kind of liked this, as it was a bit silly and added to the kooky charm of the film.

The movie begins with Rose (Déborah François) leaving her small town and going to the city to get a job as a secretary. However, despite being able to type remarkably fast using the hunt and peck method, she isn't a very good secretary. However, her grouchy boss, Louis (Romain Duris) hires her anyway, as he's VERY impressed by her typing. However, it's soon obvious he's not that interested in her being a secretary and much more interested in training her to be a speed-typing champion. He moves her into his home, cooks for her and coaches her unmercifully--all to make her a champion. However, despite Rose winning competition after competition, Louis never acts happy--and keeps driving her. Rose is adorable and sweet, and yet Louis is almost machine-like in his detachment. What's next? See this strange and quirky film.

The best thing about the film is its design. I love the late 1950s look and unlike some period films, this one tried very, very hard to get the look right. I also loved Rose as a characters. But the film also had problems. Despite liking it very much, Louis' character is too unlikable--and her falling for him (like Liza Doolittle in "My Fair Lady") made no sense. Sure, he's handsome but he's also incredibly selfish and under-emotive. Additionally, the film is pure formula throughout--the only difference are all the nice trappings and nice way the director handled the familiar themes. Overall, a great date movie and a nice rom-com that isn't too demanding. I would like to give the film a 7.5, though IMDb won't allow that. I enjoyed it a lot even with its clichés (such as how Rose's father behaves late in the film).

By the way, I looked it up and there really was a Japy typewriter company in France--it was not created for the film.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice movie
honytantanyhon29 January 2022
The first world typewriting championship held in Chicago in 1906 and has been won by Rose L. Fritz. It still exists since that time.

International speed-typing competition is a long tradition. It is very pleasant to KNOW that a movie pays tribute to it now.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Endearing comic love story
PipAndSqueak1 June 2013
If it weren't for the very specific year during which the action in this movie is set, the perfect music for this would have been 10cc's 'I'm Not in Love' - Of course Louis is in love, and only he doesn't realise it. You can forgive him, after all, this is post second world war and he has lost too many meaningful people to want to risk another loss. Rose has perfect visceral understanding of the feelings of those around her. She's also a super-fast one finger typist. We 21st century equivalents may have super-fast thumbs instead. The period feel, superb costumes and believable dialogue make this a very satisfying production. Not sure about the brief bedroom scene that doesn't belong here. Fancy a good, uplifting entertainment, choose this!
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good atmosphere
christophe9230027 April 2013
The strength of Populaire lies in the atmosphere of the period and the accurate depiction (at least it seems to be) of France in the late 50's.

On the content, it is less enthusiastic. The movie is quite uneven, alternating between good, dynamic passages, and a lot more heavy ones weighing down the rhythm. The plot is, in the end, relatively conventional, predictable and struggles rather quickly, so much that one starts to switch off after barely the hour mark. The last 30 minutes are particularly laborious and give the impression that Roinsard didn't know where to go nor how to end his story.

One could have also appreciated stronger and more developed supporting characters because the Duris-François duo, though effective and complementary, is a bit alone.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very fresh and enjoyable romantic comedy !
Rold-Ickam22 August 2013
Populaire is the shiny pearl type of movie. Simple enough to be worn regularly and noticeable enough to be more than a touch of color. The typical 50's pastel and soft colors are everywhere in the movie, except when the tone of the story turns less glamour and kitsch to become more intimate. Then the colors turn brighter, sharper and more intense... following the scene moods.

I had no idea about what kind of movie my friends dragged me to but I have to recognize this was a very pleasant surprise. The lead actors (Deborah François and Romain Duris) are carrying the whole movie and it turned way more thrilling that I could expect at first from a type machine competition movie.

There is some sense of Pygmalion and My Fair Lady where love is in the air even though it wasn't the initial purpose. When a young, pretty and innocent girl is coached by her boss, she turns into an accomplished and genuine beautiful Lady.

If you're planning a nice movie sessionflick with your soulmate, without complicated plot or senseless violence and you want to ensure you'll finish smiling at the end, go for Populaire, worths it !!!
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Popularity or not?
kosmasp30 September 2013
It might feel simple in its premise (what romantic comedy doesn't? Only a few might have a real complex story), but the actors are really good in it. Actually it is very reminiscent of classic movies and its not a coincidence that the costumes and or haircuts are very much in the style of Audrey Hepburn. It could have starred the actress from the past easily and feel the same.

So while the viewer might know where this movie is leading (no real surprise here), it is the journey that makes it worthwhile. Rich, poor it doesn't really matter, as long as you follow your dreams. Whatever they are and whatever obstacles are in your way.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Drumline with Typewriters
carrot9917 January 2016
A very sugary fairy-tail esque romantic comedy with plenty of style and flavour. The male lead seems to have the issues, unlike the female lead, which was a nice reversal.

It's nothing too overly dramatic and stupid like most romantic comedies sercombe to in their third acts. Perhaps because of the "sports movie" element to it.

Overall it's very sweet. You'll love Déborah François in the lead role, along with Romain Duris as a man who makes very odd facial expressions. The cinematography is very beautiful and lush. Highly recommended for anyone.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Uninspired generic romantic comedy
Roshtaria20 September 2013
I can only imagine this was the kind of movie that inspired the "French New Wave" movement decades ago. Not because of it's brilliance mind you, but rather the opposite. A visually stunning studio film that does nothing but stick to generic conventions while giving the audience nothing new.

A cute but vapid story with nothing more clever than what is at the surface. A good romantic comedy says more with out being so obvious. If you like romantic comedies this is no Brigitte Jones, Amelie, Silver linings Playbook, or When Harry Met Sally, this isn't even "You've got Mail."

I wouldn't waste my time, because I want mine back.

My total score is a 5. I gave this a +5 for being well made, and a -5 for the lack of originality and terrible level predictability.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A wonderful surprise of a film!
ThurzdayNext28 June 2016
It's been a while since I wrote a review, but when I saw the low rating for this wonderful movie, I simply had to chime in! This film became an instant favorite of mine because it has all the right elements of a good romantic comedy. Not like the rubbish we Americans make today, but like we used to make when Audrey Hepburn and Cary Grant were around. In fact, the lead actress, Déborah François, bears a striking resemblance to Joanne Woodward, Paul Newman's wife, herself a wonderful actress in her own right, as well as Audrey Hepburn. That may be by design, but she fascinates me! The resemblance was the first thing that struck me. The second was the ambiance of the film. The actors seem perfectly cast, and it was easy to believe that they were in fact, set in the 1950s.

Without giving away the admittedly simple, yet highly effective story, I found myself guffawing at unexpected moments. Déborah François has great comedic timing, and Romain Duris as her leading man, wisely lets her take the lead.

Were it not for a single love scene, I would say that this would have made an excellent family movie. Still, for those 18 and older, it's a wonderful film with a great soundtrack, and oddly enough, includes a character (played by Shaun Benson) who reminded me a lot of Gene Kelly.

Enjoy!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Popularize is Charming, Funny and Sweet
fireflypsngr28 March 2016
Found this on Netflix. I needed a feel good movie and this movie was perfect.

Set in the 1950 Romain Duris plays Louis Echard an insurance agent in need of a secretary. What he finds is a beautiful but clumsy girl whose saving grace is her fast typing with 2 fingers.

As the movie unfolds it just grabs holds and takes you on the journey to the World Championships in Speed Typing.

I became an instant fan of Romain and want to play catch up on his movies. I hope he finds a Hollywood script that allows him to shine.

Romain Duris reminds of Cary Grant, handsome, funny, charming and incredibly talented.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
retro works here
MonsieurMS7 July 2018
This retro '50s comedy is hilarious, charming and a true throwback. They smoke themselves to death (well, ok, the French still do that!); the women are, of course, relegated to lesser roles; there is a certain prudishness about sex, and the thought of an unmarried woman cohabiting with a man causes a bit of a scandal. This is not your modern French film, in other words. Somehow, they make a typing contest exciting. It all works--even if Doris Day would feel at home here (well, except for that slight flash of nipple and the later glimpse of a sex scene).

It also adds a layer of insight and gravity that elevates it a bit when the male lead finally confronts his childhood girlfriend. Overall, this works great. Now, finish this and run over and watch "Shall We Kiss?," another great French rom-com.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
All work and no play makes Rose a dull girl
rooee8 June 2013
There's been a lot of hype and marketing "buzz" about Regis Roinsard's good-natured rom-com, possibly thanks to its superficial similarity with TV's Mad Men. But while this film has the sharp suits it doesn't have the sharp edges of that show - it is quite an ordinary underdog story. It's sometimes charming, but often sentimental, clichéd, and predictable.

The year is 1959. Deborah Francois plays Rose Pamphyle, a pretty and pretty vacant Normandy girl who loves typing. When she gets a secretarial role at an insurance agency, she enters into fraught relationship with her boss, Louis (Romain Duris). He is forceful in his attempts to make her the fastest typist on the planet and gain the world title in New York.

Their relationship - which comes across as a kind of PG-rated version of Maggie Gyllenhaal and James Spader in Steven Shainberg's Secretary - has a context. Rose is devoted to her father, but he shows her no attention, while Louis is haunted by an unfulfilled former relationship, which has left him with a crippling "second-best" pathology.

This makes the film sound deep, but really the main focus is on Rose's simple self-actualisation as a super-typist. There's the initial realisation of her skills; there are montages; there's the end-of-second-act moment of doubt; there's the grand final. It treats typing as Happy Gilmore did golf or Dodgeball did dodgeball: a vehicle for a familiar story about a humble emerging hero, albeit with more rom and less com in this case.

Determinedly old-fashioned, its nostalgic evocation of the post-War era is detailed and sinister, while the story is sweet-toothed to the point that its bite is too soft and mushy to make an impression.
5 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Lovely French rom-com underpinned by....fast typing
Red-Barracuda12 October 2017
An awkward girl from a small French town discovers she has an uncanny skill in speed typing. Soon thereafter she gets a secretarial job at an advertising agency. Impressed with her skills, her new boss enters her for a national speed typing contest. Love soon enters the mix, resulting in complications.

This French romantic-comedy is one with a glossy and polished feel, one with an unashamedly nostalgic view of the 1950's. It's also one with a fairly typical plot trajectory for this kind of thing but I often find I am extremely forgiving of predictability in romantic-comedies so long as I care for the characters. And in this case both of the central roles are very well played by regular French leading man Romain Duris and, especially, Déborah François in a lovely turn as the central heroine. I found it quite easy getting on board with this pair and was very willing to forgive over-familiarity once again. It's essentially another version of the Pygmalion story, with Duris' older man trying to mould François into something special. The one area, of course, where the movie stands out is in centring the drama on the, hitherto very uncinematic sport of speed-typing. But, as with any well-written and acted film, it succeeds in presenting this somewhat niche activity like it was the FIFA World Cup final! And you know what? Movies aren't real life to begin with so ya just got to go with the flow and believe in them when you watch them as, otherwise, what would be the point? And I, for one was more than happy to spend time watching Déborah François type super-fast with a two-finger technique. I found this good-natured movie overall a very enjoyable one indeed, it was simple and affecting yet still delightfully quirky in its own unique way.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Almost offensively out of date - what was the point
hinforr7 December 2014
Well, I suppose some would say it is a comedy. In fact it is not really funny. Of course sometimes, occasionally, it might raise a smile, of sorts. But it is stretching it to call it a comedy. If it had been made in the 1950's or early 1960's when it is supposed to be set, rather uncertainly - there are inconsistencies in the set that could go towards its goof count - it might have interest as a historical document. But to think that this was made as late as 2012 begs questions of values the production team and others involved (except perhaps for the actors, who would always appreciate a crust of bread.) And it begs a similar question about those who were rating it as highly as they did.

The "girls", adult women, are treated as performing chimpanzees, set up to compete - in the final showdown indeed in a non-contact cat-fight, as speed typists, the acme and ultimate ambition for women in the man's world that is/was an office. The romantic line running through it, that may allow some to ignore the reality of what the film said it was about, is really thin and full of stereotypes, and the final denouement is sad in its predictability. Really, have they learnt and understood nothing about the relations between the sexes, patronising bosses (patrons), lecherous bosses' sons, equal opportunity, sexism and discrimination and so on. It is not a question of "political correctness", just of maturity in film-making. This is not mature. Who was the intended film audience, what were they wanting to say to those people? That that was some halycon, good-old-days ? There is a place for re-creating old film styles. For a brilliant film that does successfully to the highest degree, by contrast with this, see:he Artist another French films made only a year earlier in 2011, also called a romantic comedy-drama (written, directed, and co-edited by Michel Hazanavicius). Ironically that film also had Bérénice Bejo who deservedly was praised for he part. In this film there was nothing that she could have done. Or anyone for that. Sorry folks, that's all!
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
And they all typed happily ever after...
rps-29 May 2014
This is a silly modern fairy tale and also a delightfully refreshing movie done with the unique flair the French bring to such things. It was especially welcome after a couple of nights trapped in really bad Hollywood movies. It's charming and comical, silly but still sexy. International typing contests on the scale of the Olympics? Play by play radio broadcasts of them beamed across the ocean? As mentioned, it's a fairy tale. The picture is set in 1958 and it has captured that era so perfectly, complete with the multi-coloured, animated titles that were then standard, that I wondered if it really was an old film. Not at all. It dates to 2012. (Some of us are old enough to remember those big plastic sunglasses, flaring skirts and bobble head hairdos. They got it right!) It's a very well done piece of fun filled French fluff. Just the thing for a rainy Friday night!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
the girl can type
ksf-230 March 2022
Period piece. Rose (deborah francois) doesn't have many secretarial skills, but she is lightning on the typewriter. Her boss enters her in contests... but he's not done with her yet. She must also learn the piano. Lots of singing and dancing, which wasn't really part of the story, but kept things light and fun. The more famous rose gets, the farther away she feels from louis. Can they patch it up? It's a fun journey! Can she have her man and the championship as well? Directed by régis roinsard. Subtitles. Good stuff.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Rocky with Typing.
TooManyFives6 June 2013
This is a very entertaining film that gives you big laughs, lovable characters and true feelings of emotions positive and negative.

Let me explain (badly no doubt) my Rocky comment

From a comment in a game of tennis between the 2 main men in the film onwards tho i noticed that it was Rocky. OK a romantic comedy where the boxing ring has been replaced with desks and rather then punching each other the prize fighters are slopping it out to see who can type the most characters per minute. I noticed elements of the first 3 Rocky's and i am in no way saying this is not a bad thing, it was almost like they were paying homage to it in someways.

Like all Good subtitled films within the first 5 minutes i didn't even realise i was reading.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Forced, predictable and worst of all - boring.
Nobody-2716 January 2016
"Populaire" is finely crafted piece of junk that I could barely watch to the end; and watch it I did, but mostly in the same way that one is rubber-necking when passing a really bad car accident.

While the sets and performances manage to give us a kitschy feel of the 60s, everything else falls flat on its face: the story is dull, predictable and forced to the same degree that "Armageddon" was forced. Yes I am comparing this film to "Armageddon" - they both share an important "quality" (for lack of a better word): artificially created drama to keep the story moving. In Armageddon, every time the story slows down too much there is a meteor shower, while in "Populaire" boredom is interrupted by senseless arguments between main protagonists - meteor showers of different kinds.

Characters are ill-conceived, their motivations inexplicable, their actions everything but funny, and as a result, the film flows like a stale joke told by a three-year old who forgot the punch-line.

Someone said that this is a "feel-good" film. Nothing could be further from the truth. Even if we ignore the overly sexist world of this film in which men are gods and women are ordered around, we are still left with a sadistic boss who never manages to be likable, his little less psychotic secretary whose motivation is unclear to the very end and their family and friends who manage to stay boring despite suffering from severe mental problems.

We never get to believe that the main protagonist really wishes to compete in the speed-typing. As a matter of fact, the only reason she accepts the challenge is because it was a condition for her employment. Why would a boss employ an otherwise useless secretary just to have her compete in speed-typing? None of those things make any sense in the film, we are just supposed to accept that speed-typing was a world-class event in the 60s (it was not), that your average boss is crazy about your winning a meaningless competition, and that women were aching to work as secretaries, while male bosses were naturally psychotic, and that all that was fun somehow. To make it harder to suspend one's disbelief, the main protagonist is showed typing in an entirely impossible manner. Normally, actors and directors go out of their way to try and portray such detail with as much realism as possible, but here, the director has thrown caution to the wind, probably in an attempt to make the film less boring; however, it achieved the exact opposite.

Here and there it seemed that "Populaire" was meant to be a little quirky, the way "Delicatessen" or "Amelie" was... or maybe I just wished for some redemption for the time wasted watching it. As you may guess by now, that didn't pan either.

In the end what we are left with is an inexplicably dumb premise, with shallow characters, leading us on a wild-goose chase of forced emotions and relationships. All in all, one of the worst films of recent French cinema.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the most charming movies ever made
daisukereds11 July 2021
Stylistically and aesthetically incredible, and a beautiful homage of old rom-coms. Incredibly engrossing and tightly written script. Nigh-perfect casting and acting. And more importantly, a well intertwined message of aspiring to something beyond fear of disappointment, and a bit of self love.

A great story where a naïve and seemingly talentless young from Normandy (1959) girl finds a job in the city as a secretary, and is pushed to achieve greatness by taking part in a typing championship. This romance is elevated by every bit of movie-making.. Music, editing, camerawork, all of it! The credit and title bit at the beginning sets it up wonderfully. You have only to see the first 7 minutes to know if you'll like it or not.

It is fairly straightforward but doesn't lack in depth or emotion, and leaves you with a big smile on your face.

I would watch this many times, and would easily recommend it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed