Pretty Dead (2013) Poster

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
10 Stars for Effort and Original Ideas. Execution and Overlong Scenes, 4.
Bababooe27 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Decent idea. The actors did well, but not great. It looks like if they had a larger budget more takes could have been taken or at least more rehearsals. The most painful part of the film is how most of the scenes are so long and drawn out that they lose their impact. There was some atmosphere built with the psychologist interviewing the Regina, the Zombie Chick, but not much. The ending sucked.

I had to take a few breaks to watch this. Also, I had to play guitar along with the viewing so I can manage the boredom. I cannot completely dismiss the film, because it had some original ideas. However, they ideas needed more. There was some mention of Regina's mother having a similar disease, but was not expanded on. That would have been interesting. There was a mention that she killed 4 people and ate them, but she only killed the pizza delivery guy and her fiancé. She also attacked one of her guards, but we don't know if the guard was killed.

Some of the hand held camera shots were decent and fit into the film. But some were just too long and boring.

Some of the dialogue was also unbelievable. Like when the fiancé found the dead pizza guy in the tub.

Rating for Effort and some ideas: 10, A Rating for Film: 3 or 4, D
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A strong story and earnest effort is hampered by questionable choices and dubitable skills
I_Ailurophile11 October 2023
The premise sounds interesting enough to have caught my attention. From the very instant that one starts watching, however, we have misgivings about the entirety of the viewing experience to come. Not only does the picture present as a found footage flick, which is an especially "hit or miss" genre in the first place, but the production values are extra painfully bare-faced. Yet this isn't the "lo-fi" appearance of actual home video, or consumer-grade electronics - but rather the transparent indication of a very low budget, and moreover, lack of care (from the producers, if no one else) as to how the finished product looks. If the scenes of chief character Regina out and about with her fiancé or friends aren't evidence enough, the scenes of her being interviewed by hospital staff make this plain as day. Weirdly, the one exception, and the scene that is arguably the strongest one here, is a bit of a scant few seconds that's withheld as a post-credits scene.

Would that the production values were the only issue facing 'Pretty dead.' Too much of the dialogue and scene writing are rather rotten, and ill-advised; plenty of moments definitely boast firm ideas as foundation, but flounder in the details. I'm sad to say I also have reservations about Benjamin Wilkins in what seems to be his first and so far only credit as a director. Too much of the acting, and the fundamental orchestration of shots and scenes, are plainly weak and unconvincing. I presume other flaws and shortcomings also follow from Wilkins' overarching vision as a filmmaker: the extra meager camerawork, questionable sequencing and editing, and so on. This also applies to the very use of Chanda Dancy's original music, which is fine in and of itself, with a couple themes that especially tickle my ears - but which is ill at odds with the approach of "found footage," as if Wilkins was trying to have the best of both worlds (found footage and conventional narrative storytelling). It's also possible that individual contributors are also to blame, as seen for example in how some acting is notably more troubled than others'; in the very least I recognize the earnestness of Carly Oates' lead performance, and I see skill that I trust would flourish if given the chance.

What makes all this confounding is that the root story is fantastic. The tale whipped up between Wilkins and co-writer Joe Cook, which served as the basis for Wilkins' screenplay (also his sole writing credit to date, as far as I can tell), isn't reinventing anything, but I think it's perfectly solid, with a rich bounty of terrific ideas. The narrative is interesting and compelling as it takes on a classic (some may reasonably say overdone) horror concept from a slightly different angle, and it feels relatively fresh. Yet with this in mind, though I hate to cast aspersions on anyone whose only crime is making a movie, I think the health of the underlying story further erodes confidence in Wilkins. It's his direction that leaves a lot to be desired. I may well be mistaken, but I can only assume that it's his screenplay that took that great story and molded it into a found footage flick. 'Pretty dead' had potential to work as a found footage flick, and it does in some measure, but I really have to wonder if the material wouldn't have been better served with a conventional narrative format; the feature as we see it sometimes feels like the cinematic equivalent of trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

Please understand, I don't dislike this. I'm glad I took the time to watch. I see what it does well, including the practical effects, and the stunts that are hampered somewhat by the direction. The cast make an admirable effort. I don't for one moment doubt the sincerity of anyone involved, and I must repeat that the story at the heart of these seventy-seven minutes is really quite excellent. It's just regrettable by one means or another, the form that this film ultimately took reflects decisions that were dubitable, and probably skills that were less than sure-footed. I wouldn't altogether tell someone not to watch 'Pretty dead,' but nor can it claim enough strength to specifically warrant a recommendation. When all is said and done I think this is entertaining, and worthwhile on its own merits, with the caveat that its faults are just as apparent as its advantages, if not more so, and in turn 'Pretty dead' is something best left for a quiet day rather than particularly seeking out.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Sub-par cannibal tale
victoryismineblast25 January 2014
The film opens with the pretty doctor Regina sticking a gun in her mouth and pulling the trigger. We are then informed that she had "murdered and cannibalized at least 4 men, but had never been brought to trial."

Cut to a mental hospital where Regina is being treated by a psychiatrist, after surviving her attempted suicide. She insists that she is a monster who he must let die, while he insists she has schizophrenia.

The bulk of the film is then told through flashbacks that show us her courtship and eventual engagement to Ryan, an EMT. Ryan and Regina attend a karaoke party in which drugs are involved, and Regina has a bad reaction and is rushed off to hospital. Soon after recovering, she finds that she can no longer stomach normal food, except for raw pork.

Soon that is not enough and she finds that she can only subsist on human remains, so after work she steals those bags labelled "biowaste" out of the hospital garbage and brings them home to consume.

What follows is an increasingly ludicrous series of events that pretty much defies logic. Regina pours bags of human fat into a glass, and drinks it like a milkshake while her fiancée looks on, giggling. It doesn't even seem to phase him. She tries to eat him and he laughs, and tells her to hurry to work. They watch a documentary on ants and decide from that that she has a fungus in her brain.

None of this seems to make any sense to me but I went with it, waiting for something interesting to happen. Nothing really did. The two leads do a passable acting job but Regina's psychiatrist character is portrayed with some of the worst acting I have ever seen. The sound is horrible and the music sometimes is so loud that you can't hear what the characters are saying. All in all a big letdown, with a laughable ending.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Thank God this movie only lasted 70 min
tohkwongweng24 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Contagious Killer Fungus that causes the infected to kill humans and consume their flesh. What a brilliant idea! Unfortunately this movie was an absolute disaster in its execution. So Regina was infected by contaminated cocaine. While sending a powerful anti-drug message, this movie did nothing else for me. I know it's a B movie and I should lower my expectations but I really couldn't wait for the nonsense to end. I found myself cringing at the amateurishness of the acting, the production and even the cliche, "the pizza guy dies"! Please don't waste your movie night on this one. It was a complete joke in all aspects.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed