The Last Exorcism Part II (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
63 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Just TERRIBLE. Unnecessary sequel, pitiful writing and poor execution.
ripleyclone81 March 2013
The Last Exorcism Part II is simply put a terrible movie. I absolutely loved the first film but Part II is like the Blair Witch Project 2 of the original Blair Witch Project. Its unnecessary, it doesn't accomplish anything and it doesn't push the story forward. All this film was made for was to show you how Nell tries to recover after the events of the first film. THATS IT! The scares are few and far between the story is just downright dumb from the beginning and you never really feel for any of the characters from the get go. I wouldn't recommend seeing this film even for the fans of the first one. Besides a daring opening sequence, a few moments of suspense and interesting character moments this movie is a complete fluke. The Last Exorcism accomplished a sense of true horror and dread. You actually felt for the characters. Part II I see more of as a Dark Comedy. You can't even take this movie seriously at times. It seems the only reason this sequel was made was because the first film made 100 million at the box office. Thats it!

3 out of 10 stars. This movie was just bad. Simple as that!
65 out of 101 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
only see the first part
saskpareki31 May 2020
Part 1 was so creative and good part 2 is Unnecessary and poor

dont bother seeing, it will ruin the movie.. just seems sloppy nothing special nothing good enough to get a 5
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The demon returns to take his host in The Last Exorcism II
rgblakey4 March 2013
Somehow the found footage genre still seems to be churning out films even though most of them are just bad. The Last Exorcism was one that worked pretty well as it made sense to the story and the overall film was executed pretty well, despite the lame ending. To no one's surprise the success of that film spawned a sequel that intelligently decided to move away from the found footage style and make it a normal movie that looks to be pretty cool, despite it's somewhat silly name.

The Last Exorcism II follows Nell as she tries to build a new life after escaping the events of the original film, but when things seem to be going well the evil that once possessed her returns to take back its host. Much like the Blair Witch Project, Exorcism decided to go this other route with its sequel, but unlike it tried to keep the story intact. The story is perfect for the direction to keep this story moving, but sadly the film doesn't offer all that much. If not for Ashley Bell, reprising her role, this film would have fallen apart fast. She is so great in this role delivering all the emotional torment and innocence needed to make this character work. Beyond here there is really little going on in this movie other than her wandering around Louisiana. We all know that the formula of the possession films is the slow build, but when we already have an established story and character there is no need for it to be this slow. The few moments of "haunting" that you do get work well enough, but nothing like the powerful imagery of the first film that made it stand out so much.

This is one of those sequels that wasn't needed but welcomed in hopes to make up for what they did with the silly ending of its predecessor. Make no mistake this isn't a horrible movie, it is actually still pretty entertaining on some levels, just doesn't push the limits like it should have. The ending proved to be a bit of an interesting direction to continue the series, but was just a bit too little too late to pack the punch it needed.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I wish I had read the User Review First
Ranbud3 March 2013
Never do I rate a movie 1, and the only reason I did on this movie as there was not the ability to rate it a zero or less. The Last Exorcism Part II is a complete waste of time. It is NOTHING like other Exorcism movies, nor is even come lose to being scary. About all you get out of this is a lot of deep looking facial expressions by Ashley Bel who plays Nell. I was so disappointed in that there was nothing really scary, some possessed people who just talk scary, yet the demon is never really there. The scenes were so disjointed, and after 30 minutes, I felt like OK, this has gone so slow up until now, something really scary is going to happen next... I was mistaken. After 45 minutes, I waited, after an hour, I waited, then figuring that this was going to be a great and scary ending.. I waited.. Then the credits roll! ARE you freaking kidding me? This has to be the G rated version of scary movies of all time. Like another review hit on, the only reason it seems that this movie was made was to pry money from those that saw the first movie and thinking this will be a continuation of that. Here is the fact of life, if you go see this movie thinking it is a scary or demonic movie, the Joke will be on you as the movie maker laughs all the way to the bank.
46 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love Means Never Having to Say You're Possessed
Michael_Elliott28 February 2013
The Last Exorcism Part II (2013)

BOMB (out of 4)

Shortly after the events in the first film, survivor Nell (Ashley Bell) tries to put her life back together as well as she can but she soon realizes that whatever was wrong with her is still there and coming back for more. THE LAST EXORCISM PART II is without question one of the worst horror films I've seen theatrically in a very long time. Year after year bad horror films are released but this here is at the very bottom of the barrel. After a quick look at the events in the previous film, we're introduced to an incredibly unscary pre-credit sequence, which pretty much tells you we're in for a dud. There's not a single thing that happens in this film that is scary. The majority of the attempted scares come from soft music playing before there's a loud bang with loud noises. This cliché is just so boring and so tiresome that you wish people would stop using it. Director Ed Gass-Donnelly deserves a lot of the blame because there's just nothing interesting here. The visuals are all rather boring and predictable. There's not a bit of atmosphere to be found anywhere. For a horror movie the lack of scares is a major disappointment but what makes them even worse is that they're all so poorly staged and delivered. The screenplay also deserves a lot of blame. As with the first film, this one here has a lot of character development early on. We see Nell struggling to get on with her life. We see her at work cleaning hotel rooms. We see her fall for a boy and we see her and her girlfriends going for walks. After a while you start to wonder if the filmmakers forgot they were making a horror film. I don't mind character development but none of the characters here are all that interesting and this includes Nell. Not for a second did I care what happened to her and I certainly didn't care to find out the secrets behind the first film. The performances aren't too bad but did you really come here for that? THE LAST EXORCISM PART II is a really horrid sequel to a decent movie. It's funny but the first movie came to a close with a horrid ending and then this film pretty much picked up that horrid and carried it to a new level. And don't even get me started on the ending here.
33 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Even the evil spirits will be bored by this film
jefflouvre-435-7736714 March 2013
New Pope Francis 1 should ban exorcism films as they insult the intelligence of viewers.

This film is so boring and derivative. What's the big deal about Nell floating above her bed.

She hears the usual weird noises and sees funny things, typical in all exorcism films.

This film plods along at a leisurely pace until the exorcism, which is so weird that you have to see it to believe it.

WHO brings a heart monitor, a chicken and salt to an exorcism???? Ha ha.

www.jeffleemovies.com
35 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
terrible film with no point to seeing it.
bmorecraftyyt6 March 2013
The Last Exorcism Part II (2013)

Shortly after the events in the first film, survivor Nell tries to put her life back together as well as she can but she soon realizes that whatever was wrong with her is still there and coming back for more. this film is without question one of the worst horror films I've seen in a very long time. Year after year bad horror films are released but this here is at the very bottom of the barrel. After a quick look at the events in the previous film, we're introduced to an incredibly unsecured pure-credit sequence, which pretty much tells you we're in for a dud. There's not a single thing that happens in this film that is scary. The majority of the attempted scares come from soft music playing before there's a loud bang with loud noises. This cliché is just so boring and so tiresome that you wish people would stop using it. Director Ed Gass- Donnelly deserves a lot of the blame because there's just nothing interesting here. The visuals are all rather boring and predictable. There's not a bit of atmosphere to be found anywhere. For a horror movie the lack of scares is a major disappointment but what makes them even worse is that they're all so poorly staged and delivered. The screenplay also deserves a lot of blame. As with the first film, this one here has a lot of character development early on. We see Nell struggling to get on with her life. We see her at work cleaning hotel rooms. We see her fall for a boy and we see her and her girlfriends going for walks. After a while you start to wonder if the filmmakers forgot they were making a horror film. I don't mind character development but none of the characters here are all that interesting and this includes Nell. Not for a second did I care what happened to her and I certainly didn't care to find out the secrets behind the first film. The performances aren't too bad but did you really come here for that? the film is a really horrid sequel to a decent movie. It's funny but the first movie came to a close with a horrid ending and then this film pretty much picked up that horrid and carried it to a new level. And don't even get me started on the ending here.

1/5 Stars

Bmorecrafty-Bmorebloger
28 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Nutshell Review: The Last Exorcism Part II
DICK STEEL7 April 2013
This sequel will go down as one of those that have gone horribly off tangent to its source material and original, which is a pity because the first film had a solid finale which left it as a cliffhanger of sorts, but this direct follow up junked every good thing about the movie in no less than 5 minutes into the film, and had everything go downhill after that. For writer- director Ed Gass-Donnelly, I'm sorry to say that while you have had good intentions and decided to forward the story without the use of the found-footage gimmick, I wonder why you didn't choose to be less derivative from classics such as Carrie and Firestarter.

The first film worked because of a couple of reasons. First and foremost, it was a compelling premise, where a jaded pastor-conman decided to spill the beans in his profession, and herein lies the actual reason that it was found-footage because of an embedded documentary crew that followed him around while he exposed the secrets in his shady trade. Then there's proper character building, where we empathized with Cotton Marcus (Patrick Fabian), and understood why he decided to make good the wrongs in his life, and this worked into a tale of faith. Then the antagonist, spearheaded by Ashley Bell's wonderful portrayal as Nell, contained all ingredients necessary that blended horror and mystery together, plus her ability to contort herself in all angles imaginable. And who can forget that goosebumps raising finale.

Not a lot of people took to that film of course, but it worked well for me. Then came Gass- Donnelly and his idea of continuing directly where the first film left off, was quite brilliant. Naturally there isn't any reason to pursue this in found footage again, so the major decision was to come up with a straight narrative film, following Nell as she ends up in a girls' home, since she did not bear any memories on what had happened in the final few moments of the first film. And here is where everything turned south as far as the story went. We get introduced to characters who were as flimsy as they were cardboard, and a romance that was totally flat from the get go.

Yes we know that Nell is given every opportunity to assimilate back to normal society, but this was boring as hell when translated for the big screen, because there wasn't much emotions involved, and made it look very artificial, with scenes included because they just should. There were attempts to spook the audience, but even this relied on the tried and tested techniques which didn't offer anything new, especially when threats were issued usually through scratchy voices that may have come from imagination. To add further insult, there wasn't much of a "last" exorcism here, so the title was nothing more than to remotely link this film to the previous one, which had every reason to be "last", because well, that's what had happened. Here, while the exorcism performed was of a different style, it was so small a portion of screen time that it was quite negligible, especially its outcome.

What made it worthwhile was went Gass-Donnelly shifted gears to add a sense of urgency into the narrative in the final act, and things were really looking up especially when we had Nell confront her inner demons, and pick a side to root for. But then the brakes got applied again when you suddenly realize that the director had gone the direction of films such as Carrie and Firestarter, both written by Stephen King, and you wonder whether that's all that Gass-Donnelly can do, to become nothing more than a derivative of those two works. This film could have been labeled as "Nell" and perhaps it may win over some thought that it's about the misadventures of a possessed character, rather than the process to get her exorcised for good. Rewatching the first film will give you better value, and thrills.
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good horror flick!
sal1085111 June 2013
Nell Sweetzer tries to rebuild her life right after the events depicted in the first film. Now living in home for girls she tries to forget the horrific events she experienced only to find out that they are all too real.

This is a good sequel to the first in which the demons true intentions are revealed. It uses classic horror tactics and stays away from the traditional exorcism films. The plot was well grounded and the acting specially from Ashley Bell was outstanding. This was not filmed in the found footage style which adds more depth to the story. The ending to this film was definitely my favorite part and I enjoyed this good old fashioned horror flick.

I was rather skeptical at first due to the low ratings on IMDb but I keep forgetting that horror films are not for everyone but if you do enjoy them this is a must see!! 7/10.
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Deceptive Conclusion of an Unnecessary Sequel
claudio_carvalho20 September 2013
The seventeen year-old Nell Margareth Sweetzer (Ashley Bell) is found completely insane and obsessed by the demon Abalam. After medical and psychological treatment, she is sent to the Deveraux transition house in New Orleans managed by Frank Merle (Muse Watson), who helps her to start a new life. She finds a job of hotel housekeeper; befriends her roommates; and has a crush on the teenager Chris (Spencer Treat Clark). But soon she is haunted by people from her cult and by an evil force that wants to possess her. When Nell meets Cecile (Tarra Riggs), she tells that she has been following Nell since the hospital. Further, she discloses that she belongs to the sect Order of Right Hand that can protect her from the evil and Nell goes to her house. Will Nell be protected from the powerful evil force?

"The Last Exorcism Part II" is an unnecessary sequel of "The Last Exorcism". The movie is not so bad as described in many reviews, but the conclusion is a great deception. Ashley Bell has good performance but the story is weak and pointless. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): "O Último Exorcismo - Parte 2" ("The Last Exorcism Part 2")
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You'll be missing out if you read the negative reviews
bennett_1231 August 2013
I'm really confused as to why this has received such bad user reviews, i'll admit the title of this film kinda contradicts itself but i honestly believe this was an attempt to redeem the crappiness of the first movie, and it succeeded! Afterall "Evil Dead" had a sequel because the first one was rubbish and thats one of the best movies out there.. This isn't your typical possession film where you watch your generic 19 year old girl speak in a monotone demonic voice and you don't really care what happens to her because you've seen it a hundred time before. The girl in this you will actually feel sorry for, she is being taunted by the demon though everything thats actually good in her life and it's a shame, coupled with the fact she is a really good actress makes it a decent film, it tries to inspire emotion through flashbacks which is a really nice touch too. It will also become clear why it's called "The Last Exorcism" too! These negative reviews obviously come from people who had the whole script written in their heads before they pressed play, and it's a shame that their disappointment may affect others that just want to watch a movie and be surprised! Anyway it's 80 minutes and it's a pretty decent film, give it a shot if you have the time
27 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
terrible
trashgang6 November 2013
After the millions that made The Last Exorcism the producers must have been cursed by some evil spirit to summon the money out of horror buffs to see this awful second entry into the story of Nell (Ashley Bell).

I thought that Ashley would show her abilities again of moving her body in weird ways but it just didn't happen. It's a slow builder, the evil entity comes slowly in the life of Nell but once it does it never develops. There's nothing frightening or nothing even works out fine here. After a while it even became rather boring. I don't understand that a ,name like Eli Roth, involved here didn't make it worth watching. And when things go wrong and Nell is getting possessed the evil is shown off-camera. The final was even laughable when Nell is driving away. The Last Exorcism part 2 was made just for the money, let the devil curse the producers. Luckily Ashley Bell looked believable.

Gore 0/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 0/5 Story 1/5 Comedy 0/5
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Shame on you CBS!
ihearthorrorfilm1 March 2013
The first problem with this movie is that it is PG-13. I think this movie could have been a million times better had it been rated R. This happens because the movie studios are only concerned with selling tickets instead of making a good film. I also want to make it clear that Ashley Bell is an amazingly talented actress. The way she portrays her innocence and confusion regarding what has happened to her is soul shaking. She really makes you feel every emotion that she is feeling. That being said, it is not her job to make the entire movie scary all by herself! The first movie was so good and solid, so creative… This movie is just lazy, unoriginal and disappointing. A huge let down to fans of the first and I can only describe it as being slightly better than a made for TV movie. The only thing I thought was entertaining about this movie was Ashley Bell's awesome acting skills. Other than that, the story had no substance and when you finally get to the end, they treat it with kid gloves when they could have gone seriously terrifying. Huge disappointment. The only reason I give it a half decent rating is because Bell was so good.

Please like me on Facebook! We love getting suggestions and warnings on everything horror: http://www.facebook.com/pages/I-Heart-Horror/338327476286206
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Repent...?
vampiri1 June 2013
I had my doubts about this Movie, but I do not feel any repentance

watching it. Part one is mostly shot in POV which is, I Think, very limiting dramaturgically since you are forced to tell the story through the person holding the camera. Part two, however, is shot in conventional third person.

Plot: possessed girl from part one struggles to reintegrate into society, but pieces from her past make it difficult.

The problem with this sub-genre is that it is hard to reinvent and to make it look "fresh". Disregarding the title, the devilry, so to speak, is fairly subtle, at least more subtle than my countryman's (Mikael Håfström) the Rite which is over the top but otherwise well-made. There are some illogical moves as well, for example how the girl is approached by the supposed exorcists.

However, all in all it is a good low budget flick with descent acting and sfx.

I'll give it 5 out of 10 since it lacks real suspense and that the Movie fails to create sympathy for the lead role.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Really not good...
Thanos_Alfie19 January 2014
"The Last Exorcism Part II" is a really not good sequel of "The Last Exorcism" movie of 2010. In this movie we have again Ashley Bell who after the first movie in which the evil force has possessed her and finally left her now it returns.

I did not like this movie because I think that it is not the sequel which many people expected to be and because it was really awful. This movie makes you believe at the beginning of it that it will be a nice movie but after that you will change your mind.

Finally I have to tell you that if you want to have a comprehensive view of this movie sequel you have to see it and then regret it.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It must have been hard to make a film this dull
bowmanblue31 August 2014
Okay, I try to do a little more than just blatantly slag off a film, but with 'The Last Exorcism Part II' it's kind of hard not to.

I didn't expect to enjoy the first film and, amazingly, I was in for a pleasant surprise. It may have been a 'found footage' film, but it was enjoyably creepy, despite being an overused genre about an overused subject matter.

Therefore, based on the first movie alone, I decided to watch the sequel. I really wish I hadn't. It's a completely different type of film for a start, i.e. not 'found footage.' I guess the film-makers wanted not to just do a rehash of the first movie and try something different. What they came up with was simply one of the more boring films ever made.

We follow the girl from the first story, now trying to lead a normal life. But she can't. The spirit she fought before wants to be in her again. Things bump around wherever she goes, therefore, in turn, making her jump. That's about it. She has a gaggle of female friends who do little more than giggle and make clichéd remarks. Plus there's a love interest for out main lead. It adds nothing to the plot, other than detracting yet further from anything vaguely scary.

The Last Exorcism (part one) was nothing that special, but at least it was watchable enough to be enjoyable (if you like low budget horror flicks). Part II, on the other hand, is just dull with no redeeming features.

Maybe I should have known better than to watch a sequel to a film with the word 'last' in the title. Dear film-makers, PLEASE make part II the absolute last this time. I won't be watching 'The Last Last Last Exorcism' if it ever sees the light of day.

http://thewrongtreemoviereviews.blogspot.co.uk/
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Troll movie
paoloribas4 August 2013
Well, I'm not a filmmaker but I'm pretty sure this has got to be technically one of the worst movies ever made.

Although I think the 1st one is actually a pretty decent movie with a good mystery plot and a good opinion on a faithless preacher, this sequel seems more like a troll movie they released just to laugh at how many people would actually pay to watch this lazy piece of work.

It is like they only had a loose idea on the plot and just decided to fill in some random scenes until they achieved 90min of footage. There are many scenes which just doesn't make any sense followed one by another, and when you see a horror movie trying to scare you with a barking dog in a daylight street scene, you know you've reached a new low standard.

Its pretty sad to see movies this bad being released. This seriously shouldn't even be considered "professional work". Don't waste time with this movie.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No better or worse then the first
atinder14 April 2013
I did not like the first one at all, I thought one of most boring movies I Have seen, Did not once get scared or creeped out at all, I thought it was The Worst Exorcism movie but then we suffered for even worse with Devil Inside 2 years later!

Least this Last Exorcism 1 had some scarce scenes at least and tense moment in (Which Didn't work for me as saw them coming) and there in that movie unlike Devil inside and this sequel to the first movie

Nell is trying to put her life back together and she has blocked out all things that happens to her in the first movie but soon they what her back again.

This was really bland from start to end, there was not one moment that actually felt anything scary was going to happen any where in the movie,

The only good think I can say about this movie is that, last 10 minutes of the movie was so-what watch able and something was finally hap ping in the movie and again it wasn't that scary at all and most of that scene see the trailer .

I didn't mind the movie ended but story didn't really end!

Yet another movie that show 95% of movie in trailer, Just watch the trailer skip this movie

One other good think I can say about this movie is that the acting was really good from the cast but shame about the rest of the bland movie.

3 out of 10
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
My Review Of "The Last Exorcism Part II"
ASouthernHorrorFan3 March 2013
"The Last Exorcism Part II" continues the story of Nell and the demon who wants her-Abalam. With a new director but the same actress as the first film, Ashley Bell. "Part II" is straight up horror story telling in a classic format. There is no documentary style footage present save the internet shot of the footage from the first film so the opportunity to really utilize basic but brilliant gimmicks for shock and thrills are very well in hand for this film. Which I think the director managed to use quite well without being too obvious or any real "fail" issue for the most part. The story has Nell moved to New Orleans and on her way to rehabilitation for a new start with new friends. However Abalam is not done with the young girl and there will be no salvation for her in the city.

As far as the film's ability to bring the scares I have to say that the film did it's job. There were moments that normally would not have been scary nor interesting in the film but because the director utilized the trick of closed in frame shots, in most of the scenes, random moments became thrilling. The story is more focused and open to the viewer with no real hidden plot, which allows for more imagery and dogma that surround the whole possession culture. It allows for a more mystical icon-ism to play a big part in staging the story. It is a true classic horror story in all ways. That normally would seem like a bad thing but thankfully this director knew how to shoot the film and set up the moments that needed to be scary or exaggerated enough to make the movie work. Until the ending of course. That I have issue with. I appreciated the twist that says not every one gets a Hallmark moment but for me it came off cheesy and that boiled down to the use of CGI when more organic FX would have came off better for what the director was going for. "The Last Exorcism Part II" is a better story and movie than the first film but the first film had a way better ending. There must be a third film in the works because there where some elements of the over all story that were only vaguely highlighted and need to be unveiled in this character's grander story.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Had potential, but failed to deliver.
Michael-Hallows-Eve12 June 2013
>> MINI REVIEW << This film was just as average as the first. I was hoping it would be an improvement on the first, but I soon realized it wasn't. The story was nothing ground breaking, the "horror action" was lacking as I was wanting more blood or something, but it was like it was cut or something as every time you thought you'd see some gore, it would either pan away from the action or not show you anything. But what was I expecting when the film is only rated PG-13. My fault I guess. But this movie could have been something better if they had made it a higher rating and showed more carnage in my opinion. So I was disappointed by this film, so all I can give it is a 4 out of 10, because it had potential.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The type of flick most horror fans would say is 'so bad it's good'.
Hellmant13 March 2013
'THE LAST EXORCISM PART II': Three Stars (Out of Five)

Sequel to the 2010 supernatural horror film about a minister being followed by a documentary crew while he performs his last exorcism. This film takes place directly after the original and focuses on Nell Sweetzer, who was the girl being exorcised in the first film (and one of it's sole survivors). This installment is not filmed in the found footage format though and centers around Nell now living in a home for girls, while still possessed. The film was once again produced by indie horror master Eli Roth but it was directed and co-written this time (with Damien Chazelle) by Ed Gass-Donnelly (another indie filmmaker). The film is not nearly as inventive or fun as the original but it is a decent sequel and not nearly as bad as a lot of the reviews it's been getting.

After a series of flashes from the first film, reminding us what mostly took place, we find Nell (once again played by Ashley Bell) sneaking into a couple's home late at night in New Orleans. She's catatonic and animalistic when the couple turns her over to a local hospital. She's then placed in a home for girls ran by Frank Merle (Muse Watson). She makes friends with the other girls staying there, lead by the mischievous Gwen (Julia Garner), and even garners the attention of a young man named Chris (Spencer Treat Clark, who was the kid in 'UNBREAKABLE' and also appeared in 'GLADIATOR' and 'MYSTIC RIVER' at about the same age). She gets a job at a local motel as well and everything seems to finally be going good for her but those annoying demons just won't let her alone and continue to harass her throughout the rest of the film.

The movie is cheesy of course but it's supposed to be; it's a B horror film! It's much better than a lot of other crap out there that gets much better reviews (I personally found it a lot more entertaining than the 'PARANORMAL ACTIVITY' films). It's a bad movie but it's amusing and it's the type of flick most horror fans would say is 'so bad it's good'. It of course doesn't live up to the original but that had it's haters as well (I personally loved the original film). Bell is very good in the lead role once again and the directing is decent for this sort of film. The script is about what you'd expect from a movie called 'THE LAST EXORCISM PART II' as well. I saw the movie as part of a double feature (I created, at Regal's $5 movie night) with the youth gone wild party film '21 & OVER'. This wasn't as good as the latter but it was nostalgic and a lot of fun to see two 80s style teen movies (a B horror film and a youth sex/party flick). If nothing else it's at least good for that.

Watch our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH2nsN_uuBI
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite pssobly the worst movie ever!
jordangill-8845221 February 2019
Nothing happens in this movie. No characters, no plot, no suspense. It's honeslty probably the most pointless and annoying thing (because I refused to call this thing a movie) you can watch. It's a movie that if you watch it, your actually better of cause then you can actually appreciate the good movies more when they come around. Despite this I implore you to just ignore this movie and pretend it never existed. You'll save a hell of a lot of valuable time.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An Exorcise in Bad Movie-making
shaososa12 August 2013
If you were one of the many viewers of The Last Exorcism who was pleasantly surprised at it in terms of quality and scariness, consider me among your peers. Joining the ranks of movies like REC and Troll Hunter, The Last Exorcism was another example of the strengths of using the mockumentary/found footage style popular in horror today. These films dictate that less can be more when conveying scares. The Last Exorcism Part II, however, is an example of how building on those successes with a bigger budget and wider platform does not equal automatic quality. In fact, The Last Exorcism II is just terrible.

The story continues the tale of Nell, the subject of the doomed documentary of the first Last Exorcism. We last saw Nell held captive at some kind of satanic ritual before the film ended in grim fashion. In the follow up, time has fast forwarded some and Nell has not only somehow survived the events of The Last Exorcism, but she has escaped to the big city and been placed in a halfway house for troubled women. At first it seems like she may be able to move beyond her troubled past, until of course "creepy" events transpire that show things clearly aren't getting better.

There really is nothing redeeming here at all. As the plot develops, viewers are treated to run of the mill scare tactics that were played out the last ten times they were copied in equally abysmal films. Any semblance of creativity that was present in the original Last Exorcism has been replaced with economy rate, cookie cutter filmmaking. The end result is so yawn and eye roll inducing that it could easily make my most disappointing sequel list of all time.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I hope this has indeed been "The Last."
jabandrade26 January 2014
The first The Last Exorcism had some attraction. Maybe because it was new, maybe the idea of ​​camera in hands cause some tension, committed actors, motivated direction. But the small success seems that rose to the head of the producers of this 2nd movie. Apparently it was thrown on the market anyway, relying on the "charisma" of Ashley Bell, which, face it, is not enough to carry a movie. Thus, poor direction, cast idem and shallow script as a saucer resulted in a little less than lousy movie. The lack of imagination and objectives is visible all the time. No suspense, everything is predictable. The "exorcism" itself is unworthy of the worst movies of possession. And the final verged on the ridiculous, with special effects of 5th grade. The producers, please , ask God to help make the next movie.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Can I sue people for wasting my time...?
zach-tiefling5 August 2013
...apparently not.

To be honest, it didn't waste all of my time, because I dozed off on my first viewing.

This is NOT an exaggeration. I LITERALLY fell asleep, while watching this movie.

So I had to re-watch it, while battling myself, not to play with my smart-phone, read twitter, surf the web, check if my attempt of fixing the dripping tap in the kitchen worked, watch the paint on the carport dry or cut my front-lawn with a nail clipper...

...in other words, this movie is boring. It picture is a tedious waste of time and it's only reason why it was made, is to cash-in on the moderate success of a decent horror-movie. The most annoying thing is, that the basic idea behind its plot is really clever but the execution... is exactly that: An execution.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed