2000 Mules (2022) User Reviews

Propganda Masked as Journalism

[gregorycbacon · 5/10 · 11 May 2022]

Journalism has fallen to the wayside. Journalism is no longer a search for the truth or an understanding of a situation. It's become a marketing tool for businesses and organizations. This is movie attempts to create the portrayal of a documentary, but is a large group of Republican commentators and politicians talking amongst themselves. Although some of the individuals take a neutral stance to the subject there is no rebuttal or understanding of the situation, only an agenda pushed onto the viewer. A lot of the points made would hold validity if they had sources. Most of the information is given as an opinion on a person's behavior or given by a dark anonymous figure. It's not strong enough to change anyone's mind or opinion. Anyone that have an opinion will only dig further in their stance and anyone looking for more information will leave more confused than informed.

Initially was convinced of veracity until I read counter-points

[hksteinman · 6/10 · 3 June 2022]

Full disclaimer: I voted for Trump twice and believe there was 2020 election fraud.

Yet, this movie is low on some important specifics.

Irrespective of the voter fraud topic, the documentary provides very disconcerting evidence of how much we are geo-tracked and how available our every daily move (with a phone) is documented and available for sale. It is worth seeing if only for that.

The fraud evidence D'Souza presents, in the moment while watching the movie is compelling, and many left convinced that there were 10's of thousands of potential mules funded by Soros, Zuckerberg, and others.

I was less convinced and feel some of his experts data and explanations were vague. More importantly, he left out some very compelling evidence and information he should have had.

1) Despite his claims of extensive video documentation confirming his geolocation of mules going to at least 10 ballot drop boxes, he never shows the same mule at different boxes or using the same drop box more than once. This is my biggest concern.

2) His colleagues claim to interviewed mules, derived from their data, but offer no video or transcript evidence for this.

3) Despite claiming all mules went to "community centers" to pick up ballots, no categories, types, or names of any center is named.

4) He provides no documentation of how, from whom, and how much any mules were paid, with the exception of one woman who didn't provide specifics. He never specifically "follows the money."

5) He does claim that of the hundreds of millions of dollars Zuckerberg and others are known to have contributed to foster voter turnout, his expert doesn't explain how stare government agencies responsible for drop boxes received and spent these monies, which is available public data. (Or, did I miss that?)

So, some compelling evidence, lots and lots of smoke, but limited data on some important specifics.i.

Some good some bad

[kabeerkher · 5/10 · 7 November 2022]

This documentary provides ample evidence that fraudulent votes were being cast. You can clearly see that from the behaviour of the people caught on video. You can also see it from their movements which were tracked using mobile phone data.

However it does not provide any evidence of who was behind the fraudulent votes. It also doesn't prove how the fraudsters were able to obtain genuine ballot papers to be used fraudulently, although it does speculate as to how that may have been possible.

Therefore it is difficult to call this a smoking gun. But certainly it proves the point that the voting system needs to be a lot more secure.

Sleight of Hand

[mcsears · 7 May 2022]

The film appears to prove that batches of ballots were dropped into ballot boxes. No evidence if offered about the contents of those votes. We never see the actual ballots. They might just as well have been for Trump as for Biden.

Plus, if those ballots actually were illegitimate, that calls into question not only the Presidential vote but ALL the votes all the way down the ballot. If the votes were fraudulant, then no Senator or Representative or Governor elected in 2020 has been eleced legitimately. And why only the swing states??? Think about it.

Fantastic comedy.

[khcunningham · 10/10 · 26 June 2022]

Hilarious, had me in stitches. Very very funny...its made like a real documentary, and if you didnt know how utterly impossible the garbage the fake documentary team were pedaling you'd miss this satirical genius of this movie.

Irrefutably irrefutable - to the irredeemably deluded

[senderrobey · 1/10 · 23 July 2022]

Trumpers love to call baseless claims of election fraud "irrefutable". The less basis, the more irrefutable. You see the same here. Out of his ballyhooed 4 million minutes of dropbox video, D'Souza only shows a few single people dropping single ballots into a single box. Except for one person - more on him below.

So he chose several clips which could be handwaved into looking "suspicious" and the cast tries desperately to do that.

-- A couple folks bring only one ballot but have to deal with one that falls out of the box... so these are spoken of as having brought several.

-- Kinda shaky so "let's look at another mule"... This one tosses her gloves in the trash BUT doesn't first look around for the bin. So she's obviously a hardened criminal who had cased the joint earlier and slyly planned her (single) ballot drop far in advance... unaware that she could simply have mailed it in to avoid the video cameras.

-- When government workers empty the box we are told sadly "Look at that... so many ballots" - as if they're all somehow fake!

The deception and absurdity abounds. The ONLY video D'Souza has of someone dropping off more than one ballot is a man legally bringing in all of them for his family. D'Souza tells us that we are watching a crime in progress and that those are "fraudulent ballots". A total lie.

Not having ANY videos of multiple ballots dropped at multiple boxes, D'Souza has an actor do that! Complete with hoodie and frightened expression, and spilling "ballots" out of his backpack as he "stuffs" them into boxes. So we'll be sure to get the idea.

Having all this irrefutable (baseless) evidence of mulery, D'Souza simply multiplies the mules we (didn't) see by the number of ballots they (weren't) carrying and the number of boxes they (didn't) go to, and finds there were hundreds of thousands!

He has to invent a source for all of these: non-profit community shelters and 4H homes bamboozling hundreds of thousands of their residents!

Nothing is too spectacularly absurd for him to say. He "proves" this by claiming that cellphone data has shown that thousands of people (the mules, remember) not only were near those places but also went near a dropbox! Of course nobody can see his analysis... just take his word for it.

All this irrefutable evidence is the more irrefutable because it rests on the word of a convicted election campaign fraud felon: D'Souza. Whom Donald Trump pardoned btw.

So as promised: irrefutably irrefutable. Deny that, you deniers! America, we have a problem!

Truth revealed: clowns control the elections

[zhivago97 · 10/10 · 24 November 2022]

Finally someone exposed the truth about killer clowns from outer space controlling the election process. Never before has someone gone into so much factual detail and exposed so many never before told secrets about how the government is ultimately controlled by these killer clowns who came from outer space in the 1980's (there's another documentary about that of you look it up). And they aren't costumed clowns either, that is how they are born, with red noses and rainbow hair and giant feet etc.

The scary part is that not only do these clowns destroy fair elections, but they erect circus tents that ultimately trap well meaning citizens attempting to vote and send them into outer space! Mars? Jupiter? Pluto?

Only the Dark Lord Himself in Palm Beach knows the truth. That's why he needs to hide Top Secret and Highly Classified government documents in his manse. Those documents expose more truths, including the fact that consuming buttered popcorn causes people to vote for democrats! And it's obviously because of the long history between democrats and Hollywood, buttered popcorn is the link. Finally someone makes the connection in this documentary.

This documentary is all very factual and thoroughly detailed. The only chance for hope is for everyone to stop eating buttered popcorn and to avoid circus tents, or they will become kidnapped by the clowns and shot into space forevermore. We must all serve the Dark Lord by doing everything he commands, because only he can make America great again. This documentary sums up everything you need to know about how Washington really works and why there is little time left to save America.

Most 10-star reviewers didn't really watch this

[dannymorra · 1/10 · 26 July 2022]

And neither did most folks rating it 10 stars. They couldn't have. Because from the get-go it's an ultra-biased hack job that just makes up a story as it goes along, and never proves a bit of it. The surveillance vids of drop boxes just show ordinary people dropping off a ballot. That's all. The hooded guy sneaking around with a backpack and no timestamps on his video is obviously a fake. And all the cellphone data we hear about is never shown. Except for demo screens that flash by which it turns out have wrong drop box locations, and with one in Russia for chrissake. Then there's how the zillion ballots they've dreamed up for their imaginary mules must have come from 501c3 organizations like nursing homes. Sure, 400 thousand seniors voted for Biden. As if. Oh wait they were tricked into doing it? So why haven't we heard about that? It's all beyond belief, and the actors pretending to believe it act like puppets. Which I guess they are.

If IMBd thinks this Documentary is also a "Fantasy" film

[praisngod82 · 10/10 · 9 November 2022]

So many of us 'critical thinkers' already knew something like this took place Nov 2020. It was nice to see the actual proof. I read some of the 'troll' reviews stating that this is not evidence: people have been convicted and sentenced to death in 'circumstantial evidence' cases with less non-evidence. I guess it just depends on how much critical thinking (or thinking) you do.

Thank you Mr. D'Souza for your great faith, personal sacrifice and hard work you put into producing and uncovering these crimes might make a difference; as well as wake up our zombie nation. My prayers are always with you and your family.

Makes you think stuff is wrong - until you DO think

[saldorman · 1/10 · 2 July 2022]

Cleverly staged to mask the fact that there's NO actual evidence! Nothing illegal is actually stated for Arizona. The people going to drop boxes aren't doing anything wrong. The one guy driving around with a bag of ballots is an actor. There are no verifications anywhere of the geotracking work. The scenes about non-profits is just what they "might" be doing... and are ridiculous. When you take all those out - there's nothing left.

A Must See

[amsmith41-1 · 10/10 · 23 November 2022]

This documentary is an in-depth - your eyes don't lie in exposing just how corrupt this country's voting system has become - and how truly compromised our government is to foreign lobbyists, powerful elites, and cartels. I think it all started with the "hanging chads." So happy this was brought to light. Pay attention.

While Big Media will dismiss this as "fabricated nonsense," or a God-forbid "conspiracy theory." The producers of this film did their due diligence in recording the actual crimes committed. I recommend this superb documentary to anyone who still professes to have an open mind, politics aside.

I wish it showed more..

[ham-ma242 · 7/10 · 8 May 2022]

The documentary could have been done better and showed more evidence, because I've seen it with my own eyes. Though overall it's a great documentary to inspire in asking questions and shows how both sides react to the problem. One side says "it's all good, most secure" and the evidence shows that no it isn't. Better questions are why factcheckers are denouncing evidence and everybody else when they see it? MKultra at its finest.

Totally spurious and false

[kexxxy-19105 · 11 May 2022]

It's very disturbing to see so many people praising this film. Follow this link to read a comprehensive debunking of this complete false and very dangerous documentary by an extreme right wing director, Here is a comprehensive debunking from The Associated Press

CLAIM: At least 2,000 "mules" were paid to illegally collect ballots and deliver them to drop boxes in key swing states ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

THE FACTS: True the Vote didn't prove this. The finding is based on false assumptions about the precision of cellphone tracking data and the reasons that someone might drop off multiple ballots, according to experts.

"Ballot harvesting" is a pejorative term for dropping off completed ballots for people besides yourself. The practice is legal in several states but largely illegal in the states True the Vote focused on, with some exceptions for family, household members and people with disabilities.

True the Vote has said it found some 2,000 ballot harvesters by purchasing $2 million worth of anonymized cellphone geolocation data - the "pings" that track a person's location based on app activity - in various swing counties across five states. Then, by drawing a virtual boundary around a county's ballot drop boxes and various unnamed nonprofits, it identified cellphones that repeatedly went near both ahead of the 2020 election.

If a cellphone went near a drop box more than 10 times and a nonprofit more than five times from Oct. 1 to Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a "mule" - its name for someone engaged in an illegal ballot collection scheme in cahoots with a nonprofit.

The group's claims of a paid ballot harvesting scheme are supported in the film only by one unidentified whistleblower said to be from San Luis, Arizona, who said she saw people picking up what she "assumed" to be payments for ballot collection. The film contains no evidence of such payments in other states in 2020.

Plus, experts say cellphone location data, even at its most advanced, can only reliably track a smartphone within a few meters - not close enough to know whether someone actually dropped off a ballot or just walked or drove nearby.

"You could use cellular evidence to say this person was in that area, but to say they were at the ballot box, you're stretching it a lot," said Aaron Striegel, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Notre Dame. "There's always a pretty healthy amount of uncertainty that comes with this." What's more, ballot drop boxes are often intentionally placed in busy areas, such as college campuses, libraries, government buildings and apartment complexes - increasing the likelihood that innocent citizens got caught in the group's dragnet, Striegel said.

Similarly, there are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might be visiting both a nonprofit's office and one of those busy areas. Delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers and elected officials all have legitimate reasons to cross paths with numerous drop boxes or nonprofits in a given day.

True the Vote has said it filtered out people whose "pattern of life" before the election season included frequenting nonprofit and drop box locations. But that strategy wouldn't filter out election workers who spend more time at drop boxes during the election season, cab drivers whose daily paths don't follow a pattern, or people whose routines recently changed.

In some states, in an attempt to bolster its claims, True the Vote also highlighted drop box surveillance footage that showed voters depositing multiple ballots into the boxes. However, there was no way to tell whether those voters were the same people as the ones whose cellphones were anonymously tracked.

A video of a voter dropping off a stack of ballots at a drop box is not itself proof of any wrongdoing, since most states have legal exceptions that let people drop off ballots on behalf of family members and household members.

For example, Larry Campbell, a voter in Michigan who was not featured in the film, told The Associated Press he legally dropped off six ballots in a local drop box in 2020 - one for himself, his wife, and his four adult children. And in Georgia, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office investigated one of the surveillance videos circulated by True the Vote and said it found the man was dropping off ballots for himself and his family.

CLAIM: In Philadelphia alone, True the Vote identified 1,155 "mules" who illegally collected and dropped off ballots for money.

THE FACTS: No, it didn't. The group hasn't offered any evidence of any sort of paid ballot harvesting scheme in Philadelphia. And True the Vote did not get surveillance footage of drop boxes in Philadelphia, so the group based this claim solely on cellphone location data, its researcher Gregg Phillips said in March in testimony to Pennsylvania state senators.

Pennsylvania state Sen. Sharif Street, who was there for the group's testimony in March, told the AP he was confident he was counted as several of the group's 1,155 anonymous "mules," even though he didn't deposit anything into a drop box in that time period.

Street said he based his assessment on the fact that he carries a cellphone, a watch with a cellular connection, a tablet with a cellular connection and a mobile hotspot - four devices whose locations can be tracked by private companies. He also said he typically travels with a staffer who carries two devices, bringing the total on his person to six.

During the 2020 election season, Street said, he brought those devices on trips to nonprofit offices and drop box rallies. He also drove by one drop box up to seven or eight times a day when traveling between his two political offices.

"I did no ballot stuffing, but over the course of time, I literally probably account for hundreds and hundreds of their unique visits, even though I'm a single actor in a single vehicle moving back and forth in my ordinary course of business," Street said.

City election commission spokesman Nick Custodio said the allegations matched others that had been debunked or disproven after the 2020 election.

"The Trump campaign and others filed an unprecedented litany of cases challenging Philadelphia's election with dubious and unsubstantiated allegations of fraud, all of which were quickly and resoundingly rejected by both state and federal courts," Custodio said.

CLAIM: Some of the "mules" True the Vote identified in Georgia were also geolocated at violent antifa riots in Atlanta in the summer of 2020, showing they were violent far left actors.

THE FACTS: Setting aside the fact that the film doesn't prove these individuals were collecting ballots at all, it also can't prove their political affiliations.

The anonymized data True the Vote tracked doesn't explain why someone might have been present at a protest demanding justice for Black deaths at the hands of police officers. The individuals who were tracked there could have been violent rioters, but they also could have been peaceful protesters, police or firefighters responding to the protests, or business owners in the area.

CLAIM: Alleged ballot harvesters were captured on surveillance video wearing gloves because they didn't want to leave their fingerprints on the ballots.

THE FACTS: This is pure speculation. It ignores far more likely reasons for glove-wearing in the fall and winter of 2020 - cold weather or COVID-19.

True the Vote's researcher claimed in the movie that voters in Georgia started wearing gloves to prevent their fingerprints from touching ballot envelopes after two women in Yuma, Arizona, were indicted on Dec. 23, 2020 for alleged ballot harvesting in that state's primary election. But the Arizona indictment didn't mention anything about fingerprints.

Voting in Georgia's Jan. 5, 2021, Senate runoff election occurred during some of the coldest weeks of the year in the state, and when COVID-19 was surging.

In fact, the AP in 2020 documented multipleexamples of COVID-cautious voters wearing latex gloves and other personal protective equipment to vote.

In a similarly speculative allegation, the film claims its supposed "mules" took photographs of ballots before they dropped them into drop boxes in order to get paid. But across the U. S., voters frequently take photos of their ballot envelopes before submitting them

It's so sad that people would rather believe this kind of sensationalist conspiracy nonsense than the evidence of dedicated professional investigators in the FBI and local police authorities who have exhaustively investigated all these claims. Sadly, the growingly extremist right wing are using the lie of a stolen election as an excuse to mount a concerted challenge to the democratic system itself. Across the country districts are being gerrymandered, voter lists suppressed, and Republican-controlled state legislatures are passing laws that will enable them to overturn legitimate results of elections. This is the real conspiracy. If you truly love the USA , campaign vigorously to preserve a free and fair election system.

Fact based movie of awesomeness

[ultra-04151 · 10/10 · 7 November 2022]

Anybody with half a brain knows there was shenanigans in the last presidential election. This movie points out major discrepancies in the election process and circumspect local policies in regards rules. All the accounts of supposed oversight and security come from the same party overseeing the process, usually in democratic led cities,these very cities in states that were so crucial in the outcome. The covid mandates became a means to an end for the Democrats. They used this "pandemic" for political gain. We had dead people voting for Christ sake. People no longer need to prove they're a citizen of the country?! So much harm was caused by mandates imposed,but this was the worst of all. And no one will ever apologize for any of it.

Why we have films like this

[billieclew · 1/10 · 28 June 2022]

This film essentially concocts a spy-movie plot, finds video clips that seem to support bits and pieces of that, and whips it into a gigantic conspiracy theory. And presents that to the viewer as "proven".

Look at the faked multi-dropbox scenes. Look at the faked dropbox screens (one in Moscow). Look at the unverified cellphone pattern charts. Look at the undated and therefore worthless whistleblower scene. Look at the innocent voters simply being called "criminals" by the panel! Listen to the unsupported fantasizing about "non-profits" victimizing hundreds of thousands of people.

Why do we have films like this? Late last year, when asked by an associate why he keeps pushing the Steal, Trump said: "It keeps my base motivated, and will help Republicans win".

So people like D'Souza and Phillips here are in demand. They can knock out conspiracy theory films like this on command, convincing countless people that their national election was stolen.

Censored

[PubChampion · 10/10 · 24 September 2022]

I agree with the authors that the evidence presented in the film shows that widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election did occur. For some reason, watching ballots stuffed into boxes is more convincing than believing ridiculous tales about Russian collusion. The film makes you think about what else might have been rigged in the land of the free and even more importantly, what else is going to be rigged next.

I would like to say more but the last time I did so they deleted my review. The censorship here is so tight that I would not be surprised if they pulled this review as well.

Like a scorpion... this creeps up, with poison in its tail

[tawdryleen · 1/10 · 8 July 2022]

Watch talking heads seem shocked at all the fraud (not) revealed. And amazed that this could (not) happen. Hear them mock regular people dropping off ballots. See them scowl at staged ballot drops, and bogus drop-box maps (of Moscow... oops). Finally, catch D'Souza solemnly conclude that the US is a "criminal cartel". Who was he trying to please with that line?

Well documented voter fraud

[benparkmd · 10/10 · 11 December 2022]

If you don't believe the recent Twitter releases then don't waste your time on this movie. No amount of evidence will open your closed mind.

The rest of you will find it fascinating. Using cell phone tracking from True The Vote, Dinesh lays out a compelling case for organized voter fraud complete with videos of ballots being dropped off at 3 AM by mules who wore gloves after an article detailing how other mules were arrested due to fingerprints on the ballots. Prior to this article none of the mules used gloves.

Watch it for yourself or read the book. The book does a great job of refuting the arguments against the movie in the other reviews.

Keep an open mind, and look at the evidence.

Whaaat??

[macidonovan · 1/10 · 27 June 2022]

So what are they telling us? The Arizona woman doesn't actually say that anything criminal happened. Ballot transport there was legal until recently and no dates are mentioned, go figure. The camera videos are nothing even though the speaker says it's all suspicious. He says the geo tracking is suspicious too but they never follow up with anybody real. Just suspicion, suspicion, suspicion without proof. And lots of drama acting. What they said about them solving murders turns out to be a lie. I think it's all a lie.

Reviews must have been done by bots

[RJShawIV-303-828480 · 10/10 · 10 November 2022]

Anyone noticed all reviews have just one star? What's the odds? LMAO Obviously reviews are all bots. I'd say this film is full of truth and what most people would say...."over the target." This is the kind of reviews sensitive liberals put out. They never could, never did, nor will they ever face the truth in anything they do. They think most people are too dumb to think for themself, therefore, they try to do the thinking for them. Be man, or person enough to watch this film yourself and YOU decide if it's truthful or not. I can't believe how corrupt our once great country was... and sad to say, will never return.

It's Not Evidence, But it Is Convincing To Get More Information

[statuskuo · 7/10 · 23 May 2022]

The final word is that states need to investigate their own voting practices

There is ample evidence to, at the very least, look into the accusations. Obviously Dinesh has a bone to pick with the Left. Simply because their behavior warrants it. Shady flip flops and constant badgering of society. The Left desperately wanted to defund the police, only to have them pretend they didn't. With this level of gaslighting, nothing could be trusted. Specifically 81 million votes for a man who can barely put together sentences. Caused a domino effect in foreign policy and imploded most of our economy. The result of this crime says more about the intention rather than the why?

Is this journalism? Who says it should be. Michael Moore of the Right, I suppose.

Incidentally, I got two ballots in the mail from the state of California. Address wrong for one. Yet, mail-in ballots are suppose to be infallible. I find a mistake on this level precisely why that system is comically flawed.

I reported the second ballot, the fraud agency said they'd get back to me. They never did. Demos are like the girlfriend that you dumped for gaining too much weight and spends their time stalking you to make sure you aren't happy.

My conclusion is - D'Souza thinks we're fools

[avifenton · 1/10 · 4 July 2022]

This film says there were 400,000 muled ballots. Which were actually valid signed ballots from real people but carried to drop boxes by thousands of mules - instead of being mailed, they don't say why. Which they say makes them illegal votes, which is flat wrong because they're still valid and from that real person. And nothing on why none of these thousands of mules have been heard from. Or the thousands of people working in the places they got the ballots. Which they say are like nursing homes and community shelters, who somehow tricked hundreds of thousands of residents into voting for Biden. I watched the whole thing, kinda, but quit trying to believe it even before I quit trying to understand it. Neither one is exactly easy.

Worthless waste of time

[mconstable-44185 · 9 May 2022]

Yeah, sure, I am a lefty, but I was prepared to look at the other side of the argument. This expose is full of holes and none of the "evidence" would stand up in a court of law in front of a judge under oath. For the very few here who may be curious, just type "fact check 2000 mules" into Google and do your own research.

How an election was rigged

[rottencorpse-360-739272 · 10/10 · 8 September 2022]

Wow... this is a power and factual look into the theft if the 2020 election. It was clear from the beginning, with all the evidence mounting, that someone would expose the corruption of the Femovrat regime and how they would do anything to steal an eye tion to push their radical agendas. The cover up is actually worse, when the Supreme Court wouldn't even look at the staggering amount of evidence and fraudulent activity during the election. Then the biased media refusing to report on the fact that so much fraud was detected, from ballot harvesting, to suitcases full of votes being pulled and counted AFTER the count watchers were sent home. This movie just further cements the reality of how corrupt Democrats, funded, implemented, and created the largest case of collusion, insurrection, and treason in american history.

The guy taking multiple ballots to multiple boxes is an ACTOR

[serongona · 1/10 · 7 July 2022]

THERE ARE NO videos of anyone taking ballots to more than one box! The producers are LYING when they say that, and by staging this without saying so!

And the cellphone patterns aren't verified by ANYONE. It's just D'Souza's word! After lying to us about the multiple boxes.

So the ENTIRE basis of this film is FALSE.

Then we're supposed to believe that nursing homes tricked HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of seniors into voting for Biden. On NO evidence.