Citadel (2012) Poster

(I) (2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
43 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
I obviously didn't get it
bowmanblue29 September 2014
I do normally take a look at other reviews of the films I watch, just to see if other people got something that I missed. Here, I think I must have been watching a completely different film. If you check out a lot of the online reviews of 'Citadel' then you'll be told it's one of the best modern horror films ever.

It just bored me.

It's an Irish horror film about a young man who witnesses his wife being murdered by demon children, leaving him an agoraphobic. He later meets up with a - slightly bonkers - old priest and they team up to fight the aforementioned demon hoodies.

It's an okay enough idea (I've seen worse), but I didn't find any of the characters interesting or likable, plus the children weren't that scary (well, no more than their identical clones you see hanging around every off license up and down the country).

Yes, it was presented in a reasonably different way which made it clear they were trying to steer away from the Hollywood style of film-making. But, at the end of the day, it didn't take away from the fact that it bored me.

Others obviously disagreed. Fair enough.
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you can forgive Tommy, you can watch the movie in its entirety.
Christine_Plymouth_Fury195828 November 2012
Honestly, I love the whole concept and the story. The thing I found so difficult to watch was the main character, Tommy Cowley. Granted he's agoraphobic, but I'm a bit irritated with such weak characters, especially when they're men. So you'd better have a lot of patience for Tommy's constant cringing if you want to finish the film.

In a nutshell, I thought the decisions the main character made were all short of idiotic, but then again, maybe it's attributed to his "condition". It didn't hamper the fact that the cinematography was quite good, the atmosphere--excellent, and the acting convincing. The spin of the story was also very interesting and I liked that they added an element of supernatural in it.

The pace of the movie is a bit slow, but I thought that worked quite well for the film. There's not much action involved, but I thought the ending was quite good. I still don't regret watching the film and would recommend it.
18 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Atrocious, boring, nonsensical rubbish
francishooks10 November 2012
Ever see the video for Come To Daddy by Aphex Twin?

If you haven't, do yourself a favour and check it out. It is 10 utterly brilliant and terrifying minutes. You won't regret it.

Why mention this?

Cos the director of this steaming pile of dung has clearly seen it and decided that what works in 10 minutes can be definitely dragged out for 85. Come To Daddy works cos it's a music video. It doesn't have to observe real life logic.

This just doesn't work. No-one calls the police in this. No-one even seems to own one these new-fangled telephone machines all the young people are talking about these days.

There are good reviews for this film on this site. Ignore them. They are (strangely enough!) 1-review wonders.

This film is dreck. Avoid.
43 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Bad, could have been better
trevbing5 December 2012
Not as bad as the previous user has stated, and seeing that he is Irish, you would think he would have a bit more encouragement for Irish funded films. Granted it is certainly not perfect, but the scary scenes are genuinely scary and the film does provide a jump here and there. The lead performance was strong enough for an upcoming actor and I liked the idea of a weak main character. The bargained price Brian Cox priest character was a bit too much though and the scenes involving him really took from the film. Overall very watchable and with more of a budget this could have been a whole other film....which is probably a bad thing
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Agoraphobia is a killer...
paul_haakonsen14 August 2013
Unfathomably dull and boring. "Citadel" is one of the more pointless and irrelevant movies that I have seen in a while. You just sit there throughout the movie and think "why?"

The story is about a family that live in a condemned building, where the Tommy (played by Aneurin Barnard) see his wife stabbed down by hooded strangers. Their unborn baby is miraculously saved, but the wife dies. Alone with the child, Tommy is given a strange warned by an odd priest (played by James Cosmo) that 'they will come for her'. Tommy's fear intensifies and grows more extreme as his home gets invaded by these hooded strangers and they seem to be haunting his every trail.

There were no thrills to this movie, and the storyline was just downright silly and a waste of time, in my opinion. I just didn't get the meaning of this movie.

The things that the movie has working for it is the production value, and also the performances put on by Aneurin Barnard and James Cosmo, particularly the latter actor. And also the pace in which the movie tells it story and progresses, it is quickly up in gear and the movie stays in high pace.

"Citadel" is an odd movie that doesn't appeal to a broad audience. I am sure there there is a segment in the audience that the movie will cater and they will find great enjoyment in the movie. I, however, wasn't fond or entertained by this movie in any way.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Makes Attack The Block Look Like a Hallmark Afternoon Special
witster1813 February 2013
I was teetering between 6 and 7 here, and settled on the latter because this IS a genuinely scary and disturbing film. We've definitely had a shortage of that lately in this genre - so it was nice to have some moments where, even at 39 years-old, I felt a little uneasy.

"Citadel" has many strengths and a few weaknesses. I'll touch on a bit of each while trying not to give too much away from what is a basic storyline. Now, it didn't have to be basic.

I think where the film misses is diving a bit further into the villains of this frightening tale. The back-story there is a bit vague to say the least, and the rest of the story doesn't do much to clear it up.

I'm sure that the budget constraints limited the production in certain ways, BUT I think all involved deserve more kudo's than criticism. After all, the intent with these types of films is to scare, and this is as "uncomfortable" as I've been watching a film in quite some time.

Think of a darker, scarier spin on Harry Brown. "Citadel" actually borrows quite a bit from "Harry Brown".

The film is extremely brooding - never really stepping into the light for more than a few seconds. I think it's definitely a strength. The film does have it's own sense of Style.

You have the feeling during this film that you are completely alone. There is no help coming, and you'll have to fend for yourself.

The film is without question under-rated at present on IMDb. I pulled up the rating on my phone after renting it from the redbox, and due to time, I nearly put-off watching it altogether. Glad I fit it in. I've seen 62 films from 2012 so far, and this is definitely in the top 20 for now. It's one of the better entries into the horror genre over the last few years, and could have been incredible if they would have just finished the film.

The ending needed a bit more carnage and revenge to put this over-the-top into the "true-gem-of-a-sleeper" category. They were so close... literally a few heads being axed-off and an explosion away from sheer low-budget glory, and a 9 ranking. Why do I get the feeling we'll see an American version of this that spends 10 times the money but has no sense of style or scare value?

The acting is way above average for this type of thing, and it's that acting and the mood that keeps it afloat. The lead and the priest are great. There are only 4 speaking roles in the whole film! 4! Rather than nit-pick the plot and the ending(which are easy targets) - let's step back and enjoy some of the strong characteristics of this film.

You might like this if you liked:Candyman(better), Winter's Bone(better),The Road(about even or ever-so-slightly better), Eden Lake(about even or ever-so slightly better), The People Under The Stairs(even), and The Brood(even).

If you want a sleeper horror film to rent - it's usually a dangerous proposition. That's one of the many reasons why I can recommend this one. Far from perfect, but boy this little low-budget Irish entry packs quite an uneasy punch.

67/100
16 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh how much better this could have been!
missismiggins16 November 2012
The idea was quite interesting and could have been made into a reasonable and creepy little movie. Sadly, that was not to be. The agoraphobic Tommy was painful to watch, like a scared rabbit caught in the headlights for the entire movie. You really wanted him to get a good kicking, he deserved it. The priest was not bad, a little OTT but likable, unklike Tommy, who became more loathsome as the movie progressed. The whingeing baby was also a bit of a spoiler too, there were quite a few times in the movie that I hoped the "Demon" children would have simply eaten her and been done.

Probably the most realistic and frightening part of the entire movie was the "Demon" children. These were obviously not actors, but real children from the West End of Newcastle, everything about them was authentic Scotswood/Benwell/Cruddas Park. Amazing how the film makers managed to train them to turn up for work each day. Their clothes and behaviour were a perfect example of the youth from the North East of England - fantastic casting! Well done to the make up department too! You managed to almost make them look a little more human than they appear in real life as they scurry through the alleys and back lanes of West Denton.
25 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie and a great performance by Aneurin Barnard
demetrius1115 November 2012
This movie obviously did not have the budget of the fancy multi-billion Hollywood production. Thus, in order to capture us, it focuses on one thing that Hollywood can not put a price on. Talent and acting. Aneurin Barnard is an excellent choice as the lead actor, and gives a wonderful and solid performance. He obviously is a very talented actor, and I am convinced that we will be seeing a lot more of him in the future. Hopefully not in crappy Hollywood high-budget flicks, but in films that focus on performance and talent. The entire cast was quite good in general, and combined with the direction, they created a "wonderful" claustrophobic atmosphere, that was exactly what this story needed. This movie will not impress due to its originality (as it is not very original really), but it is good due to the work put in it by talented individuals, and it is definitely worth seeing.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Why did anyone like this?
dawulf25 January 2013
I watched this last night. I just checked the reviews. I am frankly mind-boggled. Someone called it a social commentary...what? This movie is awful! Okay sure it shows the plight of the lower class. And some weird mutants that look like the paperboy from that John Cusack movie " Better Off Dead".

The lead character comes off as whiny, not sympathetic. I get that he is traumatized and has a phobia but come on..the acting is abysmal . On the other hand I did find the priest to be vaguely amusing though I don't think that was the intent.

I guess if you are a social sciences major or just pretentious you might find higher meaning in this. Me, I am just a high school graduate and found it to be stupid and that the lead character should have lost custody of the child.
19 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Original Irish Horror with a truly contemporary twist...
Zachar_Laskewicz25 May 2013
Although this film was made thanks to sponsorship from the Irish film board, it is far from a piece of Catholic dogma. The character who plays the priest renounces religion entirely and the film's horror is an original and recent addition to the genre. It's full of good ideas and can be related to relatively recent phenomena; the urban sprawl and the creation of enormous flatblocks outside city centres, prevalent across the United Kingdom. Most frighteningly perhaps it represents the disaffected youth who hide themselves from the enormous collection of security cameras which dictate their life. Spawns of drug selling youth hide their identity behind hoodies; who'd have guessed 20 years ago that being approached by a group of youth wearing tracksuits would be such a menacing phenomenon. In this film creative use is made of this fear. The film is far from perfect, but most important is its originality, fear is created the way it should be, as suspense, and the implication of the horror created by its themes don't require an enormous spilling of blood or disgusting special effects to disquiet and disturb you. I'm glad I saw this film; it proves again that truly good additions to the genre, don't originate from Hollywood and don't require its approval to be made.
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dont listen to dawolf, ever. This is decent w great acting
bradk-7563023 October 2020
Great acting by a guy that convinces u that hes going through some real stuff.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ireland Presents Its Entry For Horror Film 2012
gavin694226 April 2013
An agoraphobic father teams up with a renegade priest to save his daughter from the clutches of a gang of twisted feral children who committed an act of violence against his family years earlier.

Although I have to give my congrats to Ireland for making a widely-released horror film in 2012 (the Irish horror scene is not well-known in America)... and although this film seems to have resonated with various people... I just was not one of those people.

Honestly, I had a hard time getting into the picture and just sort of felt bored by it all. I am keeping this review at a 5 until I see it a second time (which may never happen). Maybe I just was not in the right mood, though I saw other films today without problems...
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not recommended to young parents...
Coventry6 July 2021
My thoughts and impressions regarding "Citadel" are split in two . On one hand, the screenplay is vastly implausible and full of holes to a point where it even becomes frustrating to watch. On the other hand, though, it's undeniably one of the only movies ever that truly gave me shivers and made me feel genuinely uncomfortable. And, in the end, isn't that what a good horror/thriller does? The shivers are caused by the miserable atmosphere, the bleak settings, the identifiable fear in the eyes of the lead character, and the simple fact that the life of an innocent and defenseless infant is at stake the entire running time. Especially that last element made a big impact on me. If I had seen "Citadel" immediately after its release, in 2012, or even a few years later, it probably would have been just another average horror film. In the meantime, however, I am a father of two myself, and must acknowledge that the worst nightmare imaginable is that you're incapable of protecting your child from whatever type of wrongdoing.

Writer/director Cirián Foy based the plot on a personal and traumatizing experience, as he was menaced by a group of hoodlum kids when he was younger, and the subsequent years in which he developed agoraphobia. He captures the intensity of this condition very accurately. I don't know if he's also a young parent, but he definitely also accurately captures the horrible sentiment of not being able to protect your own child. The ghettos where "Citadel" takes place, as well as the titular building and the supportive characters, are genuinely depressing and petrifying. Aneurin Barnard gives an authentically honest performance, and two or three sequences come so unexpectedly, and are so tense, that I can only refer to this film as a gem... Just not suitable for everybody.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Uneven hoodie horror
mdnobles1931 January 2013
Citadel is one of those movies that have a very effective, intriguing and startling beginning, but loses its steam after its tricks and twists are revealed. I did think the movie was atmospheric from beginning to end, with a couple of suspenseful moments here and there. The film starts off with young parents to be, who just finished packing up their things to move from their run down apartment building. The wife is soon attacked by unknown hooded youths, while the husband watches in horror as he gets stuck in an elevator. The attack leaves the wife dead, but forces the baby into the world prematurely. From there on we witness the father's struggle to raise his baby daughter on his own, while dealing with the loss of his wife and becomes agoraphobic. That raw, heartfelt, terrifying and emotionally powerful first half is boggled down by the unrealistic hooded figures that he fears the most, but for me I just wasn't sold and didn't find them scary. They reminded me of the creatures from The Brood.

The performances really save this film, most notably from Aneurin Barnard who plays the emotionally scarred, widowed father Tommy. He gives such an emotionally challenging role and does it in such a gripping fashion than most actors under 30 couldn't pull off. James Cosmo was also great as the Priest and gives such a dead pan, eccentric and commanding performance. James reminded me for some reason of the actor Brian Cox.

Director and writer, Ciaran Foy definitely knows how to get under your skin and stay there, with his claustrophobic atmosphere. I just thought there was an inconsistency with his story; sure it was gripping for most of the running time but just wasn't effective as a whole. The ending was just pretty weak to me and the hooded figures have been done before in a much scarier fashion, like in the film Them. The whole twist was just a sham to me and undermines the harrowing first half. He has the skills and knows how to use them for this genre but got quickly lost here. I still think that it's a pretty decent start for a first time director.

Overall, the movie that comes to mind that dealt with urban violence in a way more effective matter is The Brave One. Citadel had a great start and had one of the most heartfelt and gripping performances from an actor in a horror film in 2012. The villains were just not that scary and kind of silly to me once they are revealed and yanked the effectiveness out of the movie for me. It's a decent horror film but also a disappointment.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring...
tumtadiddlydoo23 September 2014
Browsing reddit for a horror movie to watch, I saw this one recommended a couple times. Something dealing with a more psychological aspect always interests me, so I decided to give it a shot. Sadly, I was disappointed. Small spoilers may follow (descriptions of small scenes) but nothing that will ruin the plot or the entirety of the described scene.

The movie doesn't really do a good job at... well, anything. Its plot is rather simple (not always bad) and several things were never entirely explained, such as the actual cause of what's going on as well as why some of the characters in the movie seem to just completely ignore the main character and his cries for help. There's a part (not to ruin anything) where he's shouting at someone that he just saw someone get killed and the guy he's shouting at doesn't even look him in the eye. At first I thought this was part of whatever was going on in this movie, until the "creatures" killed that guy only seconds later.

Additionally, several scenes in this movie seem implausible. While I'm aware horror's not supposed to be real, a couple scenes just defy logic, such as the creatures walking RIGHT past him at one point to attack some completely silent stranger further away from their point of entry. At times, it feels like the director forces illogical things to happen just to force conflict. Not to ruin anything again but there's a part where he has to break the door into his own house, leaving it vulnerable in the future. This is never explained, as it is made clear that it's his own house before this scene.

As for scares... Well I don't look for scares in horror movies. I look more for creepy. This movie, sadly, has neither. The creatures look like uninspired zombies (yet they're not zombies) and there's no scares, legitimate or jump-scare.

The movie's conclusion sort of just... ends. All in all, I want that hour and a half of my life back.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
They're Not Gonna See Us!!!!!!!!
wandernn1-81-68327426 June 2020
So dude's girlfriend gets assaulted and dies during childbirth, and dude ends up somehow with custody of the baby. We're starting on a bad note, because this kinda crap just doesn't happen. Where is the girls family? Where is his family? He's got sole custody with no help at all? Plus apparently he has severe Agoraphobia. I highly doubt this could ever possibly happen.

-1 Star right off the bat for 'I just don't believe it!'

-1 Star because theres no population to this city at all...theres apparently like 12 people in the whole city....

+1 Star I liked the little 'factory' they had set up inside the building.......

-1 Star I thought the end was stupid. This really was not a good movie.

3/10
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
That's an interesting movie
funnycommentor23 March 2023
First of all, the plot of the movie was very interesting and kinda innovative (I think so)... The storyline was well-written, it was simple and kinda easy to understand. The characters were very interesting, well-developed and really likeable. The filming location of the movie was just an abandoned creepy neighborhood. I have to admit, it was an unexpectedly scary movie and there were many jumpscares. The children's appearance was super creepy and kinda terrifying. The opening scene of the movie was definitely unexpected and it was kinda sad. The ending scene was kinda expected and it was super intense. Overall, it was just a nice psychological thriller movie that I would probably recommend it to my friends.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Like a day trip to Luton
valleyjohn15 June 2020
"They see your fear"

Is the tagline to Citadel and that may be true but the problem is , while watching this , i felt no fear and that's is downfall.

It's the story of an agoraphobic widower who reluctantly receives help from a rogue priest when the same hooded predators who slaughtered his wife , abduct his infant daughter.

I found this more depressing than scary . It's incredibly grey . A bit like a day trip to Luton .

The performances are fine . Aneurin Barnard does depressed , well and the blind kid played by Jake Wilson is impressive but not enough to make this film anything other than dull.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Broken Britain For Real!!! A Real Urban Horror.
lukem-5276016 February 2022
A very bleak look at "Broken Britain" & to be honest it's pretty accurate.

A very good performance from Aneurin Barnard (Elija Wood lookalike) as Tommy.

A young guy named Tommy is suffering from Agoraphobia after his wife was brutally attacked by a gang of vile feral kids (just like in real life everyday in England) & after stabbing her in her pregnant tummy she has the baby but eventually dies. This leaves Tommy on the edge of his nerves as he tries to protect his little baby, deal with the horrific death of his wife & survive in a depressing & depraved area. Citadel is set in a bleak place, it's winter, it's cold & there's no hope. The shooting locations are truly depressing to look at & very real places with all their gritty Urban charm lol. The acting is good off of the main guy playing Tommy & the big gloomy looking tower block is a creepy looking building for most of the final action to take place. The mood is scary, creepy & very dreary. Citadel is well filmed.

There's a mistake that annoyed me though, a car window gets smashed by a feral hoodie & next scene the window is fine!!! Annoying but a minor mistake in a decent slice of Urban horror.

I liked how they used the Hoodie culture as the vile savage creatures that roam the streets for victims because that is exactly what these street gangs do in real life here in England. I hate the depraved Chavs/Hoodies that destroy our country with their antisocial behaviour & i think they're merciless & soulless as the crimes they do are horrific & disturbing so this portrayal of them is perfect here as soulless feral monsters. At one point a Nurse moans to Tommy about how everyone sees these "kids" from broken homes & that we should feel sympathy for them Lol hahaha, reminded me of that Broken Britain time when our pathetic government said "Hug a Hoodie" lol absolutely ridiculous!!! These creatures are not normal kids, they are feral without any sort of moral understanding at all.....I'm talking about the real savage hoodies that roam the streets of England everyday. I've always thought of them as creatures as they are rough, extremely vile, extremely violent & do horrific things to innocent people & there for i think they deserve NO SYMPATHY, NO UNDERSTANDING & NO MERCY. The useless "government" just gave these violent degenerates "ASBO" which they used as a deranged badge of honor of some kind. The justice system doesn't work & these rough hoodies from rough estates just live for violence & anger & have no understanding of normality & that makes them extremely dangerous as shown in the excellent EDEN LAKE. People say oh these poor kids are from broken homes & their poor & their unloved but none of that can ever excuse their vile & horrific actions. We all have problems but we don't put a stupid hood over our heads, grab a knife & go causing evil shi#. Truth is Vigilante justice is the only way to deal with that Yob culture or hoodie culture as seen in HARRY BROWN or OUTLAW.

Citadel shows real horror of real life poverty-stricken areas & turns it into a very scary psychological Horror-Thriller piece with a strong atmosphere that fills you with dread.

I also believe blowing up a building with gangs of violent feral hoodies inside is a great idea by Citadel's angry priest.

Anyway Citadel hits it's note with it's social commentary, the mouthy priest character was fairly interesting but the little blind boy seemed pointless. Towards the end of it turns slightly into fantasy but still rooted deep in British Urban Horror & Mythology. Director Ciaran Foy (Sinister 2) really crafted a scary slice of Hoodie Horror that feels full of hopelessness, fear & survival. Young Tommy will have to face his fears if he wants his daughter & himself to survive in this place. Citadel is an atmosphere piece & it totally succeeded. I felt echoes of the 1992 Classic Candyman which is also drenched in Urban Horror & Mythology. Citadel sits alongside the Hoodie Horror genre that came out of the mid-2000's when Hoodies basically took over England. We had a new genre & many Horror-Thriller films came out of societies fears of those savage feral gangs such. Films: Outlaw, Attack the Block, Community, Comedown, Harry Brown, F, Cherry Tree Lane, Tower Block, Citadel, Shank, Kidulthood, Eden Lake & Heartless, to name a few!!!

A Decent urban decay setting & a feel of real life Misery that grabs you by the throat & a an uneasiness that hangs over the whole movie, makes this one of the best & scariest of the Urban Horror genre.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I made an account just to rate this movie because it's that bad! I'd give this zero stars if I could!
teekieteekybirdie15 March 2019
DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME WATCHING THIS FILM! It's horribly boring, not scary at all, I don't understand why people are giving it such a high rating saying it was good, it was utter garbage! A total waste of 2 hours of my life I'll never get back! This has got to be one of the most boring lamest films I've ever seen. Don't trust the good reviews, pass on this one and watch something else.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A way above average
dimitrijed20 January 2020
I have a friend who's got a mild degree of agoraphobia and this movie, apart from being a decent horror flick, reminds me of him and kinda raises the question of people with that kind of disability.

The portrayal of a guy who goes over his fears & conditions to save his child from the hands of a pack of violent children is harsh and powerful and the director, IMHO, made it quite possible to identify with the main actor. The plot is smart, not easily predictable and the effects are okayish, given the budget.

A hidden gem worth watching.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Urban horror about demonic youth – or is it!?
UnluckyLuke19 March 2013
Tommy (Aneurin Barnard) is plagued by misfortune. His girlfriend is attacked and killed by gangster children in the common apartment. The case is dropped because of lack of evidence. Now he is alone with the raising of Elsa, the common baby, and forced to be brave, Tommy doesn't manage. Alone and isolated, he now lives in a shabby suburban flat and develops a fear that prevents him from leaving the house. But the demons of the past find him even there, breaking in and ravage the apartment. The kids, who killed his girlfriend, like Tommy says. And this time they're after Baby Elsa. Now time has come to fight the demons...

CITADEL, the debut of Irish director Ciaran Foy, reminds in many ways of the French Comet-Horror DEAD SHADOWS, but especially of the English movie HEARTLESS, mainly because of his Hoodie Monster. As a viewer you will be long kept in the dark about what these hoodie kids, who also remind of the Satankids from the "Come to Daddy"-Music Video by Aphex Twin, really are. Whether demons, zombies, possessed ones or simply but only dis-social behaving, aggression and violence as a way of life practicing youth from the lowest social class. Hard to say. The film will define that a little clearer, but it raises the question whether you take the showings at their word, or perhaps should lenses behind the facade of his imagery. Much of CITADEL's plot is metaphorical and worth of interpretation, as if one should not accept what is offered visually. Take the main character Tommy: a sissy, a crybaby, a weakling of superlatives. He has the word "sacrifice" literally written on his forehead. The few people, with whom Tommy maintains contact, doubt his version of the zombie children and that they have targeted Elsa. Much more logical it would be Tommy as an outsider and Wunderling stamped with mental h problems. Only a boorish priest - played by James Cosmo (Braveheart, Trainspotting) - Tommy helps to fight the personified evil. They both go to the crime scene from the past, a ruin-like high-rise complex, and deliver a showdown with the demonized kiddies.

CITADEL is not easy to watch, which actually may be an advantage, because it brings the brain to work. Offered are typical horror movie elements like shockers and an all-encompassing darkness, which destroys any lust for life. Taking Citadel and its plot literally, it is not the most satisfying horror movie. Recognizing its intuition and its therapeutic value, you'll find a very interesting piece of independent cinema.

Resume: Super dark urban horror of emotional cripples, personalized fears and demon kids. From the psychological point very interesting.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Citadel
Prismark1016 August 2020
Citadel aimed to be a low budget psychological horror and falls flat. Attack the Block released a year earlier did this much better with an alien invasion.

Tommy (Aneurin Barnard) is single father with a new born baby daughter living in fear in a tower block from some feral beings. They attacked his pregnant wife which Tommy witnessed, the baby was saved but his wife eventually dies.

A potty mouthed priest (James Cosmo) tells Tommy that these feral beings smell the fear in him and they will soon come for his baby daughter. The priest wants to blow up the tower block.

Director Ciaran Foy makes his own commentary on Broken Britain which has a reactionary streak. Blow them all up as Tommy goes for a Death Wish option and channels his inner Charles Bronson.

The film would had worked better if the viewer felt that this might be all in Tommy's head. If we never see the faces of these feral beings so we are not sure if they are kids or creatures.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
'Ils' is better
znegative28 June 2016
I had heard a lot about Citadel, so perhaps I went into this movie expecting too much. I also think that if I hadn't already seen 'Ils' ('Them') that I would have thought this flic was a lot better.

The one thing that I liked about both Citadel and Ils is that both are intelligent horror films which are metaphors for something deeper than what is on the surface. Ils deals with Xenophobia (or rather, it could be argued is a piece of Xenophobic propaganda lol), and Citadel, which has a similar plot, is a metaphor about the fear of becoming a parent.

On an intellectual level I thought that Citadel had a lot going for it. Unfortuntately, it just reminded me too much of Ils in the stylistic department, and even worse, it just couldn't measure up.

Don't get me wrong, this one is light years ahead of most horror movies, but there are also a lot better ones out there.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A slow burn horror thriller that seems to be missing something
trublu21531 January 2015
Citadel centers on Tommy, a recently widowed father and his newborn daughter as he begins to cope with the loss of his wife after a brutal attack by local hoodlums. In trying to cope with the loss, Tommy begins to develop a fear of living life and soon he begins to be stalked by her attackers. Citadel is an impressive debut and serves an original idea up but relies heavily on a slow burn screenplay that doesn't always serve it justice. Despite some ultra elongated scenes, Citadel is creepy, violent and very atmospheric. Directed by Ciarian Foy, the film works as a psychological thriller done much in the vein of Them and The Strangers and ends up being a bit of a combo of both. Foy, who also wrote the film, knows how to deliver some hard hitting drama and gets very good performances out of Aneurin Barnard and James Cosmo but he spends entirely too much time creating a slow burn thriller that it tends to drift into some truly low key moments that just are not all that interesting. The first ten minutes are very straight forward and are delivered very well, then Foy decides to spend the next twenty five minutes analyzing agoraphobia. It is interesting for the first couple scenes but Foy seems to keep it frustratingly slow up until the third act. Still, nonetheless, when Citadel kicks off it, it really kicks. The final twenty minutes are very well crafted and, while a bit ridiculous, serves as a very satisfying end to the film. On a technical level, Citadel is on point. Most notably from behind the scenes would be the cinematography. The entire film is done hand held, and really submerses you into this frightening vision of Ireland. It is most certainly the highlight of the film. Overall, Citadel may satisfy some fans of films like House of the Devil, Them, and The Strangers but it doesn't have the spark it needs to be truly engrossing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed