Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsCannes Film FestivalStar WarsAsian Pacific American Heritage MonthSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
Retour
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Pig (2010)

Avis des utilisateurs

Pig

27 commentaires
4/10

Well, it was what it claimed to be...almost

I'm not going to go into elaborate detail about the quality or goings-on of the story, because Adam Mason's press release warned/boasted that the film contained no plot...only brutality, gore & degradation. And it certainly lived up to that. As far as as a review is concerned, I agree completely with pretty much everything Shawn Savage said in his review.

I was pretty bored throughout the proceedings, especially after I noticed the first edit in the supposedly uninterrupted, single-take film. It occurred approx 20 min. into the film...the camera moves in on the truck-bed girl's dress, there's a dissolve (read: cut), and the camera pulls back to continue capturing the goings-on. Not that what Adam Mason & co. pulled off in long takes wasn't sometimes impressive, but if you're going to boast a 70+ minute, uninterrupted take, don't cheat. My opinion is if they decided to allow themselves "hidden" cuts (a la Hitchock's ROPE), they might as well have put some effort into some semblance of a storyline to make the whole thing a bit less monotonous.

I probably would have only given this 2 stars, but the film's score was really quite engaging and well-done throughout, and that's primarily what kept me watching.
  • tstrauss
  • 17 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
4/10

Umm.....yeah....

So...usually, before I get into what I liked and didn't like about a movie when I review it, I usually give a plot summary to show others what it's about. But, in this case, I cant give one because, frankly, there IS no plot

Now, I have good news and bad news about this film. The good news is that this film goes above and beyond the normal setting for films going "too far". The bad news? There's not much else to this film.

A thing that I have to praise this film for is it's one on-going shot that's used for almost the entire film. If you want to become a director, cinematographer, or pretty much anything else to do with film, you should see this film purely on that.

But, the major down-side to this film is that it's just plain boring at times. I'm not one of these conservative people who will hate this film because "It's too terrible" or "It will corrupt the kids" or anything like that. I mainly don't like it that much because it's just plain boring at times. Your waiting for the film to move on at points, but it never really does.

Maybe that was the director's intentions or the actors intentions (because you can tell that this film is mainly improv), but whatever it is, it's not something that you should really see OTHER than the technical stand-point.
  • anguspage12
  • 28 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
4/10

Pig.

A psychopath's idea of fun is to torture and kill people on a ranch in the middle of nowhere. Seemingly filmed in one take, Pig is pretty much just torture, killing and degradation, with a slight twist at the end. Grim, mean spirited stuff. But effective. .
  • xuenylomluap
  • 4 déc. 2021
  • Permalien
1/10

God help me, I tried...

I really, really did try to like this movie. I really wanted to enjoy this as sheer brutality, something that simply tried to be as vulgar as rating systems would allow. There's just. No. Plot. It's just a bad movie, plain and simple. Sure, it's got all the earmarks of a pretty, technically well-made film, but if you don't have that kind of film school background, it's nothing but torture porn, and within the first 5 minutes, you realize that it's not even torture porn: just sexist, reprehensible and filth. I'm fine with a good bit of Saw or Devil's Rejects fun, but when you're just beating the sh*t out of women for a good hour and a half, it's not fun anymore.

What a damn shame.
  • orokausagi
  • 24 juil. 2010
  • Permalien

Pointless demoralizing hiding behind being art (failling at that)

My quick rating - 2,4/10. All this is? 69 minutes of watching some supposed psychotic serial killer demoralize some captors in the middle of nowhere. Scenery is great if you want to stare at a mobile home for that long. So terrible acting, pissing on a woman for no reason, cooking with blood, a pregnant captor acting like a two year old....that about sums up this movie. Oh, that other one minute? (yes, the "movie" is only 70 minutes which is hardly categorized as a movie) That other one minute is the only reason this gets a single point since I never saw the ending coming. Beyond that, horrible in every way. They skipped the killing to make it about a serial killer. The one person killed just, died from headbutts. Oops (yeah, he actually says "I didn't mean to kill her") I'd mention poor script, but I doubt there was one.
  • jackmeat
  • 14 oct. 2015
  • Permalien
1/10

Isn't this plagiarism?

This has more or less the exact same "plot" and has the exact same title as PIG (from 1998) made by Rozz Williams (former singer of Christian Death) and Nico B. ...Sooo...wouldn't this count as plagiarism?? Yeah I can understand this movie having the same title as you can't really copyright a one word title, but for having more or less the same plot ASWELL as having the same title....?? Surely that seems a bit "too much of a coincidence"...No? Did the creator of this movie really hope that no one would take notice?? Well too bad for them because I sure DID take noticed! Horrible! Get your OWN ideas instead of stealing others!
  • mumzzen
  • 31 mars 2022
  • Permalien
1/10

If you are squeamish bring a barf bag

I hated it with a passion! I mean it tried to be Wolf Creek, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Devil's Rejects and Funny Games which it did kind of surpassed them when it came to disgusting, stomach turning violence and gore but did it ever cross their minds that less is sometimes more when it comes to horror movies. There is no suspense and is an insult to the senses and it crossed the line and it amazes me that some people think this is good and watchable and it makes me want to take a long shower afterwards, maybe that was their goal. I have to give it to Andrew Howard for giving an insane, ballsy, what the heck performance, Rob Zombie would be proud but how could you walk away sane after making this I mean it's like an experiemental film gone horribly wrong. I hate it even more for making no sense out of the crimes and no backstory for any of the characters, it didn't make me care just disgusted and very, very annoyed but the ending was crazy to see what he was and the life he was going back to. Overall sure it had guts plenty of it but no substance and nothing to back it up and it's completely unnecessary and I urge everyone to avoid it!
  • mdnobles19
  • 16 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
1/10

Boring best describes this "movie."

You might like this movie if you like your violence off screen.
  • johninvirginia2005
  • 1 août 2019
  • Permalien
1/10

Boring movie

This movie is the definition of a boring movie. Everything happens super slowly. The main actor is looking for something in a boringly slow way, and on it's way, he does some nonsense things that are meant to mean "the modern world is bad and I am good". Terrible movie.
  • nofacenoname-20384
  • 3 déc. 2021
  • Permalien
6/10

More of an experiment in the technical side of film making.

Adam Mason's "Pig" premiered free to all tonight, on bloody-disgusting, dreadcentral, and Twitchfilm. Mason was responsible for the mind-f*ck of a film "The Devil's Chair." as well as "Blood River." To call this a film would be liberal usage of the word. It's more of an experiment in the technical side of film making. There is no narrative, no character development, and honestly no purpose to the film. The bulk of the movie(70 minutes) was filmed in one take. If you explain this to the average movie goer, not only will they not care, but they most likely won't even know what you're talking about.

Now that I've explained that this isn't really a movie, but more of a talent showcase, let's delve into what worked for me. Knowing I was viewing one continuous take blew my mind for most of the film. The cinematography is nothing short of amazing after consuming that fact. Even more impressive is how they allow for F/X gags to be set up while the camera is running. A quick re-frame of the shot, allows for the off-screen crew to quickly set up the special effects. Some of the tricks used here were absolutely brilliant. Setting the kill in the bed of a pick-up truck, allows for them to make a quick cut to a wide-shot, while someone crawls on their belly, setting up the effects for the kill.

This isn't a movie to be enjoyed. In fact, I wouldn't recommend viewing this film to anyone unless they are not only an aspiring film maker, but interested in film making as an art form. It's hard to watch, and not because of the subject matter. While our main character prepares his "meal" the camera lingers on him, with his captive struggling in the background. This goes on for what seems like forever. A lot of the time, it made me feel like I was stoned. I knew something should be going on on the screen, but I felt so disoriented that I couldn't tell if I was missing something, or if that was just the way the movie made me feel. The acting is decent, considering there's not much coherent dialog, and that this is mostly happening in real time. The setting is believable, all-be-it a little bland. The music gets a tad annoying, with the same song being played in the back ground over and over.

If you're interested in becoming a film maker, and marvel at the technical aspects of a film, you may want to endure this experiment. You'll definitely be in for something original. But please, don't go into the flick expecting an enjoyable movie, because aside from marveling at the talent behind the camera, there's nothing to like here. Watch if you dare, and remember you've been warned.

http://liberaldead.blogspot.com
  • Strawberry_Typhoon
  • 17 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
2/10

What Did I Just Watch.

How am I supposed to rate this thing? I am going to say this is not a movie, this is mental insanity, a test, and I have survived. When I saw this film for the first time clips from it, I believed this was at least going to be decent, but no. Oh god No. There's no way in hell that this thing is decent, no.

The only positive I can give this thing is sometimes a tiny bit interesting but tame gore effects, everything else is a zero. There's no plot, even if there's no plot there are films like The Butcher and Guinea Pig that even without a plot, make you kinda care for our victims, here you really can't do that. The wife character is probably the most annoying, and to listen to her for an hour, will make you pissed, and just wish to break something.

The film is simple as it is, an insane couple, torturing three young people. While that may sound interesting to some no. Here it was made in a way that you cant care for anyone, and pray to God that the thing ends. Just imagine if August Underground was at a farm, and the whole movie is only at the farm.

Good Lord this was terrible, there was nothing to like here. And it's just the worst version of August Underground. I haven't been disturbed or upset in this movie at all, Halloween original was more disturbing than this thing was, simply because you had a plot and characters to care about, here it's brought to a negative zero.

The ONLY reason why this thing has a 2 and not a 1 from me, is because I had to suffer myself to watch Begotten and Gummo, which are the two worst films I have ever had to watch. I said if I had Begotten disk, I would of broken, and burned it with love.

Also, nothing is explained here. Did you get this insane bald guy, just hunting down young people and torturing them with his wife, why? Nothing is explained and nothing goes nowhere. If you for whatever reason want to watch this, just know that you will be hoping for the film to end, and wish you have not lost your 1 hour and 30 minutes on this thing.
  • DarkSpotOn
  • 28 juin 2022
  • Permalien
8/10

Visceral, brutal, and brilliant

  • Denatir
  • 29 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
7/10

Grimy hicksploitation lunacy

A hypnotic headmashing experiment in single camera nastiness, PIG certainly lived up to and also confounded my expectations. I was expecting a standard redneck slasher film, which in essence it is, but the totally unhinged performances and the atmosphere of inescapable dread really hooked me in, and made me feel I needed a shower after it was over. Extremely technically impressive, almost completely improvised, and bringing to mind other experimental fare like the August Underground series, PIG is practically a video diary of murder, degradation, and crack-smoking madness. As unsettlingly brilliant as Andrew Howard's performance is, a few moments of pitch-black humour dot the proceedings, adding an interesting edge to an otherwise fairly archetypal character. The music can get slightly tiresome, I'd have liked to see it with no score at all except the radio excerpts. It's certainly a slog, but an admirable and affecting one.
  • jeffers_13
  • 18 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
3/10

A massive disappointment

As you will read in many other reviews here, the fact that the film is filmed in one continuous shot is very impressive, and Adam Mason should be applauded for this fact alone. The fact that he was able to get the film to run smoothly and all the special effects still worked is a marvel. However, that's where my appreciation ends. You see, Pig is an incredibly dull and boring film. It was marketed as being this incredibly disturbing and filthy movie with sadistic violence and deplorable scenes throughout. What we get is a whole lot of sub par acting, particularly that of the female antagonist in the movie. The film's portrayal of her being mentally disabled is extremely over the top, annoying, and frankly an offensive portrayal. The hur-dur dialogue and sounds that come out of her mouth are absolutely insufferable. The male antagonist is better, but it's like comparing excrement to expired food. One is clearly better but both are pretty awful. His performance is over the top, and not in a fun way. More of an embarrassingly amateurish way. The film is also an absolute bore, with there not being much of a plot at all outside of the 2 antagonists torturing a few people mentally in physically. Don't get me wrong either, I am a fan of movies such as the Guinea Pig franchise and other extreme cinema but here it is just dull. Nothing you see on screen isn't something you haven't seen before in countless other extreme horror films, or even many mainstream horror films. By nature, the fact that the film is shot in one take means that there are going to be some scenes where the actors do things that allow the special effects or set pieces to be set up while they talk or do something in the forefront. However, as I said before the acting is atrocious so really the only draw for the movie is the torturous acts commuted. And those aren't interesting either. So what we're left with is a movie that was shot in a cool way, but what is happening on screen is mediocre at best and unbearably annoying at its worst. A real shame.
  • davidgreen9817
  • 15 mars 2022
  • Permalien
7/10

An extremely nasty yet impressive endurance test

PIG is not a movie you're likely to put on for the family after a big Christmas lunch, but as an exercise in unrelenting brutality it's certainly worth checking out for any fan of extreme cinema.

Even at only a little longer than an hour PIG seems a bit too padded. If this was a 60-minute MASTERS OF HORROR episode it would have easily been the best one, but a certain numbness sets in to the viewer around 45-minutes in after such a protracted exhibition of frenzy, brutality and madness.

Technically the film's much-ballyhooed 'single take' technique is certainly daring. And the performances are committed, if not always entirely successful in some instances.

All-in-all this isn't a perfect film. But Adam Mason and his team have gone and done a left-of-field experiment in grueling extremity. And for a vast majority of its run time it most certainly succeeds.
  • CashBailey
  • 17 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
9/10

Old school Video Nasty fun!

Let's get things straight right away, PIG is a deeply unpleasant and offensive film – not just in a grotesque visual manner but as an endurance test of cinematic tolerance for the viewer. In its simplest terms PIG is a 90 minute snapshot into the life of a brutally deviant trailer trash serial killer – little to no dialogue, the most minimal of plot structure but for the mature horror film fan a deeply gratifying film experience.

In the lead role Andrew Howard manages to maintain a believable level of depraved intensity with even the odd moment that looks like his own psyche is being deranged by the role he's portraying whilst his shadow 'retard' sister adds to the visual and aural assault on viewers.

Don't be under any illusion, PIG is a challenging film experience and most definitely not one for a mainstream multiplex film fan - well the film (welcomingly) has no moral value whatsoever and is pure 1980's vintage video nasty fare, reminiscent of the final 'family dinner' reel of Texas Chainsaw Massacre but with PIG kicking in from the opening scene and rolling with that intensity throughout the entire film (which in itself might be testing for even some horror fans but for this old genre buff was a welcome challenge to behold).

Filmmaker Adam Mason has proved yet again that he's one of the finest talents from the Britsploitation scene, with PIG he's produced a film that's part old school classic exploitation cinema (James Ferman era BBFC would have positively imploded on viewing this one, be under no doubts this would have been banned outright back in the day) and part challenging modern improv horror theatre.

Destined to become a horror film festival favourite – excellent.
  • alan-1276
  • 21 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
7/10

Hard going at times, but ultimately worth the effort.

  • BA_Harrison
  • 25 mai 2011
  • Permalien
7/10

Loved it.

I knew what I was getting myself into before I started to watch this movie and so should anyone else, so I'm not going to even mention the violent content. It's a movie about a crazed killer, what do you think is going to happen!? In fact, I think Texas Chainsaw Massacre has a lot more graphic gore than Pig does. Perhaps what a lot of people have a problem with is that the main character is almost likable. Sure he's a sick twisted maniac, but thanks to Andrew Howard's fine acting he gradually becomes a 3 dimensional character that you begin to see is much more than just a brainless psycho. Every now and then there are glimpses of an almost regular guy here. A regular guy that just happens to be a blood thirsty animal. I should also say that ALL the acting is first class considering the subject matter and the fact that there's not much actual dialogue.

The single shot technique works extremely well. It gives us a sense of time and a good layout of his home and surroundings. This in itself is very impressive and should be applauded. The music is sometimes annoying and unnecessary, but it's not a major flaw. I also love the talk radio in the background, almost like a commentary on what we are witnessing.

All in all, a fantastic effort. Adam Mason is a director to be taken seriously. He is pushing the boundaries without relying on excess gore and expensive effects. He obviously has an excellent sense of nail biting tension without forgetting to deliver us interesting characters that force us to react to them.

I'll finish off by saying, the ending of Pig is genius!!

Adam Mason, I salute you.
  • Black1969
  • 8 août 2010
  • Permalien
8/10

"I never put a screwdriver up someone's ass before.."

I watched the film for free on FearNet, and I must say I had a good time watching it. The cinematography was great, especially considering that it was mostly done in one take. Just imagining how difficult it would be to set up the FX (no CGI here) while still rolling still boggles me.

I admit the acting and dialogue wasn't the greatest, but really, how many horror movies can you think of that excel in these categories? True horror fans have adapted to overlook these things and see films as the whole. We can laugh when the dialogue doesn't make sense.

I loved the Public Radio background and am wondering if this is an actual radio program or made up for the film (probably the latter).. I mean, it sounded authentic enough.

I can definitely tell this film was fun to work on; wish I could have been there. If you're like me and aspire to see a wide variety of horror films and not just the crap that makes it to theaters, give this one a look.
  • m_e_m_n_o_c_h
  • 28 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
7/10

Unpleasant but worth a look

Worth a look for fans of extreme cinema, Pig is undoubtedly an unpleasant experience and as such isn't for everyone. Much less a narrative film than a technical experiment, as there isn't any story to speak of, think of it as a gory experimental film and you're not too far off the mark. Boasts a great, demented performance by the lead actor and contains some genuinely disturbing moments that are unfortunately offset by long stretches where not much is happening but crazy shenanigans that don't amount to much and a fairly annoying, overused score. Still, Adam Mason is definitely a talented director and unlike so many other horror movies, Pig isn't cookie-cutter formula film-making and deserves to be seen... But again, not by everyone.
  • martymartini
  • 18 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
6/10

Insane

  • TheKillingJoke1991
  • 17 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
8/10

Insane...absolutely insane!

Pig is very hard to sum up in a paragraph, that is certain. I have to admit that I went into this knowing nothing of what to expect. I was very pleased (not sure "pleased" is the best word) with what I saw. This was simply a disgusting bunch of fun rolled into a little over 90 minutes. I don't know for sure if I actually blinked while viewing this or not in fear that I would miss something. If you are looking for a fun time definitely take a stab at PIG. You will not be disappointed. For those of you that are squeamish..tread the other direction, because this movie is as sick as it gets. Glad to see someone making a movie that really pushes the boundaries to the extreme. Granted this film is not for everyone as many will say its boring, no plot or senseless but I feel that is what was intended. Any B Movie liver will want to watch this many times. Great time!!!
  • kalebson1234
  • 19 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
10/10

Adam Mason's Pig is an experiment in terror and psychosis

  • DMentDCinema
  • 12 mars 2011
  • Permalien
10/10

Great.

  • soulwheat
  • 19 avr. 2010
  • Permalien
9/10

Something not so different, done completely different

I come across indie movies all the time, so many are flat with no enthusiasm, very rarely is there a diamond in the rough, Enter PIG. With a nice experimental feel, PIG plays out interestingly enough. Never knowing what is going to happen next, PIG delivers with surprise, and sometimes, down right shock. Regardless of how unoriginal the story may be at times, it's the ending that got me. Nothing better than a message hidden within the madness. Such a message on society did nothing less than sucker punch me.

If you have a chance to see PIG (along with the stomach, and patience) do so!
  • dmkinkain
  • 17 avr. 2010
  • Permalien

En savoir plus sur ce titre

Découvrir

Récemment consultés

Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
Télécharger l'application IMDb
Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
Télécharger l'application IMDb
Pour Android et iOS
Télécharger l'application IMDb
  • Aide
  • Index du site
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Salle de presse
  • Publicité
  • Tâches
  • Conditions d'utilisation
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.