Honest Man: The Life of R. Budd Dwyer (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
I was one of the snow day kids
TristramShandy13 July 2019
I was a sophomore in high school when Dwyer committed suicide, and as the documentary mentions, that was a snow day in Central Pennsylvania. One of the Harrisburg television stations showed the whole suicide, not stopping with the gun in the mouth. Dwyer's death was a haunting moment for many who grew up in Pennsylvania around my age.

Agree with some of the other reviews, both good and bad. The documentary is way too complimentary of Dwyer - - it comes off as something that was financed by his family and friends. As such, the first two-thirds isn't as compelling as a more evenhanded discussion of the man would have been. However, once the day of his suicide is the focus, the documentary picks up, especially with discussion of how the media reacted to the incident. My experience of seeing the suicide happen has made me naturally interested in all things Dwyer; I'm not sure this documentary would make someone who doesn't have the natural interest in the story interested in it.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Troubling...
BandSAboutMovies11 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I was 15 years old when R. Budd Dwyer killed himself on live TV. Many stations refused to show the full footage, like KDKA, WPXI in Pittsburgh broadcast the footage uncensored on an early newscast, as they believed that kids wouldn't be home to see it. That said - there was a snowstorm so many of us were home early. Many kids reacted just like they did to the Challenger crash, with dark humor being the only way to deal with it. I've since learned that a study of the incidence of the jokes showed that they were told only in areas where stations showed the uncensored footage.

Honest Man: The Life of R. Budd Dwyer attempts to tell the story behind the man who killed himself with a .357 Magnum after being implicated in a scandal with Computer Technology Associates (CTA)

The Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dwyer had run as a common man from a small town and throughout this documentary, this fact - and the feeling that he let down his hometown and the people that believed in him - is drummed home.

Everyone has a side to their story in this, including the last interview filmed with his wife before she died and his children. There's also some incredible scenes William T. Smith, the person whose testimony convicted Dwyer. I wonder how much of the Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul character of James Morgan "Jimmy" McGill/Saul Goodman is based on this guy. He really seems to be a real-life Bob Odenkirk character.

This is a balanced documentary that really lets you come to your own conclusion. Sadly, I feel like politics have only gotten worse since Dwyer's death.

The film also impacted me because Dwyer was often at the center of tape trading in the days before the internet. I'm a big fan of sites like the Found Footage Festival, who recently discussed with David Cross how he started trading tapes. My history of video mix tapes is similar - there was always someone who had a VHS tape at a party that had something you had only heard of. There were things like Pastor Gas, where televangelist Robert Tilton was overdubbed with fart noises. There was always Faces of Death. And there was always grainy footage of R. Budd Dwyer ending his life on live television.

We became desensitized to it. As each progressive generational dub was made, the footage became as hard to see as our morals. There was always a race to find the next crazy thing, to see something we shouldn't see. At that time, there was just a strange subculture that wanted to own these moments. I'm not saying that everyone wanted to see extreme things. But the majority of mixtapes were often chock full of things like this.

Watching this film, I remembered seeing Dwyer more times than I'd like to think. And the suicide has reverberated throughout pop culture, inspiring songs like Marilyn Manson's "Get Your Gunn" (complete with a sample of Dwyer's voice), Kreator's "Karmic Wheel" and Filter's "Hey Man, Nice Shot."

This film made me think about my ethics and about tape trading before the internet blew finding a clip wife open. And most importantly, it made reconsider a man that I've always thought was guilty and took the coward's way out because his back was to the wall. Trust me - it's not as simple as that.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very poignant story especially the last half hour
brian-wernham-396-8656227 January 2019
A very poignant story especially the last half hour. His wife son daughter and friends have obviously been involved in the making of this documentary...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A terribly one-sided "documentary".
ShoeBuckle5 February 2012
I just finished the film and was taken by how one sided it turned out to be. At least half of the film covers his past. It plays out more like a tribute to the main character - Budd Dwyer.

The film is composed entirely of interviews and news casts. Headlines and partially highlighted newspaper articles are repeatedly shown. The selection of people interviewed and the amount of air time they are given all create bias towards Dwyer.

One example is the the appointment of a federal prosecutor. The film has someone interviewed stating that the "Democratic governor" had a role in his appointment. That is far from being true as it was a federal crime. The president at the time was Ronald Reagan who was also head of the Republican party. The Attorney General of the US is appointed by the president and he in turn assigns federal prosecutors. The "documentary" tries to make it seem that the Democratic governor who felt wronged by Dwyer was out for vengeance.

Another example of biasness is when the film shows the man who gave Dwyer the bribe money. William Smith, the district Republican chief, states in one scene of the film he was surprised that Dwyer accepted the money when he offered it to him. This would seem to indicate he knew it was bribe money. The film then tries to show he lied at Dwyer's trial because he was offered a plea bargain. One scene lasts three seconds and the other 4 minutes. Be very careful while watching as you may miss items as they are being glossed over by the filmmakers. Afterwards think about all you have seen and make your own decision regarding the case.

The interviews with Dwyer's son unwittingly show how he failed as a father. His son is not a very nice or compassionate man. The film spends far too much time interviewing Bud Dwyer's friends and family. It does not spend enough time combing through the case which led to his conviction.

The "documentary" did not do a very good job when explaining the charges against Dwyer. Instead it quickly introduced the evidence and witnesses then spent more time trying to demean them. It's as if the filmmakers felt only the headlines and a few quips were sufficient. I took issue with this and realized how poorly done the film had become.

I enjoy watching documentaries and exploring issues in an unbiased manner. This film really was a let down. I would say it is more of a propaganda piece than anything else. If you always felt Bud Dwyer was innocent or were one of his supporters then this film may be enjoyable. No one can feel good about what Dwyer did in taking his own life but do not let that act cloud your own judgment when viewing the film. I can not recommend others view it.
23 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Emotional, enlightening, and revealing biography
ricardojvillarreal1 January 2011
I had the great opportunity to come across "Honest Man: the Life of R. Budd Dwyer", a very well done biographical documentary and a tribute to a man who dedicated his life to serve his state, but who fell victim of political revenge and a disastrous justice system.

Although it's very hard to think about Budd Dwyer without thinking of his suicide, this documentary does an incredible job of not exploiting "the scene", guiding the audience to focus on what's really important to understand, which is Budd's life and his story.

The composition of the film was brilliant, narrating the story through a combination of powerful interviews with family members, notable archive materials, historic documents, and a very fine touch of artistic elements.

This is a great film that is both emotional and informative, and one not to miss.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Does what it set out to do: sheds light on the man, not just the spectacle
Mr-Fusion1 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Were it not for the infamous news footage of R. Budd Dwyer's public suicide, this man would certainly never have crossed my radar. That footage is all over the internet, and its enduring popularity is due mostly to shock at what our media will dare to show (a man blowing his brains out was actually televised in 1987). But it gives no indication or insight into the man at the center of the controversy. So from that standpoint, "Honest Man" is a welcome examination of the man, himself.

And it is a surprisingly touching, discreet and (most importantly) informative documentary. To hear the interviewees tell it, Dwyer was a real man of the people, religiously devoted to his family and honest to a fault (perhaps naively). He really seems like a good guy, politician or not, and maintained his own brand of likability. I guess you could call this one-sided, or just a tribute ... but in the end, it's still far more than this country ever did know about him.

But discretion only lasts so long here, and I was pretty disappointed that the movie included the incident. They did such a good job of portending what was coming, that they could've cut as soon as he raised the gun. The implication was all that was needed. But they decided to let us see the gunshot, and linger on his slumped (and bloodied) corpse. It's not graphic footage, so much as surprising, but in this case it is gratuitous. I wish they didn't show it.

And hearing the TV producer's specious justification for airing the footage (equating it with our current sensationalist cable news) truly made me feel dirty for having sought out this footage on YouTube years ago, because there was a real human being who let the incident do the talking for his legacy. Dwyer mentions in the press conference that he hopes to be remembered for something else, other than the CTA scandal - and dark though this is, he got his wish.

But I do feel that I've gotten a clearer picture about who R. Budd Dwyer was, and for that this documentary is a winner.

7/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
At long last, the story of the man before the blast
Geeky Randy20 December 2010
James Dirschberger's feature-length debut is an astounding portrait of R. Budd Dwyer, the Pennsylvania State Treasurer who committed suicide during a press conference in 1987. For the last 23 years, Dwyer's final moments have been talked about much more than his productive life; so much that it actually has become somewhat of an internet meme despite the event taking place years before people even knew what the internet was. Just three years ago, if you put Dwyer's name into a search engine, all you'd find were suicide related results. Even now it's somewhat difficult to find a picture of Dwyer without the .357 Magnum revolver in his hand… or, in his mouth.

Dirschberger attempts to do the man justice by creating a film that covers more of Dwyer's life than his death. In uncovering Dwyer's life, Dirschberger has brought to light many things that were shadowed during Budd's fight for innocence. The film becomes a tale of an honest man driven to the breaking point.

The 75 minute documentary covers a lot of the man's life and also the story behind the guilty verdict. Dwyer upstaged many of his achievements in life by the way he died, but he made us care enough to look deeper behind how and why he was found guilty… and, even prosecuted in the first place. What's most impressive about the film is that it gives Budd a second chance; it looks deeper into the CTA scandal and it doesn't allow the suicide to center around the plot like some sensationalizing news style article.

To exclude Budd's suicide would deny the impact the CTA scandal had on him, and to include it in its entirety would make the audience focus too much on his death which has already been done for too long. Dirschberger compensates by including the suicide, but taming it down so Budd's story can appeal to more people than just the gorehounds and the morbidly curious.

Interviewees include everyone from family, friends and colleagues to William Smith, the man whose testimony convicted Dwyer. It's a story so controversial and easy to misunderstand; hats off to the crew of "Honest Man: The Life of R. Budd Dwyer" for making all the right moves.

**** (out of four)
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Government is No Place For An Honest (Wo)Man
vkfqlurjqztbolk11 January 2021
In my opinion, Mr. Dwyer represented good people trying to do good things within a system that has zero tolerance for such "Boy Scouts."

I have no doubt that Mr. Dwyer truly believed in American justice, and was deeply appalled and shocked by the "trusted" sources that betrayed him, and the resulting "guilty" verdict.

His small corner of America -- his beloved country -- had failed him, and I figure he knew that he literally could not live within such an evil and malevolent construct.

As far as the film itself, I thought it was tastefully done, and respectful. My guess is, however, that there was much more that could've been covered that wasn't. Still, a good investment of my time, and recommended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
More a response to ShoeBuckle's crap review
ShanerMD24 February 2014
Personally, I liked the documentary. It's not hard-hitting. It's mainly a favorable view of Dwyer's life. However, while I certainly don't think he was without his flaws, I think the film makes a compelling case for Dwyer's innocence.

Ultimately, it accomplishes this through one thing: William Smith's admission that he lied under oath about Dwyer's involvement. For some reason, ShoeBuckle tries to claim "the film TRIES to show he lied at Dwyer's trial". Either ShoeBuckle is not very bright or he has a reason to come back at Dwyer, because there is no trying involved. Smith himself admits it on camera. He repeatedly expresses his regret for this. It's an objective matter.

I also don't know why ShoeBuckle feels the need to attack Dwyer's son's character, but he does. The son is a normal guy, understandably somewhat embittered talking about this whole mess.

I highly recommend you watch the documentary, and also recommend you treat ShoeBuckle's review as the trash that it is.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Honest Man well worth your time.
seaspray9918 March 2011
Honest Man is by far one of the most compelling films I've watched in many years. You do not need to be a political person to become enthralled with this very human movie. From the very beginning to the end you will be engulfed in a story of a man who's life was turned upside down in a moment. Life accounts from his family as well as from his colleagues and video clips draw a picture of man who within 75 minutes becomes your friend or a close relative. You will feel his despair as his trial nears and watching this family man succumb to such a desperate end is a true tragedy. What remains is sadness when the movie is over but with it the hope that the lesson here for us is that while we inhabit this earth together, let us remember to treat each other with respect, kindness and honesty.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
More a party political broadcast meets a eulogy than an actual documentary.
maxwellsnake2430 March 2015
If the purpose of a documentary is to enlighten via the presentation of unbiased facts than surely james dirschberger's 'honest man : the life of r budd dwyer' is the ultimate anti-documentary.From the choice of interviewees (family members,ex colleagues),reluctance to even acknowledge or go into detail about the incriminating evidence against him and finally the completely partisan title of the finished product,you should be in no doubt what conclusions the film's makers want to you to draw about the case.Having had no preconceptions regarding dwyer's guilt or innocence going into watching this (i was merely interested in the story),i was disappointed by the bull in a china shop approach to proving his innocence. Imagine if 'capturing the friedman's' andrew jarecki's superlative documentary about the friedman abuse case took this same approach from the get go,then we'd have missed out on all the rich insight and thought provoking evidence for and against the accused that the director gleaned from both the interviews and the evidence he had procured and would have been left with a glorified celluloid character reference instead. As such 'honest man' is a massively dispiriting misfire that will surely only appeal to those who want quick and easy answers and wont question from whence they came.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
All things sensational have context
StevePulaski28 April 2015
Every viral video or sensational clip that receives airplay or notoriety has a backstory, and Honest Man: The Life of R. Budd Dwyer is a documentary that works to add context to one of the most famous suicides ever captured on video. On January 22, 1987, Pennsylvania Treasurer R. Budd Dwyer, after being found guilty of accepting bribes from a Californian accounting firm, called a press conference before numerous officials and journalists. He was presumably going to announce his resignation, as his sentencing was scheduled to take place the next day. Following a four minute speech about his wife, kids, his innocence, and his legacy as Treasurer, Dwyer pulled a .357 revolver from a manila envelope, pointed it in his mouth, and shot himself, dropping dead instantly having broadcast his suicide to numerous Television stations.

One of the most tragic things about Dwyer's case is that what he did, or allegedly did, while in office, is something that is more-or-less legal in state and federal government today. Accepting bribes, or "political donations," isn't uncommon and since the dawn of Citizens United, is something that special interest groups and lobbyists have been doing in excess. Honest Man works to tell Dwyer's side of the story, which has been shortchanged to the extreme act itself.

Dwyer's wife, children, and colleagues all appear in the documentary and recount his life and the case that eventually engulfed his life. Dwyer studied political science and accounting in college, eventually running for the general assembly when he graduated. Roy Wilt, a colleague and a legislator, comments how politics was who Budd was and how it took over his life as soon as he began running for the assembly. He goes on to say how Budd would never look at the donators who graciously gave money to his campaign, nor could he ever bring himself to ask for money. While intelligent and crafty, he was extraordinarily humble, especially for a politician.

Controversy began to plague his career once he became Pennsylvania's state Treasurer. When Dwyer wouldn't approve of state Governor Dick Thornburgh's wife's plane ticket as a business expenditure, he saw himself on the oust with the Governor. Right then and there, from the perspective of some, Dwyer seemed stubborn as a mule and somebody who was willing to fight over the smallest circumstances. Following this, Pennsylvania discovered that its state workers had grossly overpaid in their federal taxes because of the state withholding funds. This, in turn, led to dozens of accounting firms vying for a multimillion-dollar settlement contract in order to compensate each employee for the amount they overpaid. In 1986, Dwyer allegedly received a bribe from a California accounting firm that was trying to obtain the lofty contract, to which he plead not guilty to, wouldn't agree to a plea bargain, and stood trial in the case.

The main witness to Dwyer's act of taking the bribe, William Smith, even admits to lying under oath in the documentary, saying Dwyer took the bribe during a false testimony. Smith admits here that he is, as a result, responsible for Dwyer's subsequent suicide.

Dwyer's charisma and almost blue-collar, everyman charm is seen through each piece of archival footage shown in the documentary. He was a man of many commonalities, who in and of himself, didn't seem to have any interest in unethical dealings. During his famous final press conference, it was almost as if Dwyer couldn't believe he was in this situation; he seemed shocked, almost like a deer in headlights, as if he had no idea how he found himself in this situation and was more-or-less forced into it.

The death of Dwyer is one of the most bizarre but saddening political tragedies I have yet to read of, and Honest Man does a solid job at detailing it. It's a case that found itself captured in a whirlwind of hearsay and miscalculation that led to the death of an arguably innocent man. Dwyer's surviving children explain in the film not only their reactions to their father's suicide at the time, but how, despite the suicide video's ubiquitous presence online, this kind of thing could happen again. Dwyer's widow, Joanne Dwyer, who died a year before the release of this film, nicely states how we live in a society obsessed with violence, and in this case, violence without much regard to context or history. Both her and her children state how the impact of Dwyer as a political figure and his legacy have, as a result, taken a backseat to the sensationalism and act of his suicide. They're not wrong, and it's depressing to see a story where a sympathetic, and quite possibly innocent, politician has fallen on deaf ears in present time.

Directed by: James Dirschberger.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A True Documentary
elliot-6317 December 2010
Most of us watched this documentary for one reason, we saw Dwyer's suicide video and wanted to know what drove this man to do what he did. If I could sum Honest Man up in one word it would be poignant. At no time does the documentary try to sway you in his innocence or his guilt, which is the foundation of a good documentary, to present history without forcing you to believe what the documentarian believes. I think most of us are going to go into this with the outcome predetermined and we will see it the way we want to see it. I am not an emotional person but watching this documentary there were times that I felt something I'm not used to… sadness. Borrowed time, we are all on it, and Honest Man really shows us that not just Budd, and what went on in his life, but what could go on in any given day in ours. Many interviews in this documentary will stick with me. The only down side is there is very little of Budd himself talking. On the DVD there are a few swearing ins and a little bit of his final speech, in the extras, but what we learn of Budd comes from the memories of others and not his own words. Just to set the record straight the final speech was NOT aired live, it was rebroadcast. Who would care to watch the assumed resignation of a state treasurer live? Yes, kids were off of school that day but they did not see it live!
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Budd is INNOCENT!
SnowDays8215 March 2020
When I first heard about Budd's story, I did what most people do. You assume he was a greasy politician on the take. But give this film a moment of your time and watch as that notion of guilt completely erodes over 90 mins. Budd was a grass-roots, hard working man, an honest man even. He loved his country, his family and his community.

All of this was taken away from him by vile cowards, John Torquato and William Smith, actual criminals, who essencial pointed the finger at Budd for a plea deal. How could this happen in America?

I'll never fully understand why Budd pulled the trigger and I hope his family has made peace with it. I just know that after watching this film I have a better understanding of who he REALLY was and what he stood for.

INNOCENT!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My jaw is on the floor. Powerful doc!
Tacoma_John15 March 2020
One of the best political docs I've seen in a long time. After watching this I now know Budd was an innocent man, railroaded by a corrupt system. A total eye opener. Must watch for anyone with PA roots or an interest in government corruption.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not an "Honest Man"
dazza-0162323 January 2018
It's obvious that the writers of the "documentary" actually know very little about the CTA case. It's an immensely bias piece. Dwyer was as guilty as they come. He used his "task-force" as a smokescreen to hide his true intentions. He handled all matters of the CTA contract for a period of time (and even sometimes told his aids they were not invited to meetings with him and Torquato/Smith). Smith was his old buddy, and Dwyer knew what Torquato was up to. Even before Smith's first trial he stated that Dwyer was in on the bribe. Dwyer was offered a deal by another company who would do the job better, and at half the price, than CTA. Yet he didn't even entertain the idea of awarding them the contract. There was no conspiracy. Dwyer was caught red-handed and blamed everyone except himself. Dwyer's family talk about how Dwyer would not "plea bargain with the truth" yet Dwyer urged his own lawyer to speak to the prosecutor (James West) asking him if he would drop all charges against Dwyer if Dwyer resigned as the treasurer! West did not accept it, and rightly so.

So what do we have with this "documentary"? Nothing really except an uninformed love note to Dwyer. It's almost as if the writers are trying to justify a morbid interest in Dwyer's suicide by going on an uninformed, bias crusade saying he was an "innocent man". But the problem is that he wasn't innocent, and hence he will never receive any official exoneration. Two appeals after his death were dismissed.

Dwyer, clearly guilty, does not deserve credit and attention for committing suicide in public (and traumatizing many many people in the process). This "documentary" may fool a few people, but for those who know the facts of the case, it is mere propaganda.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not so Honest!
scottcook-055776 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I believe a lot of reviewers and of this documentary have not taken in to account that he is and was actually guilty of these crimes. He was not railroaded by the justice system or the media because if you do some research you will see he was completely guilty. They focused on his life which was good and somewhat detailed but it was very very one sided. They do not go into real detail on the crimes he committed and therefor you see him as this great can do no wrong guy. I don't doubt he was a good person and did a lot for his community but he was proven guilty on all charges. Don't blame the media for making this all about the suicide because he knew and does most everyone that he chose to commit suicide in public at a press conference. His family claims the jury was full of uneducated people and that's some of them did not complete high school. To me these comments make the family look bad and hateful. You could have lined up an entire jury with PHD's and the man would have still have been convicted.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
more like "DIShonest man".
dallas-7488910 March 2020
This is a very poor documentary. It is entirely one-sided, starring none other than Dwyer's family and friends. It is edited in a very deceptive way (for example, when William T. Smith speaks, the directors have mangled the film in such a way that it seems like Smith says that he lied about bribing Dwyer. In fact, he says he lied about NOT bribing Dwyer, and that Dwyer did accept his bribe.) The movie completely overlooks the evidence implicated Dwyer in the CTA scheme. For example, there is no mention that in 1980 Mr. Dwyer was allegedly involved in another conspiracy. There is no mention that Dwyer admitted lying to the FBI, and that Dwyer was also involved in pushing through legislation (House Bill 1397 of 1984) that authorized him, and ONLY him, to recover the FICA over-payments. There is no mention that Dwyer awarded the CTA contract to a company with only 3 full-time employees (CTA) instead of a different, world known company (Arthur and Young), with 250 employees, who offered to do the job at half the price. In the movie, they state how Dwyer steadfastly refused to accept a plea bargain, but overlook the fact that Dwyer himself had already tried a bargain with the prosecutor-- he would resign as State Treasurer if the prosecutor dropped all the charges against him. This documentary explore none of this. According to those in this documentary, Dwyer was innocent because he was a nice guy. And the jury were not a jury of his peers, and thus too dumb to understand Dwyer was innocent (never-mind the fact that there could have been a jury composed of professional philosophers and scientists, and they also would have found him guilty). Unfortunately, there is not much of worth in this documentary.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed