Pacifiction (2022) Poster

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A sloooow burner
slabihoud28 October 2022
Taking place on Tahiti, "Pacifiction" takes a long time to set the story in motion, though director Albert Serra gives us some images to think about. The images are beautiful and the camera dwells on many sets far too long. When I finally got to the end of the film I was tired and regretted that I could not feel as I should.

Well, here is the story: The High Commissioner of the Republic of France, De Roller, has little power but tries to keep peace on the island, when some native representatives inform him of a rumor, that nuclear testing is returning to the region.

Of course, everyone is upset by this idea, though no one seems to know anything in particular. But as De Roller starts to investigate, he finds a number of strange things going on, a group of sailors plus their captain, a Portuguese visitor who's passport has been stolen, foreign shady characters are popping up, a submarine has been sighted and so on.

The more De Roller pokes around, the less he can make any sense out of it but he begins to believe that there is truth in the rumor. In between he manages to coach a local dance group for their performance at his favorite night club, where he also chats with Shanna, a transsexual. Shanna has high hopes to become the secretary of the Commissioner, and De Roller certainly gives him reason to think so by taking him along on some of his visits. This relationship does not seem to be sexual, but the film gives no explanation to what it is that draws De Roller to Shanna.

I don't want to go into more details, but the film is certainly too long, I would say by an hour! Running 2:45 right now, there is no reason not to cut it down, some sidelines don't really advance the story. But despite the length, we hardly see any Tahitians who are not wearing costumes and perform for tourists. Which I don't think is close to reality.
25 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
3 Hours of my life I'm never getting back
carrandas23 January 2023
One of those movies that has raving critic reviews but where the audience just doesn't seem to like it.

The movie didn't work for me. I enjoyed the beautful locations and the mood. The acting was good. But the plot just didn't go anywhere. Some scenes seemed to go on forever without adding anything to the movie. I kept up for about an hour and then I just started daydreaming.

When I left the cinema, someone was complaining to me in the bathroom that it was such a bad movie. Another movie-goer put it nicely when walking out the doors: "well, this was 3 hours of my life I'm never getting back".
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pacifiction
CinemaSerf15 May 2023
Benoît Magimel is the easy going French High Commissioner "De Roller". Charged with representing the French Government on it's Polynesian outpost of Tahiti where he travels the island in his chauffeur driven Mercedes glad-handing and pretty much going from party to party. The arrival of an admiral (Marc Susini) and some rather hunky sailors on his island soon has tongues wagging, though. Before he knows it, his placid existence is being disturbed by increasingly popular - and disturbing - rumours that the French are to restart nuclear weapons testing nearby. Of course he is assured not, and makes similar assurances to the population himself, but when local girls start to go missing the presence of the military and a general sentiment amongst the locals seems to encourage a view that it's time to assert their own independence. This creates more problems that begin to cause our diplomatic quite an headache. Can he sort it all out? Is there even anything to sort out? The thing with this film is that it is far, far too long. The story could easily lose an hour and no harm would be done. The plot, political mischief and island intrigues, would benefit from that tightening up too - perhaps sparing us from the many shots of his car! Magimel delivers an efficient characterisation here, but he is largely left to his own devices as the supporting cast struggle to build upon a rather thin storyline that needed a bit more shoring up to sustain the interest as it rambled on. It has it's moments, but sadly just not enough of them. Oh, and it's pretty wet down there!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mesmerizing!
ontoson9 March 2023
Serras thriller is visually exuberant as it is subtle and minimalist in terms of plot. Making good on its lead motto that 'politics is like a nightclub', for almost three hours the viewer sees barely more than Benoît Magimel in his role as bon vivant politician De Moller philandering around the island of French Polynesia, lending an ear to its manifold inhabitants, drinking, feasting, and preaching about his limited administrative role in the grand order of things, interrupted only by stunning episodes of visual allegories on geopolitics. Yet, I found watching De Moller in his ambiguous social interactions infinitely charming and astonishingly engrossing. On its allegorical level I found this movie truly mesmerizing - and I am not easily mesmerized. It is a gloomy thriller about nuclear balance of power, about ants in a battle of elephants, but only behind the curtain and only the abstract. It will therefore appear slow and uneventful to the ones who are looking for some concrete down-to-earth action.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The lead performance carries this elaboration on thunder in paradise
Horst_In_Translation27 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I guess it would be accurate to say that "Pacifiction" is a new French movie, even if it is not super new anymore, but a 2022 release, but what I am mostly referring to there is the word "French" because, if we look closely, this is a co-production between France, Spain, Portugal and my country Germany. The latter surprises me a bit here as I did not see any German impact. The Spanish component surely comes from experienced filmmaker Albert Serra being in charge of both direction and script here. That it turned out more of a French film, also given the language spoken in here from beginning to end, is also no huge surprise as Serra has over the years worked on other films that focus on France rather than his home country. His co-writer here is Baptiste Pinteaux, apparently mostly in charge of the dialogues, and now that is one French-sounding name, so it surprises me that his only other real release has a German title. Maybe he is a bit of an up-and-comer. I am curious to see what the future will being for him. This movie we have here is an extremely long movie as it comfortably finds his way over the 2.5-hour mark. I would not say that it did not drag at all, but given the running time the dragging was not too frequent and very acceptable in total. This film also racked up some nice awards recognition. According to imdb, we find almost 50 awards nominations and the film won almost 15 of them. Maybe, when awards season is fully over, I can cut the two "almosts". The film was for example nominated for the Palme d'Or in Cannes.

But its biggest success were perhaps the Césars, the national film awards of France, where the movie scored nine nominations and won two of them, two categories, namely for lead acting and for the cinematography. Both was deserved I would say without having seen all the competition obviously. I would like to mention Benoît Magimel here especially because it is quite spectacular that he won the César for lead acting twice in a row now. Can he extend it to three during the next edition? We will see. But here, as you can see from the title of my review, I liked him a lot indeed and he was the key reason for the highest heights the film reached, even if they were admittedly not mountain-high either. But they made the film worth seeing. Here, in the movie theaters where I go to, they showed the film only during the weekends and maybe also just one day of the two, so the release was not huge, even if here and there you can also find other screenings in movie theaters I am not extremely familiar with. Then again, it is a big city and still it is a somewhat limited release. I mean it is understandable. There were maybe 20 people there during my screening today, maybe more even, which is not super shabby for a Sunday before noon, but still, a French film that runs for almost three hours is not exactly a crowd magnet. At least here. As a consequence, I would say that the film definitely went a bit under the radar, at least outside of France. I am not sure how many people saw it there, but nice to see it got the attention from awards bodies. I cannot say anything about the cast almost, simply because I am not familiar with the cast members or at least I do not remember having seen them in other films. As for Magimel, he reminded me of a mix between Detlev Buck and Tim Roth in terms of his looks. He will turn 50 next year and is perhaps during the most successful stage of his professional career at this point. I would love to see him more in international films in the (near) future. Also interesting to see how he started his career back in the 1980s as a child actor. There is one French film that many consider among the finest French films ever made.

As for the rest of the cast, I still want to mention Sergí Lopez. I know and like the actor and I think he has solid recognition value, but I must still say I did not recognize him here. I guess he is quite a chameleon indeed. His inclusion makes sense though because this is where Serra's influence came a bit more into play. You will see many Spanish actors in the cast here, a cast that is still not super big given the film's running time. I would have expected more actors in here, more actresses maybe too. This is a really male-dominated film and if there is a female character (or "female"), you can also not be really sure if "she" is not actually played by a guy. Well, "she" is of course as you can see by the very special bra, if you wanna call it that, that she is wearing. But let's not get any further into detail there to make sure certain people don't get too worked up. One thing that deserves talking about instead is the title here. It is a really nice play on words from no fewer than three perspectives even. One is the area where this is set, namely Polynesia in the Pacific Ocean, the second is the link to pacifism with riots and military conflicts being a clear and present dangers and the third and final aspect is the idea of fiction as after all we are watching a movie here and I think the characters you see in here do not really exist in real life. It was interesting in some scenes when we see the main character talk to a man who is not the one with whom he has been talking about before, but that new kid on the block if you wanna call him that is more of a hothead and Magimel's character is not really willing to take it anymore at some point when he puts the young guy in his place and tells him what he thinks about being taught life lessons from somebody half his age. This was one of the more memorable moments for me at least. Of course, we never know what is really going on. The main character also does not know if it is Russia, America or somebody else behind all this. He only knows the aforementioned hothead is mostly of a string puppet and nothing really beyond that, even if he likes to pretend he is.

This is maybe why there is also always this American character around, the one with the glasses who looks as if he is out of an American 1970s movie. Actually, he reminded me of Richard Belzer from L&O SVU. Maybe I am only saying this because Belzer died a few days ago, but I feel like I would have said it otherwise too. A quick rest in peace to Belzer before we return to this French film here and go on with some brainstorming. Another interesting inclusion for me then was when we see what the main character really thinks about this place, that has been his working environment for a long time now. How he really hates it there and has enough of it all and cannot wait to get away and transfer his power and influence to another character. Maybe he was also slightly worried that he might get killed at some point as we have people talk about the possibility of people getting killed and that it is almost a given that people will be injured in what is about to happen. He is not really getting any respect and he could be the next target. It would not have been a huge surprise if the man had died in this movie. Look at the aggression already coming from his opponents when he is reminded that what he is eating is the beauty of their home. Or when there is talk about how the natives are not allowed into the casinos. The main character is fairly good in cracking a joke here and there to remove some of the tensions, but he cannot do it all the time. Eventually, the scenario just gets too serious. The major conflict then is linked to nuclear tests potentially going to happen there and well, when can he do. He is not really a crucial part of the decision and maybe they are expecting too much from him and he could never interfere with these plans or stop anybody from pulling through with them. There is a shadow over the island. Thunder in paradise.

This shadow eventually also catches the protagonist, even if it is not safe to say if he is really on the downward spiral that the other guys (including the Belzer lookalike) say he is. But his words about the island are pretty telling too. Like how he say he will bake them all crispy. This was almost funny to read. Yep, I read subtitles while watching this (and listening to it) in the original French-language version. It was towards the end already. He was talking there to the fella who barely heard anything of what Magimel's character was saying. Oh well. I will just do some brainstorming finally for the rest of it before the review ends: This film also won a César for its cinematography and sounds like a valid choice, even if the area where this got made is definitely thankful environment. The first shot already with the ruby-red sky was haunting. Beautiful, but also in a way threatening and sobering with these gigantic containers that literally get in the way of nature there on the island. It was a but surreal there, so we had a surreal framework as there is no other way to describe the ending. It was almost a psychedelic ending even with what they had it look like. Not really easy to rasp and understand, but it felt like a surreal dream sequence then from a Jefferson Airplane music video with the people on the boat there. Surprising way to end the film and surely different and I did not expect the closing credits to roll in when they did. Magimel's character was a bit out of the picture there already. Some of the earlier pub scenes were also surreal, not only because of the light-and-dark effects. So bizarre. This adjective also fits nicely the elaboration on soldiers or scientists in submarines waiting for prostitutes to be sent to them, sent down into their submarines. The main character was trying to find out what was going on there exactly, but in the end he was also just a string puppet and could not do anything to prevent all this, even if he had found them. France is nothing compared to Russia and America. Anyway, this is it then. This film gets a thumbs-up overall and I recommend checking it out. I am glad I went to see it tonight, even if, except Magimel, there was nothing superb to it.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Apocalypse delayed
emmanuelrabu10 March 2023
Great contemplative film that carries something from Apocalypse Now without apocalypse (unless it's the ghostly presence of Marlon Brando playing tricks on me) and Below the Volcano. A port, a nightclub, the sea, sailors, dancers, receptions - all elements linked by Benoît Magimel. It's a poisonous film whose motives (a submarine, a rumour, political and social relations, violence, colonization, etc.) initiated do not give any tension to the film (it's not a thriller as it has been written), the film is on the contrary a sort of stable state, stirred by waves. The photography is sublime. A magnificent film.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Moody
derek-duerden5 March 2024
Having seen Liberte, I was somewhat ready for the longeurs in this, and the prioritisation of mood over drama and plot.

However, there is a plot of sorts (and even several groups of "plotters" if you go along with the nuclear context and the local determinists) and even a conclusion - no matter how much one might be hoping for something more dramatic. Whether the improvisation-heavy dialogue helps is a moot point.

I've never been to the island in question, but can easily visualise the it's-always-cocktail-time mood and surfeit of ennui that comes across here, making me sorry for everyone trapped in this environment.

Not recommended, as such, but interesting.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The best visuals of the year!!!... on the most boring pic of the year
WolfieLol31 January 2023
Hype has blinded me again, folks... I love slow burn thrillers like The Day of The Jackal, where the actions are shown in the movie step by step, but without losing its suspense and intrigue. I knew that Pacifiction would be slow... but not THAT slow!

This was a huge dissapointment, almost 3 hours of nothing. Serra is nothing more than a pretentious and a egomaniac director, and this movie shows that.

Pure boredom, there wasn't a mystery or even a bit of suspense to keep watching this thing... nothing.

The visuals are the reason why I gave this film a 5/10. Too good for a waste of film this is.

The visuals were so good... that led me to watch this atrocity to good cinema.

God... I'm so angry right now. This is the kind of trash that makes people go watch Marvel instead, the same stupid movie everyday instead of searching for something new and original. Because of the fear of finding a pretentious and boring film like this.
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nasty Serra and his alter-ego
aleXandrugota2 May 2023
All of Serra's films feature an actor in various roles that seems to form an extremely bizarre thread between his films. Lluís Serrat. From "Liberte" I went back in time to observe it better and now, "Pacifiction" confirms my own thesis. Lluís Serrat is the "Witness". He is the silent observer sent by Serra in each film as his own alter ego. The "witness" just needs to find out in order to be able to continue the thread of Serra's cinematic bizarreness. He speaks little to nothing but always looks around, often tilting his head as if he has an obstacle in front of his eyes, or maybe because he wants to see the same moment from another angle. Lluís Serrat is in himself a likeable, even bucolic apparition of an annoying neutrality. He doesn't seem to change anything, he doesn't get involved in anything and when he should (like in Pacifiction) he falls asleep near the car driver. Like almost all of Serra's films, Pacifiction takes its time. The narrative is (only apparently) monotonous, with long moments of silence (as in Liberte). And if Liberte was set in a night setting, in a tangled forest, in Pacifiction Serra proposes a completely different setting, an exuberant one (Tahiti) meant to mislead. The theme of the film is colonialism brought up at one point by the main character played excellently by Benoît Magimel. Again shocking (in a positive way) is Serra's ability to use non-actors (or quasi-unknown actors?) such as the transvestite Shannah. What I love about Serra is how he consistently refuses to force any kind of fracture in the flow of the action. It seems that from the first frame he leaves the filming studios and only calls Lluís Serrat on the phone from time to time to ask him how things are going. And if he is silent, then it means that everything is ok. Excellent film, 9.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This Annoyed me on so many levels.
susiepaterson26 July 2023
Sorry I don't want to go back over the last 3 hours of this drivel. I need to write something to get my review posted so here it is in brief. There is hardly a depiction of anything I could consider an enlightened handling of 21st C societal issues in this way too long movie.

Having been dragged through hours of scenes of what must be the worst night club music on the planet, (Good God, who would sit in a club listening to that shite?) we end up watching the drunk admiral trying to her two scantily clad blokes dancing together. What a perve.

A really awful film full of creeps and exploiters. Yuck.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Dream & power
glinstering20 July 2023
This movie is better than most commentators say. Who has what power is important.

French Marines turn up at a nightclub in Tahiti. Rumors arose about new nuclear tests. The newly posted French Commissioner on the island seemingly carelessly searches for information. Does he know more? Sometimes he is very focused in the conversations and feels for information. From a cockfight, a battle arises that in reality is played more like a shadow play and everyone slowly slides past each other.

The film has a hypnotic atmosphere and melancholy. The landscape, the waves and the skies also draw you into the story. There is beauty in taking the time for the film and the puzzle piece to slowly unravel - as if everything falls apart almost naturally through time - without any effort.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Tedium in Tahiti
Reiher22 January 2023
This is a truly boring film. It's long, seemed pointless, had scenes that went on forever to no good purpose, had essentially no characters to speak of, and made little sense. I can enjoy long, leisurely paced films, like "The Traveling Players" or "Satantango," but there has to be a reason to be patient and a payoff for doing so. There is neither here.

At the screening I attended, the director, beforehand, said that the last 45 minutes was really special. That was a bait and switch, since they were just like the rest of the film. If anyone goes into this film expecting anything at all like a thriller, they will be disappointed, and disappointed for a rather long time.

The director, speaking afterwards, said he wanted to avoid cliche. In one respect, he failed miserably. The dialog, I believe, was improvised by the actors, rather than being scripted. As a result, it was banal, repetitive, and pointless. There is no more tedious cliche than weak improvised dialog.

It's common for one reviewing a long film to say something like "there's a good 90 minute film in there." Here, there's a mediocre ten minute travelogue in there. There are some pretty shots of Polynesia, and a good surfing sequence, but you pay a heavy price to get to those, and if you're willing to watch a long, weak film to see some nice shots of Tahiti, you're better off with the 60s version of "Mutiny on the Bounty."

After I got home from the screening, I cleaned my cats' litter boxes. I found that experience both more entertaining and more intellectually stimulating than "Pacifiction."
25 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring like hell (in the tropics)
matlabaraque15 November 2022
Pacifiction could look like a thriller when you watch the trailers however this plotless story will end up deceiving you on several aspects. As a matter of fact, you quickly realize there is no lesson to extract from this aimless story whose director seems to have had fun deceiving his spectators. All in all, it's a massive disappointement, for a total of 2h45 minutes of soulless and unattractive filming.

When you read the synopsis, one would expect a political explanation about Tahiti, this French "département" with special rules, and let's say an atypical population. Or maybe one would expect a focus on the problems of the islanders or some sort of a a criticism towards this new colonialism represented by this high commissioner called Monsieur De Roller (the main character of the film). However, nothing happens as expected in this film; worse; nothing happens AT ALL !

The so called high commissioner wanders around the island, speaks to his mates, argues with some unions guys, seduces some travestite dancer who is as admirative as suprisingly dumb, but the worst is that you just can't find out any logic to all his actions. You feel left in the lurch, and abandoned by the director after an hour or so as you clearly understand the film is going nowhere.

You never end up understanding who is this Monsieur De Roller (I believe he was a politician for real, but I have never found out his legacy), you never find out why he drives around the island aimlessly, by himself, without any goal, without any vice even (except the one of listening to himself), without charisma except his megalomania and narcissism. The film is full of scenes with long silences punctuated by De Roller's long speeches which are after the second one a massive bore.

Did you say suspense? There is NONE ! We understand quite quickly that the hallucinations of the high commissioner are only the results of his excesses and the contempt of the French government towards the natives.

A real pity if you think about the expectations one could have after having seen the trailers. I wonder if the director did not feel a bit of contempt towards his spectators by leading them astray on purpose with no taste for aesthetics what so ever.

I would keep one scene though... the surfers contest with impressive (one scene only) waves and impressive landscape. Don't waste your time please !!!!
39 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ridiculous, absurdly bad movie!
fwzjfxkrh4 June 2023
It's another critics 5 stars trap of a movie not worth watching.

Apart from the absent story line and poor character dynamics, the editing even fails to capture the beauty of the island and its inhabitants (except maybe 1 sunset shot and a big wave).

Also I found the movie making a few indirect sick suggestions that did not add to my overall appreciation of it. Experimental or not, it did not excite, thrill or manage to raise any kind of emotion.

Basically said it is the worst cinema I have encountered in a long while and would not recommend anybody to waste 3 hours watching this total crap!
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst movies I have ever seen
hlremmen18 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
We were lured into watching this movie by the almost universal critical acclaim and deeply regretted this.

What are my objections?

-Most of the scenes in the film don't make any sense at all and don't contribute anything to the story line.

-The main character is completely devoid of any talent or charisma. We got a feeling that he was playing against his will, as if he was comfortably sitting on welfare and then was forced to take this job to retain his.payments.

-The production looks incredibly cheap and clumsy. So they fake some rain, the guy apparantly stands in the rain but for some reason he doesn't get wet. What is the deeper meaming behind that? We guessed it was because they couldn't afford a spare white suit.

-Apart from the leading character, all other characters are also ridiculous. Take the "evil admiral". He is miniscule, has a squeeky, high voice, doesn't do anything except for getting drunk in cheezy clubs and hitting on big sailors and in the end he sails off in a pathetic rubber boat, accompanied by his 10 favourite sturdy sailors to go and play with nuclear bombs. It could have been a decent Monty Python scence, but apparantly it's not meant to be satire.

-Half of the characters are just standing around, gazing ominously, without any contributuon to either atmosphere or story line.

-It is boring as hell. I really don't mind slow movies, but there is nothing to justify these tedious long shots in this case.

There is one consolation: I read somewhere that the total BO for this film was 283 THOUSAND euro. So except for all the critical appraisal, almost everybody was smart enought to avoid this film. There is still hope for humanity!
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pink Panther minus the comedy
darren-153-89081024 April 2023
Is this film satire? Or a documentary? It's really hard to tell. Did they just say right, ad lib and walk around and we'll film your every move.

It's honestly one of the most boring films ever made. Quite literally nothing happens for 3 hours. A man in a white suit walks around does a few speeches, has a few drinks flys on a plane and goes jet biking. Call the whoop doctor, there's some hard surf action, we'll sort of, you don't actually see any surfing as the camera is too far away. That is it. Nothing happens.

The only way the film manages to interpret the fear that clouds the island is the paranoia of a very creepy man in glasses. Is he the Pink Panther? It's hard to tell. I was kinda waiting for that character to say to "I need a womb".

The film is centred around a night club and the final scene is surreal which actually stopped me from given it a 2 out of 10.

The dude behind was in such a deep sleep that when it ended and the lights came (it was 11.30pm and the staff wanted to go home) they had to wake him. I'd love to know what he thought, I'm guessing he really enjoyed Hos snoozebuster. As I'm sure you will.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Some great things in it but globally disappointing
Portis_Charles22 December 2023
There are some serious qualities there. First of all, who doesn't want a trip to Tahiti?? There are "beautiful shots", as they say: waves, skies, nature, Benoît Magimel pensive on the beach, sometimes on an absolutely magnificent music score. It's a film that can be just admired as is.

It's also a film that can be used to admire Magimel, to hear him speak, wavering, a little mushy, always on the verge of tripping over his feet... It's quite fascinating.

But his performance is not enough to compensate for a slow mise-en-scene by default, rigid, flat, desperately sterile. It is the disease of a certain European-Asian festival cinema which under-cuts its mise-en-scene out of ease and habit. Despite everything, there are some exciting ideas here and there, never to be forgotten, a woman framed in a certain way for no particular reason, that's something but that's not much.

And then what do Magimel and the others really have to say anyway? The story is of very questionable interest. He is a high commissioner of the French Republic who navigates between local councilors against a backdrop of rumours of a resumption of nuclear tests in the region... I've heard of more exciting stories.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed