The End (2008) Poster

(IV) (2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Crime pays
Ali_John_Catterall26 April 2009
Crime pays. And it really began paying out in the run-up to the millennium, as numerous old lags started getting their pensions topped up from the proceeds of true-crime merchandising. After decades of seeing their dark power half-inched by punks and football hooligans, former East End gentlemen were reclaiming their 'Sixties appeal as shotgun-toting clothes horses and pop culture icons - lending their mugs to photo shoots, magazine columns and bestselling autobiographies. And, of course, movies: for better or worse, the Britcrime genre was also reactivated in the 1990s, a mixed legacy the UK film industry still hasn't shaken off.

For those who wanted to hear the chaps too, Tricky's Durban Poison label released its 'Product of the Environment' CD, in which ex-Kray associates and rivals such as Charlie Richardson, 'Mad' Frankie Fraser and Tony Lambrianou reminisced over techno soundtracks. "Certain stories can be a bit gruesome" Product's producer told the press in 1999. "I cut out a lot of what they said." Edited for mass consumption, 'Product' soon nestled comfortably on the racks alongside Gangsta rappers, reassuring buyers with the information that a percentage of its profits would go to "providing musical equipment and boxing facilities for deprived kids".

The End (a 'Duckin and Divin Production') is simply another reworking of 'Product', a deliberately distressed and scratchy documentary of talking heads, sporting the same sinister techno score and added subtitles for non-Cockneys. It's directed and produced by the twin Collins sisters Nicola and Teena, former actors and catwalk models who starred in Snatch - and are themselves a Product of the Environment in question, as their father is convicted armed robber Les Falco. The End, therefore, is an attempt to ask their old man, alongside other aging East End crims, "What did you do in the (turf) war, dad?"

Whatever your position on the subject matter, The End will confirm all your prejudices. If you think these people are a misunderstood bunch of geezers who only hurt their own and live by an internal code of ethics, this will confirm it. If you reckon they're rabid animals who deserve locking up for a long time, this won't change your opinion one iota. And if you're a sociologist who believes that lives are entirely shaped by economic forces, you're really going to dig this. (It even begins with a quote from Aristotle: "Poverty is the parent of revolution and crime.")

So if you're looking to box tick clichés, bring lots of paper. Bring reams. Every stereotypical statement you can possibly imagine is trotted out by these charming, twinkle-eyed sociopaths, from the one about how post-War poverty turned them to crime - "9 out of 10 EastEnders started out doing a bit of villainy" apparently (discounting the vast majority of law-abiders who didn't) - to the one about how "the Krays done a lot for under-privileged kids and charities" and that old favourite, "Reg Kray taught me empathy, to always think of the other person's point of view before you react".

Hang on. What? Reggie Kray taught bare knuckle boxer-cum-armed robber Roy "Pretty Boy" Shaw about empathy? Maybe there are some surprises to be had here. The uninitiated might also be interested to learn these guys detest the 'G' word. "Gangsterism is a fallacy, put about by newspapers and films to glamourise it" scoffs 'negotiator' Mickey Gonella, correctly. Everyone prefers terms like "rascals" as if pouring acid over somebody's head to melt their brain, an incident vividly described here, were something you might find in The Beano. Yoiks, the Little Rascals have nailed Biffo the Bear's ears to the table again!

Gonella's disparagement of 'glamourised' crime is tellingly at odds with The End itself, which employs a heavily stylized approach, affording a supposedly gritty glamour to the proceedings. Imagine if the film stock were untreated. The distancing process would be lost. And this would immediately become unpleasantly banal - merely footage of people who hurt or threaten other people for money.

But in fact like other forms of porn, this is mostly just another come-on. The gents might talk a lot, but listen closely - they actually say next to nothing about committing the crimes for which they're convicted (though proudly talk about the bullies, nonces or grasses they've bashed up - painting themselves as virtual Arthurian knights). And nobody dares admit to the worst thing they've done. Instead, we mainly hear about things they've witnessed; a deadening, numbing litany after awhile, though snatches of dialogue occasionally pull you up short: "I pulled back his ear and tried to bite his throat completely out."

In the second, philosophical half, a few chaps describe turning to the ultimate Godfather. "Everything you've ever done, He'll forgive you" swears fight promoter Alan Mortlock. "It's like the Old Bill tearing up your criminal past." It doesn't mean he's gone soft though: "I'm Born Again - not born yesterday!" The old guard also mourn the 'death' of their beloved East End which, they say, has lost its atmosphere and all those "funny characters and geezers" of yesteryear. Nobody admits there's probably just as many 'funny characters' there today. It's just, unlike everybody featured here, they might not be white.

Mostly, it's business as usual: non-existent levels of self-awareness allied to breathtaking amounts of self-justification. "I'm not the bad guy" muses 'international debt collector' Mickey Goldtooth. "They're the bad guy for not paying the money, right?" Although Falco admits: "I thought of myself as a sort of a Robin Hood - everyone else thought I was a robbin' bastard." And Shaw, formerly imprisoned for years, confesses: "I've wasted all my life. It's a mug's game."

Yet the saddest and profoundest statement flashes by so quickly you could very easily miss it: "We don't take life serious. We just take life."
23 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Collins twins' home movies.
mistabobdobolina7 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
"The End" doesn't have very much new to say about gangsterism per se. Apart from the fact that British gangsters protest (unconvincingly) about the word "gangster," they do much the same brutal things that gangsters in other places tend to do, many of them lead the same dead-end lives, some of them swagger while a few others talk about finding Jesus and all of them talk about how it's not like the good old days anymore with all the immigrants about... and beyond that, none of them is going to reveal anything compromising or ground-breaking on camera. This is a group of guys getting together to help out a mate whose daughter has talked him into appearing on camera as part of her film project.

So it's a home movie, essentially, distinguished only by its underworld subjects and with a few editing and filtering gimmicks meant to distract us from their carefully stage-managed banality; a few particularly gruesome yarns aside, they all take such pains to portray their criminal careers as just a bit of youthful boisterousness and paint one another in the same neutral, uniform "he's just a nice guy" tones that it's almost comical. Almost.

The most convincing testimony of the lot is "Guv'nor" Les Falco's body language. As he shifts about and hems and haws, it couldn't be plainer that this is a man who desperately wants to be anywhere else, doing absolutely anything other than talking to his daughter on camera about his criminal career. I can understand that; I almost feel the same way about watching him.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A film in 2 halves?
alasdair-macdougall-111 March 2009
I attended a special screening in the East End of London of the 70 min version of this very personal documentary, directed & produced by twin daughters of one of the (real) East End ex-gangsters.

The first half was the best using ECU/CU/MCU shots of the ex-gangsters as they catalogued their inter-gang violence, which match Godfather I for horror content. Understandably they could only talk about crimes for which they had been caught & tried, which makes you wonder what other worse things they may have done! It also used a very specific editing style, which helped build a threatening atmosphere to match the content - not quite confessions as they mostly seemed quite proud of their ultra-violent reputations.

The second half was less consistent, with a inter-mix of sub-themes: reflections on their early lives; how each handled 'retirement' to normal life; views on the East End now vs then; etc. Whilst many of the individual elements were interesting, I was left wondering where the film was going. The editing was also less stylised & consistent.

The screening was followed by a Q&A with the director & producer. It was quite poignant that they retain their E London accents though they now live in LA, where the film was financed & presumably edited. The documentary is intended to explain what led their father & his friends into such a violent life of crime, and to be a record of the old East End, which has changed beyond all recognition. In that I think they have succeeded.

Don't be put off seeing it because of my modest score - I would have scored the first half much higher & it is definitely worth a look.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a nice documentary
dragokin25 February 2012
A well done documentary containing some first-hand information about the life in the East End in mid-twentieth century, apart from everything you would expect from a movie dealing with the underworld.

What strikes me the most is that the motif of "good old times" pops up, when the communities were close-knit, everyone knew everyone and respected the elders. Not that this stopped the interviewees from being "robbin' bastards", to quote one of them...

But when you think about it, the description might fit any city in the world from times of WWII until raising the Iron Curtain and arrival of internet. In particular when talking about the 1950's and 1960's, you hear stories confirming this from anyone who witnessed them. Life was simpler and less hectic back then, if not happier.

Then the real question is why these times are mentioned in such a nostalgic context by people that committed all sorts of deeds punishable by law in any civilized country. They even label "old school" those who still follow the patriarchal code of the era. Have the others forgotten about it or simply accept that it is alright to pursue your own happiness by any means necessary as long as you can get away with it?
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Instant Classic
greghudderson7 May 2009
As a stream of gangster films are churned out one after the other, along comes a gem that could quite possibly be the best and most real account of its genre for a while.

The quotability factor of this film is endless "I thought of myself as a robin hood and everyone else thought I was a robbing b#%*ard" says Les Falco, "we don't take life serious, we just take life" says Mickey Gonella & "crime pays" says Danny Woollard. But don't let me paint a picture of a group of hardmen playing up to the camera, its the opposite. What I saw was a group of men that were born into a bad state of affairs who made a choice, one that they thought would change their lives around. The film opens with an Aristotle quote "Crime is the parent of poverty", which if you look around the world rings true and is a harsh reality.

The film is stylish, black & white with a Anton Corbijn feel. The only feminine quality to the film is the voice behind the camera, which is the other credibility the film has. It is made by Nicola & Teena Collins, daughters of one the men in the film Les Falco. It is apparent that the girls know a thing or two about film-making as well as the underworld that they reveal.

Quite honestly an incredible piece of work. An instant classic that you will watch over and over again.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
excellent
tommymongola30 March 2009
I got an early screener of the final cut of this documentary. It is gripping, different, poetic and damn right brilliant. What I found the most interesting thing about this film was how matter of fact it was, in a nutshell honest. You really are not being led down a false path, what you are hearing is the truth and you don't feel cheated by the subjects or the director. I loved the style of the film, its super cool, it adds to the content perfectly. If you ever get the chance to see this documentary, its a must. The first half is very powerful and has the most disturbing content but then just when you can't take anymore, you get a moment of beauty and a complete turn around of events. I will not spoil the film as I could but lets just say its not what you expect, we see a side of the subjects that is rarely seen, if ever. Its interesting to feel some kind of connection between subjects & director, it makes you feel like you are watching something very personal. I am a huge fan of this documentary, impressive work, bravo. 10 out of 10
4 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Honesty Realism Excellent Story Line
andrew_zito4 June 2011
Sorry to use some of the language I used to describe this great documemtary film on my website blog at http://zito.biz/fuckyou but there is no other way to describe things.

Shows some of the rationalizations that people in compartmentalization of anti-social thoughts use that is now all so prevalent in the governmental, by law enforcement as well as criminal circles. The difference between criminals and law enforcement officials is that when law enforcement does it they do it as part of the system, that using their standing in the system, use the system as a weapon as a crime against society, whereas common criminals use it as a personal matter as individuals.

This is a great documentary with all sorts of a very honest commentary which is good but frankly it is not something that was ever duplicated on the police or law enforcement side of the social spectrum, as in reality it is the police and legal authorities who are the most dishonest of the bunch using their powers every day for personal gain and satisfaction rather than purely social good.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed