The Sons of Sam: A Descent into Darkness (TV Mini Series 2021) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
102 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Some reviewers didn't get the point
ericanaess7 May 2021
If you think this documentary is about Berkowitz, then you will be disappointed. I suspect not all the negative reviews made it to the last episode where it really reframed the story.

The descent into darkness mentioned in the title is not about Berkowitz's descent into darkness, it's about the journalist who got too obsessed with the case.

There are some aspects of the storytelling that could be better, but we thought it was interesting enough.
120 out of 133 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
obsession defined
ferguson-65 May 2021
Greetings again from the darkness. Obsession can take many forms, and a few are on display in this latest Netflix docuseries from filmmaker Joshua Zeman. For those alive in 1977, you likely remember the reign of terror in New York City due to the ".44 Killer", later known as "Son of Sam". Fear was pervasive, and the shootings that actually started in the summer of 1976 but not connected until months later, mostly seemed random, which added to the public panic. Despite the title, Zeman's docuseries is not so much about the murders, but about one man's obsession with proving the 'Son of Sam' was really more than one person, and that the relief felt by citizens after the arrest of David Berkowitz, was misplaced.

Maury Terry was an IBM employee with an exceedingly inquisitive mind. His interest in the Son of Sam case pushed him to slowly evolve into an investigative journalist ultimately convinced that the NYPD had closed the case too soon, and not approached his own level of in-depth research and detail. Terry's work is presented here after being delivered to Zeman in three boxes after Terry's death. Paul Giamatti reads Terry's own notes and book passages, and Zeman fills the four episodes with archival news clips, Terry's own videos, shots of newspaper clippings, and interviews (past and present) from family members, cops, journalists, and even surviving victims. There is a recounting of columnist Jimmy Breslin's time as a conduit to Berkowitz, a clip of Berkowitz's father's press conference after the arrest, and a fascinating tale of Maury Terry's first date with his ex-wife ... anyone looking for a good dating tip should ignore this segment.

Towards the end of the first episode, we see the iconic video of David Berkowitz smiling at the camera as police take him into custody. Since a (at the time) rare .44 caliber pistol was found with him, and Berkowitz confessed to the murders during his interrogation, the NYPD was quick to go on TV and announce to a relieved citizenry that the streets of New York were again safe, and Son of Sam was behind bars.

However, for Maury Terry, the case and the evidence just didn't add up. He was intrigued by many bits and pieces. Berkowitz stated that his actions had been guided by a 1000 year old demon through his neighbor Sam's dog. Additionally, the variances in police sketches drawn from eyewitnesses over the year simply didn't add up to being the same guy. As to Berkowitz himself, the personality of the Yonkers postal worker didn't fit cleanly into the police profile either. The more skeptical Terry became, the more doubt his research created. The final 3 episodes really focus on the case work he performed over decades ... especially his belief that the murders traced back to a satanic cult.

The show is well crafted as it connects us visually with Terry's writings and findings (including his 1987 book "The Ultimate Evil"). We see 'The Devil's Cave' and get a nice overview of the neighborhood where Terry spent much of his time investigating. We also head to Minot, North Dakota and Stanford University to gain intel on how those two sites tie-in to the case. Additionally, there's a possible connection to the Charles Manson family. The show is elevated by real life occurrences such as the letter Berkowitz wrote to Terry, and how seemingly unrelated murders might have a connection. In fact, by the end of episode four, we can't help but take note of the chain of dead bodies beyond those of the Son of Sam victims. Could it all be coincidence, or possibly the result of Maury Terry stretching too hard to make his case?

Crime shows are big TV ratings business these days, and this one blends the best of that with a notorious real life event. Having the retired Police Captain Borelli defend the work of the police somehow doesn't make us feel more satisfied with their findings, and by the end, we are just as skeptical of Terry's beliefs as we are of the department's proclamation that Berkowitz acted alone. Of course, the highlight of the show are the videos of Terry interviewing Berkowitz in person at Attica. This was influential for Netflix's brilliant series "Mindhunter" where Oliver Cooper played Berkowitz. We are tuned in to the body language of a guy who has been in prison for years. Even more than 40 years later, the events prove traumatic to revisit, and are only made creepier by Terry's theories. Were his theories on the right path or was he a lunatic conspiracy theorist, as many described? It's only now that we can question the accuracy of Berkowitz's first letter to Terry when he told him, "The public will never truly believe you." Whether accurate or not, there is no questioning Maury Terry's obsession with the Son of Sam case. Zeman's docuseries will tax your armchair detective skills and leave you wondering what's real.

***NOTE: the opening credits of each episode feature a rocking version of "Season of the Witch" performed by Joan Jett. It's certainly not the chilling version by Lana Del Rey or the psychedelic version from Donovan, but it's the perfect fit for this docuseries.

Releasing on Netflix May 5, 2021.
72 out of 95 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent documentary
Calicodreamin9 May 2021
The first two episodes were strong sticking to the truth, the second two kind of descended into conspiracy and madness. Certainly interesting in terms of new theories about the son of Sam killings, and things I had never heard before. The documentary itself had good flow and used archival footage and interviews relevant to the cases.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Correlation is not causation
lu_lou_belle5 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This is an enjoyable dive into one of the stranger of the strange events in the early days of post wide- eyed optimistic america. I was aware of it as a middle schooler in suburban small city Louisiana when my life was school, the pool, and my changing body. It was horrific even from far away. But our world was full of lurid strangeness, pre-cable tv crime and mystery series full of cultish murder, court cases for the Manson clan and Patty Hearst, protests against Disco, the Jim Jones cult, and the death of Elvis. There was a boogeyman under every bed, behind every tree. In north Louisiana 'The Town That Dreaded Sundown' wandered through dreams and summer camp stories, as did the rumors of what happened on 'bloody (hwy) 98.'

The first episode hooked me, suggesting that maybe not all was what it seemed with such spectacularly well publicized murders in a faraway important place. Occam's Razor suggests its quite possible that there was a rush to judgement of a convenient scapegoat in closing down a brutal series of events during a particularly rough period in NYC. (Really cold winter, blistering heatwave in the summer and the famous Blackouts (overwhelmed electrical grId)during that heatwave). Spike Lee's Summer of Sam is a wonderful exploration and depiction of the era and events, if you haven't watched.

The actual focus of the documentary is the obsession of Maury Terry, as described by old friends and associates, not an in depth study of evidence and history. Based on material presented I could plausibly make the case that the difficult Carr family might have met tragic ends through the cumulative effect of family trauma, dysfunction and alienation leading to ultimate tragedy, and a criminal justice system focused on results and closure during an nyc era of unrest, economic malaise, and bad outcomes.

Unfortunately the obsession of the investigative journalist goes down the infinite rabbit hole of satanic conspiracies, which are apparently everywhere once you start looking, as a pattern seeking human being. Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum approaches this obsession and it's ultimate futility. By the 1980's the satanic panic was swinging for the fences. I hate to see this docuseries take this turn without offering more pushback, particularly in the high drama high paranoia age we are living through right now. Bad thing happen, there are horrible people in this world doing horrible things. Innocents suffer. Just think about the West Memphis 3.

Nonetheless the presentation is well done and the interview with Berkowitz is riveting.
30 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching
rhnickles10 May 2021
It's worth watching but you must watch the entire series. All four episodes. Why? Because the fourth episode puts everything in context and does a nice wrap up that brings everything together to make sense.

The middle two episodes go down the rabbit holes of conspiracy theories pretty heavy. I think some of it was conspiracy, but my thinking is some of it was peer pressure. Some of it was copy cat and some of it crimes of opportunity, some of it was people getting their kicks by committing a heinous crime.

The series was entertaining and very informative. Everyone who watches the series will feel differently about it. It wasn't phenomenal but it was definitely worth watching.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The documentary was well done
mszuzii17 February 2023
I like the fact that the documentary lets you form an opinion and both sides are in it. However, after watching it I feel like it's just a conspiracy. "Son of Sam" showed multiple types how smart he is and how articulate he is. Of course he will play you, he wanted fame or recognition. Now maybe the satanic cults were true but I don't think it's relevant to the murders. I think he enjoyed the power he was getting, the evolutionary type sentiment. I feel if Maury would've let him talk freely and not be leading, David wouldn't know to fill the void. David was playing Maury like a puppet and obsession does just that.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Definition of Obsession.
henryshear9 May 2021
The title of this series does not represent the crimes of David Berkowitz, but Maury Terry's dogged pursuit of the various crimes of the Son of Sam. Many claim that Terry was a conspiracy theorist, but there are far too many coincidences that occurred for his views to be false.

The NYPD committed a series of mistakes in their investigation and they were desperate to find a perpetrator. I will not go into their mistakes, but Sons of Sam states what they are. Son of Sam would not exist if the NYPD had investigated further. It might have been something similar to how those reference Manson such as The Family.

Some of the information that is said in the series is questionable. Terry became consumed by the case until it became his life. He could never quite fit the puzzle pieces together and it devastated him. People's lack of interest, the lack of help from the NYPD and the fact that no one seemed to take him seriously negatively impacted his life. Sons of Sam shows that, most likely, there were multiple killers involved with these killings. This fact was corroborated by Terry's research.

Most of the information in the show needs to be taken with a grain of salt. However, there is one piece of information that I find very plausible: as many as five killers were involved in the Son of Sam killings. Others will view this docuseries and think different thoughts, but I was astounded that the NYPD refused to further investigate the crimes. New York was crime-ridden in the 70s, but this is still no excuse. Politics should never come in the way of justice.

I personally want to thank Maury Terry for all of his research and his numerous discoveries. His research gradually ruined his life, but the Son of Sam crimes will forever be seen differently. If you are a crime buff and unaware of certain events regarding the Son of Sam crimes, I highly suggest you watch the show.
58 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watchable but missing pieces
justagirl-386457 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
While others may complain about the deceiving title, if they read a summary of it before watching it would be obvious this was about Terry's obsession around the SOS murders/attempted murders and conspiracies he believed. I don't have any issues with Giamatti narrating in the first person as others did; these were Terry's thoughts and I'm not sure how others below expect him to narrate himself as he passed away.

The first episode was a little droll for those of you who were there or alive during that time or read about the murders - it added nothing new to the context or situations of the murders themselves. The second episode is mostly droll as well but ends with a cliff-hanger to get you to the third and fourth with the conspiracy-laden pieces and how they were tied together in Terry's mind.

The missing piece for me was the haphazard way the findings of the Pine Street Irregulars was hurried over and how they came to their conclusions. It also seems to be missing other potential victims/unsolved crimes tied to the main members of the alleged group. Why has no one taken a photo of either of the Carr's to the witnesses who saw a blonde man enter the church at Stanford around midnight when Mrs. Perry was brutally attacked and killed. Although her killer was ID'd via DNA, could more than one person have been involved or present? How about the other crimes near Stanford during the early 70s that are still unsolved? Is there a tie between Mrs. Perry's killer, Stephen Crawford, Ms. Perlov's killer, John Getreu, and the group? Where did the Carr brothers travel during the 70s and who else did they associate with before their untimely death? Was the gun that John Carr was killed with ever examined to possibly tie it to some other crime? Was the missing gun of Sisman ever located or the bullets examined to determine if they matched with another crime? What else did the Carr sister know?

So many possibilities to further a theory but none of them pursued by the remaining members of the Pine Street Irregulars is disheartening and certainly doesn't help the docuseries make it's case more complete and concrete. With today's scientific advancements, surely more could have been done before production - or maybe there isn't anything there...
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Several sons
Pairic10 May 2021
The Sons of Sam: New documentary series about The Son of Sam murders. It gives the background to the killings and the accepted story that David Berkowitz was the lone gunman. But it moves on to suggest the involvement of others and makes a decent case that two brothers may not just have assisted Berkowitz but actually carried out some of the slayings themselves. It then goes further to suggest involvement by The Process Church of the Final Judgement (and their Scientologist origins), Charles Manson and even the murder of a "Snuff" film producer. There certainly was evidence in the case which was ignored by police and a series of strange deaths but perhaps the net is cast too wide here to create an all encompassing conspiracy. Nevertheless it is an enthralling tale as it outlines the obsessions of one man, Maury Terry, who pursued alternate theories of what was really behind the murders. Written & Directed by Joshua Zeman. On Netflix. 8/10.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another Too Long Show With No Real Definitve Resolution
AudioFileZ6 May 2021
This is more the Maury Terry Story than a Son of Sam one. That's O. K., but it goes on for a longer time (4 one-hour long episodes) than it needs to in view it hardly proves Berkowitz.actually had accomplices. Maury never proves his conjecture that Berkowitz did not act alone and in the process he kind of stops living. This is a sad thing as Maury probably prematurely died because of his forfeiting living a joybul life in lieu of trying to convince the police they got it wrong. That was, of course, Maury's choice but the victims had no choice at all. That is the horrific tragedy of the Son of Sam murders. While Maury is interesting he came up empty and after four hours I'm feeling similar.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A long but satisfying watch
pmtelefon18 May 2021
I was a teenager living in Bellerose, Queens, NY (about a mile away from the site of the third shooting) at the time of the Sam of Sam killings. I've been a believer in the multiple shooter theory for many years. "The Sons of Sam: A Descent into Darkness" does a nice job explaining what happened. I'm only gripe is that it should have been shorter. Maybe three parts instead of four. Many moons ago the TV show "Unsolved Mysteries" covered the same material in a half an hour. Just for the record: the case has never been closed in Queens. It's an open cold case.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Flimsier ground
Leofwine_draca16 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Another well-made serial killer docuseries from Netflix, although they're on shakier ground here with less material. The first episode, chronicling the Son of Sam slayings in '70s New York, is gripping; the next three follow one ex-reporter's obsession with proving that a Satanic cult was linked to the crimes, but his evidence is flimsy at best. Thus it becomes sort of an exploration of one man's obsession with the case in a similar way to Robert Graysmith's obsession with the Zodiac killer, but you get the impression that Maury Terry is no Graysmith and some parts here I don't buy at all. Interesting stuff, and I plan to read his book at some point to see if he has more than just theories.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
First episode is good, then meh
Echobelly9 May 2021
The first episode provides an interesting recap of the events surrounding the Son of Sam murders. Once it devolves into conspiracy it's still interesting but only sort of.
27 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watch this anyway if you're dig true-crime and form your own opinion.
TreeFiddy5327 May 2021
This was a decent 4-part doc on: 1. The .44 Killer aka the Son of Sam killer from 1970s in New York City.

2. About a journalist's obsession in trying to convey his version of the story and why the crimes were a part of a larger problem. More about the latter than the former.

If you like true crime docs, you'll like this because of #1 and #2 could be interpreted in two ways and since the entire show IMO has more of #2 than #1, if you like this show or not will come down to how you look at the journalist's story.

I'd say watch this anyway if you're dig this genre and form your own opinion.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I dozed off
frosty-444317 May 2021
For some reason this really didn't click with me and i found it a borefest tbh. I think the narator was dull.
13 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting story but horrible pacing
Movi3DO9 May 2021
Killers, Cults, and Obsession.

A new crime Netflix documentary about the Sons of Sam and the conspiracies surrounding the group.

The story was pretty interesting. The killer was revealed pretty quickly, but the show wasn't about the killing, it's mostly about what happened after. The theme was about how unhealthy obsession can bring the downfall of man. There were many real footages and images that made the story more appealing and elevated the mystery.

However, the biggest flaw was the pacing. I almost felt asleep couple of times. I don't get why they had to stretch certain parts so much and repeat stuff so many times. Each episode should just be 45 minutes at most instead of 1 hour.

Overall, fairly interesting story, but horrible pacing ruined the mystery and tension. 6/10.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Both Can Be True
Gswillis24 May 2021
Maury can be right about there being more than one shooter AND he was an egotistical nut job who wanted to be famous.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gripping
frankfouraschen5 May 2021
This one will take you on a four hour tour of New Yorks finest misguided pride and a reporter who just can't let go. Although the tale is not something you want to acknowledge by any positive words, it is, however, fascinating. Old interviews, old images of NY, footage of days long gone. Detectives with oversized moustaches and glasses. The Son of Sam has it all. Topped with some twists and turns, the episodes have enough to keep your attention. And finally a series where there is a beginning and an end. You may not like the outcome, but you will be entertained.
38 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad but the book is much better
ennischris-135334 February 2022
I feel like there were a lot of important details that were left out of the documentary. However, I really enjoyed learning more about Maury Terry, the author of the book The Ultimate Evil which this documentary is based on. I found the various interviews very insightful but the series shouod have easily been a few episodes longer.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Compelling
DebraIonaVogel7 May 2021
It's a very interesting new look at a case we all thought we knew. Cut and dried, right? Well....

Maury Terry, a former technical writer for IBM had a brilliant analytical mind. He was convinced there was more to this case than fits the narrative we all knew so well. His deep, relentless dive into this case is fascinating. Because of it, he left IBM and became a newspaper writer. This case, though, it never let him go. We get a lot of information.

We're introduced to other people whom may have been involved, there are undeniable links. Or coincidences. You'll have to decide.

I'll add this. David Berkowitz, now, is a very well known born-again Christian. He's never getting out of prison and knows that, so it's not a ploy to garner favor from the parole board. He is aware of the horrendous crimes he committed and agrees he should never walk free.

However, he has ALWAYS stated he was part of a Satanic Cult. Which makes the case, the series sound crazy-I get it. But, what if that's true? That there were other people involved?

It's an interesting watch. Some people are going to dismiss the whole thing as nuts. I didn't. I'd never heard of Maury, but believe he was correct.

Watch and decide for yourself.
28 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Interesting Look at The Son of Sam Case
tkdlifemagazine26 November 2022
This is a look at the Son of Sam case from the perspective of an investigative reporter determined to reveal that David Berkowitz was not the sole actor in the infamous crime spree. Maury Terry, through documentary footage, interviews, news clips, and narration by Paul Giamatti, unfolds a detailed conspiracy theory that involves a Satanic Cult, the real sons of Sam Carr, and, even, Charles Manson. Whether you buy this conclusion or not the documentary is a good overview of one of the most infamous cases in NYC crime history. The 1993 Interview with Berkowitz himself is one of the most interesting elements. This together with the suicides and mysterious deaths around the other In Berkowitz's circle raise serious questions about the NYPD's ultimate conclusion. Worth watching.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
eye opening and interesting
JonanthanNewOrleans14 May 2021
Not sure where all the bad reviews come from ,

Very informative docu-serie with a lot of new information and research.

8/10.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Whyyyy Paul Giamatti as the narrator?!
karen_netscher14 May 2021
In general I love these kinds of mini series. "Fear City; New York vs The Mafia" was great! I just don't understand the narration by Paul Giamatti. He has the worst voice to be the narrator! I'm already annoyed by his voice when he's acting any part, let alone listen to him narrate a whole series. His tone of voice and pronunciation are just cringe worthy and having to listen to him ruins it for me. He takes me out of the story everytime he opens his mouth. Whoever decided Paul would be right for this has got some serious thinking to do.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not what I expected in a bad way.
Zedyeti6 May 2021
As someone that lived in nyc during the time of son of Sam I can tell you it was a very frightening time and this doc had moments that reminded me of just how scared everyone was. I expected the doc to present the case in a way like the night stalker doc, from beginning to end. Did not realize it was the focus of Maury terry and his fascination with the case being a satanic cult thing with multiple conspiracies being thrown at you. This ruined it for me. Also the Paul giamatti narration as terry was little weird and it dragged on far to long with the perspective they were trying to focus on. Yes it was a very different time and when bad things like this happened, they always had a satanic angle for it happening. Maybe it's true, but Terry's lack of evidence and seeming more like he was trying to stay in the spotlight really ruined whatever this doc was trying to do. Netflix really needs to break away from the conspiracy theory crap in their documentary's cause people will believe it without the need for actual evidence.
59 out of 109 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unnecessary Paul Giamatti's voice
spinoff7512 May 2021
This is not a documentary about Berkowitz is about a journalist obsessed with the case (Maury Terry) but the first person narration made by Paul Giamatti (as Terry) is annoying and unnecessary. Director, writer, and producer made a poor choice with that. It would be better a neutral tone, third person, impartial.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed