When one of Parker's aliases receives jury duty, Nate forces her to go, resulting in a showdown between the team and a corporation tampering with the jury.When one of Parker's aliases receives jury duty, Nate forces her to go, resulting in a showdown between the team and a corporation tampering with the jury.When one of Parker's aliases receives jury duty, Nate forces her to go, resulting in a showdown between the team and a corporation tampering with the jury.
- Paul Richards
- (as John Christopher Storey)
- Granny
- (as Norma Micheals)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe judge is played by Kitty Swink, who is married to Armin Shimerman, and also has a Star Trek connection, as she appeared in two episodes of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993). Armin is one of seven actors who were credited in all 173 episodes of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993). The character is named Quark.
- GoofsThe mark Ms. Earnshaw (Lauren Holly), is purported to be a skilled chess player. However, in one scene she is seen moving a pawn diagonally, from one black square to another, without taking a piece, something pawns, by the rules, cannot do. However, Ms. Earnshaw demonstrates throughout the entire job that she never plays by the rules. Since she cheats in everything else, it's reasonable to assume that she cheats at chess.
- Quotes
Eliot Spencer: [roleplaying] I love apples. Apples are my favorite fruit.
Parker: Good for you, Sparky.
Eliot Spencer: I-I don't have to sit here and take this crap.
Sophie Devereaux: Go on. Just do it for me.
Eliot Spencer: You have an orange, alright? Now convince me that I want the orange, not the apple. Gonna take a bite. You-you...
[takes a bite]
Parker: [evilly] I put a razorblade in that apple!
Eliot Spencer: [spits it out] Are you serious?
Parker: Maybe. But do you know what doesn't have a razorblade in it? This orange. Don't you want it?
What follows is staged as a chess match, with Nate and company trying to win a favorable outcome for the plaintiff. With the trial already underway, Nate concludes his only option is to force a settlement, which Earnshaw has ruled out. While Parker tries to ingratiate herself with the other jurors and Hardison and Eliot Spenser investigate which jury members Earnshaw has bribed, Sophie poses as an Indian pharmaceutical executive to convince the trial's defendant, supplement company owner William Quint, to go against Earnshaw and settle the case in order to gain a better buyout than Earnshaw is offering him. They soon discover that they face a forceful and determined mark, who will do whatever it takes in order to guarantee a favorable verdict.
The moves and countermoves between the two sides is just one of the enjoyable aspects of this standout episode. It's aided enormously by the guest performances, particularly Lauren Holly's as the calculating Earnshaw, and Brent Spiner's as supplement company owner William Quint. Yet it's Beth Riesgraf who makes it all work as well as it does. In the first episode centered around Parker she proves more than up to the task of delivering the performance viewers came to expect while at the same time developing her as a character in ways that pay off over the course of the series. It helps to make the episode the best of the first season, one that is a great example of the show firing on all its cylinders.
- academic-drifter
- Apr 28, 2021
- Permalink
Details
- Runtime42 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1