As the title says. The actress is attractive, and the fighting is decent. Yes, she is a little old to be college age. But I enjoyed this flick. Seen on Tubi, the free streaming site.
34 Reviews
Started well. Ended badly.
gfrank194625 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The premise was similar to "Hanna," "Nikita" and the like. It started well, but the ending got dumbed down. The heroine had multiple opportunities to "take the shot," but clearly should never have been trained to use a gun as, in her hands, it was no better than a club. Even her assassin/spy father failed to put down the two hench-people when given the chance, even after killing everyone in sight on his previous missions. I kept "shouting "Shoot somebody, damn it!" several plot points were telegraphed early, so there were no surprises or plot twists. Overall, rather predictable.
Beat me up and then beat me up some more
farleym-1944222 April 2021
This is not art, this is not cinema, this is a way to pass some time. Bad guys beat the crap out of the good guys but guess who wins in the end. Scarlett as a college student takes a real stretch of the imagination. She looks like she enrolled in college after the birth of her forth child but oh she can kick.
The good news: it's available for free.
The good news: it's available for free.
Extremely Frustrating To Watch
Hammer-Rocks12 June 2021
Potential to be great but never getting there.
The protagonist of the movie while skilled in self-defence and firearms is also extremely dumb tactically. The character made too many mistakes for someone who's supposed to have been prepared and trained all her life to keep safe and stay alive. Maybe the father should have put in the hours to do some intellectual training, to go with her physical training.
She kept making obvious mistakes, after mistakes, after mistakes as the movie went on. This made it soooo frustrating to watch. In the end, I started hating the character.
Her dad on the other hand is one cool S. O. B.
SUMMARY: The movie was a tad predictable, and bringing nothing new to the genre, but had moments of goodness (not brilliance).
VERDICT: Its watchable (albeit frustratingly so) on a dull boring day.
The protagonist of the movie while skilled in self-defence and firearms is also extremely dumb tactically. The character made too many mistakes for someone who's supposed to have been prepared and trained all her life to keep safe and stay alive. Maybe the father should have put in the hours to do some intellectual training, to go with her physical training.
She kept making obvious mistakes, after mistakes, after mistakes as the movie went on. This made it soooo frustrating to watch. In the end, I started hating the character.
Her dad on the other hand is one cool S. O. B.
SUMMARY: The movie was a tad predictable, and bringing nothing new to the genre, but had moments of goodness (not brilliance).
VERDICT: Its watchable (albeit frustratingly so) on a dull boring day.
Women and children are saints...
umeshrw-9182810 June 2021
Horrible movie. And I am not even talking of storyline and plot holes. The idea that women and children cannot kill is being too far stretched. Let the world burn but a woman will not kill. Let bad guys kill 100 people but a woman will not shoot a bad guy to save them. What are these moviemakers thinking? Morals go both ways. And her father can kill everyone. That is ok because he is a man? Nowadays there is too much snowflaking in movies. This is a prime example of it.
This was put together by seasoned filmmakers?
Top_Dawg_Critic20 June 2021
The cheapest boxed wine will pair well with this cheesy excuse for an action film, that has more plot holes than Swiss cheese. It started off promising, then quickly became a grueling 103 minutes of nonsense, repetitive ridiculous and irrational action scenes, and a story that couldn't be any more predictable. This film could've easily had 1 hour of film landing on the cutting room floor, and you'd have the exact same story, only told shorter and more enjoyable. The score was annoying and overbearing and the cast performances were unbelievable. This had amateur C-grade film written all over it, and felt like a failed high school drama class project. I'm shocked this was even green-lit to market.
Pretty good
juneguy5731 January 2021
Wrong cast
dmulele5 July 2021
Worth the watch
rdamian19638 May 2021
33 years old
RDennie19 June 2021
Entertaining. Worth a watch
julieklund2 January 2021
I didn't like a bit
projeshsindurakar9 June 2021
Daughter has no common sense
jpc-1925 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I can see this can be like life, train someone as much you can but building character is the hardest. Her fighting skills are decent. He he needed to train her in common sense as she seems dense in that area, She needed training on negotiations and how to kick someone in the nads. She gives up her gun multiple times. She tries to do a swap in the the lair of the gang by her self. What were the explosions for - nothing. She doesnt want to shoot at people so she passes the chance to get guns multiple times. Her questioning of people who know where her dad is bordering on saying oh please tell me, wont you, when they are restrained. Not much to cheer for when the players are this bad.
better than I expected
gtenalokes12 June 2021
Poorly written. Don't waste your time.
rswengel-6067227 June 2021
This plot has so many holes and factual issues that the writers clearly had no clue what they were doing.
For example, the main character shoots a propane tank and blows it up, killing two men. The tank is next to a house. Later in the film, she returns to an undamaged house.
The dialog is workable but the illogic of the plot makes this unwatchable.
For example, the main character shoots a propane tank and blows it up, killing two men. The tank is next to a house. Later in the film, she returns to an undamaged house.
The dialog is workable but the illogic of the plot makes this unwatchable.
Great action, worth the watch
LeAvantGuardian13 January 2021
Couldn't get past the 30 something college student
jtn-804856 December 2021
Sufficiently thrilling and purposefully bereft of nuance
I_Ailurophile11 June 2021
If Lifetime is to drama as B-movies are to horror, is there a particular term for action-thrillers that follow that same direct, unsubtle slant? Because 'Scarlett' is full of it, from the very beginning - and it's an irresistible delight.
I'm not familiar with most of the names here, though I've seen Melanie Stone elsewhere and know she's a very capable actress. I don't know the films of director John Lyde or writer Brittany Wiscombe, though at this point I'm genuinely excited to learn more. I don't think a movie can be this plainspoken, pointedly forsaking nuance, without deliberate intent and effort behind it. It takes work - and I applaud the product of that labor.
The title flashes on-screen within seconds, in large, scarlet letters - see what they did there? The opening scene depicts a generically cloaked figure infiltrating a compound while the guards they evade seem altogether disinterested. The camera abruptly cuts to a shot of a piece of furniture at the precise moment that Scarlett (Stone) bumps into it, revealing plot development. Our protagonist makes decisions that defy the training she was supposedly raised with.
The antagonist expresses great frustration with a display of violence while shouting not an expletive, but "Jeez!" Characters fail to don all proper PPE in a laboratory setting. There is a forcefulness to fight scenes that to me betrays not that they're unpracticed, but perhaps that an expert choreographer was not involved in production. But then, maybe I'm wrong - if effects artists can revel in the splatter of cheesy, fun horror flicks, why can't a learned fight coordinator take joy in orchestrating a scuffle as plain as the writing behind it?
As visible as actors are in any given movie, they are often the first to garner our derision if a feature in any way falls below our expectations. Yet there's a distinct difference between a performer being incapable of convincingly inhabiting a role, and a performer being instructed by their director to lean into the flavor of a role. No one in 'Scarlett' is going to be mistaken for Chiwetel Ejiofor or Jennifer Connelly, but just as it takes a great level of skill to express boundless emotions with nothing more than one's eyes, there is a craft to withholding any such expression, or to portraying a character with conscious bluntness to the same effect. I find no fault with Stone's performance, nor that of anyone else here.
The narrative in 'Scarlett' is hardly revelatory, but it's sufficiently engaging to keep watching. It's certainly not perfect though; the constant back and forth of capture and escape grows to be a bit much, and a writer of any skill level should know better, even in a film like this. Moreover, I rather wish that the protagonist were given more agency. Even as Scarlett is undoubtedly the heroine of this tale, there's a measure of constraint to how she is written, as the movie repeatedly reminds us she's not a master spy, her training was secondhand, and this story is almost more about her father than it is about her. If your screenplay centers a character, then they should definitively feel like the center.
Ultimately, 'Scarlett' isn't really fulfilling, but it's entertaining. Melanie Stone and her costars play their parts well, as they are directed to do for this screenplay, and the unquestionably straightforward course of the narrative is fun in its forthrightness. We celebrate horror films that tell stories with a similar approach, and the lesson should be applied to other genres, too - so just sit back, relax, and enjoy the cheesy sport of it.
I'm not familiar with most of the names here, though I've seen Melanie Stone elsewhere and know she's a very capable actress. I don't know the films of director John Lyde or writer Brittany Wiscombe, though at this point I'm genuinely excited to learn more. I don't think a movie can be this plainspoken, pointedly forsaking nuance, without deliberate intent and effort behind it. It takes work - and I applaud the product of that labor.
The title flashes on-screen within seconds, in large, scarlet letters - see what they did there? The opening scene depicts a generically cloaked figure infiltrating a compound while the guards they evade seem altogether disinterested. The camera abruptly cuts to a shot of a piece of furniture at the precise moment that Scarlett (Stone) bumps into it, revealing plot development. Our protagonist makes decisions that defy the training she was supposedly raised with.
The antagonist expresses great frustration with a display of violence while shouting not an expletive, but "Jeez!" Characters fail to don all proper PPE in a laboratory setting. There is a forcefulness to fight scenes that to me betrays not that they're unpracticed, but perhaps that an expert choreographer was not involved in production. But then, maybe I'm wrong - if effects artists can revel in the splatter of cheesy, fun horror flicks, why can't a learned fight coordinator take joy in orchestrating a scuffle as plain as the writing behind it?
As visible as actors are in any given movie, they are often the first to garner our derision if a feature in any way falls below our expectations. Yet there's a distinct difference between a performer being incapable of convincingly inhabiting a role, and a performer being instructed by their director to lean into the flavor of a role. No one in 'Scarlett' is going to be mistaken for Chiwetel Ejiofor or Jennifer Connelly, but just as it takes a great level of skill to express boundless emotions with nothing more than one's eyes, there is a craft to withholding any such expression, or to portraying a character with conscious bluntness to the same effect. I find no fault with Stone's performance, nor that of anyone else here.
The narrative in 'Scarlett' is hardly revelatory, but it's sufficiently engaging to keep watching. It's certainly not perfect though; the constant back and forth of capture and escape grows to be a bit much, and a writer of any skill level should know better, even in a film like this. Moreover, I rather wish that the protagonist were given more agency. Even as Scarlett is undoubtedly the heroine of this tale, there's a measure of constraint to how she is written, as the movie repeatedly reminds us she's not a master spy, her training was secondhand, and this story is almost more about her father than it is about her. If your screenplay centers a character, then they should definitively feel like the center.
Ultimately, 'Scarlett' isn't really fulfilling, but it's entertaining. Melanie Stone and her costars play their parts well, as they are directed to do for this screenplay, and the unquestionably straightforward course of the narrative is fun in its forthrightness. We celebrate horror films that tell stories with a similar approach, and the lesson should be applied to other genres, too - so just sit back, relax, and enjoy the cheesy sport of it.
Watchable, but inconsistent.
devon-c-miller5 September 2021
It was watchable, but there were some moments that made me cringe.
She gets in the car and pulls the battery from her phone. Ok, smart move, prevent someone from tracing you. (Um... I haven't had a phone with a removable battery in decades.) But then she uses the phone from the safehouse and is surprised when someone shows up.
We see a flashback of her and her dad at the gun range where he comments on her grouping. Then she shoots at the the two guys who show up at the house and hits a propane tank 5 feet to the left.
She gets in the car and pulls the battery from her phone. Ok, smart move, prevent someone from tracing you. (Um... I haven't had a phone with a removable battery in decades.) But then she uses the phone from the safehouse and is surprised when someone shows up.
We see a flashback of her and her dad at the gun range where he comments on her grouping. Then she shoots at the the two guys who show up at the house and hits a propane tank 5 feet to the left.
Good watch
rogerd-8765510 February 2022
Pop corn 🍿 movie
mrlarrytwiseman5 October 2021
Well, a time waster.
garcinder-2213920 August 2023
I probably should NOT have expected to be more than mildly entertained with this one. People in Hollywood need work, earn money, pay bills, etc.
Unfortunately, it didn't even meet those criteria. I also dislike the fact that I have to write SIX HUNDRED CHARACTERS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A REVIEW.!!
THAT'S A FURTHER RIDICULOUS REQUIREMENT!!
SO, I'LL PROVIDE A REQUISITE SIX HUNDRED CHARACTERS. WHAT SHOULD I PROVIDE?
The ALPHABET? NUMBERS? Something in a foreign language? Choices, choices, and even more choices.
I expect the requirement owes to the fact they want to eliminate frivolous reviews, along the lines of, "I liked it!", or "I hated it!", or whatever similar nature.
Unfortunately, it didn't even meet those criteria. I also dislike the fact that I have to write SIX HUNDRED CHARACTERS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A REVIEW.!!
THAT'S A FURTHER RIDICULOUS REQUIREMENT!!
SO, I'LL PROVIDE A REQUISITE SIX HUNDRED CHARACTERS. WHAT SHOULD I PROVIDE?
The ALPHABET? NUMBERS? Something in a foreign language? Choices, choices, and even more choices.
I expect the requirement owes to the fact they want to eliminate frivolous reviews, along the lines of, "I liked it!", or "I hated it!", or whatever similar nature.
Good Plot. Bad Execution
sklarjoackson31 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The movie had all the materials to be pretty good. It has one of the usual cheesy plots, where the parent is kidnapped, and the child goes to find them, ect... However, the execution is terrible.
Scarlett acts dumb throughout the entire movie, yet they talk about her as if she's some super talented genius-fighter, though she's beat up in almost every fight.
The relationship between her and her father is introduced by her being angry at her father for teaching her how to fight and preventing herself from being Sexually Assaulted because it makes her a 'freak'.
She claims she's mad because her father never tells her why he trained her to be such a good fighter and only tells her, "It's so you can protect yourself." but then reveals that he told her that he's a GOVERNMENT AGENT in a classified position as if that isn't a valid reason for him wanting her to know how to protect herself.
Any actual good reasons they give for her being mad are brushed off as things she's only slightly angry about, yet she's furious over mundane things.
Before he goes missing her father tells her, "Don't trust anyone." and she proceeds to trust the extremely suspicious guy she just met and take him to their SAFE HOUSE.
Even when she finally finds her father, she gets herself captured as well and her father saves her numerous times, even in his injured state.
The fight scenes with her father are pretty good but the fight scenes with just her, SUCK.
Scarlett acts dumb throughout the entire movie, yet they talk about her as if she's some super talented genius-fighter, though she's beat up in almost every fight.
The relationship between her and her father is introduced by her being angry at her father for teaching her how to fight and preventing herself from being Sexually Assaulted because it makes her a 'freak'.
She claims she's mad because her father never tells her why he trained her to be such a good fighter and only tells her, "It's so you can protect yourself." but then reveals that he told her that he's a GOVERNMENT AGENT in a classified position as if that isn't a valid reason for him wanting her to know how to protect herself.
Any actual good reasons they give for her being mad are brushed off as things she's only slightly angry about, yet she's furious over mundane things.
Before he goes missing her father tells her, "Don't trust anyone." and she proceeds to trust the extremely suspicious guy she just met and take him to their SAFE HOUSE.
Even when she finally finds her father, she gets herself captured as well and her father saves her numerous times, even in his injured state.
The fight scenes with her father are pretty good but the fight scenes with just her, SUCK.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
