This show if full of nonsense from both sides, BBC failed to produce a documentary here. It feels like a disjointed clip show that follows no logical narrative.
For example, why is there a whole section dedicated to the smoke on the south side of WTC 7? Why don't they show the layout of the site? There are plenty of photos of WTC 5/6 burning just 20 m from it - with heavy smoke.
And no, the smoke can't be from WTC 7 because the fire would travel (over 7!!! hours and we'd see broken windows on the sides!
Worst of all, the amount of smoke is completely irrelevant to the discussion.
And of course, there is no relevant discussion about the state of the fireproofing in WTC 7 nor its adherence to building codes. Instead, we get out "CD" guy who sides be the official story that a single seat failure collapsed the building - yet in the same breath - says that it would take a year to wire the building for demolition! You can't have it like that, either it was sooo sturdy or it was sooo badly built. What's worse, the internal ramp directly connected to mechanical floors 5 and 6 where the transfer truss were located, so wiring it would not be a problem, a week with 5 persons should suffice.
Of course, later insurance littigations clearly showed that the fireproofing was badly applied and that the building was poorly constructed.
And of course, there is no relevant discussion about the state of the fireproofing in WTC 7 nor its adherence to building codes. Instead, we get out "CD" guy who sides be the official story that a single seat failure collapsed the building - yet in the same breath - says that it would take a year to wire the building for demolition! You can't have it like that, either it was sooo sturdy or it was sooo badly built. What's worse, the internal ramp directly connected to mechanical floors 5 and 6 where the transfer truss were located, so wiring it would not be a problem, a week with 5 persons should suffice.
Of course, later insurance littigations clearly showed that the fireproofing was badly applied and that the building was poorly constructed.
