"Fringe" Pilot (TV Episode 2008) Poster

(TV Series)

(2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Jaw-droppingly good...
Chalice_Of_Evil1 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, so I made a bad pun - but, come on! How could I *not*, after seeing the co-pilot's face melting and his bottom jaw falling off? The opening scene to this series was definitely a memorable one. It built up tension very successfully. The lightning storm may have been a little dramatic, but it certainly made for great atmosphere (and excellent moody lighting). It played on fears of knowing there is absolutely nothing you can do to escape something truly horrific (in this case, being exposed a contagion that makes your skin melt off). It was ghastly, creepy and damn effective, I thought. It certainly captured your attention. The shot of the plane, from a distance, floating quietly through the storm clouds contrasted nicely with the horror and screaming going on inside the plain. Then, as if things weren't unsettling enough, we hear nicely eerie music begin to play which leads us into the the excellent opening credits. The Fringe theme sums up this show perfectly.

Our heroine for this series is Agent Olivia Dunham (played by Aussie actress, Anna Torv). I've seen some comments about her being "too serious" and such, but that's utter rubbish. What were you expecting? She's not exactly going to be all smiles and laughter, given her job/the type of situation she's in, is she? Torv is believable in this role, showing Olivia's strength and confidence, which makes her not just some simple pushover. This is a character who could've easily been very one-dimensional, but Anna Torv brings depth and credibility to the show. The way she stands up to her boss, for example, had me cheering (given what an ass he was). She's not a "wannabe tough chick" at all, but someone who you can buy as an FBI agent. For an an example of her excellent acting, you need look no further than the scene of her crying, but trying to hold it together, after she finds out some shocking/devastating information about the person she cares most about. That was one of the best/most convincing displays of someone, on the verge of losing it, that I have ever seen. Watch that scene and it'll become clear that Anna Torv is a very fine actress (obviously some people won't admit it/refuse to acknowledge this, as they can't see past her looks and simply dismiss her as "just a pretty face"). She plays both strong an vulnerable to a tee.

Since I mentioned her boss in passing, Broyles (Lance Reddick), I should probably explain what I didn't like about him. First and foremost...his attitude. The way he talks to Olivia is condescending, unprofessional and quite simply RUDE. After the way he talks down to her (in particular, the way he calls her "liaison"), I couldn't blame her for the attitude she gave him (I'm surprised she didn't sock him in his Skeletor-like face). She takes what he dishes out and gives as good as she gets. His attitude towards her was completely uncalled for (especially considering what Broyles' friend did). He shouldn't have been resenting Olivia for putting away someone who assaulted three women. Admittedly, though, Broyles *does* lighten up on the 'assitude' (in regards to Olivia) towards the end of the episode - which I was thankful for.

John Noble (another Aussie actor - best recognised from the Lord of the Rings) plays Doctor Walter Bishop, the "mad scientist" of the show (whose previous work is the reason for all the strange goings on that are occurring). After spending 17 years in a mental institution, he can be forgiven for acting a bit odd. Noble manages to ground the character and keep him from descending into a parody. He spouts technobabble a lot, but somehow makes it sound halfway believable. He also supplies a lot of the show's humour (which mostly comes from the odd/random things he'll pipe up with all of a sudden).

Joshua Jackson, meanwhile, does an admirable job playing Walter's son, Peter (although he's unable to make calling Olivia "sweetheart" sound anything other than forced). Mostly, he's there to be sarcastic and say "this is crazy/insane!" a lot, but he does admittedly play off both Olivia and Walter quite well. These three are the characters at the heart of the show and, thankfully, they're all likable. Kirk Acevedo, as Agent Charlie Francis is also likable, and he's at his best when interacting with Olivia. He manages to bring out a side of her that none of the other characters seem to. Mark Valley serves his purpose as John Scott (Olivia's squeeze).

While the "fringe science" element to the show can be quite out-there, so long as you're ready to accept that the show has some fantastical/highly improbable aspects, you should be in for quite a ride. Just in this episode alone we have see-through skin, robotic arms and sharing dream states with a person in a coma (as well as apparently communicating with a dead person). It's what makes the show enjoyable.

This first episode (which benefited from a longer runtime than typical episodes on TV, as it allowed the first episode to take its time introducing the characters and premise, while not feeling rushed like a lot of 'Pilot' episodes do) was a great start to the series. It was well-directed (nicely shot scenery, with all that snow), the effects were impressive and I actually like the 3D-type lettering that tells us where we are. I think it's great how they're worked into the scenery (and you keep expecting someone to run into these giant floating letters and go, "What the hell?!"). I should also mention Gene the cow. Gene is great also. It seems J.J. Abrams, along with co-creators Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, has managed to do it again, and created another excellent show that actually *delivers*.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Promising Pilot
claudio_carvalho6 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
In Boston, a flight from Hamburg lands at the Boston's Logan Airport with passengers and crew dead with decomposed corpses. FBI Agent and liaison Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv) and her partner John Scott (Mark Valley) are assigned to the investigation team by the Security Agent Phillip Broyles (Lance Reddick) and they follow a lead to a container store. Out of the blue, the find a suspect that blows up the location and Agent Scott is burned by chemicals but surprisingly survives totally burnt. Olivia has a secret love affair with Scott and they are in love with each other; so she researches who might save his life. She finds the name of the brilliant Dr. Walter Bishop (John Noble), who has been interned in a mental institution for seventeen years after killing a guinea pig of his experiments. She seeks help with his son Peter Bishop (Joshua Jackson), who is a genius but estranged to his father, and they rebuild his laboratory with the support of Agent Astrid Farnsworth (Jasika Nicole). Olivia accepts to be submitted to an experiment to find the responsible for the murders and her investigation leads them to the Massive Dynamic Corporation, where she is received by the executive Nina Sharp (Blair Brown). Now they need to find the suspect and the chemicals that have burnt Scott to save his life.

"Pilot" is a promising pilot of this series created by J. J. Abrams among other writers. The genre can not be labeled (maybe the same of "X-Files") and the line between heroes and villains is blurred. Anna Torv, Joshua Jackson and John Noble perform interesting characters with great lines. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Pilot"
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant start to one of the best TV shows of all time
namob-4367311 August 2022
Rewatching this amazing show and starting with the very first episode I tried to focus in on details since I know there is a lot going on that I am sure to have missed previous. I also focused in a lot on the acting and oh boy... these people can act. Watching the camera zoom in very close on facial expression and eye movement and see all of these fantastic actors sell every single scene without even talking. The acting on this show is so beyond 99.9% of all other TV show it is not even funny.

There are a few clunky things in this pilot - such as the initial chase leading up to the explosion, or how Olivia suddenly get a lab and other equipment to her team with no red tape or resistance. Good luck with that within the real FBI.

But such small misses or imperfections only stand out because everything else is so fantastic.

This is a 9/10 and compared to almost anything today the standard set on this show is so high it is hard to even imagine anything like it today. You need to go back to the first seasons of GoT or watch the best of x-files to come close to the level of Fringe.

If you have never watched this show, you should do it right now. TV does not get better than this.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Within 75 minutes sets up a show you'd be wrong not to watch...
jrarichards23 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a veteran of "Fringe" now coming back to episode 1 of series 1 after a number of years. And of course I'm here to tell those who haven't yet indulged to do so. In trying to recommend the series to the surprisingly large number of potential fans who've never watched I always tell them that "it's like the X Files, only good".

Unlike many a pilot, this one does remarkably well in telling you what you can expect, and makes it remarkably clear why this is NOT just another Scully and Mulder.

It begins with a plot line soaked in the sad and tense reality of the post-9/11 world, yet heading off into really wild, weird and wacky territory from the absolute word go. And, make no mistake, this episode begins SCARILY, big time.

Almost immediately we get to meet Anna Torv's character Olivia Dunham, and let's suggest right away that 50% of the audience at the very least have a reason for watching on right there. Dunham is spellbindingly, breathtakingly, mindblowingly GORGEOUS. Beyond sexy, beyond lovely, beyond, beyond... But this builds up too from the kind of person she is. A bit impulsive, occasionally a bit messed up, an alluring, exotic, erotic mix of the pushy, tough and sassy ... and vulnerable. Fan of Gillian Anderson as I really am, Dunham is everything Dana Sculley ought to have been - a million miles from cold, stuffy and wooden - a real, live, ever-so-slightly flawed force of nature. OK, so I'm just in love with this character, I admit it.

But five minutes into the playing, we CARE about Dunham - it's magic. Rather quickly we are then introduced to two other characters that start to matter very quickly indeed. One is Peter Bishop, the bright-spark, somewhat-troubled rebel actually more conventional than he seems played by the amazingly Larry Hagmanesque Joshua Jackson, and the other is his on-screen dad Walter Biship, played with accomplishment and an awesome mix of the nuanced and non-nuanced by John Noble. Make no mistake, this is one joy of a role for Noble to play, and he puts his all into it, giving us much of the vulnerability and quirkiness that mental illness denotes. And again we warm to this at-times-childlike character almost instantly.

The three are also joined by further worthwhile FBI types all good in their way, that's the ever-reliable Lance Redick as Dunham's at times grumpy boss Philip Broyles; Dunham's assistant Astrid Farnsworth played sweetly and with aplomb by another very attractive person, Jsaika Nicole; and a semi-partner of Dunham's called Charlie played by Kirk Acevedo. Here is yet another sympathetic character who hits the ground running and is irresistible.

Throw in to that the joys of Agency life, wherein resources and money are no object where the topic really mattters, and you have indeed got the makings of a great series.

And that's precisely what we do get, and it goes far beyond "monster of the week" in presenting us wild storylines woven around people who are nice, real and so very much worth following through their many and varied adventures to come.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Glimmers of the Pattern
injury-6544712 June 2020
A promising start, but not without hiccups.

It feels like it takes inspiration from the X Files and such shows, without being a blatant knockoff.

I did like it - but I can't help feel there are too many questions and not enough answers. I guess that's what a Pilot is supposed to do though.

This idea of "the Pattern" is rather nebulous at this stage. The whole world is their lab? Very intriguing.

I felt the ending was a little contrived - in terms of explaining how "the gang" is getting together to investigate these "dangers". I hope subsequent episodes solidify the motivation of Joshua Jackson's character to be a part of this stuff.

My favourite characters were the Bishop father and son. They had a fun dynamic and also the most entertaining dialogue in the episode.

I found the lead actress's performance a little flat at times. Comes across as a bit robotic.

The sci-fi stuff was fun, with the mind merging and whatnot. The face melting was a great way to open the show.

I just want answers! Who was Scott working for? What's happening with the Bell corporation? What does Broyles know that he hasn't told? What is the Pattern?

I'll get frustrated if we don't get answers.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Clever, fun, witty, strong, engaging, and a solid start to a new promising series on Fox. A pretty good execution of it's premise.
Darwinskid13 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I had first heard of Fringe back in July as I saw a TV spot saying "From J.J. Abrams" and "The writers of Transformers."( I have enjoyed most of their work by the way...) I checked out other TV spots via you-tube and it looks intriguing, as did the plot form what I read about. The premise is nothing new, but in this day and age practically everything seems to be done before, I think now it just depends on it's execution. In my personal opinion, and final verdict, I thought this was pretty well handled.

Our series begins on a plane where some odd disease of some sort of substance infects the entire human population on it. The plane is auto piloted so it has a safe landing, but not a soul is alive. Agent Olivia Dunham( Anna Torv) is called in to assist in it's investigation, along with her FBI boyfriend John. The following day the investigations takes John and Olivia to a location where they find some odd Frankenstein-like experiments and they also spot a man outside( possibly connected to all this) and begin to chase after him, the man presses a button and the entire area goes up in flames. Olivia isn't hurt that much, and John still lives, but become infected with the same substance found on the plane, it can't be cured and he will die. Olivia is now determined to find a cure as she puts her back into searching more into the plane, the disease, etc. She comes down to finding out that one of the creators of the substance, and other projects, top secret projects( Dr. Walter Bishop; John Noble) is still alive and is in a mental institution. To help her find it and know more about the doctor, she and her team find his son, Peter Bishop( Joshua Jackson), in Iraq. Peter has doesn't have much love loss for his father, but helps out when Olivia says she'll show the FBI his file. They go to the mental home and pick up the doc. Dr. Bishop is an odd fellow, but is not a complete whack job, he is still the genius he once was. But even so, he needs a lab more comfortable to him, a real niche. Dr. Bishop wants to do a mental experiment where Olivia can interact to John, this will help them find their leading man and give more hope to solve the mystery of the plane and the cure for John's disease. The experiment is successful and now they have a lead, can they find him in time to save John? Or perhaps John is already saved?

This episode, being the pilot, gives an introducing to the characters, all of which are both enjoyable, and interesting. Olivia is strong, Peter is both funny and serious, and Dr. Bishop is the odd but smart scientist who has an understanding with some people.

This episode had a good balance with it's dramatic element, tensions, seriousness, and even comedy. It never felt mixed to me.

The comedy is kind of witty( and not cheesy), sort of random at times( but still balanced), but funny. Keep in mind, humor is sometimes a device to help make the story more accessible to audiences, and let's be honest you need a wide audience for television to help the ratings, Orci, Abrams, and Kurtzman are following their pattern like their previous projects. For the money, this helps a lot of people. Let's also consider that this is the kind of show not trying to be the most darkest thing ever to come to television.

The acting isn't bad, but I had a little mixed feelings regarding Anna Torv's performance; at times it felt like she was out of the place compared to everyone, and at times it felt like she was a fine fit for it and better than anyone else. I personally think she needs to be a little more sarcastic when her character delivers a joke, she was a little too serious at times. Everyone else I had no problems with, Joshua Jackson is funny, engaging, and so is John Noble as Dr. Bishop. Lance Reddick is mysterious, hard, and demanding as Phillip, and Mark Valley is likable and has a good turn later with his character as he becomes quite intimidating.

What also makes this pilot a good start is that it takes the "What happens next?" element and extends it and executes it flawlessly. I was filled with "Awe" many times. I hope this element play just a big a part in future episodes. It really is the flavor and layering for the cake.

If you like the works of Kurtzma, Orci, Abrams, CSI, The X-Files, and House, this is your show. Very recommended, but if you don't like the above please give it a chance, you might like it. I would also encourage others who hated it to check out the next episode, and the one after that. This isn't a movie, it's a show, there will always be good and bad episodes to it, that or off beat moments to one's POV especially.

Fringe is compared a lot to the X-flies, I personally never cared for the X-Files, but this pilot really entertained me more and hooked me more on it than the X-Files did in it's entire run. I don't know about you, but I am definitely checking it out next week.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Revisiting Fringe: S1
XweAponX4 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
FRINGE: Assembly Required

I recently bought the full DVD set of all season 1 Eps. The DVD Extras are what make it, they explain a lot, many of my conjectures regarding the story are confirmed.

As I reviewed this incredible Pilot Ep - One of the best of all Network TV, It is one piece of quality work. The show, as Lost, begins with an Airplane incident. JJ Abrams himself really did not want to start like this, he had trepidations... But in the end, he stuck with the story as it begins here.

An Airplane flying from Germany to Boston has Richard Stieg's Brother (Both played by Jason Butler Harner). As he has a diabetic attack, he injects himself with what he thinks is his "medicine" - But we get a big surprise and a horror scene to impel us straight into a nightmare realm.

We get a very short and visually stimulating title sequence, and The very next scene has Olivia (Australian Actress Anna Torv) humping agent John Scott (Mark Valley of Human Target). From Horror to Comedy in 5 minutes, we get a clear picture of how this show is to be served up.

As Agent Scott and Olivia investigate an underground laboratory, there is an explosion which causes Scott's body yo begin liquefying... And Olivia's investigation turns up Walter Bishop (Lord of the Ring's John Noble) - The only way to get to Bishop is via "immediate family" - Enter Peter Bishop (Joshua Jackson) as Olivia has to fly to Iraq to pick him up.

Walter is released in Peter and Olivia's care and through a series of conundrums, they solve the dissolving flesh syndrome - But not before Olivia's Boss Colonel Broyles (Lance Reddick) hand picks her for his new team. She reluctantly agrees to continue, and so Olivia, Peter and Walter are joined by Agent Charlie Francis (Kirk Acevedo - Joe Toye of "Band of Brothers") and Astrid Farnsworth (Jasika Nicole). Helping them is the head "Employee" of Massive Dynamics, Nina Sharp (Altered State's Blair Brown).

Assembly Finished, now we have the main parts of FRINGE all ready to go. I never saw this Ep as it was Broadcast, I downloaded it much later. So as I view each Fringe Case in Order, I see an Enigmatic Story unfold which brings me to the edge of the known universe and beyond.

All of the aspects of this show are Feature Quality, but the show itself is not powered just by the strength of it's very well done CGI and practical effects, this is a content based series, each "case" is solidly based on some iota of real "Fringe" science - At least one aspect of each episode can be verified... Although in Fringe these things are stretched to their ultimate limits and then much further as possible to make the story that much better.

What attracted me to Fringe was of course John Noble whose "Denethor" in Lord of the Rings captured the essence of that character perfectly - And so, this show revolves around Walter Bishop.

This World Needs a Walter Bishop - I pray his real-world counterpart shows up soon!
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In an alternate IMDb universe...
A_Different_Drummer28 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
... where the rules are less strict and you can pen capsule reviews, I would simply write "early JJ Abrams" and that would be all you needed, millions of viewers from the present and possibly the future would "get" what that meant, and be able to decide whether or not to watch the show.

I can also tell you what this series is not. It is not a ripoff of X-Files since that show perfected a unique sort of narcissism which simply does not exist here. This is one of the most un-self-conscious productions in recent memory.

The closest analog is the original-original OUTER LIMITS, a show that specialized in gently but firmly leading the viewer deeper and deeper into the most outrageous scripts until you lost yourself in the story.

The Canuck sci-fi machine did a remake of OL in the 90s but nothing they did then, or could do now, comes close the production values that JJ incorporates into this stylish show.

So, to help newbies, imagine Outer Limits by way of Coppola and you'll a hint what this show is about.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fine opener marred by plot goofs and bloated runtime...
rixrex11 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
What was generally a fine pilot for another series that is akin to X-files, with small dashes of Twilight Zone, Outer Limits tossed in, had problems that kept it from being totally enjoyable. The large elephant in the room of course was the specter of X-Files, and this program's script would have failed any critical review for plagiarism. Muldar and Scully have been split into 3 characters here, but their basic components still exist. Muldar's intensity in Dunham, Scully's skepticism in Peter Bishop, Muldar's obsession and Scully's medical knowledge in Dr Bishop, Skinner is reincarnated as Charlie Francis, with all the same mystery of whose side he's on, Bionic Nina Sharp is the smoking man, and so on and so forth. Conspiracy fanatics will love it.

Other than retreading the same ground as X-Files, this episode was just too long at 90 mins (with commercials), and would have been much better as an hour-long pilot, but then that might have wrecked a DVD release of the pilot.

Plot contrivances occasionally came out of the left-field convenience pool of 'deus ex machina' and junk science. Of course there must be a suspension of belief for this type of material to work, but then does there also have to be absurdities that really have nothing to do with the science fiction? EG, After failing at several attempts to get Peter to help, Dunham threatens Peter with a 'file' of his bad activities if he doesn't help, but we all know that if such a file existed, it would be the first thing mentioned rather than the last. Turns out to be a bluff, but Peter is supposed to be a sharp minded person and would have seen the bluff coming.

Then we see that all it takes to get the infamous Dr. Bishop (aka Frankenstein) out of the mental hospital is for Peter to sign him out! What?! That's it?! That's just absurd, and besides, if the gov't wanted him out, they wouldn't need Peter. Also, we are supposed to believe that his laboratory was left untouched for 30 years, ha ha ha!

Then there's a fantastic plot device where Olivia can 'mind-meld' with her unconscious boyfriend that's pretty much just a contrivance to keep the plot going. Dr. Bishop comments that it's a procedure also good for up to 6 hrs after death. Then when the 'later discovered bad-guy' boyfriend is killed in a chase scene, nobody thinks to use the mind-meld procedure to find out who his superiors are? Even I was telling the TV: Hey, use the mind-meld! Of course the evil 'smoking man' character got the body and ordered use of the procedure at the anti-climactic end.

Well, I'll wait and see if anything smart and original comes out of this series, but I have doubts.
18 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It will all make sense, here some hints:
markus-21-5077256 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I must admit: I have watched all episodes before writing this, meaning: I am bias.

This first episode sets the tone for at least the first 3 season. Someone is trying to "show off" with a biochemical attack on a flight from Hamburg to Boston. To solve the case, and to save her lover John Scott, Olivia gets out of her way, and successfully recruits the key persons to save John. Her lover John turns against her, and (semi) dies later on. His last words to Olivia "ask why Broyles sent you to the storage unit" got stuck in my head for a long time. It could mean that Broyles wanted Olivia to be out of his hair during the investigation, or it could be that Broyles knew that John will be exposed to the chemicals, and wanted to test Olivia on how far she would go to save him.

Here is the facts: 1. The chemicals used on the plane were administrated by David Robert Jones 2. John Scott worked inside the FBI as an undercover NSA agent 3. Walter Bishop architected the biochemicals used on the flight (although he doesn't remember) 4. William Bell's plan is to start a war between Universes 5. Nina Sharp is loyal to William Bell 6. David Robert Jones plan is to "show off" his potential to his idol William Bell, who is a father figure to him - yet fired him from Massiv Dynamic years ago.

7. David Robert Jones is using the ZFT Manuscript written by Walter Bishop (Jones thinks it was written by William Bell) to impress Bell. The last chapters of ZFT containing "ethics and morals" have been removed, most likely by William Bell.

8. Jones goal is to one day work for his idol William Bell again

Those facts should help new watchers going trough season 1-3. At some point, there will be a new time line that will change quite a few items stated above, yet most protagonists will stay in character, and events will keep coming.

More spoilers: The last season will play in the future, where everything we learned up to then only has marginal meanings, except for the ethical standards of each character, and the reason there was an "Observer" interfering once in a while. Frankly, from the view of a scientist, the last season sucks. But the end of the show is outstanding, and it will all make sense.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Olivia's agent lover
gedikreverdi14 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
With the help of his son and Olivia, Dr. Bishop got out and reopened the lab in the basement to treat the agent who's also the secret lover of Olivia. Steig killed his twin along with other passengers on board with those chemicals hahah made their skin translucent. He got caught after John became translucent and Olivia wanted help from Bishop and he healed him but since he was working with Steig and Olivia learnt about it, John killed Steig at the hospital and got killed at a car accident while escaping and just before dying he warned her about their chief in charge. The woman in massive dynamics whose owner conducted experiments with Bishop in the past wanted John interrogates postmortem. The scene where Olivia and John shared dream and he showed him the face of Steig was really impressive.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not X files material but solid TV
nicofreezer14 May 2021
Many peoples like to compare Fringe to the X files, so i m gonna do it with the pilots. Pilot of X files is an all time Classic , here we have a pretty Solid episode but I Hope the quality will go up. Many Friends have recommende me Fringe and I love the first show of JJ Abrams, the Iconic Lost. So im looking forward to see what Fringe got in store.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could have been better
timebarrier10 October 2009
I have just watched the first episode yet, on recommendation by some friends.

But, as far as the pilot goes, there was nothing in it which would be able to hook someone to the series.

It is a sci-fi series, with an interesting concept. But, its flooded with cliché's and extremely poor acting by the cast. The emotions are barely present on the actor's faces. A large number of elements have been included in the pilot itself (like car chase, plane crash, mass destruction, hostility among colleagues, a born wasted genius, apart from the regular sci-fi stuff); maybe to make the pilot more interesting, but it does more harm than good as many elements are just superfluous. There has been some very poor attempts at anecdotes here and there, but their placement and (ir)relevance fails to generate any humor on the audience side.

Finally, everything is depicted as being impacting the whole world, resulting in its destruction and no one having a clue about what's been happening. While this may have sounded interesting even 2-3 years back, but with plenty of similar series and movies already out there, like Heroes and Resident Evil, there does not seem any creativity from the creators of the show.

I would be watching some of the other episodes, and I wish for the sake of the series, that they bring in more original stuff on the audience's plate, and develop the major concept of the series, rather than dwelling on the commonplace scenarios which have already bored the audience.
17 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
too much mumbo jumbo
JustHavingALook2 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
So: it's Sci fi, ok ok. But: we have: mysterious disease that kills everyone on a plane in a few minutes, melting their bodies said plane is the first one to have autopilot to land itself successfully FBI agents find a bio lab in a storage facility, one of them explodes, doesnt die (but he's in a rough shape) mad scientist gets out of a mental facility after 17 years and still knows how to operate his lab that still functions after being closed down for those 17 years (at Harvard) mad scientist gets a cow in that lab FBI agent goes into a deprivation tank where she can telepathically communicate with the other FBI agent twin brothers are involved artificial limb (arm and hand) indistinguishable from a normal one

now: the idea to have a new XFiles with more technologically advanced stuff is a bold one, I have to admit. But this pilot is a big mess. Too much to digest and accept. Stiff acting. Illogical developments

anyway: I guess they are right since they have 100 episodes under their belt.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
amazing pilot
nicolaiklemmetsen14 June 2023
First I want to say that I didn't really know what to expect with this show, I heard it was good but not anything more than that. So leading up I didn't know what to think. I am happy to report this pilot delivered on so many level's. The plot is interesting, the characters are likable and have a great onscreen dynamic. The acting is good, the symbolism of the apples makes this episode have so much more depth. The plot twist leading up to the ending was great. I think this is an amazing pilot, its not a top 10 or even top 20 pilot but its very good. Can this show keep it up with the orther episodes? I guess I will find out. This is a pretty short review and the reason being is because its late at night.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Full with stereotypes and plot goofs = disappointing pilot
I suspected this to be like a TV movie because of its overlong runningtime, but director Alex Graves managed to make this look like a longsome introduction to the characters and I thought that was good. I also really enjoy the whole look of the show, that is to say cinematography, score, editing or the way they show the locations of the particular scenes. This and the mystery style of the show are enough to keep me watching it, at least for the 1st season. We'll see if it gets better or worse (both is possible). So, I think the 3 leads are quite interesting and I'm curious how John Noble did not get a nomination for an Emmy as Best Supporting Actor in a Drama Series. I also enjoyed the beginning of this pilot very much and I had great interest in where the story would go. But after watching the whole thing, I think this show (or at least the pilot) is overrated. There were really a lot of goofs in the storyline and J. J. Abrams has never proved better that he adores to fill something that would otherwise be quite good with stereotypes. I mean, the love story? It seemed fake as hell and was totally unnecessary to the storyline. Furthermore, I really wanted to believe the supernatural parts of this, but it was just impossible regarding the illogicality and stupidity of some scenes. Despite all my criticism, I've got to give this pilot its due for entertaining me for the whole running time - I actually think it passed quickly. The mix of action, crime, sci-fi, mystery and drama (yes, it really are that much genres in one) worked rather good, but overall it just doesn't fulfil its premise. The writers focused on the false stuff because even with this long run-time, I still didn't really get to know the villains and the way they've done it. Usually I wouldn't rate an episode to which I've got that much to criticize about that good, but I like the style of the show very much and I'm just hoping that this was nothing more than a false start.
11 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fringe - amazing show still today
sini-2007 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I am on my Fringe rewatch, and watching the Pilot after so many years is reminding of me about this amazing show. Anna Torv does remarkable performance as work-driven, confident FBI agent Olivia Dunham. John Noble and Joshua Jackson are the unstable father-son duo. John Noble does brilliant acting as the lunatic/one of a kind scientist doctor. Lance Redsick is an interesting charcater with mysterious ways to him. The premise is reminding very much of X-Files, and it works. It's not a total copy of it but makes original plot of its own. It keeps you interested and wanting to learn more. I am looking forward rewatching this show.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Refreshingly Imaginative!
celticwarrior-4762714 December 2023
Just watched the pilot. First, I've always been a fan of j.j.abrams. Brilliant director to start with and now ...., an imaginative writer. The cast selection, for whatever reasons..... brilliant! So, I ask you, what happened to this series in 2008? Fifteen years later it's on HBO/MAX and I never heard of it until today?! What a hidden gem! Wait! Ok, I might be a little premature here. After all I've only watched the pilot and first five minutes of episode 1, though informative. Ok, how am I going do this? Comment still has 77 words to qualify but I haven't watched more to critique it properly. Oohh I have reached the magic number. So l'll leave you now with my thoughts on the PILOT to watch a couple of the episodes. Then give you the review on them. 5hsnk you for your patience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
We Must Accept It or Watch Something Else
Hitchcoc21 October 2023
A skeptical person may have trouble continuing after this incredible pilot. If one sees it as so far fetched (especially the re-animation aspect), it would be easy to dismiss it as too much. Of course, it's based on the horrors of the technology driven state with it's secret research and disregard for the common good. The big boys are evil and they have all the toys. When one of the FBI guys says they are obsolete, he hits the nail squarely on the head. But I choose to put this squarely in the realm of futuristic possibility and so choose to continue. The production value for this first episode is terrific. Characters have been put out there and we have a clear understanding of the forces at work. The science is acceptable because they say it it. I had never heard of our heroine until I watched Secret City. A reviewer made reference to how intense and well written this show was, so I took a chance. Should be fun.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Creepy, but in a Good Sort of Way
Cardrak11 April 2012
I don't watch many shows like this, but my sister recommended it. I do like the paranormal a bit. This, however, is a bit too much on the horror side for me.

I love the use of John Noble as Walter Bishop. I can see him developing in this role. The female protagonist is OK. I don't like Peter Bishop, and I don't know if that's the actor or the role he plays.

Why is the woman called "honey" and "sweetheart" so often? Do men still do that when they mean to be insulting? I thought that was maybe over.

I usually give myself another episode or two to decide about watching a series, but this may be the first and last one I watch. I would recommend it to those who like cop shows, paranormal, and horror. All together.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchable firs episode
turqouz16 December 2023
Full of bs in plot full of holes, but everything silly is explained that needs no explanation. The show treats the viewers like idiots. I like the actors but the lines are so terrible at times that there is nothing the actors could do to deliver them better. The show offends the viewer with mind-blowingly stupid stuff. Joshua's character building is terrible. He says so many bad lines. Only watching it because it has high ratings and there is some intrigue to the story for now. Not sure how the show got so many good reviews. Will watch another episode to see if it improves. The show is pretty unwatchable.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the jumping off point for what could be a decent but formulaic series
citizenchris22 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Fringe (season1-episode 1: pilot) 9-10-08

Here we have the jumping off point for what could be a decent but formulaic series. Whats the formula? Wacky stuff happens then a team of people willing to accept the fantastic as a possibility arrive to save the day....its been done before to be sure. Though I'll save my judgments for the season as a hole for a later date...lets talk about this episode. Words like slick come to mind...well paced, kinetic. Anna Torv is cute and gives a decent performance, Joshua Jackson seems to be here only to suply quips on how crazy the titular fringe science is even though we all know its going to end up working. John Noble's performance has to be the stand out...he does a wonderful job. And how can you not love Lance Reddick...seriously. If its the purpose of the pilot to hook you or at the very least get you to come back next week...then this episode certainly did that though certain rough spots will need to be ironed out.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I'm not sure how I feel about this!
mdking-492444 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I've had the complete Fringe blu ray box set sitting unopened on a shelf for 5 years and finally decided to give the pilot a watch and I'm not entirely sure how I feel about it, which is unusual because most things for me are pretty cut and dry. I liked the story and what I think will be the premise of the show and I liked the actors and most of their characters but there was something not quite right that I couldn't put my finger on until I read another review on IMDb. Some of the plot points are so utterly ludicrous that it made what could have been an excellent pilot episode in to a mediocre one at best. And (spoiler alert), "killing" the character they spent the whole episode trying to save at the end of the episode made it all seem completely pointless. It all seemed a bit rushed and forced. I will carry on with the next few episodes and see if it gets better but at this rate I be can't see me managing all 100 episodes, but maybe time will tell!
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Insultingly ridiculous
skay_baltimore25 June 2022
I don't know where to begin, because there are simply too many examples of utter absurdity in this pilot to EVEN begin. Given the number of "geniuses" included in the episode it's sad to describe just how dumb it was. Meh. This was 1:22:01 of my life I'll never get back.
4 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed