The Devil Next Door (TV Mini Series 2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
108 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Are all the bad reviews the same guy?
domotime210 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Ummm people aren't stupid. No one thinks Poland was responsible for the death camps. They were just showing a modern geographical representation of where the camps were located.

Great documentary that doesn't give away an agenda or show its hand. The best documentaries are the ones where you dont know what side to take until the end.

My only question about the entire case is... where was dumonyuk during the war. Simply if you're not ivan, where were you from 1937-1945. Such a simple question. He states he was a POW, so I guess that means be was fighting for the russian army or he was taken hostage or.
75 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
When The Spectacle Becomes More Sacred Than The Truth
genghis_khan2 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The documentary centers around an American citizen of Ukranian origin, John Demjanjuk, who, 40 years after the end of WWII, gets accused of being the notorious war criminal Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka. His American citizenship is revoked and he is sent to Israel to stand trial.

The real star of the documentary is J. Demjanjuk's Israeli defense attorney Yoram Sheftel. What a character he is. Maybe he is not a saint, how can he be, he is a lawyer but what an amazing personality. The trial is a national event in Israel, everyone seems already convinced that J. Demjanjuk is Ivan the Terrible even before the trial starts and emotions are running high. In that atmosphere, Yoram Sheftel decides he will expose what he calls "a show trial" for what it is and agrees to assist Demjanjuk's defense attorney Mark O'Connor in the case. One can claim he did it for fame or for money but you need to understand the risk this guy took, in order to appreciate his courage at least.

The documents that incriminate J. Demjanjuk are brought from the Soviets. This is of course the Cold War era and an ex-American citizen being tried in Israel with proof from the Soviet Union is very interesting by itself. Just as he is accused with Soviet documents initially, Demjanjuk is eventually acquitted because of other Soviet documents obtained after the dissolution of the USSR. But there are also the Holocaust survivors who positively identify Demjanjuk as Ivan the Terrible. This is where it gets really sensitive for Israelis. Acquitting Demjanjuk was equal to telling these people that their word was not good enough. Were they liars, was their memory failing them after so many years or were they just being led by the high emotions inside and around them? It is revealed in the documentary that one of the survivors already lied in his testimony just after the war when he said that they had killed Ivan the Terrible during an uprising. This is defended by the notion that "he wanted it to be true" or that "he wanted to be the hero". Why is it so preposterous or inconsiderate to think he would do it a second time for those same reasons then? Israel has some of the brightest, most educated minds in the world; people who won't just give in to populism. In the end, Supreme Court of Israel, based on the evidence presented to them, finds J. Demjanjuk innocent and acquits him.

American OSI isn't done with him though. Since they can't prove that he is Ivan the Terrible, they decide to get him to stand trial for being a prison guard in one of the death camps. So they fly him to Germany this time. I am just going to say this about that. If American officials wanted to make an example out of war criminals, then maybe they shouldn't have started from the bottom of the pile. You make a big spectacle out of an allegedly ordinary prison guard while high ranking Nazi party members like Wernher Von Braun are hailed as national heroes in your country. It is just absurd and believe me it is not sending out the right message or maybe any message at all.

John Demjanjuk technically died innocent because the legal procedure in Germany was not yet finalized. By the end of the documentary, I was mostly convinced that he had served as a guard in one of the death camps but not sure if he was the person they said he was. I think the courtroom sketch artist summarized Demjanjuk best when she said he was a survivor. He probably did what he had to do in order to survive, to go on living; nothing more, nothing less. You can still blame him for being a collaborator but wasn't almost everyone? Didn't Jews have to collaborate too? Almost everyone played the role Nazis gave them, some with more enthusiasm than others of course. Nazis created a horrifying machinery that stripped humans of all their humanity and reduced them to primal beasts doing unspeakable things in order to survive. They truly took from their victims everything.
70 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Glad I didn't see any reviews before watching
stevenjohnhaynes30 November 2019
I found this highly thought provoking. I didn't know the story beforehand and the directions it takes are remarkable. It doesn't hold back visually and is upsetting at times. I appreciate people have issues with historical mapping and association, however the national identities involved didn't occur to me. If viewed from a simple human perspective you'll find it eye-opening and it will leave you aghast with moral quandary. Highly recommended.
46 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's not about the map...
greengrl-8059720 November 2019
For those giving this doc a low rating based on their view that it is historically inaccurate...your review is inaccurate and you've missed the whole point. No where in this doc do they accuse the Polish of erecting and running the German built concentration camps on Polish soil. Further, that is not what this is about is it? It's about bringing an accused mass murderer to justice. I for one am perplexed by all the negativity.
134 out of 161 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't read the bad reviews
Jyjyc3323 December 2019
This documentary was excellent. I understand why people are angry that the map showed Poland as having death camps but I believe they did that to show us a modern perspective of where this was going on...not that Poland ran the camps or is responsible. To rate this show a 1 out of 10 is just ridiculous!
67 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting narrative and harmful bias
apkmedia10 November 2019
When will I stop reading and watching that something happened "In Poland". Did Polish people set up the camps or what? And why are the camps marked on the territory of present Poland that did not exist back then? Nazi Germany were not there or what? And I sympathize with those who lost some family members during Holocaust but even them write "In Poland". Like Nazi Germany either did not exist or were a neighbour state.
55 out of 132 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Accurate History
Sonofamoviegeek19 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Please ignore the multiple one-line reviews that are attempting to downgrade the ratings of this wonderful documentary. These holocaust deniers are attempting to whitewash the fact that Treblinka and Sobibor were well within the borders of pre-war Poland. In fact, they are still in Post-war Poland close to the borders of Belarus and Ukraine. Will these deniers next claim that Oswiecim (Auschwitz) lies in some country other than Poland? Full marks to the makers of the documentary for historical accuracy. At no point in the movie was Polish collaboration mentioned, likely because the slaughter of Jews in Jadwabne is irrelevant to the story being told in The Devil Next Door.

That story is about the role of Ukrainian collaborators at Treblinka and Sobibor and one collaborator in particular, John Demjanjuk. The movie, through archival footage and present day interviews with the family, attorneys, judges and survivors, puts forward a balanced picture of the evidence for and against the accusation that John Demjanjuk was or was not the notorious gas chamber operator Ivan the Terrible. The Supreme Court in Israel ultimately came to the right conclusion, that the evidence was not conclusive enough to convict Demjanjuk of the particular crime he was accused of. The German court also came to the right conclusion, that John Demjanjuk was a Nazi collaborator during the war.

The evidence unfolds in such a dramatic and balanced manner that the viewer's head will spin and bounce between convict and acquit conclusions. That's the problem with real life - There are no simple answers to real problems. I recommend this movie to anyone who is under the illusion that there are.
88 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great documentary
Calicodreamin20 March 2020
A really interesting documentary covering the deportation and trial of a man suspected of being nazi death camp gas chamber Ivan the terrible. The doc itself did a good job of presenting both sides of the trial and following through with the story. The story is captivating and the depth of the details isn't too overwhelming but still comprehensive.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Evil (?)
kosmasp9 March 2020
Who's evil and how can we tell? Also does age make a difference? Should you be forgiving to someone who was evil when he was younger because he is frail and old now? There are a lot of questions here, mostly moral ones. But there is also the Question of authenticity or rather of identity.

Charging someone with a heavy accusation like that is not something to take lightly. You have to be very certain ... asking the neighbors is not really helping. We know that in a lot of cases evil man have been good citizens. You would not suspect them to have done vile things.

The documentary is very thorough and still might leave people wanting/yearning for more (clarity). Then again, life is not always clear. It's as simple as that, if you can accept that and take this for what it is, you will be glued to the screen and not really disappointed by what happens or doesn't happen ... True story
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very interesting to watch, too bad it gets pulled dow by short sided people
rstySp00n5 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This should really have a higher score, but gets pulled down by 1 or 2 sentence reviews of people who are nagging about the "Polish" concentration camp references in the documentary.. Everybody knows that Germany occupied Poland and that it was their camps, not the Polish, but for some reason some trolls have a problem with that.

It's very interesting but also a bit scary, the OSI has information that could help him, but keeps it for itself and later states that "They didn't ask for it" that's really messed up. On the other hand am I pretty convinced that he was indeed working as a campguard somewhere there but not that he was the "Ivan". Also the Israeli lawyer, he was perfectly right to say it was a media circus and that John didn't got a fair trial, the Jewish people wanted revenge not justice (can't blame them). But still it's very chilling to see that John kept in his "role" till the end, without any emotion and those dead and empty eyes of him.

Very interesting to watch.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Most of the Death Camps WERE IN POLAND
Galroot22 November 2019
What are people getting all crazy about ? It was a good documentary, very interesting.
53 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I know...
agatastepniowska29 January 2020
I know some of you are like "thats an excelent doc, I dont know why polish people are so upset about some mistakes", but i have been in USA this year and i was working with jewish people and most of them still think that concentration camps were built by polish people and we killed them. I doubt that anyone would like to hear such horrifying accusations.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very confusing.
jbhobbs-137125 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The level of bias that the viewer is seemingly supposed to side with based on the emotions of people rather than the evidence portrayed is startling.

I've seen a lot of these kinds of talking heads in documentaries and it gets the same reaction from me every time - the more you try to pluck my heartstrings rather than show me your evidence, the more I'm going to take the side of the opposition.

The OSI seems to employ the same levels of brutishness and outright arrogance as the Anti-Deformation League. "All the evidence points to this!" Okay well show us then.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I enjoyed it
johasse18 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Ok, so, there are geographical errors BUT...anybody with half a brain knows that Germany invaded Poland and it became an occupied territory. I've always been very interested in history and I know more than the average person probably does. That being said, I never once thought to myself that Poland and the Polish people were running these extermination camps while I watched this documentary. The German nazis created and operated these camps while they OCCUPIED Poland.

I found this show to be very interesting and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I do, however, wish it was longer than 5 episodes. I think there was a missed opportunity to tell more of the story. Everything seemed to move too quickly and I found myself wanting to know more before the series concluded.

I don't think this was a case of mistaken identity. I believe the accusations were correct and he was lying about it. The nazis went to great lengths to cover up what they had done and that includes all who were involved attempting to assume new identities and escape to avoid punishment and certain death. A lot of them were caught and justice was served but a lot of them also escaped and took their secrets to their graves.
28 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A fascinating documentary.
Sleepin_Dragon20 February 2021
John Demjanjuk, a Ukrainian born, nationalised American is sent to Israel, facing charges of being Ivan The Terrible.

It's a fascinating series, it is very thought provoking, it's harrowing throughout, you will see some heart breaking scenes, and here some devastating accounts.

You may have to interpret some of the events yourself, and draw your own conclusions, nothing is really proven. The real issue is that the trial comes over forty years free the crimes, so there was always a degree of uncertainty as to Demjanjuk's real identity.

Demjanjuk's flippant attitude in court, really did get to me, he'd have been aware of the situation, the sensitivity, he behaved appallingly.

Once again, we see how damaging false evidence, and how attempts to pervert natural justice can damage a case irreparably.

Very interesting, I know how I felt about him. 8/10.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth Watching
lazygafiltafish12 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
First I have to laugh and a few posters who deliberately have given this low reviews due to them calling Israel, Israel in 1947. You might as well do the same thing to all WWI books and movies since the war was (pre WWII) called The Great War. Leave your political reviews aside when reviewing movies. I'm sick of there being Pro Palestine agendas anytime something has to do with Israel or a Jewish person.

Anyway I thought this was a well worth documentary. I heard of similar cases like this, but not this particular case. The reason I gave it 7 stars is because at times it was slow, and at other times they should have explored things that they briefly discussed such as the background of John Demjanjuk's first lawyer.

With each episode I had to keep thinking about what I would do if I had a role in finding him guilty or not guilty. Do you find him guilty due to your gut telling you that this guy was a murderer due to how he behaved when caught (you can see how he got some joy in this....his creepy smile, laughs, and trying to extend a handshake to a survivor who rightfully so was upset), due to some credible witnesses, his own admittance of where he was located based on his immigration records with what he self reported, as well as him admitting he had the SS blood type tattoo, or do you find him not guilty due to there being doubt that his ID was real or forged, as well as to some of the witnesses not being credible due to things like being senile? While it's a completely different event, reminds me of the OJ Trials where we know he did it, but there was doubt so due to laws, you had to find him not guilty.
11 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's a very tense and confusing case!
Irishchatter4 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Today this series was recommended on Netflix and I watched this with my family. Its honestly a confusing case to say the least. Its very uncertain if that John fella was the actual "Ivan The Terrible" or just some other third party who was involved with the Nazis somewhat. I mean the prosecutor's really made a balls of this case entirely! The more I watched the documentary, the more frustrated I become to get at least a proper answer if that man truly did kill innocent Jewish people during the war. Unfortunately it was too little too late when John died with no conclusion resolved.

This documentary was very well done like honestly, it makes you truly wonder what kind of evil is lurking in our world?!?!
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I dunno
trudiecarr11 March 2020
Honestly it was a really good watch however it isn't set out as clear as it should be and left me confused at some points
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Draws a clear distinction between justice and crucification ..
samabc-319525 August 2021
There is a statute of limitations on murder not on mass murders" Was he a victim of a mistaken identity or a monster?

Was he the Ivan the Terrible at Trebinka, Poland where 850,000 Jews were murdered or he was as he said just John Damjanjuk, an immigrant? Did he torture Jewish women and children,, pushed them into the gas chamber or was he just a Ford employee, a good American citizen who loved fixing kids bicycles ...He was extradited to Israel in 1984-85 by US against a wish of few like senator Pat Buchanan .. but who would defend him? In Jewish land ? This documentary does not leave any questions unanswered, it succeeds to draw a clear distinction between justice and the crucifixion.. one can clearly give a verdict after watching this.. 1.7 m Jews were annihilated in Poland... interesting fact that I learnt from this documentary is that Wernher von Braun, celebrated American hero and also, known as a Father of NASA (brain behind Moon missions) was an SS officer, a war criminal. He invented rockets during WWII to attack on UK.. But his accomplishments drew a veil over his wartime crimes!! A MUST watch.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well, I found it interesting. Not spectacular, but interesting
GreyHunter13 November 2019
With a certain amount of ambiguity, or at least enough to keep the documentary moving, this exploration of one of the last echoes of WW2 acts almost as an epilogue despite covering the WW2 era itself as part of the main story. As to the full extent of the truth about the alleged Ivan, well, it's never likely to be settled to the extent that non-biased viewers on either side of the debate will agree with each other. And, really, laying down the known facts and exploring what can be argued in the various lines of speculation is what most documentaries ought to be doing. There seemed to be certain presumptions of guilt here, but that's the nature of the beast.

I do find it amusing how many user reviews have one or two reviews to their accounts and generally parrot the same basic decidedly minor complaints about cartographical complaints as reasons for 1/10 ratings because their feelings were hurt by a brief couple of minutes in 200+ minutes aired. Seems likely these people mostly got their information from friends and raced here to post terrible reviews without watching. The problem with map labeling, of all things, is so minor that these reviews cannot be trusted. Hating Israel or pretending that people in the region of present-day Poland had no involvement isn't a good reason to get angry at a documentary about a criminal war crimes trial.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fascinating exploration of the legal fate of Ukrainian-Nazi prison camp guard later turned US citizen
Turfseer30 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This three hour and 49 minute documentary series is a fascinating chronicle of Jon Demjanjuk, the Ukrainian Nazi extermination camp guard who later came to the US, became a naturalized US citizen and then was deported to Israel where he was convicted (and later acquitted) of being the notorious Ivan the Terrible at the Treblinka extermination camp--only later to be deported to Germany where he stood trial for other crimes as a guard at another extermination camp.

The directors, Yossi Bloch and Daniel Sivan, manage to present both sides--which include Demjanjuk's family, his defense team along with the prosecutors -- in a balanced fashion. The central question the film attempts to answer: was Demjanjuk the notorious Treblinka guard, Ivan the Terrible.

The directors culled an extraordinary amount of TV footage from the original Israeli trial beginning in 1986. In it, Demjanjuk maintains that he was taken prisoner by the Germans after being conscripted into the Soviet Army and remained a prisoner until the end of the war. Substantial evidence proved that Demjanjuk was lying about his experience during the war. The main piece of evidence against him was an ID card with Demjanjuk's picture on it, listing his status at the Trawniki concentration camp in occupied Poland, a part training camp run by the SS who mainly trained Ukrainian prisoners of war who volunteered for duty as extermination camp guards.

Demjanjuk's team never contested that the picture on the ID card was not of him but maintained it was placed on the ID card which was a KGB forgery. It was rather convenient for the defense to argue that this document was a forgery simply because it came from an unreliable source (i.e. The KGB); but when new evidence emerged from KGB archives following the fall of the Soviet Union, they were quick to use that new evidence, to exonerate their client.

The directors could have done a bit of a better job presenting the mountain of evidence substantiating why the Trawniki ID card was legitimate. The ID card established that Demjanjuk was transferred to the Sobibor extermination camp and other camps after that. While on the stand however, Demjanjuk denied ever being a guard at Sobibor or Treblinka or any other camps. He was cross-examined as to why the ID card principally showed he was at Sobibor, along with earlier statements he made to American immigration investigators that he had been at Sobibor as well as naming a few obscure towns located near Treblinka.

Demjanjuk's family members (including his son-in-law Edward Nishnic) as well as residents of the Cleveland suburb where he came from, are steadfast in their belief that there was no way that a law-abiding, (in their eyes) docile man could have been the notorious Ivan the Terrible. Their convictions really mean little in light of someone like the notorious BTK killer, an American serial killer, who for many years was a well-respected church council president and Cub Scout leader.

Demjanjuk's comes off as arrogant especially when he boasts during the first trial that he's a "hero." Much more damning however is how surveillance footage taken before his deportation to Germany proved that he was faking being a cripple and needing to be in a wheelchair.

Just as those who knew Demjanjuk could not believe he could be guilty, neither did the judges in the first trial ever doubt the Treblinka victims' testimony absolutely identifying Demjanjuk as Ivan the Terrible. Two of the surviving judges to this day still are convinced of his guilt not only as the Sobibor camp guard but also as the notorious Ivan.

Perhaps the most fascinating character in the film is the Israeli Defense Attorney, Yoran Sheftel, who comes off as both hero and rogue. Committed to the idea that all defendants are entitled to a credible defense, it's through his persistence that Demjanjuk's appeal to the Israeli Supreme Court was successful. Sheftel almost was blinded by a fellow Israeli who regarded him as a traitor to Israel, defending the monstrous Ivan.

Nonetheless, Sheftel's arguments in defense of Demjanjuk only last as to the accusations against him as Ivan the Terrible. He really has no answer to other hard evidence placing Demanjuk at Sobibor and other death camps.

It wasn't until studying this case in further detail that I concluded that Demjanjuk was almost certainly NOT Ivan the Terrible. Nonetheless, given his subsequent deportation to Germany--approximately 20 years after the Israeli Supreme Court's decision--and having been found guilty as an accessory to murder by the German Court, one could argue that Demjanjuk got his just desserts. Because Demjanjuk died while the case was being appealed, technically his conviction was thrown out in Germany. Perhaps this is some consolation to Demjanjuk's family, but in the eyes of the public, he was clearly guilty, at least as having been a guard at more than one Nazi extermination camp.

The Devil Next Door is like a murder mystery with many twists and turns. If you love history, this is a series you should see as soon as possible.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lost In Translation?
laurenchood10 December 2019
It seems as though non-English speaking Europeans all report misinformation in this documentary which leads me to believe (or at least think) that perhaps there has been something lost in translation?

Language is fluid across cultures and countries and is not always approached delicately/accurately with translators dubbing movies unfortunately. The word may have the same literal translation, but not the meaning- and vice verse.

Ex: Prego, Italian for "you're welcome" literally translates to "it's nothing." But waiters escorting you to you table at a restaurant will say "prego" to gesture as if saying "after you."

Ex: A growler in the USA is NOT the same in Australia.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good show but need to exercise caution
Lovegood138 March 2022
While watching this show, just remember who wrote, directed, and produced it. Every story leaks the belief/perspective of its makers, so it's always important to keep the background of the makers of a show while watching.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Starts Out as a Competent Documentary, Jumps the Tracks in the Final Episode
chas43710 November 2019
I followed the Denjanjuk ordeal in the 80s and 90s. It was one of the most fascinating stories of my lifetime. This documentary is well done through the initial episodes.

The problem starts in the final episode. The filmmakers are ignorant of the history of post-Nazi Europe. Not every person affiliated with the Nazi Party was a believer in genocide. There was powerful coercion for prominent Germans to join the party. Their families were threatened. The were sent to camps.

Germany lost the war. It doesn't mean that every German who supported the war effort was a war criminal. If so, there would have been 10s of millions in prison. It was a very dark time for humanity, The Nazis committed countless atrocities but so did the Soviets. We don't know what people like John Denjanjuk experiences during WW2. Ukraine was ravaged by Stalin AND Hitler. Most of these people just wanted to live out their lives in peace. The anecdotes from Denjanjuk's coworker were speculative and not very credible.

The filmmakers needed to be more careful about believing the KGB about anything. The KGB was involved is all sorts of evil in the decades after the war. The Israeli Supreme Court seemed to understand this more than the filmmaker did. As far as I'm concerned, the Soviets and the Nazis were BOTH pure evil. They forced people to do unmentionable things to their fellow man. Do research on Stalin's purges and starvation of over a million Ukrainians during the 1930s.

This is the sort of propaganda that pervades Netflix these days. It needs to be called out.
77 out of 171 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must see
oypy-8112919 November 2019
So well done, brings you back into those times , I remember it watching from USSR. Sad reality, must see for those denying Jew extermination by Nazi. Left me with even more questions...
30 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed