It's not highly likely to win many new converts, but for those who already like the original and want to see more of that world, it more than satisfies. The visuals are a wonderful evolution from Tron and the story of a father and son who have to make up for lost time is very touching. The CGI face they developed for Jeff Bridges is not perfect, but it works very well with just a few exceptions and I feel, for my own tastes, that they have actually bridged the uncanny valley with this one. Still a bit of work to get it perfect, but this one works as it is. Oh, and the score by Daft Punk is beautiful. The first thing my brother and I did after leaving the theater was buy the sound track on the way home. It's very suggestive of the original but with plenty of today's newer sensibilities mixed in.
632 Reviews
Love this movie and it's soundtrack
jtooley-7784029 October 2019
Great great movie always get chills from the music and when he first uses the bike. Love the atmosphere of Sam Flynn's life and how much love he has for his father at the end of the movie. Fantastic message in the movie where we as people think things are important in our life such as work or possessions but nothing is more important then family 👍.
A spectacular visual experience to be taken with a pinch of salt!
alwaysbwithu5 December 2010
Kevin Flynn (Bridges) is the CEO of Encom and the world's best video game developer. One night he simply vanishes without a trace and leaves his company in chaos and his young son. Fast-forward 20 years, Sam Flynn (Hedlund) is a rebellious 27 year old and a thorn in the side of Richard Mackey (Nordling), a suit trying to take over his father's company with the help of a software designer (an uncredited cameo from Cillian Murphy). Though Sam is the heir, he refuses to play an active role in the decision-making process. Alan Bradley (Boxleitner) meets him one night with the news that he has received a page from Kevin Flynn's arcade - a number that has been disconnected for 20 years. Thus ensues the inevitable investigation into his father's whereabouts and Sam's transportation into the world his father has created and been trapped in for decades.
Where to begin? Tron: Legacy is a visual feast for your eyes and an auditory pleasure thanks to Daft Punk and Joseph Trapanese. The soundtrack feels ethereal almost and fits perfectly with this new world we have been introduced to for the first time (or the 2nd time if you've seen the 1982 original).
3D, for me, is a recent scourge that has been infecting and affecting the movie industry. Yes, maybe it is a more lucrative avenue for the movie industry after the setback of heavy piracy but enough is enough! Joseph Kosinski, however, had a vision (and an architectural degree behind him) to give us a mouth-opening, simply beautiful world with the correct blend of 2D and 3D! It is quite simply worth it just to go for the visuals.
What the movie makes up for in spectacular imagery, it lacks in storyline. Maybe I should have watched the 1982 version as so many people have pointed out to me but even without it, the plot seems a little disjointed. The underlying connections to the real world are numerous such as The Holocaust, God complexes, evil doppelgangers and more. You are left with more questions than answers as it is never revealed just what it is about this world that would "change everything" in the real world.
Jeff Bridges is great as both the villain and hero and his computer animated self is simply amazing although at the same time off-putting (this might be the Uncanny Valley hypothesis at work). The acting overall is not anything to write home about (no Oscar winners here) but Hedlund as Sam Flynn holds his own against a more charismatic Jeff Bridges. Quorra (Wilde) provides a potential love interest and the key to changing our world and a doe-eyed innocent view of life that is endearing.
This is a movie that should be simply taken for what it is, a pandering to the original fan base whilst garnering new ones, one not to be over- analysed but simply to be marvelled at with a group of friends. The actions scenes are just jaw-dropping with light cycles (that I wish I owned!) and deadly Frisbees amongst other things. Disney took a risk to continue a series almost 3 decades later rather than going for the easy option of re-imagining it. A wise move.
Where to begin? Tron: Legacy is a visual feast for your eyes and an auditory pleasure thanks to Daft Punk and Joseph Trapanese. The soundtrack feels ethereal almost and fits perfectly with this new world we have been introduced to for the first time (or the 2nd time if you've seen the 1982 original).
3D, for me, is a recent scourge that has been infecting and affecting the movie industry. Yes, maybe it is a more lucrative avenue for the movie industry after the setback of heavy piracy but enough is enough! Joseph Kosinski, however, had a vision (and an architectural degree behind him) to give us a mouth-opening, simply beautiful world with the correct blend of 2D and 3D! It is quite simply worth it just to go for the visuals.
What the movie makes up for in spectacular imagery, it lacks in storyline. Maybe I should have watched the 1982 version as so many people have pointed out to me but even without it, the plot seems a little disjointed. The underlying connections to the real world are numerous such as The Holocaust, God complexes, evil doppelgangers and more. You are left with more questions than answers as it is never revealed just what it is about this world that would "change everything" in the real world.
Jeff Bridges is great as both the villain and hero and his computer animated self is simply amazing although at the same time off-putting (this might be the Uncanny Valley hypothesis at work). The acting overall is not anything to write home about (no Oscar winners here) but Hedlund as Sam Flynn holds his own against a more charismatic Jeff Bridges. Quorra (Wilde) provides a potential love interest and the key to changing our world and a doe-eyed innocent view of life that is endearing.
This is a movie that should be simply taken for what it is, a pandering to the original fan base whilst garnering new ones, one not to be over- analysed but simply to be marvelled at with a group of friends. The actions scenes are just jaw-dropping with light cycles (that I wish I owned!) and deadly Frisbees amongst other things. Disney took a risk to continue a series almost 3 decades later rather than going for the easy option of re-imagining it. A wise move.
Style over substance
briancham19943 June 2020
This film is the best example of "style over substance", but wow, what substance. It has some of the best production design and soundtrack I have ever witnessed. Visually and aurally speaking, I would even call it a masterpiece. It is like no other techno-futuristic cyberspace I have ever seen depicted. However, it is let down by a dull main actor and an unpolished story that didn't fully convince me.
An Underrated Gem
KingCritic29 October 2019
Everything about this film works. The visuals, writing, acting, everything. There are very few wrong things I can find with Tron, especially the soundtrack which is timeless even almost a decade later. I still remember watching this film in theaters and not regretting it at all. I highly recommend this film for fans of anything quality.
From the pacing to the cinematography this film is astoundingly well made, and truly deserves more recognition. It is timeless in every meaning of the word.
From the pacing to the cinematography this film is astoundingly well made, and truly deserves more recognition. It is timeless in every meaning of the word.
Surprisingly enjoyable
TheLittleSongbird11 May 2011
I actually wasn't expecting to enjoy TRON:Legacy, but coming from someone who is fond of the original 1982 film, I did. TRON:Legacy isn't a perfect movie though, then again neither was the original movie. The film thematically is deeper than the original, but there are some parts where it comes across as rather formulaic for my tastes. Also while the characters are likable, they aren't given that much depth, and again while the dialogue is intriguing at most some of it is weak and dare I say stilted.
That said, TRON:Legacy has a lot to redeem it. Jeff Bridges is great and Garett Hedlund is likable, but when it comes to the acting the film is stolen by a gleefully enjoyable Michael Sheen and a wonderfully edgy Olivia Wilde. The action sequences and chases are very exciting, and help keep the momentum of the pace and story going, and the soundtrack is just fantastic. But the real revelation is in the film's look. The film looks amazing and one of the most visually stylish films of the year- I just loved the cinematography and editing and the special effects and use of neons are outstanding.
In conclusion, a surprisingly enjoyable film that I wasn't expecting to like. 7/10 Bethany Cox
That said, TRON:Legacy has a lot to redeem it. Jeff Bridges is great and Garett Hedlund is likable, but when it comes to the acting the film is stolen by a gleefully enjoyable Michael Sheen and a wonderfully edgy Olivia Wilde. The action sequences and chases are very exciting, and help keep the momentum of the pace and story going, and the soundtrack is just fantastic. But the real revelation is in the film's look. The film looks amazing and one of the most visually stylish films of the year- I just loved the cinematography and editing and the special effects and use of neons are outstanding.
In conclusion, a surprisingly enjoyable film that I wasn't expecting to like. 7/10 Bethany Cox
A dazzling and spectacular special effects extravaganza, despite its flaws.
dvc515916 December 2010
Right off the bat I'm going to say that I didn't see the first film. Obviously I've heard from a lot of people saying that they need to see the first film before watching this one, seeing as this is a direct sequel to a nearly 30 year old cult sci-fi film. But, seeing that I didn't have time, I decided to watch the sequel anyway.
Now keep in mind that Disney took a HUGE risk in making a sequel to a movie that is not very often talked about when it comes to movies as opposed to many blockbusters today. The first TRON had no famous franchise to speak of (apart from the real games inspired by it). Adding to the danger is the film's budget - reportedly between US$ 200 - 300 million. With that kind of money you'll wonder what exactly was Disney hoping for with this film.
Nevermind the fact that the story is a bit unfocused and could be rounded up in a more polished way. Nevermind too that the fantastic world and great ideas aren't expanded upon some more, as well as the fact that the script could use a little bit more originality.
Also, not forgetting some good (in Jeff Bridges' case, great as always as he plays two very different characters with perfect emotional resonance - proving that he still has the chops to carry a big movie) performances by the cast - with Garrett Hedlund showing great leading man potential and Olivia Wilde looking great and cute to boot. Michael Sheen, Beau Garrett and Bruce Boxleitner (apparently returning to his role from the first film, so it seems) all give good support.
No sir-ee, what you pay for - and what you get in spades - are the special/visual effects. Goodness me, this is quite possibly the best special effects I've seen all year, and that's saying something. I have to admit though, the CGI that makes Jeff Bridges young look jarring, but that is overshadowed by the compelling, groundbreaking special/visual effects that really bring you into the cybernetic world. Who doesn't want to take a ride on one of those fantastic, futuristic vehicles? Who doesn't want those awesome light-cycles or one of those dueling/data discs? It is possible that, like "Avatar" a year ago, this film can be a game-changer for special/visual effects alone.
It's a real treat for the eyes, and it's even better in 3D which is splendidly used to flesh out the dimensions and graphics of the cyber world bring you even deeper into the world instead of things merely flying out to you and post-production conversion like in SO many 3D movies (Note that in the 3D version, there's a disclaimer before the film starts, saying that parts of the film are filmed in both natural 2D and 3D as they way they should be. Just so you know, this shows that the filmmakers care for what they want to give you).
Very ambitious architect-and-designer-turned-first-time-filmmaker Joseph Kosinski hit a home run with this film, crafting an extraordinary and spellbinding world of escapism that looks slick, stylish and extremely cool to watch. Kosinski and the production team fill the cyber world with heaps of imagination and the result is what you see on screen. And here I thought Hollywood would recycle certain design patterns (plot patterns still need work though). Kosinski is a truly visionary filmmaker that one really has to keep an eye on.
The production design is on par with the special effects, it is nothing short of spectacular and perfect. The cinematography which is big and wide and best of all NOT shaky allows you to savor every moment of SFX goodness. The superb sound effects serve to complement the visuals and the electronic world, and all for the better. Daft Punk's varying but atmospheric electronic/orchestral score all but suits the film's mood perfectly with its techno beats and soaring string during moments.
Overall, this is perhaps a fine way to end the blockbuster season of 2010, and this is a definite must watch for all looking for an escape. The special effects alone are worth the price of TWO movie tickets, and with that I say, give this one a try, even if you haven't seen the first one. It aims to entertain and to dazzle the audience, and it succeeds brilliantly. Excuse me while I rent the first one now.
Overall rating: 75/100
Now keep in mind that Disney took a HUGE risk in making a sequel to a movie that is not very often talked about when it comes to movies as opposed to many blockbusters today. The first TRON had no famous franchise to speak of (apart from the real games inspired by it). Adding to the danger is the film's budget - reportedly between US$ 200 - 300 million. With that kind of money you'll wonder what exactly was Disney hoping for with this film.
Nevermind the fact that the story is a bit unfocused and could be rounded up in a more polished way. Nevermind too that the fantastic world and great ideas aren't expanded upon some more, as well as the fact that the script could use a little bit more originality.
Also, not forgetting some good (in Jeff Bridges' case, great as always as he plays two very different characters with perfect emotional resonance - proving that he still has the chops to carry a big movie) performances by the cast - with Garrett Hedlund showing great leading man potential and Olivia Wilde looking great and cute to boot. Michael Sheen, Beau Garrett and Bruce Boxleitner (apparently returning to his role from the first film, so it seems) all give good support.
No sir-ee, what you pay for - and what you get in spades - are the special/visual effects. Goodness me, this is quite possibly the best special effects I've seen all year, and that's saying something. I have to admit though, the CGI that makes Jeff Bridges young look jarring, but that is overshadowed by the compelling, groundbreaking special/visual effects that really bring you into the cybernetic world. Who doesn't want to take a ride on one of those fantastic, futuristic vehicles? Who doesn't want those awesome light-cycles or one of those dueling/data discs? It is possible that, like "Avatar" a year ago, this film can be a game-changer for special/visual effects alone.
It's a real treat for the eyes, and it's even better in 3D which is splendidly used to flesh out the dimensions and graphics of the cyber world bring you even deeper into the world instead of things merely flying out to you and post-production conversion like in SO many 3D movies (Note that in the 3D version, there's a disclaimer before the film starts, saying that parts of the film are filmed in both natural 2D and 3D as they way they should be. Just so you know, this shows that the filmmakers care for what they want to give you).
Very ambitious architect-and-designer-turned-first-time-filmmaker Joseph Kosinski hit a home run with this film, crafting an extraordinary and spellbinding world of escapism that looks slick, stylish and extremely cool to watch. Kosinski and the production team fill the cyber world with heaps of imagination and the result is what you see on screen. And here I thought Hollywood would recycle certain design patterns (plot patterns still need work though). Kosinski is a truly visionary filmmaker that one really has to keep an eye on.
The production design is on par with the special effects, it is nothing short of spectacular and perfect. The cinematography which is big and wide and best of all NOT shaky allows you to savor every moment of SFX goodness. The superb sound effects serve to complement the visuals and the electronic world, and all for the better. Daft Punk's varying but atmospheric electronic/orchestral score all but suits the film's mood perfectly with its techno beats and soaring string during moments.
Overall, this is perhaps a fine way to end the blockbuster season of 2010, and this is a definite must watch for all looking for an escape. The special effects alone are worth the price of TWO movie tickets, and with that I say, give this one a try, even if you haven't seen the first one. It aims to entertain and to dazzle the audience, and it succeeds brilliantly. Excuse me while I rent the first one now.
Overall rating: 75/100
Not too user-friendly
largu17 December 2010
I like the first Tron. Not in an creepy over-obsessed way, but I regard it as a campy, retro glitterfest based on an delightfully silly idea. The basic concept stays the same in Tron Legacy. Computer programs are sentient beings inside the computer grid, probably deriving from the fact that they are created from someone's hope and dreams and therefore inherit some of their creators (or "users")soul.
In the first Tron a "user", Flynn/Jeff Bridges, is whisked away into the computer world (by lasers, no less). In "Legacy" the son of Flynn is looking for his father 20 years after he strangely disappeared without a trace. No price for guessing where, and we also find ourselves in the computer world after a quite glum and outstretched intro. FINALLY.
Turns out the world inside is equally glum. Now, with the way the use of computer have evolved and increased dramatically since the last movie I was expecting to see a grid teeming with all sorts of life and variety. That may be my mistake. I realize that the world in Tron Legacy may in fact be the sole creation of one being (Flynn/Jeff Bridges) with no interaction with the rest of the world, which may be plausible,given the theme of the movie, but still. Flynn copy/paste a lot and is obviously very fond of the "dark-gritty-stone-tool".
All that aside, there been notables upgrades in the Tron world. Most technology looks, well, cooler. It is stunning visually, especially in 3d. My biggest gripe with the movie though is how clunky everything is. This should be a rendition of the world inside a computer, but stuff hisses, creaks and spew exhaustion. When did the digital world turn so analogue? Sure, from a scientific point of view the digital is indistinguishable from the analogue if it is complex enough, but why does it feels like a step backwards? The world in the older movie actually feels like a much more accurate rendition of a computer world than this. The new one is more like reality with fancy neon. Flynn turns his personal abode into a reality shrine, and eating what I guess is a virtually crafted pig, but that is him emulating reality. The motor of the first movie was that we could see games and programs run "as if it was in real life". With todays graphics that is already happening on-screen so the movie might have outlived its gimmick. If so there are more than enough other features from the digital world worthy of being represented in Tron. Why just demote the whole world then?
I realise I haven't said anything about the acting. Well, there is none. Bridges tries his best to put some personality into Flynn. Not an easy task. Most of the time he just seems awkward. Our protagonist, whats-his-face, Sam is the sulky and estranged techno-wizz-kid we have all seen so many times before, only a bit older this time (27). The Tron from the title is there naturally, and he does... nothing. Boxlietner is in the cast, why not let him give old Tron a line at least? In the male world of computers there are as many as two female actor, but they are just the standard blockbuster version of the madonna/whore, aka spunky and bitchy. That boils down to sourpuss, hippie, spunky, bitchy, a creepy game-character and oh, there is also a Bowie, although not thee Bowie. Hello Disney, NEXT TIME YOU SHOULD CONSIDER ADDING SOME DIMENSIONS TO YOUR CHARACTERS, AND I DO NOT MEAN 3D, OK?
Frankly, I'm thoroughly annoyed, and though not expecting much also surprisingly disappointed. Ah, well. The 4/10 is for looks, sounds and effort. It do look nice and the soundtrack is marvellous at times. I'm convinced that the musicians Daft Punk would make a better version of Tron themselves AND with more heart.
In the first Tron a "user", Flynn/Jeff Bridges, is whisked away into the computer world (by lasers, no less). In "Legacy" the son of Flynn is looking for his father 20 years after he strangely disappeared without a trace. No price for guessing where, and we also find ourselves in the computer world after a quite glum and outstretched intro. FINALLY.
Turns out the world inside is equally glum. Now, with the way the use of computer have evolved and increased dramatically since the last movie I was expecting to see a grid teeming with all sorts of life and variety. That may be my mistake. I realize that the world in Tron Legacy may in fact be the sole creation of one being (Flynn/Jeff Bridges) with no interaction with the rest of the world, which may be plausible,given the theme of the movie, but still. Flynn copy/paste a lot and is obviously very fond of the "dark-gritty-stone-tool".
All that aside, there been notables upgrades in the Tron world. Most technology looks, well, cooler. It is stunning visually, especially in 3d. My biggest gripe with the movie though is how clunky everything is. This should be a rendition of the world inside a computer, but stuff hisses, creaks and spew exhaustion. When did the digital world turn so analogue? Sure, from a scientific point of view the digital is indistinguishable from the analogue if it is complex enough, but why does it feels like a step backwards? The world in the older movie actually feels like a much more accurate rendition of a computer world than this. The new one is more like reality with fancy neon. Flynn turns his personal abode into a reality shrine, and eating what I guess is a virtually crafted pig, but that is him emulating reality. The motor of the first movie was that we could see games and programs run "as if it was in real life". With todays graphics that is already happening on-screen so the movie might have outlived its gimmick. If so there are more than enough other features from the digital world worthy of being represented in Tron. Why just demote the whole world then?
I realise I haven't said anything about the acting. Well, there is none. Bridges tries his best to put some personality into Flynn. Not an easy task. Most of the time he just seems awkward. Our protagonist, whats-his-face, Sam is the sulky and estranged techno-wizz-kid we have all seen so many times before, only a bit older this time (27). The Tron from the title is there naturally, and he does... nothing. Boxlietner is in the cast, why not let him give old Tron a line at least? In the male world of computers there are as many as two female actor, but they are just the standard blockbuster version of the madonna/whore, aka spunky and bitchy. That boils down to sourpuss, hippie, spunky, bitchy, a creepy game-character and oh, there is also a Bowie, although not thee Bowie. Hello Disney, NEXT TIME YOU SHOULD CONSIDER ADDING SOME DIMENSIONS TO YOUR CHARACTERS, AND I DO NOT MEAN 3D, OK?
Frankly, I'm thoroughly annoyed, and though not expecting much also surprisingly disappointed. Ah, well. The 4/10 is for looks, sounds and effort. It do look nice and the soundtrack is marvellous at times. I'm convinced that the musicians Daft Punk would make a better version of Tron themselves AND with more heart.
Effects heavy style that works as such despite having a basic plot and nothing really in terms of characters
bob the moo1 May 2011
The sequel to Tron took the right approach to the marketing and went into effect a good year before the film came out. Recognising that many people (apart from real fans) will only have a hazy recollection of the film and will probably vaguely remember it as "good" but really only remember the iconic bikers and design of it all, the marketing focused on the updated design, bikes etc that make up this world. In every interview there was always a smattering of talk about father/son and comments made on the power and omnipresent nature of computers and networks but really it was the visual aspects of the film that were pushed to the front. So it was with the marketing, so it is with the film where we join the rebellious son of Flynn as he gets sucked into the grid and discovers that his father's dream has been corrupted by a clone programme of himself.
It is advisable to start with the world that has been created within this film because ultimately this is its main selling point. It looks great – faithful to the original creation but never feels dated by an old view of computing, it is a vibrant place and even some forced "places" (like a nightclub that makes it feel a little Cool World) don't hurt it beyond the bigger idea and feel. I saw it in 2D but the looming ships and bikes and such all worked well and looked great. The effects that produce a young Jeff Bridges are technically impressive and mostly they work well – it is only the very small movements of skin and face that don't convince but it is so good that, rather than "not working" it just looks like something is a little freaky with him. Although I'm not a massive Daft Punk fan, their soundtrack does work well and they fit the film well.
The film is mostly moved forward by this style and frequent action sequences; mostly this is enough and I did find it to be entertaining considering that I expected the 2 hour long film to drag once the novelty wore off after 15 minutes. The basic plot (get to the exit before the other guy does) is enough to provide room for action but not for characters. Occasionally we will get attempts at this and they kinda work just for that moment but not to make me care about the people/programmes. Hedlund is likeably athletic and that is what he brings to the role – not much in the way of performance but he fills the lead well enough. Bridges seems to be channelling the Dude for a reason I cannot totally understand and, although he is cool and effective in his roles, it isn't really a performance per se. Sheen hams it up in his brief moments while House's Wilde makes an appealing female programme even if she has nothing in terms of substance to offer.
Overall it is an effects film and in this regard it works very well, getting the style right in an engaging and slick manner that is all style. The substance is not really there to match it but if I'm being honest I didn't really miss it; mainly this was due to the style and action making up enough of the time and engaging me enough to not worry too much about not caring about anyone in the film. A hollow film then in many regards but it will be good looking enough to win over viewers despite this empty core.
It is advisable to start with the world that has been created within this film because ultimately this is its main selling point. It looks great – faithful to the original creation but never feels dated by an old view of computing, it is a vibrant place and even some forced "places" (like a nightclub that makes it feel a little Cool World) don't hurt it beyond the bigger idea and feel. I saw it in 2D but the looming ships and bikes and such all worked well and looked great. The effects that produce a young Jeff Bridges are technically impressive and mostly they work well – it is only the very small movements of skin and face that don't convince but it is so good that, rather than "not working" it just looks like something is a little freaky with him. Although I'm not a massive Daft Punk fan, their soundtrack does work well and they fit the film well.
The film is mostly moved forward by this style and frequent action sequences; mostly this is enough and I did find it to be entertaining considering that I expected the 2 hour long film to drag once the novelty wore off after 15 minutes. The basic plot (get to the exit before the other guy does) is enough to provide room for action but not for characters. Occasionally we will get attempts at this and they kinda work just for that moment but not to make me care about the people/programmes. Hedlund is likeably athletic and that is what he brings to the role – not much in the way of performance but he fills the lead well enough. Bridges seems to be channelling the Dude for a reason I cannot totally understand and, although he is cool and effective in his roles, it isn't really a performance per se. Sheen hams it up in his brief moments while House's Wilde makes an appealing female programme even if she has nothing in terms of substance to offer.
Overall it is an effects film and in this regard it works very well, getting the style right in an engaging and slick manner that is all style. The substance is not really there to match it but if I'm being honest I didn't really miss it; mainly this was due to the style and action making up enough of the time and engaging me enough to not worry too much about not caring about anyone in the film. A hollow film then in many regards but it will be good looking enough to win over viewers despite this empty core.
Tron what have you become?
EddyOne13 December 2010
Actually the headline of this review is an actual quote from TRON LEGACY, it's the only time I had to laugh in the movie, because it was exactly the same question I was asking myself.
After watching the movie I can at least answer this question: A heartless and confusing movie that lacks a good script and tries to compensate with state of the art special effects.
I can't complain about the visual effects. They're right on. But everything else isn't. And I'm not even a die hard Tron-Fan to begin with. It's not your usual "boohoo what have they done with one of my favorite movies" reviews. Although I expect Tron-Fans to be disappointed, as there is nothing of the old spirit left in this one.
No the movie seems like a commercial for the video game. You don't connect to the characters, you don't really understand or care about the story. It has in no way that oppressive feeling, that you felt with the original. Instead it's just a bunch of random action sequences following each other, lots of cgi and slow-motion (seriously, it's almost 2011, how many more slow-mo-projectile-evasion do we need? if scary movie made fun of it, don't do it in your movie and still expect it to be somewhat cool). there are like dozens of scenes that will remind you of other flicks, like "the fifth element", "matrix" or "star wars". but while copying styles and plots of other movies, TRON LEGACY fails to deliver something own, something unique. And that's basically the exact opposite of what TRON once was. Tron what have you become? Considering the costs of this movie you have to wonder: Tron what could you have become, if someone would have been able to pen a good script and give this flick it's missing soul?!
After watching the movie I can at least answer this question: A heartless and confusing movie that lacks a good script and tries to compensate with state of the art special effects.
I can't complain about the visual effects. They're right on. But everything else isn't. And I'm not even a die hard Tron-Fan to begin with. It's not your usual "boohoo what have they done with one of my favorite movies" reviews. Although I expect Tron-Fans to be disappointed, as there is nothing of the old spirit left in this one.
No the movie seems like a commercial for the video game. You don't connect to the characters, you don't really understand or care about the story. It has in no way that oppressive feeling, that you felt with the original. Instead it's just a bunch of random action sequences following each other, lots of cgi and slow-motion (seriously, it's almost 2011, how many more slow-mo-projectile-evasion do we need? if scary movie made fun of it, don't do it in your movie and still expect it to be somewhat cool). there are like dozens of scenes that will remind you of other flicks, like "the fifth element", "matrix" or "star wars". but while copying styles and plots of other movies, TRON LEGACY fails to deliver something own, something unique. And that's basically the exact opposite of what TRON once was. Tron what have you become? Considering the costs of this movie you have to wonder: Tron what could you have become, if someone would have been able to pen a good script and give this flick it's missing soul?!
I've been waiting 28 years for that....
DigitalWitch17 December 2010
And it was worth it.
I was 9 years old when I saw TRON in a dingy cinema in Fareham, I was hooked then, and I always dreamed they would make a sequel.
I was seriously worried though, I mean, Escape from New York was another of my favourite movies and I got all excited about the sequel to that... and left the cinema mortified...
Not this time.
This was like an old friend coming home.
There are a lot of comments about this movie having a poor story, personally, I disagree. It was a father and son story, any more on top of the other sub plots going on would have been too much.
It's a hell of an experience for the sences... when those Recognizers flew overhead the cinema shook... immersive, entertaining... everything a good movie should be.
Roll on Number 3.
I was 9 years old when I saw TRON in a dingy cinema in Fareham, I was hooked then, and I always dreamed they would make a sequel.
I was seriously worried though, I mean, Escape from New York was another of my favourite movies and I got all excited about the sequel to that... and left the cinema mortified...
Not this time.
This was like an old friend coming home.
There are a lot of comments about this movie having a poor story, personally, I disagree. It was a father and son story, any more on top of the other sub plots going on would have been too much.
It's a hell of an experience for the sences... when those Recognizers flew overhead the cinema shook... immersive, entertaining... everything a good movie should be.
Roll on Number 3.
Not the Legacy I was hoping to see
Malok18 December 2010
I was able to re-watch the original right before we left so it colored my perception heavily. Also, I wanted to love this movie very badly; it's a cherished childhood memory.
The movie had either too much, or too little depth. The original had very little depth but I thought it worked very well. I could have used more action and less exposition or just a better fleshed out story. This movie falls squarely in the middle. The character Sam fluctuates between bad-ass and inept seemingly at will. I wish we could have picked one and stuck with it throughout the film. Jeff Bridges seems very much like "The Dude" and nothing like K. Flynn. I had only a few moments where the character seemed to say something I would've expected Flynn to say. Was this the fault of the director, the script, Jeff Bridges or a combination? Personally, I very much disliked the character of Zeus; I thought he didn't fit the world in any way. The fate of Tron left a very bad taste in my mouth. Bruce was underused considering how integral to the original story he was. They should have departed from the original completely, or had more ties with the original. I felt as though the script needed a bit more work before they filmed it. Was this pushed out by Disney instead of taking enough time to polish it? I really liked a lot of the updates. The world looked good; the new suits and discs were great. The gaming area was great; I really liked the new lightcycles; I wanted to see more of them. I thought Olivia Wilde nailed her performance. Hers was the best performance in this reviewer's opinion. The vehicles were all spectacular, and I think the visuals are the redeeming factor for this movie overall. I can also appreciate what they were trying to do in terms of story. Another thing that I appreciated was that there was nothing "Matrix-y" about this film.
I felt very sad after leaving and I slept on it before writing a review to make sure my opinion wouldn't change. Maybe the new mini-series' like The Walking Dead are spoiling me as a viewer, but I wanted better character development. I felt as though the story could have been vastly improved with a little better editing and tweaking. I didn't hate it and I would recommend that you watch, but it's not the masterpiece I was hoping to see.
The movie had either too much, or too little depth. The original had very little depth but I thought it worked very well. I could have used more action and less exposition or just a better fleshed out story. This movie falls squarely in the middle. The character Sam fluctuates between bad-ass and inept seemingly at will. I wish we could have picked one and stuck with it throughout the film. Jeff Bridges seems very much like "The Dude" and nothing like K. Flynn. I had only a few moments where the character seemed to say something I would've expected Flynn to say. Was this the fault of the director, the script, Jeff Bridges or a combination? Personally, I very much disliked the character of Zeus; I thought he didn't fit the world in any way. The fate of Tron left a very bad taste in my mouth. Bruce was underused considering how integral to the original story he was. They should have departed from the original completely, or had more ties with the original. I felt as though the script needed a bit more work before they filmed it. Was this pushed out by Disney instead of taking enough time to polish it? I really liked a lot of the updates. The world looked good; the new suits and discs were great. The gaming area was great; I really liked the new lightcycles; I wanted to see more of them. I thought Olivia Wilde nailed her performance. Hers was the best performance in this reviewer's opinion. The vehicles were all spectacular, and I think the visuals are the redeeming factor for this movie overall. I can also appreciate what they were trying to do in terms of story. Another thing that I appreciated was that there was nothing "Matrix-y" about this film.
I felt very sad after leaving and I slept on it before writing a review to make sure my opinion wouldn't change. Maybe the new mini-series' like The Walking Dead are spoiling me as a viewer, but I wanted better character development. I felt as though the story could have been vastly improved with a little better editing and tweaking. I didn't hate it and I would recommend that you watch, but it's not the masterpiece I was hoping to see.
Visually Stuning
tiagojbastos14 January 2011
I'm not going to explain much about this movie story/premise, because I assume most viewers were fans of the original Tron.
When I first heard about this movie, I couldn't be more excited: an old movie with brand new technology? Even if the story turned out bad, it was a new Tron, and that alone made it perfect.
I watched the movie last night, in 3D, and it was a very pleasant experience for the most part, but don't think this is a great movie, because it's not.
Flynn (Jeff Bridges) is back, and in two shapes. An older Flynn, and a computer generated younger Flynn. The computer model looks good (for the most part), and it was necessary, otherwise we would have ended up with an old man with a ton of make-up on it's face, just to shave off a couple of years.
The movie starts with Flynn disappearing, and his son entering the Grid world in search of him. It's textbook script, but then again, what could we expect from Tron? It was never about the story, and this movie proves it. The plot is weak, and weakened by poor/unnecessary dialog and very shallow characters.
Luckily, none of that matters once the Grid world is shown to us. Visually it's great, and the action scenes are fun and fast-paced. I even dare saying it's the best 3D movie I saw so far, which also poses a problem: this movie looks great and feels great only in 3D, and in the theaters. I can't imagine myself in a few months buying the movie to watch in my sofa.
Another problem with the movie is that half-way through, it becomes repetitive. Maybe if they kept the action flowing, with little dialog, this movie would have been better, but trying to add depth to such a poor script ends up boring the audience.
The bottom-line is: Tron Legacy if fan-service. It a re-rendered universe with very little story, but very good looking.
7/10 if you watch it in the theaters, in 3D 4/10 anywhere else
When I first heard about this movie, I couldn't be more excited: an old movie with brand new technology? Even if the story turned out bad, it was a new Tron, and that alone made it perfect.
I watched the movie last night, in 3D, and it was a very pleasant experience for the most part, but don't think this is a great movie, because it's not.
Flynn (Jeff Bridges) is back, and in two shapes. An older Flynn, and a computer generated younger Flynn. The computer model looks good (for the most part), and it was necessary, otherwise we would have ended up with an old man with a ton of make-up on it's face, just to shave off a couple of years.
The movie starts with Flynn disappearing, and his son entering the Grid world in search of him. It's textbook script, but then again, what could we expect from Tron? It was never about the story, and this movie proves it. The plot is weak, and weakened by poor/unnecessary dialog and very shallow characters.
Luckily, none of that matters once the Grid world is shown to us. Visually it's great, and the action scenes are fun and fast-paced. I even dare saying it's the best 3D movie I saw so far, which also poses a problem: this movie looks great and feels great only in 3D, and in the theaters. I can't imagine myself in a few months buying the movie to watch in my sofa.
Another problem with the movie is that half-way through, it becomes repetitive. Maybe if they kept the action flowing, with little dialog, this movie would have been better, but trying to add depth to such a poor script ends up boring the audience.
The bottom-line is: Tron Legacy if fan-service. It a re-rendered universe with very little story, but very good looking.
7/10 if you watch it in the theaters, in 3D 4/10 anywhere else
Late sequel with rousing images and fantastic computer generator scenarios
ma-cortes5 September 2011
This belated follow-up deals with Sam Flynn ( a brave young man well played by Garrett Hedlund ) , a rebellious 27-year-old , is haunted by the mysterious disappearance of his father , a computer genius named Kevin Flynn ( the old creator whiz who was flapped inside a computer game , being stunningly performed by veteran Jeff Bridges ) , a man once known as the world's leading video-game developer . When Sam investigates a strange signal sent from the old Flynn's Arcade -- a signal that could only come from his father-- he finds himself pulled into a digital world where Kevin has been trapped for 20 years . During his investigation Sam is zapped into another dimension and finds himself a player in a giant gladiatorial video-game competition . As he is sucked inside a powerful computer where he must fight for his life but with the help of the fearless warrior Quorra ( a gorgeous Olivia Wilde ), father and son embark on a life-or-death journey across a cyber universe -- a universe created by Kevin himself that has become far more advanced with vehicles, weapons, landscapes and a ruthless villain ( a computer generated Jeff Bridges who with his charisma keeps afloat the film ) who will stop at nothing to prevent their escape.
It's an agreeable , if somewhat light-headed piece of escapism with state-of-art special effects . Big-budgeted film led to break into the booming Sci-Fi/adventure/fantasy market full of inventiveness and imagination . This exciting movie is full of thrills , action-packed , fights , tension, suspense and overwhelming races , but also several commercial elements , including computer-simulated violence . This is a dynamic, fast-paced and amusing movie . Full of action, it's complemented by spectacular scenes , breathtaking flights and duels with illuminated disks . Stunning action though the story runs out of steam too soon , however the thrilling ending arises the film . The flick relies heavily on the overlong and death-defying races that are incredible and magnificently made by 3D computer generator . The tale moves like a supersonic bullet for most of its running time and the last generation of fantastic computer generator effects steal the show . Contrived beyond belief with spectacular motorcycle races that play like video games , but slickly calculated to please 2010 audiences and children especially . Garrett Hedlund is good as valiant racer , he's an instinctive , stubborn and valiant young man . Olivia Wilde is beautiful as computer-generated young . Michael Sheen stands out as ceremony master in a similar acting to Joel Grey-Cabaret . Colorful cinematography plenty of neon and glittering color by Claudio Miranda . Impressive and groundbreaking production design by Darren Gilford . Stirring and moving musical score by Punk , though composed by means of synthesizer . The motion picture is well directed by Joseph Kosinski . This is a superior sequel , much better that original ¨Tron¨ by Steven Lisberger , now as producer,that proved to be a precursor for the modern cinema and also with the same actors as Jeff Bridges and Bruce Boxleitner , though doesn't appears David Warner , the former baddie as corporate executive realizing evil-doings , here replaced by Michael Sheen and Jeff Bridges in double role as good and bad guy . Rating : 6,5 . Good , well worth watching , the movie boasts some impressive C.G. animation , reaching a high level of entertainment and excitement commensurate with its effect budget .
It's an agreeable , if somewhat light-headed piece of escapism with state-of-art special effects . Big-budgeted film led to break into the booming Sci-Fi/adventure/fantasy market full of inventiveness and imagination . This exciting movie is full of thrills , action-packed , fights , tension, suspense and overwhelming races , but also several commercial elements , including computer-simulated violence . This is a dynamic, fast-paced and amusing movie . Full of action, it's complemented by spectacular scenes , breathtaking flights and duels with illuminated disks . Stunning action though the story runs out of steam too soon , however the thrilling ending arises the film . The flick relies heavily on the overlong and death-defying races that are incredible and magnificently made by 3D computer generator . The tale moves like a supersonic bullet for most of its running time and the last generation of fantastic computer generator effects steal the show . Contrived beyond belief with spectacular motorcycle races that play like video games , but slickly calculated to please 2010 audiences and children especially . Garrett Hedlund is good as valiant racer , he's an instinctive , stubborn and valiant young man . Olivia Wilde is beautiful as computer-generated young . Michael Sheen stands out as ceremony master in a similar acting to Joel Grey-Cabaret . Colorful cinematography plenty of neon and glittering color by Claudio Miranda . Impressive and groundbreaking production design by Darren Gilford . Stirring and moving musical score by Punk , though composed by means of synthesizer . The motion picture is well directed by Joseph Kosinski . This is a superior sequel , much better that original ¨Tron¨ by Steven Lisberger , now as producer,that proved to be a precursor for the modern cinema and also with the same actors as Jeff Bridges and Bruce Boxleitner , though doesn't appears David Warner , the former baddie as corporate executive realizing evil-doings , here replaced by Michael Sheen and Jeff Bridges in double role as good and bad guy . Rating : 6,5 . Good , well worth watching , the movie boasts some impressive C.G. animation , reaching a high level of entertainment and excitement commensurate with its effect budget .
very VERY disappointed Tron fan...
fredwerner28 December 2010
In the 28 years since the original Tron movie, there have been, oh, a few innovations in the world of computers, networks, electronics, and communications. But somehow, the makers of this sequel seem to have missed inventions such as "The World Wide Web". They passed on a tremendous opportunity to make "Tron Legacy" as innovative and powerful as the original. Instead, they've merely sullied our memories by reducing what was a tremendous and ominous world into the digital equivalent of Smalltown, USA.
In 1982, few people had computers, far fewer had even heard of computer networks, and hardly anyone outside the military had heard of "the internet." The creators of the original movie crafted an entire alternate plane of existence, accessible only to computer programmers, in a time when the words "virtual" and "reality" both still meant "true." Their inspired fantasy gave audiences an entirely new perspective on the nascent digital age.
The original's bold, limitless universe, is limited in the sequel to "The Grid", a small city from which good guys escape from effortlessly, and from which bad guys seem to have no trouble leaving, though you're given the impression it never occurred to them to look beyond the borders of their extremely small town before. And the entire world is wholly disconnected from any computer system used by anyone on Earth. The only link to reality is the exact same machine hidden in a forgotten room. It's as if the film-makers hoped we'd forget that now, 30 years later, almost EVERYONE is on a computer network in one way or another.
The original Tron also created real tension by crafting a plot where what happened inside the system mattered. Even before the original Jeff Bridges character was sucked into the digital netherworld, the audience had a palpable sense of the impending doom to all humanity posed by the growing strength of the computer network. In this sequel, the "real-world" angle is a lame-duck corporation's unapologetically pathetic efforts at keeping market share. Even that side story introduced in the beginning, isn't given any relevance to anything that happens in the rest of the movie. The larger threat of a digital character emerging from "The Grid" into the real world is repeated throughout the film, but never in a credible way. Why should we be scared about him getting out? What would he do here? How would a computer program have any power outside a computer system?
There were endless ways the filmmakers could have used today's globally integrated technologies and on-line mania to make Tron Legacy as relevant as the original. The bad guys could have tried to empower Wii systems to control people instead of the other way around, or to animate an army of Second Life avatars, or to rewrite all of Wikipedia to brainwash every student in America, or to take control of every electronic device on Earth (think Y2K).
Tron Legacy has dazzling visual graphics, but it falls into that disappointing category of films that match astronomically high priced production values with cut-rate B-movie plots, acting, and character development. Saddest of all is that no one bothered to spend a dime of those hundreds of millions of dollars to follow the true legacy of Tron: to inspire us with the possibilities of where the next digital universe might take us.
In 1982, few people had computers, far fewer had even heard of computer networks, and hardly anyone outside the military had heard of "the internet." The creators of the original movie crafted an entire alternate plane of existence, accessible only to computer programmers, in a time when the words "virtual" and "reality" both still meant "true." Their inspired fantasy gave audiences an entirely new perspective on the nascent digital age.
The original's bold, limitless universe, is limited in the sequel to "The Grid", a small city from which good guys escape from effortlessly, and from which bad guys seem to have no trouble leaving, though you're given the impression it never occurred to them to look beyond the borders of their extremely small town before. And the entire world is wholly disconnected from any computer system used by anyone on Earth. The only link to reality is the exact same machine hidden in a forgotten room. It's as if the film-makers hoped we'd forget that now, 30 years later, almost EVERYONE is on a computer network in one way or another.
The original Tron also created real tension by crafting a plot where what happened inside the system mattered. Even before the original Jeff Bridges character was sucked into the digital netherworld, the audience had a palpable sense of the impending doom to all humanity posed by the growing strength of the computer network. In this sequel, the "real-world" angle is a lame-duck corporation's unapologetically pathetic efforts at keeping market share. Even that side story introduced in the beginning, isn't given any relevance to anything that happens in the rest of the movie. The larger threat of a digital character emerging from "The Grid" into the real world is repeated throughout the film, but never in a credible way. Why should we be scared about him getting out? What would he do here? How would a computer program have any power outside a computer system?
There were endless ways the filmmakers could have used today's globally integrated technologies and on-line mania to make Tron Legacy as relevant as the original. The bad guys could have tried to empower Wii systems to control people instead of the other way around, or to animate an army of Second Life avatars, or to rewrite all of Wikipedia to brainwash every student in America, or to take control of every electronic device on Earth (think Y2K).
Tron Legacy has dazzling visual graphics, but it falls into that disappointing category of films that match astronomically high priced production values with cut-rate B-movie plots, acting, and character development. Saddest of all is that no one bothered to spend a dime of those hundreds of millions of dollars to follow the true legacy of Tron: to inspire us with the possibilities of where the next digital universe might take us.
Powerful, moving, beautiful, disconcerting... flawed but worthwhile!
david-282923 February 2011
Powerful sounds & special effects, a dystopian computer world and a classic human vs. machine battle for survival. What's not to like!? Well, unfortunately enough that it's not an instant classic, but still a terrific addition to sci-fi cinema! What is so cool about the movie is the upgraded but still retro feeling of the Tron world. The detail is striking and pulls us in and keeps us in a strange land. It is a rather bleak world (why didn't they program in some sunlight?)... so we're thankful for the welcome bits of levity and "human-ness" found in the father-son connections. Quorra also provides smiles and such wonderful soulful eyes we can almost sense things will be okay from her gaze alone.
As unbelievable as it might be for Flynn Jr. (Sam) to survive the light disc battles and the light cycles, etc. it does make wonderful visual popcorn. In fact, I think the light cycles with the new multi-layered tracks is one of the best scenes of the entire movie! Other cool stuff is sprinkled all throughout the movie, from the huge claw-shaped ships, to battle arenas with breakable floor tiles to the streamlined flying ships at the end There are a number of things that knock at the edges of this world allowing reality to creep in. First we have the completely CGI Clu, who although impressive for a computer-generated human still gives off that strange vibe of not being "real". When surrounded by real human actors the effect bothers a little.
Second, it is rather unbelievable for a human (even as physically fit as Sam Flynn) to survive highly trained computer programs with lightning fast reflexes. This action-movie convention has always bothered me... and is worsened by the hyper-speed and quick cuts used in this film.
Third, the story is somewhat confusing and requires a lot of exposition by Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges). I like his Matrix-ish powers, but if he has special abilities like that it should've been no problem for him to escape a long time ago. Overall there are just a lot of plot holes, and the motivation behind Clu and his minions is not well explained. For example, why would Clu need to invade our world instead of just visit it? The programs seem happy, so why take them somewhere else? Seems like there's always SOME megolomaniac building an army! In any case, fans of the 1982 original will find some inside jokes and have that nostalgia factor, but the movie is fresh enough that it should create many new Tron fans as well. I imagine the first Tron movie will see renewed interest... I know I wanted to see it again as soon as the credits rolled on Tron: Legacy.
But I have to ask... after all our heroes go through, they drive off on a motorcycle without helmets! C'mon, that's just asking for a spoof ending...
As unbelievable as it might be for Flynn Jr. (Sam) to survive the light disc battles and the light cycles, etc. it does make wonderful visual popcorn. In fact, I think the light cycles with the new multi-layered tracks is one of the best scenes of the entire movie! Other cool stuff is sprinkled all throughout the movie, from the huge claw-shaped ships, to battle arenas with breakable floor tiles to the streamlined flying ships at the end There are a number of things that knock at the edges of this world allowing reality to creep in. First we have the completely CGI Clu, who although impressive for a computer-generated human still gives off that strange vibe of not being "real". When surrounded by real human actors the effect bothers a little.
Second, it is rather unbelievable for a human (even as physically fit as Sam Flynn) to survive highly trained computer programs with lightning fast reflexes. This action-movie convention has always bothered me... and is worsened by the hyper-speed and quick cuts used in this film.
Third, the story is somewhat confusing and requires a lot of exposition by Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges). I like his Matrix-ish powers, but if he has special abilities like that it should've been no problem for him to escape a long time ago. Overall there are just a lot of plot holes, and the motivation behind Clu and his minions is not well explained. For example, why would Clu need to invade our world instead of just visit it? The programs seem happy, so why take them somewhere else? Seems like there's always SOME megolomaniac building an army! In any case, fans of the 1982 original will find some inside jokes and have that nostalgia factor, but the movie is fresh enough that it should create many new Tron fans as well. I imagine the first Tron movie will see renewed interest... I know I wanted to see it again as soon as the credits rolled on Tron: Legacy.
But I have to ask... after all our heroes go through, they drive off on a motorcycle without helmets! C'mon, that's just asking for a spoof ending...
Trontastic...
Chalice_Of_Evil15 December 2010
I'd never seen the original 'Tron', nor did I really know much about it. I'd only heard the movie referenced in other things on occasion (like that one episode of The Simpsons where Homer's trapped in the Third Dimension and asks if anybody saw the movie 'Tron', and everyone answers "No". I was in the same boat as them). The previews for 'TRON: Legacy' looked visually stunning, and I'm happy to report it does not disappoint in that regard. Everything seen inside 'The Grid' is a wonder to behold/a visual feast. But is this the only good thing the film has going for it? Well...yes and no. As far as the characters/actors who portray them are concerned, Garrett Hedlund is decent as Sam Flynn. Yes, he has to utter some clunky dialogue along the way and is a bit stiff at times, but he serves the role well enough. At times he reminded me of Hayden Christensen as Anakin Skywalker (what with the pulling out of lightsabers...I mean discs, donning of cloaks, etc), though thankfully he's not half as bad as that guy.
Jeff Bridges gives a solid performance as Sam's dad, Kevin Flynn, and the father/son relationship he has with Sam is central to the film. The only thing that detracts from his performance is his character's digitized clone, Clu. No matter how hard they've tried to create a youthful-looking Jeff Bridges using computer magic, he *still* looks like a "cartoon" (as someone in the audience put it when I saw the movie at the theatre). While it's annoying, it would have at least been tolerable had it been limited to just the scenes inside The Grid (though it still would've raised the question of why he looked so fake while everyone else looked so real). However, the movie starts in the real world with a "young" Kevin Flynn telling his son the story of Tron/The Grid, and you can plainly tell the drastic difference between a real and fake Jeff Bridges. It's so obvious and very distracting.
Meanwhile, Olivia Wilde kicks butt and looks great doing it (in her neon light-up skintight catsuit and her asymmetrical wig) as the warrior, Quorra. She seems to be having WAY more fun with this role than she ever did in her role of Thirteen on the TV series House. Quorra's joyous laughter at odd times gives her an endearing quality, she has a slight naivety about her in regards to some things (which allows for some comedic moments) and displays a sense of childlike wonder (especially in the film's final shot). Wilde and Hedlund share some good scenes together, and her character at least gets *some* development...which is more than I can say for the albino-like "Siren", Gem (Beau Garrett, who looks visually interesting...but there doesn't seem to be much else going on with her). Faring better is Michael Sheen as as Castor/Zuse. While he does tend to "ham it up" a bit, at least he provides one of the film's more memorable performances.
Apart from the animation of Young Kevin Flynn, there are a couple of other 'minuses' of the film, like the dialogue (which at times isn't great) as well as the fact that the beginning is somewhat slow/kinda boring and things don't really get moving until we are transported along with Sam inside The Grid. However, once we're in there...the visuals most certainly make up for these minor quibbles. The movie looks STUNNING. There's the "games", which mostly seem to involve throwing discs (which resemble Xena's round killing thing) at each other, causing those who are hit to "derez" (ie. Cease to exist). Then there's the Light Cycles, Light Runners, and all modes of "Light" transportation which make for thrilling action/chase sequences. Another 'plus' of this film is its excellent score which adds SO much to the movie's atmosphere. While some fans of the original film may or may not like this one, for someone like myself (who this movie introduced to the 'Tron' world for the first time), it was quite entertaining and probably the best 'Tron' sequel you're ever going to get.
Jeff Bridges gives a solid performance as Sam's dad, Kevin Flynn, and the father/son relationship he has with Sam is central to the film. The only thing that detracts from his performance is his character's digitized clone, Clu. No matter how hard they've tried to create a youthful-looking Jeff Bridges using computer magic, he *still* looks like a "cartoon" (as someone in the audience put it when I saw the movie at the theatre). While it's annoying, it would have at least been tolerable had it been limited to just the scenes inside The Grid (though it still would've raised the question of why he looked so fake while everyone else looked so real). However, the movie starts in the real world with a "young" Kevin Flynn telling his son the story of Tron/The Grid, and you can plainly tell the drastic difference between a real and fake Jeff Bridges. It's so obvious and very distracting.
Meanwhile, Olivia Wilde kicks butt and looks great doing it (in her neon light-up skintight catsuit and her asymmetrical wig) as the warrior, Quorra. She seems to be having WAY more fun with this role than she ever did in her role of Thirteen on the TV series House. Quorra's joyous laughter at odd times gives her an endearing quality, she has a slight naivety about her in regards to some things (which allows for some comedic moments) and displays a sense of childlike wonder (especially in the film's final shot). Wilde and Hedlund share some good scenes together, and her character at least gets *some* development...which is more than I can say for the albino-like "Siren", Gem (Beau Garrett, who looks visually interesting...but there doesn't seem to be much else going on with her). Faring better is Michael Sheen as as Castor/Zuse. While he does tend to "ham it up" a bit, at least he provides one of the film's more memorable performances.
Apart from the animation of Young Kevin Flynn, there are a couple of other 'minuses' of the film, like the dialogue (which at times isn't great) as well as the fact that the beginning is somewhat slow/kinda boring and things don't really get moving until we are transported along with Sam inside The Grid. However, once we're in there...the visuals most certainly make up for these minor quibbles. The movie looks STUNNING. There's the "games", which mostly seem to involve throwing discs (which resemble Xena's round killing thing) at each other, causing those who are hit to "derez" (ie. Cease to exist). Then there's the Light Cycles, Light Runners, and all modes of "Light" transportation which make for thrilling action/chase sequences. Another 'plus' of this film is its excellent score which adds SO much to the movie's atmosphere. While some fans of the original film may or may not like this one, for someone like myself (who this movie introduced to the 'Tron' world for the first time), it was quite entertaining and probably the best 'Tron' sequel you're ever going to get.
This will rock for fans of the original but others maybe scratching their heads
theycallmemrglass5 December 2010
Saw this at a preview screening in London yesterday in 3D.
First of all, I'll just say a few words on the 3D. I am normally anti 3D with non animated films as they tend to be too dark, and often blurry with fast action scenes, making real live action feel unreal. However Tron is mostly computer animated and is well suited for the 3d media. And here it certainly was effective. I especially loved the way they held back on the 3d until the right moment for maximum impact. Think of Dorothy stepping out of her house into Oz and you'll get the idea.
I fall in the category of original Tron lovers but not a hardcore one. So for me, this sequel did rock for the most part. Remarkably it maintains the same atmospheric feel as the original and is flooded with nostalgic references to the 28 year old original. From the 80s jukebox in Flynns nightclub playing Eurythmics "Dreams" to the familiar world inside the computer brains.
The now much older Jeff bridges exerts a more heavier gravitas on screen and voices his CGI counterpart in the Grid world that frankly still looks CGI but isn't a problem as they are computer avatars. At the beginning of the movie, a young CGI Bridges is shown in the real world but the lighting is darkened to convince us he is real...and they very nearly pull it off but not quite.
The action cgi scenes are breathtaking and exciting, with upgraded versions of the famous grid race, sky battles, and disk combats. Visuals were stunning and faithful to the original aesthetics.
Unfortunately, the middle of the film sags considerably and I did find myself yawning as the story did become a little disjointed.
The soundtrack is brilliant, though very reminiscent of Dark Knight and Inception.
Overall, I had a blast and is a worthy sequel that will rock the fans but I do feel however, that non fans will be scratching their heads wondering what the fuss is about.
First of all, I'll just say a few words on the 3D. I am normally anti 3D with non animated films as they tend to be too dark, and often blurry with fast action scenes, making real live action feel unreal. However Tron is mostly computer animated and is well suited for the 3d media. And here it certainly was effective. I especially loved the way they held back on the 3d until the right moment for maximum impact. Think of Dorothy stepping out of her house into Oz and you'll get the idea.
I fall in the category of original Tron lovers but not a hardcore one. So for me, this sequel did rock for the most part. Remarkably it maintains the same atmospheric feel as the original and is flooded with nostalgic references to the 28 year old original. From the 80s jukebox in Flynns nightclub playing Eurythmics "Dreams" to the familiar world inside the computer brains.
The now much older Jeff bridges exerts a more heavier gravitas on screen and voices his CGI counterpart in the Grid world that frankly still looks CGI but isn't a problem as they are computer avatars. At the beginning of the movie, a young CGI Bridges is shown in the real world but the lighting is darkened to convince us he is real...and they very nearly pull it off but not quite.
The action cgi scenes are breathtaking and exciting, with upgraded versions of the famous grid race, sky battles, and disk combats. Visuals were stunning and faithful to the original aesthetics.
Unfortunately, the middle of the film sags considerably and I did find myself yawning as the story did become a little disjointed.
The soundtrack is brilliant, though very reminiscent of Dark Knight and Inception.
Overall, I had a blast and is a worthy sequel that will rock the fans but I do feel however, that non fans will be scratching their heads wondering what the fuss is about.
Slow, Boring, Incomplete and Pretty
pbatik18 December 2010
In a sentence: Go watch the original. Unlike this sterilized computer generated FX production, it has a soul, and a script.
I had high hopes for TRON Legacy to rise above the many FX/3D releases that seem to flood the theaters lately. Afterall, TRON harnessed computer generated graphics nearly 30 years ago- and at that time, it was ground breaking. But now? sure, the graphics are improved, but so is every similar FX assisted production since 1982. Computers are faster, designers have more cpu power to play with, and 3D projection systems finally hit it right. But what about everything else that makes a movie? like.. a plot?
Sadly, TRON is just another casualty of eye candy. Whether it is the sublime virtual world which rehashes 28 year old ideas infused with modern pixel engines, or the pretty and naive Ms. Wilde tucked in her tights and serving as the Megan Fox of Tronville- TRON does not fly. It grudgingly crawls through a plot that is as expected and transparent as government propaganda: there's good, there's bad, there's conflict, and there's the evident triumph of good over evil. In the way, we meet characters which serve no point, have neither depth nor lifespan, and have nothing but to provide except for additional FX opportunities.
TRON closely follows the footsteps of AVATAR: a technological demo with a script that can fit in a brochure. Stunningly boring.
The ultimate star of the show, Bridges, tries hard but can't pull the plot on his own. Once in a while, he utters a notable comment with a hint of Big Lebowski which draws a few smiles, but has no one else in the cast to play with. Wilde plays a sexy role muttering a 3rd grader script, while Hedlund's role is the juvenile irresponsible punk with Brad Pitt and Robin Hood aspirations- leaving zero aftertaste. The only other memorable actor (besides Bridges) is Michael Sheen, which we're blessed with for far too few moments. Blame Disney for that choice.
Tron Legacy is a waste of time. 28 years ago, Tron felt as if it had been brought back from the future. The new incarnation is technology demo, with sprinkles of Bridges and a remarkable sound track. Do yourself a favor and watch something else.
I had high hopes for TRON Legacy to rise above the many FX/3D releases that seem to flood the theaters lately. Afterall, TRON harnessed computer generated graphics nearly 30 years ago- and at that time, it was ground breaking. But now? sure, the graphics are improved, but so is every similar FX assisted production since 1982. Computers are faster, designers have more cpu power to play with, and 3D projection systems finally hit it right. But what about everything else that makes a movie? like.. a plot?
Sadly, TRON is just another casualty of eye candy. Whether it is the sublime virtual world which rehashes 28 year old ideas infused with modern pixel engines, or the pretty and naive Ms. Wilde tucked in her tights and serving as the Megan Fox of Tronville- TRON does not fly. It grudgingly crawls through a plot that is as expected and transparent as government propaganda: there's good, there's bad, there's conflict, and there's the evident triumph of good over evil. In the way, we meet characters which serve no point, have neither depth nor lifespan, and have nothing but to provide except for additional FX opportunities.
TRON closely follows the footsteps of AVATAR: a technological demo with a script that can fit in a brochure. Stunningly boring.
The ultimate star of the show, Bridges, tries hard but can't pull the plot on his own. Once in a while, he utters a notable comment with a hint of Big Lebowski which draws a few smiles, but has no one else in the cast to play with. Wilde plays a sexy role muttering a 3rd grader script, while Hedlund's role is the juvenile irresponsible punk with Brad Pitt and Robin Hood aspirations- leaving zero aftertaste. The only other memorable actor (besides Bridges) is Michael Sheen, which we're blessed with for far too few moments. Blame Disney for that choice.
Tron Legacy is a waste of time. 28 years ago, Tron felt as if it had been brought back from the future. The new incarnation is technology demo, with sprinkles of Bridges and a remarkable sound track. Do yourself a favor and watch something else.
Style over substance? Yes, but what style!
ced_yuen25 January 2011
'Tron: Legacy' is not a perfect film, and nobody will feel otherwise. Some elements of the story are cloudy. The lead actor is a bit wooden. CGI young-Jeff Bridges is a bit hit-and- miss. The famous Light Cycles are underused. The 3D was totally unnecessary. And the product placement for Ducati was unsubtle. However, that is all the negativity that the film deserves. 'Tron: Legacy' has flaws, but these are outweighed by the pure sensory pleasure on offer.
The Grid, in which 90% of the story takes place, looks gorgeous. It is a slick, dark world, simply yet effectively punctuated by lines of neon light. It is as alien as the world in 'Avatar', but much more striking. Whereas 'Avatar' bombarded viewers with layer upon layer of colour and clutter, Tron's minimalist, neon-chiaroscuro approach allows viewers to identify and admire the individual elements that make up The Grid. The film is shown in an incredibly neat manner, perhaps channelling director Joseph Kosinski's previous experience as an architect: everything is perfectly framed, every shot vying for a place as your computer's wallpaper.
Then there's the action, which is absolutely spectacular. The most impressive scenes take place in the Arena, a neon Colosseum where spectator programs scream for the death (or "de-resolution") of gladiators. Disc Battles are the cyber equivalent of playing ultimate frisbee with circular saw blades. Light Cycle battles are a cross between medieval jousting and Snake on your mobile phone. The action occasionally takes liberties with the laws of gravity, not as much as in 'Inception' but enough to keep things fun. The combination of the unique visual style with incredibly satisfying action results in a hypnotic 2-hour light show that sucks you right in and makes you forget about the real world.
Strange as it may seem, it is the sound that really ties the film together. 'Tron: Legacy' is without doubt the best-sounding film that I have ever seen. Light Cycles buzz and hum like lightsabers plugged into the mains. When programs are "derezzed" (deleted) they sound like shattered glass. Everything has its own aural identity - the wide range of bass-heavy, static effects perfectly convey the energy of The Grid.
Daft Punk's score is the jewel in this neon crown. Their Euro-disco heritage compliments the film perfectly, but they are restrained enough not to bop their way through everything. Fast- paced electro is balanced with slow orchestration. Sometimes the two are effectively combined to create an electric version of the percussive ambiance in 'The Dark Knight' and 'Inception'.
The acting is a mixed bag, neither making nor breaking the film. Garrett Hedlund is passable, struggling with emotion, but still better than Hayden Christensen in 'Star Wars'. Jeff Bridges does a good job with his two characters, simultaneously playing a tragic version of The Dude and a ruthless megalomaniac. In a marmite homage to David Bowie, Michael Sheen prances through his scenes, which will amuse some but irritate others. Olivia Wilde gives the best performance as Quorra, a warrior-princess style program with an interesting child-like innocence.
Reactions to the original 'Tron' was mixed. Some felt that it pushed the boundaries of cinematic spectacle, but some found it a hollow experience, accusing it of being all style, no substance. But the same thing happened with 'Fantasia' and '2001: A Space Odyssey'. It seems that films with an emphasis on visual style have a tendency to generate polarised reactions, the contrast of which is not necessarily a comment on a film's quality. 'Tron: Legacy' follows this trend.
Many will criticise the lack of narrative substance, but there is enough to keep the story of 'Tron: Legacy' moving. Its strength lies in its value as an audio-visual feast. It would be foolish to expect otherwise.
The Grid, in which 90% of the story takes place, looks gorgeous. It is a slick, dark world, simply yet effectively punctuated by lines of neon light. It is as alien as the world in 'Avatar', but much more striking. Whereas 'Avatar' bombarded viewers with layer upon layer of colour and clutter, Tron's minimalist, neon-chiaroscuro approach allows viewers to identify and admire the individual elements that make up The Grid. The film is shown in an incredibly neat manner, perhaps channelling director Joseph Kosinski's previous experience as an architect: everything is perfectly framed, every shot vying for a place as your computer's wallpaper.
Then there's the action, which is absolutely spectacular. The most impressive scenes take place in the Arena, a neon Colosseum where spectator programs scream for the death (or "de-resolution") of gladiators. Disc Battles are the cyber equivalent of playing ultimate frisbee with circular saw blades. Light Cycle battles are a cross between medieval jousting and Snake on your mobile phone. The action occasionally takes liberties with the laws of gravity, not as much as in 'Inception' but enough to keep things fun. The combination of the unique visual style with incredibly satisfying action results in a hypnotic 2-hour light show that sucks you right in and makes you forget about the real world.
Strange as it may seem, it is the sound that really ties the film together. 'Tron: Legacy' is without doubt the best-sounding film that I have ever seen. Light Cycles buzz and hum like lightsabers plugged into the mains. When programs are "derezzed" (deleted) they sound like shattered glass. Everything has its own aural identity - the wide range of bass-heavy, static effects perfectly convey the energy of The Grid.
Daft Punk's score is the jewel in this neon crown. Their Euro-disco heritage compliments the film perfectly, but they are restrained enough not to bop their way through everything. Fast- paced electro is balanced with slow orchestration. Sometimes the two are effectively combined to create an electric version of the percussive ambiance in 'The Dark Knight' and 'Inception'.
The acting is a mixed bag, neither making nor breaking the film. Garrett Hedlund is passable, struggling with emotion, but still better than Hayden Christensen in 'Star Wars'. Jeff Bridges does a good job with his two characters, simultaneously playing a tragic version of The Dude and a ruthless megalomaniac. In a marmite homage to David Bowie, Michael Sheen prances through his scenes, which will amuse some but irritate others. Olivia Wilde gives the best performance as Quorra, a warrior-princess style program with an interesting child-like innocence.
Reactions to the original 'Tron' was mixed. Some felt that it pushed the boundaries of cinematic spectacle, but some found it a hollow experience, accusing it of being all style, no substance. But the same thing happened with 'Fantasia' and '2001: A Space Odyssey'. It seems that films with an emphasis on visual style have a tendency to generate polarised reactions, the contrast of which is not necessarily a comment on a film's quality. 'Tron: Legacy' follows this trend.
Many will criticise the lack of narrative substance, but there is enough to keep the story of 'Tron: Legacy' moving. Its strength lies in its value as an audio-visual feast. It would be foolish to expect otherwise.
It's All About The Visuals and Daft Punk
TourettesPersonal19 December 2010
What are the reasons why see "Tron: Legacy"? You must be a fan of the first movie, The visuals looks stunning, hot chicks, and Daft Punk. Unfortunately you might get disappointed cause of the weak plot and slowness of the pacing. But if don't care about the story then you'll enjoy the visuals and the music score of Daft Punk. "Tron Legacy" is still worth watching if you want to see some awesome visuals and love Daft Punk.
The movie could have been better if there was a decent plot. The movie is completely dull but the visuals makes it very entertaining so does the action scenes. Besides the visuals the movie have Daft Punk. Daft Punk is the biggest reason why I'm here. Their electric music score brings a lot of epicness to this film.
The script is poorly executed and acting isn't done well(except Jeff Bridges & Michael Sheen) because the director is more focused to the visuals. That's why it's all about the action, special effects, and Daft Punk. It'll be better if the visuals and Daft Punk aren't the only one that is awesome. It's still worth watching if like movies with eye candy visuals and if you're a fan of Daft Punk.
The movie could have been better if there was a decent plot. The movie is completely dull but the visuals makes it very entertaining so does the action scenes. Besides the visuals the movie have Daft Punk. Daft Punk is the biggest reason why I'm here. Their electric music score brings a lot of epicness to this film.
The script is poorly executed and acting isn't done well(except Jeff Bridges & Michael Sheen) because the director is more focused to the visuals. That's why it's all about the action, special effects, and Daft Punk. It'll be better if the visuals and Daft Punk aren't the only one that is awesome. It's still worth watching if like movies with eye candy visuals and if you're a fan of Daft Punk.
A Cyber-Epic Film With an Amazing Rendering of the Digital World
aaronjbong17 December 2010
A science fiction movie made by Disney seems interesting enough especially when it's live-action and targeted for kids (Disney targets its movies for kids, right?). And there it is, "Tron: Legacy", a science fiction movie, Disney science fiction movie, live-action and targeted for kids. And yet, 3D.
"Tron: Legacy" is actually a sequel to the 1982 revolutionary film, "Tron" and marks the directorial debut of Joseph Kosinski. "Legacy" sets Kevin's son, Sam Flynn, 27 years in age as the main character who gets a message from Kevin (or so it is) from the world of Tron. He then goes to Flynn's arcade, enters some sort of mysterious room and plays with a computer which digitized him and entered him to the world of Tron. Then, he fights with other programs trying to find his father, Kevin Flynn who disappeared years ago. On the way, he meets Quorra, some cool machines and of course, Clu (Kevin's program).
I watched "Legacy" and found it to be really good. The rendering of the world of Tron was really breathtaking and got me in awe. All of the world is definitely going to make "Tron: Legacy" one hell of a blockbuster film and surely, one of the best films on the year 2010.
The acting had no problem. Jeff Bridges, after all those years since the first film is still fresh as ever. Garrett Hedlund was also not a problem in the film. Olivia Wilde as Quorra was stunning. The acting was definitely perfect. Everything.
The 3D effects. This was one funny thing. In the beginning of the film, it was noted that some parts of the film were in 2D and some were in 3D and you were asked to not take your 3D glasses off. I did broke the rule several times and saw something unique. Parts that were set in the real world, not in the world of Tron were displayed in 2D and parts that were set in the world of Tron were displayed in 3D. Anyways, the 3D worked pretty well. The Lightcycles in the film and all the things in the world of Tron, displayed in 3D were awesome.
The score of the film was also exciting. (The soundtrack was also great as it reached number 10 on the Billboard 200.) It was very awesome and thrilling with all the bass and everything.
Overall, "Tron: Legacy" is worth to watch. 3D works pretty fine in watching this film. Young kids would not really like this but maybe aged 8 and above would do. I believe this is the best film for December 2010 and is a good way to end blockbuster movies of 2010. Great job, Kosinski.
Prince AJB's Score: 85%
Thank you for reading my review on "Tron: Legacy" and hope it's useful.
"Tron: Legacy" is actually a sequel to the 1982 revolutionary film, "Tron" and marks the directorial debut of Joseph Kosinski. "Legacy" sets Kevin's son, Sam Flynn, 27 years in age as the main character who gets a message from Kevin (or so it is) from the world of Tron. He then goes to Flynn's arcade, enters some sort of mysterious room and plays with a computer which digitized him and entered him to the world of Tron. Then, he fights with other programs trying to find his father, Kevin Flynn who disappeared years ago. On the way, he meets Quorra, some cool machines and of course, Clu (Kevin's program).
I watched "Legacy" and found it to be really good. The rendering of the world of Tron was really breathtaking and got me in awe. All of the world is definitely going to make "Tron: Legacy" one hell of a blockbuster film and surely, one of the best films on the year 2010.
The acting had no problem. Jeff Bridges, after all those years since the first film is still fresh as ever. Garrett Hedlund was also not a problem in the film. Olivia Wilde as Quorra was stunning. The acting was definitely perfect. Everything.
The 3D effects. This was one funny thing. In the beginning of the film, it was noted that some parts of the film were in 2D and some were in 3D and you were asked to not take your 3D glasses off. I did broke the rule several times and saw something unique. Parts that were set in the real world, not in the world of Tron were displayed in 2D and parts that were set in the world of Tron were displayed in 3D. Anyways, the 3D worked pretty well. The Lightcycles in the film and all the things in the world of Tron, displayed in 3D were awesome.
The score of the film was also exciting. (The soundtrack was also great as it reached number 10 on the Billboard 200.) It was very awesome and thrilling with all the bass and everything.
Overall, "Tron: Legacy" is worth to watch. 3D works pretty fine in watching this film. Young kids would not really like this but maybe aged 8 and above would do. I believe this is the best film for December 2010 and is a good way to end blockbuster movies of 2010. Great job, Kosinski.
Prince AJB's Score: 85%
Thank you for reading my review on "Tron: Legacy" and hope it's useful.
Frankly, kind of a disappointment
dig_Sf2 March 2011
The firs Tron was great, new concepts and ideas, stunning effects (for those times) etc. etc.
Tron Legacy lacks certain things, the first of which, I would say, is a good cast. Garrett Hedlund gives a weak performance, he tries too hard to fill some shoes that just aren't his size, in addition, his "cool" guy style...just isn't believable. Olivia Wilde, overall, plays the character pretty good (not exceptional), giving a certain "charm" to Quorra. So the only true performance, not surprisingly, is that of Jeff Bridges who brings back to life the original character from the first Tron, with some very "smooth" and "jazzy" sprinkles of wisdom (some of the lines reminded me of his portrayal of "the Dude", in "The Big Lebowski". Michael Sheen also gave a good touch to Zuse.
The script was pretty good, but it lacks certain "depths" (I put this on the account of the movie being mostly based on the 3D effects, thus making it sort of a "for the masses" kind of flick), I'm sure the writers had much more in mind than this, but all in all, the script was interesting and intriguing, I would say that it succeeded in overcoming the challenges and rose to the value of the original ideas from the first script.
The soundtrack was exceptional, Daft Punk didn't fail in giving a great feeling to the movie, bringing in an almost "electric" kind of feel to the whole experience.
Where I feel that the movie "broke down" was in the lack of a stronger experience from the above mentioned characters. I didn't feel a connection, a "chemistry" (how it is often called), especially between Bridges and Hedlund and that kind of ruins some of the important "spiritual" moments between the characters.
To summarize, I'd say that the movie is worth a 6, for the whole 3D experience (which is very good), the soundtrack (which adds to the immersion into the Grid World) and the script (which I didn't expect to be this good), but for the already mentioned reasons, it lacks a profound depth. I never really "got lost" in the movie because Sam Flynn, as played by Hedlund, was never a believable character, and thus never really felt most of the important moments of drama and "pressure" that I was supposed to feel, making the whole movie lack emotional subjectivity.
Tron Legacy lacks certain things, the first of which, I would say, is a good cast. Garrett Hedlund gives a weak performance, he tries too hard to fill some shoes that just aren't his size, in addition, his "cool" guy style...just isn't believable. Olivia Wilde, overall, plays the character pretty good (not exceptional), giving a certain "charm" to Quorra. So the only true performance, not surprisingly, is that of Jeff Bridges who brings back to life the original character from the first Tron, with some very "smooth" and "jazzy" sprinkles of wisdom (some of the lines reminded me of his portrayal of "the Dude", in "The Big Lebowski". Michael Sheen also gave a good touch to Zuse.
The script was pretty good, but it lacks certain "depths" (I put this on the account of the movie being mostly based on the 3D effects, thus making it sort of a "for the masses" kind of flick), I'm sure the writers had much more in mind than this, but all in all, the script was interesting and intriguing, I would say that it succeeded in overcoming the challenges and rose to the value of the original ideas from the first script.
The soundtrack was exceptional, Daft Punk didn't fail in giving a great feeling to the movie, bringing in an almost "electric" kind of feel to the whole experience.
Where I feel that the movie "broke down" was in the lack of a stronger experience from the above mentioned characters. I didn't feel a connection, a "chemistry" (how it is often called), especially between Bridges and Hedlund and that kind of ruins some of the important "spiritual" moments between the characters.
To summarize, I'd say that the movie is worth a 6, for the whole 3D experience (which is very good), the soundtrack (which adds to the immersion into the Grid World) and the script (which I didn't expect to be this good), but for the already mentioned reasons, it lacks a profound depth. I never really "got lost" in the movie because Sam Flynn, as played by Hedlund, was never a believable character, and thus never really felt most of the important moments of drama and "pressure" that I was supposed to feel, making the whole movie lack emotional subjectivity.
A Nutshell Review: TRON: Legacy
DICK STEEL13 December 2010
There's a fairly coherent storyline here that would appeal across the spectrum, striking a fair balance between drama and action, although action junkies would have preferred for set action sequences given the investment in souping up and introducing a number of vehicles other than the light cycle.
Certain scenes stood out either as homage or influenced pieces, and perhaps you may disagree with me, but the nightclub scene with Gem the Siren (Beau Garrett) bringing our new protagonist Sam Flynn (Garrett Hedlund), the son of Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges returns to once again play two roles, that of Kevin Flynn the founder of Encom and his digital creation / avatar Clu) to meet Castor (played by Michael Sheen with flamboyant spunk) an information broker in the undergrounds of the digital Grid world, seems to have contained a whiff out of The Matrix Revolutions, with Persephone and Merovingian. But of course the Wachowskis didn't have Daft Punk to turn the tables, and parallels between the Matrix and the Grid cannot be more prominent given entities within are programs, with the ones gone rogue instilled with a desire to cross over to the real world.
Then there's something unmistakably Star Wars about it too, with the designs of attack space crafts zipping through the night sky, and clearly one of the many gorgeous costumes here can't seem to hold a candle to what looked like an awesome robe, simple as it is, but striking nonetheless. Or how about something which reminds one of Gotham City's caped crusader, with the Tumbler inspired getaway vehicle with large inflatable tyres played out in a scene right out of Tim Burton's first Batman movie with the long road back to the secret hideout within which to seek out answers to questions left silent en route.
So I may be stretching it, but there will be certain degrees of familiarity you'll find in some moments of the story, but I assure you the crux of it is a film that has deeper pathos, dealing with man's relentless pursuit for perfection and utopia, and the desire to play god if given a chance. Creations made in the image of is quite pronounced in a scene that stood out almost like Michelangelo's Creation of Adam, although here it's interpreted in the digital realm. Humans aren't perfect, so our creations in all likelihood will inherit some of our flaws, no matter if they happen to be digital and following certain fixed patterns and constructs. It's what being human is all about with our imperfection. The dramatic elements here between Father and Son is the film's strength to provide that emotional anchor and attachment making this a digital affair with plenty of soul, and the chemistry shared between Jeff Bridges and Garrett Hedlund make them quite the father and son pair up, with shades of how revered the former is within his own created realm, and the tremendous power that he still holds even if in exile.
Olivia Wilde provides for the token fashionista who is ever ready to flex her battle prowess with skills in various weapons - a lethal combination of The Matrix's Trinity equipped with Star Wars blades - and vehicles, whose background is given a superficial twist which seeks to expand the TRON universe a little bit more with miracle phenomenon being a natural occurrence once a perfect equilibrium is achieved. Fans will get to learn and understand this expanded universe a lot more as explanations get dished out in due course, even one that deals with the time in between the first and second films, of Kevin Flynn's obsession with his latest playground that his creation ultimately took over, turning it into an arena with its own brand of gladiatorial fights for entertainment. But there's enough material introduced without being overwhelming for the new Grid entrant, and opens up a lot more avenues for future storytellers.
Even for those days, I wasn't one of those who got instantly impressed by the effects of the time, but then again that's what made TRON stand out based on its uniqueness in look. It was way ahead with combining live action with computer generated graphics, and in the same fashion, the filmmakers here had done an admirable job prepping this film up for 3D. 3D may be the latest Hollywood fad that got people jumping onto its bandwagon, but just as how computer graphics has to be inherent in the first TRON movie, the updates of the franchise has to keep up with the times, and in true reel mimicking real life, The Grid pops up in more than 2 dimensions, starting with the light cycle wars that include an additional dimension to consider, which makes for some thrilling action, both on or under the ground and in the air, rather than just becoming a mere special effect.
But I had to admit my personal hook line and sinker to watch this film, is the soundtrack by Daft Punk. It stands out most definitely throughout the film, and provided additional lift. It's a character in itself without which the film wouldn't be half as exciting or watchable, with rousing themes to stoke your expectations with its pomp. Their musical contribution and its importance cannot be more than overstated, and is a critical ingredient to why I had enjoyed this film so much to put it as a late consideration into one of the best this year has to offer.
Certain scenes stood out either as homage or influenced pieces, and perhaps you may disagree with me, but the nightclub scene with Gem the Siren (Beau Garrett) bringing our new protagonist Sam Flynn (Garrett Hedlund), the son of Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges returns to once again play two roles, that of Kevin Flynn the founder of Encom and his digital creation / avatar Clu) to meet Castor (played by Michael Sheen with flamboyant spunk) an information broker in the undergrounds of the digital Grid world, seems to have contained a whiff out of The Matrix Revolutions, with Persephone and Merovingian. But of course the Wachowskis didn't have Daft Punk to turn the tables, and parallels between the Matrix and the Grid cannot be more prominent given entities within are programs, with the ones gone rogue instilled with a desire to cross over to the real world.
Then there's something unmistakably Star Wars about it too, with the designs of attack space crafts zipping through the night sky, and clearly one of the many gorgeous costumes here can't seem to hold a candle to what looked like an awesome robe, simple as it is, but striking nonetheless. Or how about something which reminds one of Gotham City's caped crusader, with the Tumbler inspired getaway vehicle with large inflatable tyres played out in a scene right out of Tim Burton's first Batman movie with the long road back to the secret hideout within which to seek out answers to questions left silent en route.
So I may be stretching it, but there will be certain degrees of familiarity you'll find in some moments of the story, but I assure you the crux of it is a film that has deeper pathos, dealing with man's relentless pursuit for perfection and utopia, and the desire to play god if given a chance. Creations made in the image of is quite pronounced in a scene that stood out almost like Michelangelo's Creation of Adam, although here it's interpreted in the digital realm. Humans aren't perfect, so our creations in all likelihood will inherit some of our flaws, no matter if they happen to be digital and following certain fixed patterns and constructs. It's what being human is all about with our imperfection. The dramatic elements here between Father and Son is the film's strength to provide that emotional anchor and attachment making this a digital affair with plenty of soul, and the chemistry shared between Jeff Bridges and Garrett Hedlund make them quite the father and son pair up, with shades of how revered the former is within his own created realm, and the tremendous power that he still holds even if in exile.
Olivia Wilde provides for the token fashionista who is ever ready to flex her battle prowess with skills in various weapons - a lethal combination of The Matrix's Trinity equipped with Star Wars blades - and vehicles, whose background is given a superficial twist which seeks to expand the TRON universe a little bit more with miracle phenomenon being a natural occurrence once a perfect equilibrium is achieved. Fans will get to learn and understand this expanded universe a lot more as explanations get dished out in due course, even one that deals with the time in between the first and second films, of Kevin Flynn's obsession with his latest playground that his creation ultimately took over, turning it into an arena with its own brand of gladiatorial fights for entertainment. But there's enough material introduced without being overwhelming for the new Grid entrant, and opens up a lot more avenues for future storytellers.
Even for those days, I wasn't one of those who got instantly impressed by the effects of the time, but then again that's what made TRON stand out based on its uniqueness in look. It was way ahead with combining live action with computer generated graphics, and in the same fashion, the filmmakers here had done an admirable job prepping this film up for 3D. 3D may be the latest Hollywood fad that got people jumping onto its bandwagon, but just as how computer graphics has to be inherent in the first TRON movie, the updates of the franchise has to keep up with the times, and in true reel mimicking real life, The Grid pops up in more than 2 dimensions, starting with the light cycle wars that include an additional dimension to consider, which makes for some thrilling action, both on or under the ground and in the air, rather than just becoming a mere special effect.
But I had to admit my personal hook line and sinker to watch this film, is the soundtrack by Daft Punk. It stands out most definitely throughout the film, and provided additional lift. It's a character in itself without which the film wouldn't be half as exciting or watchable, with rousing themes to stoke your expectations with its pomp. Their musical contribution and its importance cannot be more than overstated, and is a critical ingredient to why I had enjoyed this film so much to put it as a late consideration into one of the best this year has to offer.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
