Fantastica Voyage

It's terrible to see a con artist get away with a crime and then get to do more crime and not only that but also defending them. This is what's wrong in this country, the episode should have ended with her given a big fine and lengthy prison sentence

"The end justifies the means " was the phrase I was thinking while watching this episode. People who tend to quote this phrase are sociopaths. The defendant doesn't even flinch before she lies to crowds of people to fulfil her fantasy. She doesn't think about the negative impact that she can cause to investors, future customers and her employees. She can rationalize her choices and behaviours for her gains. The prosecutor in this episode called out defendant's BS out loud and yet she got away with being sentenced. Bull mentions several times that this ambitious inventor truly believes what she does, thus she's not guilty. Is it though? What about Jean of Arc? What about Reverent Jones? Hitler? Stalin? To name a few? They seemed sincerely believed their "visions", does it make them innocent? NO! This logic which Bull supports is the biggest BS in this episode. What happened to Bull?