Collective (2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
68 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
expert investigative journalism
ferguson-619 November 2020
Greetings again from the darkness. You likely recall seeing the horrific video. It was 2015 when a fire swept through a Bucharest club where a band was performing live. Captured on a cell phone, the video shows the crowd desperately trying to escape through the main door. 27 people died that night and more than 100 others suffered injuries and burns. It was a terrible tragedy, and yet more tragedy unfolded over the next few weeks, and that's the beginning of the story told here by director Alexander Nanau.

As recovering patients filled the burn wards and Intensive Care Units at Romania's hospitals, something horrible began to happen. 37 more people died. These were not folks that were admitted with a life-threatening status, instead it was bacterial infections that were responsible. What is the one thing we take for granted at hospitals? Yes, cleanliness. As the media began to question this death spree, Romania's Health Minister, Nicolae Banicioiu, a Social Democrat, began boasting about the country's medical facilities. It's at this same time that Catalin Tolontan, the editor of "Sports Gazette", was investigating the cause of these deaths. What we witness is investigative journalism at its best ... in the midst of despicable actions by those people we should be able to trust.

Mr. Tolontan and his team slowly peel back the layers, and discover massive fraud and corruption. A whistleblower leads the reporters down a trail towards Hexi Pharma and its owner, Dan Condrea. Protests and social upheaval follow, as the current politicians continue to spew lies. When tests prove unsterile hospitals due to diluted disinfectants, and that patients were denied or delayed transfers to proper facilities in Vienna or Germany due to pride and greed, outrage ensues ... leading to the ouster of Banicioiu and others.

Former patients' rights activist Vlad Voiculescu is named temporary Health Minister, and he permits total transparency by allowing director Nanau unfettered access to meetings and phone calls. The camera follows as reforms are instituted and Tolontan's research continues. It's stated with deep regret that, "Our healthcare system is rotten", and "We doctors are no longer human life. We only care about money." As more corruption and deception is uncovered, it's clear this was all about money, rather than healthcare.

Nanau's film would be powerful and memorable and important if he had remained focused on the work by the new Health Minister and the journalists, but it's elevated to brilliance by his inclusion of pieces on burn victims, especially Tedy Ursuleanu. Her severe burns left her head scarred and took one of her hands, yet she refused to cower or hide ... choosing instead to be photographed for all to see. It's such an affecting segment, and one that our mind won't soon forget. This is the rare documentary that also works as a political thriller. Rather than talking heads and a stream of interviews, we are invited into the world of journalists and reformists looking to right the wrongs. It's tense and emotional, and the outrage felt at the end is quite unpleasant and will stick with you. Those behind the corruption are described as "a nest of unscrupulous mobsters", and we can't help but wonder what happened to medical ethics and human morals. We witness these stories as they unfold and there may not be a better tribute to the importance of investigative journalism.
76 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Harrowing experience, with some flaws, but necessary
siderite29 August 2021
This might appear to Western audiences as a great piece of investigative journalism, and it is, but for Romanians it is a terrible thing to see. It's not like we haven't all talked about the abysmal state of the medical system in the country, it's not like we don't know the level of corruption at every level, but to witness it unveiling before our eyes is extremely distressing and painful. What makes it worse is that it presents a young minister of Medicine as a political hero, when we know he actually succeeded nothing of what he set out to do and, off record, he was among the people accusing the whistleblower of being dishonest or mentally unstable.

And to top it all up, we know that from the time the investigation took place (2015) to the time the movie was released (2019) and to now (2021), nothing has changed in any meaningful way. The woman that blew the whistle on the terrible state of the Burn hospital in Bucharest still works there (no one else would hire her) and still has the same bosses, with a new improved manager who accuses her of doctoring the video of maggots crawling over a burn victim's wounds. None of the people responsible or even partially condemned have served any sentences (one was reelected as the mayor of a sector of the capital city Bucharest) as their cases are still stuck in the legal bureaucratic machine. And not much has changed in the expectations of regular people, either. They all know that in order to have any chance for a mediocre treatment they have to bribe the people involved and never expect any kindness or increase in quality other than maybe a prioritization of their case. The system is still there, unchanged, strangling us to death.

For me the documentary was doubly terrifying, once for being a Romanian that might some day be sent into the nightmarish "system" from which few survive unscathed (or alive) and once again for recognizing the failures of the system from the film in my own experience. And I am a corporate man, working for Western countries in large and well known organizations. The feeling that it's not just a budget thing, or a Romanian thing and that it is a global thing resulting from human nature itself it extremely depressing.

Is it a perfect film? No. Sometimes it shows the bias of the investigators, things like their political stance or comments about the face of some guy they investigate for fraud and corruption. But that makes it also feel more raw, more honest. The investigators are not paragons of virtue, they are people like you and me and they are trying their best to do their job. There is a lot lost in translation, too. The HBO English subtitles are sanitized and incomplete, failing to convey the frustration, anger and violence in the people involved. Ridiculously, there was no option for Romanian subtitles, which makes me wonder how exactly did they get the English ones. The pacing is also all over the place and one can understand how difficult it would have been for the film makers to edit material that was kind of one sided and it is pretty obvious that people behave slightly unnatural, knowing they are in front of cameras.

Bottom line: it is a raw painful experience to watch this film. There is no joy in it, no closure, just people trying to fight the system by revealing it to the world in all of its ugliness. And they lose. That's the ugly truth.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Open a Can of Worms...
Xstal29 December 2020
... and be overwhelmed by a machination of maggots. A jaw dropping, eye opening and almost unbelievable documentary focusing on the endemic and systemic corruption discovered by journalists after sixty four people died as a result of a nightclub fire in Bucharest 2015. Plumbing the depths of depravity, and continuing to reach deeper as each minute ticks by, you will feel for the people of Romania and the betrayal perpetrated against them by their elected officials and civil servants.
39 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A must see.
dor_tokyo_20075 March 2020
I see people here commenting that the movie was lame...that it is propaganda...that somehow ,somebody, profits from the tragedy....just please tell me how in the world you can profit from a tragedy by actually showing to the people that the system is wrong..the system is rigged by corrupt politicians and that was the cost. Some people really lack common sense . As far for the film it is a masterpiece from my point of view. It shows you just how corrupt our romanian medical system is and how it kills it's patients from the beginning and how, yet again,a good part of the blame is on the damn politicians. It is also another reason why it is so important to go and to vote in the upcoming elections .
157 out of 174 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
They got it right
c-tin25 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I lived in Bucharest while the events from the documentary were developing. I felt the collective sorrow of loosing young, beautiful and innocent people. I felt anger when it was prooved that the entire medical system was rotten. Events like these create collective wounds that are hard to heal. For weeks after the biocides scandal I barely could look fellow Romanians in the eye. We all had failed.

From my point of view, people that died in the Colectiv club fire are heroes. They paid with their lives for us to wake up as a nation and start questioning a lot of things. Their death overthrown a corrupt government, triggered buildings safety checks and changed legislation on the matter (rules for fire exits, housing capacity limits for venues, etc.), revealed a rotten medical system where people died of infections that were mainly a cause of using diluted biocides. Without this accident we might have lived, even today, without knowing about the rotten heltalthcare that burns huge funds and kills us silently.

Real change was happening for a short while, then the ones that were most accountable of the disastrous situation regained the elections.

It is a very tense and unveiling documentary. Romanians can find it also motivational when in doubt of going or not to vote.
82 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A must see
iulia_roman200220 February 2020
Colectiv is a movie about us all. A devastating movie who digs up and shows the rottenness in Romanian public health system. A movie worth seeing, a movie worth showing and a movie who incites to action. A movie that you see crying your heart out and with a knot in your throat. A movie that reminded me why we protested in the streets for several months, a movie about involvement and the neccesity to do something when things are not going in the right direction. "Cause the day the give in is the day we die."
69 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Someone save Romania!
vvoinea-4221422 March 2020
Excellent documentary. Unfortunately the medical system didn't change since then. God help us all...
58 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is why we need critical journalism!
maibritt-589-91870619 April 2021
I was shocked and horrified watching this documentary. The level of corruption and lack of humanity in a system that's supposed to be by and for the people is scary. Despite of the excellent journalistic work I've only given 7/10 stars because of the style and presentation. 95% of the focus was on the story, and even though that's obviously the most important thing, I missed a little more focus on storytelling. It seems a bit "raw" with little to no introduction of the people participating. It's a style choice to not have a narrator or narrating text during the documentary, but here I missed a little more presentation of the circumstances.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
No Oscar = must watch
Opmiyx26 April 2021
You should watch this especially because it did not get any Oscars! Seeing what movies get Oscars lately, I think that this should be the appropriate criteria: watch if no Oscars granted.

The drama is real, the struggle with corruption is real, the fire was real and the dead also real! When you watch this, you cannot believe everything you are seeing was real, you somehow want to believe that at least parts of it are made up! No, they are not and corruption does kill!

The end will leave you stunned, petrified and thinking how this society, any society, could be so ignorant!

Watch it, it will change a part of you!
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not powerful enough
ankadam19 March 2021
Though it might seem as a powerful documentary to people who are not familiar with Romania, I found this documentary not powerful enough. The wounds our society keeps bleeding from are way deeper than this film manages to show. But it is a good eye-opener, a necessary one. I really didn't like the focus on a limited set of people and the lack of perspective over the larger implications the Colectiv club fire had throughout. Very much missed one vital conclusion - since the film is made in 2019, 4 years after the tragedy - and that is: there were some changes but far from enough, far from what needed to be done, far from securing the safety for the people in Romania. Things have gotten quiet and tragedies keep happening, corruption is still there. And I think this is what the viewers needed to understand from this film but don't because it doesn't get there.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Chilling reminder of the underhanded dealings of modern politics
rannynm19 November 2020
An electrifying and groundbreaking documentary, Collective is a chilling reminder of the underhanded dealings of modern politics. Shot in a rigorously observational manner, Collective covers an event that took Eastern Europe by storm and led to massive big pharma and government reform.

On October 30, 2015, a deadly fire in Colectiv, a popular nightclub in Bucharest, Romania killed 64 and injured 146. Of the 64 killed, 38 died in the hospitals. Upon closer inspection, it was discovered they were in close contact with some of the most resistant hospital bacteria on the continent, which festered in their uncleansed wounds. In the first part of the film, Catalin Tolontan's journalistic crusade is detailed, as he embarks upon a journey to uncover the negligence, corruption and political machinations that plagues the Romanian health system as a whole. Vlad Voiculescu is introduced as the new minister of health, and he looks to take Romania in a new direction for health and safety but faces massive backlash. Watch Collective to find out how this crisis is solved.

A widely-known Romanian journalist at the Gazeta Sporturilor, Catalin Tolontan, together with Vlad Vioculescu, ex-minister of health and patients rights activist, are featured in Collective. Tolontan colleagues Mirela Neag and Razvan Lutac are captured in the newsroom, printing papers and delivering fiery questions at press conferences. I especially enjoyed their portion of the film, possibly due to my interest in journalism, but also because of Tolontan's unique approach to tackling this case - calculated vehemence. Even Voiculescu's segment is intriguing, albeit a little more morose and harder to follow. Honestly, you can't help but feel bad for Voiculescu, the one upstanding politician who cares for people more than for the money in his pocket, especially in the tense election scenes. Tedy Ursuleanu, a burn victim, is also featured in this film. Her story is not illustrated in great detail, but featuring her is, to me, a massively positive step for Nanau to take. It adds a whole new level of 'wow, this is real' to Collective.

The cinematography in this film is absolutely stunning; the camera team uses dimly lit, low contrast scenes to drive home the intensity of the incident and harshly lit closeups in telling the story of the people that Collective follows. The lack of ambient noise filtration in press conferences helps the viewer really jump into the story. Besides the plot, this has got to be my favorite part of the entire documentary.

Collective promotes freedom of speech, government transparency, and valuing lives over profit, which are all positive morals. There are political elements in this film as well as rather graphic scenes depicting burn victims, that you should be aware of. Also, there is some bad language and the whole plot is unsuitable for younger audiences. Nanau successfully calls viewers to action to speak out against corruption.

I give Collective 4.5 stars out of 5 and recommend it for ages 14 to 18, plus adults. Reviewed by Eshaan M., KIDS FIRST
44 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stunning You Are There expose
gortx16 March 2021
In 2015 a fire broke out in a Romanian nightclub (Collectiv) holding a hard rock concert. 26 people died on site, but, it was the 38 who died in hospitals that roiled the nation. Massive protests erupted and the government fell. A reporting team at the Gazette Sports journal lead by Catalin Tolontan continued to dig into the high casualty count in hospitals.

Director Alexander Nanau and his crew garnered the trust of the reporters and got almost unlimited access into their investigation. COLLECTIVE takes a you are there approach. It's step by step and that means that, yes, a lot of the "boring" stuff is left in. Still, it never feels either padded or unduly adulatory to the newspaper. And, what also propels the story is that new revelations and turns in public opinion worthy of a medical thriller keep occurring. The burn victims families and survivors get their due including a brave young woman, Tedy Ursuleanu, who models her scarred body for an art exhibit. A new Health Minister, Vlad Voiculescu, is installed to try and regain the trust of the Romanian public. Director Nanau also gained incredible access to the Minister.

It's amazing that the Collectiv scandal was blown open by a sports publication - imagine Watergate being revealed not by the Washington Post but by The Sporting News! The culture of bribery and corruption has been the topic of a number of fine Romanian feature films (including GRADUATION and THE DEATH OF MR. LAZARESCU) but the depth of how deeply it is ingrained in that society is still staggering*.

COLLECTIVE is a powerful documentary that gained world attention. It's extremely well detailed with Tolontan and the Gazette staff doing yeoman work. The Documentary loses a bit of focus as the attention turns more towards Minister Voiculescu and away from the reporters as they were the conduit through which the viewer has followed the scandal. This minor quibble aside, it's one of the finest movies of the year.

* After the completion of this documentary, a new, more reform minded coalition has again been voted into power. Vlad Voiculescu is again health minister
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good
atractiveeyes13 February 2021
Collective is Romania's official submission to the Oscars and it was shortlisted. It's a very good and important documentary. It sheds light on the aftermath of a tragedy that happened years back in Romania due to a corrupt government and health system. It is interesting to me with all the new and serious information it delivers but I can't say I truly enjoyed it. But I know it's in me, Im not a fan of documentaries, although it's interesting to me it is also boring, unnecessarily long and messy sometimes.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not so much about Colectiv
alexmjr17 December 2020
This documentary does not present as it should everything that happened there... how it happened, why it happened, etc .. It's a so-called documentary, which actually presents that terrible event in the Colectiv club where dozens of people died, but that's it.

Otherwise, the film is no longer about Colectiv, but about Catalin Tolontan (journalist), Vlad Voiculescu (politician) and his disappointment that someone else won the election and not who he wanted. Too little about what happened at the Colectiv.
26 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Honest review
vieriuieronim7 March 2020
This movie is not about Colectiv victims. It's about how journalists and politicians in Romania reacted after that sad event. It's basically structured in 2 big parts: the first one is about the work done by the journalists from GSP newspaper, Catalin Tolontan and his colleagues, and shows insights regarding investigation journalism., a field which was rather strange to me. The second part is about exminister Vlad Voiculescu and his efforts to diminuish corruption inside the health system.

This movie is also about the heroes that fight the system -the people that choose to speak publicly or anonimously about what is really going on in romanian hospitals. This movie hits you really hard, it shows you how corrupt a health system can be and what are the implications on a national level. And i strongly recommend seeing it in a cinema,just for the experience. Overall, not a 10/10 documentary, but a very good one.
38 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unbelievable dramatic and frustrating
cristina-ciupercovici6 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is the most incredible, dramatic and frustrating documentary of how the medical system from Romania , in fact the all system is corrupted from top to bottom, even though some people with integrity and high morals will try to change it, the time is too short and the generation is still not educated into adopting new rules and respecting the right of humans: the right to health. It is a must see movie, prepare to be surrounded by emotions of all types and captivated by the events that follow. Prepare to be shocked by the ending.
41 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unfortunately only reality ...
dann-578251 May 2021
The fact that all of this is reality. Unfortunately... A sports magazine that investigates in the place of who should do it. And then from here we understand that everything, how the system works in Romania.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why we leave, and why we hope
Radu_A24 December 2020
In 1990, right after the revolution, Romania had a population of 23 million and now it's down to 19 million, meaning that in 30 years it has declined 17.4%, the highest negative growth in Europe. This documentary gives you a very good idea why that is, but since it is edited like an action film, with no breaks between events, it's not only interesting to Romanians, but for everybody.

Starting out with the Sport Gazette's revelation of the Hexipharma scandal, which broke after many burn victims of the "Colectif" fire died from infections obtained in hospital, the film first focuses on the journalist breaking the case. Hexipharma was a company that diluted disinfectants to 10% and sold them at hiked prices to the health care sector, so patients got infected by surgical instruments. The film does not elaborate on the scandal about the club, which had no proper emergency exits (the reason why I never went clubbing in Bucharest). It just uses its name as a reference to the corruption network in politics.

Once the Socialist (i.e. ex-Communist) government resigned, a technocrat cabinet took over until the next elections, so the film focuses on new health minister Vlad Voiculescu's attempts to clean up corruption in the country's hospitals, which was met by a media hit job accusing him of trying to appoint foreigners and misappropriating funds - so the very things the Socialists were doing. They won the next election promising enormous tax breaks, after which the editors of Sport Gazette were threatened by ex-Intelligence to watch out for their families. It's a sobering reminder for us emigrants why we despair so much about our homeland, and a warning for those living in less corrupt countries how bad things can get if no one dares to oppose them.

The film ends on a bleak note, but in reality this scandal was the starting point of a huge protest movement. The leader of the Socialists Liviu Dragnea tried to overturn anti-corruption laws so that he could become Prime Minister (he had been legally convicted, so he was barred from office). This led to a veritable war between the Socialists and the Anticorruption Directorate, whose boss Laura Kövesi had hundreds of politicians and judges indicted until she was fired for abuse of power - she is now the EU's first Chief Prosecutor. That is the film I'm really waiting for. For years, often in winter, Romanians demonstrated against the government, and when Dragnea's final appeal was rejected, he was immediately jailed (he's still in prison). I hope we get to see that film one day, as it shows a different Romania in which change is possible because the people have had enough.
28 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A qualified only movie
zacharyzhou18 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Government corruption issues happened all around the world. It's just no news to me. And it's more like a Documentary type of movie but it nominates for The Best International Feature Film and I can't understand why. Anyway the movie ends without a clear solution which annoyed me so much.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
the fire that shook Romania
dromasca10 September 2020
Collective, the 2019 documentary film signed by Alexander Nanau addresses a serious topic. In the fire in the Bucharest nightclub 'Colectiv' which took place on October 30, 2015, 27 young people died. In the months that followed, another 37 of the wounded with severe burns died in hospitals in Romania and abroad. The deaths of many of them could have been avoided, as they were caused by the lack of capacity, hygiene and proper treatment conditions in hospitals, and by delays in transporting the wounded abroad. The scandal and the popular protests led to the fall of the ruling Social Democratic government and its replacement with a government made up mostly of technocrats, which led Romania for a year, until the parliamentary elections in December 2016. The filming team started from the press conferences after the fire and focused on two main issues: the investigation and the revelations of the journalists from 'Gazeta Sporturilor' led by Catalin Tolontan which brought to the public's attention serious details of incompetence and corruption in the hospitals system and with the providers of medical materials, and the work of the Minister of Health in the technocratic government and his team, who during their time in power tried to take a series of measures to eradicate corruption at all levels of the medical system. Politics being what it is, the 2016 elections brought the Social Democrats back to power.

The investigative reporting techniques are used professionally, the editing is alert and explains well the main moments of a tragedy that changed the Romanian political landscape for a while. The role of the combative media is excellently emphasized. I assume that for some of the foreign spectators some details will remain unclear. The fact that the investigation team belongs to a sports newspaper says something about the situation of the Romanian press. The technocratic minister of health in the film, Vlad Voiculescu, has since entered politics and is running today for the position of mayor of Bucharest. Reporters and politicians in the film are permanently watching television stations that not only inform but especially comment with visible political overtones. Can documentaries such as "collective" be an alternative to independent investigative journalism? Accompanying the teams of journalists and advisers to the ministers for 14 months, Alexander Nanau and his colleagues help us to get to know the main protagonists, journalists and politicians. In most cases, they manage to make the cameras unbiased and invisible. The voices of the victims are represented by the grieving parents and the young Tedy Ursuleanu, seriously injured in the fire, who will bear the sequels of her wounds for all her life.

I am not surprised by the international resonance of the film, because the problems of medical systems, including lack of equipment and capacity, as well as deeper such as corruption and political interests are increasingly evident in many countries, including the crisis caused by the COVID pandemic. 19. Starting from the Romanian realities, "collective" manages to tell a story with universal validity. The story being well told, the impact is remarkable.
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too Scandalous
Cineanalyst14 April 2021
"Collective," after last year's "Honeyland" (2019), is only the second picture to be nominated for both Best International Feature Film and Best Documentary Feature, and while both are striking in different ways, I thought both suffered from muddled, over-expansive narratives. This one covers outrageous political and public-health scandals in Romania. Interesting and even infuriating as it all is, the result is messy and overlong.

At the bookends of the picture, there's the grieving father of a son who died after a fire at the nightclub Colectiv in Bucharest, which lacked fire exits, and compounded by the Hexi Pharma fraud of diluted disinfectants in hospitals and bribery and general incompetence and cruelty involving hospital management--resulting in burn victims dying from infection and even being covered in maggots. The first part of the plot mostly follows a sports newspaper, of all media, who uncover much of this maleficence. This journalistic documentary take à la "All the President's Men" (1976) (or "Spotlight" (2015), for the younger reader) leads to the resignation of the nation's health minister, as well as the rest of the government, we're told, whereupon "Collective" refocuses mostly on the investigative and reform efforts of the new, technocratic minister and his subsequent losing of his job when the Social Democratic party regain control of the government after winning an election on a populist platform (by the way, as of this writing, he's back at the post). There's also a subplot involving a burn victim who models for a photographic exhibition.

Another comparison that comes to my mind is what I think the best documentary, at least from the U. S., of the season about a political and healthcare scandal, "Totally Under Control" (2020). Although I like the fly-on-the-wall observational approach of "Collective," the talking heads and TV clips of its American counterpart help to keep the focus on the political corruption and incompetence of its healthcare issue of the pandemic. Much of the observation of the Sports newspaper's work could've been cut here, especially the speculation at their meetings and their commentary regarding the supposed guilty appearance of the subjects they photograph from afar. Additionally, I like the reflexivity of the photographic exhibition here, but its veering towards fetishizing or sexualizing of the woman's scarring seems somewhat out of place. Compare that to the camera turning on itself in "Totally Under Control," which supports its pandemic narrative by exposing the precautions taken for filmmaking during this health crisis. Nevertheless, the subject matter and observational approach of "Collective" is so strong, that I'm still glad I saw it.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One step forward, two steps back
paul2001sw-131 March 2021
Poor building standards led to deadly consequences after fire broke out in a Romanian nightclub; poor hospital standards led to more deaths afterwards. A sports newspaper, bizarrely, broke the scandal. The first part of this documentary mostly follows the journalists and in truth, it's a little dull; people speak to them and they publish what they're told, but it's not very dramatic unless you know the background story. Things become more interesting when we get to follow a new, reformist Minister of Health. His problem is that his entire bureaucracy is corrupt; and sadly, in a land where the young have given up on politics, his war on them is doomed. It's this part of the film which is most gripping, sad, and necessary. It sometimes seems that Europe (and the rest of the world) is perpetually poised on the brink of rolling back progress; for those in Romania, it seems there is very something rotten in the state that even tragedy cannot remove.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Highly overrated mess
Remakeru17 March 2021
I think people are just being emotional when giving this a good rating because honestly it's a pretty bad "documentary": painstakingly slow and bad overall structure and story telling.
13 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest documentaries ever made.
MOscarbradley31 March 2021
This magnificent documentary, (a nominee for Best Documentary Feature and Best International Feature at this year's Oscars), is about as devastating as documentary films can get. In 2015 a fire destroyed the Bucharest club Colectiv; 27 people died at the scene and a further 37 died later in hospital, not from their burns but from infections picked up in the hospital. The reason? The disinfectants used in the hospital were diluted, sometimes up to ten times. Alexander Nanau's film sets out to explore the corruption endemic in the Romanian health system, (and the Government as a whole), by following the story, firstly as taken up by a team of journalists, and latterly by the newly appointed Health Minister who tried to reform the system, the existing Social Democratic Party having been forced to resign after a public outcry.

"Collective" is a film about investigative journalism that itself becomes a great piece of investigative journalism and it's a truly frightening expose of institutional corruption. As Nanau's camera moves between the journalists and the young Minister, he takes time to focus on one of the victims who, without bitterness, attempts to salvage her life in ways that might seem unimaginable. Otherwise he simply records events as they unfold. The heroes of the film clearly are Catalin Tolontan, the journalist who initiates the investigation, (and he was a sports writer) and Vlad Voiculescu, the Health Minister who goes up against the system from within. These are men who not only put their careers at risk but their lives; at one point it is suggested a leading figure may have been murdered to ensure his silence.

During the course of the film we learn that Romania had the worst record for hospital deaths in Europe and that almost certainly was down to the corrupt system in operation but watching this deeply disturbing film you might ask yourself could this happen elsewhere in supposedly civilised Europe. As one doctor in the film says, 'we are no longer human beings. We only think about money' and as the old saying goes, you couldn't make this up. "Collective" is the one essential film of the last twelve months.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must watch !
pruna-daniel11 September 2019
If you want to cry watch this great documentary .Everything start from coruption
26 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed