Slay the Dragon (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
highlighting an issue
ferguson-63 April 2020
Greetings again from the darkness. It's no wonder our faith in democracy is waning. The list of reasons and the targets to point fingers are both numerous. Heck, one of the last-standing Presidential hopefuls has spent most of his life believing and preaching that there is a better way. This documentary from co-directors Chris Durrance and Barak Goodman ensures gerrymandering remains on the list of reasons. They weave together three stories from Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin to demonstrate how a party can invoke a strategy of gerrymandering, and what the long-term impact can mean.

We've long understood the basics of gerrymandering. It is when one political party works to carve up the voting districts in order to benefit one party or handicap the other. The film educates us on the fine art of "packing" and "cracking." Packing involves concentrating the opposing party's voters into a few districts, while cracking involves spreading out (diluting) that party's voters amidst many districts. Both are designed to render opposition votes meaningless. We even learn how gerrymandering got its name ... a link to Elbridge Gerry, a former Governor of Massachusetts and Vice President to James Madison.

The "star" of the Michigan segment is Kate Fahey, and we see how her 2016 Facebook post led her directly into political activism, and the formation of "Voters Not Politicians" (VNP). Because she is so energetic and engaging, it's clear why the filmmakers devoted so much time to this segment. Ballot initiatives, petitions, speeches, interviews, the Michigan Supreme Court, and ultimately, voting day ... this is her journey and we get to come along for the ride.

North Carolina and Wisconsin offer more details on the fights against gerrymandering, but neither of these stories go quite as in-depth, although we do follow the Wisconsin case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, where Justice Kennedy's retirement changes everything. There is a very informative segment on the Republican's national strategy after Obama was elected. Survival of the party was in jeopardy, and behind-the-scenes strategists like Chris Jankowski and Tom Hoeffler were specialists brought in to focus on the best approach to re-districting across the country ... something called the Redmap Project.

There are a lot of moving parts included in the film by Durrance and Goodman: tracing the 2014 Flint water crises to the 2010 elections, insight into ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council), discussions of Lobbyists writing bills, details on voter suppression, and input from journalists, radio talk show hosts, political consultants, and attorneys. Author David Daley comments throughout with his opinions on specific examples of gerrymandering. The grass roots movement to end gerrymandering in Michigan was fascinating to watch, and there is mention that both parties have used gerrymandering to their advantage over the years. The difference makers these days are Big Data and Big Tech ... highly complex analytical tools that turn this into a science. "Independent committees" drawing district lines is offered as a solution, but if the last decade has taught us anything, it's that most everyone has an agenda and true independent thinkers are a rare breed. Whether calling this an "assault on Democracy" is accurate or not, it seems quite obvious that there must be a better way ... and a better way is needed.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A tough fight here in the US for democracy
rpabstnm2025 April 2020
A tough fight here in the US for democracy. Amazing how the Republicans fight - in Fussball they would see the red card
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Inspiring to watch, especially for those interested in social justice, politics and changing the world
rannynm8 May 2020
Slay the Dragon is an educational film that allowed me to learn more about gerrymandering. As someone who enjoys politics and social justice, I had an interesting experience with this movie. At the beginning of the movie, I knew little to nothing about gerrymandering. However, by the end, I knew quite a lot about this topic. I was educated, but I cannot say I was thoroughly entertained. It is hard to make a documentary film about gerrymandering that is fun and intriguing for the masses. Watching the film wasn't a tedious process, so there's that.

Slay the Dragon follows the story of a young woman, Katie Fahey living in Michigan, who decides to make a change by rallying a group together to create a proposition preventing gerrymandering in Michigan. Gerrymandering is the ability for politicians or powerful government officials to change state lines and districts in order to prevent certain candidates from winning votes from specific groups of people. Simultaneously, we learn about the history of gerrymandering and how it was used to create our current political climate. Gerrymandering was used by democrats in the 80s and now it's mainly used by Republican politicians. Throughout the course of the film, we see Katie's trials and tribulations as she continues to fight for what she believes in - helping make the voting process fair.

Slay the Dragon is an inspiring film to watch, especially as a young girl interested in social justice, politics, and changing the world through the process of lawmaking. Katie's journey was a rollercoaster and her passion is extremely admirable. It is satisfying to see her story play out in this documentary. People like Katie give me hope for the future and remind me that anyone is capable of making change, no matter how big or small. The film is also very well produced. The only negative aspect is that it didn't fully capture my attention all the time. A lot of the film showcases repetitive statistics. I understand that it is difficult to make a documentary of this nature. Although I was not fully captivated, I respect the hard work and effort put into making this film. I learned a lot about gerrymandering and feel inspired and reassured, so the filmmakers accomplished something positive.

Slay the Dragon is loaded with positive messages. I give it 3 out of 5 stars and recommend it for kids ages 12 to 18, due to some language.

Reviewed by Ella L., KIDS FIRST! reviewer
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worthwhile watch on important topic
elisaDuke19 April 2020
This movie presents compelling evidence for the importance of redistricting reform and unrigging the system. I started the movie not knowing much about the topic, and am convinced now that this is an area of vital importance for our country (and the future of our democracy).

For what it's worth, I voted for Romney in 2012 and lean moderate. I didn't think this documentary hits you over the head with partisanship. It was a fair look at a serious issue.
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Important subject, ignore the conservatives complaining
higgins-303721 April 2020
Gerrymandering has been used by both Liberal and Conservatives. But with the systematic taking of local and district elections across the country, conservatives have taken control of how districts are drawn to purposefully minimize Liberal voters. They have been funded by Super Pacs (I.e. Koch brothers) and have misused and abused the power of redistricting.Districts should be drawn and based on population and be as simple and as small as they can be. All registered voters should not be identified by any party when a district is drawn. They should not be drawn by any Political party.
29 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Voters not politicians
chaddooley21 April 2021
We'll put together documentary, gerrymandering has no place in a democracy. I wish they spent more time following the money and naming those responsible for the gerrymandering that resulted in electing Trump in 2020. Looking forward to seeing what there solution is and how redistricting will look in 2020 vs 2010. Maybe one day the majority of voters will finally have a say in who gets elected.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
important for every democracy...very leftie redman-made
ops-5253528 October 2020
In the world. well, as an innocent non -american citizen i get gobsmacked and deranged if not to say depressed to how american politics works out in practice. ''the vote'' has absolutely no value at all if this practice goes on,and you'll end up like paria-nations like north korea or china akan one-party-system and become part of the infamous axis-of-evil, an expression made allegedly by gop president dubaya bush..

if the election system isnt hard enough to understand this movement of electoral district to the house and senat makes it completely nuts. its a typical sign or symptom of the 1% society disease

i will not come up with solutions, other than that they should abolish the way they do it now. so to the voter not politicians movement, youve got my moral support.

i love this kind of documentaries that tells unfairness in a proper and understandable manner so i recommend a look at this, because im grumpy and old and a man
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Partisan Propaganda
rachelmayfield7 August 2020
DNC promo is all to see here! One sided not worth the watch. Gerrymandering is done by both Dems and Republicans but somehow they only featured Republican examples. This is a political film, not a documentary
16 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Important topic
moviefan202019 April 2020
This film provides a view into how democracy is being undermined in the United States, and follows different efforts to protect it. The movie does a good job describing the problem to a general audience, while still being interesting to watch. I felt inspired to get involved afterward.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Liberal fluff on Republican cheating, could be a comedy
joeyford-5534210 May 2020
An interesting movement to fight the GOP from redrawing voting districts as the Democrats have been doing for years. This show casts all the blame on the Republicans which is funny. To review, it doesn't discuss the Democrats push for mail in votes, vote harvesting, and no ID voting. The blue party is throwing mud at the red ... like a felon in maximum security yelling at a child for a misspelled word on a spelling bee. It talks about redistricting reform and unrigging the system. It is a great idea but interesting that now is the time this is important since the show itself says it has been going on since the first district lines were drawn a century ago.
14 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Documentary cherry picks data and effect in one sided way
random-7077811 March 2020
My state polls at about 53% Democrat 42% GOP in the last ten years on average. But 75% of the Representatives, and 100% of the Senators we sent to the US Congress and Senate are Democrats. The anti-gerrymandering proposed in this documentary would result in even more Democrat seats, which is to say even disenfranchisement of GOP voters. Like the other reviewer I have wonder why the documentary makers did not note that ranked choice voting would have given Donald Trump a larger margin of victory, and less GOP seats lost in the 2018 midterms? Actually ranked choice would have mean no president Kennedy and no President Clinton. Why is Georgia's representation unfair but the fact that both senators from Virginia are Democrats when that state cleanly averages 50% to 48%?
24 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An important coverage ruined by strong bias
tuukkaoksanen26 March 2021
I wanted to learn but instead I was fed an agenda. Sadly, an extremely important issue was ruined by the producer not getting past his bias. Documentaries should be about accuracy. The best documentaries reveal actual details of a character or event that you were not aware of, so you can learn. If you read the Wikipedia page on gerrymandering instead of watching this, you will save 90 minutes of your life. This documentary is ruined by the extreme bias of the authors. The documentary is supposed to be about gerrymandering but it's really about the "evil republicans". They take 20 seconds to say "democrats did the same thing in California to gain control of the state forever but let's not talk about it" and then move on to the evil republicans they wanted to discuss. This is why the country is divided. Because even our coverage of true events can't be neutral.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Erects untrue premises
random-7077820 November 2019
Consider this, California, the largest state in the Union, has a 45:7 ratio of Democrat dominance in its US Congressional Representatives. That's 6.4:1 or about 84% elected members of Congress being Democrats. Within the state assembly, Republican voters are also under represented,with assembly members being 60:18. That is a serious under representation of Republican voters when compared to all polling and statewide office election results. ALL California electoral college votes go to Democrat presidential candidates the six Presidential elections. Yet this gigantic and artificially imposed Democrat advantage in election results, over representation of Democrats compared to popular vote received in the state, is not "gerrymandering" by the criteria used by the frankly and obviously partisan and makers of this 'documentary".

Oh and in fact several of this "documentary" producers (read funders) are Democrat party contributors. Hmm. This is not a documentary, but a partisan polemic, one that deploys a half dozen major logical fallacies. As far as ranked choice voting, or better yet runoffs, why not mention that the data clearly show that would have resulted in a certainty of a 2016 Trump win as well (given the studies showing that libertarians draw 85% from GOP and Greens draw 83% from Dems, and there were a lot more libertarian votes than greens), and would likely have resulting in Bill Clinton losing.
30 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Review
catpantry15 April 2020
It seems everyone was trying to be a president in their own way in this. While the president lays on a large bed, everyone stays there in their own minds. A trucker (roker) blasts his music in a trench. Climbs out and runs a mile in the street. Suddenly he wonders if he's a nice person (something the president does not have to do). And then roker (a dreamer) dreams that he gets lost but doesnt have to care.
2 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed