Give Me Your Hand (2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Better than I could've hoped
AyanaH5 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't expect much going into this movie. I found it on a list of "gay" films and when I got my copy, I did a little flip through like I always do to make sure that it was good and as a result stumbled upon the solicitation scene. I'm not into incest personally but I have seen a few films where the topic was handled delicately and beautifully so I have an open mind towards the genre if nothing else. This is NOT a gay film, however. Still, I was intrigued by the twins. They're very striking in a non-classical kind of way.

The overall premise of the film is that the boys ran away from their father's home in France to attend the funeral of their mother who lived in Spain and whom they had no relationship with. The film follows them on their journey. As other reviewers have pointed out, what dialogue there is is minimal but I don't think the film suffers as a result. If anything, it builds the tension because something is almost always just around the corner. Usually a fight because we see within the first few minutes that the boys have a very combative relationship, a juxtaposition of the sweet relationship implied in the animated short at the very beginning of the film.

As I watched, I started thinking of them as the "good" twin and the "evil" twin but truly, the good one isn't without his own faults and the evil one isn't that evil. Well...at first, anyway. It becomes obvious early on that the "evil" one, Antoine who bears a scar to make him that much more sinister looking, was the more dominant of the two and Quentin, the "good" one, was used to him handling matters and taking care of him. We see Quentin whining about being hungry and also getting a piggy-back ride from Antoine when he didn't feel like walking. Those scenes cement the nature of their relationship and the differences in their personalities. However, things change whenever someone new comes into the picture and it's interesting that on two occasions, first with the girl from the gas station and later on at the farm, Antoine finds himself on the outside looking in, literally spying on Quentin as he has sex. There's no actual incest in the film and no confirmation of sexual desire on either of their parts but the possessiveness that Antoine exhibits towards Quentin marks him as his own just as plainly as if he were his lover. In fact, his anger and jealousy spur him to do something that ultimately leads to their separation.

I consider this film a study in human behaviour, specifically relationships and how you can love someone and hate them at the same time, knowing that they're poison and no good for you but you still need them all the same. It's "you can't live with them but you can't live without them" at its very core and I appreciate that it's not a stereotypical romantic pairing, though it still comes across that way to an extent.

It's not a perfect film by any means but it's not a terrible way to spend 76 minutes. The scenery is beautiful and the action, when it comes, is gripping. My biggest complaint is that I would've liked more backstory into their estrangement from their mother and I wish they'd shown what happened to Quentin after he ran off. The film is primarily seen through Antoine's POV and once Quentin runs away from his would-be rapist, we don't see him again until the funeral, which left me with some questions that we never got any answers to because the film ended 10 minutes later. How did he make it to the funeral when he left all of his possessions behind?

The twins were brilliant in their portrayals, though. They did an excellent job of establishing the polarities in the twins' personalities. I couldn't have asked for more from them.

Overall I enjoyed it, even wished it was longer if only because I wanted more Quentin and his silent brooding.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Bland Mime
ZanderZion15 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The story of Twin brothers whom decided to visit their unknown mother funeral without the consent of their father and so they elope and on their adventure they encounter a lot of life learning situation. They are twins and are brothers, they trust and love each other. But their adventure lead them to learn the differences between the two of them, the differences that fractured their relationship as siblings. The movie could be entirely improve but then the whole screenplay for me it becomes a bland mime. Most of the scene are understandable by gestures, no lines, no words. But the silence becomes too much that some scene becomes a question. Examples are; The sex scene between Quentin and the farm lad it never explains if Quentin is gay or what?, How Quentin escape from the man whom paid Antoine 100 euros?, how did he reach the cemetery first before Antoine? The woman who rescued Antoine whom abused him? What was clear to me is at the end scene, they were reunited at last but their relationship has been damage already. They fought to relieve their hatred with each other but then Antoine drowned. The cries of Quentin in fear to lost his brother means compassion that whatsoever at the end they are still brothers and love still remains. When Antoine was relieve Quentin stands up, turn around and leave Antoine alone which means departure. Their experiences in their venture shaped them to be man on their own. And the end scene it emphasizes that the two of them at the end will have to live a separate lives.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Brotherly Love"
trmac-2923416 November 2023
Thankful for this film because I am now aware of the existence of Alexander and Victor Carril. They're so cute! Major heartthrobs.

Overall, I liked the film for the most part, but there were definitely some weird parts. I spent the first 15 min confused and trying to establish what the objective of this movie was because all that had been shown up to that point was a pair of twins running away from a bakery and aimlessly hiking out in the wilderness to some unknown destination. More dialogue would've been useful, not just in the beginning, but throughout the whole film. It's a disturbing thought to think about how the rando gas station chick slept with both brothers, in the same day, (presumably) without bathing in-between. There were a few sweet moments of brotherly love where you could tell the twins really cared about one another despite the constant back-and-forth. However, those moments were brief and fleeting once you remember one of the brothers is homophobic and pimped out his brother for 100 euros before abandoning him in a public restroom where he was almost sexually assaulted. That kind of "brotherly love" makes me glad I only have sisters 👀😅
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"My brother is what he is"
atlantis200616 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Antoine and Quentin are twin brothers. They're both young, determined and stubborn. Planning to assist to their mother's funeral, they embark on a journey to Spain. Hitchhiking, walking, illegally breaking their way into cargo trains, their trip becomes longer and harder than expected.

Antoine, however, manages to find some pleasure thanks to the girls he finds on the road. Sexual intercourse seems to be Antoine's privilege, as Quentin remains isolated and totally immersed in his drawings. Even so, the twin brothers seem to share a special bond. Closeness and intimacy, at first, seem to come natural to them.

They almost embody the idealized brotherly relationship as seen in Sophocles Antigone. Antoine and Quentin are 'autadelphos' to the extreme, not only have they shared the mother's womb but they also share every physical trait, identical to one another in physical appearance they are completely different in everything else. According to Saussure's linguistics, these brothers would only be able to articulate themselves into the symbolic order by functioning as mutually supplementary properties. Here the signifier (the body) is the same, but the signified (the personality) is completely different.

The hardships of the excursion take a toll on the brother's already strained relationship. But even after constant fighting, they agree on working in a farm the necessary days to pay for a train ticket to Spain. One night, Quentin finds in the fields a young man that looks very interested in him. They go skinny dipping and afterwards they have sex in the middle of the woods. Antoine, worried about his brother's absence goes out looking for him and finds him naked with the other boy.

With a mindset conquered by the heterosexual normativity, Antoine is unable to cope with the fact that his brother is homosexual. In the classic Greek tragedy, Antigone confirms that she loves her brother despise he was a traitor to Thebes, she reaffirms "My brother is what he is", and she loves him even more than life itself. He is what he is. And she accepts him for it. Antoine, however, cannot accept homosexuality, he can't see his brother as he is. And so, a few hours after the fateful encounter, he betrays his brother.

While eating in town, a man approaches Antoine, trying to seduce him. He quickly tells the man that for 100 euros he can have his brother, who is already waiting in the bathroom. The man pays and goes into the bathroom, and abusively tries to undress Quentin, who defends as best as he can. Antoine leaves the place and returns afterwards, only to find his brother's backpack on the bathroom's floor. He is nowhere to be found and it's only then when Antoine realizes what he has done.

Relationships amongst brothers are always complicated, there is much love and hate, constant conflicts, but usually nothing escalates as dangerously as it happens in Pascal-Alex Vincent's film. Antoine has a ghastly nightmare: he sees Quentin covered in blood. He starts feeling guilty, and he starts remembering other occasions in which he had purposefully neglected his brother.

He has but one choice: to keep traveling to Spain. Just before reaching his mother's town, he runs into Angel, a young man that tries to help him (curiously, Angel is played by Fernando Ramallo, famous for his interpretation of a gay teenager in Krampack); finally he arrives on time for the memorial. It's only fitting that the possibility of the brother's death is bound to the mother's funeral. It all boils down to Lacan's symbolic death. The burial place is the first symbol in which humanity can reorganize itself. Animals live and die anonymously, so to speak. For humans, unity and irreplaceability must be protected and remembered through language, that's why we speak of the dead, why we erect monuments and place tombstones, thus creating what Lacan called "a second death" that pertains to the order of the symbolic.

The final scenes of "Donne-moi la main" are unforgettable because of the lack of communication, loneliness and true desperation that the director transmits with strong images. At the beginning of the film, we had two brothers trusting in each other, sharing their frustrations and joys, expressing their feelings not through conventional language but rather through gestures, physical contact, silences and movement. At the end of the film all that remains is bereft, loss, rage and violence.
35 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Brother's Keeper
jeroduptown9 March 2022
2 twins traveling to their mom's funeral are so close they resent almost every move of the other. Sibling rivalry that almost ends with horseplay in the ocean.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Could have been great.....
so_cold1 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Good points about this film: This film had the potential to be fantastic. It has a good central theme, dealing with people's fascination with identical twins. This film could have taken the viewer on a journey, inviting people to find out what it's like for two people to be seen as different because they look exactly the same. Not so good points: it doesn't have a plot. It's just two twins arguing and bed-hopping until they get to their destination. The only interesting relationship in the film is cut short. The ending is furious and rushed, and it seems like it was thrown in there as a last ditch effort to create tension. With more intriguing dilemmas used, this film could have been a lot better.
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Subtle and moving
countergundlach10 February 2011
This movie made a very strong impression on me. It amazed me to see the other reviewer smashing it to smithereens. Clearly he/she did not get the point of the movie: the strange bond of twins, jealousy, betrayal. I found it profoundly moving and deeply sad. I highly recommend it for those who are interested in character development and not a splashy trashy film. The two brothers were extremely well played; the violence between the two of them seemed to indicate an unspoken attraction between the two of them. What is interesting that until it is made clear that the two are brothers, one could easily assume that they are lovers. The people they encounter on their journey serve only as catalysts to reinforce the depth of their strange bond.
38 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poor Writing
Kenny_Chisholm2 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
While I agree that the film was shot beautifully, and the acting was decent I was left disappointed by the writing.

The synopsis had us believing that something poignant must have happened during the twins' journey to their mother's funeral resulting in a significant impact on their lives but I didn't get any of that while watching the movie.

The series of events that occurred during their journey, mostly sex with strangers didn't have any real purpose to them. They were there merely to fill up the minutes and perhaps to sell the movie using the twins' good looks. The only piece of solid writing came when one of the brothers attempted to pimp his twin out resulting in them parting ways for the rest of their journey. I was hoping for the remorse he felt afterwards to be the climax of the movie but the resolution, if you can call it that was rather tame and insignificant.

There was little character development during the entire film. At the end, the two characters are exactly as they were when the film first began resulting in me having to echo the other reviewer's view of this movie as a "waste of time".
8 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Grandma laughs often. Do you think she is always happy?
adamsoch-121 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"Two kids from a garden" as the chanson is telling us, sung by the remarkable Colette Magny (1963), are set to go into the world on a sentimental and mysterious journey in hopes to be at their mother's funeral, mother they never knew. The mixed and surprising characters they come across and interact with are absolutely fantastic.

Antoine and Quentin the handsome twins could not look more alike and be as different as day and night. They are used to people come and go into their lives bringing joy and pain. "Where are you going?" one of the twins asked, but there was no answer, she just kept walking away, it was the natural thing to do.

Life is a bunch of chances, "Que Sera, Sera" (Whatever Will Be, Will Be) and we are riding along this amazingly written, directed and acted independent film. The images are beautiful the soundtrack is hunting and the very close brothers are astounding. You don't want them to hurt each other or be separated, but they do and we care. They communicate through feelings and deep emotions, they sense each other even if they are not together. I wanted the film to keep going and going, to go across the universe and back, I would have never gotten tired riding along.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of time
ja-16023 August 2010
I was very disappointed with this movie. After reading the information about it, it sounded interesting but the movie is very slow moving and only has roughly 20 lines of dialog in the whole movie! The director spends way too much time showing the boys walking down a road, walking through a forest, walking through a field, walking, walking, walking. If you ever wanted to see a movie that shows people walking, this one's for you. Otherwise, I considered it a waste of my time. Aside from a few scenes where they have sex with people they come across on the road, there is very little character development because as previously mentioned, there isn't much dialog. And don't expect to make any more sense out of them at the end of the movie - nope, it just ends without any type of resolution.
19 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting and inspirational
spacro14 July 2011
This movie is not about the road trip. You may also think it's boring because they don't speak too much, but I think it's great movie. It's about the love between brothers. It's very complicated love because they are twins, they are somehow together apart. Two different persons but they are one. They can't share everything, it's impossible and cause of that they are jealous on each other. On the other hand they are different and they somehow need to cooperate. I can't explain it, you must watch movie. I found it very interesting. You may think that love is simple, but it's not. With love comes hate and the other way around. It makes you think about that.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boooooooooring
charlie-byron23 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with the "could have been great" crowd. Yes it was beautifully shot, and the brothers were appealing and plausible. To me the problem was the movie tried to convey its entire meaning visually, almost without dialog. All we got was one lingering shot after another of smoldering looks between the twins.

Maybe some people were able to intuit what all these silent visuals were intended to convey. Or they were happy to imagine it. But I had zero empathy for the characters because I had no idea who they were. By the second half I couldn't care less what happened to them.

My other criticism is there were these strange unexplained scenes - the woman who helps Antoine for example. No dialog in the whole scene, including the sex, if you can call it that, so I sat there wondering what grand symbolism I was missing.

Altogether an odd, unsuccessful film.
7 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst movie
Drnona7730 April 2022
The worst movie in the world There's No one romantic scene, also the actors are not handsomes I'm sorry . I'm really disappointed of it I lost my time when I watched it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you love to watch people walk; this is the movie for you!!
JJ-Chi20 February 2021
MISSED OPPORTUNITY!! This could have been a wonderfully meaningful and emotional film. You have good-looking leads (who do an admirable job) and some quality moments ...along with a compelling message that "Blood is NOT thicker than water." But wading through the clutter and poorly structured film wears you down. In the end, you simply want to walk away.

After a couple of days, when someone asked me, "What was the film about?" All I could really say "it was about two boys walking."

My advice; if you wish to watch this film: "Fast Forward" as soon as the walking begins. You will save an hour and NOT MISS A THING!!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed