Here's what I think the plot is: Victor Karlstein, a scientist who runs a medial institute, is trying to save the life of his girlfriend using questionable medical experiments and organs from questionable sources. He also, apparently, has a hobby of making robotic monsters who like to fetch the organs for him. Will he save his girlfriend's life? Or will the inspectors catch him first?
John R. Hand is the writer and director of this very unusual piece. It reminds me greatly of a film I watched back in 1998 called "Red Eyes" and starring one of the guys from the Violent Femmes. (I may be slightly off on that, as I have been unable to find any record of such a film since.) The filming is very grainy, the angles are very strange even for the MySpace era, and I get the feeling this was the kind of thing art houses would show in the 1960s. The music, for what it's worth, is very good.
The film has received some very poor reviews and some very low ratings, but I actually feel compelled to defend Hand. While much of this film is bad and for many people unwatchable, I think at least some of this comes from a misunderstanding: what I (and others) thought was going to be a horror film is really an art film disguised as a horror film. Sort of like "Slaughtered Vomit Dolls" without the slaughter and vomit. Which one of these two films is more palatable is hard to say.
I also have to give Hand credit for including an audio commentary on this DVD, despite clearly being a very low budget production. I need to hear the audio commentary to really fully grasp this film. Maybe I'll like it more, maybe less once I understand how to view this. I am a horror critic, not an art critic. And while the horror (an unusual monster sex scene and some stringy organs) is just alright, the art levels seem very potentially amazing. The only scene I really enjoyed is when the doctor's girlfriend's sister shows up... but you'll have to wait an hour for that, so be prepared.
So, I'm leaving my review in the middle for now -- neither good or bad. Another reviewer says the film "fails so miserably on every level" and reduces it to "schlock". I disagree. Surely, this film would make people walk out of theaters, leave your party or at the very best have your friends fall asleep. This isn't going to win anyone over, so don't try to use it for that purpose (unless you're dating an art snob maybe). But there's something about this film that seems like something grander was going on, I just don't know what it was.