Ghosts of Girlfriends Past (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
114 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
I really enjoyed it!
james21196713 May 2009
I payed my money and saw this movie expecting a laugh and to leave with a smile on my face. I wasn't expecting Oscar acting, a great storyline or something that would leave a lasting impression on me.

The performances were good, I especially enjoyed Michael Douglas's glam OTT character. The main actors also impressed and I was drawn into their romance as the film went on. So much so that I shed a little tear at the end.

When I left the cinema I was smiling and during the movie I laughed out loud along

with many other people. I got what I paid for and had a good night.
118 out of 166 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not all bad
Kingslaay1 October 2021
Matthew McConaughey does an alright job at carrying this film. Some decent music as well and does of humour. It's an interesting concept throughout the film but the end always seemed predictable.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
5.8? Lot of stuck up reviews here
ayamizumi28 December 2021
So is it an original concept? Of course not! But nothing is anymore in Hollywood. They've all been done. A talking mouse, dozens of them. A movie with a turd in it. So get real! The story is all right and the movie has heart felt moments. It's an above average rom-com. 5.8?...go do your own movie so everyone else can shoot it to smithereens.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nont quite rom-com
JohnDeSando4 May 2009
For a rom-com, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past is as dramatic as it could be, more Dickens than Apatow. Matthew McConaughey as womanizer Connor Mead is type cast as a rake waiting to be changed into a loving human being, The plot with returning dead lovers to teach him a lesson about having feelings is not quite as exotic as it sounds, for it is a device mainly to show him as a callow youth squiring and losing the love of his life, Jenny Perotti (Jennifer Garner). The drama is the disaster he makes of his brother's wedding and the tears he witnesses from the women he has seduced and left.

Since we all know enjoying casual sex is a no-no for descendants of Puritans, the outcome of the ghostly apparitions' lessons is secure in cliché land. Following the party line about scoundrels getting what they deserve is ghost of Uncle Wayne, a sort of Gordon Gekko gone good, an oily ex-Lothario played with relish by another spot-on bit of casting, Michael Douglas. His flowing hair and Hollywood-tinted big glasses call to mind producer Robert Evans (The Kid Stays in the Picture). Although Uncle Wayne is a recovered womanizer, at least for now, his speeches about loneliness and broken hearts ring true only for the moment, but long enough to affect the hero.

It's an enjoyable film with a smart cast, a preposterous story but a serious message about true love and selflessness. Not quite a romantic comedy, but very close indeed.
51 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Nutshell Review: Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
DICK STEEL13 June 2009
For those who have played the field and sown some wild oats around town, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past might be a walk down a personal memory lane into why nothing lasts longer than possibly that first, genuine relationship. There are reasons abound why some are either commitment freaks, or just plainly wanting to chalk up a list of conquests to show off, and for top fashion photographer Connor Meat, erm I mean Mead (Matthew McConaughey), it's a run from responsibility, and the fear of never ever wanting to be hurt again.

I'm pretty sure many who have gone through a break-up would admit to having it leave some bad aftertaste, that you'd just want the upper hand the next time around when dealing with that painful, negative emotion, should and if it happens. Call it insurance, or the hardening of the heart, and if you're to subscribe to the tips shared in this film, it's preaching to love a little less if you're to walk away unscathed. This does not apply to those who are for the notion of true love, happiness and that institution called Marriage, and for a film whose protagonist celebrates and actually enjoys his freedom and singlehood, it ends with a cop-out smack in the face.

The trailer would have pretty much shown everything you need to know about the plot. For the ultimate swinger in Connor, nothing is worse than having to attend the wedding of his brother Paul (Breckin Meyer) as his best man, to toast during a ceremony he won't touch with a ten foot pole. Making it worse of course is the attendance of the only girl he has ever had genuine feelings for, his childhood and first girlfriend Jenny Perotti (Jennifer Garner). Then comes the whole shebang of A Christmas Carol proportions where Connor is visited by his dead uncle, Wayne (Michael Douglas), responsible for imparting his techniques to getting laid, who tells him that he'll be visited by three ghosts before the night is up. And for the home run, it's a determination if Connor would become a changed person and end up with the girl of his dreams (the future ghost did look hot though).

Those expecting comedy, you'll be disappointed as the jokes come off rather half-baked, making fun of best mens as nerds and bridesmaids who are horny all the time. Then there's the future father-in-law in war veteran Sergeant Volkom (Robert Forster) and his ex-wife Vonda (Anne Archer) whom Connor tries to hit (no women too young or old it seems). Those in for romance, unfortunately both McConaughey and Garner exhibit no sparks nor chemistry, perhaps the latter being all settled already as a real mom, that she's miscast as the mid-30-something still out there looking for love, and holding a candle for her childhood friend.

Director Mark Waters would be an old hand at handling ghostly apparitions in a romantic comedy, after all he had dealt with Resse Whiterspoon and Mark Ruffalo in Just Like Heaven. But his only saving grace in this movie with little surprises, is that of Michael Douglas' performance as the old-swinger Uncle Wayne, hamming it up as the adult version of Will Smith's Hitch, but with some pluses in not just wanting to establish that first hello, but going all the way for that one night stand, sharing some tips and tricks that you probably might just get lucky with.

Ghosts of Girlfriends Past turns out to be a misnomer, as Emma Stone gets to represent the countless of faceless, nameless women that Connor gets down with. As a date movie it's pretty formula, made worse by its taking a leaf from A Christmas Carol. The only element that kept me entertained, was the blast from the past moments complete with an excellent soundtrack to bring back those 80s and 90s nostalgia. See if you can spot the track 6 Underground by The Sneaker Pimps, and Time After Time by Cyndi Lauper, amongst others.
23 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Funny Version of A Christmas Carol and Scrooge
claudio_carvalho7 March 2011
The successful fashion photographer Connor Mead (Matthew McConaughey) is a womanizer without feelings that has casual sex with every possible woman and worships his deceased wolf Uncle Wayne (Michael Douglas). The bachelor Connor travels to Massachusetts to be the best man of his younger brother Paul (Breckin Meyer) on the night before the wedding for the rehearsal. However, he tries to convince Paul to call off the wedding with Sandra (Lacey Chabert). The maid of honor Jenny Perotti (Jennifer Garner) was Connor's sweetheart when he was a teenager and he still likes her. When Connor is visited by the ghost of Uncle Wayne, he advises that Connor's life is completely wrong and he will be visited by the ghosts of his girlfriends from the past, the present and the future along the night. Connor is haunted by the ghosts; learns the causes and consequences of his attitude toward women and reevaluates his life.

"Ghosts of my Girlfriends Past" is a funny and entertaining version of Charles Dickens "A Christmas Carol" and "Scrooge", with feelings and love replacing greed and money. Jennifer Garner is amazingly gorgeous and the close of her face in the last scene is mesmerizing. Matthew McConaughey is hilarious in the role of a cynical bachelor and shows a great chemistry with Jennifer Garner. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Minhas Adoráveis Ex-Namoradas" ("My Lovely Ex- Girlfriends")
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Totally unexpectedly great!
bball_player_302 May 2009
Going into this movie I wasn't quite sure what I was expecting. The trailer looked like a mediocre version of Scrooge and personally I am not a fan of Jennifer Garner. The plot was predictable and the end was of course cheesy, but with these types of movies, you don't watch them for the plot's predictability or cheese factor. You know in the end, the guy will get the girl, so it's not really a shock. You're more there to watch a) McConaughey being shirtless and b) the journey it takes for the characters to get there which in this movie is quite a little funny one. But I must admit despite Garner's performance and the plot's unoriginality, after coming out of the theatre, I was very impressed overall with the movie.

Although McConaughey and Garner's chemistry was lacking and did not seem very convincing, the supporting cast really made the movie a success. I think it's safe to say that Emma Stone (who plays the ghost of girlfriend's past) is going to have a bright future in the movie industry. She was hilariously witty and kept the movie light and fun. She was a major comic relief to the horrible scenes of Garner and McConaughey. Michael Douglas (who plays Uncle Wayne) also drops in for some comic relief and does again quite a good job. I didn't understand the "Dutch" nickname thing, but it wasn't overall important. Lacy Chabert (who plays Sandra) is a complete nut case bridezilla and although you have to sometimes be like "what the heck?" you have to laugh at her insanity. Bridesmaids and ushers were nothing really special and just were there as place holders, but I got a laugh out of the one usher who reminded me of an older McLovin' just by appearance.

It was a bit strange seeing the same girl playing the younger version of Garner's character in 13 Going on 30 and in Ghosts of Girlfriend's past (and both characters' names are similar: Jenna and Jenny). I guess they really liked her for the role the first time around, so why not make her play the younger version of Garner again (with similar horrible 80's clothes).

Overall, I thought this movie was a great movie you can sit down with friends and just thoroughly enjoy a good laugh. Don't expect too much romance with the unbearable chemistry between the two leads, but enjoy the supporting cast and what they have to offer.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A New Breed Of Film!!! The Dark Romantic Comedy.
Seifer0067 May 2009
When I initially went into the theater I was really excited about seeing this movie, I love Jennifer Garner, I think she is a very underrated actress. So as the movie began I was a little bit disappointed by the 15-20min mar, however after that the movie really picked up. If you are watching this movie stick with it it does get better.

The story does take a little to get into but when it does, it is very good, not what I expected. The story is incredibly cynical which is unlike most chick flicks. I love the odd romantic comedy here and there but sometimes its a little too Hollywood. I feel as though this movie was refreshing and I understand that there will be a lot of people that disagree with me but I thoroughly enjoyed this film.
31 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Simple, plain and corny
barrys821 June 2009
Ghosts of Girlfriends past is the typical movie about a man in love with his all-time girl friend but he can't accept it and becomes the man that scores with all the women and dumps them the day after. A weird adaptation to Charles Dickens A Christmas Carol, I don't know if he'll be pleased to see what these people did to his novel. Its a romantic comedy that can take you away a few laughs. The idea of a story like this was interesting but they turn it to a very corny movie with a poor plot. The cast is good, the performances not so much, Matthew McConaughey is good but unfortunately he is repeating the same role over and over and its beginning to bore, Michael Douglas is great and so funny but I think he is being wasted with so little participation and Jennifer Garner is convincing enough in her role as Jenny Perotti. But not everything is bad, for example, the locations are great, the landscapes are beautiful. And I like the soundtrack, the 80's music is very cool. In conclusion, it is entertaining and enjoyable but not for a movie theater, please wait for it until it is on DVD.
21 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Underrated
andres_ge881 June 2020
This movie has a great story line, less than 6/10 seems kind of unfair. Michael Douglas did an amazing job as Uncle Wayne, and is constantly cited by my friend for his wits. I think most of Jennifer Garner's movies are underrated actually. Fools Gold with Mathew and Daredevil with Jennifer Garner are also pretty underrated also.
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated !
dannykodwani11 August 2021
Its a good story line but only thing is that it revolves around just one subject hence gets a little boring but thats the whole point of the movie. The emotions expressed by Mathew and Jennifer are unparalleled. Worth a watch though.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stingy Reviewers
johnharapa7 June 2021
While this won't win any major awards, HELL, it won't ANY AWARDS, however it's very very easy to watch.

Cast does this flick justice, and while the addition of Douglas is a nice touch, the heavy lifting is done by McConaughey and Garner.

Enjoyed thoroughly. Watch it!!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable and fun.
insomniac_rod10 December 2010
I have to admit that I had a very good time with this one. I didn't expect much but it served for my Sunday's hunger for mindless entertainment/comedy.

I don't like Matthew M. Can't stand the guy nor his accent but still his performance makes the movie funny. Jennifer Garner is as hot as always and is the perfect support.

The high budget of the movie throws funny moments, great atmosphere (loved the 80's settings!), and good punch-lines.

I really like Emma Stone's performance.

To be honest I liked the movie very much because I'm a ladies man. Watching it made me think about my almost null capacity to get into a serious relationship.

Funny and entertaining.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of decent film stock
io_sono22 May 2009
I'm not a fan of rom-coms but the idea of a Lothario who meets his match in a Dickensian scenario sounded intriguing. Sadly, that was a mistake.

It took all of ten minutes to reach the point where viewing further would seem like a waste of one's life. The Connor Mead character is unbelievably trite and unlovable and the fact that pretty girls want to swoon all over him is an insult to women everywhere.

Far from being amusing or in the slightest way realistic, we have a film based on a totally self-centred character buoyed-up by brain dead bimbos. I appreciate that Americans have a different take on romance, relationships and humour to us Brits but, really, no-one can honestly say this isn't a car crash of a film.

It makes the 1960s and 1970s British 'Carry On' films, full of seaside postcard humour and wonderfully non-PC views on everything, seem like models of sophistication.

Avoid!
25 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyable romantic comedy/drama, it borrows "Christmas Carol" ghosts of past, present and future
btm121 March 2010
After being the root cause of his kid brother's wedding being called off, Connor Mead (Matthew McConaughey), a noted womanizer who sees male-female relationships as a strategic game to be enjoyed without becoming ensnared, is visited by the "ghost" of the first girl he ever had sex with. She tells him he will be visited by ghosts of his past, future and present girl friends. These are not ghosts of dead people but possess the shape and memories of the living women.

I found the film to be more enjoyable than I expected it would be. I generally don't care much for Matthew McConaughey films. But he surprised me in this one.

Although generally considered a romantic comedy, it is not a film aiming for laughs. It is a comedy in the sense of not a tragedy, in that it has a happy ending. Instead of funny, the story aims at giving the audience an emotional response.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm gonna have to do this in bulk … Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
jaredmobarak29 April 2009
My research into the new A Christmas Carol rip-off for the rom-com demographic, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, yielded one very interesting tidbit of information—director Mark Waters received a "special thanks" on the production of Requiem for a Dream. No disrespect to the man as I'm a big fan of Mean Girls and have wanted to check out his Spiderwick Chronicles, but how does he know Darren Aronofsky? This has all of a sudden taken over my complete interest pertaining to the new Matthew McConaughey vehicle, (and yes girls, he does eventually have his shirt off, it just takes a little longer than expected—we had a bet going on before viewing in which I said he wouldn't, but alas, a short five minute span ruined my victory). While sadly this is actually how my mind works, letting an innocuous fact about someone in relation to one of my favorite directors overshadow the issue at hand, I did seriously enjoy my time with Ghosts. Sure it was derivative; yes it was obvious; oh lord did it have a horribly orchestrated homage to Ebenezer Scrooge awakening to toss a coin to a young boy out the window in order to buy the Cratchits a turkey; but I literally had a smile on my face for the duration.

On the scale of one to ten as far as originality goes, this thing is below one. Usually that would fill my heads with preconceptions and premature hatred, so call me surprised that I unsuspectingly had a good time. It isn't that the story of unrequited love between McConaughey's Connor Mead, (I'm a bit perturbed that it never does get explained why Uncle Wayne calls him Dutch), and his childhood love Jenny, (Jennifer Garner), resonates at all—sadly it doesn't—but because of the cornucopia of supporting players that outshine the story itself. Mead is a Scrooge when it comes to the conquest of women. He doesn't believe in marriage or even love at all, stemming from a broken heart as a naïve middle-schooler watching Jenny dance with a ninth grader when he choked in asking her himself, and needs the cajoling of three ghosts armed with the reality of the loneliness his future holds to finally open his eyes to what's right in front of him. Years of building a façade over his true feelings start to chip away as the fantastic cast works their magic.

I hate to say that the main plot thread is the least enjoyable part of the film, but it's true. I never believed the connection between Garner's successful, romantic doctor and McConaughey's smarmy, reprehensible glam photographer, as the chemistry just wasn't there. Well, I lie; it was noticeable in one scene at the end when she is locked in a car and he outside. There reactions, done in close-up without the other present in the frame, make you feel their love … only it could be a love for whomever, as they aren't looking directly at the other. Now, I know that their relationship is the impetus for the entire production—he must overcome the indoctrinated ways of the lothario Michael Douglas' Uncle Wayne instilled in him to win her back—but I could have cared less whether they got together or not. It's the journey that kept me in my seat: the one-liners, (loved Douglas' "ten pin" quip), priceless facial expressions, and all around craziness excels. Even absurd moments like the inclusion of an Olympic archer, (used twice!), are so out there that you have to chuckle at least a little bit.

The effects were nicely orchestrated, but again wholly unoriginal. You can't help but reminisce about the brilliant Bill Murray film Scrooged at every turn. From Douglas' ascot wearing partier, (like Murray's once dapper boss), to Noureen DeWulf's ghost of girlfriends present punching and abusing Connor, (exactly like Carol Kane), to the ghosts watching and waving through the window at the end, (although here they do add some laughs with Douglas attempting to pick up the three ghosts … no matter their age), it's a carbon copy. But, like in Scrooged, the ghosts add so much levity to the proceedings. Emma Stone is fantastic as the geeky, braces-wearing, frizz-head who acts as the ghost of girlfriends past. An attractive actress, as seen in the likes of Superbad, she really sinks into the obnoxiousness and juvenility of being a sixteen-year-old outcast. And DeWulf, in a role that seemed a throwaway at the start, adds some sophistication to the world of Connor Mead as the one woman in his life he has not tried to bed—his assistant.

Rounding out the rest of the cast is Breckin Meyer, (more subdued than usual, I would have liked to see more from him), as Mead's brother getting married; Lacey Chabert as the bride, having fun with many over-the-top sequences and reactions; and her parents played by Anne Archer and Robert Forster. Archer steals a couple scenes as the sexy older woman, partaking in a very funny moment with McConaughey at the bar, and Forster is a riot as a Korean War vet utilizing his wartime commands in the wedding rehearsals. Even the three slutty bridesmaids create some laughs on the outskirts of the otherwise boring main plot. It's not that Garner or McConaughey are bad, they just play their roles as though themselves. With all the hustle and bustle going on, the story slowed to a crawl when focusing back on them. I literally sat through their tale in order to see the subplots continue on and the jokes surround them. So, brave the mediocrity of the overall in that you may enjoy the hilarity working on the fringes. It'll be worth the visit even if you won't be completely satisfied. But then I'm sure you didn't really expect to be.
12 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beyond Better Judgment
jon.h.ochiai4 May 2009
There are a few things very wrong with "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past". First of all, Michael Douglas as the ghost of playboy Uncle Wayne is awful. Not only is he so miscast, but the affected Gordon Gecko impersonation is ludicrous. Secondly, the screenplay by Jon Lucas and Scott Moore is so erratic, and even for a romantic comedy this is very predictable and telegraphed. The premise is cute, if not formulaic. Matthew McConaughey is elite fashion photographer Connor Mead. Connor's mentor was Herb Ritz, and now he is a celebrity icon. Connor is young, handsome, and rich. Connor is the player. In a funny opening bit, he talks with three of his current lovers on a computer conference call. Girlfriend Charlece says," Tell me you're not breaking up with me on a conference call?" He is on a tight schedule to attend his brother Paul's (Breckin Meyer) wedding at his late Uncle's estate. Oh yes, he will have sex with a gorgeous pop singer first.

McConaughey's Connor is the paragon of cad. Drunk at the rehearsal dinner, he proclaims that love is a myth. In fact he says, "Love is comfort food for the weak!" Such is the life of Connor Mead. He is jet setting around the world and having sex with the hottest women. Granted in Director Mark Waters' ("Mean Girls") story we are lead to believe that Connor deep down suffers in his vapid existence. Way deep down. Waters, Lucas, and Moore ask us to suspend our disbelief and innate shallowness. However, despite my better judgment I liked "The Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" largely due to McConaughey's arc.

In the context of Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" Connor (McConaughey) is visited by three Ghosts of Girlfriends: Past, Present, and Future. His spiritual guide is his dead Uncle Wayne (Douglas). Predictably, Connor's childhood sweetheart and of course his true love Jenny (beautiful and spirited Jennifer Garner) is the Maid of Honor at Paul and Sandra's (Lacey Chabert) Wedding. Connor also had slept with all, but one of the Brides Maids. There are some really stupid scenes such as the precarious tipping wedding cake. In another scene Connor feels up the bride's mother Vonda (smart and sexy Anne Archer), which is beyond embarrassing.

Amidst some bad narrative, I think McConaughey shines and bares his soul. McConaughey can pretty much glide through any movie on breezy, like nobody's business. However, here he has three scenes that resonate and salvaged the movie for me. With the Ghost of the Past, he is forced to watch Jenny (Garner) wake up to find him gone from her bed. Ease dropping in the present McConaughey witnesses his brother Paul (Meyer) as he tells the story of how Connor taught him to read at 2 when Connor was 7, after their parents died. Paul breaks Connor's heart when he says that you always see the best in family. McConaughey is touching when he tells Sandy (Chabert), "You gotta take a risk on love…" He didn't and it cost him.

There is no big surprise how it all ends. But here too, director Waters could have abbreviated the conclusion, instead of going for the joke. Regardless, the humane Matthew McConaughey and the wonderful Jennifer Garner distract enough with their charm and spirit from most of the movie's failings. In spite of most of "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" I was cheering for McConaughey and Garner.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Ghosts Lacks Substance
editor-5302 May 2009
My wife and I just came back from viewing the "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past." We went because she is both a big fan of Jennifer Garner from her Alias days, and she finds Matthew McConaughey charming. I went because I enjoy relationship stories.

The obvious Dickens formula was no hindrance to our anticipation of what we thought would be a funny and heartwarming story. So our disappointment in the movie was not due to the formula. In fact, I thought this handling of the Dickens outline was better than the "American Christmas Carol" which lampooned Michael Moore.

We found the movie distasteful on two counts. First, it was vulgar, second it lacked substance. We know the main character of Connor Mead had to be portrayed as a callous womanizer in order for him to repent at the end. What grieved my wife was the sleazy character, Uncle Wayne (played by Michael Douglas), who plays the Jacob Marley ghost in this story. What grieved us both was the portrayal of the brides maids as having male sex drives. Not surprising since the story was written by men.

The lack of substance was in two parts as well. First I found the love that Connor had for Jenny Perotti to be unbelievable and unable to convince us that Connor would actually repent in the end. Second, there was nothing learned about human behavior from the movie to make it truly redemptive. I found Mel Gibson to be much more believable in the movie, "What Women Want" with Helen Hunt. Both actors had more intelligent and substantial roles to play. But I think this is the key difference. "What Women Want" is a film by Nancy Meyers, a woman, whereas "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" is a film directed by Mark Waters and written by Jon Lucas and Scott Moore .... men.

If you want to see a good movie of a womanizer who repents, rent the DVD of "What Women Want" and see that again if you saw it already.
17 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ghosts of Girlfriends Past (2009)
robfollower4 February 2021
Charles Dickens' classic "A Christmas Carol" has withstood the test of time, as well as various spins and permutations, for one key reason: it is a great story. Speaking on the human condition and the passage of time in a universal way that anyone can relate to, the tale also offers a valuable message about it never being too late to turn things around-until it is. Life is fleeting, so what really counts are the decisions a person makes in the here and now. "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" puts a little corkscrew in the tried-and-true by replacing a journey through the Christmas holiday with a look at the countless relationships a womanizer has been in that have led him to his current unhappy spot, but it's a plot that still works.

Ghosts Of Girlfriends Past stars McConaughey as a magazine photographer who beds most of his models and just about every woman he comes across. His commitment to bachelorhood has left a lot of broken hearts in his wake, and it threatens to leave two more when he heads to the family estate for his brother's wedding. Only bridesmaid Jennifer Garner, his childhood sweetheart and former lover, can help keep him in check. After a visitation by his late uncle Michael Douglas, who warns him about the lonely path of the ladies' man, McConaughey takes the Dickens tour, as the ghosts of womanizing past, present, and future show him the error of his ways.

Just as you really are despising McConaughey's character (Connor Mead) to a point of fist-biting anger, the story continues with the promises of ghosts and the film rises above the depths of which it began. Suddenly it becomes heartfelt, amusing and actually quite enjoyable. As strange as it seems you manage to forgive some (but not all) of the behavior of Connor Mead. Don't get me wrong: Matthew McConaughey is far from being charming as a misogynist but he very nearly manages to redeem himself....nearly.

Connor isn't a bad person, just a misguided one. As Jenny Perotti, Jennifer Garner (2007's "Juno") has a more thankless love-interest role, but she is still very good at what she has to do and has solid chemistry with McConaughey. The underrated Breckin Meyer (2006's "Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties") is terrific as Paul, his sibling bond with Connor well-established. In a part that could have been written as stereotypical and shrill, Lacey Chabert (2004's "Mean Girls") instead plays Sandra with a welcome respect and levity. Michael Douglas and Emma Stone are blessedly good at delivering punchlines and bringing natural humor to their scene-stealing turns as Uncle Wayne and Allison Vandermeersh.

The conclusion may be terribly contrived, and the plot completely predictable in its unwavering course of correcting a tarnished soul after building Connor to be contemptible in his efforts to paint love as a corrupt and hateful institution (he mean-spiritedly claims that the power of a relationship lies within whoever cares less), but the film isn't afraid to poke fun at itself. At times, it's almost self-aware that it's a movie, taking poignant themes less than seriously. Several of the purely comedic performances, including Emma Stone as the Ghost of Girlfriends Past and Douglas as rakish libertine Wayne, are hilariously delightful. It may be a Matthew McConaughey movie, but it's decidedly more open to general audiences than his usual women-only, mindless, romantic mush. 6.5/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the Worst Films of 2009
dennis_chiu13 January 2010
"Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" was a total failure. In particular, Matthew McConaughey proves he is a mediocre actor at best.

The cinematography was the only acceptable part of this film.

It is hard to believe that one of the writers of this film, Jon Lucas, went on to write "The Hangover". How is that possible? This film is so bad Charles Dickens would roll over in his grave if could see his classic tale of redemption bastardized in this fashion. This film was neither romantic or comedic.

Further, the director made the wrong choices at almost every step in the making of this film. I cannot believe it was directed by Mark Waters, who has directed movies I loved, including "Mean Girls" (with Tina Fey), "Just Like Heaven" (with Reese Witherspoon) and "Freaky Friday" (with Jamie Lee Curtis). How did he go this far off?

Someone at some point should have pulled the plug on this film. When the dailies came out, why didn't the Executive in Charge of Production or someone from the studio say none of this was funny. At a screenplay level, what did someone see when they green-lit the script?

The main character, Connor Mead played by Matthew McConaughey, is such a callous, self- centered, womanizing jerk that there is no hero or anti-hero for which to cheer. His younger brother, Paul played by Breckin Meyer, was not developed as a character. Paul's bride-to-be is written so emotionally and psychologically defective that the audience needs to ask: "why is Paul marrying her?"

To the great actors Michael Douglas and Robert Forster, I ask: "What were you thinking when you agreed to appear in this film?" Mr. Douglas and Mr. Forster did the best they could with the material they were given, but everyone associated with this film needs to be embarrassed.

It was a complete an utter waste of time to watch this film. I hated almost every frame of this film. It is one of the worst films of 2009.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I liked the movie
trig5111 May 2009
The film started out a little slowly but began to move well. I thought that there was really good chemistry between the two main characters. I liked the film for its well conveyed message about commitment and what it means to care for people. In order to receive you need to give and vice versa. The film used Dickens as a clever vehicle for its plot and it worked for me anyway. I am not saying the film is a classic but it was a pleasant way to spend a couple of hours and I definitely would recommend it to people I know. I thought that the acting was terrific and the characters were well developed. I think the film is definitely worth seeing.
86 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sunday afternoon Chick Flick viewing - All about Matthew McConaughey but hey!
GailTaplin-9844728 April 2020
A bit of fun, lots of Matthew which is never a problem. Typically cringey but sweet. A girl's film. Clever plot line though...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Far Too Predictable...
melissa-lf9 May 2009
I wasted twelve bucks on this film that I had hoped to be an entertaining, funny but witty film with the talented Jennifer Garner.

Instead, Matthew gave a less than acceptable performance with 'old' jokes and empty humor. Although some laughs were shed, at some points I was caught between watching 'Disaster Movie 8/Scary Movie 2' or 'Rachel Getting Married'.

I'm sure if this movie would had been made several years ago, it would had been a riot! But being the year 2009, movies like this are overrated and the jokes are SO eight years ago.

Take my advice and don't waste your hard earned money on this film. You aren't missing anything. Same old, same old plot. Nothing new. Nothing surprising.

EmmaLynn
10 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun romantic comedy
dshannon10426 January 2024
"Ghosts of Girlfriends Past" is a delightful romantic comedy that captivates audiences with its charming storyline and impeccable performances. Matthew McConaughey's charismatic portrayal of Connor Mead, a commitment-phobic bachelor, is truly engaging. The film's clever spin on Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" adds a unique touch, making it both heartwarming and entertaining.

Emma Stone's presence in the film is a standout, showcasing her talent and undeniable charm. As Allison Vandermeersh, Stone brings a refreshing and endearing energy to the screen. Her chemistry with McConaughey is palpable, adding depth to the film's romantic elements. Stone's comedic timing and natural charisma elevate the overall appeal of "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past."

The film's witty dialogue, coupled with Stone's magnetic performance, contributes to its success in blending humor and romance seamlessly. The exploration of Connor's past relationships and personal growth is both relatable and touching, making it a perfect choice for those seeking a feel-good romantic comedy with a stellar cast.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Terrible Dialogue good premise
tillygriffith15 April 2020
Pretty Standard Rom-Com. Micheal Douglas was great but the leafs had negative chemistry together.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed