The Uninvited (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
158 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
make or break twist
SnoopyStyle19 October 2015
Anna (Emily Browning) returns home from a psychiatric institution after her suicide attempt. She's been struggling after her mother's death in a fire. Her mother was ill and the caretaker Rachel Summers (Elizabeth Banks) is now her father Steven (David Strathairn)'s girlfriend. Her sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel) is convinced that Rachel killed their mother. She keeps having visions of 3 little kids. Her boyfriend Matt is killed presumably in an accident after she sees him in a vision. Her father is getting remarried to Rachel. The girls discover that Rachel is using a false identity. Anna suspects her to be Mildred Kemp who killed the 3 kids in her vision and disappeared.

Emily Browning is great as a distressed teen and I like everybody in this. There is a moody ghostly sense through out the movie. This boils down to the ending. I completely understand if some people throw up their hands at the final twists. I personally scratched my head at first. In the end, I accepted it and like the movie. I could have easily gone the other way.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Exceptional build up to a "bandwagon ending".
bass-player-blues2 February 2009
I typically find newer horror movies to be cheesy, humorous, boring, and above all: not scary. You know that feeling you get when a movie starts to take its toll on your patients and causes your eyes to wander around the theater? You don't get that at all with this film. This movie grabbed me from the beginning and refused to let go. The film's music score is extremely effective at creating a suspenseful and uneasy viewer sensation, which I think deserves full appreciation for the movie's ghostly flavor. Without any doubt, appropriate music in a movie is like butter on popcorn. Would Jaws scare you without the renowned theme music? The cast was nothing less then superb. Emily Browning was perfect at playing the "sad, quiet girl with horrible visions" role. I'm not going to spoil it for anyone, but the ending of this movie really twists your mind and makes you think. I found it to be an adequate yet abrupt closure for the story despite how it is following a certain trend with recent horror movie endings.
52 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Horror story with creepy atmosphere and plenty of twists and turns
ma-cortes12 September 2010
The picture is a sleek production with acceptable budget and packs genuine chills , suspense , tension , and shocks , it's a terror-thriller very exciting . It deals with a teen named Anna Rydell(Emily Browning) , after spending a stint in a mental institution, return to the home of their father , a famous writer named Steve (David Strathairn) who is now living with her late mother's nurse, Rachel Summer (Elizabeth Banks) and both Anna and her older sister Alex (Arielle Kebel) think Rachel was responsible for her mummy's death in a seaside house blow up the year before . Once there, in addition to dealing with their stepmother's obsessive and cruel ways . Soon after her arrival , Anna also starts to receive warnings from her late ghost mother and three interfering children who affects her recovery . The Alex's sanity is also jeopardized thanks to her unbalanced stepmother , and aloof father . Another night Anna goes to sleep, she hears noises and the door to her bedroom creakily opens and meets the ghost . Terrified, she runs out of her room and tells her sister that someone has come into her room . Alex and Anna set out to look for proofs to demonstrate that Rachel is the killer.

This eerie movie produced by the successful director/producer Ivan Reitman displays terror, shocks, hard-edged drama , plot twists and creepy images . The story come to life in a wonderful fashion, giving it a haunting ominous atmosphere that often seems to mimic the tense relations between the members of the family . While the look is suitable atmospheric and scary , the argument stretches plausibility to the breaking point in a surprising finale . The film is an American remake of successful Korean film titled ¨A tale of two sisters¨ by Ji Woon Kim . It also contains the usual spooky phantoms of pale complexion from Japanese stories directed by Takashi Mike and Hideo Nakata as ¨The Grudge ¨ , ¨ The ring ¨ and ¨ Dark water ¨ . The direction is incredibly good , production design by Andrew Menzies , the cinematography by Daniel Landin , lighting, and especially the soundtrack by expert on terror scores Christopher Young , all are captivating. The motion picture is well directed by the Guard brothers , Charles and Thomas who create a powerful character study that blends chills , thrills , suspense and psychological drama in a cleverly devised plot that certainly offers more than the usual terror film . This is a frightening , psychological thriller, and familiar drama , all at their best that will appeal to horror buffs . Rating : Better than average . Worthwhile watching .
19 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Completely fooled me
begob1 November 2020
After the death of her mother in a fire, a girl returns home from the psychiatric ward to her father's house, where she rubs his pushy girlfriend up the wrong way while piecing together the events of that fateful night ...

As Maurice Moss would say, egg and my face are in perfect alignment. I only realised when reading the IMDb reviews afterward that this is a remake of a film I'd already seen. Plus at 65 mins I'd written off the story as a spooked up Nancy Drew caper, albeit produced with plenty of style and quality.

The last 10 minutes were a shock to me, and this is coming from a fan of Mulholland Dr. I was looking for clues, assuming the baddie couldn't be the obvious one, but got tired thinking about the year 1996 and fastened my seatbelt to settle in for a routine landing. Now I'm going to have to rewatch to see how skillfully the clues were laid. And rewatch the original too.

Almost everything is quality - performances, direction, editing, cinematography - except the music is just OK, a bit cliche. And I have doubts about the writing. While the dialogue between the sisters is often impressive, the father's character is frustratingly dull, and even the twist ending can't change him. Plus I'm not convinced the main character is psychologically true. I'll see when I get round to it again.

Overall: unexpectedly mixed experience.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Nutshell Review: The Uninvited
DICK STEEL9 May 2009
I haven't seen the original Tale of Two Sisters by Kim Ji-woon to begin with so I won't be able to do any meaningful comparisons. But if a remake is any indication of how the original is generally miles better, especially if done by Hollywood, hen it probably is worth my while to put the Korean horror movie in my to-watch list. After all, Kim Ji-woon's film is one of Korea's top box office draws when released.

There have been more misses than hits when Hollywood adapts what it thinks could be instant box office gold with its fountain of Asian content, and since there have been only a limited number of successful Asian horror releases in recent years, it had looked inwards and cannibalized on remaking its own shock/slasher films. This one took a long while to translate to The Uninvited, and I guess taking some 6 years indicated the filmmakers wanted to do things right instead of rushing through and come out with crap.

As such the directing duo of the Guard Brothers Charles and Thomas managed to find some balance between telling a psychological thriller, and moments where they can properly employ tricks from the usual formula book to scare an audience, with the usual light and shadows, smoke and mirrors, warped beings, decomposed bodies and jump cuts with ghouls staring down at you. Surprisingly it didn't rely on sound or lack thereof to add a further sensory dimension to set pulse racing, which I thought was a little let down in its moments to build up to the next "Boo!" If anything, the acting duo of Emily Browning (Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events, with pouty lips to rival Angelina Jolie's, and given special attention too in this narrative) and Arielle Kebbel shine as skimpily clad sisters Anna and Alex respectively, who have to rely on each other as they uncover the truth behind the death of their mom (Maya Massar). It doesn't help of course with Anna just being certified sane and safe to be released from a mental institution, and their suspect happens to be their nanny-turned-new-step-mom-to-be Rachel (Elizabeth Banks) whom dad (David Strathairn) intends to marry. Given the short run time of under 90 minutes, the pace is kept compact with little room wasted to pump in unnecessary subplots (unless set up just to provide an additional avenue to unleash horrific mayhem), focusing very much of the relationship between the two sisters, and their strained one with their father. Emily Browning, as the lead, of course had enough latitude to showcase a double-head snake role in being "nice" to Rachel, in order for some fishing of information.

That isn't to say there isn't any loophole that a jumbo jet can't fly through. Even if you have no background knowledge gained from the original Korean film, it is easy enough for sharp-eyed viewers, or those whose cinematic staple is horror films, to stay one step ahead and deduce just what is exactly going on. Which makes me wonder just how much it'll take for shockmeisters to scare seasoned audiences since they're getting savvier, and easily bored with the same old bag of tricks.

If anything, The Uninvited would have piqued your interest in the original, which has a longer run time and in all likelihood, the exploitation of mood and atmosphere that are quite standard tools for horror films from Asia, which is sorely lacking in this version. Nonetheless it's still one of the better Western remakes of Asian horror attempted.
22 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dummied Down Too Much For American Audiences
zzoaozz10 May 2009
I was incredibly disappointed. I am a fan of Asian Horror and have the movie A Tale of Two Sisters that this movie was based on. There is little real resemblance. They completely revamped it, probably because they thought American audiences were too attention deficit to sit through a real psychological thriller without a linear plot that was explained to death. They also must have thought that the concept of vengeful spirits was too scary for us because they turned it into another lame overdone psycho killer movie. They took an intense and creepy ghost story and mutilated it. What they ended up with was a movie that was boring, tedious, and predictable. Don't waste your money seeing or renting this one.
44 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The negative reviews that this film received really surprise me.
brosseauphilippe5 May 2022
For my part, I find it excellent. I who usually hate horror movies, I really enjoyed The Uninvited, because it's not a horror movie, precisely. I would rather say that it's a thriller, particularly well done, which features Emily Browning, an amazing actress who plays well throughout the film. All the supporting roles are equally compelling, from the creepy stepmother to the protective sister and the ambiguous father.

But the real strenght of The Uninvited is its ending : completely unexpected, it is very well brought and remains logical with everything that has been showed to us previously, if we watch the whole thing again. A very nice surprise for me! 8/10.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than expected, but far too content at being above average
DonFishies27 April 2009
After being cleared for release from a mental hospital, Anna (Emily Browning) returns home to her writer father Steven (David Strathairn) and sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel). In her absence, Emily's father has grown closer to her late mother's former caretaker Rachel (Elizabeth Banks). Anna is continually hallucinating and seeing her dead mother, insisting that her death was not an accident and that Rachel had something to do with it. With this in mind, she sets out with Alex to prove Rachel is not everything she seems.

I did not expect much from The Uninvited, but surprisingly, I received a lot more than I expected.

Despite being an American remake of the Korean film A Tale of Two Sisters, The Uninvited does enough to make it stand out on its own. I never saw the original film, but I imagine it looked different than this film does. It is dark and atmospheric from the very beginning, and continues on the same wavelength to the very end of the film. It frequently blends horror with psychological terror, developing a movie that could have easily been a throwaway scare-flick for pre-teens to scream through, but ends up being a fairly accomplished film. This is not a film anywhere near the quality of the greatness found in the likes of The Silence of the Lambs, but it is a film that was not just scraped out for a profit.

The story itself, as twisty and loopy as it gets, is fairly well done. Although I was not too interested at the beginning, the film draws you in rather tightly, revealing itself quite nicely over its short 87-minute running time. Yes, there are plenty of predictable moments laced throughout the film, but there are a few moments of genuine surprise as well. The film never makes the claim that it is trying to be original, but it does a unique enough job that you can only see shades of what has come before (as opposed to a standard American horror film basically spelling out exactly what it is ripping off, or homaging sort to speak). Even with the cheap scares around every corner, it still managed to make me jump back more than once.

What does not make sense however, is how some things are explicitly stated while others are briefly alluded to. A lot of what happens is fairly obvious for even the least astute of audiences, yet the film dumbs itself down more than once to fit the conventions of 2000-era PG-13 horror. When something ambiguous comes up, it is either explained in-depth, or done away with entirely. A rather crucial character element of Anna's is revealed very close to the beginning of the film, but is never explored in any capacity. We understand her motivations and what drives her quest for the truth, but there are a few background details that even after the film concludes, still left me a bit baffled. Why explain some things that are obvious, but not bother touching on ones that are not?

Despite not having starred in a lot of things, Browning is quite good in her role as Anna. Struggling throughout the film with mental anguish and hallucinations, Browning makes this young teenage character convincing in a way only someone so young could do. She is not perfect in the role, but you can see the desperation and heartbreak in her face and her actions. This is an actress who becomes her role, and never falters out of it. She carries the film from beginning to end, and never looks the worst for it. She is a young actress I hope to continue to see more of, especially in higher fare.

Kebbel, while not as powerful as Browning, commands when she is on-screen. She works beautifully off of Browning, and makes their relationship clear and pure from their first moment together. Their chemistry makes the film as surprising as it is. It easily could have been something that was clouded over, or underplayed. But the filmmakers use every opportunity to stress the strength of the relationship of the two sisters, and their willingness to go the distance for each other. Some moments are just heartbreaking, seeing the lengths they are willing to go, but Kebbel keeps herself in check at all times, and gives a great performance.

Strathairn, despite the Oscar-nomination for Good Night, and Good Luck., seems to have fallen on being the wise older character in every movie since, and gives the same old performance here. He is good as always, but seems more mellowed down than he should be. Banks on the other hand, is completely out of her comfort zone, and her performance is an obvious reflection. In some scenes, she is downright terrifying as the evil potential stepmother, and in others, she is laughably bad. There is no middle ground, and no one seems to have been able to suggest any consistency tips for her. While she gives a decent performance anyway, it could have been stronger with a more confident actress.

But what the film is guilty of is its lack of reinvention. It is a unique piece of horror for 2009, but the film never strives to be anything bigger or better. It lacks the motivations to really make something of itself, and never even tries to be something better than it could be. The Uninvited really surprised me for how good it actually was, but surprised me more in how easily it could have been even better. A lean running time, a great pair of young actresses, and some decent supporting acting could have made this small picture quite the notorious horror flick. But instead, it seems content just being an above average run-of-the-mill psychological thriller.

7/10.

(Portions of this review originally appeared on http://www.dvdfanatic.com).
24 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No complaints here!
Just-A-Girl-147 March 2021
The Uninvited is not your typical horror film and that's a good thing! I didn't see the original movie (2003 South Korean horror film called "A Tale of Two Sisters") so I can't say if it's better or worse but on it's own it's a great psychological horror film! The plot is good. There's a really great character development and the build up to the end is done really well. Really keeps the viewers engaged. I especially liked the movie's atmosphere. It was scary, creepy and intense and not your typical dumb slasher. It's a mix of psychological thriller and horror in one movie. You won't find moronic characters, cheap jump scares and tons of gore and nudity in this film. Which, as far as I'm concerned, is a good thing! I really don't understand the bad reviews! It might not be an Oscar Winner but so what?! As a horror/thriller it's really good. The cast and crew did an excellent job and I also enjoyed the beautiful scenery (most of the movie was shot at one location, a beautiful waterfront property in Vancouver, British Columbia). If you never seen it, give it a chance!
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Browning's captivating performance can't save this turkey! (SPOILER ALERT)
Capesider7 May 2009
I saw this movie BEFORE the original Korean horror film ('A Tale of Two Sisters' ) that it was based on and I found this a bland, blunter, popcorn shocker version of the film.

The sole merit of this film is Emily Browning. She turns in a credible performance. You believe in her, makes you fear for her, and that's half the battle.

So it's such a shame that the directors and screenwriters drop the ball so badly. Everything in this movie is SO geared to a major twist in the last reel that instead of making you bug out with its rug-pulling impact, like Sixth Sense or Usual Suspects do, it instead just makes you roll your eyes.

Why? Because like those 2 films i've mentioned this flick lacks of any preceding foreshadowing or character nuance thus robbing the end twist of its intended impact. Oh, and the cheesy J Horror ghosts moments seem more Scary Movie than The Ring.

The Korean original was creepier, confusing in parts but it comes together in the end and the cinematography is beautifully framed (one impressive shot comes out from underwater and up onto a deck where the titular sisters are sitting). The Guard Brothers ignore such artistry and go for a generic approach and when they do breakaway its to copy/homage a Kubrick helicopter shot from 'The Shining'.

Strathairn (fantastic in Good Night + Good Luck) is wasted. Banks, who has proved her on screen versatility in an eclectic choice of roles in multiple pics over the past year, here goes for the fairy tale Step mother - the steel under her smile was borderline hammy but she definitely is one of the best (and overlooked) actresses in the business.

All in all - avoid this film and seek out the Korean original instead but if it turns up on cable and you have 87 minutes to waste - watch it for Browning and Banks and the fun of yawning at a schlock-y story. LOL
24 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
TV dinner
chaos-rampant30 August 2011
Some movies you just know are not going to complete your soul. You watch them because it's a social circumstance - because you are never going to convince your group of friends to watch a Wojciech Has - or are just looking to get some images before your eyes that don't demand you work with them but passively absorb. It was only after coming here that I read this was supposed to be a remake of the Tale of Two Sisters; dumbed down is right, it's the marketable, prefab version smoothed out for our precarious amusement.

I am not a fan of the Ji-Woon film, but whereas that was frightfully complex, this is comfortably simple; you can recommend it to your group of friends, co-workers, family, and be sure it's going to be the blandest choice every time.

Oh, there is the eventual twist, as is the vogue of the times, meant to open up a chasm of depths beneath our feet. It does no such thing of course. A writer must be shamefully unhinged to write something like that down post-Sixth Sense. Elizabeth Banks is horrible as the menacing step-mother, the two teenage girls prance around like it's a Twilight audition.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Our inner demons can sometimes make us do the unexpected
ridi-arahan1 February 2021
What worked: It's a beautifully shot and captured movie, with amazing natural space. The movie keeps its essence and mysterious till the end, which is a plus point, making it a watchable movie What did not work I must say the screenplay and narrative of the movie is weak, making it a dull watch because of the lack of substance. The movie is a simple thriller, with few thrills or exciting scenes. I would have loved the movie more if the movie had maintained the mood and climate of the movie. It's not a bad watch but an average watch Final verdict: it's an okay time pass movie
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A good looking and technically sound film, but ultimately VERY lame and ineffective...
lathe-of-heaven30 January 2010
Man... How do I put this without sounding unhinged...

Okay, first and foremost, ANY time I wish to read about a film that I am interested in I ALWAYS read the 'External' reviews first, which for me personally especially where Horror films are involved, I rely on COMPLETELY as opposed to the 'User' reviews. Those are usually much more balanced and you can count of the fact that they are genuine and NOT 'plants'. Admittedly, Horror is EXTREMELY subjective, so perhaps some may enjoy this film; although I'm sorry, but I must admit that I most certainly did not, and to me at least some of these 'rave reviews' are so calculatingly worded as to how 'wonderful' the film is in EVERY way that it makes me a bit nauseous. I don't know, maybe I just have a bad case of gas...

For what it's worth, at least for my personal taste, ANY time there is a Horror film that catches my eye I always try to see if 'Slasherpool's site has reviewed it, because many times I do agree with their taste and their reviews. This one had 1 star out of a possible 5. He had seen the original and felt that this one was a complete travesty by comparison. He also stated that as a stand alone film not taking into account the original, that it was just very poor instead of abysmal. Just thought I'd share that, since I don't know how many take the time to read the 'External Reviews. To me, his are usually right on the nose and what I really appreciate about his reviews is that whether it is a tame PG-13 film like this one or a horrendous Slasher film, he treats them all equally as to their cinematic merits. (***UPDATE: Sadly, since my writing this, the site no longer exists :(

Now, from MY standpoint. First off, the reason I even give this film 2 stars is because the production values and photography and the technical aspects of it are very good. But... sadly, that is about it. Primarily I just did NOT like the acting at all; sure, Strathairn is an excellent actor, but right from the beginning, Emily Browning's acting in the Psychiatrists office, her little predictable 'pensive' and 'ooh, do you really think so' expressions, etc., just did NOT ring true to me at all at any level whatsoever. The interaction between the two sisters including the 'acting' of the other sister, pretty much the same thing. The direction... Well, I don't know, maybe it's personal preference but I just felt we were being led along a very, VERY predictable path from the first scene in her bedroom after she had gone to sleep (not giving any specifics away of course) Honestly, the whole thing just felt like complete cardboard. Like 'Okay, let's show how scared she is... okay now lets play the scary sounds... okay now lets build up the 'suspense'...' Sorry, the film just did absolutely NOTHING for me. Didn't care, wasn't moved, didn't like the girl at all...

It strikes me that perhaps what was sorely missing was a GENUINE atmosphere. I just did not FEEL it at all. Her reactions were completely 'plastic' and unbelievable, which could have been the fault of the director either not bringing the right performance out of her (because she IS supposed to be a good actress) or perhaps in the editing, choosing the wrong takes, I don't know. It just wasn't working for me...

So, what we are left with is a very nice looking movie with good production values, but completely unmoving, sterile, unrealistic and unbelievable. The interactions between characters are artificial. The film has absolutely NO atmosphere at all, which is COMPLETELY unforgivable for a Ghost Story...
23 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprize, surprise, you can still make a good horror movie
peterkowalski16 April 2009
It's not easy to make a horror movie these days. The critics will hate it by definition: their expectations are always high and mostly unsatisfiable. They will call them uninspirational, uninteresting, and not original enough. With time, the horror genre has become an underdog of the movie industry. Prior to watching this movie, I had no knowledge about the plot whatsoever and it turned out to be good for me. I won't beat around the bush: I'm not a horror fanatic, but this one, I enjoyed from the beginning until the very end and I was pleasantly surprised with the outcome. The thing I appreciated the most was the great amount of mystery: at some point the movie becomes more a mystery movie than a horror movie. The plot is interesting at the very least: and it does make you think who the main villain might be. I personally had many guesses and I though I got it right, but the ending surprised me. And there's nothing I enjoy more than an ending I did not see coming. The surroundings are beautiful and the movie is very well shot. Visually, the pictures are very satisfying, another thing you would not expect. The acting is also professional, along the score: all these parts, I have no complaints about. The movie was, for some reasons I don't fully understand, certified as not fresh enough. I do agree, some moments are painfully cliché, but in this case, I found it charming. Isn't it a part of the horror movie to expect that a hand will try to reach you under the bed? It will make you jump in your place either way, so what's the deal? As long it's not cheesy, it's good enough for me. I think that if the creators maybe took a risk and avoided those couple of clichés, the movie would have been praised by critics. But who cares about their opinion anyway? The movie is really enjoyable and if that is what matters to you, don't hesitate and watch it. You won't regret it.
171 out of 233 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You're always wondering what's coming next. It's a thriller worth seeing for Emily Browning's good acting, suspense, good story and sad and unexpected ending
fernandoschiavi31 December 2021
Psychological horror with supernatural elements, The Two Sisters Mystery is the American remake of Fear (Janghwa, Hongryeon, 2003), South Korean cult director Jee-woon Kim. Charles Guard and Thomas Guard direct the new version, which stars Emily Browning (Sleeping Beauty) and Arielle Kebbel (The Vampire Diaries). As happens in most cases, the remake doesn't surpass the original. But it has its merits, and it's still a good pastime. Its American version is what we usually expect from reproductions that are basically copies of someone else's work: fun, with intriguing moments, but very obvious. As obvious as it is, the film is more like a video explaining the ambivalent traits of the South Korean, as it builds its narrative based on our interpretation of the possible issues raised by the oriental production and its path towards an open outcome.

The film begins with teenager Anna (Browning) being released from a mental hospital where she has spent the past 10 months. Anna attempted suicide after her mother died in a fire. And the trauma caused the girl's brain to block part of the memories of the tragedy. Her father Steven (David Strathairn, from Stronger Than Bombs) welcomes her with open arms in the family's rural residence. But what Anna really wants is to reunite with Alex (Kebell), the rebellious party sister whose opinions are constantly ignored by her father. But going home also brings some problems for our little protagonist. One is having to live with Rachel (Elizabeth Banks, from Brightburn: Son of Darkness), her mother's ex-nurse, who has now been leveraged to daddy's girlfriend status. The other is being haunted by ghosts, which makes Anna suspect that her would-be stepmother is hiding dark secrets. Was the fire that killed her mother really an accident?

The Uninvited is a curious product. Fruit of a late crop of American remakes based on Asian works (in this case, the 2003 Korean feature Fear), the film offers very little beyond what we've already seen in the same genre, moving considerably away from the original material and failing, in the at the same time, in creating any identity of its own. The plot, at first, is confused with examples ranging from The Scream to The Devil's Spine, efficient horrors about ghosts and curses. However, this feature doesn't stand on its own story, appealing at all times to the cheesiest clichés of horror cinema, such as the existence of adult characters that don't give credit to the younger ones, as well as several jumpscares based on the sudden increase of the soundtrack. If the film is not so committed, it is because of its main assets: photography that bets on dark tones and angles that reinforce the isolation of those characters, as well as the performances of Emily Browning, beautiful and totally at ease as the protagonist of a horror film, exhibiting fragility and strength at the right times; and Elizabeth Banks (Creeping Beings), who also convinces as the "villain" of the plot, without committing excesses in its composition.

The film is divided between family drama, Anna and Alex's investigations and moments of supernatural horror. The ghostly apparitions range from scary children to hairy creepy woman, in line with j-horror productions. But there is still room for a deformed figure that refers to Zelda, from Cemitério Maldito. Practical effects and makeup are good. Violence is moderate, but gains a certain strength in the last act. As already mentioned, the Guard brothers constantly resort to jump scares. Some even work. But the film scares even more when the terror is accompanied by silence, as in that scene where the protagonist notices a creature hidden in a dark corner of her room. Christopher Young's soundtrack is good and one of the highlights of the plot, with some tracks being outstanding.

This isn't a horror movie in which you'll be scared a lot, it's a thriller, one of those that we were quite intrigued during the course of it. The most important factor in this cinematographic genre is perhaps, for many, the climate in which the narrative is built, and this point is essential to make this a great film. But there's not just suspense surrounding him, there's also mystery. Even though the script leaves clues from the beginning, mainly trying to deceive the audience with very evident false clues taking the viewer's eye in a direction, the ending ends up being predictable in relation to who "isn't" the villain of the story. The question was really about how the facts unfolded. Longtime horror movie fans are likely to end the riddle before its time, not least because the screenplay by Craig Rosenberg, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard delivers some clues that make this task easier. If you can't catch them, you're sure to be surprised by the final twist.

The Uninvited, directed by Charles and Thomas Guard, is the kind of movie worth seeing at least twice; the first for the pleasure of the story, the second to see how everything is conducted following its own logic. I believe that a film is a universe closed in on itself. The rules he creates, from the first frame to the final scene, are valid only for the duration of the film, and it is through this set of parameters that we must judge the unfolding of a plot. In this sense, I consider The Uninvited honest enough with what he proposes. The characters' attitudes, the way they interact and the decisions they make follow a logic determined by the point of view adopted in the narrative.

We have some crucial moments in the script, where the acting must be good to be able to convey to the viewer what the script wants. In general, the biggest burden was on Browning, which at the time of its release and still very young, already demonstrated that it was more than capable of carrying a film on its back. The way Emily Browning's character evolves is interesting, trying to convince herself more and more that she's not freaking out, and dreading going back to the madhouse. The actress' charisma helps the audience feel sorry for poor Anna.

Craig Rosenberg, Doug Miro and Carlo Bernard's screenplay explores the fine line between reality and fantasy. The ending is absolutely twisted, makes the spectator revisit several events of the film, trying to understand what happened, and then everything is explained. In fact, it will be a surprise for everyone who sees the movie. It's interesting when a movie convinces us that the characters are acting in the way they think is right, and then shows us how wrong we are. Don't expect graphic violence or lots of deaths, because there's hardly any.

The Guard brothers do a job just right, without innovations, betting on insurance, but they show their inexperience. This is a psychological thriller, where scenes with ghosts are well applied, but not frightening. Suspense works well, you're always wondering what's coming next. This is a tight movie due to its short duration, which doesn't leave time for some characters to develop and the story to explain itself better. Still, it's a thriller worth seeing for Emily Browning's good acting, suspense, good story and sad and unexpected ending. Probably, if guided by more experienced directors, it would be a great movie. Recommended for thrillers, anyone looking for much more than that might be disappointed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unremarkable, unimaginative and unnecessary
Ali_John_Catterall3 November 2009
Brace yourselves - here comes another one of those 'orrible 'uns! With some notable exceptions (Unforgiven, The Untouchables, The Unbearable Lightness Of Being), movies sporting the prefix 'un' in their titles are frequently hostages to fortune. On the one hand, they're more interesting-sounding than, say 'The Born', 'The Faithful' or 'The Canny' (and somewhere in a parallel universe there exists a John Wayne western called 'The Defeated'). On the other hand, the very application of those negative prefixes can ironically hasten the film's undoing. Which is unfortunate. And obviously undesirable.

Such is the fate of The Uninvited, another all-too inevitable K-horror remake. Here, young Anna (Australian actress Emily Browning) returns home after a year's spell in a psychiatric clinic, following the devastating death of her invalid mother in a housefire. Along with her elder, spunkier sister Alex (Arielle Kebbel) she's soon warring with her frosty-knickered stepmother, and mom's former live-in nurse, Rachael (a miscast Elizabeth Banks, in Hand That Rocks The Cradle mode).

In a scenario that would have Sigmund Freud jumping up and down and furiously pulling his beard, Anna becomes convinced that Rachael did away with her ailing charge and is plotting to kill the daughters next, the better to have dad (David Strathairn) all to her self. Meanwhile, a creeping dread pervades their New England coastal home - ghostly children, the old hands-round-the-edge-of-the-bedcovers routine and charred manifestations of mum, all seeming to point to Rachael's culpability. Is Anna actually onto something? Or did somebody sign the wrong release form? Like Identity, The Sixth Sense or Secret Window, this is one of those two-for-one deals necessitating, so producers hope, an immediate return visit once the pleasantly deceived audience has, or thinks it has, 'got it'. Unlike most of these Hollywood riddle-me-rees however, there's little that was formulaic or pat about 2003's powerful and poignant A Tale Of Two Sisters (aka Janghwa, Hongryeon).

We actually cared about put-upon sisters Su-Mi and Su-Yeon, so that the pleasing 'aha!' moment, when it arrived, was severely tempered by an almost unbearable sense of grief. Much of this came down to the quality of the acting, in particular a pair of performances of astonishing subtlety and maturity from the young leads. And perhaps uniquely, among this era's crop of South-East Asian horrors, it managed to Tazer the nerves while gently breaking your heart.

The Guard brothers' remake, by contrast, is the usual exercise in jump-scares and PG-13 thrills, more concerned with getting to the twist as swiftly as possible, like a conjuror who remembers he's left the iron on the moment he takes the stage. Depth and characterisation suffer accordingly - though the waifish Browning impresses; a tiny pink flower with fraying petals turned in on themselves. She has an unusual, interesting face, and an assured future, at least, in playing damaged poppets. Hopefully, she'll soon put such bland fare behind her; although Banks and Srathairn should frankly be sent to bed without any supper. At the film's pre-release press screening, the final reveal elicited a single, irritated 'Tch!' from some anonymous critic in the dark. That little noise pretty much sums up this entire production.
22 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An excellent remake.
pokeballzlol1 February 2009
While many people are just so put off by this film for many reasons, I was very surprised by how it actually turned out.

Although the original, "A Tale of Two Sisters", was an epic movie that delivered certain moods and feelings that this movie (and most other films to date) couldn't quite capture, this film was still just great.

One thing to understand was that this movie was completely westernized. Remakes such as "The Grudge" take place in Japan, but the main characters are replaced with an American or European cast, and sometimes the story just doesn't quite fit the way it should with that type of a cast. In this film, the "A Tale of Two Sisters" story is completely translated into an American setting, in the north in a small town. The characters are tweaked a little to accommodate the new setting, and so are some of the scenes and plot lines. This is where many fans of the original get upset and get their panties in a bunch.

If this film was truly remade true to the original, it would just be the original film itself being remade 5 years later with the same cast and same script. This film is honestly one of the best Asian-horror remakes that has been made in the past 3 or 4 years if not ever. The cast gives solid performances and there were little or no plot holes. There were actually less plot holes in this film than the original. Of course I liked the original more, but I'm just saying this film executed certain things that the first film didn't, just like the first film executed certain things this film didn't. They are meant to be similar but different, and that is what makes both of them worth seeing.

8.5/10
169 out of 232 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What a twist in the end !!!
ketgup837 February 2012
The Uninvited was see-and-you-will-love-it thriller which had a smooth run until there was a solid twist in the end which will make you watch couple of scenes over the again. Anna has been just released from a mental hospital where she was being treated after her mother died in an unfortunate tragic accident. She happily goes back to her normal life to meet her darling little sister and her father. She soon realizes that her father is having a girlfriend who is staying along with them. As she starts living in the house , she is haunted by the spirit of her mother claiming her accident was actually a murder. She starts investigating about her mother's death and finds something which unravels an unsolved mystery. The Uninvited is a remake of a Japanese horror "The tale of two sisters". Japanese movies have always some interesting stories to be told and this one succeeds in the same. The screenplay is somewhat sluggish but it's the twist in the end which makes the film worth watching. The direction is decent along with the performances. The cinematography is captivating while the background score gives you a genre of horror movies. Watch this if you have liked the Grudge , the Mirror , the Shutter. Though not scary as them but it has some fine captivating moments : Good -3.5/5
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
American version of "a tale of two sisters"
lexchic-865 February 2009
First I want to say is... If you like this movie and you like to watch Japanese/korean scary movies...watch "A tale of Two sisters" it is the exact same thing except better!. However, I was impressed by this movie it is very good!

It took about half of the movie for me to realize that we took this movie and made an American version. Sometimes I think that we destroy good forgein movies but this one I was happy with. In "a tale of two sisters" I don't remember a step-mother, It's been awhile since I've watched it, but they do have a dinner party where she sees the dead person under the stove, she kills her sister and doesn't remember it, she can see and talk to her sister up until the very ending. same exact movie But I like them both!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A surprisingly good movie with an unexpected twist...
Mister-Creeper19 April 2009
I was thoroughly entertained by this film. It was definitely not what I was expecting, and that is a good thing. This is a film that makes you think you have seen it done in other films so many times before, but then the surprise twist shatters all those thoughts. I highly recommend this film. It's one that you will have to watch again to pick up on all the things you missed yet thought you saw...

I give this film a 7 out of 10. I would have given it a higher rating, but it does share a common plot element with a few movies already made. I could name those movies, but I don't want to give anything away. Just watch it once for the entertainment value, then watch it the second time to truly understand it and see what you missed...
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Like a sub-par Lifetime movie
truwarier20 August 2010
Movie is incredibly static. Scenes in which nearly nothing (or less) happens take minutes. Single shots of characters sitting in a tub talking or riding in a car talking or sitting in a diner talking drag severely, even when they aren't very long. The actors are bland and unemotive. The score is quite sparse, if sometimes solid. The effects are generally uninteresting. There is really nothing to recommend besides the main girl's upper lip which looks like it could support a decent mustache.

Again, it's basically a very long string of inconsequential, undynamic dialogue scenes in different, consistently bland settings with a few mediocre horror scenes interspersed. As it progresses it also manages to incorporate competent montages that move the plot forward as well as some gratuitous overhead and insert shots.

Has to be disappointing if you were expecting anything.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Can't lie, I appreciated
pesaresigiovanni20 April 2020
With a bit of more virtuosism at directing would've been great, but "The Uninvited" even if can't always scare, keeps you interested and leaves you disturbed and satisfied.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A psychological thriller worth seeing
bunny_mecha15 May 2009
"The Uninvited". Good movie. Scary? Not really. Worth seeing? Yes, definitely. But most fans of the original "A Tale of Two Sisters" will probably hate it. Before watching this I did read the plot. It may have been stupid to do so and it did spoil the movie. But let me tell you, it was still a good experience at the theaters.

The acting was...brilliant. Especially Browning. I really liked the cinematic effect. The cinematographer, Dan Landin, did an excellent job. The lighting was good. The camera angles were good. The sound was also good thanks to the Sound Department.

"The Uninvited" is very different and unique. It may have a few cliché jumps and scares, but in the end it was really worth seeing. So if you're wanting to see a meaningful movie of vengeance and reality, watch this one. You'll be happy you did.
75 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would recommended
mccourtpaula23 July 2020
When I came across this film I didnt expect to enjoy it as much as i did. It had good plot twists and kept me intrigued. It had a good story line and jump scares.

I would recommend it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprisingly Good
stjoeswebmania28 January 2009
A lot of people seem to be judging this movie by the trailer alone, but I was lucky enough to see an advance screening today, and I have to say that the movie was not what I expected. Sure, some of the obvious plot points in the trailer are there, but overall, the movie was really quite good. Suspenseful, scary at the right moments, with a hint of a flavor you don't see in most movies.

I'm not going to say much about it, but take my word for it that I thought it was really well done. It's not perfect, but it definitely does well for itself. Don't just judge a book by its cover, nor a movie simply by its trailer.

Yes, it may be a remake, but it's a good remake. I give it: 8/10.
133 out of 213 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed