Tombstone
- El episodio se transmitió el 13 abr 2005
- TV-14
- 44min
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA lawyer from a prestigious corporate law firm is murdered. One of the firm's senior partners is reluctant to testify against the accused for selfish reasons. Detective Green is critically w... Leer todoA lawyer from a prestigious corporate law firm is murdered. One of the firm's senior partners is reluctant to testify against the accused for selfish reasons. Detective Green is critically wounded escorting a reluctant witness.A lawyer from a prestigious corporate law firm is murdered. One of the firm's senior partners is reluctant to testify against the accused for selfish reasons. Detective Green is critically wounded escorting a reluctant witness.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
Fotos
- DA Arthur Branch
- (as Fred Dalton Thompson)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
"Tombstone", actually a first part to a two parter (which concluded on the very short lived 'Law and Order: Trial by Jury'), to me is a great episode. A strong contender for the best one of the second half of Season 15, the best since "Gunplay" and the last one of the season to be great (was mixed on the next four). It may not be 'Law and Order' firing on all cylinders, but as far as Season 15 goes, "Tombstone" is one of the better episodes.
A bit routine to begin with, but it very quickly becomes a lot twistier and more intricate.
Photography while very close up doesn't come over as too static or filmed play-like, while the production values are typically solid and have subtle atmosphere while not being drab and keeping things simple. When the music is used it is haunting and has a melancholic edge that is not overdone. The episode is sympathetically yet uncompromisingly directed. The acting is very good, Jesse L Martin and Fritz Weaver particularly (do agree that Annie Parrisse has settled very well and is a big improvement over Elisabeth Rohm).
It is an intelligently and tautly scripted episode, especially when in court and the hard boiled banter between the detectives. The story becomes increasingly intricate and twisty, without feeling rushed or convoluted, and there is genuine tension as the conflict mounts. The ending did shock me on first viewing and it still does have the shock factor, the abruptness of the resolve didn't sit right with me at first as it was not clear to me whether it would continue in another episode. It does luckily, but it does mean having to watch another show to see the conclusion. Not my favourite kind of ending, incompleteness is a danger, but executed well here and makes one want to see the episode concluding the story (it's concluded on 'Trial by Jury').
Overall, great. 9/10.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis was Fritz Weaver's final television acting role before his death on November 26, 2016 at the age of 90.
- ErroresThe defendant's attorney tells McCoy that her client will plead guilty to first degree manslaughter if he gets a sentence of 2-6 years in prison. However an experienced criminal attorney should know that as a violent class B felony manslaughter one carries a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison. It would be unlawful for someone to be sentenced to a minimum term of two years in prison for manslaughter one; in fact even if the defendant plead guilty to second degree manslaughter he still couldn't get a minimum of two years as that is a violent class C felony with a minimum sentence of 3-1/2 years.
The only homicide charges that could get a minimum sentence of under three years are vehicular manslaughter in the second degree (a class D felony with a sentence of 2-7 years) and criminally negligent homicide (a class E felony with a sentence of 1-4 years).
- Citas
Ed Green: Come on, Stu, it's just a swab.
Stuart Arlen: It's just fascist and unconstitutional.
Ed Green: Well, if you're innocent, what's the big deal?
Stuart Arlen: Oh, come on. Don't play that game with me.
Detective Joe Fontana: It's no game. Trust me.
Stuart Arlen: Is that a threat?
Detective Joe Fontana: Why, no, Mr. Arlen, that's not a threat. A threat would be more like... If you mouth off to us one more time, I'm gonna break your jaw. And when you're on the ground, I'm gonna kick you in your ribs until you spit blood, you cheap shyster. That would be a threat. This is more like a request.
- ConexionesReferenced in Law & Order: Trial by Jury: Skeleton (2005)