The Fourth Man
- L'épisode a été diffusé 28 sept. 1982
- 52m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
7,0/10
220
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen three learned men (a doctor, a lawyer and a priest) debate a young woman's recent suicide, they are joined by a fourth man with intimate knowledge of the case.When three learned men (a doctor, a lawyer and a priest) debate a young woman's recent suicide, they are joined by a fourth man with intimate knowledge of the case.When three learned men (a doctor, a lawyer and a priest) debate a young woman's recent suicide, they are joined by a fourth man with intimate knowledge of the case.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Avis en vedette
As this tale concerns the supernatural and "orthodox: Christianity, it goes down rather hard on the pertinent points. I can understand everyone's perspective, especially the religious figure. While I appreciate his view, I can think that something else is at play in this instance for which his religious training did not prepare him.
It seems every prolific writer eventually delves into the supernatural. This is especially true of the mystery writers (such as Conan Doyle). However, throughout her works, I did not find Agatha Christie out of touch with the genre, either of the supernatural or the effects of religion, per se, some of which deserve pillorying. This is with the understanding that there is a difference in religion and literally taken Biblical Christianity. Christie did not demean Christianity, I have found, but its posing counterpart in the guise of standardized religion.
Thus, this was a bold endeavor, rather early-on in her career, and likely universally not anyone's favorite of her stories of any type. Personally, I come to her for diversion and entertainment, and the subject story does not fall into those ranks for me.
However, she is always good, and this is not a story I would revisit; however, it is not one that I would strike from my ownership of her works.
It seems every prolific writer eventually delves into the supernatural. This is especially true of the mystery writers (such as Conan Doyle). However, throughout her works, I did not find Agatha Christie out of touch with the genre, either of the supernatural or the effects of religion, per se, some of which deserve pillorying. This is with the understanding that there is a difference in religion and literally taken Biblical Christianity. Christie did not demean Christianity, I have found, but its posing counterpart in the guise of standardized religion.
Thus, this was a bold endeavor, rather early-on in her career, and likely universally not anyone's favorite of her stories of any type. Personally, I come to her for diversion and entertainment, and the subject story does not fall into those ranks for me.
However, she is always good, and this is not a story I would revisit; however, it is not one that I would strike from my ownership of her works.
Fans of Midsomer murders will enjoy watching John Nettles (DCI Barnaby) as Raoul!
It is an intriguing short story and the episode brought the story to life very well! Definitely a case where adaptation matches the story with small changes that enhance the original on screen!
John Nettles' portrayal of Raoul shows devotion and the intent to make sense of the mystery!
Even though the production quality is not great, the outdoor scenes of Felicie, Annette and Raoul are atmospheric! Annette's piano playing and singing is also very natural
Many episodes of the Agatha Christie Hour were thoughtfully cast and written, this is one of the best in the series!
It is an intriguing short story and the episode brought the story to life very well! Definitely a case where adaptation matches the story with small changes that enhance the original on screen!
John Nettles' portrayal of Raoul shows devotion and the intent to make sense of the mystery!
Even though the production quality is not great, the outdoor scenes of Felicie, Annette and Raoul are atmospheric! Annette's piano playing and singing is also very natural
Many episodes of the Agatha Christie Hour were thoughtfully cast and written, this is one of the best in the series!
Four men are on a train and they are all discussing the death of a woman named Felicie who supposedly had multiple personalities. It is about a girl that was living in a home for children that have no where to go.
John Nettles is not part of the group of 3 but he knows the woman they are discussing because he lost his parents and lived in the same home which is huge.
RAOUL/Nettles goes on to tell the men about some of the people he made friends with Felicie and Annette. He describes how pretty, smart and talented Annette is.
He says him and Felicie were Annette's slaves like it was a joke. He loves Annette. Annette was mean, she called Felicie names and mocked her. That did not seem wrong to Raoul/Nettles.
This is not a Agatha Christie story. She never made the main character look good who was evil and she did not put believe in spiritualism at valid. The characters that were nuts or bad had Crosses around their necks. She did not mock religion like in this story.
John Nettles is not part of the group of 3 but he knows the woman they are discussing because he lost his parents and lived in the same home which is huge.
RAOUL/Nettles goes on to tell the men about some of the people he made friends with Felicie and Annette. He describes how pretty, smart and talented Annette is.
He says him and Felicie were Annette's slaves like it was a joke. He loves Annette. Annette was mean, she called Felicie names and mocked her. That did not seem wrong to Raoul/Nettles.
This is not a Agatha Christie story. She never made the main character look good who was evil and she did not put believe in spiritualism at valid. The characters that were nuts or bad had Crosses around their necks. She did not mock religion like in this story.
The Fourth Man is an unusual Agatha Christie story. It is a psychological even a a supernatural story delving into a character being possessed.
Raoul Letardau (John Nettles) joins three men in a train compartment to discuss the suicide of a young woman. She strangled herself as she suffered from some kind of multiple personality disorder.
The other men on the train are a doctor, a lawyer and a priest who are left intrigued by the story Raoul recalls. Raoul is a journalist who was present at the lecture the doctor gave. He also knew two women involved in this case since childhood.
Raoul made friends with Felicie and Annette when they were both girls. Annette was clever, pretty and talented. When she grew up she enchanted everyone as a performer but illness cut her life short.
Felice was hardworking and strong. She was not pretty and used to be cruelly mocked by Annette. Time after time Annette could dominate Felice, even after her death.
It took a while to get the story going. I was also distracted because the actresses playing the young girls were clearly too old for the roles. Although they would later also play the older Felicie and Annette.
It needed to be more surefooted at the beginning although it did get better as the story went on. A rather bold story from Christie.
are sharing a compartment in a night train, enjoying some casual conversation along the way. Their order is disrupted by a fourth passenger in the same compartment, who was present at the doctor's latest lecture, and tells them a personal but also related story of growing up, dual personalities, and possible murder. His story is quite absorbing, and his small audience, as well as the bigger one watching this movie, is carried along, trying to guess where it's going. When it arrives at its destination, the nature of the story is left ambiguous: is it about supernatural "possession"? A strong personality dominating a weak one? A girl with excellent acting abilities that has been fooling everyone? This is yet another Agatha Christie tale which shows how ahead of her time she was in many ways, like her questioning and challenging of the "established" authorities in both the religious and the scientific fields. Exceptionally well-cast, unusual and haunting episode. *** out of 4.
Raoul Letardau (John Nettles) joins three men in a train compartment to discuss the suicide of a young woman. She strangled herself as she suffered from some kind of multiple personality disorder.
The other men on the train are a doctor, a lawyer and a priest who are left intrigued by the story Raoul recalls. Raoul is a journalist who was present at the lecture the doctor gave. He also knew two women involved in this case since childhood.
Raoul made friends with Felicie and Annette when they were both girls. Annette was clever, pretty and talented. When she grew up she enchanted everyone as a performer but illness cut her life short.
Felice was hardworking and strong. She was not pretty and used to be cruelly mocked by Annette. Time after time Annette could dominate Felice, even after her death.
It took a while to get the story going. I was also distracted because the actresses playing the young girls were clearly too old for the roles. Although they would later also play the older Felicie and Annette.
It needed to be more surefooted at the beginning although it did get better as the story went on. A rather bold story from Christie.
are sharing a compartment in a night train, enjoying some casual conversation along the way. Their order is disrupted by a fourth passenger in the same compartment, who was present at the doctor's latest lecture, and tells them a personal but also related story of growing up, dual personalities, and possible murder. His story is quite absorbing, and his small audience, as well as the bigger one watching this movie, is carried along, trying to guess where it's going. When it arrives at its destination, the nature of the story is left ambiguous: is it about supernatural "possession"? A strong personality dominating a weak one? A girl with excellent acting abilities that has been fooling everyone? This is yet another Agatha Christie tale which shows how ahead of her time she was in many ways, like her questioning and challenging of the "established" authorities in both the religious and the scientific fields. Exceptionally well-cast, unusual and haunting episode. *** out of 4.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis story is from the short story collection The Hound of Death and Other Stories
- GaffesAlthough John Nettles affects a heavy French action initially, it virtually disappears as time goes on. John Nettles' character is French. When he is relating the story to the three men on the train he is speaking in English, but since he is meant to be a Frenchman speaking in another tongue, he speaks with a French accent. In the flashback scenes he is 'speaking French', and so does not speak with a French accent. So, his French accent does not disappear, it is used to denote the times when he is not speaking in his own language.
- Citations
Felicie Bault: You made me look ridiculous.
Annette Ravel: [In a mean-spirited manner] I didn't have to try very hard.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée52 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
