Double Cross (TV Movie 2006) Poster

(2006 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Rehash of "Strangers on a Train"
krorie7 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I was disappointed in this made for TV flick, not because it copied the Hitchcock thriller "Strangers on a Train," but because it missed a golden opportunity to take the theme of that classic film and twist it into something new. From the beginning the connection with the Hitchcock masterpiece is obvious only instead of two strangers it's two female friends (actually three but only two are involved in the murder) and rather than a train setting it's one of the women's homes where the supposed pact is cemented.

Kristi (Yancy Butler) and Sheryl (Laura Soltis) are chums who are having problems with their husbands. A third friend Suzanne (Barbara Niven) is an attorney. Kristi believes her husband Dean (William deVry) to be cheating on her. Sheryl's husband, for some reason also named Dean (Bruce Boxleitner), a workaholic multi-millionaire has just informed his wife that he no longer loves her, wonders what he ever saw in the relationship, wants an immediate divorce, will give her a small settlement but no riches because of a prenuptial agreement. The two women are drinking when the conversation leads to how to dispose of the husbands. As in "Strangers on a Train," each agrees to kill the other's target, in this case the other's spouse. After she sobers up Kristi forgets the babble but Sheryl is dead serious and views the deal as a pact. In the meantime, Kristi confronts her husband with the evidence that he is having an extramarital affair. He is able to explain to Kristi's satisfaction that he only loves her. Kristi is happy but fails to tell Sheryl the reversal in her attitude about her husband. Sheryl proceeds to gun the bastard down, as she calls him. Once Kristi finds out what really happened and that now Sheryl expects her to kill the other husband, she confides in the two women's mutual friend Suzanne who advises Kristi to tell the police who are investigating the murder. Kristi explains that she is being blackmailed by Sheryl. So Suzanne places herself in harm's way by agreeing to help Kristi get the whole thing straightened out.

Since the viewer doesn't actually see Sheryl kill Kristi's husband--it's dark and only a shadowy figure is shown pulling the trigger--and since Sheryl's husband Dean brings out the point that his wife has a history of mental problems and drug dependency, it would have been a clever deviation from the original movie to have pointed the finger at others such as Suzanne or even Dean. But no. The writer/director George Erschbamer decides to stick to a copy of Hitchcock's film. So the movie plays out in a predictable manner.

There is also too much yakking in the script. I thought for awhile that the two friends would kill their husbands by talking them to death. The scene where Kristi and Sheryl plan the mutual murders is far too long, much to verbose. There is more action toward the end, but at times the talk still seems unending.

The acting is not bad for a TV film. Bruce Boxleitner is a capable actor and plays the part of a turd with élan. The three women in the lead roles are sufficient with perhaps the best performance given by Barbara Niven. At times the raspy voice of Yancy Butler is hard to hear. The entire cast is above average for this type movie.

If you're one of the few viewers who has never seen "Strangers on a Train," then you may enjoy this. Others beware. If you haven't seen Hitchcock's original, my advice is instead of watching this rehash, spend a little time finding "Strangers on a Train" at a video store and see it instead.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Very Bad Remake
lrcarlson22 October 2010
I watched this movie, because it's Friday night and it's Pick-A-Flick night on Lifetime Movie Channel. But 15 minutes into the movie, it was obvious that this was a remake of "Strangers on a Train." Having watched "Accidental Meeting" a few days ago - not a bad movie - I wasn't really in the mood to watch the same plot again, but I gave a try.

What a waste of time!

First, the writing was bad. The dialogue was inane, and unlike "Accidental Meeting," it didn't even make much sense. The writers didn't seem to know how they wanted to end this thing, and seemed to lose their own train of thought. Second, the acting was pretty bad. The delivery was flat and strained - but that's excusable, given the lines they had to deliver!

I usually enjoy Lifetime movies, except for the almost obligatory bedroom scenes, and I usually rate movies higher than the average, but I cannot recommend this at all, and a 3 is overly generous!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
You do mine and I'll do yours.
kapelusznik1818 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Very poor version of the Alfred Hitchcock 1951 classic "Strangers on a Train" has two feeling abused by their husbands women Kathy & Sheryl, Yancy Butler & Laurs Saltis, coming up with this plan to off them and make it look like they, the husbands, were killed by strangers by having air tight alibi's at the time of their murders. At first just talking about doing their husbands in Kathy finds that her so-called cheating husband Dean, William Davry, was in fact true to her and not the laying creep that she thought that he was. By then it was too late with Sheryl blasting him as he went out at night to take a puff from his Cuban cigar.

Now with Kathy having to keep her part of the bargain and whack Sheryl husband stock broker James, Bruce Boxleitner, she gets cold feet but is left hanging in that Sheryl has the goods on her, a secret tape recording, of her secretly and on tape planning her husband's-Dean-murder. Sheryl not letting things stay where they are and in danger of James divorcing her and leaving her penniless is now determined for Chathy to keep her part of the deal in knocking off James or else have her implicated in her own husband Dean's murder that she, Sheryl, in fact committed!

***SPOILERS*** With Cathy's good friend and legal adviser Suzanne, Barbara Niven, helping out she tried to get the evidence to prove that it was all Sheryl's fault in her husband's murder but is beaten to the punch by Sheryl getting her fingerprints on the murder weapon that Sherly used to blast her husband Dean! It was in fact Sheryl's drug addiction and whacked out mental state that in the end worked against her and exonerated Kathy in not only Dean but her own husband James murders. That's when Sheryl messed things up with James about to be killed by a very reluctant, with a gun to head, Cathy who made a brake for it and ended up getting shot and killed by Sheryl by,Ho Ho Ho, accident in all the confusion. Now exposed as both Dean & James murderess all Sheryl could now do is go completely nuts, as well as trying to murder both Kathy & Suzanne, to keep the truth of her actions from seeing the light of day. Only to be subdued, by the police, and sent to the nearest mental facility, not prison, for both confinement-for some 10 to 15 years- as well as for observation and mental treatment .
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Two women complain about their husbands, leading to a murder and blackmail
mlark413 October 2007
This movie was so bad it was laughable. I couldn't resist watching it though. The plot is standard, the acting quite horrible (supporting cast such as the nutty neighbor and the lawyer friend were better actors). Kind of amusing if you have some time to waste and like seeing the conclusion to a dramatic plot.

The headliner who plays "Kathy" was just fascinating because I couldn't decide if her deadpan, flat affect was the result of bad surgery or simply bad acting (I decided it was both). This leaves the script to comment on, which was pretty awful. Pat remarks, idiotic decisions, and reckless stupidity on the part of every character in the movie. Maybe this is what was so riveting; I don't know. I just watched it to see how bad it could be. (Actually the dialog doesn't even qualify to be called "cliche'" - but it's almost completely inane.)

All in all, very bad, cheaply made movie. The sets, the same scenes (a house, a building) were shown over and over with no artistry or actual tie-in to the action; more like props that were randomly dropped into the action in a bad play. A chase scene could have been shot by any juvenile in a warehouse or an old school: poorly shot, cheap props, minimal action.... and I still wanted to see the ending. Go figure.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
'Strangers on a Train' TV clone
vandino17 March 2006
This is a TV movie that aired on the Lifetime Network. It's just a variation on the old 'Strangers on a Train' story of two people pondering the removal of someone close to them (in this movie's case it's the husbands) and how that would improve their lives, then one of them goes off and kills the other's spouse then demands that her friend do the same for her in exchange. As in the original, the killer friend is a nutcase who continues to force the unwilling "partner" toward fulfilling the murder pact, otherwise be framed for the murder of her own husband. This film is such a retread it should pay royalties (or at least credit it) to the original writers. Story aside, the dialogue is pedestrian and the set up and follow through is clunky. Somehow we're supposed to believe that bad hubby Boxleitner, a multi-millionaire, can just hand his wife a quickie divorce settlement offer with a 24 hour deadline and she can't contest it. We're also supposed to believe that Yancy Butler's husband, shot dead in his backyard, might have been the victim of a "robbery gone wrong." Really.... one of those "Backyard Invasion Robberies" we hear about so often. They must have been after that fine cigar he was smoking. Anyway, this is just a mild entertainment not worth much notice, except as a comeback vehicle for the recently troubled Yancy Butler. She boozed her way out of the business for a few years and is trying to climb back in. Interesting that the pivotal "murder-the-spouses deal" scene is conducted with much wine drinking (not the real kind of course). Might have been a tough scene for Yancy to deal with. All the best to her, regardless. She is an interesting-looking (those eyes and brows) and sounding actress (that husky crackle).
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh Come On
dmorgan1215 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film has so little class in comparison to Strangers on a Train or even, Accidental Meeting for that matter, that despite plot similarities I wouldn't feel right in actually comparing this to either of them. The Yancy Butler character came across as such a dopey dimwit I was too embarrassed for the writer and director to continue watching.

I don't enjoy many Lifetime movies but feel compelled to watch one every now and then in the interest of promoting harmony at home. I often groan silently but this film caused me to protest out loud, stand up leave the room and walk around the house mumbling to myself, before I returned to my normally favorite chair to subject myself to more torture.

Dean Morgan, Rochester, NY
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Too Bad as Far as Remakes Go
Uriah4325 November 2021
Although her husband, "Dean Swanson" (William deVry) has cheated on her in the past, they have resolved their differences and "Kathy Swanson" (Yancy Butler) has found happiness in her marriage. The same cannot be said for her good friend "Sheryl" (Laura Soltis) who has just been asked for a divorce from her husband "James" (Bruce Boxleitner). Needless to say, both Kathy and her other good friend "Suzanne Debson" (Barbara Niven) reach out to Sheryl to extend their sympathies and lend their support during her time of emotional crisis. It's during this time that Kathy begins to suspect that Dean is cheating on her once again and needing to reach out to someone she goes to Sheryl's house to unwind. To her surprise, after several glasses of wine, Sheryl recommends that they each kill the other one's husband and Kathy-not realizing Sheryl is quite serious-laughingly agrees. Not long afterward, she is horrified to learn that Dean has indeed been murdered and that Sheryl is determined to have Kathy uphold her end of the supposed deal-or else an edited tape of their conversation will go to the police investigating the crime. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was obviously a remake of the Hitchcock classic "Strangers on a Train" and it suffers somewhat from the lack of originality along with the rather generic made-for-television format. On that note, the acting was adequate for the most part and, as far as remakes go, I suppose this one wasn't too bad and I have rated it accordingly. Average.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
YANCY!
skarylarry-9340014 May 2022
Yancyl Butler always has a sad look on her face like she's crying! This movie another variant of Hitchcock's STRANGERS ON A TRAIN! Not bad! Acting isn't terrible!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
modern day version of "strangers on a Train"(without the train,and a few other differences)i liked it
disdressed1223 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
from what i have read,this movie is basically"Strangers on Train"but without the train.the other difference(i'm sure there are more) is that the two women are not strangers,but friends.basically,Kathy Swanson(Yancy Butler) and her friend Sheryl(Laura Soltis)make a drunken deal to kill each other's husband's,in order to escape notice for the killings,since the police would have not be able to come up with a motive.from there,things go horribly wrong.many people say this is a clone of "Strangers on a Train"but that doesn't mean it's a bad movie.i thought it offers plenty of suspense and excitement.i also really like Yancy Butler.i think she's a very good actress.she's also very beautiful,in an exotic way.Howevr,in this movie,Laura Soltis,who plays Sheryl,steals the show as the villain.she is really nutso,this woman.it's a very compelling performance,in my opinion.i really liked this movie.if you like"strangers on a Train"you may or may not like this movie.it is updated for today's audiences ans i'm sure it's not exactly the same.anyway,liked it and give it 8.5/10
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed