Dievu miskas (2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
I was expecting better....
SimulacraLT31 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, i'm from Lithuania and movie made in our country is a really rare thing... All the people were expecting a miracle or a masterpiece, i guess, while they were waiting for the premiere. I was waiting too. But after all i can certainly state, that there was too much fuss about it. Although the shooting was good, I think they didn't convey the stories point (the film was based n a book B. Sruoga "The forest of gods"). The concentration camp itself was too soft - the prisoners lived there and that's it. The whole scenes were too dramatic - there's absolutely no such dramatism in the book. I read this book a long time ago, and it is was really good but the film is nothing what i imagined while reading the book. I think the director forgot about the main feature of the book - the irony, sometimes even black irony..

After all, i can't vote for this movie less than 7 points. This is very subjective because i was really happy to see a new Lithuanian film after a long time.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not that good...
caramel-61 October 2005
First of all, the movie doesn't have the same spirit as a book. There were no such irony and satire.. Well, you can find some funny moments, but the book is MUCH better, no doubt.

If not comparing with a book, the movie is still not that good. It's too lengthy & gets boring at some moments.

Besides the concentration camp is shown like a simple jail. I expected it to be more cruel. Prisoners always have cigarettes, they don't seem like starving, warders don't look so sadistic & so on.

All in all, if you are Lithuanian, you should watch this movie. But if you're not - you probably just find it boring.
31 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Strong and realistic film.
Kdosda_Hegen1 January 2021
This film is based on a slightly fictionised autobiography and reflects it very well. It's very sad and haunting film, with many interpretational elements. Some scenes are very artistic too. It's a very good arty film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Organic. Holocaust. Masterpiece
njumeil1 March 2008
First thing: this movie "based on the novel". BASED on the novel. So all those, that downrate it, because the movie does not follow beloved book, should start to learn separating one media from another.

There are no synthesized emotions in this. Everything feels real, or at least as real as the emotions in the diary of someone that is waiting for his days to end in concentration camp.

The main advantage of Puipa's masterpiece is this: There is no prejudice, no-goodie-white-hoodie and no evil-bad-wolf-hanibal-lector type characters. Everyone is show as a human. You will not feel sympathy for guards or collaborators, but you will understand things like "why do such people rise in times like this" or even start thinking about reasons that could turn good people into animals. Director won't tell you what to feel! It's such a rare feature, that it is hard to understand this concept at first.

There is some black humor in this movie too. It's dark, noir even, although it's so true, that it feels close even if you can't connect to WWII in any way.

Subtle details, real-life philosophy, humour, rich characters, absolutely stunning camera work makes this movie one of the best. It's not a fairy tale as Shindler's list is: you wont feel guilty if you are not crying in the end and everyone will understand why are you weeping if you do.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Recommended
kasyrabl23 September 2005
Hello everybody, I'm from Lithuania, the country where this movie was made :) Although I haven't seen it yet, I've read the book, which the movie is based on, "Balys Sruoga - Dievu Miskas" (Forest of the Gods) several times and the least I can say is that it's absolutely wonderful, capturing the cruelties of the concentration camp with subtle black humour and irony. Especially when describing the main "bad guys" (gards, authority of the camp). As you may know the book which the movie is based on is an autobiography of the author Balys Sruoga, he suffered in this camp and survived, then wrote a book. Not sure how good the movie is, but judging from the book it should be a masterpiece. Obviously, this movie should be viewed in original Lithuanian language for maximum effect, because sometimes, well most of the time, the subtitles are somewhat terrible. That'll be all,sorry for mistakes if any :)
33 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far too long
briancham19945 August 2020
The main problem with this film is the plodding pace. It's just so slow and long! For a war film, that's hard to accept. The historical context is interesting but this film did not do it as much justice as it deserves. There are moments that propel the plot and kept my interest but overall I would say this is a better sleeping aid than a film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Be prepared to be disappointed (or not)
briedytea18 November 2021
I have read the novel by Balys Sruoga "Forest of the Gods" twice. Now I watched the movie. For those who also read the book, will surely understand how poor this movie is written/directed compared to the book. Of course, movies shouldn't be copies of the original, BUT it's really important to understand WHY people like the original in the first place! It's the ability to look at such horrific events with irony. The movie tries to look more serious and grotesque than the book and that fails. Also, because there aren't many witty remarks from the book, the film tends to be so slow and boring. I personally found only one interesting thing about the movie - the ending. The ending is so powerful, especially when you know the biography of the author. How hard it was for him to get the book published, that Sruoga didn't even get to see his own autobiographical novel get published due to the Soviet Union restrictions. All in all, I don't recommend watching the film if you read the book, because your expectations will be too high. I wouldn't recommend watching it without reading the book either, because maybe it can leave an impression on the viewer that the book is similar. BELIEVE ME, THE BOOK IS 100% WORTH IT. Please form an opinion just after reading the book, because I know people who disliked the book, it really depends on the individual.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
yet another downfall of LT cinema
Tummytumtum26 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The book is by far one of the greatest feats of irony ever put down on paper. I have read it, enjoyed it and plan to recommend it to many people. I usually judge a film by its music in the first 5 seconds or so and was quite excited when I saw the Napoleonic view of soldiers and heard the daunting orchestra; but once the narrator started speaking, my first thought was "I have not sat down to see O.K. theatre." Ninety-five percent of the actors in this film seem unnatural, like they're reading the Illiad, or maybe on stage in "Shopping and F-ing." And yet again, Lithuanians simply cannot produce a movie that is actually movie-like. Maybe its just me, and others enjoy the acting-with-your-voice technique, but it is tiresome to hear the same overly-dramatic intonations coming from artificially-emotional faces. I would really like to see a Lithuanian movie which even remotely mirrors natural countenance. I also wanted to see something of a Fellini-style to highlight the irony of Sruoga. But no irony here. The images were also not impressive. Moreover, It did bother me how the prisoners sat around smoking and drinking, showering extensively with hot water (judging from the steam) and gazing out the windows. I know that Puipa could not include everything, but this time, he chose the wrong things to bring out. I would never exhibit this film to my foreign friends as an example of Lithuanian cultural life.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Read the novel first, then don't watch the movie
clockwisecloud30 August 2005
One of the greatest directors of Lithuanian cinema - Algimantas Puipa. One of the greatest novels - "The Forest of Gods" by Lithuanian writer Balys Sruoga. One of the worst screenings ever.

A true story about a professor who struggled with the inhumanity of Nazi in one of their death camps (Stuthof). Irony was the only weapon he had. "I laugh a lot during hard moments. I am deeply ironic - not to the people I'm going to die with, but to the whole wide world." - wrote Balys Sruoga in a letter to his wife from Stuthof death camp in 1944. The novel is a masterpiece, however, the movie - far from it: unnatural dialogs, forced acting.
55 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
5 from 10
sulaniuxa9 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
it is Lithuanian movie. as we all know it is small country and we can not create such big movies as titanic. but this is normal movie. i think they should choose another title for it and absolutely other characters because after reading book you want only cry from disappointment when you finish to watch movie. it is far from book... book to read i was so interested and watch movie very bored. the main actor was not realistic. i think there had to be another, because in scenes where he had to be near death and sick he was looking more healthy than any other man in this world. again i say it is far from book... sad
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed