San Pietro (TV Movie 2005) Poster

(2005 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Interesting retelling at the life and teachings of St. Peter from a Biblical , historical and religious view point
ma-cortes23 July 2019
Expensively mounted Biblical production with mostly Italian star-cast and spectacularly filmed in Italy , but overlong , in fact the length of this TV movie runs 4 hours and 25 minutes . Two men changed the world forever : Jesus Christ and his main disciple : St Peter . A colorful version of Peter's life with a true epic treatment and following the Catholic canon and being marvellously shot . Peter was considered along with James the Just and John the Apostle as pillars of the Church .The leadership of Peter forms the basis of the Apostolic succession and the institutional power of orthodoxy, and is described as "the rock" on which the church will be built. Catholics refer to him as chief of the Apostles . As Peter is always listed first among the Twelve Apostles in the gospels and in the Book of Acts . Peter is often depicted in the gospels as spokesman of all the Apostles . He is also frequently mentioned in the gospels as forming with James the Elder and John a special group within the Twelve Apostles, present at incidents at which the others were not present, such as at the Transfiguration of Jesus, at the raising of Jairus' daughter and at the agony in the Garden of Gethsemane , Death and Resurrection . As Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians contains a list of resurrection appearances of Jesus, the first of which is an appearance to Peter . In John's Gospel, Peter is the first person to enter the empty tomb, although the women and the beloved disciple see it before him . And of course , all four canonical gospels recount that, during the Last Supper, Jesus foretold that Peter would deny him three times before the following cockcrow ("before the cock crows twice" in Mark's account). According to Christian tradition, Peter was crucified in Rome under Emperor Nero.He is traditionally counted as the first Bishop of Rome-or pope-and also by Eastern Christian tradition as the first Patriarch of Antioch. The ancient Christian churches all venerate Peter as a major saint and as the founder of the Church of Antioch and the Roman Church. This highly regarded epic deals with a dramatic recreation of the life of St. Peter from his meeting with Jesus . Through miracles , Jesus succeeds in allaying the doubts of Simon the Fisher called Peter (Omar Shariff) and even those of Thomas, the skeptic , and shortly after , Matthew the tax collector who becomes a follower of Jesus, despite the other disciples' mistrust . Jesus Christ's (Johannes Brandrup) journey from Galilee to Golgotha is portrayed here in thought-provoking as well as original treatment by using some flashbacks . Including Christ evangelization , Crucifixion , Resurrection , through the Ascention and the renewal of Pentecost. Concerning about the wonderful life, work and death of Peter , a reluctant but passionate leader , as we know it from the Bible , adding his relation to St. Paulus (Daniele Pecci) Virgen Maria , Christ's Mother (Lina Sastri) , Maria Magdalena (Milena Miconi) and other Apostles : Mattias (Lionello) , Barnabe (Mariani) , Filippo (Abenayake) ... The film includes all of the major events referred to in the New Testament with descriptive Biblical passages from the crucifixion of Jesus to his own, his life in Jerusalem , Antioch , and Rome where Peter knows he has a destiny to fulfill. The film's first half dramatizes the New Testament's "Acts": early fear, as his followers disciples are already slowly beginning to gather around him , Saul's conversion, the decision to baptize pagans, and his relationship to other apostles and so on and finally the Apostles' dispersal. Peter went to Antioch where Paul rebuked him for following the conservative line regarding the conversion of Gentiles, having meals separate from Gentiles . Subsequent tradition held that Peter had been the first Patriarch of Antioch. Later on , Peter and Paul founded the Church of Rome and the Church of Corinth, and they have lived in Corinth for some time, and definitively in Italy where they found death and there Paul wrote his Epistle to the Romans about AD 57 . In the second half, an elderly Peter goes to Rome to join Paul, bringing to the Eternal City the Christian teachings and arriving on the day of Paul's arrest. Paul's death brings a crisis to Rome's Christians and to Peter ; lessons from Jesus's teachings guide his decision to stay. The apocryphal Acts of Peter is the source for the tradition about the Latin famous phrase "Quo vadis, Domine?" which means "Where are you going, Lord?". According to the story, Peter, fleeing Rome to avoid execution meets the risen Jesus. In the Latin translation, Peter asks Jesus, "Quo vadis?" He replies "I am going to Rome to be crucified again". Peter then gains the courage to continue his ministry and returns to the city, where he is martyred . Early Church Tradition says that Peter probably died by crucifixion (with arms outstretched) at the time of the Great Fire of Rome in the year 64. This took place three months after the disastrous fire that destroyed Rome for which the emperor (Nero) wished to blame the Christians. This "dies imperii" (regnal day anniversary) was an important one, exactly ten years after Nero ascended to the throne, and it was 'as usual' accompanied by much bloodshed. Traditionally, Roman authorities sentenced him to death by crucifixion. In accordance with the apocryphal Acts of Peter, he was crucified head down.Tradition also locates his burial place where the Basilica of Saint Peter was later built, directly beneath the Basilica's high altar .

Breathtaking story set in Christ times with emphasis in religious motives , lavish costumes and crowds . This is an impressive story of the life of St. Peter filmed on a relatively grand scale , being efficiently directed by Giulio Base . However , not completely reverential at some Biblical characters . Life of Peter is intelligently told , including glowing cinematography by Giovanni Galasso , an attractive visual style , memorable soundtrack by Marco Frisina and decent cast giving larger-than-life interpretation . Sensitive though aged Omar Shariff in exactly the right role , he gives a dedicated effort at the character , his acting has power , nobility, subtlety and sensibility . However , some scenarios and outdoors lack of authenticity and unrealistic , being extremely green and lush .
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Excellent story, but too long!!!
mistymountain5 September 2007
THE PROS OF THIS MOVIE: All-star cast line-up: Omar Shariff, Flavio Insinna, Lina Sastri, Milena Miconi. The legendary Omar Shariff gives a magnificent performance as Saint Peter, and this is the FIRST film that I ever saw him act. His final scene in the film is extremely touching. Flavio Insinna shines as David, the Roman slave Gladiator fighting for his family's freedom. It's always a joy to see him act in a fatherly role. His interaction with the children is extremely heartwarming, and his scenes with his wife, Anna, are beautiful. Omar and Flavio's scenes together is wonderful. Their interaction has such chemistry which really brings out the best in this film. Lina Sastri and Milena Miconi, who also worked with Flavio respectively in Don Bosco and Don Matteo, played their parts superbly. Lina's performance as the Virgin Mary was impeccable, and Milena Miconi, who I almost didn't recognize, because of her red hair dyed black, beautifully portrayed Mary Magdalene.

THE CONS OF THIS MOVIE: First, the movie's 197 minutes long, and usually I don't have an attention span past 2 hours. Second, Flavio doesn't appear until the second half of the film, and he's like the third person listed in the credits, which is the only reason why I even bothered to watch this film. Third, Flavio, Lina and Milena's voices were all DUBBED!!!!! The whole point of me watching this film was to hear Flavio's NATURAL voice!!!!! They hired some macho voice-over to dub Flavio's voice.

Overall, the movie is wonderful to watch, but some scenes they could've done without. The actor who portrayed Jesus was fantastic. This was an excellent production done by Rai and Lux Vide.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good Story
billcr1228 June 2020
Omar Sharif is excellent in this biblical epic as Saint Peter. He is shown from the beginning as an early follower of Jesus of Nazareth. The script is faithful to the New Testament description of Peter's life as the orignal founder of Christianity. It runs a bit too long at over three and a half hours but EWTN ran it over the span of two Saturdays. The scenery is breathtaking and the acting good throughout. Sharif is perfectly suited for the role. I recommend this film for even lapsed Catholics such as myself.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
seductive
Vincentiu12 April 2015
at first sigh- a biblical movie as many others. at the second - a touching story who gives to Omar Sharif the opportunity to build a special character, exploring its nuances, proposing a different Peter, using sensitivity for create not only the image of the Apostle but, more important, powerful silence's slices. a film who not convince but reminds. a film about mission, duty, choice and sacrifice. the delicacy of Peter's portrait is the great virtue of a film who propose a different manner to discover Jesus. a film about purpose of life, it is almost a kind of poem. for its music, for landscapes and for the role of nuances. interesting. and useful. powerful. and seductive. a film who reminds the old art of Omar Sharif in inspired manner.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Peter, Brother of the Lord.
tmcgrath2626 October 2022
I really enjoyed San Pieter. Omar Shariff is excellent and for me it's one of his best performances! Although not the best of movies technically, however this movie does portray the important aspects of St Peter and who this man was. Omar, although playing a Peter much older than the Peter in the Gospels, shows the passion and love he had for Jesus. And his desire to evangelize to the world. I saw the 2 hour version of Santa Pietro versus the 4 1/2 version but it covers the high pets of Peters journey from denier to evangelize. The other actors do a great job also. I think you will enjoy this movie.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Omar Sharif gives a good performance in a film marred by bad dubbing.
watrousjames17 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The late great Omar Sharif, who was quite a good actor, gave a good performance in this film as St. Peter. Sadly, the film was marred by bad dubbing. This film was made for Italian television in 2005. I think Sharif did his lines in English, but most of the actors did theirs in Italian. The dubbing wasn't very good. Some of the voice actors used for dubbing into English weren't really good actors either. This might be a better film if it was in Italian and subtitled. There were aspects of the film I thought could be better. Saul/Paul starts persecuting the Church much to early, actually before Pentecost. In reality Saul/Paul persecuted the church 3-5 years after Jesus' crucifixion. They also combine two times that Peter is imprisoned and escaped, probably for time constraint. Stephen's defense and his stoning were too rushed. There was an aspect of the film I did like, which was Peter's relationship to the other Apostles and to Paul, after his conversion. The film even portrays Peter being at Paul's trial and execution. In reality, it's possible it could've happened, but it's also quite possible it didn't. Also ,I liked Peter's relationship to Jesus at the beginning of the film and shown in flashbacks throughout the film. Most of the last part of the movie is a fictionalized account of Peter in Rome ministering to the Christians living there. Some aspects of this worked better than others. Such as Paul's friendship to a Christian family that are slaves to a Roman official works fairly well. But a romance between the Roman official's son and a Christian woman does not work as well. It's worthwhile seeing once for Omar Sharif's performance. In fact I gave the film a 6/10 because of his performance. I would have given it a higher score if it didn't have so many flaws. It would be better if it was either in Italian and subtitled or redubbed with better voice actors.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant movie filled with Christian joy and love
marcin_kukuczka25 May 2006
"One heart, one soul"

These words that appear many times in the magnificent latest movie by Giulio Base are not just the words that relate to early Christian attitude but they are clearly reflected throughout the film made with honest effort and great faith both from the crew and the cast. I have seen many religious historical epics. Nevertheless, I have to admit that seldom have I seen such a purely faithful movie where almost each moment is an experience. Let me discuss some of the aspects of the film that make it a brilliant piece of film art.

CONTENT: Giulio Base's film can be divided into two parts concerning the content. The first part discusses purely historical events from the New Testament, beginning with the death and resurrection of Christ and going on to Apostles' meetings, conversions to the new faith, quarrels who actually has the right to be baptized, persecutions from Jews, the miraculous story of Saul/Paul, and ending with Peter's journey to the heart of the empire, Rome. The events showed in the second part take place primarily in Rome, with some fictitious characters that are contextualized in the whole life stories of Peter and Paul. We see two families whose lives are connected by love and faith. Claudius Maximus (Ettore Basi), the son of a wealthy Roman, Persius (Ennio Caltorti), falls in love with a Christian girl Silvia (Bianca Guaccero). He does not see any benefit in the new faith at first but slowly starts to believe in the Son of God. Will this help him retain good relations with his family? Moreover, a mystery from his family's past is revealed at the moment of the death of Claudius' Grandma... In the other family, David (Flavio Insinna), the masked gladiator called Trachus, fights on arena as a gladiator. However, he hides this truth from his Christian wife, Anna (Claudia Koll). Yet, his life in two worlds cannot last forever and he once has to stand before the choice... earthly or spiritual freedom?... Among these vivid stories, the director shows Peter-Paul relations. Sometimes, they are exaggerated because these two have not met so many times and probably died on the same day not having met in prison before. Yet, it must be treated rather in the symbolic way. The primary fact about them is that they were the two greatest Apostles of Christ's Church. In the end, we see the persecutions of Christians and Peter who leaves Rome and meets the Lord on his way who is going to be crucified again...

BEAUTIFUL MOMENTS: The film is filled with a number of magnificent scenes that I deeply experienced to tears. If you decide to see the movie, pay attention to little aspects that are perhaps not so clear at once but noticed after a longer inspection. These aspects, which I noticed at the second viewing, are the real pearls of the film. These are, among many others, the visit at Cornelius' in Caesarea, the Eucharist in prison, the symbolic moment of joy at Christ's resurrection, the conversation with a prostitute ("Is there really such a God who will forgive?") or Paul's miraculous way for Damascus. Except for the above, I will never forget Sylvia-Claudius conversation in his beautiful gardens. "What do you lack? What more is there that can make you happy? asks Claudius. Immediately, the question is answered by a voice coming from the streets of Rome "Jesus is true happiness!" I also loved the moment of retrospection in time. Peter decides to put up his mission in Rome but unintentionally comes back in memory to the words of Christ: "You are the rock and on this rock I shall build my Church". The end is also unbelievably beautiful and touching, which refers to one historical and spiritual fact: Rome has changed forever and the whole world will never be the same since the Redeemer makes all things new...

CAST: Among the films about Peter's elderly years in Rome, Omar Sharif portrays the fishermen of people in the most memorable way I have seen so far: better than Dennis Quiley in A.D (1985), more authentic than Franciszek Pieczka in QUO VADIS? (2000), even more appealing than Finlay Currie in Hollywood's monumental production QUO VADIS? (1951) by Mervyn LeRoy. He is great with that blink in his eyes that probably real saint Peter had and at showing love for all men that real saint Peter learned from his Lord. Omar Sharif is magnificent and even if you are not religious, you will love this film thanks to his performance. Other cast are not that famous but they give fine performances, too. I particularly liked Bianca Guaccero in the role of gentle young girl Silvia, so in love with Claudius. Among others, these are Italian cast who very well fit to the roles of the Romans.

LOCATIONS: There is one more reason why I like the movie. The landscapes that the film shows are very much like the ones in Palestine. After my journey to the Holy Land, I deeply feel this sense of authenticity. Therefore, some biblical films seemed so unnatural because they were made in wrong locations. Giulio Base's film does a great job throughout, including the Sea of Galilee, Capernaum, the reconstruction of the Jerusalem and the Rome of the 1st century. So far, such an authentic film concerning locations was Franco Zeffirelli's production with Robert Powell.

I would recommend everyone to see this film, no matter if old or young, Christian, Jew or Muslim, believer or atheist. It is a splendid film which is not a "Christian propaganda" as some cynical people unjustly call such films. It is the film which primarily focuses on the dignity, freedom and love of every human being. 10/10 Excellent movie that I dream to see for the third time!
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Remarkable film
markdunlop14 September 2013
A remarkable realistic portrayal of the life of St. Peter by the brilliant actor Omar Sharif. Also follows the conversion and ministry of St. Paul. Recounting well the struggles and trials of early Christians in the Roman Empire. The film takes one from the crucifixion of Jesus Christ to the execution of St. Paul and eventual crucifixion of St. Peter. Exceptionally well directed and acted by all characters. Sharif is convert to Islam from having been raised a Coptic Christian. One may only speculate how this deeply moving Christian role has affected him personally. Sadly, some intolerant Muslims are calling for his death for appearing in this religious role. Highly recommended film for people of all faiths and persuasions.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
In Short: The film is about the life of the early Church after Jesus' Crucifixion and how St. Peter led them until his death in Rome
subfour16004 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I'm sorry to burst any religious bubbles here, but it was one of the most disappointing portrayals of this amazing time of Church history I have ever seen. I was very excited when I saw this film in the video store and with Easter coming up. I thought it would be a very appropriate for the time of year. I also was excited to see Omar Sharif as St. Peter and I thought this movie was going to be pretty good. Omar Sharif didn't disappoint, however, just about everything else did. With one exception: The cinematography, which was quite beautiful at times.

However the acting was terrible. I was trying to figure out why their voices were out of sync, and I thought, "Oh well it's an Italian film." But Sharif's mouth as did other actor's seemed to be speaking English. There are few who looked like they were speaking another language (assume Italian) hence the dub, but the majority was terribly out of sync. It's listed as an English speaking film, so I don't know what happened. To be honest, I think "The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly" was in better sync.

The direction was something to be desired. It almost seemed as if the director Giulio Base did one take on everything and said, "That'll work, let's fix it in post if needed". When it seemed that Base was trying to create an "individual moment", it only worked because of Sharif. However, with the dubbing/sync issues some of it was absolutely laughable. Especially whenever the character Mark (Possibly the Gospel Author) would cry (Which seemed to be more than my 3 year old daughter). It just wasn't believable.

The story itself seemed relevant and historically plausible until we get to Rome and we're introduced to a fictional, forbidden, love story and to a fictional slave family, whose father is a masked gladiator. This is when the wheels fell off completely for me. The story moves into the realm of nonsense and it's unclear what is fact and what is fiction. In Rome, all of a sudden these two fictionalized B & C story lines are introduced after almost 90 minutes into the film. I didn't care about these people, I cared about Peter and Paul and wanted to know what happened to them, the other stories just seemed thrown in there by a studio or executive producers thinking we needed a love story. It was a distraction rather than an enhancement.

If one of the underlying objectives of this film is to show Rome and St. Peter as the beginning of the Papacy and the establishment of the Holy See then this fictional tale of this family and the two forbidden lovers just deflates the authority of this story. In addition, the gladiator fight scenes looked like two 10 year-olds playing Power Rangers on their front lawn. The "out of the blue" conversion at the end of the Roman official who hated Peter and resisted Christianity the whole time is never addressed, but he's given the final words as St. Peter hangs from the cross to the effect, "All of Rome has changed because of you Peter". Why on earth would you allow that, in addition to people just sitting around as if Peter is being crucified in their living room? If this happened like this I don't know, but due to above mentioned fictional aspects of the film I doubt the scenes accuracy. The only aspect that I do know was true was Peter being crucified upside down and the words he used, which were beautiful "I am not worthy to die in same manner as our Lord".

I don't even want to get started on the editing, which had no rhythm and pulled us out of scenes like smelling salt did to Apollo Creed in Rocky I & II. Editor Alessandro Lucidi as is Base, is no strangers to this genre. However if the director doesn't give you anything to cut out from to cut to then you're stuck with what you have I guess.

The story was too spoon fed for me, almost written for a 12 year old audience. I would recommend the film for Catholic school students grades 4th – 8th. I don't think a lot of Evangelicals or Protestants would approve of the story due to its portrayal (however true it may be) of the establishment of Rome as the "Heart of Christ Church" as Sharif's St. Peter put it. However, maybe somehow the Holy Spirit can overcome the obstacles of this film and deliver the message it was trying to make to those mentioned above. I just think the filmmakers missed a great opportunity to deliver a powerful and true story. Peter and Paul keep talking about "The Truth" but in the context of this film "The Truth" comes into question. I have feeling the producers might have come into the edit bay after the director's cut and really messed this film up, because I can't buy that Base would make the decisions he made.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautifully shot film about early Christianity...
mtr011816 August 2007
After seeing the 1981 made for TV film PETER AND PAUL, I wondered if any one could match or remake the story of early Christianity as adequately as SAINT PETER. Omar Sharif wasn't as bad as Peter like in the other biblical films he was been in in recent years. Johannes Brandhupp's Christ was OK after a fine performance in the resurrection scenes.The background and music was great.They should of shown a little bit more about Peter's relationship with Jesus much before his crucifixion.If you liked this film, you should watch PAUL THE APOSTLE and also THE APOCALPYSIS(Richard Harris). RAI LUX-VIDE really knows how to do biblicals.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very bad
archive-823252 April 2020
The acting is awful. Poor makeup and costumes. Background and props are terrible. This seemed like a very bad high school play.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great film..few issues...
mvike17 November 2019
This movie was really great, especially the man who played Peter, and the woman who played Silvia. The sets I never much noticed which overall is good, because like good CGI, if it's good you shouldn't really "notice" ...really I loved everything about this, except for two things...well 3..

1) the audio sync was off enough to notice it pretty easily, I was glad to know it wasn't my Xbox messing up at least..?

2) the man who played Paul was...ill just say he was a cheesey goofball.

3) the man who played Jesus looked like a TOTAL creep, I just don't get why everyone looks right...and then Jesus is always a hippy from San Diego, California. I half except him to have crocs on his feet. I get that Jesus was a small role in this but man he looked like a creeper!!

Besides those 3 things? Which all were fairly minor...I really loved this. I loved EVERY MOMENT that Peter was on screen...even with Paul being my favorite of the Ways early followers!!

I don't think I'd advise NEW Christians or Non-Belivers to watch it, as one group will find it a bit too removed from Christ, while the other group will find it boring.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
beautiful
Kirpianuscus26 May 2016
Omar Shariff does a good job. that is the first verdict after the end of film. a film who propose , in 197 minutes, not a religious lesson but a circle of stories. and who propose a different Saint Peter, more humble, kind and, maybe, wise. it is touching and convincing. it is beautiful and credible. and propose an inspired manner to discover the Christianity in its essence. that is the rare gift who impose this film as a trip in the manner to assume the faith. Saint Peter of Omar Shariff is vulnerable and looking the right answer to his brothers and sisters in faith. he becomes a guide for community as result of his fear, doubts, need to be the disciple of the Lord who is not only the model but the only real solution to assume the challenges.and that does Peter not the first Pope, the saint or the first apostle but a kind of country priest from the novel of Bernanos. his success is different by the character of the French writer. the purpose is the same. and that detail does the film beautiful. the dialog, the patience, the atmosphere, not real different by the atmosphere of many Christian films but more subtle and warm for send the message in right manner. a film about the build of faith. and the birth of Church.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
who played Cornelius and Lucius?
valecnik28 June 2020
Does anybody know who played Cornelius and soldier Lucius? I can't find them mentioned anywhere, not even under "full cast" view... :(
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you expect a faithful telling of Peter from Acts, look elsewhere
tjbrown5279 December 2007
I gave this 1 star...and the real Apostle Peter would have no doubt given it none. It was rarely faithful to the Book of Acts in any specifics, more than not going of on wild tangents.

My wife rented this from netflix. The description said it was made for Italian TV, but I didn't do the math...this would appear to be a Roman Catholic based film. Portraying Peter as the "rock" that the Church was built on, mechanical repetition of the Lord's Prayer, the constant recital of the Sermon on the Mount and not the Gospel (which is what was done in Acts).

The lip syncing bothered me as did some of the acting and editing, but the content is what really bothers me. As has been mentioned before, this really went wacko when they got to Rome.

If this were a BIBLICALLY ACCURATE movie, I could easily sit for three hours, but this was a waste of time.

If you want an accurate portrayal of the Apostles, get the Acts series from "The Visual Bible".

This was basically a ride through fantasyland.
9 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Admire Actor Omar Sheriff Again
jdianahall27 March 2021
As a fan of Omar Sheriff, I was delighted to find this 2005 film in which he portrays a confused, penitent and endearing Peter. Yes, the film is long. But the length enables us to get to know the early followers of Jesus that are named in the Gospels/Acts. And we meet other imagined followers with whom we can identify in experiencing their fears and frustrations. The vast array of characters can become somewhat confusing since they are intermixed with events depicted in biblical stories through flashbacks into differing time periods. But the whole film succeeds in drawing us into the personal challenges of the earliest Christians.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This movie was not a good adaptation but it was the effort that counted.
Lee_Letta16 September 2012
This movie was not a good adaptation but it was the effort that counted. Why don't they get actual Jews to these movies? There were a lot of important pieces that should have been here. I know that time was an issue, but some events should have been included. The actions or events that Peter witnessed should have been included. The exact portrayal of how Cornelius and his family was saved was inaccurate in this movie. John the Baptist and the Apostles did full submersions according to the Jewish ritual for cleanliness, but this movie did what some Roman do which is baptize by sprinkling. Any movie that is made to honor the Lord should be close to scripture so that if non-believers see it, they can get a sense of what the Bible speaks.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This has made me understand the Bible and life after Jesus died. So beautiful movie just amazed.
idemonkilla16 January 2024
Love this movie it is just like a gospel. So much to learn . The life of apostles after the death of Jesus. This movie help me restore my faith. ONE HEART ONE SOUL... what a line by st peter in this movie. I wish this movie is released again with another promotion trust me it can be as big as passion of Christ.

I have seen so many biblical movies but none can be compared to the effect it leaves on your heart and mind. The role played by st peter and st paul was too good. St peter and st paul are truely our Iron man . I respect them so much more after watching this movie. Reading bible first and watching this film just makes it better.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
hmmmm....horrible acting except for Omar Sharif....I can't believe the producer won an award for this travesty!!
pharoa224 November 2010
good things about this movie...Peter's acting is really amazing and believable (most of the time) and scenery, camera action and music are better than mediocre...

bad things: ACTING....OMG it is terrible!!! I have never seen a movie with that horrible acting...from Paul, Silvia, Fulvia, Jesus (who looks like a Dracula)...all the extras sucked ...along with the fakest crying and screaming I have ever seen!! Audio-Video Synch....WOW!!! soooo annoying enough said... Acting Voices...some of the actors' voices don't match the way the look, react or behave...or even the way they express their emotions... Direction of movie....it's like the Acts that you never read! really who wrote this script!!! and a love story that I could never find in any documented Christian book or history!!!

BOTTOM LINE: ITALIANS SHOULD NOT DIRECT English MOVIES!!!!
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed