Next (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
274 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
magic to do
blanche-226 January 2013
Nicholas Cage, Julianne Moore, and Jessica Biel star in "Next," a 2007 action film directed by Lee Tamahori and written by Gary Goldman, Jonathan Hensleigh, and Paul Birnbaum.

Cris Johnson (Cage) is a magician named "Frank Cadillac." What people don't know is that Johnson has a unique gift: he can see up to two minutes into the future as long as it impacts him personally. There is just one exception: the girl of his dreams (Biel). He's seen her and he's waiting to meet her.

Johnson has come to the attention of the FBI, led by Moore. There is a nuclear munitions shipping coming into the U.S., and they want Johnson's helping in locating it. One night, in a casino, he overcomes a would-be robber and grabs his gun, as he saw into the future when the man not only robbed the casino, but shot the young woman at the payout window. However, the police attempt to arrest him, thinking the gun is his; the FBI knows differently. With his two-minute warnings, Johnson is able to get away in a stolen car and go officially on the run. Not only does the FBI want him, but the munitions people as well.

I found this film very entertaining with some neat effects as it plays with past and future, sometimes advancing the plot ahead by mere seconds. Nicholas Cage is always great, and he is here as the beleaguered magician who has come to the attention of the casino because they suspect him of cheating.

It's a good cast, and the late Peter Falk has a cameo, another treat.

I didn't catch the reviews when this film came out nor did I do more than glance at a few here on IMDb. But this is an action film. In action films, one enjoys the action and doesn't dwell on the plot nor delve too deeply into it. After all, the basic premise and action sequences in some of these films can be absurd. So just go with it and have fun. That's what I do, anyway.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
an entertaining mind bending thriller
dustinhunter7072 October 2007
I am a Nicolas Cage fan and the only movie that he has been in that sucked was The Wicker Man so I knew this movie would be pretty good and it was. You never see the twists coming very often in this movie and to be able to see your future and change it like that would be really cool for any of us. Julianne Moore and Jessica Biel were pretty good in this film too. I enjoyed it and it didn't bore me, but neither did the director's other two action films that I watched which were Die Another Day and XXX 2: State of the Union. I have heard some weird things about the director, but he knows how to make a good movie, thats all I know. Overall I give this a 7 out of 10 because it was pretty good but it wasn't perfect or anything. I would recommend it to sci-fi and thriller fans most definitely though.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mining Another Philip K. Dick Story
atlasmb23 May 2014
"Next" comes from a story written by Philip K. Dick, like many clever film titles in the last thirty years. Once again, he takes a simple idea--an alternate reality, if you will--and creates with it an engaging drama.

The film involves a variation on time travel. More correctly, it involves multiple realities/universes. Nicholas Cage plays Chris Johnson aka Frank Cadillac, a small-time Las Vegas magician who makes his real money at the gaming tables. He has a special talent: he can look two minutes into his future to see the outcomes of his various potential actions.

This talent has put him in the cross hairs of the FBI and others. The feds (especially the team lead by a special agent played by Julianne Moore) want him to help them thwart the nefarious plans of terrorists. But Chris has suffered enough prodding at the hands of the authorities during his life.

The narrative has fun with the idea of multiple realities, often fooling the viewer. Amidst the chase scenes are numerous chances to question the boundaries of the magician's "powers". The special effects used to portray his options are enjoyable.

The wild card is an attractive young woman named Liz Cooper (Jessica Biels) who enters his consciousness. Chris is drawn to this mysterious woman, especially since her presence seems to alter his abilities.

I can't say Nicholas Cage would be my first choice for this role, but he plays it well enough. Jessica Biels is fun to watch and believable. Julianne Moore does a good job of riding the line between hard-nosed agent and considerate person.

I feel sure some people will not like the ending. And those who prefer to detect plot holes rather than enjoy the ride may not find much enjoyment at all.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Far more than I expected
SquirePM5 May 2007
Next is a much better movie than I expected to see, having read some of the reviews which called it disjointed and silly. Quite to the contrary, I found it deeply absorbing. I quickly picked up on the elements which must have caused some reviewers to accuse it of being disjointed, and began enjoying them. Of course silliness is part of any sci-fi story, we suspend our critical senses in that regard or we do not become sci-fi fans.

I single out one performer among a fine cast. Julianne Moore has really established herself as *the* deadpan action queen. She was a better Agent Starling than Jody Foster was, and she's a terrific, dominant presence in this film. Kudos to her for propelling herself to the top of a tough genre. She makes films more interesting to watch, by dint of her strong performances.

I read Phillip K. Dick's "The Golden Man" many years ago and still remember a lot of it. When I first began hearing about this movie I immediately flashed to it and wondered if this was a movie of that intriguing story. The answers are "yes" and "no." "The Golden Man" is a much more ordinary story, but with resounding insights on the consequences of his existence. And his skin was a compellingly attractive rich golden hue, which helped make him irresistible to women. None of that fits this new story, and was properly omitted.

What is translated so well from the written page to the screen is the government's intense interest in him (although for different reasons), its efforts to get him under official control, and the exceeding difficulty of doing so. And of course, the story ends in a wholly different way than the movie, a very satisfying and inevitable conclusion that bolsters Mr. Dick's reputation for opening the future to us.

*** OK, ONE LITTLE SPOILER ALERT *** READ NO FURTHER (unless you don't mind) ***

I just have to add, the flurry of action sequences which come like a staccato rendition of The Flight Of The Bumblebee during his escape from custody, is thoroughly delectable and brought more than one involuntary "Ha!" from the audience I saw it with, including from me. It's one of the tastiest treats in the film.

And finally, yes, I too wish I knew who the heck these terrorists were and what the heck they were trying to accomplish with their nefarious plot. But I guess that's the brave new world we live in. We just don't get to hear the bad guys' dialogue, their reasons for doing the things they do. In that way Next is giving us another insight, not dropping us cold as others have complained. The only legitimate beef I agree with is the entirely unnecessary and just plain goofy Nicholas Cage business during the final pursuit. It looks like it must have been an idea of somebody too high up among the moguls to deny, but it is a definite distraction causing "Huh? What?" moments when the action is at its most intense.

All in all, a feather in everybody's cap and a movie I fully recommend without reservation. Drama, humor, really fine action sequences, twists, great characters. As baseball great Yogi Berra once said, " Don't miss it if you can."
198 out of 283 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Good Idea from Philip K. Dick Slips Away in the Script
gradyharp29 September 2007
Philip K. Dick has been the resource of stories for some very exciting films (Minority Report, Total Recall, Blade Runner), but in NEXT, his short story 'The Golden Man' as adapted by Gary Goldman and directed by Lee Tamahori, the concept of precognition as a human feature in altering the future falls into a video game format that becomes more action film and less human interest tale.

Cris Johnson AKA Frank Cadillac (Nicholas Cage) is a sloe eyed Las Vegas grungy magician who has found a way to hide the fact that he has the gift to see two minutes into his future, a gift that rewards him at the gambling tables but draws attention from the FBI after a thwarted attempt on Cris' part to stop a robbery is captured on video tape. The FBI, especially Agent Callie Ferris (Julianne Moore), knows that a nuclear device has entered the USA by terrorists headed by 'Mr. Smith' (Thomas Kretschmann), and that if the device cannot be traced, a nuclear bomb threatens the lives of millions of citizens. Agent Callie observes Cris' talent and engages him to aid in the discovery of the site of the device. But Chris' powers lead him to a beautiful young woman Liz (Jessica Biel) with whom his powers to see into the future can be extended for more than the requisite 2 minutes. After a series of 'attempts' at introduction, Cris and Liz bond, allowing Cris' expanded powers to be of more help to the persistent Agent Callie. From that point on the film dissolves into yet another combustible crashing action flick with endless CG special effects, all but erasing the character development. And the ending is as one might expect - not very Philip K. Dick in style.

Cage and Biel do well, Moore seems bored with her character, and Kretschman yet again embodies the evil of terrorism and beyond. There are some rather extraneous scenes on an Indian reservation that add little except the beauty of the Grand Canyon to the story, and there are some truly funny scenes of themes and variations on the chances we take in approaching a potential love source. But in the end all gets rather lost in the explosions ad infinitum that mark the film as a routine action flick. Grady Harp
67 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unexpectedly Good
andymcnish27 March 2009
I saw this movie on sale for a bargain £3.

I had never heard of it, but Nicholas Cage is usually watchable, Lee Tamahori did the brilliant Once Were Warriors and the 'look 2 minutes into the future' Macguffin sounded intriguing enough; so I bought it and put it in the DVD player after dinner for myself and the wife to watch.

It was really good and kept us both on the edge of our seats until the end (the ending was also very clever IMHO).

Actually the best movie (along maybe with Watchmen) that I've seen this year.

I imagine the pitch was something like 'Groundhog Day meets Die Hard', but for once they more or less pulled it off.

They could have had a love interest with less of an age gap (but I assume Jessica Biel is there for eye candy not acting reasons) and the plot is a bit silly at times, but Cage plays it with just the right amount of 'tongue in cheek' as a lead in a paranormal action romance and compared with the last movie I sat and watched with my wife (the third Mummy) which is in a similar genre I suppose, this is in a different class.

I can't really understand why so many folks give this really low ratings. Maybe it's real hard core action guys who dislike it, and it's probably not for them - but really this came as a very pleasant surprise. Highly recommended.
52 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sometimes you just get in too deep!
Hitchcoc31 August 2007
While I enjoyed the premise of this film, I felt like I so often do. You've got this neat idea; what are you going to do with it? Nicolas Cage plays a man who can see two minutes into the future, which allows him to move to different places to avoid danger, protect people in danger, and so on. The problem comes with the immutability of time. If you change things, what you saw really wasn't true; hence the plot hole. It was fun watching him dodge bullets and punches. What is hard to swallow is the mind that can put order to all this. Is this going on constantly or can he truly control it. If the mystery is out of his life, can he know the mystery. Part of my problem is that I never really understood what the bad guys were up to (I don't mean on a grander scale but on the details). Cage's relationship with Biel is nice but can he even have a relationship. The two minute thing was convenient. What if it had been a half hour or a day. How would that affect things. Anyway, when the ending comes, it seems satisfying but sad.

Someone said that people booed at the end. I'm sure it's because for some people, leaving a little too much to imagination is quite a stretch. It was a fun couple hours, but one shouldn't think too much. As for Philip K. Dick, he can provoke us pretty well.
70 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Keeps you watching to find out what happens "Next" ...
Vic_max7 June 2008
It was really interesting to watch this movie because it took the "ability to see the future" idea in a slightly new direction. The lead character can see the future, but only what happens to him and only 2 minutes into the future. Furthermore, he lives his life laying low so as to not get any attention.

Now that is a cool idea for a movie ... and it takes off from there when he finally does get noticed. Nicolas Cage does a great job of playing the lead role of a guy who just wants to be left alone. Julianne Moore is very effective as the bright and ruthless government agent pursuing Cage for the "greater good."

The movie is engaging (you always want to find out what happens next) and you get to see an interesting idea played out: how can he use his amazing yet limited ability given critical challenges?

If you're a sci-fan and like the idea behind this movie, definitely catch this. For everyone else, I'd say it's a definite thumb's up.
39 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Exciting Film
andy-197812 October 2008
I watched this film not knowing anything about it or heard of it. It came up on Foxtel. What a good film. I great when you come across a random film that has a good story line which is action packed with a top cast. Nic Cage plays an interesting role which would hold endless possibilities. A man who can see the future for the next two minutes. Imagine having that talent. He does the gambling thing which most people would take advantage of. He does the girl thing knowing if he will get rejected or not. And after all the normal sort of fun things, he gets called upon by the FBI to save the human race from the usual bomb threat. Lots of action and definitely worth a watch.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
2 minute forecaster
wbswetnam1 April 2012
"Next" is a film about Chris (played by Nicolas Cage), a man who can see what will happen to him personally up to two minutes into the future. The only exception to that rule is a vision he has of a beautiful woman (Jessica Biel) whom he knows he meets in a particular diner at 8:09. Every day, twice a day at exactly 8:09 he is in the diner until one day she arrives.

Because of Chris' forecasting skills, he goes to casinos on occasion to supplement his salary from his regular job as a magician. His skills are noticed by an agent of the FBI (Julianne Moore) who wants to utilize his abilities to thwart terrorists who plan to set off a nuclear device in Los Angeles.

I found the movie entertaining and suspenseful. There are a few sequences where the CGI looks kind of fake but overall I thought it was very good. It was well-acted and well-paced. I almost always like Nicolas Cage movies, and man oh man Jessica Biel looks absolutely smmmmmoking hot! I recommend it; I give it seven stars.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty good stuff
LazySod2 May 2007
Cris is a man with a gift. He can see into the future, at least into that bit of it that includes him. It's a gift he has only used for cheap tricks and the occasional gamble, until now. Because now there is a federal agent knocking at his door, telling him she needs him to predict when and where an act of terror is going to happen.

So far the background story. It is clear that it isn't the first time that this kind of story is worked out, there are many more films that play around just the same thing really. But this one is there, and plays around the same theme in its own way. IMO, it has all rights it needs to be considered a new film. The way the story is worked out really isn't half bad.

Somewhat predictable but nevertheless amusing. rolling on steadily like a rocky river. Effects are good enough, apart from a handful, characters are believable and tension is just (but barely) enough to keep it going.

7 out of 10 futures altered
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good. Not cheesy, Not overblown. Just pretty darn good.
Cris Johnson has the ability to see 2 minutes into his own future. He works a low-level magic act in Las Vegas with this secret ability and also makes money gambling. However, an FBI Agent sees his uncanny ability to foresee the immediate future and tries to get him to foil a terrorist plot.

The basic plot outline above isn't wholly exciting and can initially smell of outdated Cold War plot lines. And seeing that it is in the hands of Hollywood in the form of big budget action vehicle it will definitely turn many viewers off. The recent highly contrived sci-fi action movie "Deja Vu" is also another potential unfair strike against this movie. But, be clear of doubt, this film is actually good and it succeeds in being intriguing and not cheesy at the same time - completely unlike the "Deja Vu." "Next" leaves a lot to the audience's imagination and certain things are there just for you to accept on the basis that this is a movie - no lengthy pseudo-science speeches here. The movie also makes very good use of computer effects - there aren't many and the few that there are, aren't awful looking like director Lee Tamahori's last feature "XXX: The State of the Union." Johnson's clairvoyance is shown in a clever way and the story takes several nice turns. There is the stock Hollywood romantic angle here, but cheesiness is mercifully spared as it is not over done, but actually played out humorously in certain scenes.

Then the kicker is the ending, which I dare not give away, and it is a real breath of fresh air. It leaves you a lot to think about and that ultimately ends this film with, not a bang which many people might expect from a big-budget action-fest. No, definitely not a bang, but a hum. That hum will stay with you for a while after you finish watching as you think about what happened and what may still happen. --- 8/10

Rated PG-13 for violence
243 out of 393 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
unexpectedly funny
jemps91818 June 2007
Nicolas Cage is comfortable playing Las Vegas magician Cris Johnson in the fun action/sci-fi thriller Next. Cris has the uncanny ability to see two minutes into his future, which compels FBI Agent Ferris (played by a stony-faced Julianne Moore) to convince Cris to help stop a nuclear bomb from going off in LA. Sick of government experiments he was exposed to since childhood, Cris is reluctant, until he discovers that it will ultimately cost the life of Liz, the girl of his dreams (Jessica Biel).

Based on the Philip K. Dick story The Golden Man, Next is satisfactorily directed by Lee Tamahori (Die Another Day, Along Came a Spider). The movie is entertaining, especially since the dialogue remained light and didn't assume a serious philosophical route; plus, the action sequences are solid.

It was puzzling, though, to see Biel in a damsel-in-distress role that could've easily been played by any starlet. Her athletic assets take a backseat to her exotic beauty, which could not have been stressed enough by the lovestruck Cris. Those moments, fortified by the lack of believable chemistry between Cris and Liz, were almost always on the brink of comedy, which made the movie unexpectedly funny as well.
48 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Entertainginly pedestrian, could have been so much better.
BenjAii18 September 2007
Oh Hollywood, Hollywood, Hollywood, why can't you invest just a little of the millions of dollars you obviously put into special effects, paying for Nicolas Cage and the rest into a decent story ? Next has a brilliant premise, which is what drew me to it in the first place (and some misleadingly good reviews on here !) but it's such a let down. Entertaining enough if all your simple brain demands is yet another guy on the run with FBI, must stop bad guys, explosions and chases type film to add to the identikit hundred or so you've probably seen already. But you'd expect a little bit more than utterly pedestrian with Mr Cage and Miss Moore at the helm. It doesn't deliver.

Things start out well enough, but then they always do with these types of films. We're introduced to Cage's character and how the rules of his future seeing world operate through an entertaining spin through Las Vegas. Then things start to go wrong.

SPOILERS AHEAD

So my first gripe; the terrorists. They're French. What ? . I mean, great break out of film stereotypes and don't make all terrorists Muslims. But I expect some credibility and backstory for the ludicrous notion that French terrorists want to blow up LA with a nuclear bomb. We're never told and it's never explained. What a load of rubbish, why not make them Canadian or from Iceland, makes about as much sense. You've got to lose bucket loads of respect for a film and the imaginary world it's trying to create for two hours with a plot hole this stupid.

But it's symptomatic of the lazy storytelling that is such a letdown in this film. The 'rules' of Cage's future seeing universe are explained to us and then conveniently broken whenever a deux et machina plot moment requires it at will. But at this point it's all gotten a bit silly and I've given up caring. Except maybe to wonder why Julianne Moore thinks it's worth wasting her time with this sort of stuff. Can't she get any better work? Oh and the 'twist' at the end. For a moment I thought they we're actually going to do something clever. No, it just gets sillier as yet again they arbitrarily break with the rules they've created. No French terrorists waiting this time, though there should be.

Yes, it's entertaining enough, if that's all you want but disappointing in so many areas.

It makes you wonder if Hollywood is such a dog eat dog world where only the most talented survive how it can turn out so many dogs of films like this. An internet forum of movie buffs could have rewritten this into something so much better.
50 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It can be appreciated
NinevehProductions5 May 2007
NEXT is the type of film that has great potential to be highly entertaining, but it's also the kind of film that seems easy to hate. The key to watching NEXT is one must just let go of the critical, cynical attitude, and enjoy the film as if it were a piece of literature. In this respect, it's a very decent, unique film.

Too many people go to movies and then just point out every little flaw in the story or production and they can't even enjoy the art. Hundreds of people spent a lot of time, effort, and money just to entertain us, so the least we can do is be respectful.

NEXT is tempting to criticize, but just let yourself enjoy it.

Same thing happened with the first HULK movie... too many dumbass morons weren't intelligent enough to follow the concept, so now they have to make another one to appeal to dumb, testosterone-driven assholes... the same kinds of people who actually thought LXG was a good movie.
19 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Golden Man
rajdoctor28 April 2007
I had seen the trailer of this movie and I found the story to be old – a person who can see into the future, so my expectations from the movie was low. I like Nicolas Cage and that is why I went to see this movie.

The movie is about a magician Cris Johnson (Cage) who can see his own future for only 2 minutes ahead. The FBI Officer (Julianne Moore) is behind him to seek his help to uncover a nuclear weapon post in LA; the terrorist group is after him because they too want to be ahead of FBI with the help of Cage, but Cage does not want to help anyone and is on a run and his purpose is to seek a girl (Jessica Biel) whose future he can see for a longer period. The movie is about how Cage gets involved in helping FBI – only to realize in the end that he is able to save his girl friend instead of saving 8 million population of LA. The last scene of the movie (that I will not tell now and spoil the show) kept me unsatisfied with the movie.

Nicolas Cage has produced the movie himself. Lee Tamahori (Sopranos, Die Another Day, Along came a Spider fame) has directed the movie. The movie is based on a novel called "Golden Man".

Even though the story is old, the format of telling it, is new. From the first scene the director without wasting any time tells you that Cage can see his future and then takes you into unwinding of action, and never let go the pace of the movie. The movie has lots of twists and turns; mostly predictable – once we know that hero can see the future; but still maintains interest throughout.

Nicolas Cage looks a bit haggard but has acted well. Juliaane Moore and beautiful Jessica Biel have nothing extra-ordinary to do and their characters help the movie go forward. The movie has some good actions scenes and few funny moments. Funny moments because the Director allows the audience to see all the options Cage can think and see in future – and then chooses one that best suiting him.

I am having this feeling that Nicolas Cage is trying to re-invent himself in a much remembered screen character that can give him at least a few more innings as sequels. His choosing Ghost Rider and now this character of Next – both have tremendous scope for sequels like James Bond, Spiderman, Superman, Die Hard, etc. Sadly with box office not ticking the counters strongly – the hope of Cage does not seem to being materializing soon.

(Stars 6 out of 10)
26 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent rental for anyone
justcoolb28 September 2007
I believe this movie should get a lot of credit for doing something different. That is the plot was actually something different and actually made sense every scene. It didn't take 3 times to watch the movie to understand what happened. Nicholas Cage and Juliann Moore did a great job of this movie. I give kudos because Cage is one of my favorite actors. I think if a movie is going to have a special character or monster or something that does something special, that the movie should show an explanation of how or what exactly goes on and stick to it like any main plot to any one. Many movies like the Matrix turn people away because the movie gets too crazy with what is going on with the storyline,plot, or characters. This movie stuck to its guns and never changed what Cage's character could do, explained it well, and compiled everything together. The biggest drawback of why this movie is not but just a 7 from me is because the movie should have given your moneys worth and added at least 30 minutes to the ending to show you what would happen when he realizes what happened. Instead of the quick unnecessary ending that leaves you upset.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Some of the Most fun I've had in a Theater in a Long Time
airelosse27 April 2007
So what if that fun had nothing to do with the quality of the movie?

First off, everyone but Nicholas Cage was useless. Julianne Moore (Hannibal, The Hours) was pointless, but not quite as much as Jessica Beil (The Illusionist). Neither contributed much to the film, but at least Moore's character was trying to do something plotwise. Beil, well, she was there to look good. And she did, more or less. Besides that, she contributed nothing but a distraction to a movie who's "plot" was rough enough.

Oh yes, the plot. And i used the quotes for a reason. Apparently, there's a group of French-speaking, blond, Russian terrorists, none of whom you meet long enough to recognize or remember by name, planting a nuclear bomb (50 kiloton my ass.) in Los Angeles. And I'm not spoiling anything; the movie comes out and tells you this pretty early into it. So Moore, obsessed that Cage is the only one that can stop the bomb, somehow avoids being fired by her all too useless superiors and hunts him down. He's looking for Beil...only because he "saw" her once, important because it was more than the 2 minutes away he can normally see. Throw in some amateur philosophy talk about destiny, and we're half over.

The next half is Cage and Moore running...Cage with the same face in every situation, as per usual. Then, end.

A much more fitting end would've been: (Flashback to Cage in a casting agent's office): Cage - I'm sorry, but I've seen into this movie's future, and I see it failing miserably. Bye.

But it was fun...if, and only if, you go with a group of people who fully recognize this is not something to be taken seriously.

(sidenote: some of the best jokes are the "storytime with Fred Savage" ones when Peter Falk shows up early on)
43 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great mindbender
timhayes-129 April 2007
Next is one of those films that requires a second viewing. There's a lot going on and the plot doubles back on itself multiple times. Granted, there are some plot holes and some motivations are suspect, but overall it tends to entertain and keep you going more often than not.

Nicolas Cage plays Cris Johnson, a man who can see two minutes into the future and predict what will happen. The problem is that the future constantly shifts and every action will change the next future. The fact that he can only see up to 2 minutes ahead also limits him somewhat. It does however help greatly in his magic career as a Las Vegas showman. It also helps when playing small time gambling. Unfortunately, it has gotten the attention of the FBI who want Cris to help them stop a Russia nuclear bomb from being detonated on American soil.

As I said, there's a lot of backtracking in the story, which may serve to confuse some but is really important to the storyline. Cage turns in a great performance as the slightly eccentric seeming Cris. Julianne Moore is fine as a hard nosed FBI agent and Jessica Biel does all she can with a somewhat thankless role as the love interest.

Overall, I really enjoyed Next. It's a fun sci-fi film that is the perfect start of the summer season.
188 out of 314 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Oh Yeah, well I loved it before they even made it......
sirvertual30 September 2007
It's true...I've always been a fan of anything to do with time travel...even a couple of minutes in the future is enough to get me exited about a movie... This is 'Quality' too...And it's good to see Nicholas Cage back in quality roles with some substance...Admit it, the 'Gone in 60 Seconds, the recent 'Ghost Rider' these were simply vehicles that made him $$$$$$$$$$,$$$...(He had an 'Island to buy after all', soo PULEEEZE, give him a break!...Geesh!)...

Actually, as much as I liked this movie, it made me realize what a crappy life I have and how much of-a-difference a really good opportunity, or a-whole-Lotta'-Cash would/could make in my life...Actually, either one (either persona), the dude in the movie - Cris 'Frank Cadillac' Johnson (althoughthe 2-minute thing might be a lil' irritating), but 'my gosh' (CURSEWORD HERE), meeting someone like Jessica Biel (that fell in love with me?), with her striking good looks and (prolly) wide-range of talents and being able to actually win at the blackjack table!!!...Yeah, I got a pretty crappy life...Kidding, (but serious)...Or heck, Even Nicholas Cage (which would definitely be my 10th-20th choice), but still if you can just imagine growing up knowing the world is truly 'at your feet'...Meaning: You have enough gitas (gitas: green paper to 'git us this and git us that') to do whatever you want...'yeah, whatever' (including buying your own island!)...Oh well, I'm pretty depressed now...So cutting this one a bit short, even though I thoroughly enjoyed this movie and recommend it highly...GO RENT IT!...I'm gonna' go stand in traffic or something...I have a hard time even remembering two minutes in the past, much less seeing the future...I bet it's that thing that's going around, the STML-thing (Short Term Memory Loss)...

Bottom line (literally) This movie 'exudes quality'...and for me, that's what it really takes to make it a movie worth watching...Thanks...and again, My kindest Regards to you All!!!...

Sirvertual~
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie feeds on the souls of small kittens.
demicore26 April 2007
I just went to see it this morning and a huge pot of macadamia nut brittle vanilla ice cream wasn't enough to soften the bitterness (yes), I am thus compelled to write my first ever movie review in order to try and keep people from giving their hard-earned cash to whatever evil corporation struck this movie upon us.

This "movie" is about Chris Johnson, a guy who can see up to two minutes (except when the plot suddenly decides it's three hours) in the future. He uses this power in a cautious manner as to not attract too much attention on him and lead a peaceful life until he can finally meet True Love (tm), since he saw in a vision that a hot woman would one day enter his favorite restaurant at 8:09. So one day his dream finally comes true, although it turns out the girl in question is a gigantic prick. Not to worry though, Chris Johnson can see in the future WITH HIS MIND POWER and thus imagine every possible way to win the hot woman's heart, since everybody knows the sure-fire way to long term relationships is to hide your personality and put up an act. Sure enough when night comes up they end up in the same bed, and thus become lovers forever. Unfortunately this is the exact time European terrorists decide it's a good idea to bomb LA. At least I assume they are European, sadly there only was the dubbed version of the movie at my local theater but I think I heard one of them speaking German and another had his lips perfectly in sync with his voice, so he was probably French. Their motive is never explained. Thus begins a convoluted (by which I mean SHITTY) plot involving the two main characters making huge sacrifices for each other since they are True Loves and the bad guys being terribly retarded, accompanied by some of the worst CGI I've seen in the last few years along with horrible acting (although admittedly judgement is always clouded in dubbed movies). To top it all off, the ending is OBVIOUS.

Apart from Jessica Biel's beautiful body and the comic relief brought by Cage's haircut there is absolutely nothing remotely interesting in this movie, it simply is a gigantic waste of time and money. Tamahori made Mullholand Falls, Cage made, hell, he's acted great in tons of awesome movies, so I can only assume Next was intentionally made in order to crush the very minds of its viewers, then Tamahori can make a movie about it and get tonsa cash, there I discovered the whole plan. I will never sleep again until I get my 6 euros back.
70 out of 151 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Next
0U5 March 2020
A film where someone can see 2 minutes into the future was always going to be difficult to understand and in a way it was but it was different, Nothing like we thought it would be it had some good action scenes, As much as the ending annoyed me it fit into the film nicely, Nic Cage was good but I think someone like Tom Cruise would of played it better (No offence Nic) It does leave you trying to work things out in your head and they used his future gift to put in some shock tactics and it all worked, It's by no means a classic but it's as good as it was ever going to be, Even with some cheap effects in places.
19 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Back to the future ...
kenvandenbussche-210 October 2007
"Next" is a pretty simple movie made interesting only because of the frequent use of flash-backs and flash-forwards as a result of the unusual yet amazing talent of its main character Cris played by Nicolas Cage. Therefore: the movie does have a few surprises and, against all odds, the ending is quite nice too.

All characters in this movie as well as the acting performances are pretty lame but never truly bad. Which is why this movie is nothing more than a good popcorn flick.

Jessica Biel is beautiful as always, but unfortunately she provides little else. Nicolas Cage is good too although his character could've easily been a member of the X-men.

In short: a lifeless movie which becomes, oddly enough, exciting because of its clever shifting between past, present and future.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The quickest hour-and-a-half ever!
rawiri421 October 2014
Next is different! Whether it is true Sci/Fi is, in my opinion, debatable. Oh yes, it IS paranormal. No doubt about that - and you find that out in the opening scene. Cris Johnson (Nicholas Cage) is a Las Vegas magician with a difference. He has a gift where he can see briefly into his future which, as any opportunist would do, he uses to his financial advantage, not only in his stage act but also at the gambling tables. But Cris is also sensible. Whilst he could use his gift to make millions - very briefly - he just makes enough to do what he wants to do in life without drawing attention to himself as he would if he consistently relieved the house of large sums of money.

Following an unfortunate incident at the casino where Cris is mistaken for a petty robber and, on viewing the CCTV coverage of the incident, FBI agent Callie Ferris realises his gift and tries to recruit him to help in stopping an international terrorist gang that is threatening to explode a stolen Soviet nuclear bomb in Los Angeles, putting 8 million people's lives at stake.

Ferris (Julianne Moore) thinks (somewhat mistakenly) that Cris can help find out where and when the terrorists are going to act before it happens but, knowing his own limits, Cris wants nothing of it until circumstances leave him with no alternative.

And then the movie ends!

P.S. It's what happens to change Cris' mind that makes this a movie well worth watching! And that's what makes it a refreshingly different and surprising story.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Next!
helmutty14 July 2007
Before I go to the NEXT movie, I want to say I am impressed with this science-fiction movie. The story is a hell simple but you don't know whether Cris Johnson (Nicolas Cage) is seeing in his vision or in the real world. Some scenes surprised me. When you watch it, you should know. The plot is dead simple, you get Cris Johnson, a magician, performing cheap tricks in somewhere of Las Vegas but when a group of terrorist threatens to detonate a nuclear device in Los Angeles, Callie Ferris (Julianne Moore), government agent, must capture him in order to convince him to help them stop the nuclear bombing. And Cris keeps escaping from them and you get a mindless blowing action movie. It is fun to see what Cris has up to his sleeves.

Jessica Biel did a good job to in her character. In all, it seems to be a short flick, I did not realise that time was passing so fast. By the time Cris got caught, it is already going to finish and when by the time it ends, you don't know. If you like movies like this, then go ahead to watch it. But, hell yeah, the ending is a bit out of we expected. It does have the action if there is a need to. You may like or not like the ending but it did a good job making people surprised. Watch it if you like movies with no ending. Worth watching it on DVD.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed