Mean Creek (2004) Poster

(2004)

User Reviews

Review this title
179 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Intelligent, superbly acted and thoroughly absorbing
anhedonia29 September 2004
I knew next to nothing about this film when I went to see it. I knew it starred Rory Culkin, who was so good in 2000's best film, "You Can Count on Me," and received some critical acclaim. But I knew nothing about the story and what a wonderful surprise "Mean Creek" proved to be.

This is an intelligent, engaging movie buoyed by some of the best acting by young actors this year. Writer-director Jacob Aaron Estes, who won a 1998 Nicholl Fellowship in Screen writing for his script, takes the basic premise of revenge against a school bully and turns it into a moving and gripping film. Incidentally, this is the second terrific movie to come out of that Nicholl class - the other was Karen Moncrieff's "Blue Car," one of last year's best films.

Given the subject matter, "Mean Creek" could easily have been another after-school special masquerading as an indie feature. But Estes eschews the conventions of the genre to give his characters unexpected depth and create an engrossing morality play. None of his characters is a caricature; they're all flawed and unmistakably human. The moral issues they face are real and complex; the crises they create are dealt with expertly.

What's special about "Mean Creek" are its fine young actors. Culkin again is convincing as a skittish young boy being picked on by the school bully, but the two startlingly brilliant performances are by Josh Peck as the bully George, and Carly Schroeder as Millie, the young girl unexpectedly dragged into the plot.

Peck makes George captivating when he could just as easily made him a typical, one-note bully. Peck gives George substance and turns on the charm so well that we understand the others' reluctance to go through with exacting his comeuppance. George becomes likable, someone who seems to resort to bullying to hide inadequacies of his own. Peck draws us into his character; we feel sympathy for someone who is supposed to be unsympathetic.

The flaw in Estes' writing is that after making George someone who elicits compassion, Estes unwisely opts for an easy way out by forcing George to turn to his uglier side. Had George suddenly not turned mean, the moment would have been far more potent than it already is.

Young Schroeder is downright extraordinary. Her Millie is mature way beyond her years. She serves as the group's moral core and Schroeder's scenes in the immediate aftermath of a tragedy are so astonishingly raw, you're likely to forget she's a young teen actress. Hers is one of the best supporting performances the year.

"Mean Creek" is one of the best coming-of-age films. All teenagers and their parents should see this, despite its R rating. It's unfortunate the MPAA gave "Mean Creek" an R rating because despite the use of the F-word, "Mean Creek" is far less offensive than much of the PG-13-rated garbage - the more recent "Charlie's Angels" movies, for instance - and provides more enjoyment and insight into human behavior in five minutes than almost any mainstream movie playing right now.
124 out of 147 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
'Deliverance' For The Truth Or Dare Crowd
flickershows1 September 2004
'Mean Creek' is 'Deliverance' for the Truth Or Dare crowd. John Boorman's 1972 thriller about a canoe trip gone wrong had a sense of reality and inevitability that redeemed the horrific violence. The film didn't flinch and no one escaped with a happy ending. Feature-film newcomer Jacob Aaron Estes' prank-gone-too-far morality tale isn't as riveting as 'Deliverance', but his 'Mean Creek' hits many of the same haunting notes. He skillfully uses guilt and paranoia as weapons. Just ask Nixon...it's not the crime, it's the cover-up.

The only cast member I've heard of is Rory Culkin, who reinforces the notion that he's the best actor in his family. Sam (Culkin) and 4 others (his potential girlfriend, his big brother, and 2 friends) have conned the local bully into joining them on a boating trip. They're planning to trick him into stripping off his clothes, then they'll make him run home naked. The girl (Carly Schroeder) doesn't discover this plan until she's already in the boat, but she convinces the boys to call it off. After all, George the bully (Josh Peck) is just a fat fool who might even be a nice guy.

Ah, but a good film never lets its characters off the hook that easily. Our Greek tragedies dictate that there would be no film (certainly not one called 'Mean Creek') if they all just lived happily yadda yadda. George doesn't deserve this treatment, but he's not perfectly innocent either. Actually, he's askin' for it. What eventually happens to him might not be deliberate, but how will the kids explain their actions? It doesn't help that George has been recording most of the trip on a video camera.

The skilled child actors are allowed to play smart characters. They give naturalistic performances and say real things. Estes' perceptive script doesn't let ANYONE off the hook because there's a lot of blame to go around. George isn't the only bully, after all. 'Mean Creek' is a fairly simple story told with a series of complex layers. Humiliation, vengeance, a waking nightmare, no heroes or villains...the film is filled with themes. In the final thirty minutes, the characters are forced to deal with the consequences of their actions. For such a child-filled movie, this is a grown-up story.
59 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This Is A Good Movie That I Hate
Foutainoflife19 July 2018
Let me start with the fact that I love this. This is a realistic look at the frameworking of bullying and its consequences. No one wants to be bullied. I think it is safe to say that most victims of bullying fantasize about revenge even if most never seek it out. I also think that the premise of taking out a pack revenge is realistic as well as the idea of backing out of it is. I think most kids realise that the bully is the one who has the real problem and in the end revenge is not as rewarding as it might seem to be.

I'm not sure if what I am about to talk about would be considered spoilers so this is just a heads up warning in case those reading are seeking to avoid any kind of potential spoiling.

The scenario that unfolds here clearly ends up being an accident. Watching the kids try and come to terms with it is the gem of this movie because even if their initial actions were wrong, they end up doing the right thing. That makes this a beautiful glimpse of the maturing mind and a wonderful movie to watch.

Where this fails for me is that there is no resolution. It would've been nice to have seen how their choice to do the right thing was handled. I would've like to known if they were reprimanded in some way and how their friendships were affected. I also really felt bummed out by the fact that the ringleader of this group was clearly shown to be going off the rails at the end but what was his overall outcome. This had been so captivating yet it just stopped leaving me with the desire to know more about what happened and hating that I'd never really get answers. That causes what was shaping up to be a high rating to lose a few stars from me.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
tight well made flick
samzpan5 September 2004
You're not going to leave the theater whistling dixie, and a box of Kleenex is not the best accessory, but this tight well made little movie is worth the effort. The actors, mostly all kids, are very believable, everyone of them does a great job, and maybe the credit should go to the director. As the movie bounces along you kind of expect that something is going to go wrong. And, of course, it eventually does, and after the big scene, it's like downer city, for everyone including the audience. But so what, if you want to go see a happy flick there are plenty of those around. This movie depicts kids in a very realistic light. The dialogue, their emotions, their reactions to a crisis, are very spot on. Good movies like this blow away so called "reality" TV. A friend with me said this reminded him of a Gus Van Sant movie, I don't agree with that, Van Sant movies always have some really weird scenes in them that detract from the overall cohesion of the movie. Mean Creek doesn't do that, check it out.
72 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Raw, realistic coming-of-age drama
Leofwine_draca5 January 2013
MEAN CREEK reminds me a lot of Stephen King's STAND BY ME and William Golding's LORD OF THE FLIES, looking at the issue of childhood bullying and exploring what happens when the tables are turned on a bully by one of his victims.

It's a haunting, evocative, beautifully shot little movie, one of those low budget indie efforts that eschews special effects and melodrama in favour of solid characterisation and tight, focused scripting. You get caught up in the lives of the characters right from the outset and the film keeps you glued to the screen until the last moments.

The young cast members are excellent, bringing to life the grittiness and authenticity of the storyline. As the bully, Josh Peck is particularly engaging, remaining an irritating and unpleasant character throughout but somehow eliciting sympathy from the audience at the same time. All in all, this is a tough, uncompromising little movie that proves a refreshing alternative to the latest Hollywood blockbuster.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazingly accurate depiction of American adolescence
pachl9 February 2008
I had one of the biggest shocks of my life recently. I proudly showed this film to my best friend from Europe. We normally have very similar tastes in movies.

I have to admit, I almost teared up a little around the end of the movie, but managed to keep my composure. Then the movie ended... to dead silence! I was waiting for my friend to say something, and what he said shocked me: "What the hell was THAT?" After discussing the movie a bit, I came to the conclusion that his experiences growing up were so different than this that it was like showing a futuristic Sci Fi movie to a person living in rural Zimbabwe. In the Czech Republic, where he is from, you don't commonly have these kinds of problems. Kids get along amazingly well. You may find this hard to believe, but in the Czech Republic, grade school and high school teachers routinely take their classes to places all around Europe. They have no trouble with kids not getting along. No one has any whiny special requests, and no one refuses to share a room with someone.

Guess that explains why this movie made no sense to my friend.

However, if you are an American, as I am, this movie is deeply touching, and may even bring back unsettling childhood memories of bullies.

Scott Mechlowicz is certifiably great in this movie, as is Josh Peck, who plays George, the bully. I look back at movies from the 1970's. Child actors back then were hilariously amateurish compared to these people. In fact, movies increasingly are showcasing young actors whose talents are absolutely astounding. (unlike the kid who played opposite Lucille Ball as "Auntie Mame's grandson).

What makes this movie so compelling and memorable is that it is tragedy in the old Greek sense of the word: people bring about their own downfall. The bully George, as it turns out, has a good side, but he is socially inept, and so he lashes out in terrible ways. The kids are ready to like him and forgive him. Instead, George can't control his anger, and he verbally lashes out at everyone, until their newfound compassion (or at least pity) for him starts to evaporate.

The tragedy in this movie is that everything comes so close to working out fine for everyone.

I hope that will peak your interest. And speaking of interest, I have none in writing a "spoiler" review. This movie is best seen knowing as little as possible about the plot.

I think if I had to defend American movie making against all the criticism of how Hollywood depends on special effects, big name actors, and lurid story lines, I would choose this movie as proof that American movies are still the best in the world.

Addition added January 16, 2009: I have been writing reviews here for over three years. Sometimes years will go by without any indication someone read my review. So, please let me know if you read it. The thumbs up or thumbs down is entirely your choice. I'm just curious.
110 out of 120 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mean Creek (2004, Estes) ***
noirfan68812 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Mean Creek (2004, Estes) *** (of *****)

(Review has a few spoilers, but none ruin any important plot points)

The feature-length directorial debut of Jacob Aaron Estes (He made a short film in 2001) is an interesting, but flawed film. Estes does a good job of doing away with the usual clichés and stereotypes in these kind of films -- for instance, one of the characters has homosexual parents, but they aren't portrayed in a feminine way, they are actually the most caring and responsible in the whole film. The other parents in the film are either dead or irresponsible. The director could have easily made them be the prototypical gay couple like you'd see in many other movies. The film also tackles death, bullying, and adolescence very well. The photography is stunning, it is filmed on DV, with cinematography by Sharon Meir. The music in the film is great, too -- Mos Def, Wilco, The Eels. However, with all the good things the film has going for it, it also suffers from a number of faults. Most noticeably, the pacing. At 87 minutes, you'd expect the film the move really quickly and be tightly paced, but it isn't. At times, there are long stretches of nothing, just the kids sitting or staring into space. You could remove at least 15 minutes off of the film and not loose anything. Another problem with the film is the character development -- characters are built-up and then they do something which makes you question why you even cared for the character in the first place. Although the end of the film offers some closure, I had already stopped caring about the fate of the characters and where they would be headed. The best performances in the film are by Josh Peck and Scott Mechlowicz. Both were really complex, believable performances. Mean Creek is a good, ambitious indie film, but nothing more. I would recommend renting it, it's definitely worth watching, but by the time the film ending, I was left unsatisfied. There is something missing in the film, I just wish I could pinpoint exactly what it is.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Disturbing yet beautiful portrait of adolescence
hockeyfreak10116 August 2005
To start off this review I must say, that when I first discovered the corny box cover I thought it had to be a comedy. When I read the back I figured it must be one of those dark comedy films. And with a cast like that, how could it not be??? I have never been so wrong in my whole life.

I have seen many movies before, and none have held such great performances as this, and hardly any have spoken to the audience in such a powerful way. This film is quite disturbing, mainly because of its brutal honesty. The characters are deeply flawed yet still ring true to real life. Out of the main characters, you can at least relate to one, if not all.

The actors....wow. I can't believe that Josh Peck gave such an amazing performance as George, the bully or basically any of the cast members. I would have NEVER known that he was the boy from The Amanda Show. In fact the only actor I expected to pull this off was Rory Culkin. The performances were so natural, so beautiful I almost forgot I was watching a film.

Sure, many people hated this movie. That's their choice and no matter which film you see, there's bound to be haters. Yet, I think that the people who hated it just haven't looked deep enough into it, into the dark underlying.

Mean Creek is a very unique and individual film. You can't even really put it into a category. The atmosphere, emotion and message this film brings across to the audience is so real and gives you the final slap across the face at the end of the film. It really hits you. I think that some people who hated this movie are just scared of it. I think they're scared of just how much reality there is in it and the heartbreaking proof behind it.

The dialogue is also pretty damn real. Jacob Aaron Estes really captures the essence of what its like to be a male adolescent...the dialogue feels like its coming straight from the heart.

This movie portrays the state of mind of a teenager beautifully. Definitely 10/10.
57 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beautifully acted adolescent drama capsized by predictability
fertilecelluloid24 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
For the first fifty minutes, this is one taut, unpredictable, naturalistic look at adolescence...and a fine suspense thriller. But once the film's major event occurs, the care factor gradually drops to zero.

A combination of "Stand By Me" and "Deliverance" with teens and pre-teens, it is a well acted and skilfully directed. Two performances in particular -- Carly Schroeder as Millie and Josh Peck as George -- are standouts. Young Rory Culkin is also very believable as a boy bullied by his enemies and friends.

The film's first fifty minutes are great because they leave us unsure about where we stand with the central character. George, an overweight, angry teenager with behavioral problems, is targeted for humiliation after he beats up Rory Culkin. The boy's friends, led by the intimidating Clyde (Ryan Kelley), take a short canoing trip on the local river and invite George, who is oblivious to their plan, along for the ride. But tensions between the kids explode and George becomes a different kind of problem to them.

The film is handsomely shot and nicely scored. It is unfortunate that utter predictability and inevitability capsizes its potential greatness, but it's well worth catching, anyway, for its solid performances.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Simple, Real, Powerful and Impressive
claudio_carvalho4 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
In Oregon, when the bully George Tooney (Josh Peck) beats his schoolmate Sam Merric (Rory Culkin), his older brother Rocky (Trevor Morhan) schemes a prank with his two also teenager friends Clyde (Ryan Kelley) and Marty (Scott Mechlowicz) seeking revenge. They invite George, Sam and his girlfriend Millie (Carly Schroeder) to a boat trip along the river, with the intention of humiliating George and get even. However, Millie convinces Sam to call off the plan and the boys accept in spite of the reluctant Marty. When they decide to play "truth or dare" in the middle of the river, the truth about the prank is disclosed to George and he offends the boys mostly the traumatized Marty, leading the group to an accident with tragic consequences.

"Mean Creek" is a simple, real, powerful and impressive story. The first point that calls the attention is the performances of this young generation of promising and talented actors and actress. I hope they have the same luck of Coppola's boys of "Rumble Fish" and "The Outsiders". The story teaches in a hard way that for each action that we take there are consequences. Further, this is the first honest film that exposes the problematic relationship of an adolescent with gay parents with his friends. "Mean Creek" is certainly one of the best coming-to-age movies that I have ever seen and therefore highly recommended inclusive for teenagers. The Brazilian title is simply awful. My vote is nine.

Title (Brazil): "Pacto Maldito" ("Damned Pact")
45 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The same old, same old. (spoilers)
vertigo_1419 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
We've seen this story a million times, exploring the psyche and somewhat animal nature of teenagers left to their vices. Though, this one may be done in the most simplistic form. Rory Culkin plays Sam, a kid who often finds himself at the hands of George (Josh Peck), the schoolyard bully. Sam's brother (Trevor Morgan) and his friends, all older than both Sam and George, plot harmless revenge upon George, inviting him on a boating trip with the friends, Sam, and Sam's girlfriend, Millie. At first, a few befriend George, but after tensions heat up by one too many off-colored remarks from George, the oldest of the friends, Marty (Scott Mechlowicz) decides to go forward and give George his humiliating just desserts. Only, things don't pan out according to plan, and instead, end up much worse than the friends had in mind. It becomes a careless prank gone very very wrong. We have seen and heard this story many times before. You can probably guess how things will turn out from beginning to end (except the very end as it involves everyone but Marty). The nature of the teenagers, the struggle between characters is all there in by-the-book form.

Left with the routine story, the two most remarkable features of this film instead are the acting and the scenery. Major applause for Josh Peck, who plays George, particularly at his most violent moments. And, though filmed in trademark indie film blue tinting, the Oregon scenery is amazing, especially if you're not from that area. Other than that, I imagine the most appeal for this movie comes the recognition of its young cast (particularly Rory Culkin and that fine fella, Trevor Morgan).
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wow
MeanCreekfan12 March 2005
This movie completely took me by surprise. I saw it mostly because I love independent films and have been a fan of Carly Schroeder and Rory Culkin for awhile now, and make it a point to see whatever either of them are in. But wow, was I shocked. I have never seen that kind of depth (acting wise) from kids like this. Every actor was brilliant and unique in there performances. The characters were realistic and relate able, the writing and directing (by first timer Jacob Aaron Estes) are immaculate, and the story is completely believable and leaves you thinking about it after you leave the theater. I can't even pick a stand out performance, because unlike most films today, all of the six leads were stand outs. This movie is unlike no other you'll see, and it will affect you in ways that will stay with you. I'd recommend this movie to anyone. 9/10.
50 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Too little too late.
=G=11 February 2005
"Mean Creek" is a film about high school aged kids who conspire to get even with a school bully with a prank which goes seriously wrong. The story is so simple that the end is almost a foregone conclusion reducing it to just so much of the obvious elements required to develop the meager plot and see it through to its conclusion. "Mean Creek" fared well with critics and public alike scoring a marginal two thumbs up and is very well executed considering its one man indieness. However, it lacks the intensity and edge of similar much better films such as "Bully (2001)" and "Elephant (2003)" and spends most of its time just showing kids behaving like kids. This film is just one of a long list of films about teens with nothing very special to offer. (B-)
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not bad, but the basic premise is hard to believe
paulo2018 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is reminiscent of the film Bully (2001), in which a group of kids are bullied by another kid, so they plot his death. Here, they don't plot the kid's death, but he ends up dead anyway. The other difference is, the bully in the film Bully seemed to deserve it, while the kid in this film didn't even seem to deserve the original intent, which was a prank to humiliate him (i.e. make him strip to his birthday suit, throw him in the creek and have him walk a considerable distance home that way).

Anyway, the film opens with the alleged bully (Josh Peck, from "Drake and Josh") adjusting his video camera so that he can film himself shooting hoops. Not long after, Rory Culkin enters the frame and messes with his camera. This prompts Peck to shout out in indignation and to beat up Rory Culkin, telling him that he warned him not to touch his camera. Now, I don't know about anyone else, but it seems if some aggressive fat kid who outweighs you by about 100 pounds, tells you not to touch his property or "he'll kill you", you listen. Unfortunately, this warning didn't take, and Rory Culkin ends up with a bruise on the side of his face.

My point here is that, while it may not be cool to get beat up for touching someone's camera, if the person was actually warned you not to do so and you do so anyway, I don't know if I'm inclined to feel any sympathy. Also, we're expected to believe that Little Kid is a frequent victim of the fat kid's attacks, but all we see is the incident of Culkin messing with Fat Kid's camera so we can only imagine instances where Fat Kid picks on Little Kid because he feels like it. At any rate, if someone beats on you a lot, wouldn't you stay as far away from that person as possible, as opposed to touching their stuff?

Anyway, seems that Rory Culkin has a big brother, not Macaulay or Kieran or any other Culkin in this case, but Trevor Morgan (the sarcastic, arrogant kid from The Sixth Sense) who seems like he and his friend, Tough Kid (Scott Mechlowicz) and Sensitive Kid (Ryan Kelley) can beat up Fat Kid (or at least tell him to back off). But high-falutin' Culkin has other ideas, saying that "if we hurt him, we're no better than he is. First off, seriously, do kids really talk like this? Second, like it's much better to make Fat Kid walk a long way home wet and naked? Anyway, most of the group have second thoughts and decide not to go through with it, except Tough Kid, who gets ticked off by Fat Kid initiates a Truth or Dare game and dares him to strip naked and jump in the water. However, the truth comes out that that was the intent all along, whereupon Fat Kid gets ticked and starts insulting the heck out of everyone, notably Tough Kid, whom he mocks about the suicide of his father, very loudly and obnoxiously. This ends up with Big Brother pushing Fat Kid into the drink. He screams frantically for help, but the other kids just stare at him for a while from the boat. Suddenly he bangs his head on an unseen rock, bleeds and goes unconscious. This breaks Big Brother out of his stupor and he belatedly jumps in to rescue him. But he and his friends are too late and so passes Fat Kid.

So, anyway, what's the idea there? Why would the others just let Fat Kid scream and flail around like that for a good minute before they do anything about it? That secretly they all want him dead, so they subconsciously decided to do nothing? Or are they just dumb? I'm going for the latter option, because this whole premise seems dumb. Not that the prank is realistic but most of these kids don't seem like the kind of people who'd go for that sort of thing. Indeed, most of them back out and say stupid things like "we did it because you were mean but then we liked you." Anyway, in the second half or so, the group decides to bury the body and make pretend it never happened. However, everyone, except Tough Kid, decides they can't carry that around with them for the rest of their lives and so decide to come clean. This part actually makes for compelling viewing. Unfortunately, the setup is rather weak, so the film isn't exactly what it could be.
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Makes "Thirteen" look bad
jsemovieman12 November 2004
Mean Creek ***1/2/out of 4

"Mean Creek" has the most accurate depiction of teen life and adolescence I've ever seen in a movie. Unlike "Thirteen", which is stereotypical and tries to give answers and resolutions, "Mean Creek" sticks out in the teen-life genre as a beauty. The young actors and actresses do a great job, but Carly Schroeder as Millie is the best. She gets to your gut as the innocent kid who's in the wrong place at the wrong time.

One of the most memorable parts for me in the movie is when the Bully, George, is filming with his camcorder and zooms in on an exotic spiral shape, saying "This is my life". That's such a brilliant line because adolescence is such a horrible and awkward stage in life. High schoolers (being one myself) are filled with an assortment of emotions and feelings and "Mean Creek" portrays that with such power.

Like "Deliverance", the film is focused on a canoe trip that goes completely wrong and "Mean Creek " has some themes that "Deliverance" has. Jacob Aaron Estes is a director who is off to a great start-making films that are completely honest in every way.
107 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Film, But Never Quite Reaching the Level of Great
gavin69423 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
When a teen (Rory Culkin) is bullied, his brother and friends lure the bully into the woods to seek vengeance.

While this film is highly predictable, that does nothing to take away from it. The simple plot of revenge gone wrong is not judged by the plot itself but by its execution. And the execution here is rather well done. Not perfect, mind you, but quite good just the same.

George (Josh Peck) is a difficult character. While it is hard to love him, there is definitely an emotional divide: do we dislike him or feel sorry for him? Can we do both simultaneously? The film tests the audience as much as it tries to expose the world of bullies.

There are a few questionable plot switches later on in the film, but nothing completely unbelievable. More surprising is how much the film focuses on building up to the key moment rather than dealing with it after the fact. The third act is short, leaving many questions in its wake.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The good outweighs the bad in this outstanding picture!
Martina_Helene14 July 2005
Mean Creek is an amazing movie. It is so refreshing to see a good movie when there are so many worthless ones around presently. There are many great things about Mean Creek, and a few not so good things. The writing is excellent, the directing is great. The acting is so well done, it seems more real than half the "reality" TV shows on TV today. The young actors which consist of Trevor Morgan, Ryan Kelley, Scott Melchowitz, Rory Culkin, Carley Shroader, and Josh Peck. I was blown away by their performances. There is another thing that makes Mean Creek so unique. It's cinematography (sp?). Most of the action of the movie takes place within one day, and at a Creek. The filming of the Creek is so magnificent, there are great shots of the Creek itself, the water, the forestry around it, and there are some great pictures of the animals that call the creek home. The subject matter of Mean Creek is extreme and dramatic, which is another reason for the amazement at the young actors in this film! The main subject revolves around the themes of forgiveness and revenge. The first five children plan a simple revenge trick on the bully, yet something horrible happens are all of the children are forced into an extremely difficult situiton in just a matter of minutes. The ending is a bit ambiguous, and open ended. WHich, I think is good in a certain way but I would have wanted more closure about the fate of the children. I am surprised by the lack of representation at the award shows for this picture. I truly believe this film in underrated and under viewed, because it's an indie and it's a directors debut.
42 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
nice dark coming-of-age
SnoopyStyle18 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
George Tooney (Josh Peck) is a foul-mouthed big kid obsessed with his video camera. Sam Merrick (Rory Culkin) gets into a fight with him and gets beaten up. Sam tells his older brother Rocky who starts planning revenge with his friends Clyde and Marty Blank. They lure George on a fake birthday trip for Sam. Millie (Carly Schroeder) finds George loud but not necessarily mean-spirited. She convinces Sam to change his mind. Despite the change, a conflict escalates on the trip going down the creek.

This is River's Edge with younger kids. That is very compelling. The kids are solid actors. They feel real. After the incident, they need time living with the secret. It would be nice to have more conflict time as the cops search for missing George. The second half is set up for more drama.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My tenth favorite film of all time
sjtuplin5 April 2007
A kid. A bully. A brother. A brothers friends. A girl/friend. A plan. A life changing event. I Watched the trailer for this film for 2 years. I still remember the afternoon when I viewed this powerful film about a teen just trying to look after his brother. A film about the consequences of our actions. By the end it was hard to move and even harder to forget. The cast had some of the best chemistry I have ever seen. SPOILER WARNING: The most powerful scene is after George dies and all sit quietly. No music. No talking. Just silence, shaking, and blank stares. Then as the score begins the yelling and arguing does as well. They dig a grave and go home. In the end the dead teenager speaks his view of life on the videotape that was retrieved. His simple words get the last lines of the film.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The actors make this a very good film about how fragile childhood can be.
dermottferry12 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This is a relatively short film at just over 80 minutes long. But when it is done, you feel like you have followed the people in the movie for a far longer period of time. It is an absorbing, tension filled, emotional roller-coaster ride, and the whole cast are great.

George is the school bully. This seems like a cliché for a film that focuses on youngsters. But we soon learn that he is a kid with a lot of problems. After he beats up Sam, the time for George to be put in his place arrives. So Sam, along with brother Rocky, Clyde, and Marty, hatch a plan that will see George forced to jump in the river during a boat trip and have to run home naked. Another member of the group, Millie, played by the excellent Carly Schroeder, is reluctant to go along with the plan.

As the boating trip progresses, the group eventually see that George isn't the bully he appears to be. So the whole joke is called off, and we see them continue with the trip by doing what youngsters should do everyday of their lives, having fun and enjoying themselves.

But in an instant everything changes. A moment of madness effectively ends a childhood and the groups lives are changed forever.

I think everyone should watch this film, they will go away with something to think about. And the film will stay with you for a long time.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Once the climax unfolds, it doesn't turn back
burnzyburns17 October 2020
What starts off as an innocent little movie becomes much more, it takes a bold path that's ravelling to the audience.

Mean Creek is dark, real, and accurate. It's a risk taker and I'm sure it hasn't sat well with many people, but it's portrayed so well that it becomes gripping and you can't stop watching.

Our young cast is fantastic. Josh Peck really surprised me as a boy who has some serious mental health problems, I didn't think he could handle such a role but he nearly perfects it. Scott Mechlowicz who plays Marty could have arguably stole the show here. Marty is so cold and sinister, that it's not entirely his fault, but makes two mistakes that will change his life forever. I won't spoil it of course. Finally it's worth mentioning Rory Culkin, our protagonist, is strangely likeable but shows cracks, even if he didn't have a choice in the process.

Mean Creek's build up is real, and once the climax hits, we don't turn back. We get a real downward spiral into madness and regret. If you're looking for a true horror film, start here.

An easy 10 for me.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stand By Me with a twist
Robert_duder7 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Mean Creek is one of several indie films I have seen in the last few weeks and it's one of the better ones that stands out. Mostly it stands out because of it's impressive performances by it's young cast that makes up more than 95% of the film. It's also not an incredibly drawn out film but sticks to the plot and never gets too odd or complicated.

The film revolves around a typical school yard bully. He's self conscious and makes himself a big man by picking on the smaller kids. One day he puts a beating on young Sam for messing with his video camera. Sam's older brother Rocky, along with his best friend Marty, come up with a prank that hopefully will humiliate Bully George. They convince George that they want him to tag along on a birthday outing for Sam. But they plan on stripping George naked, dunking him in the river, and leaving him to walk home. Sam comes along, and brings his girlfriend Millie as well, although Millie doesn't know of their plans. George, at first, comes across as nicer than they expected and it makes Sam, Millie, and Rocky change their minds about it. Marty doesn't like this idea because he came all the way out here to humiliate this kid. Marty is constantly bullied by his older brother and seems to want to take out his aggressions on this kid. George eventually starts to let his mean streak out and makes Marty furious and George accidentally goes overboard in the boat, hits his head and drowns. Despite their attempts to save him, he dies on the shore. They are all awe struck and Marty being the eldest and more of a leader type insists they bury the body and tell no one. This doesn't sit well with them but they do it, however when they get back to reality, they all have second thoughts.

The characters in the film are diverse and interesting. We don't get a huge look into their background and yet director and writer Jacob Estes manages to show us each one and a little of their home life and the troubles they have and show us each one's diverse personality. The cast takes this direction and gives us amazing characters and performances. Rory Culkin is very good as the young victim Sam who seems unwillingly pushed into all this. Scott Mechlowicz also stands out as the leader Marty. He's obviously a disturbed young man who is fighting to stay away from bad influences and not fall into a life of crime but ends up there anyways. He so desperately wants friends who love and support him. Josh Peck who plays bully George is exactly as obnoxious and mean as he needs to be. The film to me resembled Stand By Me, the characters all closely intertwined and all of them behaving in an adult fashion without any of the maturity. I am not a HUGE fan of Indie films but as far as they go this is definitely one of the better ones. It's worth checking out to see some great performances by some young actors. Clocking in at less than 1 1/2 hours gives it an edge in my opinion because it's not wordy or preachy or annoyingly long. Its pure simplicity is what it's all about and it works. 7.5/10
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellently acted, emotionally genuine, and subtly intelligent.
carlphillips120 April 2005
Mean Creek, in my opinion, was an excellent film. Though the actual plot of the movie is somewhat unoriginal, Jacob Aaron Estes does a fine job directing it, and steering it away from any clichés. The acting was also exceptional, and the actors captured all the strong emotions caused by a death and regret, but in a subtle way.

The story slowly reveals the characters' true selves as they travel along a river, planning to pull a prank on George (Josh Peck), a local bully who has dangerous mood swings, and beat up Sam (Rory Culkin). Sam's girlfriend, his brother, and his brother friends take George on a trip, making him believe that they want to be friends with him. During the trip, George acts unusually nice, and the rest of them start having second thoughts, except for Marty (Scott Mechlowitz), who has no reason to discontinue the prank. Unfortunately, George had a strong mood swing, and nothing good came of it...

... that is, except for an originally captivating emotional ride, which sits heavy on the concepts of unimaginable regret and questioning whether the truth should be revealed. The last scene, in which George explains how his mind works, makes you look back on the movie and think, "Wow."
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fine drama/thriller with excellent acting
tankjonah5 May 2006
Sam (Rory Culkin) has been bullied by fat, mean and obnoxious George (Josh Peck) with the latest incident (which opens the film) seeing him bashed leading to substantial bruises. Soon there is talk of revenge and with encouragement from his older brother (Trevor Morgan) and especially his brother's friend (Scott Mechlowicz) they ask George to a day on their boat to celebrate Sam's birthday. This is all just a ruse to humiliate George but, not surprisingly, things get out of hand. The plot is simple, perhaps even clichéd and in some ways predictable. However, the reason the film works so well is because of its excellent and convincing performances and realistic, believable characters. Sam's girlfriend (Carly Schroeder) is also along for the trip but she was unaware of the plans and in a way could be argued to be the film's stock female character. The film manages to remain suspenseful and gripping with some unexpected revelations which irrevocably change the character's lives.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A promising idea that turns into a bit of a mess
jimbo-53-18651123 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The problem I had with Mean Creek is that I never really found its premise to be believable; the fact we're told George is a 'bully' merely because he punched Sam a couple of times in the face. Do the writers even know what a bully is? A bully will usually target someone who's smaller and weaker than them and will usually do this for no other reason than to make themselves feel better about themselves. George warned Sam not to touch his camera and when Sam ignored him, George gave him a good hiding. Whilst I'm not condoning what George did, I hardly think his actions qualify him as a 'bully'.

After the altercation with Sam, George is then invited on a boat trip with Sam and his friends... Anyone in their right mind would refuse to go anywhere with a group of people who are friends with the person that you've just beaten up. I just found the entire premise ridiculous and unconvincing. I mean you have to ask yourself if it's really believable that a group of friends would go to that much trouble over 'one' altercation... sure you may go to these sort of lengths if George had been bullying Sam for months, but again I struggled to find a lot of this believable.

We're then treated to a tedious and long game of 'Truth Or Dare' which I felt was clumsily written into the story and just dragged on and on.

I also found the film to be quite boring as well and this is probably due to a large number of characters being rather shallow and lacking in depth (although Estes does flesh George out quite well). The performances were pretty weak across the board (with the exceptions of Mechlowicz and Peck who both managed to be far better than the material). At times the camera work was also nauseating and gave the film a very amateurish feel to it.

The final 20-25 minutes consist of the gang moralising over whether they have 'done' the right thing or whether they should 'do' the right thing. Whilst the narrative swings in this direction towards the end it never really offers much commentary and the messy and unresolved ending made me wonder what the point was in building the film up in this manner only to then offer no closure on the matter. George's monologue at the end made very little sense and created a disappointing finale to a disappointing film. It's a shame really as I could see a lot of potential here.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed