Crimson Gold (2003) Poster

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Excellent noir polemic
In September of 1980, as pretty much the first military operation of the Iran-Iraq war by ground forces, Iraqi forces captured the border post at Shalamcheh. Shalamcheh was later to be the site of the largest battle of the war, Operation Karbala-5. A passing reference to Crimson Gold's main character, Hussein, having been at Shalamcheh is made in the film. So what's quite easy to miss here, for a casual Western viewer, is that protagonist Hussein Emadeddin, sometime pizza deliveryman, is a war veteran. An Iranian viewer would be expecting this anyway; it was a huge war that engulfed the generation that Hussein belongs to. Not that many Iranians will see this movie, all Panahi's films are banned in his homeland. Shalamcheh is a resonant name to Iranians, and now contains a war memorial which many travel to. Part of the battle involved "human waves" which is to say lightly armed men, in large quantities charging the well-fortified Iraqi positions, basically suicide attacks. There are stories during the war of young men, apparently volunteers, charging the minefields, in order to clear them for the more experienced soldiers.

The Iran Iraq war was a particularly unpleasant throwback: commentators have compared it to World War One due to the predomination of trench warfare. In both wars for example there was the use of mustard gas, machine gun nests, shelling, and barbed wire. I think it's pretty much implied that Hussein has been a victim of the war. He's been taking cortisone on a long term basis. Due to the copious side effects, you don't do that unless there's something severely amiss, he would have to have a severe long term illness. Prolonged use of cortisone can be prescribed to treat severe lung disorders, I would suggest that Hussein may well have been gassed (hundreds of thousands of Iranian soldiers were gassed by sulphur mustard during the war, plus mustard was used at Shalamcheh during Operation Karbala-5, on civilian populations as well as Iranian troops).

The side effects of long term cortisone use include insomnia irritability, depression, swelling, obesity, diabetes, and depressed immune response. At one point Hussein has to climb four stories to deliver a pizza when a lift is out of order and the tenant won't come down; in the light of his condition, this appears rather more tragic. The character is very easy to sympathise with because, Hussein Emadeddin is played by Hussein Emadeddin, also a pizza deliveryman with severe health problems. There's a lot of realism here.

When thinking of post-war art in film, the term noir floats to the surface. Noir developed as an art form, if not necessarily an aesthetic, as a response to the zeitgeist of the Second World War's aftermath. An anonymous individual from the University Of San Diego has put it better than I can: "The historical setting is the contemporary world that has been corrupted and lost its moral certainty. The prevailing cynicism of characters reflects the reality of the atomic bomb, Cold War, totalitarianism, propaganda, Hollywood blacklist, corrupting power of the government and press. World War II fragmented men, caused them to feel adrift, insecure, alienated, a feeling of having "gone soft" and lacking power to control their lives. The liberal movement was in crisis, due to powerful forces of communism and materialism, causing a loss of faith in progress and man's innate goodness."

Since the war there's been a crisis for the liberal cause in Iranian society, which is referenced at one point by Hussein's friend Ali, who asks what it was like in (pre-theocratical) times when women walked around naked (without veils). It's clear that there's not much fun in the Iran of this world, in one scene Hussein asks a fifteen-year-old policeman if he's ever had fun, the young chap isn't even sure what the word means, and I think that makes two of them.

Despite Hussein having been pretty much left on the scrapheap, rotting in a dingy apartment to the tune of squeaking rats, he's a nice guy, and tries his best to be kind to folk. However, after a series of humiliations, he has had enough and commits a hideous folly. It's a film about injustice that manages to be, at the same time, warm-hearted, staggeringly beautiful and polemical. You can really take Hussein Emadeddin into your heart. Which is rare in a cinematic world where men are often armour plated and hard to love.

My respects for a profoundly humane film. Quite ironically it appears that Jafar Panahi was arrested within the last week whilst giving a dinner party at his home, an absurdity that you might think would make a good scene in a Panahi movie.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Life is tough. It actually kills you!
bzad5628 February 2006
Written by the most prominent figure in Iranian social realist cinema, Talaye Sorkh is very much suggestive of some social realities in contemporary Iran. Following an underclass pizza-delivery man for a day or two of his life, Panahi's camera pictures a story that speaks only not for Hussein, but also for many of his real-life fellow citizens in Tehran. Although the film appears to be highly critical of the current social gap between the rich and the poor, Talaye Sorkh is more about alienation and marginalization. Hussein is a war veteran who is devastated by the contradictions of the values he fought for in the Iran-Iraq war and what he witnesses in the affluent neighborhoods of northern Tehran, where he delivers pizzas. He is shocked to see a former lieutenant in one of those chic houses. Thanks to Hussein Emaduddin's great performance, the film by no means begs for sympathy. It seems that the tensions of the society in which Hussein lives, has made him an emotionless man. Hussein's toneless attitude and his unusual calmness speaks of a man whose tolerance comes to a rapid explosion at the end. He is a sort of man who is unable to even feel for his fiancé. Robbing young women's purse doesn't seem to interest him either. Throughout the entire film he is in a state of shock. Although the film's plot is based on a true story, its dialog seem a bit incompetent and weak at times. The dolly shots and the overall camera-work however perfectly contributes in suggesting a schizophrenic atmosphere which has indeed been the intention of Panahi as well. Panahi's latest film is very much similar in theme with his previous award winning Dayareh. That film is also recommended for those who enjoyed this one.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Takes its time, but never boring
cwx28 June 2006
It's positively amazing what you can sometimes get with non-professional actors, basically playing themselves, especially compared to the many times that real actors flub things entirely. This film follows the sad trajectory of a disaffected pizza delivery driver in Tehran, but while his journey is rooted in reality and presented, aside from the cuts from one scene to another, in something much like real time including all the boring waiting periods (and without the comforting style of similar scenes in Chinatown), the story itself is almost fantastical, probably in part because the people Hussein meets are, to no small degree, more symbolic than anything. The story is heartbreaking and the visuals held my interest without being flashy in the least. Most interestingly, director Jafar Panahi provides us with a removed, rational view of modern Iranian society even as he shows his considerable skill in unobtrusively guiding us along with one man's unfortunate journey.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Bravely depicts the powerlessness of the individual
howard.schumann3 January 2005
Winner of the Jury Award at the 2003 Cannes Film Festival but sadly banned in Iran, Jafar Panahi's Crimson Gold shows the growing chasm in Iran between rich and poor and the psychological effects of living under a regime based on fundamentalist religion. Written by famous Iranian director Abbas Kiarostami, it is based on a newspaper account of a similar incident that took place several years ago in Tehran. The film opens inside a jewelry store where a robbery is taking place. As a crowd gathers, the robber is trapped when the security system is released and the bars close over the front door. Flashbacks then show the events that led up to the crime and the film speculates as to what might have led to this act of desperation.

Hussein (Hossain Emadeddin), an alienated heavy set man who hides his emotions, is a pizza deliveryman in Tehran who takes cortisone shots to relieve the pain of injuries sustained in the Iran-Iraq War. He is engaged to be married to his friend Ali's (Kamyar Sheissi) sister but they communicate little. Ali is a thief who snatches women's purses but is an amateur bungler who rarely scores a big take. On examining the contents of a purse with Hussein at a restaurant, they discover the receipt for an expensive necklace and their fascination leads them to visit the jewelry store where it was purchased. When the owner refuses to let them in the store because of their dress, resentment boils.

Another incident reinforces this hurt. Hussein is forced by security police to wait outside a building as they arrest people attending a party for allegedly violating the social code of the regime that prohibits men and women from dancing together. Though he good-naturedly hands out pizzas to the police and the detainees waiting outside the building, he is upset at the manner in which he is treated. A bizarre final sequence raises Hussein's anger to the breaking point. He delivers a pizza to a lavish penthouse apartment where he is invited in by the wealthy tenant (Pourang Nakaheal), a young man who recently returned to Iran after staying with his parents in the U.S. The man, who appears to be lonely, talks incessantly, complaining about the "city of lunatics" he has returned to. As the young man chats on the cell phone, Hussein wanders through the house amazed at its affluence. He finds a rooftop swimming pool and jumps in fully clothed, then sits on the roof simply gazing at the city below. Fuming inwardly, the very next day he walks into the jewelry store with a loaded gun.

Crimson Gold bravely depicts the powerlessness of the individual in an authoritarian society, yet Hussein's emotional repressiveness and the telegraphing of the final outcome dilutes the film's tension, almost to the point of lethargy. To his credit, Panahi makes a strong statement but does not wallow in polemics, making it clear that the crime results from a combination of both social and psychological factors. Hussein is not an ordinary individual beaten down by the system but a walking time bomb, a man physically and mentally damaged by the war, uncommunicative, and humiliated by each slight, no matter how minor. Like Hussein, Panahi knows something about the feeling of being trapped and humiliated and his experience lends immediacy to the film. In 2001, the director was detained, then chained to a bench for ten hours because he refused to be fingerprinted and photographed by US authorities at JFK airport, a reminder that assaults upon human dignity are not limited to a single country.
51 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Crimson Gold
Ivane7 October 2004
"He motorbikes every evening to neighborhoods he will never live in, for a closer look at what goes on behind closed doors. But one Night, Hussain tastes the luxurious life, before his deep feelings of humiliation push him over the edge."

It's sad to see reviews - saying this is a boring movie... This movie is so good, that I totally forgot about WATCH or even Time. Hussain is one of the most interesting characters I have ever seen... and with no doubt Jafar Panahi with his 'The Circle' and 'Crimson Gold' one of the most talented directors of our time...

thx for this movie... I really enjoyed watching it on Tbilisi International Film Festival (just today)and I hope the movie gets the main prize...
33 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a clever director,a pizza delivery,a jewellery gallery,a shocked man ,a good movie
lonelymountain13 July 2005
Jafar Panahi is one of the best directors of Iran,his works are upon the best movies of the world,showing the social problems of Iran,after wards Sohrab Shahid Sales is the best choice for watching movies,Crimson gold is the story of Hossein a soldier in Iran-Iraq war who got toxicated by chemical bombs is a mugger,and he delivers pizzas when doing his job he confronts completely different situations which his within is dazzled by them,he saw his friend which he wad a soldier too ,in a luxurious house,Hossein delivered pizza to his house and the price was 20.5 $,he paid him 21 bucks instead an d told him ,keep the tip,he saw the pain if society,he saw the pain within,every time he went to the jewellery's galleries he confronted with shocking prices, this movie is unrealizable for foreigners because they don't know the picture of our society and it's levels, first our society had three levels but the second level is vanishing and there will be only the level that lives in poverty ,and the level that is vomiting money, this movie is not the best movie,it's good but it has some boring scenes,but the direction,camera angles are good, this movie has somethings hided behind the scenes,you should know Iran to see this movie by the way i give it 7.2 out of 10
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Universal story
marinelad4 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Two unbelievable men, true humanists and visionaries have brought their minds together to create Crimson Gold and they have made universal story about social deprivation and humiliation that could be applied in any part of the world. Truly, this is an Iranian film that looks less Iranian than any other I have seen so far. The plot could be placed anywhere in the world where people live their cheerless lives, work for miserable salaries and get humiliated every day. Moreover, Kiarostami's scenario is based upon a true event.

Hussein's job is poorly paid pizza delivery and it cannot provide him with enough money to buy simple jewels for his future wife, but can clearly show him that some other people do not have such problems. His customers often have fun with prostitutes, buy modern, expensive jewels from abroad, have parties in luxury apartments and obviously do not have money-related problems while Hussein and his best friend and future brother-in-law are not even allowed to enter the fancy jewels store. Simple man, excellently interpreted by Hossain Emadeddin, suffers quietly and does not share his frustrations with anyone, but in the act of pure despair decides to rob the store and steal the most expensive necklace. Like everything else in his sad life, this action turns the wrong way and does not bring any release but on the contrary, ends with suicide. The robbery is actual beginning of the film and it takes some time to realize that, in the real time, it is the end of the gloomy story as everything that happens later in the film progressively leads to the only possible ending.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What movies are supposed to be like!
houman198331 May 2005
It is regrettable that some comments have described the movie as boring and tedious. In the west, we have been raised with a version of cinema presented by Hollywood that provides quick indulgence and satisfaction; well not only cinema, a lot others as well. Movies that lack this characteristic, being ironically closer to reality and providing an insight into the world we live in, are judged as "weak," and "boring." Allegorical cinema is the strongest cinema no question, and Iranian cinema has been an efflux of such examples during the past decade; "Crimson Gold" is a perfect example.

It might come out as strange, but for a change, a movie has been able to capture the real life, the real social struggles of the society; and this doesn't just pertain to the Iranian society, but the description is one of ecumenical. The pace matches the pace of real life, as one other commentator put it so eloquently, it SHOULD be slow, and it SHOULD be agonizing to watch it, simply because that's what the movie is trying to portray, and that's how real life is experienced. The slow pace of the movie, following every move of the main character, makes the movie even more poignant. One can put self in Hussain's shoes, and feel the pain and humiliation he feels when he walks into the Jewlery store, case in point.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ordinary and boring
Scorching19 July 2004
Crimson Gold is the first ever Iranian film I ever have watched and I usually make such a basis for future viewings of films from the said country. Well based on this film I doubt I will be seeing any films from Iran in the near future.

I found the film rather boring and tedious and some of the scenes were dragging and seemed senseless. It was so boring that I would find myself looking at my watch so many times and praying that it ended sooner rather than later. It is not very often I found anything as dry as this.

The start was rather promising but it really failed after that. It did have a good message to portray though. A picture of the social inequalities of Iranian society were portrayed in many scenes such as the the Jewelry shop, and the rich man he had dinner with. I just wish the director had tried to make things a little more interesting and lively.
4 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very powerful and well made
aydin-t8 May 2005
from the director of "The circle" and "The White balloon" comes another revolutionary film from the Iranian cinema, there are aspects in this film that only an Iranian would understand, or someone who is familiar with the situation in Iran, and how it crosses the red line many times. The film shows the huge gap in the society in Iran between the rich and the poor, too bad that this film attracts the wrong audience, some watch this film and expect the film to continue like what it was in the first few minutes. Another factor that makes this movie so great in the Iranian cinema is the techniques used in it, there were camera works that had never been done in the Iranian cinema, refer to the scene in which Hossein was lying in his bed to see this. overall i think this was a great movie and it gets a 10 out of 10 from my unbiased point of view.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
very clever movie
dannycantwakeup16 October 2003
Saw this at the NYFF. The director could not attend the screening because Iranian visitors to the US have be fingerprinted upon entering the country. The film follows Hussein, an obese pizza delivery guy, whose suicide we witness in the first agonizingly long take. Then through flashbacks we get to know him. Or rather we simply witness his life in a militarized state. We get to see how much people rely on this pretty boring man. His soon-to-be-brother-in-law. His hopelessly lonely fiancee. Even the people he delivers pizzas to. In one way or another he suddenly becomes the center of their stories. The pace is purposely SLOW. By the end of the film you don't feel bad about his death. You leave feeling both empty and sentimental. Much like his life. For me it felt freeing.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Just another Iranian movie
MubukuGrappa18 July 2006
This is just another Iranian movie...It's like what I read about Florence in the Lonely Planet guidebook..that it astonishes you, and then slowly you come to terms with it and its beauty and you take it for granted that everything in Florence is grand and excellent. The same could be said for many of the Iranian movies, made by giants such as Kiorastami, Makhmalbaf and Panahi. This is just another of those movies...movies that cannot go wrong! The story is interesting, acting is natural and the dialogue is, to a large extent, minimum.

What I like most about Iranian movies is that they are never preachy and they do not make fuss about anything, but simply, subtly drive their point(s) home....just like how we act in real life.

People who did not like this movie, should watch the Arnold or Chuck Norris movies during the weekends in Fox 11 TV channel.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very slow and boring
mvl-731 December 2005
According to the DVD booklet this movie can be compared to Taxi Driver. Well, the only thing I find similar is the pace of the camera-work and the speed in which the story unfolds. My god, what a very slow and boring movie! Normally, a slower pace can be an element of added value, or even a necessity. In this case, it's mainly annoying. It really doesn't add to the atmosphere of the story, its rather old-fashioned film-making. Maybe also because it doesn't lead anywhere. The storyline is thin, with a theme of wealth vs poor that I don't find very credible, mainly the ignorance of poor. The only positive point I can think of is that the movie gives some more insight in the environments of Teheran. Some newer good movies come from Iran, this just is not one of them. I watched the second part of the movie in fast-forward.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent recent chapter in Iranian film
estephan5 November 2004
This is a bit of a dream team coming together for a recent iranian film: Kiarostami writes and Panahi directs. And the film is an appropriate hybrid. It has the sloow, thoughtful, gritty realistic, real-life dialogue laden, meandering-but-focused story that Kiarostami makes, along with the focus on social injustice that Panahi had in the Circle.

It's on the top ten for Iranian film which means definitely get it. Great film. Great photography. Lots of teheran and iranian morality police -- cool. If you can't stand movies that don't have a clear Hollywood plot -- if you don't like art house movies -- if you get bored or tired in slow movies -- don't rent it.
19 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
wonderfully patient movie that bludgeons you with its purpose
thelordgabe4 August 2004
One of the absolutely most beautiful movies i have seen in a long time... This movie moves at the speed of life - or that of the main character in the film. Hussein reminds me of Forrest Whitaker in Ghost Dog... aside from the obvious physical similarities they are both men of integrity... they are both reliable purveyors of their intended perspective.

Anyway, this movie does not suffer from gratuitous slowness... Hussein's pace is juxtaposed with that of everyone/everything else in the movie... Saying that this movie is weak because it is too slow is like saying that you hate women because their voices are shrill... GET OVER IT! THIS MOVIE *SHOULD* BE PAINFUL TO WATCH!!! If how and to what degree a movie affects you is a criteria for how "good" it is, then this movie is the lovechild of Barry Bonds and the Pope... ...dig the shot when Hussein enters onto the freeway/gridlock (towards the beginning of the film)...
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent Film by Panahi in Toronto Film Festival
anooshiravan8 September 2003
Another films by Panahi, and yet another success for him and the Iranian movie industry. This was parhaps the perfect timing for an Iranian movie to shine tonight in the Toronto Film Festival (Sep 2003), especially when in the very begining he dedicated his movie to late Zahra Kazemi, the murdered Iranian- Canadian journalist (who was brutally murdered under arrest in Iran).

The movie was very strong in its view towards the current lifestyle in Iran, with the main charactor Hussein who appears to be the second generation of "HAJJI" in Makhmalbaf's Marriage of the Blessed (Aroosie Khoobaan). Panahi's Hussein is the grown up Makhmalbaf's Hajji, after 25 years of revolution in Iran, with little if any future in Iran.

Panahi brilliantly spoke on behalf the middle class people of Iran, who are ost in the internal challenge of poverty and affluence in Iran, pressured by the tyrany of government and its security forces. The movie will bring Panahi lots of success abroad, but it's a pity that the movie is already banned in Iran. I hope all the fellow Iranians in Iran can also see the movie and enjoy Panahi's view.

Good luck Panahi, and long live Iran!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Crimson Gold
ninamohadjer19 May 2006
This was a very interesting and well done movie. I was impressed how the director was able to capture the class clash in the country and how he used Hossein to show the differences of people who live in the same geographical region. While Hossein is mostly used as the "camera" the director shows how the classes have distanced each other and how small a "midlle" class has become in Iran of post 1979. I was mostly impressed by the scene within the jewelry store how the store owner treats two couples completely different, without haven had a full 5 sentence conversation with any of them, but justifying his behavior and ' customer service' simply on the class of his customers.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
excellent minimalist movie
jaberalu26 September 2005
Great script writing, served here by brilliant movie making by one of Iran's major directors. As we follow this character (Hussein) through his day to day life, we start to understand the scope of the film, and we discover new and startling images of Iran.

This film is a strong political pamphlet, a vivid critic of the actual political and religious regime in power.

The style of the film is very minimalist, and is mostly steady shots, with little editing. But the action and the rhythm of the story comes from what is happening inside the image.

A must see for any foreigner who wants to understand what everyday life is in Iran.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Iranian style Pizza delivery
FilmCriticLalitRao18 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Crimson Gold" is one of those rare films made in recent times which does not feature themes and characters which have become hallmark of Iranian cinema.We have seen films about angelic children and lonely, frustrated women and housewives.At this juncture,we are talking of an Iranian cinema which is honored at film festivals all over the world but is banned at home by cultural authorities as Iranian audiences feel that their films have failed to depict a truthful portrayal of their country.This is also the case of this film as it was banned in Iran after winning critical acclaim outside of Iran.In the past,Jafar Panahi used to make innocuous films about innocent kids and harassed women.As he wanted to do something different,something original,he decided to film an actual event involving a heist which took place in Teheran.In the making of "Crimson Gold",Abbas Kiarostami has helped Jafar Panahi to direct a unique film in the history of Iranian cinema.It is one of those rare films that has an urban feel.One can see cars,motorbikes and well lit roads.As in many Iranian films of recent times young protagonists have been shown as highly critical of moral policing prevalent in Iran.It is true that the suicide of the main character remains a crucial plot of the film.It is for viewers to ascertain the reasons which induced him to take such an extreme step. Crimson Gold is a film which conveys that it is not poverty but desperation,frustration,hopelessness which induce people to commit crime and suicide.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchable Tedium
armsandman-128 March 2004
I am baffled by critics who applaud something so poorly written, directed, and acted. This is a good case of The Emperor's New Clothes.

Instead of this tedious attempt at signifigance, I'd rather watch a double bill of The Bicycle Thief and Taxi Driver.

I love movies, but when I give up after a full hour, something must be wrong. In a word: pacing. Another word: cliché.

Certainly, there is a cachet in heralding an underdog film like this, banned in its home country, but the praise is a bit self-congratulatory, coming from Western critics.

Does the scene outside a luxury apartment -- where our hero is restrained by the police from delivering his pizzas -- does such a scene need a full third of the movie's running time?
10 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the best films of the year
hyegodfather81813 January 2005
Crimson Gold, one of the best films of the year, is absolutely stunning from start to finish. It's gritty and captures the essence of the social struggles in Iran while consistently delivering messages on the struggles we all face in life regarding love and relationships. It's a humanistic film that is extremely subtle, which turned off several viewers (as does Taxi Driver, one of my all-time favorites). Jafar Panahi's slow pacing doesn't allow the film to go into incoherent territory, but again, some viewers may be turned off by this. The pacing is really what allows the messages to set in and provoke the viewers thoughts. It's worth every second of your time, don't miss this gem.

9/10
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Motorbike Shield Acts Both Ways
p_radulescu11 January 2011
It starts like a film noir, a scene of robbery with an absurd outcome, excellently shot, with an incredible rhythm, with guts, and one could expect the movie will go on this way, kind of Quentin Tarantino on the steroids. Actually this starting scene, coming again at the end, is the moment of explosion in the story.

Crimson Gold, released in 2003, with Jafar Panahi as director and Abbas Kiarostami as screenwriter; it is the second movie of this tandem that I've watched (the other was The White Balloon). Two films showing a society that rejects the people who don't fit in the canons. In The White Balloon it's the Afghan boy (only there the idea is subtly hidden up to the end). Here in Crimson Gold, it's Hussein, the pizza delivery guy, who is played by a non-professional, Hossain Emadeddin. Like his personage, he is in real life a pizza delivery man. Like his personage, he is under medication for a form of schizophrenia. His performance is remarkable. Looking always like he's carrying all his household with him everywhere he goes, while able exactly this way to induce the feeling that he is his own guy. Silent, quiet, apparently in total selfcontrol, while able exactly this way to communicate to us his terrible tensions that boil in himself and make him a walking time-bomb.

As a schizophrenic, Hussein sees the society through his own mirror (and the idea of shooting him so often through the shield of his motorbike is genial). Actually, that shield acts both ways: Hussein is in turn the perfect mirror of the society surrounding him. It is a society sick of the same schizophrenia, an absurd universe where everybody is hostile to all the others, parents are denouncing their children, police arrest anybody for anything, simple people float freely toward petty crime, rich people are surrounded by a richness that is absurd by lack of meaning.

Each sequence of the movie calls for a moment of disruption, you cannot stand to such absurdity, you have to explode, and there are small disruptions all along, culminating with the big one, the failed robbery.

It's not only about Iran, as many reviewers consider. This film is a metaphor, and a metaphor is universal. The movie is banned in Iran while its director was not allowed to enter US to assist at the screening there. Director Jafar Panahi is banned in his own country and is suspected elsewhere as coming from his own country.

The robbery scene that links the beginning and the end of the movie shows a universe that is circular with no way to escape (also in The White Balloon the first and the last scenes are the same). It's an extremely nihilistic movie: there is no superior order (cosmic or divine) to show us the way, to offer us solace, to teach us higher wisdom. The whole universe is a walking time-bomb.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sad, but thoughtful, bungled heist Iranian style
Stephen Newton18 October 2003
A sad, but thoughtful, film in which the main protagonist struggles in vain to find his place in a complex and contradictory Iran. The bungled heist that both starts and ends the piece makes for a most pathetic cry for help.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
If You're Only Going To See One Iranian Film See This One
Theo Robertson21 March 2017
I always go in to a film open minded. If we're talking contemporary Iranian cinema then it almost certainly means one thing - static , neorealist cinema where the characters speak Sorani or Farsi instead of Italian. If there's one ironic thing in life you should make a note of then that is always expect to be surprised and CRIMSON GOLD took me out of my complacency and surprised me

Directed by Jafar Panahi from a screenplay by Abbas Kiarostimi , this is the twin counter-offensive by the purveyors of Iranian New Wave cinema and both film makers exceed themselves in much the same way as CRIMSON GOLD exceeded my expectations. This is a film that mirrors the existentialist ethos of New Hollywood , a peak of 20th Century American film making and probably the best role model any aspiring film maker can learn from and I found myself constantly reminded of a criminally underrated Hollywood movie from 1978 called STRAIGHT TIME

CRIMSON GOLD is essentially a crime drama , but the subtext screams despite individuals committing crimes against other individuals in pursuit of material greed this is relatively small fry compared to the crimes inflicted against the individual by a self elected self serving theocratic elite on the grounds of metaphysical principal The plotting isn't all that important . What is important is a number of pivotal scenes featuring Hussein ( An unfortunate name for a Persian) and how he fits in to the spectatorship of life in general and present day life of a deeply unpopular theocracy in particular . Perhaps the two most important ones are Hussein's conversation with the Pasdaran footsoldier outside an illegal party and the scene inside the house where nail varnish is mistaken for menstrual blood

It goes without saying this was banned in Iran by The Ministry Of Culture And Islamic Justice for being "Too dark" and we're not talking about the cinematography here. I caught the film on youtube and unsurprisingly youtube internet access is impossible in Iran thanks to The Ministry Of Culture And Islamic Justice so if you've got the chance to see CRIMSON GOLD please watch it and count your secular democratic blessings which are presently denied to the oppressed people of Iran
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I am not inferior...
raszam31 December 2021
What really causes the rebellion? Is it because some people are very rich and some "others" are very poor? This answer may be the reason for many of the social uprisings we see in the communist revolutions. But there is another important reason. A reason that does not cause social uprisings, but causes individual crimes in society. The movie "Crimson Gold" tries to show this kind of rebellion. When people are in the wrong social class. When human beings with high personalities but are imprisoned in the poor class of society and a society that gives them no opportunity to show their talents other than the criterion of wealth, The "rebellion" begins, And this is how the rebel overthrows him from his wrong position.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed