Stay (2005) Poster

(I) (2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
451 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Another way of looking at it
michaelprescott-0054716 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Most of the reviews assume that there's no supernatural element in the story, and that Henry's experience is simply an extended hallucination. I'd like to suggest a different reading.

After regaining his sight, Henry's father says, "The Buddhists got it right. It's all an illusion." This could be taken as a reference to the Buddhist idea of Maya, but it could also be understood as a reference to the immediate postmortem state described in the Tibetan (Buddhist) Book of the Dead. In this state, we are told, the newly dead (or not quite dead) person inhabits a world of thought-forms. Unless he recognizes these forms as illusory, he will be trapped on the wheel of rebirth.

It's clear that the random persons gathered at the scene of Henry's accident are the inspiration for the thought-forms peopling his experience. But I'm not so sure the same applies to the three people Henry knew in life - mother, father, girlfriend. All of them died before Henry, and I suspect that when they appear in his story, they are not thought-forms but spirits sharing his dream in the bardo.

Each has a different level of awareness. Henry's father is entirely unaware. Like Bruce Willis in The Sixth Sense, he does not know he is dead. He does not even know his own identity. He is blind, literally and symbolically, until Henry opens his eyes, prompting him to say, "I see ... everything," as well as his words about Buddhism. Having seen through the illusion, he walks out of the shared dream experience and disappears.

Henry's mother is somewhat aware all along. She knows who she is, she knows something bad happened, but she is confused about the details and does not know she is dead. Her cloudy thinking is indicated by the scarf around her head, suggestive of brain trauma. Like an earthbound spirit, she haunts her own house (which she visualizes unfurnished, as it will be after the estate sale) and conjures up a long-dead pet for company. She recognizes Sam as Henry because all the thought-forms are projections of Henry's mind.

Finally, Henry's girlfriend appears to be fully aware of her circumstances. She is shown acting a role in a play, which is precisely what she is doing in Henry's experience. She places special emphasis on Hamlet's line, "I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams," an exact description of Henry's condition (spoken in Sam's presence, because, like the mother, she recognizes Sam as Henry's alter ego).

Her name is given only as Athena. I suspect this is an alias generated by Henry's mind; Athena was a goddess, and Henry was devoted to this woman. Even Henry's last name, Letham, appears to be an alias. It's an anagram of Hamlet, whose bad dreams disturbed the infinite space of his subjective prison, and who is the literary character most closely associated with pondering one's own mortality.

There are many possible interpretations, of course, but I think this one may come closest to the filmmakers' intentions. Then again, I might be completely wrong!
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The 2-films-in-1 phenomenon
Rogue-3221 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I think the very first movie I ever saw that absolutely required a second viewing was Angel Heart, back in 1987. The second viewing is necessary because after you know what you know from the initial viewing, you get to watch an entirely different film the second time around. Angel Heart was considered before its time when it was released, and since then, indeed there has been a spate of these kinds of films, some more successful than others.

Stay is one of these 2-films-in-1 experiences, but this film, unfortunately, is not as successful (in my eyes) as, say, The Sixth Sense, Memento, The Machinist or even Angel Heart. Those films succeed brilliantly because they manage to evoke a chilling impact on the viewer by the end. Stay, on the other hand, left me more confused than anything, even though I understood what had happened: -=- SPOILER ALERT -=- The film takes place in the consciousness of Ryan Gosling's character, Henry, who is teetering between life and death after a terrible car accident which killed the other passengers in his vehicle (his mother, his father and his soon-to-be-fiancée). This is a horrendous tragedy, what has happened to Henry: if you can imagine being near death but yet aware that your 3 closest loved ones have been killed in an accident that you inadvertently caused (his tire blew out) - this is a monumentally sad thing to have happen to you, but yet this sadness was not effectively conveyed at the end of the movie because I was instead confused about what had transpired and I had to think about it in depth afterwards to realize that Ewan McGregor's character Sam (who seemed to be the main character of the movie) was also part of Henry's semi-conscious hallucinatory state.

There were just too many scenes in the film that Henry didn't appear in (although McGregor and the always-fantastic Naomi Watts are perfectly cast in their 'roles', as is Gosling). In retrospect, I think this is what caused the confusion and left me not feeling the impact that should have been felt at the realization of what had just transpired. -=- END OF SPOILER. -=-

I don't like making comparisons, but The Sixth Sense, for instance, was hugely successful because it was written in such a way that it included the viewer in Bruce Willis' shocking realization at the end; it has the impact it does (even on repeat viewings!) because of the masterful way it's staged.

What I'm saying is, while Stay is a noble and ambitious effort and still worthy (in my opinion) of a couple of viewings, it's not enough to have a movie that becomes a second movie once you've seen it - the movie has to stand on its own the FIRST time; the impact has to be there the first time or there's no genuine payoff for the viewer. I love a movie that haunts you afterwards and makes you think, that's the best kind of film, but there does have to be that impact the first time, that all-important creeping sense of realization that makes your eyes go wide and gives you goosebumps.
67 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A different point of view
joely211217 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
There is such a debate about this movie, on side arguing that you can "get it" if you are intelligent enough and the other arguing there is nothing to "get." Why don't you all stop worrying about whether or not you get it or not. Movies are art, and art is open to different interpretations. There is no right or wrong, and to steal a quote that I loved, (I can't remember exactly "Bad Art is even better because it documents human failure") sorry that quote wasn't really necessary and didn't fit my point exactly but I was just dying to use it.

Anyway my main interpretation of the movie is to show the intricacies of the human brain. A man went through a serious shock/trauma, going unconscious, allowing his subconscious to come out and play, the movie demonstrates the power of the subconscious, pulling out stored tidbits of information from the brain received by the human senses. The movie documents not the man's physical struggle to stay alive but his mental one. With his brain setting up a maze of obstacles to get past to regain consciousness/life. In this maze of his mind I think his actual self represents death or the coming of death, and he is in the form of the psychologist (mcgregor) trying to work his way through the maze to fight to stay alive. I think this is why we saw the movie makes such a point of showing us that they are the same person (in his mind) I think he has chosen mcgreggor as his self because in his subconscious he knows that in the real life mcgreggor is trying to save him. As for the powers, it is his mind of course he is able to control what is happening. Leaving one end untangled, the de ja vu with mcgregor and watts at the end. To go with the flow of this interpretation, that the movie is demonstrating the power of the human mind, perhaps subconsciously the mans dream was able to affect the other people involved, through psychic powers, I'm not sure on this, this is a tough cookie.

Of course another interpretation of this movie could possibly be two parrelel worlds colliding through an event (car crash) I don't know for sure I can only make my own interpretations, and I like this movie because of the different ways it can be interpreted, unlike most Hollywood movies, which leave no room for the imagination. This is art, good art: 8/10
108 out of 137 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wonderfully executed masterpiece
Gordon-1120 May 2006
I saw this in the cinema solely because I had nothing else to do and that Ewan McGregor was in it. I had no idea what it was about. I am so glad that I watched it, because this film left me thinking for ages.

This is a thriller about a psychiatrist (which I happen to be one) trying to help a depressed & suicidal patient. The film twists unexpectedly all the time without getting bizarre. The visual effects are stunning, and the soundtrack created the eerie atmosphere which gave me creeps. The best thing about this film is that the film keeps you in suspense throughout the film, without the use of sudden loud noises, gore or scary scenes. Everything in the film seemed so every day life (to me anyway) and yet it keeps you on the edge all the time. The interspersed scenes of unrelated objects creates suspense in a way that is surreal. In the ending, I was totally surprised at that happened. I had to really think a lot to figure out what happened. Usually, when I don't understand a film, I say it is bad bad bad, but for this film, it leaves me wanting to find out more about it.

I strongly recommend anyone to watch this film!
123 out of 169 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stay 101
dkwilliams217 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Understandably, there is so much debate about the context of this movie, what it means, if it's genius or pointless, what's actually going on, etc., etc., etc. In a nutshell, I'm summarizing the most prominent aspects of what I gathered this movie to portray because it seems it's been treated with so much intrication and over-analyzing: A kid is in the process of his life and consciousness fading out as, in REALITY, he has just experienced a fatal car accident. The whole movie takes place from the perspective *of what's going on in his head*. His subconscious and various other mental processes and brain activity is going to work, which constitutes most of what you see in the movie. That explains all the non-real events that occur from time to time throughout the movie. Nothing too clever because again as we find out, it was all not reality. It would have been quite the trick if it in fact was reality, and somehow they had an explanation where it all made sense. But in that case, one could argue that there would be no real theoretical value to the movie.

Anyway, what the dying character is doing subconsciously, is "pulling" in people surrounding him from the outside or in reality, and has represented them as characters in his dream-state. The main character, Ewan McGregor, in his mind is the psychologist trying to save him from dying, parallel to that in reality, the person of an entirely different form who is trying to save his life from the injuries of his car accident.

The movie depicts events that set out to question or challenge the state of reality in our minds, what is real, how what isn't real can transcend with what is real, and vice versa. Basically, the whole "life is but a dream" spill.

But alas, where have we seen this before? Well, unfortunately this movie joins the masses of other reality/mind-bending movies (i.e., The Matrix, The Jacket, Secret Window, The Butterfly Effect) that set out to get the wheels turning over the true nature of our existence in conjunction with reality and fantasy, dreams, and perception as a whole.

For that reason, as well constructed and beautifully executed as this movie was on an aesthetic level, I found nothing new from the movie and all of the mind-bending events simply being chalked up to the kids brain wigging out while he is in the process of dying left me feeling extremely disappointed and almost used. In all honestly, in the back of my mind I kind of gathered this is what the movie was all about, but desperately indulged in the hope of wanting there to be something more to the ending than again, it just pretty much being all a dream - which is something I consider to be the cheapest and lamest way to culminate the events of a plot.

In the end, there wasn't more to it...just strange events that turn out to be the kids fading mind and a few symbolic events that ONCE AGAIN, propose the speculation of reality.

My position on this movie is don't buy into the overused science. This movie is not all that clever, or the work of art that a lot of reviewers are deeming it. This movie is just a somewhat satisfying and intriguing experience until the ending hits and what once stimulated the senses to a degree, now feeds it dog food.
39 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Misses the mark
travisyoung20 March 2008
Ultimately it's a richly textured, multi-faceted look at the relationship between guilt and love, death and life. Suicidal themes run amuck, so, as you can imagine, there are many dark, intense scenes between talented actors. And the performances really are great, as is the mind-bending cinematography. But its way overwritten...the truly brilliant "interesting plot device" mingles but never bonds with the characters or dialogue, so everything falls flat. It's not rewarding, because insignificant elements overshadow details crucial to experiencing the intended impact of the film.

If you want to see an astonishingly filmed, well acted movie, here it is, have fun...But Stay breaks the first commandment of film-making because it takes itself more seriously than its subject. At the end of the day, the message the filmmakers seem to communicate is, "see what we did!" instead of "see what we mean."
37 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
the most underrated movie of 2005
Barshki8 April 2006
Have you heard of Stay? If you're here you must have but I'll bet it wasn't too long ago that you found out about it. It's a movie that came out late last year with little fanfare, was dismissed as a poor movie by critics and quickly ushered back out of theaters.

It's a crying shame.

It was a wonderful movie. My favorite type of movies are psychological horror movies. Favorites include: Jacob's Ladder, Mulholland Dr., Donnie Darko, and in a similar realm, Momento and Fight Club. I love seeing a good representation of the human mind on film and that is exactly what this film shows so well.

It's about a college student (Ryan Gosling) who tells his shrink (Ewan McGregor) that he is going to kill himself on the stroke of midnight this Saturday, leaving his shrink to enlist the help of his formerly suicidal girlfriend (Naomi Watts) to figure out why he wants to kill himself and how to stop him, while his world falls apart.

It's directed by Marc Forster of Monster's Ball and Finding Neverland fame. The movie has been called pretentious, shallow, ridiculous, bewildering, absurd, and empty by many reviewers. Personally I think that they didn't have the patience for it and/or were put off by its extravagant visuals and cuts. I thought it was great and deserves much more credit than it has received.

The movie's visual style is very interesting and jarring in a good way. It had me constantly saying to my girlfriend "did you see that?" Full of slight of the hand camera/editing tricks. Nearly everything in the movie is symbolic of other things or ideas in the movie. The acting is very good, especially among the lesser characters. Everything in the movie feels so unreal, but that is serves some purpose even if one couldn't know what it is right away. A second viewing would reveal many new things. In the end much of the movie is left up to interpretation and my girlfriend and I had a good conversation about our ideas on what things meant in the movie. After thinking about it for a day I'm pretty sure that I could explain everything in the movie, even what the hell is up with Ewan McGregor's pants, Why Gosling wanted to commit suicide and the twins and triplets.

It was fun was figuring out what the rest of the movie meant after seeing its end, the solution. The movie is like a code and the end is the decryption key. It differs from other "sixth sense" type surprise ending movies because everything you would see in the movie before the end would not act as a clue to what it all means or what the ending is. It's more like decrypting a diary than a problem with a solution to it.

Basically, any movie buff owes it to themselves to see this movie. I rented it but after seeing it I fully intend to purchase the DVD.
232 out of 279 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Could Have Been Remarkable
finding-something18 April 2006
While the direction is flawless, the art direction unparalleled, and despite Ewan McGregor providing another breathtaking and engrossing animation of character, the film is, unfortunately, fundamentally flawed. It's story is lazy.

Images will stay in your mind for months afterward. The wall of books, Sam's too short pant legs, the staircase that seems to have been built on its side, the film is nothing short of a breakthrough visually. It never really cuts, it's absolutely seamless from scene to scene. The special effects are truly special. The movie is absolute eye candy, and shot totally unconventionally, breaking the 180 degree rule almost constantly to brilliant affect.

First, how the story works. The way the narrative unfolds, the story itself becomes a kind of character, and a very good one at that. Sam is a wealthy psychiatrist, seemingly beginning to break down, prone to bending the rules of the trade, while Henry, a patient, is undeniably a mess mentally. As a result, we see the events through the eyes of, well we're not sure. Probably one of these two characters. This is the gimmick-going-for-genius-but-fails of the film, the audience is only ever as sure of anything as either of the main characters seem to be. We plunge with them down to the depths of their ever increasing madness. We accompany them on their journey, trying to make sense of an utterly senseless world.

Now, how it doesn't work. The twist is just not tight enough. If you're going to write a story where ultimately nothing happens, then the twist better be brilliant, I mean perfect. Here it is not. While it is interesting and complicated and even good, it pales in comparison to the other components of the film. It fails at any psychological or philosophical profundity, and fails as a rewarding narrative. The story alone, I'd only give 3 stars. So, while I'm unsure just how this movie ever got made based on its story, I am glad that it was. A true treat for the eyes and the imagination.
31 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A brilliant film about a young man near death
Melissa_198223 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to comment on this film without including a spoiler, but I feel it is necessary to try because of all of the unwarranted bad reviews this film is receiving. If you go into it expecting to see a rendition of The 6th Sense, you might be disappointed. If you go into it expecting to see a logical plot with a chronological story behind it and an honest portrayal of developed characters, you will be disappointed and very confused.

However, if you go see this film with an open mind and simply EXPERIENCE what it has to offer, you will be rewarded greatly at the end - assuming, of course, that you understand what you have just seen, at least to some degree. For the best experience, pay attention to the little details, but don't try to figure anything out until the end. See it with someone so that you can discuss it afterward. It's that good.

This movie is visually appealing and artistically constructed - pleasing to both the eye AND to the mind.
361 out of 467 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beautiful architecture, spatial orgasm
petarrosic28 October 2023
Story is fine; Idea of distorted reality starts showing very soon, story ends in a way that makes u want to think about movie more as an allegory of mental states than modest version of Lynch movies; Which is good, it's like filtration of mulholland drive through LVT melancholia.

Scenes showing amazing space design were my favorite; Beside clearly beautiful spaces (Sams wife art studio being my fav) movie really emphasize on spatial awareness: Some scenes will movie in closed space, like behind a window, or will move into open space from behind window perspective. Piano hanging from building and helium balloon flying off like c u MF feels cool.

It's worth watching; It feels good, architecture is beautiful, good lines, definitely not a waste of time.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Huh?
dmiles7777 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I like a movie that makes you think. "Stay" is that type of movie. Right off the bat, the director makes it clear that this not a straight-forward narrative so pay attention...there is unusual stuff coming...puzzle pieces...imagery...hints...oddities...quirks...visual weirdness...deepness. With this type of movie, the director is making a deal with you...stick with this movie, ride out the confusion, and I will deliver to you, as a reward, an effective ending or, at least, some satisfaction.

Unfortunately, "Stay" does not deliver. The movie is so steeped in visual tricks, symbolism, and strangeness it becomes a chore. The movie became tedious, with each scene trying to be more clever than the last. My friends and I gave up trying to put together the pieces and began to obsess on Ewan McGregor's weird high-water pants. We guessed...hmmm, we've seen this stuff before (dream? split personality? is someone dead and doesn't know it?) Truly, you could go scene by scene dissecting the weirdness (the kid with the balloon, the twins and triplets walking around, the Bob Hoskins character, etc.) It's just too much work.

The movie had a couple of redeeming qualities. The director seemed to experiment with every conceivable camera angle possible, which, at times, was intriguing. The editing, while jarring, was expertly done. Also, Ryan Gosling was compelling as the mysterious suicidal young guy. Unfortunately, Ewan McGregor and his pants were badly miscast and Naomi Watts is forgettable.

And the ending. Cop out. While it provided a small "aha", it was unoriginal and unsatisfying. Probably most savvy movie goers had it pretty much figured out anyway (or close to it). In the end, the movie is not nearly as smart as it thinks it is. It is like getting a 10,000 piece puzzle and realizing it's not worth the effort to put it together.
57 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A top notch Lynch-y psychological thriller
evilmatt-322 October 2005
This is really a spectacular film. I know I'm going to have to see it at least once more, because there's so much stuff going on that it's impossible to give Stay the attention in deserves in one viewing.

First and foremost, although I won't give away the plot here, I'll say that the movie (thankfully) does not rely on a surprise ending for the totality of its impact. In fact, if you're paying attention, you can pretty much figure out (mostly) what the situation is before you get too far into the movie. Unlike some of the worst examples of this genre (i.e. The Sixth Sense), Stay is not a film that "hides the ball," but instead presents you with characters and a storyline, and asks you to draw your own conclusions.

That said, there isn't an obvious solution to the movie. While you may be able to explain the film after viewing it (which is trickier that it will seem at first), you may realize that the real brilliance of this film is in the levels of its narrative. At its core, it is a basic psychological thriller. Simultaneously, and perhaps subconsciously, it also meditates on weighty issues of reality and identity- consider what the imperative "Stay" means to different characters at different points in the film, and it's almost like you're watching an entirely different movie than you originally thought.

Finally, the visuals in this movie provide their own context and narrative regarding the fragile nature of human memory and perception. This is the best looking movie I've seen in a long time, and the fact that it's combined with such a great story and cast makes this a rare treat.

If there is a weak link here, it's probably Gosling, who I think missed some opportunities to really dig in with his character and creep us out. Still his acting is better than that of most of Hollywood's garbage these days.

Final verdict: if you want a smart and unsettling film that will spur a serious discussion, watch this. You won't be disappointed.
323 out of 439 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A (trite) examination of one man's journey through purgatory
krachtm2 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I'm amazed that there are people out there who didn't "get" this movie. The entire movie is explicitly explained in the last few minutes. If you didn't get it, then just watch the last five minutes again, where the scriptwriter basically bashes you over the head with the answers to all the prior symbolism.

I was not disappointed by the ending; nor was I surprised.

Anyone who's read An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge or seen Lost Highway or Jacob's Ladder (two much better movies about this subject) will immediately recognize all the symbolic elements, see the "shocking" twist coming from miles away, and will feel somewhat cheated by the somewhat played-out script. I mean, really, once David Lynch weighs in on the topic, what more really needs be said? The biggest problem with this movie (besides the lack of originality) is that it both underestimated and overestimated its audience, at the same time. The geniuses were offended that it was so easy to see through, while the dummies (no offense intended) were offended that there was symbolism at all. And, of course, some people will always hate surrealism, calling it "cheap" or "it was all just a dream", when it's about exploring one's subconsciousness, not dreaming.

All in all, a rather nicely shot movie, but not nearly so beautiful, original, or revolutionary as the younger IMDb members would have you believe.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
don't believe it...
planetbprod28 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
First off, anyone that says this is an intelligent film and that you have to be smart to get it is only showing their ignorance. A third-grader could have figured out the end of this movie about half way through.

I have to agree with a previous comment by find-something: "The twist is just not tight enough. If you're going to write a story where ultimately nothing happens, then the twist better be brilliant, I mean perfect."

EXACTLY. There is no intellectual payoff in this movie. All style, no substance. Look at how many people like this "intelligent" movie... doesn't that tell you something? I know this probably sounds elitist or something, but I guess I just expect my art to actually try to say something. This is just a marginally smarter version of a Hollywood blockbuster -- great cinematography and effects, wonderful acting, clever writing (too clever, I'd say) -- but in the end, it just cops out and lets all the dramatic tension drift away into nothingness. A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
59 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Really good film
lilmiznetnerd12 June 2004
I too was part of a test audience for this film. I do agree with the last comment about the plot. The script was a little predictable and the one liners seemed a little corny at times.

The acting however, I thought was great. Ewan McGregor put in a marvelous performance, demonstrating that he is talented and can easily play a wide variety of roles. Naomi Watts, I think also put in a great performance.

Of course, I haven't as yet seen the fully edited theatre version, but so far I think it's a film that should definitely be seen.

A good film in all. 4/5
77 out of 157 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kind of Donnie Darko's Ladder
christianloteyro19 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
If you haven't watch this Film watch it. And if you haven't watch Donnie Darko and Jacob's Ladder watch them also.

This film will mess your head up and make you think what is really going on. I recommend it to those who seek Mysteries. The film is good and for me, I already watched Donnie Darko and Jacob's Ladder and my conclusion is it's kind of Like Donnie Darko's Twist with Jacob's Ladder's Story, with the Art Concept.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Prepare yourself for a slow-paced film....
muddychikk8 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
If you are planning to watch "Stay" be prepared for a very slow, twisted film. I believe that the movie honestly had potential, but overall attempted, without success, to be complex. The directing/filming techniques seemed very similar to Crash. I liked the film's image techniques, but the director tried too hard to be unique. At times, one may find it difficult to concentrate on what is happening during a scene. One may find that they are paying close attention to the camera angle instead of focusing on the actual story. However, if you are distracted from the story you really are not missing much. The basic story is as follows:

The movie begins with Henry (Gosling's character) entering the office of his psychiatrist. He is disappointed to find that his regular psychiatrist is out "sick" and finds a temporary replacement in her place (Sam). Sam becomes infatuated with Henry when on the day that they meet Henry somehow predicts a hail storm that actually occurs the very same day. The story continues (extremely slowly) with Henry revealing to Sam that he has plotted suicide to occur on his 21st birthday. He also reveals that he has killed his parents and cannot live with himself for that reason. In the sidelines, another story carries on about Sam and his girlfriend, Lila (Naomi Watts). It becomes known at some point during the film that Lila had attempted suicide, this being the reason for Sam meeting her. We also discover that Henry liked a waitress named Athena. How Athena ties into the mix comes in at the end. Her presence in the bulk of the movie was quite minimal and one never really knows much about her. Though the plot may seem interesting thus far, that is about as "complex" as it gets for a long while.

Now for the ending. Later on in the film, we discover that Henry has an infatuation with an artist that killed himself on the Brooklyn Bridge, on his 21st birthday, considering it a work of art. Henry plans to do the same thing, in the same location. Sam rushes out, trying to save his life but Henry tells Sam that it is simply too late to change his decision. In the end, the camera men do a terrific job at filming a car accident. This car accident happened in the exact spot where Henry killed himself. In turns out that Henry was driving the car that killed his parents and his girlfriend. (This explains why he told Sam that he killed his parents.) Henry dies on the bridge while Lila, the nurse, and Sam, a doctor, try to save his life.

Apparently, "Stay" for the most part was Henry's vision while he lay dying on the bridge. However, it was very hard to make that assumption based on the lack of information in the film. I came to the conclusion that the movie was based upon Henry's out of body experience before death by watching a section of the Special Features, and the details still lack an explanation.

Yes, "Stay" makes one think, but so did "Fight Club." The only difference between them is that "Stay" is composed of small details that cannot be evaluated.

My advice is as follows: Rent the movie. By all means, do not buy it. After you watch it, be sure to watch a little of the special features to make a better understanding of the film. I know that people have various opinions on things, and I have read some reviews that called people who dislike this movie "dimwitted." Well, for those of you who did like it, I will say this: I am glad that you were able to enjoy it. By no means am I saying "DO NOT WATCH THIS FILM!" and nor am I saying that it was great. I am telling you to watch it yourself and form your own opinion of it.

As for me, I thought it was compelling but remains without any explanation of minor details that I feel should have been in some way explained. The point of the movie was that the people who near death often experience things that cannot be explained. That is probably why the minor details were not explained, but unfortunately I observe this "point" with a lack of interest.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An underrated, clever film of 2005
rab6244221 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
For the few people that saw this film, it seems that people either love it or hate it, but that's the case with a lot of films these days. I thought the film was brilliant just because of how well thought out it was and it keeps you guessing till the end. Some movie goers aren't patient enough for a film like that.

A lot of the hits, at least in the states, lately are movies that don't require much thinking at all. They're just films that are entertainment and action alone.

Here's a brief explanation of the movie, if you don't want to know what happens, skip this paragraph. Henry Letham (Ryan Gosling) is driving a car with his girlfriend and family in it on some bridge (I forget which one it is) in the NYC area. An accident occurs and we see Henry between life and death while the other three people in the car have already died. The movie is then about what Henry is seeing as he's about to die. In the real world, Ewan Mcgregor's character Sam, and Lila (Naomi Watts) are helping him out until the paramedics can come and help. The movie we see is Henry's made up world containing Sam and Lila, where Sam is just helping a suicidal Henry and Lila is Sam's girlfriend. Other people he remembers seeing from the accident make short appearances in his made up world. Thus, the film is relatively confusing to some people, and I'm sure I haven't explained it as well as I could.

In the end, I say go rent this movie when it's avail
88 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Why don't you Staaay just a little bit longer
sol12185 April 2006
***SPOILERS*** Surviving a fiery car crash on the Brooklyn Bridge young 20 year-old art student Henry Letham, Ryan Gosling, goes to psychiatrist Sam Foster's, Ewan McGregor, office seeking help for the strange and weird experiences he's been going through since that accident.Not wanting to live anymore and face the thought that he was responsible for his parents death Henry tells Dr. Sam Foster that the following Saturday, his 21t birthday, at midnight he's going to kill himself. Sam had been through this before when his girlfriend Lila, Naomi Watts,tried to kill herself by slashing her wrists whom he saved in just the nick of time.

With Sam trying to get Henry committed over the weekend to keep him from killing himself he begins to suffer strange hallucinations as if he's being controlled by Henry and wonders if he, not Henry, is the one who needs psychiatric help. Things seem to be out of kilter for Sam as he starts to see people who are supposed to have recently died like, who Henry recognized, his dead father Leon, Bo Hoskins, and later Henry's dead mother, Kate Burton, and even his pet dog Olive.

It turns out that Sam and Henry are one and the same person with Lila unknowingly referring to him as Henry and the supposedly deceased Mrs. Lethman as her son Henry Lathman! Sam now trying to save himself as well as Henry backtracks in order to find all the people who knew and were involved with Henry as he starts to get the eerie feeling that he's somehow spiritual connected with his patient and that Henry's impending demise will also be his own.

The movie "Stay" has Sam going through a number of Daja-Vu and astral, as well as real world experiences.As he tries to prevent Henry from taking his life and at the same time finding out the dark secret in Henry's past that's driving him to do just that. You know almost right from the start that the Brooklyn Bridge is the center of gravity in both Henry's and Sam's mindless and almost irresistible rush to self-destruction. We see in a number of flash backs Henry with his girlfriend Athena, Elizabeth Reasen, and parents in a car driving through Brooklyn Heights to make their way, and fatal turn, on the world famous bridge; the best example of art in the 19th century as Henry put it.

A bit, if not very, confusing movie about life and death and how the world of the living and that of the dead sometimes interact with each other and even crosses over to give us a glimpse of what really is the difference, if there is one, between fantasy and reality when the physical and ethereal worlds suddenly collied with surprising and devastating results.
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Should I ... stay or should I ...
kosmasp19 April 2021
A quite famous song aside, this movie is quite wicked to say the least. It really needs your full concentration. You need to be there for the whole thing. You can't just watch this while doing something else. Although some might say it's the beginning and end that really matter (no pun intended) - if you miss what happens in between, you are missing out on the whole tale! The thing the director tried to tell you - to spin you right round with (I know another song, I thought while in Rome ..).

The actors involved are superb to say the least which makes me wonder how I never saw this before. It totally escaped me until the other day. I struggled with it too - but it was well worth it to say the least. I did have to check online if I was right with what I was thinking, even if I reckon it is quite obvious ... to a certain extent. Really a movie that messes with you and you may understand or empathize ... well hopefully you do! Cheap tricks and all included.
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
boring
antoniotierno9 March 2006
I continuously fell asleep while watching this movie. The actors performances are superb (on the other hand Naomi Watts and Ewan McGregor are a guarantee of success) but the viewer is supposed all the time to figure out what's happening. It's an experimental film putting the audience to the test all the time, a puzzle much more then a thriller motion picture. The plot (a shrink trying to prevent his patient from committing suicide) is not standard but not even unconventional, the setting, as well as the special effects, make the situations cryptic and weird. The problem is that many times things need to be deciphered.
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Lame, pale, boring psycho thriller/horror
simplius2 April 2006
Tedious, uninteresting pablum that was supposed to be mind-blowing, but fails miserably. After 10 minutes you notice there's something wrong with the rhythm of the directing; after 20 minutes you start both yawning and wondering what are the odds to blow it completely if you have a decent crew and a potentially good plot. The end of the movie is supposed to be explanation of the plot and the end of the suffering for the main character - but no, it is the end of the Chinese torture toward the watcher executed by an amateurish director.

And all of this is written by someone who has 'Jacob's Ladder' in his top ten list of movie masterpieces...
26 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant! Once again, another example of box office revenue meaning nothing
nickdove16 August 2006
As stated in the subject, this film is pure brilliance! The story is not completely original, it draws small inspirations from such films as "Identity", "Fight Club", "12 Monkeys" and even a little "Sixth Sense". But don't let that deter you if you did not care for those films! "Stay" is pure, cinematic genius from beginning to end.

Marc Forster is probably one of the greatest up-and-coming directors of our time. What he's done with this film will make any cinephile drool with delight. There are so many innovative camera techniques that your eyes experience a sensory overload of pure genius. One of these trademarks is a technique where he transitions from one setting to another while still making you think you're in the previous scene for a few seconds. For example, in a scene where we see Ewen McGregor's character in a shop, the camera then switches views to the glass door of the shop, which we see another important character looking through it. The door opens and the character walks through, at which point we realize he was going through a subway door in a totally different scene. Forster uses this technique, as well as many other amazing tricks, throughout, and it's no less brilliant every time we see it them.

As I said, the plot will remind you of a few other movies, yet the actual twisted ending, and the avenue which Forster and the writers take us there, is so completely different and interesting that this film simply must be seen.

McGregor did a fantastic job as psychiatrist Sam Foster, and Gosling was unbelievably realistic and convincing as the mentally unstable patient. Of special note is Bob Hoskin's almost cameo role as Foster's friend Leon. His character is so sympathetic and believable that it almost made me cry.

As usual with such films as last years "The Jacket", this movie was marketed as some supernatural horror film, but it's by no means a horror film. In fact I went into this movie dreading all the jump scenes and disturbing, weirdness that would make me run from my car to my front door at night, but really this is a straight up thriller in the vein of "12 Monkeys" and "Sixth Sense" (minus the ghostly appearances and dead people).

If you consider yourself someone who is tired of Hollywood's big-budget, slam-bang drivel and want to actually have your brain scrambling with thoughts throughout an entire film, RUN, do not walk, and see this film.
111 out of 153 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So bad that my brother is mad at me for choosing it
reamaboucharaf18 February 2021
This movie had a lot of potential but I wish I DIDNT STAY. My sister had the right idea in mind and walked out 30 minutes in. I lost all my credibility in movie picking for this one. Not worth the demotion. I gave it a 6 because after I Wikipedia'd it, I understood it better and also because I love Ryan Gosling.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unnecessary
mgd_m21 April 2019
Ok, what is totally absurd for 90 minutes becomes clear in the end. It's a coherent story, if nothing else. The problem with Stay is that it's just a huge trick that's revealed in the end. I mean, the whole movie is quite unnecessary, and there's no real plot. It's just a story devised to keep you guessing what's happening, and then when you get it, you say "Oh, fine, thanks". There's no real motive underneath, existential, moral, psychological or whatever, a reason-to-be such the one that inspired "Enemy" by Villeneuve, for example. Would I recommend Stay? No.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed