My review was written in April 1988 after watching the program on Karl/Lorimar video cassette.
This 1986 video cassette, geared to a magazine pictorial that year, is an extremely lowbrow effort unlikely to appease voyeurs or video fans looking for diversion. Its slack-jawed approach is disturbing in view of Playboy mag's original pretensions of intellectualism and class, as evidenced by the first film from the banner being Roman Polanski's "Macbeth".
Here David Kellogg tries to be cute, with all sorts of cartoons, pixilated "talking animals" and extremely boring dirty-joke storytellers padding the running time. Five Playboy models stgrip in farmland settings, though this material is highly suspect, when Linda Vittoria turns out to be another of the magazine's stereotyped narcissists, endlessly admiring herself in a mirror in various stages of undress.
Best, and wackiest, sequence comes when statuesque Jackie Lorenz gives whole new meaning to riding bareback.
Still photos from the magazine are displayed for several segments, apparently involving models who had only a still photography session with no live action footage. The results are unsatisfying.
This 1986 video cassette, geared to a magazine pictorial that year, is an extremely lowbrow effort unlikely to appease voyeurs or video fans looking for diversion. Its slack-jawed approach is disturbing in view of Playboy mag's original pretensions of intellectualism and class, as evidenced by the first film from the banner being Roman Polanski's "Macbeth".
Here David Kellogg tries to be cute, with all sorts of cartoons, pixilated "talking animals" and extremely boring dirty-joke storytellers padding the running time. Five Playboy models stgrip in farmland settings, though this material is highly suspect, when Linda Vittoria turns out to be another of the magazine's stereotyped narcissists, endlessly admiring herself in a mirror in various stages of undress.
Best, and wackiest, sequence comes when statuesque Jackie Lorenz gives whole new meaning to riding bareback.
Still photos from the magazine are displayed for several segments, apparently involving models who had only a still photography session with no live action footage. The results are unsatisfying.