First of all saying that this movie is porn is an insult, to the filmmakers, writers, actors and everyone that has seen this movie. I agree that the picture has lots of faults but the acting is not so bad, of course there are actors in this movie who cannot act, but Ciccia is in his usual good acting, Melania Urbina does a good job and also does Miguel Iza. I agree that the movie doesn't find itself, it drags a little bit, but it's not a bad movie, and it definitely is not a porn movie. The photography is not bad, the script has lots of problems because sometimes some of the scenes are completely incredible like the policemen never hit a shot to anyone. The casting although Ciccia is a very good actor, he was not the ideal candidate for the role, and Melania Urbina, although a good actress is burning herself because she appears in every movie like she's the only actress in the whole country.
2 Reviews
Doesn't know what it wants to be
SebaZava12 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, this movie confuses me. It tries to be intelligent, but it fails. It tries to have an interesting plot, but it also fails. The actors try to make a good job... but they also fail. There ARE redeeming aspects, but they are not good enough for the movie to be COMPLETELY good. What is this movie trying to be? A cops movie, a comedy or a porno? Wouldn't know.
The acting is sub-par. Giovanni Ciccia is acceptable as Django, but the other actors are almost completely awful. For example, Melania Urbina doesn't act, she just appears naked, simulates pleasure in a couple of erotic scenes, and says the lines she has to say - very plainly.
The movie overall looks kind of weird. Cinematography looks plain and there are no color variants or anything. It looks... TV-ish. No sets were used, I believe, meaning that all the sceneries are real, but they looks weird because of the bad cinematography.
In the end, I must say that the only way you could enjoy this movie is if you are looking for porn... that's all this movie is, cheap porn. It has more or less four or five sex scenes, and they are quite acceptable. But if you are looking for something more interesting or deep - namely good acting, interesting plot or cool characters - go see another movie.
The acting is sub-par. Giovanni Ciccia is acceptable as Django, but the other actors are almost completely awful. For example, Melania Urbina doesn't act, she just appears naked, simulates pleasure in a couple of erotic scenes, and says the lines she has to say - very plainly.
The movie overall looks kind of weird. Cinematography looks plain and there are no color variants or anything. It looks... TV-ish. No sets were used, I believe, meaning that all the sceneries are real, but they looks weird because of the bad cinematography.
In the end, I must say that the only way you could enjoy this movie is if you are looking for porn... that's all this movie is, cheap porn. It has more or less four or five sex scenes, and they are quite acceptable. But if you are looking for something more interesting or deep - namely good acting, interesting plot or cool characters - go see another movie.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
