(1961)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Balls Bluff was seen!
carl-3610 February 2006
I read the previous post where the writer said this film was "lost." I saw Balls Bluff at a Robert Downey (Sr) film festival (of sorts) in 1965. It was at a small theater near Ghirardeli Square in San Francisco. I seem to remember seeing it again, maybe in 1969, about the time Putney Swope came out. Balls Bluff has always stuck with me, especially the part where the civil war soldier walks out into right field (as I recall)at Yankee Stadium. I remember reading somewhere that Downey had his actor walk out there during a game and shot the scene from the stands. The man was merely escorted off the field. Can you imagine what they would do to him today?

Anyway, I mention this in the hopes that it might help someone locate a print of this movie. I remember liking it and have always wanted to see it again --
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No Balls, no Bluff: this film is lost.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre24 April 2004
"Balls Bluff" is a low-budget, amateur short film that merits a small footnote in film history as the first movie written and directed by Robert Downey, Senior. No prints of this movie are known to exist.

I have often maintained that no movie should be considered 'lost' unless it was deliberately destroyed. Many, many films that were officially 'lost forever' have been rediscovered by diligent searchers. In fact, just last week (as I write this), BBC World Service announced the discovery of a complete print of 'Beyond the Rocks', a silent film directed by the very underrated Sam Wood (apparently not one of his best efforts, but any Sam Wood movie is worthy of attention). So, 'Balls Bluff' may yet turn up.

But this seems unlikely. When a lost film is rediscovered, it's usually because at least one release print was never returned to the distributor, and the errant print is found in a private collection or archive. 'Balls Bluff' was never released or distributed in the first place, so it's highly unlikely that a print will turn up in a forgotten projection booth.

I have not seen 'Balls Bluff', which probably no longer exists. My review of this film is based on information given to me by two friends of mine: Fred von Bernewitz (who edited 'Balls Bluff' but no longer owns a print) and the late Art d'Lugoff, an impresario who once screened 'Balls Bluff' in his jazz club in Greenwich Village, NYC. Fred von Bernewitz originally distinguished himself in the 1950s as the compiler of a checklist of art and articles in 'Mad' magazine. At the time that I write this, Fred von Bernewitz now has a very respectable career as an audio editor.

'Balls Bluff' is unofficially based on 'An End to Bugling', a novel by Edmund G Love, who is better known for writing the book that became the Broadway musical 'Subways Are for Sleeping'. EG Love was a journalist who, as a publicity stunt, once ate his way through 5,000 New York City restaurants ... in alphabetical order of the restaurants' names! 'An End to Bugling' is his novel about a Confederate Army regiment at the battle of Gettysburg in 1863 who, due to a glitch in Heaven, are sent forward in time to Gettysburg, PA exactly one century later. (This novel was still being written by EG Love at the time when Downey borrowed its premise for 'Balls Bluff'.)

'Balls Bluff' is the story of one Union Army soldier (played by director/scripter Downey) who abruptly finds himself snatched from a Civil War battlefield in 1861 and catapulted 100 years into the future, to Central Park in New York City. Of course, he sees cars and other strange objects. He sees a newspaper headline about Vice President Johnson and he assumes this refers to Andrew Johnson, not Lyndon. He tells a modern onlooker that he's "a Union man", and of course this is misinterpreted as a reference to trade unions. Eventually, the soldier learns that the Yankees (baseball team) are in the Bronx today, so he heads north (geddit?) to rejoin his regiment. Get it? Yankees? Union Army? Civil War? Bring the jubilee...

As 'Balls Bluff' was a very short film, made on a negligible budget, it was probably intended as Downey's 'demo' film to get him professional assignments ... and on that level, it certainly succeeded, as Downey went on to a very notable career. By all accounts, 'Balls Bluff' wasn't very clever or funny, but (with its short running time and shorter budget) it didn't really have a chance to do those things. As I've not actually seen 'Bulls Bluff', I shan't rate it.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed