Megiddo: The Omega Code 2 (2001) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
121 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
A Valiant Attempt, But Not Exactly Successful
emverano29 October 2001
Films released by church-based organizations rarely succeed, but TBN, a group which calls itself a Christian organization, has been trying hard recently in releasing some Apocalypse-based movies. This organization may deserve some compliment for its efforts.

In spite of my compliment for their effort, I still think that TBN's recently released film "Megiddo" (2001) is enjoyable but rather shallow and cartoonish. The film's numerous special effects and computer-generated animations, which are reminiscent of images in John Milton's "Paradise Lost," does not remedy the film's cartoonish nature. The film does not have the necessary artistic depth because of several reasons. One of the reasons is the comic book-like simplistic character development of various characters (especially Stone Alexander). But the fundamental flaw of this movie is its lack of exploration of the real nature and danger of the devil. I am not a theology expert, but I was told by priests and ministers that the devil is so dangerous because it attacks our mind and soul, not using scary monsters or modern arsenal of top-notch weapons, but using evil spiritual powers. I was told that the devil is not just a cartoonish monster portrayed in this film. It is so dangerous because it is a supernatural being with no physical form to be destroyed (or confined underground like the devil in this film). Fiery special effects cannot fully portray the devil's work because the devil's battleground is our soul and mind, which are very difficult places to be portrayed cinematically. Even though it shares some of the imageries with this film, "Paradise Lost" is an artistic accomplishment far superior to this movie because Milton successfully described in psychological and philosophical detail how the devil attacks our soul.

This film tried to depict the struggle between God and the devil and the Biblical Armageddon with numerous fireworks and computer-generated animations. However, "Megiddo," the end product, merely looked like a super-charged version of Marvel Comics or Arnold Schwarznegger action films. The struggle between God's army and the devil's army, as described in the Bible and in literary works like `Paradise Lost,' is a battle which may occur--or may have occurred in the past or may be occurring at this very moment--in the spirit world, a dimension totally distinct from our physical universe. The nature of this struggle may be far beyond the power of human perception and comprehension. The struggle may not follow the laws of physics. How can a movie director depict such a struggle even with the help of computer animation and expensive special effects? What the director is doing is to cinematically depict a struggle which may not be able to be captured on film.

Other than the film's fundamental difficulty of trying to cinematically capture the struggle in the spirit world, the film's script has many flaws which make no sense whatsoever. For example, when the FBI came to arrest President David Alexander, why was the president protected by only four or five Secret Service agents? I have seen President George H. Bush in San Jose, California and recall that he was protected by dozens if not hundreds of Secret Service agents. Also, at the end of the film, why did Chancellor Stone Alexander invite many of the world leaders to come to Megiddo with their tanks, jet fighters and infantrymen? I do not understand the practical need to indulge in such an expensive undertaking. Maybe he just wanted to enjoy the sight of all those tanks and jets assembled in one place. But wasn't he too old to play soldier? Moving so many men and equipment costs outrageous amount of money. If he wanted to meet all the world leaders, the chancellor could have simply asked them to come to Megiddo without their tanks and jet fighters. Lastly, why would an intelligent man like President David Alexander think that he could single-handedly penetrate the defense perimeters of the enemy's armed camp and assassinate the enemy's commander-in-chief (i.e. his own brother)? Every intelligent human being knows that armed camps are heavily guarded around the clock by numerous sentries. Maybe President Alexander is really an accomplished ninja! There are numerous other flaws in the script which make no sense. All these logical inconsistencies contribute to the film's comic book-like nature.

Moreover, I was disturbed by the film's right-wing isolationist message. The film's depiction of the United Nations and European Union as nests of the devil reminded me of Bible-inspired paranoid conspiracy theories voiced by some American right-wing groups. By depicting the rest of the world as demon-controlled, is TBN advocating the takeover of the United States by right-wing groups who call themselves `Christians?'

I do not think that this film was very successful in portraying the Biblical Armageddon. Cinematic portrayal of such an immense, supernatural struggle is an impossibly difficult project which may never be successful. Nevertheless, I still would like to compliment the director and producer of this movie for their valiant attempt.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great actors somewhat carry story
knutsenfam25 August 2005
This is a mediocre film with a somewhat confused script, but good to great actors still make it worth a watch. If nothing else, it's great to hear Michael York read the ancient texts. He also injected some great Shakespearian quotes. Also, R. Lee Ermey is a great Marine "tough guy" President.

This film promotes some views that are not politically fashionable (i.e. a concept that a highly popular yet evil world leader will charm and manipulate the world, and the concept that the US should govern itself).

Some people are "shocked, shocked to learn that gambling" excuse me, to learn that a film actually markets some political and/or religious viewpoints in its story.

How naiive! Many films today market some kind of political and/or social agenda, but if their views are politically fashionable then few complain.

But just maybe someone will get curious and read the Bible books of Revelation (and Daniel) for him or herself.

Remember that Hitler and Stalin and Lenin (to name the top evil but charming dictators of the 20th Century) had charm for their followers...An Antichrist would certainly be a larger, more powerful type...waiting to charm us all.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Most Commercial Christian Film Ever
maloned28 September 2001
I don't want to be another Christian that just writes good things about a Christian film because it's Christian. I want to give my honest opinion. In the past TBN and the Christian market has made some really bad films, and it should be said, even by Christians. Why? Because the consumer should decide what is good or bad, and as Christians we should demand good Christian films and not just be satisfied that there are Christian films in theaters, whether they are good or bad. We have to remember that these films will represent our faith and will be seen by non-christians. In my opinion God deserves the best, and if we want these films to witness to the public they most compete with the quality of secular films. The only way that we're going to see good quality Christian films is if we the Christian public demand it and not support bad Christian films. I know that we should support our fellow Christians, but not films that are going to mis-represent our faith. I feel that Left Behind and the first Omega Code were pretty bad movies. I took a non-Christian friend who's a big movie buff to see the first Omega Code and I felt that I had to apologize for the film.

With that out of the way, and after upsetting most other Christians that will read this, I have to say something positive. Megiddo was to my suprised and delight a good film. It was very commercial and main stream. By far it has the best dialog of all Christian films, something that past Christian films have lacked in. The actual film quality is much better and the effects were decent, the film doesn't look like video lit for a newscast. It still is in need of a better score. But with all that it is very commercial. Mind you that I went in expecting the worst and came out very satisfied and with a new hope and expectation that future Christian films will continue to improve and appeal to the main stream and secular market which should be the focus of these films.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty good for a movie trying to sell prophecy to the mainstream audience...
DScottHewittEMTB2 October 2002
Taking into account it is very hard to sum up prophecies that cover decades of end time into 90 minutes or so, the movie is very well done. Excellent performance by all the key actors. The battle scenes at Megiddo look like the movie came from one of the top regular studios. Could it have been done better? Yes. Could it have been done better at this length? That would be harder.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad I couldn't even laugh at it
amidalasky4 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I admit, I have a strange fondness for bad movies. Movies that are enjoyably bad, or movies that really aren't as bad as the critics/public insisted, though they're certainly not good.

However, there are some movies so irredeemably, stupefyingly, unimaginably bad that they don't even have the semi-out of being funny. "Megiddo" is one such movie.

I sat through it because I was bored and it was an exceedingly dismal night for TV. And even though I didn't pay to see it, I still want my money back. What a turkey.

The plot, if you can call it that, is a mishmash of rah-rah super-patriotism, shockingly blatant racism and xenophobia, paranoia, pseudo-Biblical gibberish, "Omen" ripoffs, "X-Files" ripoffs, "Exorcist" ripoffs, a pitiful love triangle, hideous acting, even more hideous dialog, and cut-rate special effects that offer a silly Satan who's about as frightening as a pair of bunny slippers -- as well as being shockingly stupid. I guess I'm just used to the idea of the devil being brilliant, but still...you'd think that old Scratch would at least be clever enough to deduce that one of his "allies," reluctant to start with, is going to back-stab him.

All this talk about Beelzebub, and no mention of the actor who plays him. It's Michael York, hammier than a pig farm. Many an actor has said that they prefer to play villains, as they're more fun than heroes, so you'd think that York would be having a blast playing the ultimate villain. However, his performance seems to strain him as much as it does the audience. Just like his computer-animated counterpart, who shows up at the very end, he isn't scary. He's just peevish and annoying.

Poor Michael Biehn (who hasn't aged well at all -- he used to be so cute) is stuck playing the good guy, York's "brother." I use quotes because I think that that the devil actually inhabits York's character when he's a child and uses him as a puppet, though I'm not sure...the movie is muddy on this point, as on so many others. Anyway, Biehn's performance mainly consists of looking constipated, barking out painfully stupid dialog, and clenching his jaw...perhaps to keep from dissolving into gales of laughter at the sheer absurdity of all that is going on around him. I suppose it is to his credit that he doesn't, in fact, collapse in hilarity; he must take his craft seriously, even when applying it to something this appalling.
21 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Thespian restraint thrown to the winds
bkoganbing5 December 2018
Michael York must have laughed all the way to the bank on this one and this presumes his check cleared from Paul Crouch. He gives one of the most outrageous performances ever put on film. Acting classes in overacting can be built around what he does with Stone Alexander the anti-Christ he portrays.

Megiddo: The Omega Code 2 gives us a bit of back story of Stone Alexander who as we saw in the first Omega Code was checked in his march to the apocalypse by Casper Van Dien. Van Dien was smart enough to stay clear of the sequel.

We get a bit of back story on Stone. He was the oldest of two sons of media mogul David Hedison, the other Michael Biehn. Biehn gets to be president of the USA and York the head of the world. As we know York is also the devil's spawn.

This film is bad, really bad. It's a compilation of all the nostrums of the end timers, the xenophobic nationalists, and general all around religious kooks. And believe me York knows this, but this is an opportunity to throw thespian restraint thrown to the winds.

Michael York is having a ball with this part. As Charles Laughton said 'they can't censor the gleam in my eye' and no one would try with York.

One of the worst of the end time films. But a chance to see this kind of overacting doesn't come that often.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite possibly the worst motion picture in history.
robert-259-2895416 January 2013
This piece of cinematic excrement deserves it's own place in, pardon the expression, Hell. It was as though they—the deluded producers—dug up every burned out, over the hill, out of work actor in the Screen Actors Guild and bribed them with hard, cold cash to star in this monumental turkey. I just watched this piece of junk on one of those Born Again Christian networks, and I'm quite sure that whoever put this waste of time on the air will also be sharing a special place in the Netherworld for their crimes. Michael York, usually a class act in everything he's worked in apparently wanted to know what it was like to star in a porno film with his clothes on. He was about as convincing in the Satan role as Billy Graham playing John Holmes. The fact that he actually was a co-producer of this crap gave credence to the cold truth that just because you can act doesn't mean you can produce a decent motion picture. What a monumental embarrassment this must have been to the veteran thespian. And Michael Biehn, who probably hasn't worked since The Terminator, didn't stand a chance. Even the action sequences, which should have saved this piece of junk fell as flat as the rest of this epic waste of money, mind, and manpower. The stunts, consisting mainly of uniformed soldiers flying through the air like Superman on crack, seemed to be produced by school boys who just ditched school to participate in this eye sore. If you find many of the fairy tales depicted in The Holy Bible to be extremely hard for an intelligent adult to believe, wait until you feast your weary eyes on this tale of superstitious nonsense! This big budget cartoon, instead of "saving souls," will no doubt have fence sitters staying away from churches in droves. You've been warned.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Interesting waste of time
kebman7 December 2003
Warning: Spoilers
This is what I would call a promising manuscript still in the condition to be molded into something good, that unfortunately turned into half hearted muck. What could have been, `just ain't!' So I'd love to direct this film, and here's a few things I would have changed.

The acting is done with way too much bravado. Was the direction `act like you're all priests?' Very Shakesperian, but not at all suited for the Silver Screen. Maybe this could have been solved on a very early stage in the magical process called casting. Alright, I'll give the actors credit for being professionals (as in doing it for money), but great acting doesn't come by it self. It has to be inspired - most likely from someone or something; usually the director or the manuscript - or a large paycheck. So this would have to be mended; possibly by toning down the sneering and illusions of grandeur.

Then there are simple things like military uniforms that look completely ridiculous (red pyjamas, need I say more?). Well, I'd certainly change that to something better suited for real combat. After all, soldiers of today don't march on line into combat. They sneak trough grass, jungles and puddles of mud and water, and thus need something else than glossy parade uniforms.

Alright, I know the battles of the Armageddon are supposed to be chaotic, but in this film every fight scene defies what most people know about simple logical behaviour during a conflict. Even though most people haven't been to the army, they know from watching the daily news that military conflicts just aren't fought the way this film wants us to think. There was talk of some tactical maneuvering in the film, but I certainly never saw it. The only thing I did see was a lot of uninspired shooting in all directions, and it went on and on and on. There's simply no development. All the excitement of a raging battle is gone. It's not seeing hundreds of explosions that thrill, but someone trying to break trough, and maybe failing - or someone trying to get into position for a good shot, and making it or not. That's exciting! Not mindless shooting followed by even more mindless explosions.

POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD: Then there are the small things like the President of the USA personally going into battle. The word I'm now looking for begins with an 'r' and end with 'idiculous!' However, there was one particular air war scene that caught my eye in which they fly over the battlefield and down with a jet. It's all glorious CGI of course, and the only combat scene I'd keep. Just about the only cool scene in the entire film, so it's worth a meriting mention.

OK, I can live with that the Devil corrupts the EU, and thus come into conflict with the USA. Though it would have been a far more interesting film with the USA as the Evil Empire. I mean, how's that for a nice twist! In fact I think that's far more likely, since the EU largely drowns in its own bureaucracy, while the USA is largely lead by one single man. It's also very interesting in the perspective that the world mostly knows the USA to be a bastion of democracy and good (of course disregarding the Vietnam war, The Iran/Contras scandal, Watergate, the death penalty, racial segregation until the 60's and not to mention Bill Clinton's marital vows).

Unfortunately there is sort of an unwritten rule that you can't criticise the American government in a film - well, not unless you're foreign or named Oliver Stone, anyway. So maybe that's one of the things I would have to forego. There's also the question of ratings. Many hardcore patriots might fall off, and you don't want that. Then again, there are patriots of the American government, and patriots of the American way. Two slightly different things, if you ask me (the latter being the better, since governments are much easier to corrupt).

POSSIBLE SPOILER: Further more, all the mayhem suddenly stops as an act of God dawns on the battle. It sort of works like the proverbial cavalry coming to the rescue of mankind. It's all very biblical, but it completely robs the victory from the films true hero - especially since there is given no presupposition to this event. It simply happens, without any apparent cause. Yes yes, God's our only true hero and all that, but it's simply not who the film calls us to relate to. There would have to be a different solution in where our hero wins with God by his side, instead of this great wonder. Or there could be a condition our hero had to meet in order to make this wonder happen, but there is simply no such thing in this film. I mean, what's the point of fighting so hard to win, if God's going to come to the rescue with a big wonder of all wonders anyway?

I would also tone down the childhood of The Dark Ruler, 'cause we all know he's bad, don't we? There's no need to waste time telling it in so many details, all though the `torching the baby scene' was quite cool. There's simply too much talk in the beginning. If I wanted to see a play, I'd go to the theatre. Get on with it! Further more, the Devil without disguise looks like my uncle Bark. Ugly, but not scary. I would be looking for someone more like the Balrog of LOTR for this role.

There are of course many more things to pick on, but this will have to do for now. So if I got the chance to make this film, I would not only do it better, but I'd even do it with a smaller budget. Because only a few small steps would have made this film much better. It's just sad it turned out so bad.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
TBN ruins the book of Revelation
djansen246 November 2011
Terrible piece of work! A film that wanted to make a big statement about parts of end times prophecy and just turned out pop trash. What a pity! There are some good actors who must have received poor direction. It is such a waste to see Michael York sputtering out melodramatic monologues where subdued performing would have been better. And Michael Beihn being our patriotic hero and "savior"...he must be looking back at this film and shaking his head in embarrassment. Udo Kier also gets lost in this mess. Poor direction, overacting, a patchwork of CGI and stock footage makes up the world chaos and battle scenes. But what really kills this production is the story. The book of Revelations has made good fodder for pop Christian end times stories. But please, making the US of all countries the leader of the coalition against the devil? All the patriotic and faith prayers of the US president? As a Christian, I was offended by the whole thing. If they were making a pure piece of fiction, it would have been low grade fare to start with. But TBN at the production helm implies they meant it to be a serious drama about what end times would actually look like. And the results are laughable. Read the book of Revelation yourself and be challenged and blessed. Don't waste your time on this lousy film.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly much better than the first.
Boba_Fett113824 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this movie expecting to see an even worse movie than "The Omega Code", of which this movie is a sequel. "The Omega Code" was really one of the worst movies I've ever seen. I don't even remember what it was about, or what happened in it. It was that forgettable and bad. Not bad in a funny- or cheesy campy kind of way, it was just plain bad. I was surprised- and have to admit that "Megiddo: The Omega Code 2" is a far better movie, that at least entertains, although it obviously also is far from a brilliant- or must-see movie.

The movie didn't really began well. The movie seemed like an huge "The Omen" rip-off and just literally used that movie its main premise. A child who turns out to be the devil himself, the child who kills his own father by throwing him of the balcony, the devil going to military school and wants to take over the world through his political power, Armageddon and even the town of Megiddo plays a prominent role. They only changed a couple of minor things to avoid being called a total "The Omen" rip-off but the resemblances are still too obvious all to consider this movie an original one. The movie in the beginning also dragged on for too long and the story flow was poor. Really were all those sequences of the devil at military school and his childhood really necessary for the story? But when things and the story are finally starting to take shape and Michael York and Michael Biehn become the real main characters, the movie turns into a pretty descent thriller about the world's Apocalypse.

Sure, it's far from credible all and the movie features a bit too many implausibilities and other silly moments. such as all the references to the German-Nazi regime were too overdone all. It's getting a bit tiresome and cheap, all those movies falling back on that time period. but by thriller standards this movie really isn't a bad one. The Christianity themes only get a bit annoying and too overdone toward the end of the movie. I remember that the first movie was much worse and annoying when it came down to the religious undertone of the whole movie.

The Apocalypse is of course movie-wise a pretty interesting concept to use. The movie handles the concept well. It takes its time to build up and shape things. It builds up to the movie its spectacular climax, in which some of the worlds biggest superpowers (Americans, Chinese, the World Union, which is the army of Satan/Stone Alexander on Earth) clash. It results in an huge and surprisingly good looking climatic battle.

Michael York obviously seemed to be enjoying himself playing in this movie as the bad guy for a change. Michael Biehn is also good for most part, although he is far from believable when he acts as and becomes the president of the United States. The movie also further more features R. Lee Ermey, Guy Siner and Udo Kier in some good and smaller roles.

The movie is a mixed bag when it comes down to its visual looking. Obviously this is no big-budget movie and that shows in its sets, action sequences and special effects. Yet at the same time the movie also has some impressive and good looking effects as well. It makes the movie look unbalanced. At the one moment laughable at the other impressive. The same goes for its story and the movie in general actually; laughable at times but at others impressive. It doesn't make "Megiddo: The Omega Code 2" the most consistent, or most watchable movie around.

Definitely better than the first, so I can recommend this movie, also since this movie can also be viewed apart as a standalone movie. But the whole subject is still handled better in the Omen movies, for if you're interested in it.

6/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible movie
aplato30 November 2001
I keep getting suckered into watching these horrible Christian movies. I was tortured by Omega Code, and this one is no better.

Basically, if you're a Christian and need propaganda to feel good, you will love this movie. It is full of Christ-affirming propaganda.

If on the other hand you have an actual appreciation for good cinema, this is a horrible, horrrible movie. Apart from the illogical plot and pathetic effects, Michael Beihn and Michale York must really be starving for money. Neither of these guys is a bad actor, but their performance in this movie is truly awful. I got the sinking feeling half way through that neither of them really wanted to do this movie, but because TBN shook enough money in their face, they took it.

Save your money. Go to church. Avoid this low-rent crap.
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Entertaining, fun and over-the-top...
jazzingitup22 April 2002
I really enjoyed this film despite hearing all the negative comments going into it. I found that although the film doesn't cling to 100 % accuracy regarding biblical facts that it still delivers the point in a meaningful way.

I found the casting very good. I have always liked Michael York and Michael Biehn is always solid. The production values were very good for not being a $100 million film and I especially enjoyed the helicopter night raid. The special effects were pretty good all around and the pace of the film was very brisk.

The films strongest asset is the fact that it makes you really look at world events in the context of biblical prophecy. There is obviously a lot of stuff going on in the world that makes you think about it even more after seeing a film like this.

Overall, a very good film that surprised me and that definitely does not deserve the severe pasting some individuals have given it.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A powerful movie
Melissa Alice15 April 2002
This movie was very riveting and intense. I thought the actors were all very good and natural, although I might agree that sometimes it was a little over-acted (though I didn't think of that while I was watching it). The graphics are great--the best I've seen yet in Christian movies, and good even compared to Hollywood movies, for the most part. It did not really have a gospel message and was not even a very Biblically accurate portrayal, but since I believe there will be a 7-year tribulation, it is something to think about. I watched it with some family and friends, and we all thought it was a powerful, well-made movie, although we didn't think the message was that clear.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible, not terrifying
Rachael-Siobhan27 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
So tonight I watched this movie for a lack of alternative evening endeavours or bearable programmes; more out of sheer boredom, to be honest. Wile my boredom wouldn't fade away - and I was waiting for that to happen, as I expected this to be an action inspired movie about the end of times, particularly given the cast -, this most terrible movie gradually turned most hilarious.

The acting is over the top as if even the actors couldn't take this effort seriously, the special effects remind me of late 90s CGI as one would find it in the animated sequences of role-playing adventure games, and the director obviously has never heard about dramatisation or narration. Suspending disbelief won't help you with this movie; the great arc of the Book of Revelations has been rendered a mess; and the Antichrist is about as terrifying as Tinky-Winky, the teletubby. That means you won't find anything frightening about him at all, and moreover he is neither a deceitful nor evil nor smart, just a hoax of devil.

The love story is soddingly dry, and while there is emphasis, there is little empathy. I was hoping that somewhere, somehow, by God's intervention perhaps, suspense would emerge in this movie; but the final scenes just stayed as uninspired as the rest of the film. The end felt particularly like a cop-out - a sudden intervention by God, that and who never was indicated before, a classic deus ex machina, that was no salvation, just dodgy mechanics - and BOOM! the movie's over.

There is no doubt that this film had an enormous budget; it's sad to see that this was used to no avail. Well, that's not true: It shows a hideous mixture of hooray patriotism (US), xenophobia and prejudice (towards UN and EU) and a caricature of Christianity, i.e. an appalling lack of understanding about anything as regards the nature of politics, religion or faith.

In the end this movie was just so bad, that it was most hilarious to watch the actors (and CGI characters) stumble from one mess into another. I asked myself for whom but fundamentalist Christians such pretense of film had been produced - I did so jokingly, and it amazes me, shocks me, that this audience really accepts such sorry waste of time. This film is not worth your time, rather read in the Revelations.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining yet literal
rreid-123 September 2001
My wife suggested we see "Megiddo," and I'm glad she did. It's refreshingly different and indeed entertaining to watch a film lacking the ubiquitous dark-green haze of linguistic pollution or the hackneyed writer's block cure-all: nudity.

Entertaining though it was, "Megiddo" represents interpretations of the endtimes described in the biblical Book of Revelations or Apocalypse that are current among many of us. Might there be other interpretations that a film should consider as well that go beyond the strictly literal? Perhaps that is too much to ask of one film, given the circumstances of its production.

Humanity's struggle between good and evil was a thematic constant in this film, as in Judaism's Yom Kippur, Christianity's atonement, Islam's only now barely understood jihad (the struggle over the sinful self to be one with God's will). For all its literal stance, the film is poignantly significant given the recent horror (that humankind is wont to visit upon its own) in New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, and in other stricken areas world-wide.

See "Megiddo" (and read the book, or read the book first) and judge for yourself. Are the endtimes the stuff of spectacular special effects (some quite profoundly moving as was God's parting of the Red Sea in "The Ten Commandments"), or is the Holy Bible's text possessed of far more subtlety and significance than we think or films display?
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Hooo boy...
Catracho022711 March 2022
Um....wow...more from Trinity "Entertainment". Another garbage bag of idiotic ideas to make the feeble minded watch in awe as the world "destroys" itself according to their evangelical idiot plots. My wife and I watched these back to back and it was like, "Wait, did you put the wrong one back on", "No, it's supposed to be the sequel", "But didn't we already see that?", "Well, I think the beginning here was supposed to be first, then the first hour of the other should be spliced after the start, then part of the midd...", well, you get the point...bad movie, bad movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst so called christian movie ever made!
jarmlar3 November 2003
What a waste of time. After this movie I realized that it was the Faith Movements TBN productions that stand behind this film. I have found out after reading some "heavy" stuff, that the Faith Movement is really wolves in sheep clothes when it comes to the different christian groups and churches. In this movie you will clearly see that: 1. They don't even mention the name of Jesus Christ in the entire movie, they call Him the nazaren. 2. The focus is set on Satan and not Jesus Christ our Saviour. 3. It's a miracle if somebody receives Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour after watching this movie. 4. When the Anti-christ brother, David Alexander, comes into this church in the town, every people thinks he is the messiah and they come to him and ask him to save them. 5. This movie have much plot holes, and things that don't match with The Word of God. This is just a few points of many, that I could mention, that makes this film too bad. Watch out for these TBN productions. I've watched "Carman: The Champion" and it disapointed me too, when people call it a christian film. Watch the "Left Behind" movies instead or the "Apocalypse" movies. They are much better. This movie doesn't deserve more that 1 out of 10.
16 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad, bad, bad...
thehardyboyz204322 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
(A few spoilers below)

While '99's "The Omega Code" was no great feat, it was at least entertaining to a point. "Megiddo," the prequel and sequel to "Omega Code" is just a bad piece of film-making, the story (which covers a lot of ground in the first 30 mins.) is a shoddy mess of politics and pointless action sequences, with nothing that really ties them together, except towards the end, but even that doesn't make too much sense (you'll see what I mean if you see it, perish the thought, mind you).

I didn't know what was going on during a good 99% of the film's running time. It didn't really matter I guess, since no one else in the audience seemed interested at all.

Watch for some uproariously bad shootouts and some ridiculous war battles that made me want to reach for a Playstation controller (then I realized it was just a bad effects and not a video game).

Michael Biehn (whose career has hit rock bottom with this tripe) plays the brother of Michael York (a disturbing idea in it's own right) who battles York, who is trying to create a unified nation consisting of all the nations of the world. But of course anyone who saw the first one will know this is just a cover for his real plan, (which I won't say because it's too hokey). Biehn is in truly bad form, and the whole religious theme gets clouded over by the loud, pointless and horrible edited action sequences.

This was just a major mess of a movie, with hilariously bad over-acting, silly special effects and a lame story, which all make this the worst film of this year, bar none. -**** stars.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very funny in unintended ways
helge-fauskanger27 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Michael Biehn fighting the Antichrist! Remember 1984's The Terminator, where Mike was content with fighting a time-traveling killer robot with an Austrian accent? That plot of that movie seems SO much more plausible and realistic now that I've spent a very funny afternoon watching 'Omega Code 2'! Indeed, it was so funny that I had to write my first IMDb review ever!

But what can I say that that other reviewers haven't said before? Here we truly have it all – a ludicrous ultra-Bible-literalist end-time scenario, unabashed American jingoism, patricide, a pathetic love triangle, cheesy CGI, and even lazy historical errors (the ignorant scriptwriters have Stone 'Satan' Alexander accepting a post in the European Union in 1976, a full seventeen years before the union even existed!)

We follow Damien ... er, Stone from his childhood, when he is duly possessed by Satan and spends the rest of the movie (d)evolving into the Antichrist, the world dictator who finally establishes that perpetual dread of right-wing conspiracy theorists: The One World Government! Brrr! Luckily, the President of the 'God-blessed United States of America' (sic!) refuses to go along with the plan. Not-so-luckily, Stone quickly disposes of him with a supernaturally induced heart attack.

Still, this allows Vice President Biehn to assume full authority, and a lot of screen time is wasted on setting him up as the great hero who will save the day in the end. You can call this a spoiler if you must: The time is indeed wasted, for ultimately Biehn's character does NOTHING of any significance! He is last seen staring stupidly into the sky when Armageddon comes and the 'Nazarene' abysses Stone-gone-silly-CGI-Satan. (Yes, we're talking horns and leathery wings here!)

A devil so incompetent that he avails himself of the hammy Antichrist seen in this movie does deserve to lose the eschatological battle. In the off-chance that the fundamentalists are on to something, I would expect the real deal to be slightly more subtle than standing before thousands of people and declaring something to the effect: "Ahh-y am your GOD!!! Worship ME!"

Three stars, every single one of them for unintended comedic value.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst movie I've ever seen
JaydoDre9 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
No, seriously, I know how many common people will tend to use an unprofessional "the worst" or "the best" when reviewing something. I never exaggerate like that, but in this case I can really not find a movie in my memory that I've seen that was worse than this one. I can't stop from using the unprofessional "I" perspective either, since this special movies requires a special kind of review. I could try an list all the negative things about the movie here, but the thought of me having to think about this movie for that long makes me reach for the gun. So let's be brief.

Megiddo seems to be a home-made attempt by some 60-year-old Christian conservative to create a patriotic movie. Although the concept itself might discourage masses to see this thing, the movie even fails to be what it's supposed to...miserably.

The plot is basically this: Europe and the neighbors become united under the command of the devil, who plans to take over the world. God showers the Earth with rocks while the US stands alone against the world with its super-president dressed in black leading the fight against the devil. Does that make sense? If it does (and you are as messed up as I thought), it's where the sense ends. The details of the storyline are much more appalling.

Actor choice wasn't bad. Michael York does his work as the bad guy, but in all his demonic power, he can't save this flick. The rest of the actors are just trying to make long working hours, and York isn't innocent of that either.

Special effects and camera work are surprisingly good at times, and absolutely TERRIBLE the rest of the time. It's as if the effects were done by two different teams.

I wish to speak of this no longer and I will try to pray away the shame and sin of having seen this movie, although after seeing it, the devil and God suddenly don't seem as cool, powerful or scary anymore. I beg you to never go and see this movie unless you're loaded on painkillers or like to practice masochism.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Christian enough!
statoil24 July 2002
I watched Megiddo out of curiosity. It seemed interesting especially me being a catholic. I thought that it'll be a piture of what the armageddon would be. I expected to be terrified, terrified that I would change my current indifferent attitude towards the religion my parents chose for me when I was born. Well... If the end of days is going to be something like THAT then I better look out for a trying hard, pychotic-who-wants-to-own-everything kind of guy and make sure that in order to be saved, I won't believe in him.

The movie is entertaining but it is not seriously depicting the content of the bible. The movie just literally translated what is written. It's the type of movie I would use to scare children to eat their vegetables and not to promote world peace.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Razzie Award nominee: Worst picture of the year
ryangilmer00723 September 2001
What greater praise can I bestoy on a picture than to say-- "Battlefield Earth was better, much better"

Megiddo: The Omega Code 2, fails horribly on many levels. Some are technical, some are plot wise, and many come back to the general lack that these filmmakers have in cinematic movie making.

8Xentertainment has released a decent movie before ("Carman: The Champion"), so I was surprised, but here goes--

Errors, in movie making: first off, this movie needs to ask itself, "What am I?". Am I a sequel, a prequel, a both, a set up for a holy trilogy??? Going into the movie I thought it was a prequel. The movie poster itself says it is a sequel, and the movie itself never references The Omega Code at all. The title is simply "Meggido" (so technically neither).

Casper Van Diem: huh he is actually in the movie??? the movie jumps so much in the first 40 minutes, that we go from a voice over about the dawn of time and then about the time of Jesus, then different people discussing Richard Nixon, Gunsmoke, and JFK, to a fire, to a militare school in early years, to fighting over girlfriends, to graduation, to patricide, to european union (in the early 1990's???-um error???).

This is the first mess that is the 40 minutes or so of this trash.

Basically, the movie is hard to follow (its a prequel for parts, but then its a sequel. Where the heck is the original The Omega Code then?? paste them together, so we can actually remember/notice Van Diem in this movie and , OH YEAH,, so that the movie will actually make sense) If you even follow the movie to this point (we are apparently in a sequel, so please remember those subtle plot points from 2 years ago), the world is now at war with an E.U. leader, but they don't know it (this is so, Left Behind, Apocalypse, Tribulation, Retribution).

Please, if you want a "christian" movie go see those (Apocalypse being the one to skip). Heck, if you want any wakup movie on the topic, see those. DONT SEE "MEGGIDO".

The world at war, had a separate battle between brothers and demonic spirits.

Again, please go see a different movie (The Omen, Damien:Omen II, The Final Conflict:Omen III, and Omen IV:The Awakening are much better).

The rest of the movie is no more original.

Basically, Meggido is an unoriginal ripe off that spans 40 years in 40 minutes, has stupid acting/speaches, and cannot be classified as anything related to the original. Cameo appearences that could be fun, make no sense, and the ending can only be a sequel....

The search for the next Worst picture Razzie award need look no farther.

Even Michael Beihn cannot save this dud.

Meggido is a definite loser of a movie, but its my Razzie winner.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
MEGIDDO SCORES BIG!
Wheres_George24 September 2001
You've got to see this film, the true nature of the demonic is revealed and how it ultimately bows down to the the wrath of God. Based on the book of Revelation, this movie is based around the anti-christ and his rise to power. Good vs. evil abound as the battle of Armaggedon takes place at 'Megiddo.' Stunning special effects are in this movie which is a drastic leap from Independant film makers. The acting is much better than in the original 'Omega Code' and the budget was more than twice that amount. It shows as this movie really took me by surprise. The film turned out a good number even though the 314 debuting theater screens was not enough to punch it into the box office top ten. Definitely worth checking out.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Somewhat better than first Omega Code...does make you THINK!
movie-viking15 February 2011
Of course, this movie gets some EXTRA nasty reviews from persons who despise its message (drawn on the amazing Books of Revelation---& Daniel)!

And some who are believers are uneasy with some of the movie's premises...and with some plot holes...

Yet... thought "Megiddo..." was somewhat better at showing us how this evil Leader is formed...(Stone Alexander played by Michael York).

We all should be giving our kids ideas of what NOT to value in a National or even World Leader. you might use these films to teach students or grade school or older kids to avoid "Dictators who Charm the Populace & then DEvastate Them!" .

And if Alexander seems a bit over the top...just watch some old Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin footage.

If you are a believer (or are curious)...check out the Biblical books of Revelation & Daniel...they describe the earth's end. Not easy to understand...but amazing reading.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An atrocious mess that doesn't deserve to be under the guise of a mainstream film!!
mindset2116 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
This is a truly awful movie.

It actually makes box-office bombs like "Wing Commander" and "The Postman" look like undisputed masterpieces.

Positive elements: about 2 special effects in the film look almost respectable; Michael York, as always, brings utter believability to, alas, banal dialogue.

Negative elements: Hmmm... Where to begin? The plot is plain stupid, the writing is pathetic and most of the special effect's look like they were made on someones home computer. Also, there are other problems with the film. For some reason, TBN has always had this strange love for putting the devil in their media. Just watch one of their music videos, TV shows or other material put out by them. The devil is always either made fun of, or praised up until the very end. (Spoiler Warning [minor]) In this film it is even more disturbing than that--- he takes communion and speaks the words Jesus spoke. Someone please point out to me where in the Revelation it is said that the devil takes communion.

Bottom line: Avoid at all costs. Don't watch it even if the DVD is in a free bin.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed