100 Centre Street (TV Series 2001–2002) Poster

(2001–2002)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
I miss this show!!
Denise_Harrison23 March 2004
I envy you folks in Australia getting to spend time with the fantastic characters in this show. When it went off the air here in the U.S., it absolutely broke my heart. I had come to care about so many of the characters and loved the time that was spent getting to know them. It is one of the few shows that actually let people talk...

It reminded me of European films, and even television, that delve deep into characters and themes and don't feel pressured to bang out action sequences for the A.D.D generation.

I so hope Mr. Lumet gives us more of exactly what this was -- one of the best dramas on television, ever. Lumet really amazes me.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hey Netflix or somebody, you need this dvd in your inventory!
cetaylor315 January 2023
This was a thoroughly engaging series that I would love to see again with my husband who never saw it. How did this get so buried? The performances and plotlines were exceptionally realistic at the time but I'm quite sure it would seem as relevant today as it did then.

How come Australia has managed a dvd with their system that's incompatible here and the U. S. can't come up with one? What sort of proprietary nonsense is making this unavailable?

I'm now understanding frustrations i've read by other posters about why there's a minimum character limit in order to post. If anybody's ever read my reviews, they'd know i have no problem writing reviews that expound at length, but for commenting on a series I saw 20+years ago, your inexplicable minimum character count just leads to this babble.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
NYC 400 - #333 - "100 Centre Street"
DeanNYC30 April 2024
The justice system in our country is getting a pretty thorough examination in 2024, and the methods by which the scales tip for every citizen of the country that faces the law, is a topic of discussion among everybody at the time of New York's 400th anniversary year.

The address that serves as the title of this program, houses the Supreme Court and the main Criminal Court for the city and state of New York, one of a complex of courts and legal offices in Lower Manhattan.

We can't even start to talk about this series without noting that it was created by Sidney Lumet. Lumet's career seemed centered on New York from the very beginning. Starting as an actor in stage plays, Mr. Lumet then transitioned to film, becoming a writer and director and continually trying to capture the flavor and the facts of The City in every production he was involved with.

This was Mr. Lumet's attempt to give a true picture of Criminal Court in NYC, the people who work there and the people who come through the system. Lumet either directed or wrote the bulk of the episodes for the series.

Alan Arkin was Judge Joe Rifkind (with focus on those last four letters) - a kind and fair judge, not willing to overtly punish those that really don't deserve it. He had homespun wisdom, stories about his family, observations on NYC changes through his life and how that informed his rulings from the bench. He continually saw the good in people.

Paula Davicq was Assistant District Attorney Cynthia Bennington, continually locking horns with another judge in the courts, Attalah "Atilla the Hun" Sims, played by LaTanya Richardson. Their constant battles are the friction of non-fiction. If you were facing charges, you absolutely wanted to wind up in Judge Rifkind's, NOT Judge Sims' courtroom.

The balance of storylines and characters is what was so compelling about the program. These were characters that had depth, a backstory, personal lives and interests that related to who they were and what they did, and that is always a great way of hooking an audience, helping them care about those people. But the overarching element was the court itself, the cases and how the staff dealt with the docket. Is now a good time to mention that Margo Martindale turns up as a regular in this series? She was also an important cog in 334's "A Gifted Man."

New York played a part because nobody knew NYC like Sidney Lumet - his understanding of the geography and the economy, the various crimes that were likely to occur, the people doing them, the circumstances that created the need for justice and the humanity of treating people with respect and kindness was second to none. Apologies to Dick Wolf! And a lot of the time we were on the streets, witnesses to the events that brought these suspects into the titular building.

I have to think that if this show had aired on a major network and not basic cable A&E (which, I checked just now, and yes! The network still exists!) this might have had a longer run. There wasn't nearly enough promotion for the series, not nearly enough focus on the elements that might have attracted an audience and A&E chose to run the show at, of all times, Saturday Nights at 10pm ET! That's hardly fair for this kind of gritty, realistic show about crime and punishment and the New York people involved.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A rare series.
MEG-4010 January 2003
Not that many people will be reading my comments as this show is a couple of years old now but we are seeing it for the first time in Australia and I must comment on the grittiness and unglamourous world of the arraignment courts in the USA. We are bombarded with lawyer and police shows with beautiful people who are, oh, so smart and unbelievable! Yet, 100 Centre Street works because it does not glamourise itself and the stories and actors are all believable. The few episodes we have seen so far, only about 4 or 5, have all been outstanding and I, for one, am looking forward to seeing more. Superb, this is a 10/10 for anyone who wants to see the 'other side' of life!
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sadly missed, where is the DVD
bustopher16 March 2012
Unfortunately the first reviewer (prak8221) is symptomatic of why this show was axed. I can't believe that anyone apart from the most puerile would think Law and Order was actually better than 100 Centre Street, but alas, L&A is still running whereas 100 Centre Street is not...

I found the stories absolutely gripping; Alan Arkin totally enchanting, and the whole show a work of art, aimed at the intellectual. It's such a pity that shows aimed at people like us, just don't rate well - although AMC has done Mad Men and Breaking Bad, and (is it?) HBO with The Sopranos.

We got 100 Centre Street over here as a treat from the good old Australian Broadcasting Corporation (gov't run institution known as Aunty). They also gave us Breaking Bad, and the SBS (another gov't run broadcaster) gave us Mad Men. If it was up to the commercial networks, I guess this sort of stuff would never see the light of day.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Gritty, hard-edged, one disturbing scene I recall
safenoe8 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I remember 100 Centre Street and it as the antithesis of Law and Order (which was a fine series may I say). I'd say in 100 Centre Street, not all the good guys win, but sometimes the bad guys do, and I guess that's life.

100 Centre Street was gritty, hard-edged and somewhat fatalistic, and whilst it pre-dated the OJ Simpson trial of the century by about 5 years, it was prescient in many ways.

One scene though did disturb me I'm afraid and it speaks subtle volumes about racial casting and depictions in the USA. It was where an African-American got into a violent altercation with a Chinese- American at his takeaway store. The store owner got knocked out unconscious and the culprit poured boiling oil in the store owner...how gruesome. A moment later the culprit screamed understandably.

I don't know if the culprit was ever caught but what was in the writers' mindset when crafting this scene? Why not feature an Italian-American whose faced is covered with a pizza? Or a Greek- American whose faced is smothered with souvlaki? Or a Scottish- American whose faced is stuff with Big Macs?

Also I wonder if the takeaway store owner got casting credit in the episode?
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An exceptionally uncommon admirable jewel in American TV drama
brubie-124 January 2004
I know this is a late comment, but we in Australia are just viewing this unique American series. Firstly, I would like to thank Mr Lumet, for such a rarity in American TV. Normally what we, non-American audiences, are subject to what is the common formulised-to-the-max drama with each episode inevitably concluding with a win for the "good guys/gals". I simply am bored, no a little angry, with all these trite and over-glamourised TV dramas. I refuse to watch shows like Law and Order and other similar shows because they follow the same, thoughtless formulas which are normally so predictable, it really isn't worth my time while depicting a warped view of human societies.

In Australia we are showing it on our national TV broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Commission, similar to the American Public Broadcasting System without the ads. This means, naturally, the audience is rather limited here which is, for me, a great shame. For if more non-Australians watched this insightful and mature drama where ordinary people are depicted as close as ordinary people are, they would get to know how flawed the most powerful country in human history is for those for lack the finance for the basic decencies of human needs, like sufficient nutrition, decent shelter, equal rights under the law, humane social welfare system, etc etc - and all this in a country which boasts the greatest number of billionaires on the planet. I cannot praise Alan Alder's acting enough though the rest of the cast deserve equal praise. But it is in the very conception and the great writing which has never faulted in its depiction of a courtroom environment that deserve the greatest praise.

I would imagine that a television drama which gives equal depiction to story and character would not be easy to sell to American and thus overseas networks. Whatever, it makes for compelling and intelligent television - a rarity from American networks.

It is such a shame that it doesn't have a wider audience.

Thank you.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another better show killed
grauwulf243 April 2005
100 Center St was a great show. Another of many (Boomtown is another) killed because it wasn't dumb enough, not of the formulae of the moment, and not immediately "hot", and therefore no immediate financial gratification or foreseeable success to the unimaginative producers or networks. It was gritty and sometimes controversial. It had the misfortune of being on a small unsure network that could not/would not afford longterm investment.

Alan Arkin, who plays a judge, was and is an American acting gem. Lumet's concept and writing was real, smart, painful, revelatory, and ultimately satisfying as great tragedies are. Overall the ensemble was a delight and made us want to know how they and stories would develop or cope with their many very real challenges - challenges that were common to many of us, and not the extremes shown on 'Law & Order' or 'House'...

(100 Center St is the real address of the downtown NYC courthouse. The show followed the working and personal lives of the judges, prosecutors, and defenders and the struggles between law, justice, politics, true care, and personal ambition or desire around this common case inner-city court.)
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant
callingbrian17 November 2007
This was a series that ran something less than two full seasons. I'm not sure all the episodes listed actually ran.

It had an unusually large and diversified cast, headed by Academy Award winning actor Alan Arkin and the magnificent LaTanya Richardson as diametrically opposed, both judicially and politically, but sill close, New York City judges.

It seems to me producer Lumet sought to bring back some of the quality that occasionally surfaced in the early days of live TV drama. I think he succeeded brilliantly. While the series slightly lost focus in its' second season, due mainly to cast defections and resulting plot line changes, it was, IMHO, head and shoulders above most of what passes for dramatic TV these days.

It is always a joy to see artists the likes of Arkin, Richardson, et al, applying their craft in an obviously friendly environment.

So far as I know, this two season series is not available on DVD. It should be.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Real Life New York Court Drama
cbgb29 January 2002
"100 Center Street" is the single best show on television. This underrated, incredibly written drama far outweighs any courtroom competition. I have been a casting director for over ten years and I have never seen a cast put together that is so wonderful. Watch this damn show!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good writing, gritty style
coprogirl20 January 2001
I like this gritty, well written drama. Good acting, realistic stories. I just have one complaint: The story line involving the brouhaha over judge Alan Arkin releasing the young kid who subsequently killed a young cop seemed a little disingenuous, since the kid was before the judge for jumping a turnstile in the subway. No mention of any violent crime. No one could have forseen that the kid would have committed a violent crime. Except for that one point, this looks like a terrific show. Hope to see it on A&E
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A great show - the cast, cases, sets, even the music was great!
doreen9075512 April 2003
I miss this show. Every episode was like a feature film. Real quality work. It was treated poorly by the network that aired it. Word of mouth can go only so far. It should've been advertised more. Alan Arkin was so perfect in his role . I have added this to my journal of "The Graveyard of Great Shows"
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sidney Lumet is back in top form.
kenfoto16 January 2001
Sidney Lumet is back in top form, doing what he does best. Driven equally by character and plot, an intelligent look at the difficulty of sometimes making choices between loyalty and morality.

Beautifully acted and written. The characters are realistically imperfect human beings in an imperfect world.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
true to life, I worked there !!
chillydrew16 January 2001
I worked there in night court in the 70s as a court officer for nearly 4 years & as a court clerk in the 80s, then worked as a law clerk and ADA. This show has some great story lines & very realistic situations. From the career prosecutors to the epileptic hooker to the drag queens to the wall street yuppie drug addict to Forlini's restaurant to the "turn 'em loose Bruce Wright" type character portrayed by Alan Arkin, it was very entertaining. I must admit that I had forgotten how truly depressing it was to work there at night. sidney lumet has done it again. I can't wait to see the next episode.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's good to be real
shellybbad11 February 2002
Wow, I was shocked to read some of the negative comments about this show.

Something I have always hated about "Hollywood" is that any project is much more salable if it closes on an upbeat or has a "lived happily ever after" ending. Being real isn't always part of the criteria, substance much less important than if it looks good and is well polished.

Unfortunately, I have experienced first hand the very popular belief about a shows potential and it's success being not based on it's subject, content and the real often twisted nuances of life. Rather it seems to have more emphasis on whether or not that it is slick, highly promoted and has a good score, if it does then it must be good, it must be okay... (Now don't get me wrong, while I do have a special appreciation for the Mike Post's and Pete Carpenter's of the business, I find their contributions to be an added bonus to the production but not a critical must.)

And I just wanted to say that it's not all good, it's not always okay...

I think the point that Mr. Lumet is trying to make is that life sometimes is tedious, stereotypical and tarnished. Often the bottom line, end of story and/or real deal in life is that it doesn't always have a happy ending.

It accurately illustrates that sometimes more often than not, life is just not fair or even good and the outcome in general really does suck.

Honestly tells us a story about the human condition - the gist being you get sick, you get old and you die, and with this you make the best of it otherwise you don't.

100 Centre Street does just that and it is what I love about the show the most, it's simple approach to complicated issues, people and scenarios that are sometimes raw, sensitive and rude. Just puts it out there, like it or not, without all the extra bullsh... This I understand and appreciate very much... I do because I have lived it and know it all too well...

THE END

in love & light, shell

PS - Mr Lumet, if you read this, boy have I got a story for you... LOL
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
BORING! Too formulaic!
josephcj24 January 2001
The dedicated lawyer who wants to stay in the D.A.'s office to make a difference. The rich girl turned lawyer who wants to prove herself and not rely on daddy. The budding romance between the two. The family problem that forces the dedicated lawyer to make hard decisions. The liberal judge and conservative judge (race of each is incidental) The bad decision by the judge (either judge; interchangeable) that causes terrible consequences. All in the first episode.

Gee, Mr. Lumet, how original... YAWN!
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
100 Centre Shee-it
prak7882110 November 2001
The commercial says: "After some nights, it gets to you".. yeah right..

It didn't get to me and I am not watching it again. Can't believe A and E renewed this crap. It should not be allowed outside of the likes of the USA Network.

This show eats dirt when compared to Law and Order. Where Law and Order is a tightly-written and expertly-edited show, this show is an unrealistic softcore soap opera that is filled with stereotypes and formulaic trivialties. Heck..it is even apparent in the theme music: Law and Order has the guitar-driven funky and energetic score and this one has the whiny trumpets and sax (Yuck).

Just because they throw in a couple of court scenes with some legalistic dialogue doesn't make it a good serious show.

So what if Sidney Lumet was behind it. Am I supposed to kneel down and like it anyway? Bah..

I can just FEEL the inferiority complexes of the writers and the director from the way they do the characters. Alan Arkin trying to be the worldly "been there and done that" OLD judge, the nice BLACK woman with good advice for everybody, the main female character who is RICH girl falling in love with a lower class ITALIAN guy.

Then there are the supporting hispanic characters who in one scene are SERIOUS lawyers but in the next scene become drug snorting sex-loving office SLUTS. (They obviously did this to provide the titillating sexual action without having to make the main characters be the "bad boy or bad girl".) Then there is the guy who is totally career-focussed but can still manage to be a sexual stud with a feminine side. Gosh I could go on and on..

Nothing original. The plot is slow-moving, inconsistent and dull. The episodes meander all over the map without any continuity in character or story. They wasted like 10 minutes in one episode showing a bedroom scene. The gratuitous swearing is only added so that the bored audience will sit up and take notice. Gritty.. my a$$.

The bottomline is that after watching this show, I don't come away feeling satisfied and happy. I also do not find the characters and story believable from my point of view. So, this show failed for me.

Too bad.. back to the reruns of Law and Order...
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed