Santa Claus (1898) Poster

(1898)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Very nice for 1898
planktonrules10 February 2019
When you look at films from before the 20th century or so, you need to keep them in context to properly enjoy them. First, most all films of the time were less than two minutes long (like this one). Second, a traditional style narrative was unusual...often the films just shows snippets of everyday events. But in "Santa Claus", the filmmakers have done something different...they have a fictionalized story AND it's pretty charming...albeit short.

The story begins with a servant putting two kids to bed. Soon, Santa arrives and he's holding a small Christmas tree. He enters the kids' room, deposits small toys in their stockings and simply disappears.

In 1898, Santa was not the ever-present symbol he later became and Santa's look wasn't so codified. This one looks a bit more like Father Christmas but nevertheless, you will recognize him and what is happening. Rather sweet and charming despite its brevity.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
One of the earliest Christmas movies
Horst_In_Translation13 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Possibly the earliest? In any case, it's the earliest I've seen. The kids are taken to bed, they hang out their stockings and Santa arrives through the snowy landscape while they're deep asleep and fills their stocking with candy. Unfortunately the film ends before we see the joy and delight in the brother's and sister's eyes the next morning. It's certainly one of the best films for children of its era and it's even worth showing it to your little ones today. An interesting fact about it is also the idea in people's minds back then that even the Christmas tree is brought by Santa, a truly uncommon approach today. However, my favorite part had nothing to do with the holiday feeling it delivers. It was the way the moment the mother switched off the light and how our perception of the room is changed by the director at this exact moment. Excellent display of fade to darkness and a short film I'd easily recommend to people all ages, especially those who are about to get into the silent film genre. A very entertaining minute.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cinema's first X-mas (web)
leplatypus10 September 2016
In 1898, the cinema is still a baby and it seems it's happy to play with its first gifts: the special effects! Back then, it was a true art that asked for inspiration, craft and intelligence! A bit like a Lynch's movie, here we got vision, mysterious drape and a fantasy character! But don't be afraid, as written in the title (again an innovation), it's only our dear good and friendly Santa!

Thus, this time, it's an English movie as it was then mostly AngloSaxon culture! It's great to see how the home were furnished: the chimney was used to heat but only in upper classes buildings!

Finally, the camera is still motionless and like the future security one, shots what happens in front of....
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superimposed Visions
Cineanalyst2 March 2008
George Albert Smith was one of early cinema's most important pioneers; he was, perhaps, even more innovative than his more acclaimed contemporaries, namely, Edwin Porter and Georges Méliès. He is surely less popular because he didn't create as elaborate of story films, but he did pioneer many narrative techniques and opened up new possibilities for the art form. In 1898, the year of this picture, fiction films were still in their infancy. "Santa Claus" involves a one-minute, single-scene story of Santa Claus visiting two children as they sleep. Yet, this was the normal length and narrative simplicity of early fiction films, and Smith's presentation of this story was innovative.

One point of interest of this film is the appearance of Santa Claus, although he had already appeared in previous films. Additionally, seasonally-timed releases began early in film history, and Smith having made this film in September (see "The Beginning of the Cinema in England" by John Barnes) would have allowed exhibitors time to purchase it for the Christmas season. By the end of the 19th Century, Christmas had essentially become the holiday that we know today, including some of the commercialism. American cartoonist Thomas Nast had already transformed the image of Santa Claus. In England, however, this film has a rather thin Santa with a loose robe. Nevertheless, he's readily recognized, and the story follows Santa entering a home through the chimney and delivering presents to children as they sleep.

Another interesting aspect of this film is it's the earliest one I've seen or heard of which includes its title within the film--lettered at the beginning, as is the case with most movies since. In the beginning, films didn't include their own titles within the picture, but catalogues would list the titles of the films and exhibitors would often either create their own title card slides or have a lecturer inform audiences verbally of the titles of films. Later, in such films as "The House That Jack Built" (1900) and "Dorothy's Dream" (1903), Smith pioneered the use of intertitles.

Most interesting, however, is Smith's use of then novel trick effects to present the film's narrative. Smith stopped the camera to cover the set in black drapes to represent darkness after the nurse turns off the lights for the children to sleep. Although it's obvious today that drapes cover the stage, it was a creative effect then, especially since the black background was needed for the following multiple exposure photography, which is the film's most brilliant aspect.

Somewhere from around July to October of 1898, Smith made at least six films that employed the multiple exposure, or superimpositions, trick. It's somewhat unclear whether Smith or Georges Méliès introduced this technique to motion pictures. Smith tried to patent the application of it to motion pictures, but that was frivolous since it was already in use in still photography. The earliest film that I know of to use superimpositions is Méliès's "The Cabinet of Mephistopheles" (Le Cebinet de Méphistophélès) (1897), which appears to now be lost. The uncertainty is somewhat moot, however, given that Méliès and Smith are known to have had discussions around the time of these inventions, and both filmmakers were leaders in exploring the possibilities of the art form.

As in Méliès's film, Smith used double exposure for ghostly images, but in others, such as "Santa Claus", he masked the camera lens for a circular vignette of the secondary image within the original scene. Smith seems historically uncontested in having introduced masking to cinema. Before entering the business of film production, Smith was a magic lantern lecturer, and the vignette scene-within-a-scene images on magic lantern slides were surely his inspiration for these films. In addition to "Santa Claus", Smith created a scene-within-a-scene as a vision presented by a supernatural being in "The Corsican Brothers", "Cinderella" and 'Faust and Mephistopheles'. "Santa Claus" seems to be the only one of these multiple-exposure experiments from 1898 that still exists today (outside of a few stills). Additionally, the "vision" in "Santa Claus" is somewhat different from those described in his other films.

The film allows for some interpretation of its vision, too. On one hand, the trick allows for the presentation of parallel action without crosscutting between shots, which probably makes this the earliest instance in film history of showing two simultaneous actions of differing locations (the children in bed and Santa Claus on the rooftop). In later films, such as Méliès's "Le Voyage dans la lune" (1902) and Porter's films "Life of an American Fireman" and "The Great Train Robbery" (both 1903), filmmakers used temporal repetition to present parallel action, or to show events from different perspectives. The earliest instances of crosscutting between shots that I've heard of began with Vitagraph and Pathé productions around 1906.

On the other hand, the vision and Santa Claus may be the children's dream. The catalogue description provided by Barnes supports this interpretation, as it describes the effect as a "dream-vision". Additionally, Santa Claus doesn't appear until the children appear asleep. This is, again, probably a first in film history. Porter used the same technique in "Life of an American Fireman", and other filmmakers soon used the multiple-exposure technique, if not a similar circular mask, for dreams and other visions. The earliest matte shots, such as in "The Great Train Robbery", too, I believe, used masking.

I prefer to consider the vision both a dream and an instance of parallel action, and it's certainly an instance of parallel action whether or not it's a dream. Both of these elements would introduce new dimensions to cinema. Shortly after this film, Smith introduced the representation of dreams in separate scenes in "Le Me Dream Again" (1900). He was a remarkable filmmaker.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cute Li'l Yuletide Charmer from Long Ago
Screen_O_Genic25 December 2019
Santa brings a pack of goodies to the little kiddos and all are delighted in the holiday of the year. Admirable special effects for the time and the sheer vintage quality of the film offer undeniable appeal in this minute-sized glimpse from the distant past.

Merry Christmas to all. :-)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
19th Century Santa
utgard1425 September 2017
British short film made near the end of the 19th century. Which is very cool to me, by the way, watching something made before my great-grandparents were born. It's a little over a minute long and basically just shows Santa Claus visiting a house on Christmas Eve. Interesting for historical reasons, both for film history and Christmas/Santa history. It's hard to rate a thing like this. For the most part, when I rate a movie or short or TV show, I tend to rate it on a technical level compared to similar pieces of its time or before. I also consider historical importance but ultimately entertainment value trumps all for me. This entertained me as much as a minute and change short from 1898 possibly could, and it has some technical prowess for the time on display. So that's where I'm coming from rating this as high as I did. Others will rate it higher but I just couldn't and I felt like rating it lower would be unfair.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Evolution
boblipton13 December 2007
Although D.W. Griffith is usually honored as the inventor of modern film grammar, most of the groundwork was laid down a decade earlier by George Smith of England. This is one of his early films.

But even this particular Athena did not spring fully born from the mind of Zeus, and we can see that Smith is using a lot of magic lantern grammar -- the children dream of Santa and he appears in a small circular image in the upper right corner, straight out of the preceding technology's grammar. This particular technique would not vanish for another decade and a half -- and arguably is still in occasional use in such peculiarities as SHERLOCK JUNIOR and its successor THE PURPLE ROSE OF CAIRO as well as Jeunet's UN LONG DIMANCHE DE FIANCAILLES.

Another point of interest is the title of this movie. Although Clement Clarke Moore's poem, 'A Visit from Saint Nick' was well known and popular, it's a Dutch and New York and hence American phenomenon. What was an Englishman, with their Father Christmas, doing playing with the idea? It seems to me that Smith may have been a far more important figure in popular culture than even I thought.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Fascinating Glimpse Of 19th Century Film-Making
sddavis6329 December 2008
This interesting look at a vision of Santa Claus from the late nineteenth century is notable for a number of reasons. First is obviously its age. I think it's the first piece of movie-making from the nineteenth century that I've ever seen, and the quality and clarity was quite surprising, given that age. There's some decent enough use of special effects (extremely primitive by today's standards, but surprisingly effective when placed in their historical context.) The image of Santa Claus gives us a bit of a picture of how the jolly old man has evolved over the years. In this vignette, he has the traditional white beard but his clothing appears to be more of a robe than a suit, and he's very thin compared to the image of Santa we have today. In a little over a minute, filmmaker G.A. Smith was able to tell us the story of a Christmas Eve when two young children are put to bed. It seems to me that the first appearance of Santa is meant to be a dream that the children are having, as Santa appears hovering over them in the corner of the screen. As the children dream of Santa, he then comes through the darkness and into their bedroom to leave them with candy. It's really a delightful little film, fascinating from a historical point of view. I find it difficult to rate, because I really have nothing to compare it to from that era, but I'd say somewhere around 8/10 seems right.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice Film with a Different Looking Santa
Michael_Elliott14 December 2010
Santa Claus (1898)

*** (out of 4)

This early British film is one of the first to show Santa Claus. The film is pretty simple as a couple kids want to stay up to see Santa but their mom makes them go to bed. We then see how Santa gets into their room without waking them up. This film runs 75-seconds so naturally one shouldn't expect a full story but it's interesting to note that they were at least trying to tell something and this is a full five years before THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY. What's interesting when viewing this film today is the look of Santa as they have him a lot thinner than we are use to see and he's also wearing more of a robe than an actual suit. The special effects used in the film are certainly primitive if you compare them to the stuff of today but for 1898 they're actually pretty good. I thought the effect of the mother turning the light off was something incredibly simple but the visual of it was terrific.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Designing the grammar of cinema
p_radulescu27 August 2010
Is it magic lantern or already a movie in its own rights? I would say it's still in between: the children are dreaming of Santa Claus, he's making his appearance in some kind of nineteenth century UFO in the upper corner of the screen, then by some magic he enters the room. Still thin, not the fat guy of today's commercials, still dressed in a robe, no boots, no trousers; definitely the Santa of our great-great-grandfathers' dreams.

This movie proves the genius of George Albert Smith: he was still in transition toward the cinematic specific, while resolutely designing the grammar of the new art.

Well, this is fine, but the question remains: this apparition of Santa, is it a dream, or a parallel action? You know, that's with the great movies: they have open endings, leaving the outcome for us.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
That's one old Santa
ericstevenson26 June 2023
So, this was one of the first ever short films that had an actual story with it. I was surprised to find out that it didn't even have music! Talk about a silent film! I still very much appreciated it for what it was. When we see the light being turned off, it's obvious they just put a black curtain over everything. You can tell they used camera tricks to get Santa to disappear.

This wasn't made by George Melies or Louis Feuillade. This proceeds even them! The plot is that Santa is giving kid's Christmas gifts and that's about it. Honestly, if it was this easy to do, you can see how Santa does it all in one night! Then again, we have gotten more gifts over time. They should have remade this for 1998. ***1/2.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the atmosphere
Kirpianuscus4 June 2020
A precise sketch about Christmas Eve. Innovative, giving the feeling to see a full - length film , proposing the fair story, in right manner. Short, good chance to discover the art of George Albert Smith . And great recreation of atmosphere in one minute film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The first holiday movie?
Tornado_Sam6 October 2017
You can't call this early Smith films' special effects outstanding for the time period, considering that exact same year Georges Melies made a film called "The Four Troublesome Heads" which has even more creative camera tricks. In terms of plot, however, this is pretty sophisticated considering most films at the time were plot-less and merely documented everyday life. In fact, considering its Christmas-y theme, you could call this the first holiday movie. I can imagine children being delighted back in 1898, and it's still a charming little gem even now.

Some children want to stay up on Christmas Eve but a maid tucks them into bed. By the clever use of a matte shot, we see Santa go down the chimney. He then enters the room and fills the children's stockings, disappears, and the children wake up. That's all there is in this movie but you have to admit for 1898 it's really quite good compared to other movies of the era.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed