Five Fingers of Steel (1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
The curtain starts to come down on the golden age of martial arts movies
ckormos14 February 2017
It begins with uninvited guests at a wedding destroying the place. The bride and groom's family are too polite to stop the bullies but they manage to slug a few at the end. This escalates quickly and the bad guys set up the escort company to be robbed of their consignment. The frame up is so beyond reasonable doubt but the bad guys come out on top.

In 1982 the curtain was coming down on the golden age of martial arts movies. Everything that was possible to do in this genre had been done to death. This movie takes a story line and characters that have been done dozens of times and does it again with nothing different at all. Hwang Jang-Lee playing a good guy instead of a white eyebrows villain is the only morsel of creativity in this movie. Watching this movie to say you have seen all of Hwang Jang-Lee's movies is really the only reason to watch it once.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It has its faults, but more than not this is fairly well done and pretty fun!
I_Ailurophile31 March 2024
True, it's not as if even the most celebrated, iconic names in Hong Kong cinema are perfect. The likes of Golden Harvest, and the Shaw Brothers, handily earned their reputation for martial arts flicks, but not all their works are equal. It's also true, though, that any like-minded fare from other purveyors is far less certain to measure up to our standards, and I think it's safe to say that we see some common weaknesses in this 80s feature. The editing, cinematography, and direction may raise a skeptical eyebrow at points in terms of the fundamental orchestration of shots and scenes, and sequencing; it may well be that the acting is also variable in quality. The writing can be less sure-footed still, struggling to effectively communicate the narrative (and establish characters and their relationships); if we're unfortunate enough to be watching a version with a dubbed language track, the overlaid voice acting ranges from mediocre to terrible. Suffice to say that whatever else is true, 'Five fingers of steel' isn't a premier exemplar of the kung fu film.

However, while this specific picture is troubled with some issues, including extra grainy image quality and sometimes muddled audio, as far as I'm concerned the fact also remains that it's noticeably stronger than some of its brethren. The voice acting isn't great, being less than ideally varied, dynamic, and emotive, but I've definitely heard much worse. Despite imperfect sound, I quite like the dramatic score we're provided, and the sound effects aren't outrageously exaggerated and cartoonish as in some other titles. The stunts, fight choreography, effects, and otherwise action sequences, broadly the top highlight in the genre, are all splendid, and do not suffer from choices of editing or camerawork that would uselessly chop them up. Some small instances in the writing are more flawed than others, including some decided directness, and in execution some moments don't come off as well, even if it's just a matter of being too drawn out. Nevertheless, happily this is surely an example of a martial arts movie that does a fairly good job of communicating its story, and it's one that goes a bit surprisingly dark at times. The plot is nothing ground-breaking in its transplanted echoes off the U. S. western, but it's solid, and that's more than I can say for some kindred works. Factor in excellent filming locations, sets, costume design, hair, makeup, props, weapons, and so on, and there is more strength than not here.

I think what it comes down to is that while 'Five fingers of steel' is no must-see, it also doesn't try to be, and it knows its limits. It may have its faults, but all involved demonstrate obvious skill, particularly when it comes to those essential stunts and fight scenes, and with this in mind, the only intent was to make a reasonably good flick - one that's a hair above average, even - within the bounds of what was feasible for these participants. Even those elements that share blame for to some degree diminishing the whole also have moments where they shine. This film won't be the one to change the minds of anyone who has a hard time engaging with the genre, or who is possibly encountering it for the first time, but anyone who has watched a decent cross-section of Hong Kong fare will readily recognize both where this iteration falls short, and where it distinctly succeeds more than some others. My expectations were mixed to low when I sat to watch, and I'm pleased to say that not only is the feature genuinely enjoyable, but it surpassed my expectations. I'm not saying you need to go out of your way to see it, and one should bear firmly in mind that it's no cinematic pinnacle, but if you appreciate martial arts pictures of the 70s and 80s and have the chance to check out 'Five fingers of steel,' then I'm glad to offer my hearty recommendation.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cockney kung-fu
d1senior3 July 2004
I bought this brand new for the princely sum of one pound on DVD, so it was bound to make it through to the semis on that basis alone. Although my knowledge of cheap kung-fu is hardly extensive, plot-wise it appears to be nothing new: an evil martial arts school attempts to take over a small village, killing the benevolent head of a security service in the process. Revenge is of course the order of the day, yet, without giving too much away, it's the relatively minor character who lives in the forest and spends all his time training who becomes the pivotal character towards the end of the film.

The all-important fight scenes are solid enough, with enough whip-crack sound effects on the soundtrack to keep anyone happy. The film's alternative title of 'Blood Baby' is explained in a surprisingly macabre pre-credits sequence, although, as is so often the case, the real star of the show here is the dubbing: anyone even slighly villainous finds themselves in possession of an outrageously phony cheeky cock-er-ney accent.

Exactly what is being insinuated about our friends in the capital, I'm not entirely sure, but it makes for damn entertaining viewing nevertheless.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed