Street Angels (Video 1993) Poster

(1993 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
If you require concepts such as professionalism and traditional notions of quality in your cinematic entertainment, steer clear.
tarbosh2200021 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Frank Adams (Saunders) is a wisecracking L.A. cop with an attitude. The Phantom (Strauss) is an evil crime lord with a large gang of baddies at his disposal. Before the Phantom and his minions can take over the streets, Adams decides that the one and only way to deal with the escalating crime situation is to pluck three women from prison, Tamara, the blonde one (Hengstler), Betina, the brunette (Lauren), and Anya, the redhead (Somers), and train them to be crime-fighting machines. After the death of his partner Murph, Adams is really mad, you see. After protecting the neighborhood for a while, they come to be called the "Street Angels", much like Curtis Sliwa's Guardian Angels. Or perhaps Charlie's Angels. Some kind of angels, anyway. Will our new heroines/hero be victorious, or will they be just more victims for The Phantom? Here we have a no-budget, shot-on-video item, or NBSOV for short. It appears Street Angels was shot on a standard-issue camcorder of the day, and it's a lot like the movies we would make with friends - but, thanks to Vista Street Entertainment, a specialist in downmarket product, this made it into video stores! We don't know how many, exactly, but we wonder if anyone rented it, saw the amateurish technical qualities, and stuck with it until the end. We sure did, as we always do, and once you get past the obvious drawbacks, the first hour is actually pretty entertaining. It has all the cop clichés we know and love, including a BYC (Black Yelling Chief) - this time played by DTV trooper David Jean Thomas, who appeared in No Code of Conduct (1998) and Retrograde (2004), to name just a few. Imagine all the classic tropes you know and love, but seemingly made for zero dollars by a bunch of enthusiastic teenagers. After the first hour, the movie starts to drag and the novelty wears off, however. With some better pacing, things could have improved a lot for the duration of the running time.

The movie is not quite Samurai Cop (1991), but it seems to be yearning in that direction. Instead of Amir Shervan and Matt Hannon, we have actor/writer/director/co-producer George Saunders, who wears a tanktop that reads "Fight Crime" and gives himself humorous (?) dialogue and sensitive narration. Is it tongue-in-cheek or meant to be taken seriously? It's very hard to tell. The villain, The Phantom, works out in his weight room while drinking a Bud Light and wearing sunglasses and tight jeans. He also appears to be homosexual, which was an interesting character choice for the main baddie. Of course, there's a training sequence, the expected Prerequisite Torture of the hero, some abrupt and completely out of the blue Punchfighting, and more, but it starts to get repetitive after a while. There are even references to contemporary events, such as Desert Storm and the L.A. riots, which add cultural context, but it still doesn't answer the questions of how this got into video stores and who rented it? We're used to junkiness, as well as the Mankillers (1987)/Hired to Kill (1990)-style plot line, and the time-honored Street Corner Justice (1996)/Annihilators (1985)-style "cleaning up the community" plot line, which got us to thinking about an imagined remake. It would feature Michael Madsen as the hero, Brian Thompson as the baddie, and Angie Everhart, Elizabeth Berkley, and...someone else as the girls. Generally we're against remakes, but a strike against Street Angels is the lame ending. We would change that. Though Dee Hengstler, who played Tamara, was in an episode of Cop Rock, so she's not completely expendable. She's got at least one for the win column.

Ruta Aras, writer/director of High Kicks (1993), was thanked in the end credits, and both Street Angels and High Kicks are both found on the Women Who Kick Butt DVD collection. Which companies are working behind the scenes to make this stuff happen? If you're a fan of forgotten SOV's in the bleedingskull.com tradition, you will most likely enjoy Street Angels. If you require concepts such as professionalism and traditional notions of quality in your cinematic entertainment, steer clear.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
All I have to say is.........WOW...(and not in a good way)
Lando_Hass12 March 2004
The way I came across this "movie" if you'd like to call it that, is I bought it for basically two dollars, and twenty five cents. Why so cheap? Because it came with three other movies, all basically the same, except the others aren't nearly as funny as this. First, I bought the dvd pack because it was so cheap, and it was four movies, and that means four more movies in the collection. I have to say, I don't regret buying this simply because all the movies are HILARIOUS!

This movie is trying to be serious, and I thought it would have at least been shot on something that didn't look like a videocassette format. I was wrong. This film was shot on video, most likely videocassette. It's simply horribly shot. The sound effects are terrible. When someone would get punched across the face, it would sound like a bone snapping. The editing isn't bad, considering how low budget it was. The acting was HILARIOUS. Each actor tries too sound serious, but the problem is that everything is forced out. In one scene (which made everyone laugh), a guy's close friend, or brother, forgot which, is killed. Then, he says don't do this to me (just like a bunch of other clichéd films), and then he sat down (which that alone looks forced), and screamed. I couldn't stop laughing, to the point to where my sides were hurting.

This movie, simply put it, is hilarious. It doesn't have the fundamentals that are naturally needed in order to make a film, it was shot on video, and every scene looks like the camera was hand-operated. Still, this movie is enjoyable if you fast forward to the funny parts. It looks like a something someone would film with a camcorder as a joke. This movie is hilarious. It has horrid acting, hilarious script, crappy camera work, and ridiculous sound effects. Still, it's hilarious.

Overall score: 2 out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Low. Budget very hard watch
waltruether19 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Not sure why this was ever made , it's not a real relabant story to the times and is a really bad attempt At Filmmaking although a 1 star for effort. I had a very hard time making It to the end so I turned it Off it was that bad , try It and see if ya gotta few bucks to lose or throw in a dumpster !
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Atrocious
gridoon26 February 2006
Frank is a tough LA cop (what else in new?) who's had it up to here with the red tape that's been making his life difficult (what else is new?), so he recruits three female prisoners (an ex-cop, an ex-marine and a gang member) and trains them to combat crime in his own unorthodox way. The premise may be completely unbelievable, but it's also the only reason one could possibly have for watching "Street Angels" in the first place, as it involves three fairly hot girls kicking a**. Other than that, this "film" is very bad. There is virtually no budget on display, and the fight choreography is painfully bad. There are also constant attempts at wit, and most of them are just annoying (the main villain just won't shut his damn mouth!), but occasionally they do hit a good one (my favorite: "You'll name our team Street Angels? That sounds like a bad no-budget action movie"!).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed