David Harding, Counterspy (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Tries For Its Roots
skallisjr29 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Columbia Pictures produced a number of films based on Old Time Radio programs. Several were serials, such as Captain Midnight and Jack Armstrong. But this one is a feature. Based on the radio program, "Counterspy," the radio show originated in 1942, and spent its war years having Harding and his counterspies contend against Gestapo and Black Dragon activities. The show was popular, and continued through 1957.

The film was set in the Cold War, but effectively was a flashback to 1943. In the beginning of the film, Harding causes a radio commentator to break a story with planted disinformation, so he brings the commentator in and, to compensate, gives him the story that comprises the film.

At the beginning of the story, a tough-as-nails Lieutenant Commander in the Navy, Jerry Baldwin, is drafted by the Counterspies to investigate espionage activities in a plant that manufactured torpedoes. Baldwin's predecessor, Phil Iverson, an Annapolis classmate, who was stationed at the torpedo plant, had been found dead, presumably from smoking in bed, but with some suspicion of murder. Baldwin was to take Iverson's job, but working with the Counterspies.

Iverson's widow, Betty Iverson, was a woman that Baldwin was in love with before she married. She is asked to take her old job back, as secretary to Baldwin. Baldwin dates her, and romance blooms. However, it turns out that she's in cahoots with the factory's doctor, George Vickers, who's the head of an Axis spy ring.

The story's scattered with a lot of clandestine activity, and refreshingly, most of the characters are fairly intelligent. A number of spy tricks are presented, and the story is worthy of the radio program it emulates.

David Harding, as a spymaster, usually directed activities rather than acting as a field agent. The film follows this pattern.

Especially good if the viewer is familiar with the radio series, but entertaining even if this is the first exposure to the title character.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Spies
boblipton17 December 2022
Chief of counterintelligence Howard St. John calls in broadcaster Alex Gerry. Gerry has been complaining on his radio that America has been letting nuclear secrets get through to foreign nations; none is specified, but he mentions a mustache. St. John tells him about a wartime case in which he sent Navy Lt. Commander Willard Parker to a plant manufacturing submarine torpedoes after his friend, who had been doing the work previously, had been killed under suspicious circumstances.

It's derived from COUNTERSPY, a long-running (1942-1957) radio drama devised by Phillips Lord, who also produced the better known GANGBUSTERS. This has everything a lover of cheap drama could wish for : spies, people with machine guns shooting up airports, romance in the person of Audrey Long, and a Murphy Bed. Obviously shot cheaply, it's typical of the second features that Columbia was turning out in the dying days of B series. Look for John Dehner in a small role.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
David Harding, Counterspy
CinemaSerf26 December 2022
If you can get past the rather oppressive opening commentary, then this turns out to be not a bad adventure story that warns of the dangers of fifth columnists operating in the United States during the recently ended WWII. Fortunately for all concerned, they had "David Harding" (Howard St. John). Now he is a shrewd and visionary man who co-ordinates a network of counter-espionage operatives the world over with a view to thwarting the cunning plans of the Nazis to steal valuable industrial secrets and sabotage vital munitions production. Willard Parker ("Baldwin") is a naval officer drafted into help the investigation when it seems that valuable information is leaking from a large torpedo-making factory. It turns out that his predecessor (quite literally) died after his cigarette set his bed alight, and being a bit suspicious he and the man's widow "Betty" (Audrey Long) decide to look into things. There are no shortage of ostensibly upstanding and honest suspects and the one thing "Baldwin" can be sure of his, they will not surrender quietly. There are a few quite effective red herrings here at the start, but as the story progresses the jigsaw puzzle starts to take shape just a little too readily leaving little room for jeopardy at the end. Still, it does move along well for seventy minutes and though maybe not a film I will remember, I quite enjoyed watching it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid and Tough-Minded Little B Film
joe-pearce-19 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I used to listen to the radio program COUNTERSPY when I was a kid, and can clearly recall running off to the American Theater to see this film when I was about 11, as I really wanted to 'see' David Harding, its lead character. All I remember now is not being surprised by Howard St. John, who played Harding on the radio, as he was exactly what I pictured David Harding would look like! Did they visually type cast even on the radio?

Anyway, seeing this film again after 65 years, I was rather surprised at just how good it was for a little radio-inspired B film. Well-mounted and acted, the real lead in the film is Willard Parker, an actor I always liked as a kid and still, to this day, can't quite understand why he never got out of Bs. His was a stalwart, ruggedly handsome presence (even more so than John Wayne's!) and he was really quite a good actor (as his delivery of some intentionally funny dialogue in this film shows). What surprises me now is just how unsympathetically Harding is portrayed; he is overbearing at all times, and more than willing to suspend anyone's legal rights if the fit is upon him. I don't recall him coming over as quite this type of agency head in the radio series. Of course, this was made during the Cold War, with a couple of semi-veiled descriptions of a particular dictator "with a large mustache", so we get the point that this was serious business and that Harding was not too interested in the finer points of the law in achieving his aims. Had they existed back then, reading one his or her Miranda Rights in this film would have been tantamount to turning it into a science fiction movie. This may not go over too well now, but in 1950 I'm sure most viewers were totally on his side. Audrey Long is fine in the female lead and when midway through the film we find that she is not quite the grieving widow of Parker's late friend as portrayed up to that point, it is quite a surprise - as is the real villain of the piece, played by Raymond Greenleaf in absolutely the best performance I've ever seen from him. Allied with the outward beneficence of the character he portrays, he gives nastiness a new definition in such a film as this one. Everybody in the movie seems to be either a government agent or a spy (or both) and the only likable character in the whole film is the one played by Parker. This is rather unusual for a B film of this type, meant mainly to fill the grind houses on Saturday or Sunday kiddie afternoons (which is how I saw it in 1950). Really, I kept expecting an uncredited Victor Jory, Paul Guilfoyle or Jack Lambert to come jumping out from behind a bush! But it looks good, has a decent amount of suspense even when certain expected results have been telegraphed to the viewer in advance, so that we often know exactly what is going to happen from one scene to the next, and the film gives what I have to assume is truthful coverage of the way such an agency as Harding's would have operated in those days. A good little film and worth viewing.

PS: This film 'stars' Parker and Long and, under their names, 'introduces' Howard St. John as Harding, but St. John had been in a good number of films prior to this one. Ah, the things one could get away with in those days.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ray Nazarro made it and it's not a western
searchanddestroy-117 April 2023
I am sure you have too much of the five fingers of your hand to count how many non western films Ray Nazarro directed. He made nearly ONLY westerns, as Lesley Selander. Nazarro also made CHINA CORSAIR and FLAME OF STAMBOUL; adventure flicks. So this one is very surprising for a western more than specialist, because we talk here of a spy intrigue, and very well done. Well paced, superb photography, excellent cast, i would have neevr guessed that Nazarro made this film. But the producer was not the awful Sam Katzman either - after all this is a Columbia movie. But the biggest problem is that it is predictable, as you can guess. But it's worth watching.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
When espionage strikes, make sure that your face is covered!
mark.waltz11 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Howard St. John, the distinguished character actor best known for supporting parts in "Born Yesterday" and "Li'l Abner", took on the title role (not quite the lead, but the moral conscience behind the story) in this single movie version of the radio series by Philip Lord (the man behind "Mr. District Attorney", another radio series which became a single film and later a brief T.V. series), playing an American espionage agent during World War II who utilizes false "confidential" information to entrap foreign agents. The story focuses on the romance between naval Lt. Commander Willard Parker and his secretary (Audrey Long) who unintentionally drops indications that she too might be one of the spies. This leads Parker into danger, and in one very tense series, he is knocked out and left for dead as the spies prepare to burn him to death!

Spies, it seems, are everywhere, even with a bartender whom Parker insults over his lack of alcohol in a drink. "If this drink was any darker, it would make great colored water", a variation on a line from the classic play "Stage Door", left me in hysterics. The film takes some time to get off the ground, but shortly into its 70 minutes, it has you looked. The lead villain, it appears, is somebody that Long has known all her life, and they are not afraid to give her their backhand across the face to keep her in line. As this was made during the Korean war (but set during the second World War), it still had timely statements to make, and even today when spies are discovered in the oddest of places, it is still pretty potent and excellent "B" movie fare.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Above Average First-Wave 'Spy" Movie...Packed to the Brim with Espionage, Action, Suspense, & Intrigue...Despite Low-Budget
LeonLouisRicci29 December 2022
Although Taking Place During the "Cold War", this Surprisingly Rich Low-Budget Espionage Film is Shown as Flash-Backs to the Underground of WWII Spy Infiltration at a Defense Plant.

It is Based on a Long Running (1942-57) Radio Program of the Same Name.

The Fast-Paced, Multi-Layered Story is Packed to the Brim with Military Types and a Government "Secret" Organization (Pre CIA/NSA).

With Agents, Double-Crosses and a Tight, Suspenseful Script that is Intriguing.

It Rises Above its Budget Limitations with some Sharp Characterizations, Gritty Violence, and Cracker-Jack ( 71 min) Pacing.

There's Real Suspense, Dodging Chases, Great Action (for type), some Romance, Betrayals, and Dry-Humor that Propels this Little-Seen Cheapo Above the Average Bottom of the Bill Filler.

All the Actors Give it a Go with Believable Situations Always On the Edge of Discovery or Confrontations.

There are Some Really-Cool, Almost Sci-Fi Gadgets and Stunts that are Amazing for its Limitations.

In 1950 the "Spy-Film" was just Getting Started and This One can Side with its Bigger-Budgeted Brethren in the Newly Emerging Genre and is Well...

Worth a Watch.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Spies at the defense plant
bkoganbing2 October 2014
Based on the radio series Counterspy. the title role of David Harding is played by Howard St. John as the rather stern Allen Dulles like section chief of an unnamed Intelligence agency. But the real action is handled here by Willard Parker who gets called back from the Pacific War to takeover the operation of a plant in California that is manufacturing torpedoes for the Pacific War.

As it turns out the widow of the guy that was in the job before Parker is Audrey Long who was going out with Parker while he was in Annapolis. After a while the two take up where they left off before. Still Parker's job is to find a nest of fifth columnist spies who've been getting information out of the plant.

I was pleasantly surprised in that I thought while hardly a great film, it was not as bad as I thought it would be. I was expecting a Cold War flag waver and it was not all that. The characters are not paste board figures, they do have some depth to them.

Take particular note of Raymond Greenleaf's portrayal of the plant doctor. Talk about hidden depth.

Nothing great here, but David Harding Counterspy might be worth a look.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A time-passer...not much more
planktonrules17 August 2023
"David Harding, Counterspy" is a low budget B-movie that is set during WWII though it was made a few years later and looked more like a Cold War film than an anti-Axis movie. In fact, while the film is supposed to be about Axis spies, you NEVER hear about the Germans or Japanese and the story could have just as easily been a film about Russian spies. The clothing the folks wear (particularly the women) didn't help, as they looked like they were from 1950 fashion and hair-wise.

The story is told as a flashback in order to explain why the government sometimes has to be very tricky and use a lot of disinformation to catch evil spies in the USA.

So why did I give this one a 5? Well, it is entertaining...though the acting isn't superb nor is the story. It smacks of the word 'adequate'...adequately entertaining and with an adequate story...nothing more.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Born into espionage
clanciai11 May 2023
Tough luck if you are a woman to happen to this: you have no life of your own, it is entirely controlled and manipulated by others, your destiny is not in your own hands, and if you are ordered to marry someone in a position just to further the espionage interest, you just have to do it and be completely powerless when your husband has to be murdered for having discovered or even suspected your double play. It's a grim and fast thriller about the facts of espionage, how it works, how relentlessly efficient every move must be to curtail the actions of the robbers of state secrets, and how every detail of the technique must work perfectly to get everything in order. This was a successful radio series for 15 years which was transferred for a film like this, it is not easy to follow all the sudden turns of the actions, but it sure is efficient. Howard St. John as Howard Parker is the chief actor and character, while Willard Parker and Audrey Long just have to follow along. The plot becomes quite plausible and reasonable when it appears that Audrey Long is the daughter of her doctor (Raymond Greenleaf), which no one could suspect. A kind old gentlemanly doctor is always absolutely above any suspicion. Only his motives are never explained.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
All talk, no action
gridoon202428 January 2024
"David Harding, Counterspy" is a low-budgeter almost exclusively populated by indistinguishable men in suits, mouthing enough hard-boiled dialogue ("when somebody throws surprises my way, I throw punches") to fry an egg factory. Ironically, the only source of life comes from the single female cast member, the beautiful (if little-known) Audrey Long, as a woman caught between dual loyalties. Apparently this was based on a popular at the time radio series: on radio obviously you only need dialogue to get the story across, but on the screen you need to visualize it as well, and this film lacks the means to do that. *1/2 out of 4.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed