An occult scientist tries to steal a collector's Chinese staff.An occult scientist tries to steal a collector's Chinese staff.An occult scientist tries to steal a collector's Chinese staff.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
Photos
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Featured review
A Very Short Serial?
A creepy-looking Harding Steerman shows up at the Australian home of Richard Norton and asks to look at an ornately carved Chinese stick he owns. On seeing it, he offers its owner two hundred pounds. The counter-offer is six thousand, whereupon Steerman hypnotizes Norton. Fortunately, neither daughter Violet Graham nor the butler are subject to such malarkey, and they throw the blighter out. Neither are they bothered by the sinister Chinese coolies who try to murder them in their beds. Meanwhile Sidney Vautier gets a letter saying he has inherited some property in England, so come right away. So the three good guys wind up on the same ship, where the youngsters fall in love, much to the displeasure of the old man, while Steerman works his sinister, world-ranging plans to make everyone so miserable he gets his Maguffin by spending several times six thousand pounds instead of, say, haggling.
This movie, with a writing credit for Guy Boothby, strikes me as a very short serial, and not a serial of the era, when the form was still a vibrant competitor to the feature film. No, it seems to me of the sort one got in the 1930s and 1940s, when it was intended for the kiddie matinees, when no one could clearly remember what had happened in the previous installment. Plot points are raised and when they no longer support the main narrative, are dropped. Production values are excellent -- there are crowds of extras and the sets are well dressed, but the script starts and stops, and the villain behaves like a frustrated four-year-old with mystic powers.
Perhaps this was deliberate. Mr. Boothby was an enormously popular writer whom no one ever accused of writing well. Perhaps this was intended for the audience who enjoyed his melodramatic tripe. If so, I am not the intended audience.
This movie, with a writing credit for Guy Boothby, strikes me as a very short serial, and not a serial of the era, when the form was still a vibrant competitor to the feature film. No, it seems to me of the sort one got in the 1930s and 1940s, when it was intended for the kiddie matinees, when no one could clearly remember what had happened in the previous installment. Plot points are raised and when they no longer support the main narrative, are dropped. Production values are excellent -- there are crowds of extras and the sets are well dressed, but the script starts and stops, and the villain behaves like a frustrated four-year-old with mystic powers.
Perhaps this was deliberate. Mr. Boothby was an enormously popular writer whom no one ever accused of writing well. Perhaps this was intended for the audience who enjoyed his melodramatic tripe. If so, I am not the intended audience.
helpful•10
- boblipton
- Jul 24, 2018
Details
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content