Because of Eve (1948) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Wow...this is amazingly explicit. yet also highly educational.
planktonrules26 March 2010
This film is a sex ed film that was meant to both inform and titillate audiences. However, unlike many exploitation films, this one is a lot more explicit and actually provides worthwhile information about sexually transmitted diseases. While it's very, very explicit (with a lot of nudity for the 1948s--heck, even by today's standards it's pretty explicit with its many pictures of genitalia), the film is shocking because it shows, with no holes barred, the effects of syphilis and gonorrhea--but ignores other STDs. While I have seen such films before (since I used to teach sex ed), I must admit that these are among the nastiest and scariest film clips I have ever seen! Yet, the film shows real lesions and advanced stage infestations--so it is reasonably accurate despite being so scary and tough to watch.

The narrator talks in a rather monotone and 'square' voice, but his information is essentially correct and not really exploitational. As for the accompanying story that accompanies the sex ed film, it's interesting because the nice doctor in the film also played the same sort of nice doctor in another exploitation film, "Street Corner". This isn't a bad thing, as he (Joseph Crehan) actually was a good actor with over 250 credits to his name! This is unusual for such films, as usually you see only actors who aren't really actors--just folks who are hooked into acting by scum-bag film makers. It's obvious that the film maker for "Because of Eve" was actually pretty accomplished! And, considering the film deals with STDs, abortion, sex, attempted suicide, childbirth and premarital sex in a frank way, it's quite ahead of its time.

Unlike most sex ed/exploitation films of the day, this one is rare in that it still packs information of value and has a lot of impact--not the usual unintended laughs because the film is so poorly made. This doesn't mean that there aren't some cheesy moments but that they just aren't as many and don't detract from the overall message--which isn't to blame people with STDs or have had premarital sex, but to inform.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not Your Typical 1948 Film
Michael_Elliott7 April 2010
Because of Eve (1948)

** (out of 4)

Bob and Sally are about to be married but first they must go to Dr. West (Joseph Crehan) for their blood test. Turns out that he previously had VD and she was in a relationship with a man who would be killed in war without knowing she was pregnant with his child. The two are furious with one another but the good doctor steps in to educate them on life, sex and marriage. This is yet another "road show" picture that tries to educate people but this is just the excuse used to show various things that you typically wouldn't see in a movie from 1948. If you've got a weak stomach then you'll probably want to avoid this thing as it certainly leaves nothing to the imagination. We start off seeing a film about VD and what effects gonorrhea and syphilis can have on a body. Later in the movie we see another clip of how male and female sex organs work and we finally end up seeing a couple babies being born. All of this stuff is in our face so expect a lot of nudity and graphic images of "parts" being eaten up with disease. The educational stuff here is pretty well laid out and there's no doubt people will learn stuff (if they didn't already know it). I found the drama stuff to be pretty good as the characters were fairly well written and at least they were interesting. The stories of Sally and Bob were fairly simple even though the twist was pretty hard to believe. That really doesn't take too much away though as the entertainment level is there and we have Crehan giving a pretty good performance.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sex and why not
BandSAboutMovies5 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Sally and Bob have been married a year and there's some good news. It seems like she's pregnant. That means they go to see Dr. West, who has no idea what HiPPA laws are or the privacy of the patient and we learn about how Sally had a baby with Bob's best friend who died in World War II and their issues with VD and when things get weird, he makes them watch some other movies within the movie like The Story of V. D., The Story of Reproduction and The Story of Life and oh man, throw away your popcorn because you know it's time to see diseased vaginas and penises. Let's throw in a cesarian and regular birth, because the people demand it!

After the movie, perhaps you'd like to purchase The Mid-Century Marriage Guide?

Director Howard Bretherton made a hundred or so low budget westerns and was a master of editing in camera, a skill he passed on to his son David Bretherton, who edited Cabaret and Westworld, and his granddaughter Gillian L. Hutshing, who was on the editing team for Blade Runner, Rad, Eyes of Fire and The Monster Squad.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not exactly my idea of doctor/patient confidentiality.
mark.waltz5 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Assuming that engaged couple Wanda McKay and John Parker have told each other about their sordid pasts, doctor Joseph Crehan blurts it out to the other, causing friction between the two. She was an unwed pregnant woman whose baby had died in childbirth and he has venereal disease as the result of an encounter in college. The misunderstandings lead to a further cleansing of the past with videos on syphilis and gonorrhea early on and how the female body changes during pregnancy later in the film.

There's nothing really scandalous in a modern sense, but the closeups of male and female sex organs in the films within the film were pretty scandalous in 1948. This tries too hard to have multiple themes while being exploitive, and ends up as just dull, preachy and much ado about nothing. Certainly the big moral sin here is the doctor's big mouth and Crehan's awful performance. Should be seen once for its audacious lack of historical value because then it just ends up an unintentional comedy.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
More explicit than anything I've ever seen
fan4ad2 September 2002
Okay, this is pure exploitation wrapped up in a wholesome frame. It starts out with all kinds of explanations why the made the film. Also, it adds God and the Bible to support its view. It starts off innocently enough--a couple messing around (I think the man even cops a feel). Then, we find out she is pregos, but with the help of the most benevolent doctor in history, the couple learned the facts of life that they weren't taught. We go back to the week before their wedding and the doctor lets out a secret. They are in solid health, but he once had VD and she had an illegitimate baby. Now, what docotr would ever say that without fear of a lawsuit. However, everything is okay in the end because, despite their anger, they find out she was impregnated by his best friend who died in the war. The same friend who gave him VD (long story). Anyhow, they watch very nasty films about VD, pregnancy, and the most visual birth and cesarian birth ever. The films are nasty. Lots of penis and vagina shots. Go learn the facts of life.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed