This documentary chronicles the extraordinary and "imeldific" life of Imelda Marcos. The words opulent, lavish, and luxurious were not strong enough to describe her lifestyle, so another word had to be invented to describe her status. She led a life almost impossible to imagine. If not for documentaries like this that can provide us with the details of her extravagance, most of the students in this class might not believe the story. Besides wealth, Imelda also amassed great political power. She was known worldwide and had numerous interactions with various heads of state and other powerful people (like the pope). The film dealt with her history by sharing anecdotes, showing film clips, and through interviews with several people. The filmmaker had an incredible amount of cooperation from the Marcos family in creating this film. Interviews with two of the Marcos children, Imelda herself, and several other friends and family members were used to tell her tale. She had a lot of ups and downs through life from surviving the Japanese occupation, to becoming the "first lady" (and also a governor). She survived an assassination attempt. She also went from the palace into exile and later returned to the Philippines. Again, there were so many ups and downs, and again she led a very remarkable and ambitious life.
The film was a fair portrayal, allowing Mrs. Marcos to tell her side of the story. The film also questioned her role in several scandals such as the construction accidents involved in the hurried making of her building projects, and the Aquino assassination. Imelda has an explanation for every controversy. She mentioned that she is often misunderstood. The film confronts her on these issues, and the perceptions that people have, but she explains that her perceptions are different as she sees things in their totality (unlike the rest of us). Imelda was also enigmatic in her views, and in a few scenes she was quite philosophical in explaining the world, the universe, and her place in it. I had a difficult time trying to follow her logic in order to make sense of it all, but I bet I am not the only one having this problem.
Some of the issues discussed in the movie were the abject poverty that people lived in, while the Marcos's were swimming in wealth. The majority of people lived in poor housing conditions and lacked basic needs. Imelda chose to ignore their plight, and spend government money on fancy new buildings in order to bring forth the culture and arts that she felt they needed. She saw herself as a generous and giving person. When asked about her clothes and shoes, she stated that she was a role model and that she gave poor people and example and set a goal for them to achieve (to be like her). She further stated that people lived vicariously through her and wanted her to live that way. Other issues discussed involved corruption, media suppression, voter fraud, martial law, and the violation of basic human rights (while jailing dissenters). Mrs. Marcos denies such accusations in her normal delusional way, stating that there were no human rights violation complaints ever made against her or her husband's office.
Imelda had a remarkable ambition that could have done so much more for her people.
Diaz, R. (Producer), Diaz, R. (Director). (2003) Imelda Motion Picture. Philippines: United Pictures
The film was a fair portrayal, allowing Mrs. Marcos to tell her side of the story. The film also questioned her role in several scandals such as the construction accidents involved in the hurried making of her building projects, and the Aquino assassination. Imelda has an explanation for every controversy. She mentioned that she is often misunderstood. The film confronts her on these issues, and the perceptions that people have, but she explains that her perceptions are different as she sees things in their totality (unlike the rest of us). Imelda was also enigmatic in her views, and in a few scenes she was quite philosophical in explaining the world, the universe, and her place in it. I had a difficult time trying to follow her logic in order to make sense of it all, but I bet I am not the only one having this problem.
Some of the issues discussed in the movie were the abject poverty that people lived in, while the Marcos's were swimming in wealth. The majority of people lived in poor housing conditions and lacked basic needs. Imelda chose to ignore their plight, and spend government money on fancy new buildings in order to bring forth the culture and arts that she felt they needed. She saw herself as a generous and giving person. When asked about her clothes and shoes, she stated that she was a role model and that she gave poor people and example and set a goal for them to achieve (to be like her). She further stated that people lived vicariously through her and wanted her to live that way. Other issues discussed involved corruption, media suppression, voter fraud, martial law, and the violation of basic human rights (while jailing dissenters). Mrs. Marcos denies such accusations in her normal delusional way, stating that there were no human rights violation complaints ever made against her or her husband's office.
Imelda had a remarkable ambition that could have done so much more for her people.
Diaz, R. (Producer), Diaz, R. (Director). (2003) Imelda Motion Picture. Philippines: United Pictures
