Devil's Harvest (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Where there's smoke . . .
allenk7529 September 2011
Perfectly awful "anti-marijuana" film in the "Reefer Madness" mode. This is one of the worst in this genre, but it's not without its share of unintentional laughs: a "dealer" has a hot dog stand and puts joints in the bun before selling them; there's a night club in a storage building so threadbare that only Ed Wood Jr. could love it; and a cheap image of the devil is superimposed on the goings-on here and there. The acting is so bad one wonders if the cast was on -- as they say in the movie -- "loco weed" for real. Less than an hour long but feels a lot longer. A much better -- but still not good -- film of this type is "She Shoulda Said No," which is far more entertaining.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
About what you might expect...
planktonrules12 May 2020
When the new and tougher Production Code was put into place in mid-1934, movies suddenly were sanitized of all potentially offensive material. Up until this time, sex, drugs, adultery, abortion and so many other taboo topics were anything but taboo. But starting in 1934, filmmakers were in a quandary...how could they appeal to the baser instincts of many folks? The answer were so-called 'educational films'....movies that purported to warn parents against various sins but were mostly just excuses to SHOW all this vice! And, since many theaters refused to show these films, folks often made the films and drove across the country showing them in special engagements in a wide variety of venues. At least 90% of these movies were garbage...with abysmal acting and writing. They also often gave false and confusing messages that either actually ENCOURAGED the sinful behavior or dispensed 'facts' that were completely ridiculous. Some of the worst of them were "Sex Madness", "Reefer Madness" and "She Shoulda Said No!"....but these are just a few of hundreds of terrible exploitation films of the era.

Is "Devil's Harvest" one of the terrible exploitation movies that strange people (like me) enjoy laughing at today because they are so inept and silly? Well, it's not good...nor is as laughably bad as some of the more egregious examples.

This film is about the evils of marijuana and a gang who have infiltrated a town and are corrupting the youth. At a local 'dance club' young people dance....and succumb to the evils of pot! In one scene, a huge fight breaks out...caused by pot. So the police investigate and send in an undercover agent to flush out the demons responsible for wacky tobacky.

As you'd expect, the acting looks unprofessional and is highly uneven. A few of the 'actors' aren't bad...but most obviously are NOT professionals and it shows. Additionally, the effects of marijuana are greatly overstated (not surprising) but don't sink to the level of the piano playing guy in "Reefer Madness"! Overall, a very bad film that is entertaining and funny in it's own way....provided you like watching craptastic movies.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shine on Harvest Pot.
mark.waltz18 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It will come as absolutely no surprise to viewers of classic movies that this film is absolutely wretched in every single way. The acting is embarrassingly hideous and the script and editing make absolutely no sense. There have been exploitations made about the subject matter of marijuana consumption before, most notably "Reefer Madness", but those are laughably bad in a fun way and a definite subject to study for film students. This features a cast of actors far too old to play high school students where apparently a marijuana craze has taken over from their studies. Edits in the film pop scenes from one to another in a way that makes absolutely no sense, and it's obvious that the actors are reading cue cards and had never laid their eyes on the script before. Perhaps the director was afraid that if they saw the script and actually had a rehearsal, more serious actors would walk out. He had nothing to worry about. These so-called actors couldn't act their way out of cigarette paper. The film is totally tedious and boring, not even worthy of being studied as how not to make a film. It is just a travesty in every way, without a doubt in the top hundred of most unwatchable movies I've ever seen.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed